Print
Permanent LinkIowa Legislature Public Hearings
Public Hearings and times are as follows:
HSB 255 - A bill for an act prohibiting and requiring certain actions relating to abortion involving the detection of a fetal heartbeat, and including effective date provisions.
Sponsored by the Health and Human Services Committee
Tuesday, July 11, 2023
9:30 AM (introductions begin)
11:00 AM (conclusion of the hearing)
RM 103, Sup. Ct. Chamber
07-07-2023
Peggy Knudsen [Cradle of Hope Pregnancy Resource ]
PRO
I would like to share a couple of short testimonies of our clients who came to us abortion vulnerable but wanted an Ultrasound. When they heard/seen the heartbeat of their baby even as early as 7 weeks it confirmed life for them and made the choice to carry to term.
07-07-2023
07-07-2023
Angela Wenell [Concerned Citizen]
PRO
I am in favor of HSB 255. Modern technology leaves no room to doubt that an unborn child is a human life, and bodily autonomy does not include the right to directly harm the body of another. The right to life is the most basic of human rights, as enshrined in our founding documents. That we are endowed by our Creator with unalienable rights, among those are the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. It is not a coincidence that the right to life is listed first among all others, for if we do not have the right to life, the rest have no meaning. And governments are instituted by the citizens for the primary responsibility to preserve these rights. The stain of abortion on American has gone on long enough. It is time to end this atrocity.
07-07-2023
AJ Potter [Pleasantville Baptist Church]
PRO
I wish to speak in support of the Prolife legislation at this hearing.
07-07-2023
07-07-2023
Brandon Pollard [n/a]
CON
Count me as among the 61% of Iowans that think abortion should be legal in most or all cases. No new restrictions should be added. The reasons for my opposition are numerous and I wish to keep these comments brief so I will not go into detail.If we wish to reduce abortions this legislation is a cruel way to do it. The more effective and morally just way would be to attempt to address the underlying causes that make abortion necessary including (but not limited to) a lack of access to contraception, a lack of family supports, and a lack of sufficient funding to reduce poverty in the state.If our legislature chooses to enact this legislation against the will of Iowans the very least they can do is pair it with legislation to provide increased access to low and nocost medical care for pregnant women, new mothers, and small children.
07-07-2023
Carrie Wright [Private Citizen]
PRO
I support this bill. Babies in their mothers wombs have a human right to be protected.
07-07-2023
Kevin Lam []
CON
This is not what Iowans want. Abortion bans result in the death of women.
07-07-2023
Aidan Yoder [N/A]
CON
This is a bad bill. Women deserve reproductive rights. This will result in injury and death by removing access to healthcare.
07-07-2023
Robert Nazario []
PRO
We need the Heartbeat Bill / Law to stand in Iowa. We must protect life from womb to senior years of life.
07-07-2023
Shellie Flockhart []
PRO
I am for the heartbeat bill.
07-07-2023
AJ Potter [Pleasantville Baptist Church]
PRO
I wish to speak in support of the Prolife legislation at this hearing.
07-07-2023
Paul Dykstra [Iowa Prayer Caucus]
PRO
So precious is the life we save.
07-07-2023
Anonymous [Self]
CON
The right to an abortion is supported by an overwhelming majority of Americans, including Iowans. * 61% of Iowans including Republicans, Democrats, and Independents support access to safe and legal abortion.Abortion is overwhelmingly safe.Abortion is common. One in four women who are able to get pregnant will have an abortion at some point.Abortion is essential health care, a constitutional right, and a human right.Abortion remains safe and legal in Iowa for now. But its hanging by a thread and politicians in power are working hard to take away our rights for their political gain.Any ban or restriction on abortion is harmful and takes away Iowans abilities to determine their futures and what is best for them and their family. No one else can know a persons situation their health, wellbeing, risks, and future. Abortion is a deeply personal decision. Every person deserves the right to control their reproductive health, and their future. Politicians should not put themselves in the middle of Iowans health care or their decisions.Never before has a governor called a special session to advance a political agenda. A ban on the rights of Iowans is all about politics.Calling a special session in the middle of summer for the sole purpose of stripping Iowans of the liberties they prize is not only unprecedented but shows the drastic lengths powerhungry politicians will take to pass deeply unpopular policies.Iowans are raising their voices and holding their elected officials accountable for every vote they take to limit our rights and bodily autonomy. Regardless of our personal beliefs, we can all agree Iowans deserve the right to control their futures and access reproductive health care.
07-07-2023
Anonymous [Health Organization]
PRO
I am technically neutral on this legislation but would like legislators consider adding a provision that is helps save the lives of many moms and babies.
07-07-2023
Marisa Jefferis [Nursing student]
CON
As a future health professional, Im angry and saddened that politicians think they know better than doctors and nurses whats best for patient health. Im not even going to bother protesting or showing up. Im focused on finishing nursing school and getting out of Iowa and moving to a state where I can practice. Also, one male nurse in my cohort plans on moving to Minnesota. I, and may other health professionals will move to another state to flee from persecution. In addition, I plan on working in labor and delivery. Iowa already has a nursing shortage, bills like this make people not want to live and work here. Like I said, Im sorry for the people who live here. Ive lived here for over 5 years, but Ive already decided to move to a state that protects health care providers and womens health.
07-07-2023
Wendy Ringgenberg []
CON
Please keep abortion as a legal option to 20 weeks. A woman has a right to choose whether or not to carry a fetus to term at least to the time of viability. The state is not and should not be concerned about future citizens until they are viable.
07-07-2023
Marti Anderson [self]
CON
I oppose this bill and will provide comments before the Public Hearing.
07-07-2023
Alison Kanealy []
CON
I do not support a total abortion ban or a ban of any kind on abortion services. It should be an individual decision left up to the person. There is no space in my ovaries to fit your legislature. Support the right to choose.
07-07-2023
Del []
CON
This is not the legislature's business. It is a private matter between people and their doctor. This procedure will be needed and people will have abortions. Access to this procedure should be private and convenient.
07-07-2023
Anonymous [AFIIC ]
CON
Politicians have no right to interfere with the health care of women. Pass policies that improve people's lives and strengthens their freedoms.
07-07-2023
Sabrina Anderson [Private Citizen ]
CON
This bill doesnt protect the life of the person who is a fully formed human being. The fetus is not viable without the mother. If their life circumstances wont allow them to care for a potential child, if they simply dont wish to have a child (any male partner has the right to leave but the female doesnt?), if they dont wish to experience the trauma of pregnancy or birth, potential death due to pregnancy, losing a job, living in poverty, not being able to financially or emotionally support a child, and countless other reasons a woman or person who could possibly become pregnant doesnt/cant have a child they should not be forced to carry a fetus to term. Why are we trying to force religious beliefs on our entire nation? If you dont want an abortion, dont have one. You dont speak for every woman/person. The choice should be with them and their doctor. Stop governing womens bodies and focus on the issues that are impacting the children that are here.
07-07-2023
Paula Denison [Catholics for Choice]
CON
Thank you for allowing testimony on this bill. Please respect the opinions of all of your constituents.
07-07-2023
Hilary McAdoo [University of Iowa- Reproductive Medicine RN]
CON
I work at our WDM location for infertility and IVF. I get the incredibly role of assisting women in their journey to become a mother. Quite frankly it's a brutal one. One that Kim Reynolds has no inclinations about or what we do. Forcing women to carry unwanted, or non compatible with life will only increase maternal death rates. I've met many women they have the biggest hearts and drive to become mothers but unfortunately are dealt a hand if a poor prognosis for the infant they carry. Forcing them to carry a pregnancy does not and will never guarantee a happy, healthy baby in the end. Abortion is a core value of women's health and HAS to remain legal.
07-07-2023
Jennifer Olsen []
CON
It is unbelievable that a woman's right to health care is being controlled and denied by politicians in 2023. You all should be ashamed of yourselves. Abortion bans kill and harm women and girls and you should be ashamed of yourselves for promoting this harmful legislation. Iowa women deserve freedom just like a man. If you pass this harmful law, will you pass a law that makes men pay for fetus support at conception? Will men have to pay for the healthcare, or will women have to go into debt to support a baby she did not want? Women deserve better. We have rights and you are taking them away for your own political gain. It is antiAmerican to pass this law. Antifreedom. Abortion is a right of a woman and the majority of the State and the country wants the right to remain in place. If you really cared about women you would protect us from this government overreach. Adoption takes the consent of the father also so truly a women will be forced to have a child she does not want, and the decision is taken from her by the GOVERNMENT. PLEASE VOTE NO TO THIS ANTIAMERICAN LAW!!!!!!!!
07-07-2023
Anonymous [n/a]
CON
I find it very frightening and also ironic that the governor and other elected officials want to practice medicine without a license. Last I checked this IS illegal. I don't feel it is practical or necessary for a politician to be making health decisions for those people they don't personally know, much less their medical histories. We all can make our own healthcare decisions and choices no matter what they are. Things can go wrong in a hurry in a pregnancy and every single pregnancy is different. I have a friend who lives in a state where abortion is literally banned experience the premature rupture of membranes (water breaking early) and she had to travel several hundred miles to another state to get the medical care she desperately needed. She was forced to play Russian Roulette with her health knowing she could either go into labor or worse yet, go into septic shock within minutes because the her own OB/Gyn was not able to assist her. My friend's doctor quite literally told her he could not help her any longer and that she was on her own. She had to take time off from work, arrange for childcare, reserve a hotel room, purchase very expensive plane tickets, pay extra to be seated near the restroom just in case something adverse happened during her travels and to add to her stress and trauma, when she arrived at the clinic, she was called very, very vile names by protesters on the sidewalk who had no clue what was actually happening to her and why she was there. Physicians in these states where abortion healthcare is banned are literally packing up and leaving in droves. My own OB/Gyn advised me that if this ban were to go through, she would leave the state as well. It is bad enough Iowa has one third of its 99 counties that is in a maternal/fetal care desert. We do not need to make this worse by imposing a ban. We can not afford to become another Texas, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Mississippi, Louisiana, Florida, North Dakota, South Dakota or Idaho. It is not acceptable pure, plain and simple. Just because a ban is imposed does not mean abortion will go away. It will just make it more dangerous for women. Forcing women to carry and give birth is not a very positive option either. We do not need to roll back 50 years with women being placed in dangerous situations sitting in a back alley with coat hangers. Abortion needs to be safe and legal. We need to allow the physicians to do their jobs. They are the ones with the education and training and are the ones who can assist their patients in making prudent choices. We do not need to be threatening them with outrageous fines and jail time if they help someone in need. In the year that Roe V Wade was struck down by the US Supreme Court, we have seen too many stories of women being turned away because the physicians were too scared to treat them. Once again, politicians do not belong in making medical decisions for others. I also find it very concerning that there is only a 2 HOUR window available for folks to testify on this very, very important and personal matter. I feel our governor is not being transparent, nor is she listening to the People of Iowa who feel that abortion needs to be available. In fact, all the polls show that 60 percent of Iowans feel that there should not be a ban at all. Why not put this matter on the ballot and truly allow the People to decide? In closing, I strongly OPPOSE HSB 255 as people need to have the ability to make their own reproductive and healthcare decisions and choices without the interference of the State of Iowa for any other governmental body. No bans. Ever.
07-07-2023
Aaron Murphy [Private Citizen]
CON
61% of Iowans have repeatedly called for continued access to safe and legal abortion. If Iowa passes a fetal heartbeat or additional bans on abortion services, our population will continue its decline. Please listen to Iowans keep access to abortion legal.
07-07-2023
Toni Walker []
CON
Women are more intelligent than you are giving them credit. Being a woman I am positive I know more about my body than you or any man. Women are not property. When vasectomies are required by law, I will stop opposing abortion restriction. Viagra seems to be very important to men. If they can't get it up naturally they have artificial means. Let women decide whether they want to bear children. And as for children having children, I can't fathom why you think that's a good idea. They wouldn't all grow up to be Republicans anyway. You would be shooting yourself in the foot if you think so.
07-07-2023
Diana Lee Wright [Boone County Democrats]
CON
I oppose any restrictions on abortion. This is a concern for a woman, or girl, and her health care providers and any restrictions endanger the health of women. As a retired physician, I know what access to reproductive health care means and any restrictions will lead to adverse outcomes and even death for women. Please leave these most personal of health care decisions to those who are facing them and their providers.
07-07-2023
Anonymous [None ]
CON
No one has the right to make a woman carry a child that she does not want for any reason. 30 years ago, I got pregnant after several doctors told me that I could never have children. Well, they were wrong. Not only was I not ready for a child at 22, but my extremely abusive boyfriend said that I would not have that child no matter what. I am now 50, and I thank God everyday and Planned Parenthood helped me through my abortion. Am I proud, no, but I am relieved with my choice. MY CHOICE! The Government has no business trying to force people to have babies. It truly makes me sick and sad to live in a Country that would force that on anyone!
07-07-2023
Anonymous [Retired]
CON
Right to reproductive healthcare choices is vital for all Iowans. This is clearly a decision that must be made between a woman and her family and doctor. Government mandates affecting all Iowans based on religious beliefs of a small group of zealots should not be allowed. Stop these shady backdoor actions and support the separation of church and state established by America's founders. Abortion is vital healthcare.
07-07-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Abortion is healthcare. Women have a right to body autonomy and to make healthcare decisions with their family and their doctors. Politicians and religion have absolutely no place in anyones healthcare.
07-07-2023
Mary Wilcynski []
CON
The idea that the proposed bill is pro life is absolutely crazy. How can the state legislature and Governor justify creating added hoops for SNAP families, push to abandon human rights for the LGBTQ+ community, ban books, threaten to limit access to contraceptives, dismantle the public school system, thus limiting opportunities for underrepresented and underprivileged families..now stand up and yell from a pro life bully pulpit. The Republican legislature and Republican Governor is not pro life. You are just opposed to human rights. You are opposed to having people who dont look like you have any rights or privileges in Iowa. We are now ranked 43rd in the nation in public education. We are ruled by a loud minority of people bulldozing the voices of the majority. We deserve to be heard. We deserve to be represented. We deserve to have a Governor and legislature committed to the citizens of Iowa,not committed to their political ambitions.
07-07-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Leave medical decisions to the woman and her doctor!
07-07-2023
Anonymous [St. Peter Lutheran Church]
CON
If this law goes into effect, it will block virtually all abortion in the state. Banning abortion denies a person the fundamental right to control their own body and health care decisions. This bill will harm Iowans by stripping them of the ability to control their body and future.
07-07-2023
Cindy Kreassig []
CON
Stop taking away womens agency. The State has no right to decide health care decisions for anyone. The State does not need for a woman to explain their health care choices. Many, many women do not know they are pregnant at 6 weeks. Your bill is misleading as the heart is not developed until 10 weeks gestation. Before that there are electrical impulses that need an invasive vaginal ultrasound to detect. Dont want an abortion? Dont have one. Stop killing women!
07-07-2023
Connie Kennedy []
CON
There is no way for any bill to accommodate all the problems that can arise during a pregnancy. These types of discussions belong solely to the doctor and the patient (and whoever she chooses to be involved). No one else, period.
07-07-2023
Anne Sloth []
CON
As a woman and former Registered Nurse, I speak out against ANY ban on abortion. I know how necessary and important health care is for women. The right to have a safe and legal abortion is part of a woman's health care, whether she chooses to have one or not. The women of Iowa deserve to make their own decisions, they don't need to be told what they can or cannot do. This is wrong for Iowa! No bans on abortion!Thankyou,Anne Sloth
07-07-2023
Joe Stutler []
CON
This bill is abhorrent, as are it's sponsors and supporters.
07-07-2023
Anonymous [n/a]
CON
If this law goes into effect, it will block virtually all abortion in the state. Banning abortion this early in a pregnancy denies a person the fundamental right to control their own body and health care decisions before they ever know they are pregnant. This bill will harm Iowans by stripping them of the ability to control their body. Nothing is more important than preserving our bodily autonomy. We cannot ignore the will of Iowans when over 60% of us believe abortion should remain legal in most or all cases. Please vote NO on this bill and listen to the will of the people of this state.
07-07-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I believe women deserve to make their own health care decisions. A woman should have more rights than a mass of cells.
07-07-2023
Cindy Rail []
CON
This is a despicable piece of legislation! You are trying to take away a woman's right to choose. No one should have the right to do this!! It's her body!!
07-07-2023
Kevin Lawrence []
CON
I am a physician who trained at CCOM & UIHC in Iowa City.I'm deeply disappointed that this bill is even being brought before the legislature. These actions are not theoretical anymore, we've seen the harm they are having on women in other states. This bill is an appalling act of disrespect toward women in Iowa, and shows an unconscionable disregard for their rights and safety by the Governor and her party legislators.
07-07-2023
Shay Lilienthal []
CON
Women have been so irreparably mistreated by the government and its frankly disturbing overreach into a woman's reproductive rights. Leave bodily autonomy alone! Women have been making choices about their bodies for as long as humans have exsisted. To pass this bill would be to tell every single woman in the state of Iowa that their ability to make decisions about their bodies is a gluke. That is beyond small minded, disrespectful, and overreaching. Knock it off and leave women alone!
07-07-2023
Lindsay Amadeo []
CON
Vote no on any type of abortion restriction. Iowa woman deserve the FREEDOM to make their own healthcare decisions including when to start a family. Politicians and political agendas have no place in that decision. One party's religiousbased values should not trump religiousbased values of other denominations.
07-07-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
Vote no on this bill. The people do not want this. It will not stand up to court scrutiny. This is a publicity stunt.
07-07-2023
Anonymous [female citizen]
CON
The reason abortion was made legal when I was in college is to make it SAFE. That was the driving force. It makes no difference what the reason is for a woman to be so desperate to have an abortion. If SHE needs one she needs a SAFE and AVAILABLE one. It is not a walk in the park for a woman to have an abortion. It is very likely the hardest thing she will ever do in her life. Men seem to think it is not painful physically or mentally or emotionally or financially. They are WRONG.This bill will endanger women even more than they are now. Since the beginning of time abortions have always been a necessary thing for women. Women "fell down steps", used wire hangers, or knitting needles, back alleys or poisons. So now you wish to make women go back to the old days. Since my youth it has been legal the SAFE AND UNDER THE AUTHORITY OF MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS, not politicians. It should only be between a WOMAN AND HER DOCTOR.I did not know I was pregnant at 6 weeks. Many don't, so this is just a more tactical way of banning abortion.You write bills that cut to the very bone of personal privacy, so I think it's fair for me to ask personal privacy questions. Like, how many of you men use your own, not the woman's contraceptive, but your own birth control every time you have sex with ANY womaneven your wives? You are putting all the responsibility of birth control on the woman. Women do not become pregnant without a man making her so. I would say that since very very few men can answer my question in the positive, I think it would be better to make a law to regulate male fertility, especially since men do not feel the responsibility to control it themselves. You can control male fertility without endangering the man at all. Instead you put the women in peril for something that the man could have prevented in the first place. This is a blatant male domination move, with religious and philosophical excuses for it. If your daughter or granddaughter needed an abortion I'd bet you she would get a safe one somewhere because you have the power and money to get it done. You would not let her be in danger for her life or change the future she was aiming for. Yet you condemn other women to that fate.MENUSE YOUR OWN CONTRACEPTIVE OR ABSTAIN FROM SEX AND STOP PUTTING WOMEN IN DANGER!
07-07-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
Please show Iowans that we still live in a state of liberties and in a democracy. A significant majority of Iowans support the right to an abortion and have no major issues with our current 20week law. Don't use your power to push your personal views or those of our governor. A con vote would represent 60%+ of Iowans who do NOT support extreme restrictions on abortion (which a 6week ban would be). Vote for ALL IOWANS vs your personal views or an extreme base. Maintain women's rights. Banning abortions does not support women, children, or families in Iowa. Vote for IOWANSmaintain our democracy.
07-07-2023
Garry Klein [Private citizen]
CON
Foundationally, this proposed law presumes knowing what is best for the person pursuing an abortion procedure. Without the autonomy to make such decisions, the person is being denied their basic right to selfdetermination. To the content of the proposed law itself:There is no exceptions made for patient circumstance such as rape, incest, or domestic abuse or economic hardship. Further the ability to detect a heartbeat does not adequately describe the condition of the fetus, nor the condition of the potential bearer. Nor does I provide the medical personnel protection for judgment decisions which would cause liability issue both for care providers and facilities in which procedures take place.
07-07-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Women should have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and should have the right to get a safe, accessible abortion if they want.
07-07-2023
07-07-2023
Lisa Petrie []
CON
This bill is government at its biggest. Abortion is health care. Health care decisions are between a woman and her doctor. Vote NO on HSB 255.
07-07-2023
Jean Kaul-Brown [Iowan]
CON
I'm a mom, with two young children. And, unlike many of you who will be voting Yes on this bill, I've given birth. I've undergone that incredibly difficult and transformative experience and I can't believe that a bunch of lawmakers are going to attempt to impose their will on moms like me. While I have never had to make the decision to end a pregnancy or ever have had to consider it, I believe in every woman's right to make that most personal decision. While the text of the bill allows for exceptions for rape, incest and the health of the mother, we've already seen in other states with these sorts of bans that these are not clear black and white situations. Just how close to death does a woman need to be in order for the doctor to feel comfortable saving her life? How does a woman prove that she was a victim of rape? Do you have to bring a police report to your doctor? While all of these exceptions sound good in theory, in the end, their application is incredibly difficult and nuanced. What's not difficult? Leave Iowa women alone. Let them and their families make decisions. Get politicians out of our OBGYN offices.
07-07-2023
Jillianne vertina []
CON
The only person who's opinion matters when it comes to Healthcare that isnt the patient is the dr who determines whether or not the patient will survive the treatmentThe clump of cells inside is not the patient; the human who has to endure all this is
07-07-2023
Ida Santana MD [Behavioral Health Group ]
CON
Abortion bans are dangerous and immoral. This is a cruel misogynistic fascist ploy to subjugate and oppress women. Abortion Rights Are Iowa Nice!
07-08-2023
George Ensley []
CON
Slash Abortions by Slashing Unwanted PregnanciesIsn't it better to PREVENT unwanted pregnancies than to force pregnancies on (usually) young Iowa women??The Contraceptive Choice Project (at the Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis) enrolled 9,256 women and adolescents in the St. Louis area between 2007 and 2011. Participants were 1445 years of age, at risk for unintended pregnancy.The study showed that abortions are DECREASED by about 65%75% just by using FREE LONG TERM IUD and IMPLANT birth control.Condoms can break, and "The Pill" isn't always taken properly.For a fuller explaination PLEASE read https://source.wustl.edu/2012/10/abortionratesplummetwithfreebirthcontrol/This program would pay for itself in a few years by reducing state costs!It is a fact that Unwanted Pregnancies result in Unwanted Children. Unwanted children drive up society costs via increased Medicaid, WIC, Aid to Families with Dependent Children, rent assistance, increased Educational costs, increased incarceration costs, then increased prison costs .... and the cycle starts over.IF IOWA IS GOING TO SLASH THE ABILITY OF IOWA WOMEN TO HAVE CONTROL OVER THEIR BODIES, IOWA MUST GIVE THEM THE TOOLS AT NO COST TO VOLUNTARILY SLASH THEIR PREGNANCY RATES.
07-08-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
Stop legislation to control my body. Get your religion out of my government
07-08-2023
Stacy []
CON
This bill will harm women. Doctors will delay care until a woman's health is in crisis. Women and girls deserve to make health care decisions with their doctor, not a legislator.
07-08-2023
Ann M. York []
CON
I very strongly urge our legislators to reject the fetal heartbeat bill and retain the rights of women to make decisions about their own bodies and health.
07-08-2023
Mary Kenyon [Self]
CON
I do not support this bill. Please leave medical decisions to individuals and their medical teams.
07-08-2023
Amy Seidelman []
CON
Keep abortion legal in Iowa.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I, along with a majority of Iowans, want women to have access to abortion. Im sure it would be a very difficult decision to have one, but it is a safe procedure, and whether or not to have an abortion should be a decision left up to the woman and her doctor.
07-08-2023
Teresa Whitaker []
CON
How arrogant and ignorant to think you, as a legislator, know what is better for a womans reproductive health than a woman and her doctor.
07-08-2023
Tena Gaskill []
CON
STOP TAKING AWAY OUR FREEDOM'S. ABORTION IS HEALTH CARE. BRINGING A CHILD INTO THE WORLD IS A PERSONAL CHOICE. DEFEND THIS CHOICE. TAKE YOUR OPINION OUT OF YOUR VOTE. YOU WERE ELECTED TO REPRESENT THE PEOPLE. VOTE NO. NO.
07-08-2023
Douglas Gustafson []
CON
GOP President Ronald Reagan always said "Get the government off my back!". Well, a woman's reproductive system is even more private and personal than her back. Stop being hypocrites and get out of our bodies!If you are going to go against the belief of a supermajority of Iowans (over 60% are prochoice), then know this bill will cost the GOP dearly in 2024. We, the majority, are tired of Republicans leaning away from democracy and toward dictatorship.Also, why doesn't Reynolds modify her bill to prevent the sale of ED meds and vasectomies? Or put the issue to a public referendum? Afraid you'll lose, badly?Republicans reject our state motto, "Our liberties we prize, our rights we will maintain." They call a special session to strip away another right that we have enjoyed for over 50 years. First, they gut our unions (well for teachers and nurses, predominately female), take away public money for private schools, violating our First Amendment right to keep religion and government apart, they reject public safety by catering to gun advocates, and in echoes of Nazi Germany, ban books!
07-08-2023
Roxanna White [Citizen of the State of Iowa]
CON
The State of Iowa should not interfere with a woman's right to determine what health care measures she requires. The authoritarian nature of such measures is astounding. I have always been proud to be an Iowan. This type of action (and others that deny people rights) is shameful. These measures will induce younger people to leave our state, as all legislatures well know. Every politician who supports this control should be ashamed. To push your own religious agenda as law is antiAmerican.
07-08-2023
Allison Simpson [Go For Roe]
CON
I am writing to express my deep concern regarding Iowa's recently proposed abortion ban. This restrictive legislation severely limits women's reproductive rights and infringes upon their autonomy and bodily autonomy.By effectively banning abortions after just six weeks, before many women even realize they are pregnant, this law disregards the complexities of individual circumstances and medical decisions. It fails to consider cases of rape, incest, or potential health risks to the mother, denying women the ability to make choices that are best for their own lives and wellbeing.Moreover, this ban disproportionately affects lowincome individuals who may face additional barriers in accessing healthcare, particularly in rural areas where abortion providers are already scarce. It further exacerbates existing disparities in reproductive healthcare, particularly impacting marginalized communities and those with limited resources.Rather than supporting comprehensive sex education, accessible contraceptives, and healthcare services, this legislation focuses on punitive measures that do not address the underlying issues. It is crucial to prioritize comprehensive reproductive healthcare and empower women to make informed decisions about their bodies and futures.I urge you to reconsider this regressive law and work towards policies that promote reproductive freedom, respect personal choices, and ensure access to safe and legal abortions. It is essential to protect women's rights, healthcare, and bodily autonomy.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
PRO
I completely support HSB 255Life is detected with a heart beatPlease pass this bill! Life is so important to Iowans
07-08-2023
Anonymous [Go For Roe]
CON
Reproductive rights are human rights and women deserve the right to choices over their bodies. Abortion is and always will be healthcare!!
07-08-2023
Allison Schoonover [none]
PRO
Abortion is not healthcare; it is the murder of an unborn child. It is an act of violence against a mother and her child, and it comes with lifelong physical, mental, emotional, and spiritual consequences. We, as a culture, have believed the lie that abortion an easy and painless solution to the "problem" of pregnancy. In truth, our culture is being destroyed by abortion. It is the duty of this legislature to protect women and their unborn children from abortion by enacting laws like this heartbeat bill. It is our duty, as friends, neighbors, church members, and citizens of our local communities to find ways to support women throughout their pregnancies and beyond so that abortion is no longer the "easy" solution.
07-08-2023
Lora Koch []
CON
As a mother and grandmother and a Christian, I have seen firsthand the critical importance of leaving the decision of terminating a pregnancy to the woman and her doctor. You are grossly overstepping your position as elected officials to consider a chance in Iowas current abortion laws. While I do believe there can be limits to when a pregnancy can be ended, the proposal of fetal heartbeat around six weeks is completely unreasonable. I know a young girl who was sexually abused by a step father and uncle, you cant possibly expect her to carry a pregnancy to term. Or my friend with a very wanted pregnancy who experienced preclampsia and had to terminate to save her own life but too early to save the baby. My point is, you do not walk in the shoes of each and every woman who faces this difficult decision. This law is a judgment against women to make their own decisions. Please vote NO!
07-08-2023
RC Eichacker [Retired, Self-employed]
CON
As a retired and former marriage and family therapist, I recommend, encourage and sincerely ask you to not change or alter our state's abortion access status at this time or in the near future.If you further restrict the rules of alternative behavior for society on this topic, suggest an indepth selfexamination session to analyze your action and feelings toward women and our society in general. Can assist in making a referral.
07-08-2023
Lindsay Maher [None]
PRO
Life begins at conception. It is the governments role to protect the natural rights of its citizens including the unborn. The right to life comes before liberty and the pursuit of happiness because without life there are no rights to protect. The fact we are still having this conversation in Iowa is frustrating for those who understand science and/or are Christians. It is time to move beyond this bill and protect life at conception. Iowans, especially republicans, expect more to be done to protect innocent unborn lives.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Abortion bans take away a fundamental right to make decisions about a womans healthcare and control of her own body. It takes away power over their own lives and their futures. It should be a decision between a woman and her doctor. Please vote no. You represent the will of the people.
07-08-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
Why is it so important to RAM this legislation through and remove another right from women and their health as well as the health and welfare of an unwanted child?Equitable access to safe abortion services is first and foremost a human right. Governments should respect a womans human right to make decisions regarding her reproductive life. These rights are no less compromised when a woman who decides to terminate a pregnancy can do so only by undertaking a serious risk to her life and health. It is contradictory to remove the right (ban) of women to have an abortion but allow anyone the right to have access to guns of all kinds. Apparently legislators value guns and gun rights more than they value the rights and lives of women and children.
07-08-2023
Kelli Wolf [None]
CON
Please keep healthcare decisions between a person and her doctor. This legislation is religious and not supported by the majority of Iowans. A person with a uterus should have as much authority over her body as a person with a penis does.
07-08-2023
Anonymous [Self]
CON
This bill does more harm than good. Let people make decisions about their own bodies and have the government stay out of it. One woman choosing to get an abortion should be that womans choice alone and not a choice that is forced upon her by someone elses beliefs.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Government should not be allowed to enact laws that impact my reproductive health. My reproductive health is between me, my husband and my health care provider and no one else. I dont need, nor want my government to have the final say in how I choose to manage my own health. Please allow women the freedom to make their own choices. Thank you.
07-08-2023
Terri Johnson Parker [Self]
CON
This bill is not about life but rather political control. This bill does not reflect the beliefs of the majority of Iowans. Sixtyone percent of Iowa adults say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while 35% say the procedure should be illegal in most or all cases. More than twothirds of Iowa women, 70%, say abortion should be legal in most or all cases. Reproductive rights are essential for women to enjoy their human rights. These rights are centered on womens ability to make the best choices for their lives, including around the number of children they have, if any, and the spacing between their childrens births. Reproductive rights include prenatal services, safe childbirth, and access to contraception. They also include access to legal and safe abortion. Abortion bans violate the rights to be free from violence, to privacy, to family, to health, and even the right to life. And bans are most devastating for people of color, young people, and marginalized communities, who already have trouble accessing health care and other needed services. Governments should trust women to know what is best for their bodies, their physical and mental health, and their lives.
07-08-2023
Christa Jensen [Planned Parenthood]
CON
Please, please do not pass this bill!! Keep women's health decisions up to women not men, not government. It's up to a woman and her doctor and not someone else. Let us NOT go backwards to shame, coat hangers, etc. Let us be a forward facing country that we are proud to live in.
07-08-2023
Jeanne Bancroft []
CON
I strongly oppose HSB 255. It is critical that pregnant persons maintain control over their individual health care. Healthcare decisions are for the individual, the family and the doctor, not the STATE! When the early bill was passed, it may not have been obvious what the consequences could be. Now we all have personal stories of women being told to go sit in the parking lot until they are "sick enough" for the doctors in these states with the extreme abortion laws to treat. That is inhumane. Not one of you would want your family member to be given that direction by healthcare workers. The ramifications of this extreme bill reach beyond termination of pregnancy to patients trying to get care to manage miscarriage for example. Please do not allow Iowa to become a state where women are not allowed to get healthcare they need or where doctors do not want to practice.
07-08-2023
Tammy Calhoun []
CON
The government has no business making policy that dictates what I do with my body or when I choose to start a family:
07-08-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
There are so many things wrong with this bill it's impossible to list them all here. This bill will kill Iowans who have already been born. It will cause immeasurable harm in countless ways to people who are already born and living full lives. We have watched other states enact similar bans and can see first hand the harm it causes the pregnant people whose bodies are treated like nothing more than chattel, wholly subservient to the embryo or fetus that use their body to survive. We've seen how victims of rape and incest must be further traumatized by a system that either requires them to disclose their trauma or tells them that if they don't, it and them don't matter. We've seen how doctors are hesitant to save the lives of pregnant people because they aren't close to death enough for the doctor to feel they can save their life for fear of losing their livelihood or their freedom. We've seen pregnant people choose to end their own lives rather than endure nine months of what, for them, would be hell on earth followed by the worst pain a person can feel, for hours on end. We've seen Republicans turn their backs on those who do choose to go through with their pregnancy, calling them leeches on the system, refusing to ensure they have access to the medical care necessary to endure this process and what comes after it, refuse to ensure the child they advocated for so viciously before they are born has enough food to eat after their born, or has a safe place to attend school free from gun violence, or lives in an area free from pollution and hazardous materials. The hypocrisy would be astounding if it wasn't so common. The Iowa GOP found masks during a global pandemic to be too invasive; how then can forcing a person to be pregnant for nine months and then go through hours of labor not be even more invasive?? Governor Reynolds said she trusts Iowans over and over again when giving them the right to make their own decisions about vaccines and public gatherings. But you don't trust them to make this incredibly personal decision?? You want government so small that you're rolling back decades of child labor protections but you want it big enough to stand between a pregnant person and their doctor?? Governor Reynolds aligns herself with domestic terrorist organizations like Moms For Liberty who claim they don't "coparent" with the state, but here the state sure seems comfortable "coparenting" with pregnant people, so long as the parenting style is the one they support. This law is cowardly because you won't lift a finger to actually help the children who are already born, you won't lift a finger to help the pregnant person before, during, or after pregnancy. You won't even listen to the majority of Iowans who do not support this legislation.
07-08-2023
Karla Hurley [Private citizen]
CON
Our governors religious beliefs and personal agenda should not be allowed to take away the rights of generations of women in Iowa. People who dont like abortion are free to not have one but that doesnt mean the a vital healthcare option should be ripped away from womens to appease the religious right. Its truly deplorable.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Over forty years ago, I became pregnant even though I was using an IUD. I was advised by a doctor to have an abortion. I took some time to think about his recommendation, discussed it with my husband, and made the decision to keep the baby, trusting that the baby would be fine; he was. My point is that I had a choice. Laws banning abortion will not stop abortionsas long as people have sex, there will be unwanted pregnancies and therefore, abortions. What abortion bans stop is a woman's right to choose a safe abortion. Rich women will always be able to go wherever they need to go to get a safe abortion. Poor women will not have that ability. Rich women will fly, poor women will die.
07-08-2023
Lindsay Maher [None]
PRO
Life begins at conception. It is the governments role to protect the natural rights of its citizens including the unborn. The right to life comes before liberty and the pursuit of happiness because without life there are no rights to protect. The fact we are still having this conversation in Iowa is frustrating for those who understand science and/or are Christians. It is time to move beyond this bill and protect life at conception. Iowans, especially republicans, expect more to be done to protect innocent unborn lives.
07-08-2023
Kathi [Bower]
CON
This is not something legislators should have anything to do with. Leave medical decision making to patients and their doctors.
07-08-2023
Donna Hirst [Johnson County Interfaith Coalition]
CON
Women have the right to make their own decisions about their bodies in conjunction with their physician and family members. State or national governmental bodies have no right to restrict access to reproductive health care.
07-08-2023
Em Kapler []
CON
To whom it may concern,Any representatives who are considering passing this legislation need to educate themselves about human development. Please visit https://myanetwork.org/theissueoftissue/ and look at the images of the "baby" from 5 weeks to 9 weeks. This mass of tissue is not viable and cannot survive without its host. It is not a person; to give this tissue more rights than a living, breathing woman is so beyond the pale I do not have a word heinous enough to apply to it. It is *NEVER* acceptable to deprive people of basic human rights and that is what this legislation will do force women and others who can become pregnant to be host to this tissue and give birth against their will. I do not support statesanctioned slavery due to pregnancy and I do not support statesanctioned forced birth. I happily go on record stating I will aid and abet any pregnant person who stands against such dehumanizing, antiAmerican laws should they come to pass. Em
07-08-2023
Amanda Greubel []
CON
Please vote NO on HSB 255 and any other attempts to limit womens healthcare options in the state of Iowa. Requiring a woman to continue a pregnancy against her will is akin to requiring a person to donate an organ to someone who will die without it. We believe in bodily autonomy, so dont expect anyone to use their body to keep another alive in this way. The same right must be accorded to pregnant people in the state of Iowa.
07-08-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
If this bill had been in effect 10 years ago, I would have died from inadequate medical care, and my two children would not have been born. I have the spiritual and physical capability of making my own reproductive decisions, and the State has no right to force me to bear children against my will. That is the stuff of dystopian nightmares. Vote against this bill.
07-08-2023
Margaret Cretzmeyer []
CON
This is a medical issue not a political issue and not a religious issue. Politicians do not have the understanding of the medical issues involved here and have no business intruding on these medical decisions. Womens lives are on the line here. This bill is complete over reach on the part the Republican majority in this unfortunate congress.
07-08-2023
Mike Schluckebier []
CON
I am against this bill because it is morally wrong. Forcing someone to give birth against their will can never be something a legitimate government compels. Additionally, though, it violates the US Constitution. In violation of the first amendment, it codifies a specific interpretation of Christian belief, preventing those of other interpretations, other faiths, and nonbelievers from exercising their rights. In violation of the eighth amendment, it imposes the cruel and unusual punishment of childbirth on women who do not wish to continue a pregnancy and in fact have committed no crime. In violation of the thirteen amendment, it forces involuntary servitude to the state again on women who have committed no crime. And in violation of the fourteenth amendment, it prevents women from making autonomous healthcare decisions, something that is never disallowed for men. If you believe that women should be equal participants in society and believe in limited government, you will not support this bill.
07-08-2023
Miriam Kashia []
CON
Women's rights over our bodies is fundamental. It is a private matter between a woman/girl and her physician. PERIOD !! No religious or cultural ideology can take precedence.
07-08-2023
Anonymous [Self]
CON
I disagree with the Givernor's call for the end of abortion in Iowa. Abortion is an option that is between a woman and her physician. Never known a woman to seek lightly. Besides Iowa is becoming a sa state of revenge legislation. Leave the law as it stands. Thank you
07-08-2023
Maureen Montgomery []
CON
I am against this bill. Women should be able to choose what they do with their own bodies.
07-08-2023
Catelin Drey [Citizen]
CON
This bill is dangerous, not grounded in science and wildly unpopular.
07-08-2023
Jessica Van Dalen [N/A]
CON
Our governor was big on my body my choice when it came to wearing masks during this centuries worst pandemic and now she wants to go back on that when it comes to womens choice. No governing body should overstep the power of medical professionals nor strip bodily autonomy away. The GOP only cares about mental health when it comes to their guns, but not when it comes to forcing a person to bear an unwanted fetus. The hypocrisy is loud and childish. Its time for Iowa to actually stand up for its citizens and do what is truly best for them and stop with these ridiculous games.
07-08-2023
Abby Michael []
CON
A "fetal heartbeat bill" is misleading, uneducated, and unscientific. Any restriction or ban on abortion access in Iowa is an attack on every Iowan's bodily autonomy and right to choose if and when to be pregnant or become parents. This bill will increase Iowa's maternal mortality rate, especially for our black mothers who are six times more likely to die than their white counterparts. This is unAmerican and unacceptable.
07-08-2023
Claudia Boss [NA]
CON
Taking away a 50 year right of women is returning women to 2nd class citizens. Abortion is a choice to be made by a woman in conjunction with whomever she chooses. The economic and educational stresses not being able to make a choice are huge. Unfortunately most against abortion say they are prolife. This is a lie. They are probirth. Prolifers would support supplemental nutrition for poor families, supplemental housing and early education.
07-08-2023
Lynnae Lathrop []
CON
Abortion is not an issue with just two sides. There are so many gray areas. This ban would create medical gray areas where doctors can't make the correct medical decision for a woman with a failing pregnancy. There are too many moments when a woman needs abortion as an option to end a pregnancy that has gone wrong or a miscarriage that is endangering her life. In cases where doctors must wait for the fetal heartbeat to stop while the woman suffers both physical and mental anguish of a nonviable pregnancy is pure cruelty. That is just one of the horrible situations this bill will create if passed. Women in Texas are starting to speak out about the risky delays and complications they have faced for conditions such as ectopic pregnancies, incomplete miscarriages, placental issues, and premature rupture of membranes. We already have the highest maternal death rate of any North American or European country. Why would the representatives of our state choose to add to the dangers of pregnancy? Why would we want to make a married woman who has been told she shouldn't have children due to a preexisting condition be forced to carry a child to term at risk of her own life because her birth control failed? We need to allow ALL women to make the decisions that fit their life circumstances. The existence of these gray areas is proof that this ban should NOT be approved. Please let women control their own medical decisions and their own lives. This ban won't stop abortions from happening. It will only result in more women dying from the lack of medical help when they need it. Vote NO to banning abortion in Iowa.
07-08-2023
Marcia Korenberg []
CON
I'm an Iowan who felt the despair of women in the 60s because women's health care was determined by their father or husband. We cannot go back. A woman's right to choose when she wants to become a parent is and always must be her choice. I vehemently oppose Governor Reynolds personal agenda to remove that right to choose.
07-08-2023
Anonymous [none]
CON
It is time our legislature, as well as several others, stop practicing medicine without a license. Those proposing such laws as the one to be presented here have no idea of the medical ramifications of these laws which put women at great risk. All these laws do is drive reproductive care away from this state and many of its citizens as well.
07-08-2023
Anonymous [Myself]
CON
This issue is not black and white. You must take into consideration situations where abortion is an absolute medical necessity to save the life of a mother in cases where the child will be born with no quality of life. You are hurting the living mothers of Iowa if you look at this as a black and white issue.
07-08-2023
Josephine O'Donnell []
CON
Is the Governor and Republican majority in the legislature ready to have the horror stories similar to other states start pouring out of Iowa? Women, their families, and their providers unable to treat pregnancy emergencies until they're on death's door? Women and girls who have been endured rape or incest being further traumatized by having their say over what happens to their own bodies further taken away from them?Are they ready to face Iowans and try to justify their inhumane, cruel, extremist position on abortion healthcare? Or will they try to hide from us because of the shame of not standing up for the women and girls in their own lives?
07-08-2023
Mike Tramontina [Iowa citizen]
CON
Personal health including abortion is a personal issue and women and their doctors should have freedom to decide without governmental interference.
07-08-2023
Debra Parker []
CON
Women in Iowa deserve freedom of choice!
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This bill clearly and plainly tells the women of Iowa their healthcare DOESNT matter to Kim Reynolds and to the Republicans in our state legislature. While a womans right to terminate a pregnancy should remain private and should not be dictated by our government, the Republicans supporting this bill are twisting the knife by voting AGAINST the will of their constituents. The majority of Iowans do NOT support restrictions on abortions and the legislators who are vote yes to this bill are negligent in their obligations to voters. It is absolutely unacceptable that a fetus is more important to this society than the well being of living, breathing human beings. This bill is an act of suppression and hostility towards women and the progress weve made in our pursuit for equality. It is time every single one of our representatives is held accountable for their clear dismissal of the will of this community and for a womens right to healthcare.
07-08-2023
Kim Schaal []
CON
I fully support reproductive rights for all people.
07-08-2023
Judith and David Leavitt [ ]
CON
When the majority of Iowans favor a woman's right to choose her own health care, why is Governor Reynolds continuing to push for denying this basic right to the women of Iowa?Who is funding this push by the Governor? and why?At the next election, I hope Iowans will oust Governor Reynolds and end her assault on the right rights of iowans.
07-08-2023
Denise Perez [Self]
CON
Access to an abortion at 19 allowed me the opportunity to get my life in order. When I became pregnant again at the age of 29 I had a stable job, income, medical insurance, and the maturity to break the cycle of trauma in my family. I have absolutely no regrets or shame as an abortion was the absolute best decision for me when I was 19.Pregnancy is a very personal situation that does not need interference from the government. How about focusing on gun violence, poverty and homelessness. There are so many other things we need to fix in Iowa, leave abortion decisions to patients and doctors.
07-08-2023
Gail [Halloran]
CON
My faith does not call me to abstinence nor does it prohibit abortion. Your faith should not supercede mine. Please let women decide their own reproductive choices. No one is forcing any woman to have an abortion and no woman should be forced to carry a pregnancy to term. This is a fundamental freedom for every woman that should be respected. Closing the door to reproductive freedom disproportionately impacts women with fewer economic choices, the women who need the most support.
07-08-2023
Carrie Z. Norton [League of Women Voters]
CON
I support a woman's right to choose and a doctor's right to treat regarding women's reproductive functions
07-08-2023
Rachel Rovine []
CON
It will a very, very big mistake to ban abortion in Iowa. Healthcare is a fundamental right for everyone regardless. The income which I know you house Republican care about lost from treating women and the education for doctors at universities would be horrible. Not just that but the doctors and nurses that treat women will be in jeopardy. For what?But thats not just all. You cannot control women at the governors whim. It unconscionable it backward thinking. We do not live in 1950. We will not accept this.
07-08-2023
Deb Scott-Miller []
CON
Access to abortion is health care for women. By denying our ability to make our own choices for our own health care, you are denying us our human rights. Health care is a decision made between an individual and their doctor.
07-08-2023
Dr Ann Valentine []
CON
I am opposed to the proposed legislation. Every woman should make medical decisions for her own body in consultation with her family and her physician, not the state.
07-08-2023
Anonymous [RETIRED IOWAN]
CON
PLEASE TAKE THIS INTO CONSIDERATION WHEN WORKING ON LEGISLATION REGARDING ABORTION. THE MAJORITY OF FELLOW IOWANS ARE IN FAVOR OF LEGAL ABORTION IN OUR STATE AND BELIEVE THIS IS AN ISSUE BETWEEN A WOMAN AND HER DOCTOR. I THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR SUPPORTING LEGISLATION THAT MATCHES YOUR STATEWIDE CONSTITUENCY.
07-08-2023
Anna-Maria P Cornell [None]
CON
There is no freedom without the freedom NOT to be pregnant. Anything less than that is reproductive slavery. A free person should be the only one to decide if and when to reproduce. Leave State out of reproductive decisions, or you are nothing but imposing your will and values on others. That is not freedom and that is shameful for a country that claims to be the land of the free. Stop it!
07-08-2023
Russell Reineke []
PRO
Hi Brian,I previously emailed you this spring about my support of this bill or one similar to it. You were kind enough to respond that you were waiting to see how the Iowa Supreme Court ruled on a challenge to another abortion ban legislation.Although I believe that abortion should be banned other than for saving the life of the mother, I believe this bill is a step forward in the right direction from current legislation.I fully support this legislation and am asking for you to do the same by voting "yes" on this bill.Thank you for all you do to support life.Russ Reineke,Carroll, Iowacell: 712 830 2550
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Abortion should be legal. I am fiercely against the current attempt to outlaw abortion. Such prohibition is barbaric. If the Iowa legislature passes this bill, many people like me will leave the state. I cannot live under such cruelty. The brain drain that is already occurring in Iowa will accelerate. Does anyone believe that the best doctors and teachers and professors and other professionals of all sorts will want to live in Iowa? When I was building a family I underwent an abortion in California, where there were zero barriers to this important form of healthcare. My doctors were enormously supportive. I will not live in an Iowa that heads in the exact opposite direction.I oppose this theocratic barbarism.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am against the Reproductive Act. The key word I am interested in is "choice". Women need to have a choice when it comes to reproduction. Our democratic country needs to allow women to make that choice.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Your law will make it impossible for women to make necessary health decisions regarding their reproductive system. You risk killing women by forcing them to carry a fetus rather than do what's best for their body. You risk the lives of women of all ages, all economic strata and all political beliefs. Except we all know that women who have money and resources will find their way around this law. Stop interfering with women's health choices.
07-08-2023
Eric Gidal []
CON
I'm appalled at the craven hypocrisy of those who seek to control women and their bodies in the name of faith. Should we not work to heal our social fabric and help one another instead of making illegal a practice as old as human history. The state government has no business dictating such personal matters for their citizens. I urge rejection of this bill.
07-08-2023
Mary Jobst R. N. BSN []
PRO
I support legislation to protect preborn babies right to life. . The Constitution (including the Bill of Rights) GRANTS NO rights. They only enumerate rights which humans have by nature and restrict the government from infringing on those rights. Any child who has life, born or unborn, has the right to have that life protected. The government cannot take away that right because the government didn't grant it. What the government can take away is active protection of that life.It is an irrefutable fact that human life begins at conception. At that moment, a unique, whole, human being comes into existence.Nothing needs to be added except a nourishing environment for this tiny human being to grow and develop into an adult. Size, level of development, environment, and degree of dependency are irrelevant to the innate value each one of us human beings. ABORTION is NOT HEALTHCARE. Its purpose is to kill , not to protect health. For the vast majority of women, pregnancy is a normal healthy condition that lasts approximately nine months. We should provide necessary support to mothers and fathers who are experiencing a surprise pregnancy and encourage public commitment of marriage to raise their children. Mothers who feel they cannot parent their baby can also consent to adoption. The adverse psychological effects of killing their children by abortion on the mother can be devastating. There is never a medical reason to INTENTIONALLY KILL the preborn baby by abortion to save the life of the mother. In those situations it may be medically necessary to separate the baby from the mother. If the baby is too premature to survive, he/she can be allowed to die with dignity naturally in the arms of loving parents in those rare heartbreaking situations. Intentionally Killing a preborn baby conceived in rape by abortion is compounding one crime with another by giving the death penalty to an innocent victim( the baby) and turning the mother from a victim into a killer of her own child. The time is now. Do the right thing. Protect life!
07-08-2023
Gail Zlatnik [None]
CON
I wonder whether Gov. Reynolds has ever spoken with a woman for whom abortion access was important. Perhaps someone like Joni Ernst, a Republican also, and who was sexually assaulted in college, might be willing to share her story. Not all women speak of the sanctity of human life," a religious expression, but all of know that the decision to launch a human life is humankind's most momentous point of no return. Can Kim see herself giving away a baby shes nurtured for 9 months? Can she imagine wondering every day about the fate of that child? Unless she takes parenthood very lightly, she knows that the raising of a child is a responsibility without equal. The woman who knows, for whatever reason, thats a job she cant handle at a given time, should be supported, not stymied, and comforted, not met with platitudes and false reassurance.
07-08-2023
Susan Futrell []
CON
Decisions about health care, including abortion, pregnancy and reproductive health, are profoundly personal choices, made in unique and personal conditions and situations. Women in Iowa have the right to make those decisions in consultation with their doctor, health care provider, family and family of choice, without oppressive interference by lawmakers who think they should make those choices for everyone else. The proposed bill goes against that right, against the wishes and beliefs of the majority of Iowans, and against the health and safety of women and children. It is cruel, cynical and hypocritical for Gov. Reynolds and state GOP leaders to bring this bill forward, knowing it is not supported by the majority of Iowans and knowing that it contradicts their own rhetoric about the role of government and individual rights. Women in Iowa will not give up the right to determine their own health, safety, happiness and future. I urge you not to take this step backward; it will be temporary if you do, because the rest of Iowa is moving forward toward a different future.
07-08-2023
Annette Epperson []
CON
This should not be a decision made by the state legislature. This should be a vote by the people.
07-08-2023
Sally Nelson []
PRO
Neither the State of Iowa or the Federal government has a say in what I do with my body! It is my God given right to free will and NO Government has a right to decide for me!
07-08-2023
07-08-2023
Amy Gardner [NA]
CON
Abortion is Health Care!
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Keep abortion legal!! Women are going to die, mothers, wives, are going to die!
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Let women control their own bodies.
07-08-2023
Clare [N/A]
CON
This bill is an abomination. Women are capable of making their own medical decisions and politicians have absolutely no business making laws about this type of medical care. Disgusting!
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
As a proud Iowan and Women's Health Nurse I am against restricting women's Healthcare. Abortion is healthcare, and the founding fathers of our great nation intended on separation of church and state. I believe that restricting abortions is an overreach of religious beliefs leaking into laws. Any kind of healthcare should be between the healthcare provider and their patient NOT between the government and physicians. If you don't want an elective abortion don't have one, but don't make it so illegal that women lose control of their own bodies and their future. We aren't supposed to be going backwards in time, we are supposed to progress forward and that includes the right to healthcare.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
When governments start holding men at least equally responsible for pregnancies, then they can consider how pregnancies of adult females should be regulated.
07-08-2023
Christine Ogren []
CON
This bill severely restricts women's rights. Decisions regarding women's health should be made by women and their doctorsnot the state legislature. The majority of Iowans support abortion rights. Please do not pass this bill!
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Repeated independent surveys show that the majority of Iowans as well as atge majority of all Americans support a womans right to make medical personal decisions for herself and do not agree with the Supreme Court reversal of Roe vs. Wade.
07-08-2023
Anonymous [Citizen]
CON
I honestly don't even know what to say. Although I think my morethanadecade of infertility, three spontaneous abortions, and watching my infant daughter die from catastrophic birth defects qualifies me to speak on this issue.My husband and I never got the family we prayed for; we are 0 for 4. Instead, I will now battle severe chronic pain, illness, and autoimmune conditions for the rest of my life, and my husband has been thrown into a caregiver role I feel guilty for every day.Had I received better support during the lifethreatening situation with our daughter, I may have decided on what would have been the better choice to terminate the pregnancy. Let her go with mercy and dignity, and allow myself to live a fuller life.At 38 years old, I am emotionally, physically, mentally, and spiritually damaged beyond repair. But because of my story, I REFUSE to let another pregnant person go through what I did.Pregnancy is often a lifethreatening medical condition that should never be regulated by the government. As if the lies, misinformation, and fear the right wing and the evangelical church spreads isn't bad enough, you have no business telling a pregnant person what they should do with their body. It is NONE of your business, and should only be discussed between the pregnant person and their doctor someone with a medical degree. Last I checked, none of you had those credentials.I am vehemently against HSB 255. I genuinely hope you will reconsider, stand with the majority of Iowans, and vote "no." If you don't, there will undoubtedly be blood on your hands.
07-08-2023
Jesse Van Dalen [NA]
CON
Freedom, Freedom of Religion, Freedom of Choice. Separation from Church and State. The Consitution. Whoever is trying to pass this bill and wants to pass this bill, needs to reread or more than likely just read. The Constitution and the definitions of all of these words. Freedom is the power or right to act, speak, or think as one wants without hindrance or restraint. Passing this bill will take away Womens and Childrens freedoms. Yes, children. There are children who get impregnated by unspeakable acts. Many Women and Children who are alive will die as a result of this bill. Many women and Children will have fertility issues in the future as a result of the consequences from this bill being passed. There is more problems that can even be explained that this bill will cause. The government officials dont even have the required knowledge of abortion let alone pregnancy to make this call on abortion. This needs to be left up to the pregnant person at the time and the options given by the Medical Professionals. There is much more that needs to be said but non of these voices and words will ever be heard by people blinded by ignorance. All of this will just fall into the sounds of silence.
07-08-2023
Susan Corbin-Muir []
CON
Abortion is a medical procedure that should be safe and legal. The decision to have an abortion should be made by the patient and the doctor. Guard a womans right to make decisions about her body. Keep all such decisions in the hands of medical professionals.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
What happened to separation of church and state? This is a spiritual issue between the individuals involved and God. The antichoice people are trying to force everyone to live by their definition of life and God. This type of ban eats away at our right to religious freedom.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This is ridiculous. You bellyache about taking care of accidental kids and try to keep them coming. This is just another political stunt.
07-08-2023
Adam Campbell []
CON
This is wrong on do many levels.The majority of Iowans don't support it, it's antidemocracy.It takes away people's bodily autonomy and personal freedom. This will lead to increases in maternal mortality. If Republicans cared for life, this is the wrong direction. Put money into family planning and sex ed, not bans.The governor is acting like a bully, demanding compliance in exchange for political support.Keep religious ideas out of government.
07-08-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
I support safe, accessible reproductive healthcare, including abortion, and bodily autonomy, as do a majority of Iowans. I trust women and their families to make the right reproductive healthcare decisions for themselves, in consultation with their physicians. Politicians should not be involved. Use of the term fetal heartbeat at 6 weeks is deliberately misleading propaganda, designed to manipulate emotions. At 6 weeks, there is no fetus and there is no heart. These are scientific facts. At 6 weeks of gestation, heart valves dont exist in an embryo. The flickering seen on an ultrasound that early in a pregnancy is electrical activity, and the sound that is "heard" is actually manufactured by the ultrasound machine. Pregnant people across the country are undergoing ongoing, lifethreatening medical crises since 50 years of precedent was overturned by the radical majority on the Supreme Court and Republican led states quickly enacted strict abortion bans like the 6 week ban. What pregnant persons and their families have been forced to endure while undergoing medical emergencies caused by unviable pregnancies is absolutely chilling. Torture, trauma, permanent reproductive organ damage that may prevent them from ever having children in the future. Is this the future politicians want for Iowans?
07-08-2023
Rebecca Porter []
CON
I am a Registered Nurse scholar who has earned a PhD (from the University of Iowa). The government of Iowa has absolutely NO BUSINESS interfering in the relationship between a woman and the medical doctor or nurse providing health care to anyone including women choosing to terminate a pregnancy. As a Registered Nurse, I am morally obliged to follow the American Nurses Association Code of Ethics. The first (of nine provisions) states that I must advocate for my patient. The last 3 provisions argue for my responsibilities to uphold human rights as articulated in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. If my patient requests or medically NEEDS to terminate a pregnancy, I am morally (and legally) obliged to advocate for her healthcare. If I disagree with her choice or the proposed medical procedure to terminate the pregnancy, I can recuse myself. I am attaching an editorial written by recognized nurse scholars one of whom is a Christian and holds both a PhD in Nursing and a Masters Degree in Divinity and another PHD RN JD. They argue for the protection of women's access to medical interventions in pregnancies as a documented Human Right. This proposed law reflects the choices of extremist Christians not any mainstream world religion (Christianity, Judaism, or Islam). Please do everything you can to oppose this bill and protect the lives of women in Iowa.
Attachment
07-08-2023
Marlene Runyon []
CON
I supportive reproductive freedom for all.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Why are you trying to take away the rights and freedoms of half our population?
07-08-2023
CHRISTY RICKERS []
CON
It is unconstitutional to put limits on what a woman does with her own body.
07-08-2023
Matt Busche []
CON
The choice to have an abortion should be made between the pregnant person and their Doctor. No one else.
07-08-2023
Lori Hackett [ ]
CON
I am a Care Manager with a Masters Degree and have worked in Human Services for over 40 years.I remember the illegal abortions. I have worked with clients who have been raped. I worked with client with Tay Sachs syndrome whose child was dying from the day it was born.Taking away the right of the patient and physician to make the best informed medical decision is just wrong. Women need to have the right to control their own body and destiny. Political interference and the imposition of one sect religious values isMisguided and wrong.
07-08-2023
Adrienne Nguyen [Speaking as an individual]
CON
I urge the legislation to oppose HSB 255. As a current medical student in the state of Iowa, I am a part of the vast majority of Iowans who are against any further restrictions or ban on abortion. The people of Iowa deserve the fundamental right to proper healthcare. Threatening to take away this right will only further harm women and their families. The American Medical Associations press release in 2022 announced its stance recognizing that any restrictions against abortions is a violation of human rights. The government has no qualifications to interfere with the private and confidential medical decisions between a patient and physician. Imposing restrictions on abortion will further impede all Iowans access to safe and evidencebased reproductive health services and procedures. According to Planned Parenthood, Iowa is already considered a reproductive health care desert by the Guttmacher Institute, which estimates more than 310,000 Iowans need publicly funded contraceptive services and supplies. Fewer Iowans who are lowertomiddle income have access to health care today, state maternal mortality rates are higher than they were 30 years ago, and unintended pregnancies are increasing along with the rate of sexually transmitted infections (STIs).Additional bans and restrictions would harmfully exacerbate this dire lack of care.In conclusion, without access to safe abortions, your constituents WILL die. This is a life and death situation, and to make light of that is a cruel use of your ignorance. If you cant understand the deadly repercussion of a total abortion ban, you have no place making these decisions for the people of Iowa. Thank you.
07-08-2023
Julie Meachen [Self]
CON
This bill would take away important reproductive choices between a woman and her doctor. This bill is antiwoman and antireproductive freedom. The poorest Iowans will be harmed the most by this bill. Iowans do not want this bill!!
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
As a woman who came of age during Roe v Wade, I strongly support women's freedom of reproductive rights and her right to guide choices for herself and family, if appropriate, in consultation with her physician. For years abortions have been safe, done under physicians' guidance or using longtested, safe medications. Every woman should have the right to make her own decision. The Dobbs decision took away the right of EVERY woman to choose. Only those who are against abortion are supported with the decision; all other women now have no choice. I am against imposing beliefs of the few on the many (60% of Iowans support choice). This is not democracy and undoes 50 years of safe treatment for women and fetuses.
07-08-2023
Cathy Brimeyer []
CON
61% of Iowans in communities big and small, urban and rural believe abortion should be legal in Iowa. 61% of Iowans Republicans, Democrats, and Independents support safe and legal abortion. 61% of Iowans including people of all faiths and beliefs support the independence and bodily autonomy of every Iowan. As a member of that 61%, I am united in opposing any attempt to limit or ban the fundamental right to an abortion.Whether during a special or regular legislative session, I urge the Iowa Legislature to reject any effort that impedes the reproductive rights of Iowans and every attempt to restrict or ban abortion.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
A famous teacher said long ago, "He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone." John 8:7 KJV. I say, Now let anyone who is without sin cast your vote in favor of this bill.
07-08-2023
Lauri Jennisch []
CON
This bill is inconsistent with 50 years of legal precedent as well as the will of the majority of Iowans. It extreme and is being used by the current Republican political majority as a political tool at the expense of womens health and autonomy. If men were the persons impacted by this legislation, the Republican majority would very, very likely consider the issue the differently. But more importantly, please honor womens and familys right to make decisions about their deeply personal circumstances.
07-08-2023
Mike Henning [Private person]
CON
I support women's right to choose what is best in their life. Do not restrict abortions!!!
07-08-2023
Krystal Davidson []
CON
Forcing people to believe what you believe is unconstitutional.
07-08-2023
Elizabeth Bonillo-Ruth []
CON
Patients and physicians need assurances that they wont be accused of crimes for medically necessary treatment. Physicians and other healthcare professionals must attempt to comply with vague, restrictive, complex, and conflicting state laws that interfere in the practice of medicine.One of my best friends and her husband were trying for a baby. After 2 years and some reproductive assistance, my friend finally became pregnant. She decorated her baby room, bought little baby clothes was even getting ready for her baby shower. However, when she went in for her 12week ultrasound, all was not well. Her little bundle of joy had a devastating genetic defect where it would likely not survive to term. After some difficult conversations with her husband and physician, my friend ultimately elected to have an abortion. This was not only the most costeffective option, but emotionally too. My friend told me she no longer felt excited and joyful, but only remorse, guilt and grief and didn't want the baby to pass away while inside her. Her abortion went smoothly and she kept her little one's ashes as a token for the child who once was, but no longer is. In remembrance of that child, I fight for the right to respect family's and they're right to necessary healthcare.
07-08-2023
Joanna Sinnwell []
CON
States that restrict abortion have the highest maternal mortality rates in our nation. Restrictions will jeopardize the reproductive health of every single female in this state. How can you say you are pro life when you continually assault the freedoms and health of families and children in Iowa?
07-08-2023
Jan Gorman [LG LLC Consulting]
CON
Do not make any woman's life more difficult by removing their rights and health freedoms.
07-08-2023
Kathy Graeve []
CON
I and the majority of Iowans are opposed to extremist laws against women. This ban is dangerous to women and another attempt to minority rule in Iowa. Do not assume Iowans will forget how Republicans rammed through vouchers and now want to send women back to the dark ages.
07-08-2023
Tiffany DeBow [Citizen]
CON
We do not require dead people (even parents to their children) to donate their perfectly good organs that will just go to waste to sustain the life of another so we cannot force a living person to use their organs to sustain the life of another. We do not tell parents of terminally ill born children that they must continue treatment & life sustaining measures on their child. We cannot force parents of unborn terminally ill children that they must continue life sustaining measures. Both sets of parents have the right to decide what is best for their child in this most tragic of situations. We do not tell people with inflamed appendixes that they must wait until it bursts & their life is truly in danger to remove the appendix. We cannot tell women who are faced with a lifethreatening pregnancy condition that they must wait until it progresses to actually threatening their life to do something about it.This bill is cruel & discriminatory. It is based only on the ideas of "morality" of its writerspoliticians/political organizations, not the knowledge of experts or with the experiences of those who must endure the fallout from the loss of their rights in mind.
07-08-2023
Morgan Herring [Unaffiliated ]
CON
By banning abortion of any kind I think you are missing all the potential issues that will arise. 1) by criminalizing common OBGyn practice especially early stage abortions that are considered for the safety of the mother (but dont hit all the rigorous criteria that you have in this bill) you make them second guess all medical decisions and also worry that they will be charged with illegal acts for decisions that are in the best interest of the patient. No one will want to practice OBGyn in that environment which means fewer OBGyn for standard care of our moms and in Iowa we are already dangerously short on those providers. 2) when forcing people to have babies where does that cost go? Affluent people can afford abortions out of state. Poorer socioeconomic patients may not which means when this child is born it is a Medicaid patient so now we have more state funds going to that 3) you are not subsidizing this with any additional social measures that help these fetuses thrive after birth food stamps, daycare stipends, increasing minimum wage, expanding Medicaid access, free birth control, additional sex education. 4) the Republican Party should do research on the efficacy of birth control. Even in best use you still have a chance to get pregnant and until men are willing to create birth control for themselves this will always unfairly fall on a womens responsibility. There is so much gray area in this that it is impossible for you to put an all out ban and actually take care of Iowans. Maybe we should work on getting our women healthier so they can go into the workforce before we decide that they no longer have control over their own bodies as well as everything else in there lives.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Many women don't even know they are pregnant at six weeks. My personal stance has long been, "The government shouldn't legislate morality." I don't want to go back to the days of women hiding in back alleys to get mutilated and then potentially die. Considering the unexplainable high mortality rate of pregnant women in our advanced society, especially black women, some women are saving their own lives by getting an abortion! In addition, some of the pregnancies will selfterminate (miscarry), so leave the choice up to the woman, it's her life and body.Please honor the decades long moratorium on penalties for abortion. Whether her decision is good or bad, the woman will live with the consequences of her choice.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Iowa politicians need to stay out of the difficult decisions women need to make regarding ending a pregnancy. The decision should be left to the woman, her partner (if accepting responsibility), her doctor, and any other s she wished to involve.Stop interfering in these decisions!
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Do not pass laws affecting health care. Prenatal decisions up to and including termination of pregnancy should be left to the patient and qualified medical personnel acting in the best interest of the patient.Nobody starts surgery in the middle of the state house, do not start legislating in the middle of doctors' offices!
07-08-2023
Sandy Ethridgr []
CON
Appalled and frightened that IA is going this direction. Born and raised here and after almost 70 years, I am ashamed of this state. Sadly, I've seen it go down hill since Reagan. It's now reached rock bottom and below under the Reynolds' GOP court. We really are the FL of the Midwest. Democrats, speak out loudly and show your strength and determination. We need it more than ever in my lifetime. Wish I could be there to share in our right to protest!!!
07-08-2023
Carla Buckingham [Citizen]
CON
Women need toMake decisions about abortions and carrying a child. No government inference. Republicans need to realize all this!
07-08-2023
Rev. John H. Koopman [St. Paul and Peace Lutheran Churches]
PRO
Dear lawmakers of Iowa,Abortion is a vile evil that has been permitted and supported in our state for far too long. Abortion kills unborn babies in the womb. Abortion is the murder of unborn children. So many babies have been killed in our state. Lord have mercy upon us! It is incumbent upon you lawmakers to cease the murder of children in our state. You must pass this law and put an end the bloodshed. I pray that you have the strength to do what is right. If you vote against this and continue to condone the murder of innocents, then you must answer for this on judgement day.
07-08-2023
Jamie ORourke []
CON
Limiting abortion to 6 weeks wont stop abortions, it will stop legal and safe abortions. The Iowa legislature has shown they dont value childrens lives and well being, or they would have passed measures to expand child care and SNAP access, instead they did the opposite. This law is pandering to right wing extremism, most Iowans believe this is a decision between a woman and her doctor not her legislature. You must vote no. We can not let ourselves, our daughters and our grand daughters have fewer rights than we do today. When I was 25, I found myself pregnant. I had a college degree and could have left grad school to raise a kid, but thats not the future I wanted. The man I was with was not my forever. To link me to him for life through a kid neither of us wanted would have ruined not only our lives, but would have been unfair to the kid. Today, because I had a choice, I have a life I love filled with love. Shouldnt every child be wanted, not forced?
07-08-2023
Eli Wiklund [Citizen of Iowa]
CON
Let's like not do this please.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Pregnancy and outcomes is a personal decision and should be left to the individual and not dictated. Freedom to choose. I do not support this bill or our legislature taking action suppressing women's rights.
07-08-2023
Eliza Willis []
CON
I am strongly opposed to the proposed legislation limiting a woman's right to decide about her own healthcare. I am not alone in this view. Every survey taken on this subject has confirmed that a significant majority of Iowans favor protecting a woman's right to choose. The legislature would be acting in direct opposition to the popular will if it passes a fetal heartbeat bill. We now have evidence from other states that severe restrictions on the right to end a pregnancy after five weeks adversely affects women's health and has lead to many heartbreaking situations even for women who have planned their pregnancy. Given the amount of time required for many women to even recognize they are pregnant, limiting their right to end their pregnancy to five weeks essentially deprives them of a real choice. I urge you not to end this essential right for women in Iowa.
07-08-2023
John Gross [none]
CON
If your wife or daughter becomes ill' will you call a doctor or a farmer? Our legislatora are not able to make medical decisions so don't do it now.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
DO NOT BAN OR RESTRICT ABORTION. IT IS HEALTHCARE FOR WOMEN AND AN INDIVIDUAL'S RIGHT TO DECIDE, AND FLIES AGAINST U.S. MAJORITY OPINION.These laws are having a terrible effect on over half of the country. Even the Kansas state constitutional amendment FAILED. Does this state also want to sideline women's rights?? And then face severe election blowback against the GOP??Women, medical professionals, and rural health resources everywhere are suffering due to abortion bans and restrictions. People don't know how to navigate their own health, and hospital administrators are also unclear. Stop hurting your constituents.
07-08-2023
Kent and Kay Ackerson []
CON
We are opposed to this bill.
07-08-2023
Chrystal Heasley []
CON
If the GOP is for freedom then allow me and my daughters and granddaughter to make our own decisions about our health. Most women are not choosing abortion as a disrespect for life; they choose it as a respect for life. If you actually listened to physicians educated in your own state you'd learn that the human body is not perfect and occasionally things go wrong for which the physicians, not the politician, should make the call to help everyone stay safe. Statistically, more politicians go to jail for hurting people than physicians. Think about it.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Iowans deserve to have full access to reproductive healthcare.
07-08-2023
Jean Hagen []
CON
Even though Iowa Republican legislators and the Republican Governor do not support womens reproductive rights I assume they do support a strong Iowa economy. This fetal cardiac activity bill which greatly limits womens autonomy will damage the economy of Iowa and the economic status of those of us who choose to stay or are unable to leave the state. Young people and women of reproductive age, in addition to trans people and families with trans children who have already begun moving out of Iowa, will have more reasons to leave or refuse to move into Iowa, exacerbating the brain drain of Iowa. Some people will choose to boycott our state and some corporations will choose not to locate here and some organizations will decline to hold meetings or conventions here if this anti choice and anti woman bill passes. Not to mention that Republicans who vote for abortion restrictions may get voted out of office by the prochoice majority in Iowa.
Attachment
07-08-2023
Lenore Holte []
CON
Women should have the right to make their own decisions about their healthcare and reproductive futures. Most Iowans agree in reproductive freedom and strongly object to this dangerous legislation.
07-08-2023
Julie Kearney []
CON
Legal abortion saves lives. Womens reproductive rights are human rights. The people of Iowa do not want this bill.
07-08-2023
Jessica Van Dalen [N/A]
CON
Our governor was big on my body my choice when it came to wearing masks during this centuries worst pandemic and now she wants to go back on that when it comes to womens choice. No governing body should overstep the power of medical professionals nor strip bodily autonomy away. The GOP only cares about mental health when it comes to their guns, but not when it comes to forcing a person to bear an unwanted fetus. The hypocrisy is loud and childish. Its time for Iowa to actually stand up for its citizens and do what is truly best for them and stop with these ridiculous games.
07-08-2023
Tiffany Wellington []
CON
Eliminating abortion is wrong. You will not be saving lives, you will be destroying them. You will be allowing mothers to day who already have families at home. Abortion isnt just birth control as so many like to believe. It is, in fact, life saving healthcare. Stop and think why you are truly doing this and who youre really helping. And think about what the majority of Iowa citizens want. We want to make our own healthcare decisions. Kim felt we were trustworthy enough to do the right thing during Covid in regards to masks. Im not sure why women cant be trusted with our own bodies now. I firmly believe that you know this is wrong.
07-08-2023
Pauline Harrison []
CON
I support a woman's right to have control over her own body. A decision to have or to not have an abortion should not be made by the government.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I strongly oppose this bill because it would take away reproductive rights of women. When a person is making a decision about their reproductive health, it needs to be up to that individual to make that decision. I oppose the action that this bill would take in placing the state in between the trusted medical healthcare provided and the women asking for care.I am concerned that doctors will not come to Iowa or even leave Iowa if this bill is enacted.I am concerned that young women will not come to Iowa or even leave Iowa due to reproductive rights being taken away if this bill is enacted.I believe that this bill is not right for my family or for the State of Iowa. If this bill is passed I would very likely to not encourage any of my family members to move back to Iowa to establish their families.
07-08-2023
Kim Moses [None]
CON
What Iowa GOP legislators are suggesting with this bill is that women should not have the same protections under the law as men to exercise their reproductive freedom and that the right to freedom of religion (and from religion) doesn't apply to those who do not share a strict Christian viewpoint.For Iowa legislators that support what is essentially a ban on abortion, I appreciate that you have deeply held beliefs that life begins at conception and that abortion is infringing on the rights and liberties of babies. But you represent just as many Iowans with deeply held beliefs that a zygote or an embryo is not a child and that abortion is essential healthcare. We will not come to a consensus on when life begins but we can ensure that the religious views or belief systems of one group do not encroach on the individual right of others. The Iowa Legislature is looking to further limit a women's right to liberty and to live their life as they choose according to their own values (religious or otherwise) and on equal footing with men women don't need the government dictating how to live. Vote no to maintain the status quo or to put this on a ballot so Iowans, not legislators influenced by special interest groups, can decide.
07-08-2023
Michele Zuercher []
CON
I do not support this and implore those to understand what reproductive freedom means to us as citizens, not enabling lawmakers to dictate how women live with the consequences of an unintended pregnancy.
07-08-2023
Anonymous [N/a]
CON
You are endangering the lives of all Iowan women with this legislation. Not only will we not get the healthcare we rightly deserve, but you will also drive OBGYNs out of Iowa creating a womens healthcare desert. You allowed Iowans to make their own healthcare decisions during COVID do the same now.
07-08-2023
Anonymous [Citizen]
CON
60% of Iowans want abortion to remain accessible and legal. How dare the legislature favor a minority opinion over the will of the majority of the public. You are elected to represent all Iowans,not just your radical constituency.Abortion is a health care decision to be made by a woman, her family, and her doctor, not by the government. Reynolds says she supports families but rejected federal money to provide medical care to women and infants. Stop the hypocrisy. Protect women's right to bodily autonomy.
07-08-2023
Kaylah Elam []
CON
I stand with a majority of Iowans in our belief that everyone deserves the right to make their own health care decisions, especially when it comes to reproductive care and abortion. Politicians have no place interfering in someone elses decisions about when to start a family.I demand reproductive freedom for all Iowans, and ask you do the same.Iowans for Reproductive Freedom
07-08-2023
Jennifer Seydel []
CON
I am 66 years old. I have had the privilege of making the right choices for my health and wellbeing my entire adult life. I cannot imagine raising young girls in this state controlled by Christian fundamentalists, bigots, and mysongynists.When people suggest that Republicans are against big government I wonder how they don not see determining what choices I can make about my body as small government. Freedom to make any choce related to my health and wellBeing is one of the most basic of rights.Do not take away this freedom.
07-08-2023
Anonymous
CON
07-08-2023
Patricia Dolan []
CON
The right of a woman to make decisions about her own healthcare should be protected in the state of Iowa and every state in this nation. I am appalled to see that the opinions of the loud minority are given more credence and influence with Governor Reynolds and the legislature than what the women of this state want and need. It is not the job of the legislature to impose their own beliefs when governing, but to represent their constituents and make laws that treat men and women equitably. It seems that Iowa is being run by big money and those who have sold out to its influence. Start voting to protect the rights of women!
07-08-2023
Martha Viner []
CON
WHAT I OR ANY WOMAN DECIDES TO DO WITH THEIR MEDICAL CARE IS NOT ANY POLITICIAN'S BUSINESS. ROMAN CATHOLIC NOR ANY OTHER RELIGION'S MYTHOLOGY IS NOT THE BASIS OF LAWS IN THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICATHE CONSTITUTION TELLS YOU THAT! (ANY EMBRYOLOGY TEXT WILL TELL YOU THAT NO FETUS HAS A 4CHAMBERED HEART CAPABLE OF "BEATING" UNTIL 24 WEEKS OF DEVELOPMENT.)
07-08-2023
Alyson Evans Leigh []
CON
No MAN would ever allow any person or authority of any kind to control what he does with his own body. Yet MEN see it perfectly logical that the government can control the bodies of his wife, and female family members, female friends, and female neighbors and female community members.Why can't our Brothers defend their Sister's human rights? Sisters that have been Entrusted by the Wisdom of Nature and not to mention GOD, to see to it that our human species in this world will continue and thrive by creating females alone that have the ability and choice if they choose to create Human offspring naturally in their bodies. And I must mention also that this is a very important POWER that only females have been given as humans and defines females as humans very different from MEN in bodily abilities and how females relate to this world and MEN. This has ensured our survival as a species since the beginning of human history and will continue to unless we risk Tampering with Creation and risk the grave personal and societal consequences. If women think their bodies are not under their own control and ownership at all times they would see this as a threat to their families and be willing to "Fight City Hall" along with their allies so creatively and with such determination that they would win every time! YEs! YES YEEESSSSSSSS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! They would exclaim!Men have controlled females and the planet for almost all of human history. We need to make a line in the sand. We females will have control over our bodies!It may be necessary to make a leadership change on Planet Earth. We need Women Leaders! Not today's female leaders (or any of today's corrupt dishonest leaders making their personal wealth OFF OUR BACKS, literally) but Honest, Upfront in intention female leaders with highly developed HEARTS! Naturally, Babies and children would be the winners! Also families, community's and the entire planet would be happier and healthier and stronger in every way that matters!If Men had the babies in this world abortion would never ever have been banned in any form or capacity whatsoever!!!!!!! You would be considered "dangerous" for even suggesting pregnant Men have their rights restricted in any manner or be told how to deal with their "Condition". The role of Manny (Male Mom) would be the highest honor in Society and everyone that knows anything about anything would look up to them. Full Manny Government Benefits would be provided as a rule! "They (Manny's) shape our future as a nation and the whole planet by default"! Society would Praise.We must not continue to punish females with laws restricting their HUMAN RIGHTS!
07-08-2023
Anonymous [N/a]
CON
I stand with a majority of Iowans in our belief that everyone deserves the right to make their own health care decisions, especially when it comes to reproductive care and abortion. Politicians have no place interfering in someone elses decisions about when to start a family.I demand reproductive freedom for all Iowans, and ask you to do the same.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Support womens rights and human rights!!!! Spend your time on banning assault weapons
07-08-2023
Marlene Runyon []
CON
I supportive reproductive freedom for all.
07-08-2023
Jason Menke []
CON
No one in either chamber is qualified to make a decision that only a woman and her physician should make. The decision to end a pregnancy is already an extremely difficult one, and Iowa has no business inserting itself in that scenario.
07-08-2023
Becky Svatos []
CON
We should focus on reducing unwanted pregnancy and supporting babies and their parents rather than trying to eliminate a womans right to control her own body.
07-08-2023
Candace [Daniels]
CON
My body, my choice!!!
07-08-2023
Gina Bell [None]
CON
Please do not jeopardize womens health without even hearing from your constituents. Iowans do not support an abortion ban. Play with our lives now and well remember at the polls.
07-08-2023
Julie Lawrence []
CON
Women can and should make medical decisions without interference from legislators.
07-08-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Forced birth is not pro life. No one should be forced to carry a child, for any reason. This bill aims to legislate a decision that should only be made between a pregnant person and their chosen healthcare professional. This bill hurts women and hurts healthcare for women. All women should be able to access care but this bill especially hurts people whose lives may be endangered by pregnancy, whose pregnancy is the result of sexual assault, or women who are forced to carry non viable fetuses. And as weve seen in other states, it hurts whole systems of care for these womeneven the ones who choose to carry. OBGYNs and midwives cannot provide care when they may be held criminally responsible for providing appropriate medical care. In the name of life, it endangers and punishes living girls and women and all people who can carry fetuses. Reproductive rights are essential human rights. This bill takes womens autonomy over their own bodies and gives it to the government. The government cannot possibly understand or foresee every nuance, every situation, every family, and every person this bill would harm. This bill is not how you end abortion, but it will hurt Iowans and Iowas healthcare.
07-08-2023
Randall Wilson []
CON
A) Religious freedom means every person has the right to their own religious beliefs but can never misuse religion to infringe on the rights of others.B) Many Iowans of faith believe in the right to access safe and legal abortion because of their faith.C) One religious belief should never be inserted into public policy and allowed to take away anyone elses rights.D) The right to an abortion is supported by an overwhelming majority of Americans, including Iowans. 61% of Iowans including Republicans, Democrats, and Independents support access to safe and legal abortion.E) Abortion is overwhelmingly safe.F) Abortion is common. One in four women who are able to get pregnant will have an abortion at some point.G) Abortion is essential health care.H) Any ban or restriction on abortion, beyond the current Iowa law, is harmful and takes away Iowans abilities to control their body and future.I) No one else can know a persons situation their health, wellbeing, risks, and future. Abortion is a deeply personal decision. Every person deserves the right to control their reproductive health, and their future.
07-08-2023
Stephanie Bell [Humanity]
CON
Pregnant people are humans. Abortion is healthcare. Until it is safer to be pregnant than not (which it never will), we need safe, legal access to reproductive healthcare and that includes abortion services. Bills like this KILL people.
07-08-2023
Kate McElligatt []
CON
Iowans overwhelmingly support keeping abortion safe and legal. Our governor and Republicans are pandering to the extreme right and this issue. Kim Reynolds is more interested in positioning herself as DeSantis' or Trump's running mate than she is representing the views of Iowans. Abortion is a medical procedure that should be decided between a woman and her physician.
07-09-2023
Jodi Wiklund []
CON
As a woman, mother, grandmother and a pediatric RN I am completely against this bill. I could not have an abortion personally but I think women should have the right to make that decision for herself. At 6 weeks most don't even know they are pregnant and if you speak to any medical professionals they will go back to basic science and explain to you that at 6 weeks the fetus isn't even viable. But this isn't about saving life this is about forcing you beliefs on others and controlling women. If this was truly about saving children then how about free lunches, med insurance, childcare assistance, making sure no child goes hungry, actually helping struggling parents, making sure no family goes homeless, and how about stop going after LGBTQ+ kids and stop trying to force your so called "Christian" values onto others. That definitely isn't what God says to do. This bill is going to harm women and children.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This must not pass !!! Knowing how much harm its going to do to women!!!! Don't like abortion don't get one......
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Do you really want women to have to prove they were raped to be eligible for an abortion? Adding stigma to women's health care creates an undue burden on the victim.
07-09-2023
Tara McKee [N/A]
CON
Pregnancy is too complicated to legislate. Passing this ban will lead to death or serious harm of actual living pregnant children and adults. Exceptions are meaningless as they are too vague to be used in reality.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Keep the government out of the private patient care provider relationship. We already have too many strains on the physician patient relationship that is driving excellent providers out of Iowa, resulting in more harm to all Iowans not just a small number seeking care in very complex and challenging situations.
07-09-2023
Trinity Ray [Not applicable ]
CON
The question of bodily autonomy is a question of our most basic liberties and freedoms. To legislate what any person can or cannot do with their own bodies is a slide into fascism. This was settled with Roe v. Wade. Good luck taking rights away from Iowans. Careful what you wish for!
07-09-2023
Karin Ulery [N/A]
CON
Freedom of choice. Freedom to make appropriate decisions about my health care with my doctors. Those are the things that this bill is trying to take away. You are trying to take away my freedoms, my childrens freedoms, the women of Iowas freedoms. The vast majority of Iowans do not support this. But the republican party, and Kim Reynolds are not concerned about what we want. The Iowan GOP is more concerned about culture wars than they are about the desires and the rights of Iowans. This move to take away. Abortion rights is nothing more than a facist and totalitarian scheme in a larger culture war.
07-09-2023
Linda Quinn [None]
CON
I speak with the majority of Iowans and Americans who say abortion is morally acceptable and recent abortion laws are too strict. The freedom to make personal medical decisions should be equal for not only men but also for women. Of course! I also speak from the experience of having an abortion. This medical procedure allowed me to choose when to start a family, and to time that family for when I was economically, emotionally, and educationally prepared. Lets ask our leaders, Whats your motive to restrict womens rights? Is to keep us barefoot and pregnant? Andrew Koppelman, author of Forced Labor: A Thirteenth Amendment Defense of Abortion, writes forced pregnancys violation of personal liberty is obvious. Restrictions on abortion also violate the (13th) amendments guarantee of equality, because forcing women to be mothers makes them into a servant caste, a group that, by virtue of a status of birth, is held subject to a special duty to serve others and not themselves (National Review, Feb. 7). (Steve Corbin, Cedar Rapids Gazette, July 8, 2023)
07-09-2023
Shelly Silver [private citizen]
CON
If you are "prolife," I know you think you're saving unborn babies; in some cases that may be true but for the most part you aren't doing that. You're just making it harder for women and girls to get the care they need.I'm begging you to go on the internet and search abortion stories or on YouTube and listen to all of the horror stories of women that had something go wrong in their pregnancies and they couldn't get an abortion in their state. They either needed to travel to another state or carry the baby to term only to have the baby die in the womb or shortly after birth just like their doctors said.One mom said we have end of life measures for people who are injured or deathly ill. How is this any different? Imagine how heartbreaking it was for her having to carry that fetus for weeks and months instead of terminating the pregnancy so she could move on. Wouldn't that be the humane thing to do? Imagine if that were happening to a woman you know.In some cases, the woman isn't "sick enough" to get an abortion, she had to get sepsis or any other number of complications first before she could get an abortion. Even those who are "sick enough," doctors are still reluctant or out right refuse because none of them want to get sued or have their license revoked or worse be criminally charged. I sincerely hope you do not criminalize women who get abortions or their doctors or people who help women get abortions like they've done in Texas, where they have a 6 week ban. The following is copied from an article by The Hill.Amanda Zurawski, one of multiple women suing Texas for getting denied an abortion while facing pregnancy complications, offered a scorching rebuke of Sens. Ted Cruz and John Cornyn (RTexas) at a Senate hearing in April saying she nearly died on their watch.Zurawski lives in Austin, was diagnosed with an incompetent cervix, and was told her baby would not survive. The condition occurs when the cervix ruptures prematurely and is a common cause of late miscarriages. Since her baby still had a heartbeat, Zurawski was told there was no other care the hospital could provide. She eventually went septic, and the hospital finally agreed that she was ill enough to induce labor. She delivered her child, who passed away.I wasnt permitted to have an abortion and the trauma and the PTSD and the depression that I have dealt with in the eight months since this happened to me is paralyzing, Zurawski said at a Senate hearing about a ruling from a federal judge in Texas that attempted to block to sale of a popular abortion pill, mifepristone. On top of that, I am still struggling to have children.Zurawski took aim at Cruz and Cornyn, arguing the senators supported the policy that kept her from receiving an abortion.I wanted to address my senators, Cruz and Cornyn, neither of whom, regrettably, are in the room right now. I would like for them to know that what happened to me its a direct result of the policies that they support, Zurawski said. I nearly died on their watch as a result of what happened to me, I may have been robbed of the opportunity to have children in the future.Both Cruz and Cornyn sit on the Senate Judiciary Committee, which held the hearing on Wednesday morning. The senators attended the hearing but were not in the room when Zurawski addressed them. And that is just ONE story. Imagine if that were you or someone you know. This should enrage you to not let this happen here in Iowa. These are the same stories women had to tell 50 plus years ago. It's why abortion was legalized in the first place. In 2020, Iowa was ranked last for obstetric care. Rural hospitals and clinics had to close their obstetric units to keep the rest open. An outright abortion ban will drive even more providers from our state.Preach all you want about women carrying to term but YOU CAN'T MAKE A ONE SIZE FITS ALL LAW. Abortion is healthcare. Only women (and unfortunately young girls hopefully with a trusted adult) and their doctors should be making these decisions. I assure you they can be trusted to make the right decision for themselves. Please think of the women and girls in your life, don't you think they'd be capable of managing this?There actually was a 10yearold girl in Ohio that was raped by a family member that had to travel to another state to get an abortion. There have probably been others that we haven't heard about because frankly none of this is any of our business. Women and girls should not have to reveal the most personal private details of the most difficult decisions of their life. You guys are supposed to be about individual freedom. Denying abortion care is not freedom.The majority of Iowans including Republicans want abortion safe and legal. If you do this, you might finally go too far and get yourselves voted out of office.You might think that restricting abortion at 15 weeks or some other arbitrary number is a compromise. Unfortunately we know pregnancies can go wrong at anytime during the 1st and 2nd trimester; and less than 1% of abortions are happening in the 3rd trimester. For example, a woman had an abortion following a diagnosis at 29 weeks of pregnancy because her fetuss brain was not developing. Since a great deal of fetal brain development happens after the 24th week of pregnancy, there was no way to diagnose that problem earlier. I had to search that story out. Please do your diligence and research. Listen to women and their doctors!I can't believe this needs to be said but no one is getting an abortion in the third trimester the baby is healthy and babies are not being killed after birth. Donald Trump and other prolifers make these claims. If this were happening, it would be murder an we have laws about that. Please do not restrict abortion in any fashion in our state. If you want to prevent abortions, how about you make birth control free and easily accessible for all? That won't eliminate the need for abortions but at least it will cut down on unwanted pregnancies.We have homeless and food insecure kids here as well as parents who need child care. I'm not being facetious here. How about we take care of the kids we have? Thank you for reading.Sincerely,Shelly SilverPolk City Democrats
07-09-2023
Marlene Runyon []
CON
I supportive reproductive freedom for all.
07-09-2023
Trinity Ray [Not applicable ]
CON
The question of bodily autonomy is a question of our most basic liberties and freedoms. To legislate what any person can or cannot do with their own bodies is a slide into fascism. This was settled with Roe v. Wade. Good luck taking rights away from Iowans. Careful what you wish for!
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
By not listening and representing the perspective of the people in Iowa, Governor Reynolds is weakening our democracy.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [NA]
CON
No one else can know a persons situation their health, wellbeing, risks, and future. Every person deserves the right to control their reproductive health and make their own decisions about their future. Politicians should not put themselves in the middle of Iowans health care or their decisions.Never before has a governor called a special session to advance a political agenda. A ban on the rights of Iowans is all about politics.
07-09-2023
Mary Josie Margolin [823 Clark St, IC, IA 52240]
CON
This is a war on women. This is taking our rights. This is taking our freedom. This is putting women in danger. This is no longer an America I recognize.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
As a citizen of Iowa, I am against HSB 255. Banning abortion, in any way, creates extreme hardships for much of the population. There is no form of birth control that is 100% effective & an unplanned pregnancy is always possible; a majority of the people who have abortions have already given birth at least once & it is a responsible decision to get an abortion if you realize that you do not have the means to raise a child. Even if a person chooses adoption as their choice when they find out they are pregnant, they still must be pregnant for nine months; the USA has extremely high rates of maternal mortality for a developed nation, especially in regards to people of color, and being pregnant and giving birth is detrimental to a person's health many times. No one should be forced to be pregnant if they do not want to be, especially when the act of being pregnant makes them unhealthy or possibly die. It's important to realize that one in four women will have an abortion by the time they turn 45 for many diverse and important reasons. A person must be allowed to have autonomy over their body for their future; the law should not dictate what I do with my body. Abortion also has a very low rate of regret; The Turnaway Study found that 95% of women who had an abortion said they made the right decision five years after their abortion. Those women were able to get out of abusive relationships, go to school and start careers, raise the children they already had in better environments. If they were forced to give birth, their lives would be much different; The Turnaway Study showed that people who did not receive a wanted abortion suffered from higher rates of economic hardship, mental health issues, and physical health problems. No one should be denied an abortion that they have chosen because they know they can't have a child for any reason, but especially because they know they cannot support one for fiscal or mental reasons.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
Abortion should remain legal in Iowa and this bill should not move forward. It is between a woman and her doctor if she needs or chooses to have an abortion. No one else should be making that decision for her. I have three adult children and have never been in the situation where this was a decison I faced for myself, but I know others who have, women whose babies have died, women whose life was in danger. I can only imagine the trauma they have dealth with and am grateful they were able to have the medical care they needed. I am sure this is a procedure that is not taken lightly. I strongly oppose this bill. I also vote in every election and women's rights are important to me and are factored in to my decisions.
07-09-2023
Lauren Mettenburg [Private Citizen]
CON
Abortion is healthcare. Lawmakers should not be dictating what services the medical establishment can/can't provide or offer to their patients. It's none of their business. We know that abortion bans and restrictions disproportionately affect marginalized people who cannot afford to travel to another state for care. They widen already gaping health inequities for rural Iowans, people of color, those with disabilities, and people with lowincomes, and make them more likely to be forced into pregnancy. The fact that this special session has been called shows that you know that this is an unpopular decision & is selfserving. As of March 2023, 61 percent of Iowans wanted to keep abortion safe and legal in our state. So why are you pushing this? This is not representative of your constituents.We don't want abortion bans. Not now, not ever.
07-09-2023
Ann M Rhodes []
CON
I strongly oppose legislation that will restrict a womans right to elect abortion. Opposition to it is based on religious beliefs that should not be imposed on people who dont share them. It is an insult to take this very personal decision away from the women whose lives will be effected forever by it. Please do not restrict access to abortion further in Iowa.
07-09-2023
David Basener [n/a]
PRO
I would first like to say that my heart goes out to all those who have ended the life of their child before he or she had a chance to take their first breath, celebrate their first birthday, or attend their first day of school. My heart also goes to all those others who have felt the loss of these children. But today I speak for the millions of children whose silent screams have not been heard and have not been allowed a voice in their God given and Constitutional Right to Life.On June 29, 2018 the Iowa Supreme Court said that in the Iowa Constitution there was a right to murder me or anyone like me anytime in the first 9 months of my life for any reason. On that day there were no such words in the constitution and still today there are no such words in the constitution. The court overstepped its authority, amended the Iowa Constitution, and created a special right so that one group of people, women, could deny another group of people, unborn children like me, of their first right, Life. How could they do such a thing? Murder and the death penalty are illegal in Iowa. Can they discriminate against me because of my size even adults are different sizes. Or is it because of my level of development each of you continued to develop for years after you were born. Or is it because of my location is my mothers womb the only legal kill zone in Iowa where one out of every five of us die nationwide? Or is it because of my degree of dependency young children and aging seniors are dependent on others. What about you when you were in the hospital from illness or injury? Abortion is not healthcare. A procedure that results in the death of at least one person every time is not healthcare. What is abortion? Abortion is a deadly physical assault on an unborn boy or girl like me. Abortion is also a physical, psychological, emotional, and medically detrimental assault on my mother. This is the real war on women.Abortion is the most barbaric and inhumane method of execution. Slaughter houses would be shut down overnight if they killed livestock using any of the methods of abortion. After all we are still alive when all of this happens.Where is my equal protection of the laws, due process of the law, right to life, and urgency to prevent harm? If the Iowa and U.S. Supreme Courts had shown the same boldness in applying these arguments to the unborn American persons like me as they did in redefining marriage, abortion would have become illegal in America on June 26, 2015. In America, it is the Judicial Branch that we look to, to correct injustice by proper interpretation and application of the law. In this case the Iowa Supreme Court failed for us unborn with deadly consequences. I would like those in the Judiciary to tell me what crime I have committed to be given the death sentence? The State has a compelling interest in restricting abortion because of the many negative and adverse side effects of an abortion to the health and wellbeing of my mother if she should undergo such a procedure. Others involved in or affected by the decision to murder me experience many of these same negative and adverse side effects. Please make Iowa a safe place for me to live, grow, and be born.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
As an emergency medicine physician, I worry about my ability to treat women with pregnancy complications within the constraints of a law created despite scientific evidence showing its harm. Women will die preventable deaths.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Private Citizen ]
CON
There is an old saying in politics....."you come for our rights....we come for your seats." If this goes through, and women's rights are taken away....there will not only be lawsuits and injunctions filed in the courts, but many of the so called "lawmakers" including our incompetent "governor" will find themselves on the outside looking in when their respective terms come up. When People head to the ballot box....they DO remember the times when oppressive legislation was passed against the will of the People....and there has been literally ALL KINDS of oppressive legislation from banning books, to denying care for those in the LGBTQ+ Community, to taking food away from children, seniors and other vulnerable folks for starters. I really don't think you want me to list everything that was passed this recent session as this would be longer than my right arm. Abortion IS healthcare and it needs to be up to the woman, her respective partner, family, and her doctor and any appropriate medical personnel involved. Politicians do NOT belong in the respective exam rooms making decisions for others they know nothing about. In Texas, 5 women and 2 doctors filed a lawsuit against the state for SB8 and a few more women have since joined this lawsuit. I have attached this lawsuit for your reading pleasure, but I will give warning. The first third of this 92 page lawsuit profiles the 5 women and 2 physicians involved, the second third of this document profiles the Texas law itself, and the final third of this document profiles women all across the country who are NOT part of the suit itself and some of the things they went through as a result of being denied the healthcare they so desperately needed. I will warn you....some of the descriptions are so graphic....such as one woman literally bleeding into her shoes in the emergency room yet still denied care and turned out onto the street...you will lose your lunch when you read them. The lead plaintiff has already testified at the House Judiciary Committee in Washington DC in late April. This woman nearly died because she was denied care. Women should NOT have to become so sick they are near death to receive needed care, nor should they have to travel multiple states away, or beg for it. This is unacceptable, intolerable, despicable, and downright deplorable. I have included the link for your viewing pleasure. https://www.cspan.org/video/?c5068172/userclipamandazurawskitestimonyNever ceases to amaze me that we live in one of the greatest countries in the whole world, yet we have the worst maternal/fetal fatality rates and this will only get worse if this bill passes. Doctors WILL leave the state to practice elsewhere and these fatality rates will only worsen and the maternal care deserts we currently have in this state will get larger. If you don't believe that...check out the states of Idaho and Louisiana these 2 states have quite literally had labor and delivery units close down because the respective physicians packed up and left these states. I strongly oppose HSB255 everyone deserves healthcare (no matter what it is) in REAL TIME and the physicians and medical personnel should NOT have to consult with the legal department of their respective hospitals or clinics to treat patients in need. The PHYSICIANS and respective medical personnel are the ones with the training and expertise. NOT the politicians!!! We don't need any politicians trying to practice medicine without any education or training as that is illegal in the State of Iowa.
Attachment
07-09-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
I am pleading for law makers to keep abortion safe and legal in Iowa. I am in full support of everyone having their own beliefs and opinions; however, it should be the individual's right to do what they see fit with their pregnancy and their body.It is essential we keep access to healthcare related to pregnancy and maternal health legal. The number of deaths related to pregnancies has doubled in the last 20 years (per a study published in the Journal of the Americal Medical Association). The more services we take away, the more this number will continue to rise. This is absolutely not okay when we live in the United States of America. We need to support and increase our healthcare, not take away from it. I remember being so scared when I was 19 and my boyfriend said the condom had broken; however, I knew I could turn to safe places to help me make decisions on how to navigate my possible pregnancy. It was so comforting knowing that I had safe, healthy, and legal resources within my state. I felt supported. Reality is, I would have gotten an abortion regardless of if it was legal or not. Therefore, it is a matter of safety. I was already starting college and was not going to end my career before it even started with a year of college debt building up. No one would have changed my mind about that. Again, I would have had an unsafe abortion that could have resulted in ending my own life. Now, I am a successful, working Iowan and will be starting a planned family soon. I am grateful the state of Iowa has helped me have those opportunities, and it is heartbreaking to think that it could be different for young women starting their adult lives. Please keep abortion safe and legal in Iowa. Then in turn, provide education on birth control and family planning resources to teenagers. If your ultimate goal is to prevent abortions, we need to do so from a prevention standpoint early on rather than simply making them illegal.
07-09-2023
Steven Klimes []
CON
This is a violation of a women's rights. Her health is not to be legislated. It's also a violation of her HIIPA rights!!!
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
As an Iowan I urge you to keep abortion legal and support all womens rights to bodily autonomy! Decisions in healthcare should be made by the patient and their doctors alone. Hands off our bodies! Abortions are medically necessary in ectopic pregnancy, in many miscarriages, in unviable pregnancy, they are necessary for the patient in case of rape, incest, when the health of the mother is at stake. Its just not up to you. Period. You Are. Not. The. Patient. Or. The Doctor. So. Mind. Your.Own.Business.Sincerely, Kathy Alexander
07-09-2023
Shelley Wach [NA]
CON
The majority of our legislators are male. You have not nor will you ever become pregnant; whether that pregnancy is by choice or unexpected. Therefore, not being able to ever experience that situation, what and who gives you the right to tell a woman that she has to carry through with a pregnancy? And our female legislators who are trying to usurp their power over their female constituents; SHAME ON YOU! God forbid you ever be in the horrible circumstance of having to deal with an unexpected pregnancy or a fetus that will never be viable. A 6 week ban on abortion is just utterly ridiculous and inhumane. Use your legislative powers for better causes; causes that effect all of us: inflation, low wages, sky high rent and mortgages, etc etc.
07-09-2023
Laura Felleman []
CON
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Please do not limit abortion rights for women in Iowa. This decision is between a woman and her doctor. Those of you who make laws to cover all, can't possibly cover every situation. As a Christian woman who had an abortion, I experienced much guilt, however, that is also between the individual and her God. Spirit is much larger than any humanmade notion developed in a church. This is not your decision, and it will be remembered come election time.
07-09-2023
Shelley Klimes []
CON
A women's right to choose should be a given. The fact that we have to fight for this is unbelievable. What we do with our bodies is our business. This is not about babies etc this is about control and power over women. All of those who screamed and yelled about their personal rights and wouldn't wear a mask during Covid are the same ones voting and supporting this. Shame on Kim Reynolds and shame on all those who support and vote for this. May you never get elected to any office again.
07-09-2023
Michelle LeCaptain [Self]
CON
I am unable to attend because only four days' notice was given for this vote. Please seek guidance from experts and your constituents. Blanket banning abortion disproprotionately harms the marginalized, increases maternal mortality, and makes it more difficult for providers to care for patients. In my personal experience, when a man tries to rape you it's not like he uses a condom. If our representatives truly care about the marginalized they will vote no on this bill and put efforts into universal healthcare, subsidized child care, and affordable healthcare. Thank you.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Self]
CON
The right to choose an abortion should be maintained at this time. Women and families do not make these decisions lightly. They make the choice that is best for their families at the time. We have seen reduced numbers of abortions with increasing use of more effective birth control. Promoting contraception use and implementing supportive measures for families should be the first priority. We will see abortion rates continue to decline if those measures are undertaken. Abortion access and its limitations or exceptions should be a decision made within the patientphysician relationship or with patients' and physicians' expertise leading the discussion.
07-09-2023
Hope Scheffert []
CON
No bans on abortion or any womens reproductive rights can ever be implemented.
07-09-2023
Nancy K. Larsen [Planned Parenthood; Citizen]
CON
Early in my career, prior to RvW, I cared for patients who were suffering from infection as a result of receiving illegal abortions. Many were critically ill and some died a terrible death. While I would not, in most cases, choose this action for myself, I couldn't possibly make this decision for others. Attached is a search that I did a couple of years ago, just looking at studies related to pregnancy and termination of pregnancy over the years. Please do not force my fellow citizens to complete a pregnancy if they wish otherwise. If you choose to force ladies to do so, are you going to provide means to care for unwanted children? Nancy Larsen
Attachment
07-09-2023
Chelsea Goshon []
CON
I strongly oppose any bans on reproductive and abortion rights. Bodily autonomy is my right. We have more protections for the autonomy of cadavers than we do for women. Banning abortions does not reduce abortions, it only reduces safe abortions. The blood will be on your hands if this bill is passed.
07-09-2023
Carol Bodensteiner [Personal ]
CON
Women should have the right to make their own health care decisions. The decision about when and whether to start a family should be between the woman and her family and doctor not the government. A solid majority of Iowans (including Republicans) believes abortion should be available to women. Please listen to all Iowans, not just the hard right minority.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Allow exceptions for rape, incest,a endangering life of mother
07-09-2023
Lynda L Bordwell [Emma Goldman Clinic]
CON
Passing this bill will negatively affect Iowa women and their families. Prohibiting abortion after detection of a fetal heartbeat would occur before many women know they are pregnant. A fetal heartbeat is detected around 6 weeks of gestation. Current medical testing for compatibility with life can not be done at 6 weeks of gestation, so this exception has no real affect for the women and families involved.I do not support any bans on abortion. Please vote NO on this billThank You,Lynda Bordwell
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Fairlie]
CON
My aunt nearly died following an illegal abortion during World War II. Making it less accessible threatens womens autonomy and lives.
07-09-2023
Michael Schmidt []
CON
This extreme bill is NOT what most people in Iowa want. Even disregarding public sentiment, it is NOT your right to intrude on a woman's right to choose.
07-09-2023
Linda McGuire [none]
CON
this bill will cost women's lives. stay out of health care decisions that are between pregnant people and their doctors.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Dear Legislators,SECTION 1 of Iowas Constitution states All men and women are, by nature, free and equal, and have certain inalienable rights among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty, acquiring, possessing and protecting property, and pursuing and obtaining safety and happiness. This was updated as recently as 1998.The proposed legislation, HSB255, appears to place an undue burden on women and their families who wish to end a pregnancy and will likely embroil the state government in continuing lawsuits which happened following similar 2018 legislation. Rather than helping women prevent unwanted pregnancies, providing resources to women during difficult pregnancies, or assisting families with childcare, state government appears to be opting for political battles as we head into next years elections. Creating new and swift state expectations for identifying perpetrators of rape and incest may have unexpected consequences in the legal justice system, especially with the clock of the pregnancy ticking.Personally, I am familiar with stories of many women who experienced unwanted and difficult pregnancies. Placing the state in the middle of the conversations between patients and health care professionals appears to me to be on overreach from our state leaders. I believe Section 1 of Iowas constitution which was recently updated to support the equality of men and women, is an important guide in approaching this issue. I urge state leaders to vote no on HSB255. Sincerely,Brett CloydIowa City
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Private citizen]
CON
I am so against this bill. That the governor is spending extra tax payer money to hold this special session is appalling. This is not a present use of time or money. At one time, Republicans stood for fiscal responsibility and individual rights. This session action and this HB 255 counters that.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Iowans for Listen to Your Constituents ]
CON
Abortion is healthcare. Listen to Iowans and let us vote on this. Stop making legislation that the majority of us do not want.
07-09-2023
Deb B Darling []
CON
I am adamantly against any bans on abortion rights for women in our state. I'm one of over 60% of Iowans who believe a woman has a right to choose her own reproductive rights, not our state government. Mark my words, there will be blood on your hands if you vote for this ban on abortion, because it won't stop abortion, it will only stop legal and safe abortion.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The government should not interfere in people's reproductive health care decisions. No person should be forced to carry and bear a pregnancy against their will. This proposed ban is inhumane and intolerable. You are strangling human rights and making the state of Iowa a very undesirable place to live.
07-09-2023
Shannon Stack [None]
CON
Youre wasting tax payer money on this appalling attempt to gut womens healthcare in Iowa, knowing full well over 60% of Iowans DO NOT AGREE with your zealous 6 week abortion ban. Shame on you Governor Reynolds.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The government should not interfere in people's reproductive health care decisions. No person should be forced to carry and bear a pregnancy against their will. This proposed ban is inhumane and intolerable. You are strangling human rights and making the state of Iowa a very undesirable place to live.
07-09-2023
Lesley Frank []
CON
Protect our reproductive freedom! No to the ban!
07-09-2023
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
As the father of two daughters, Im concerned about this ban and how it will put the decision to carry a pregnancy in the hands of the state. I cant think of one medical decision that the state restricts me the way you want to restrict them.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
As a Roman Catholic, I was raised to believe that abortion is wrong. I sympathize with people who believe this and who believe outlawing abortion would save lives. However, strong evidence demonstrates that outlawing abortion does not save lives. Outlawing abortion puts pregnant women as risk if they need a medical intervention. Outlawing abortion makes government the arbiter of a personal medical decisions. Outlawing abortion means women will die. One key issue is whether legal abortions will be performed safely in a clinic by a medical doctor, or will be performed illegally in a hidden place by people who are not medical doctors. Legal abortion means that the procedure is safe. To encourage women not to have abortions, the state must: provide sex education to boys and girls; make effective contraception widely available; offer medical, social, and financial support to pregnant women and mothers. Support Iowa women by keeping abortion legal.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
WOMEN DESERVE HEALTHCARE AND THE SOLE RIGHTS TO THEIR OWN BODY
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This type of legislation will harm women's health and invade the privacy of women and their families. It is a clear overreach of government. I urge all elected officials to vote NO on any further restrictions of abortion. Abortion care needs to remain safe and legal.
07-09-2023
Jesse Singerman []
CON
I am writing to protest the proposed legislation that will severely restrict abortion rights in Iowa. Abortion is health care. Restricting abortion access affects all reproductive health care for women and results in overwhelmingly negative outcomes in maternal health, including an increase in maternal mortality and pregnancyrelated medical emergencies.Women find themselves pregnant for many reasons, and some of those reasons are out of their control. We must have the right to control our fertility and make reproductive decisions that are right for us as individuals and our families. This legislation is misguided and represents religious repression of the worst sort. If the supporters of the legislation dont believe in abortion, dont have one.
07-09-2023
Stephanie Trannel []
CON
HSB 255 is poor policy for the state of Iowa and dangerously limits the healthcare rights of girls and women. The bill will disproportionately impact poor families and women and girls in minority communities. The bill does nothing to help Iowans and everything to hurt them. These lawmakers should be focused on providing more affordable and accessible healthcare options for Iowa families and not fewer. This bill will also make our state less attractive for business, industry, healthcare providers, educators, travelers etc. As legislators you should be doing all you can to support Iowans and make Iowa more desirable, not playing to a small group of christian nationalists who are completely out of touch with Iowans. If this bill passes, Iowans will suffer.
07-09-2023
Kathryn Sogard [N/A]
CON
I am writing as an Iowan of childbearing capability and age. Laws such as HSB 255 put limits on the freedom, health, and future, for child bearing persons like me. Abortions are health care and allow women to make decisions about their family, personal health, and their future. You dont have to believe me about the limitations and consequences that laws such as HSB 255 force upon young people. But I hope you have taken the time to listen to women from around the country who have experienced devastating consequences such as fertility impacts, mental health impacts, and physical health consequences because their state took actions to restrict their freedom to make their own health care decisions. Everyone should have the right and freedom to make their own health care choices. I urge you to support freedom by voting no on HSB 255.
07-09-2023
Lyn countryman [Individual]
CON
I am writing as an older female who has lived all her life in Iowa. Although I am past childbirth age, I like many other females have had a spontaneous abortion, more commonly known as miscarriage. Although this is something unavoidable, Laws such as HSB 255 put limits on the freedom, health, and future and are written to restrict womens feminine healthcare. This affects half the population. I also had a friend who was raped. Should she have kept that baby born of violence? Think carefully now in this session what you choose to do. Taking womens healthcare decisions away, puts them back in the dark ages. How would men feel if their health care was curtailed? Testicular issues. Sorry you cant do anything as that would prevent you from having more children.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am an Iowa Independent voter and I live in Bettendorf. I am writing to urge you to vote against Governor Reynolds proposed sixweek, fetal heartbeat ban on abortion in Iowa.First. This is calling a special session. Which means taxpayer money is being needlessly spent to pay for your attendance. Why cant it wait until youre back in session in January? Whats the rush? Just giving less than a weeks notice of the session looks like Governor Reynolds is trying to quash any opposition or chance to organize opposition. To me, it looks like shes just trying to push it through, hoping no one will notice in July, when youre not in regular session. Its legal, but not really moral or ethical, let alone, again, a waste of taxpayer money.Second. Currently, abortion is legal in Iowa until the 20th week of pregnancy. That is acceptable. Six weeks is not. Many women (myself included) do not even know they are pregnant at six weeks. Quoting a recent article in the Quad City Times, However, some major medical organizations, like the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, note that what is detected at six weeks is not a heartbeat, but instead electrical impulses, and that an actual heartbeat does not occur until roughly 1720 weeks of pregnancy. Follow the science, not misguided passions.Third. Also quoting the Quad City Times, According to a 2023 Iowa Poll, more than three out of every five Iowans say abortion should be legal in all or most cases. You are elected to follow the will of the people, not misguided passions.Fourth. Governor Reynolds seems to think that because both houses are overwhelmingly Republican, that there is a mandate for the sixweek ban. Thats really a disservice to all Iowa voters, assuming we vote on just one policy or position. Just because both Houses are controlled by the Republican party, does not mean that all Republican (and Democrat and Independent) voters support her proposed ban. When I vote for a candidate, I look at the whole person, not just one stance. And Ive never totally agreed with any candidate on all their positions. She is just playing politics, trying to outdo Florida. Yes, I have heard Iowa referred to as Florida North. Thats not a compliment. Her assumption is really a slap in the face to Iowa voters.Fifth. Vouchers for education (which will now cost millions of dollars more) were pushed through, along the lines of parental rights/choice. Yet, this proposed sixweek ban will deny my parental rights/choice as to when I want to become or continue to parent. That is very hypocritical. Abortion is a decision between a woman and her doctor, not a state legislator. If you are against abortion, fine. Dont have an abortion. But dont legislate that I cant. Lastly. If you really want to know how Iowans feel, put it up to a vote. In November, not a midsummer (lets sneak it through) vote. Kansas did, Iowa can. Unless, of course, Governor Reynolds wouldnt like this as she may discover how Iowans are really against this. Sincerely Susan Berger, Iowa Independent Voter ProChoice, not Forced Birther
07-09-2023
Carol Swanson [individual]
CON
Whether to terminate a pregnancy is a personal decision for a woman and her family; not a decision to be made by elected officials and political allies. The choice stands with women, not you.
07-09-2023
Stephanie Warywoda [Human being ]
CON
Iowa should keep abortion legal! Kim Reynolds, and her crew cherry pick laws that their constituents dont agree with, and this one is a prime example. The government should stay out of my medical decisions with my doctor. You have no business there and should stop wasting my tax paying money to litigate against things that I dont want and many people in this state dont. You claim you were for personal freedoms yet you stick your nose into places if they dont agree with you. Continuing to bring bills to the floor that are unconstitutional and nobody realistically wants is a waste of everybodys time and money. Women should have autonomy to their bodies and not have to worry about Kim Reynolds.. keep abortion legal in Iowa
07-09-2023
Kara Schneider []
CON
I am strongly against this bill, as are a majority of Iowans. Listen to the constituents that elected you all. This bill must not pass. We need to attract MORE OB/GYN healthcare professionals to our state. This bill will do the opposite and negatively affect the women in our state.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Body autonomy is a thing. You cannot force someone to make you donate any organ to another person. If a fetus is defined as a person, and the person carrying that fetus does not want to continue donating their body to the growing of that fetus, it is devaluing that individual to someone less than autonomous personhood. I am against this measure.
07-09-2023
HEATHER WESENBERG []
CON
Stop trying to restrict womens reproductive health in Iowa.
07-09-2023
Tarrill Abney []
CON
Iowa needs to support health care for all Iowans.
07-09-2023
Lauren Eastburn []
CON
I support reproductive freedom.
07-09-2023
Virginia Meyer []
CON
Taking away reproductive rights means our government does not believe women are fully adult citizens with autonomy. It says women are not allowed to make their own healthcare decisions and not allowed to determine their own plans for the future. It is unthinkable to place women in a position of a child that cannot make personal decisions and have full control of her destiny. If you think it is just that a women may be forced to bear a child against her will, you need to rethink the meaning of liberty and freedom.Do not pass this bill. It is an assault on women and human rights.
07-09-2023
Deon Schmidt []
CON
As someone who made the decision to have an abortion at age 19 when I found myself pregnant as a sophomore in college, despite being on birth control pills, I can tell you it was the best decision I ever made in my life and I have absolutely no regrets. To take away a pregnant persons right to choose what is best for them, and their own lives is repulsive. Feel free to never choose abortion for yourself or for whom evers uterus you feel you control, but you do not get to make that decision for me or anyone else. Restricting womens reproductive rights is just another thing driving youth out of the state, and making it very on welcoming. That includes my 20something son and daughter, who will leave the state as soon as they finish their education.
07-09-2023
Victoria Aden []
CON
Please vote against this bill which further restricts access to abortion healthcare in the state of Iowa. I understand that some of you may have beliefs on when life begins that differ from mine, and I respect the sincerity of your beliefs. I would ask that you also recognize that Iowans may have different beliefs than you on this question of when life begins. Please consider this and trust Iowans to make this personal decision on their healthcare themselves, without government involvement. If your goal is to reduce abortion, please look to pass legislation that will provide education and free contraceptive care to prevent unwanted pregnancies. Increase access to contraception and OB/GYN services in the state. Provide free prenatal care to those that are pregnant, and require at least 12 weeks of parental leave following the birth or adoption of a child. Improve access to child care and provide universal preK for Iowa's children. These actions will do much more to support women and children and families in this state.Again, I ask you to support the majority of Iowans who believe this decision is best left to women and their healthcare providers, and do not support this bill that further restricts access to abortion healthcare in this state.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am against this proposed bill. Government has no place interfering with a womans health privacy. It is between her doctor and her. It is not our place as a society to dictate what we think is best and interfere with a womans civil rights. At 6 weeks a woman may not even be aware she is pregnant and government is choosing to dictate her health? I strongly oppose this and the majority of Iowans oppose this draconian interference.
07-09-2023
Rachel Bruns [N/A]
CON
Abortion restrictions will further exacerbate the existing shortage of OBGYNs in Iowa and worsen maternal health outcomes. Vote no to restricting abortion. Restricting abortion is a human rights violation.
07-09-2023
Kathryn Ahn [self]
CON
I am firmly against this bill. Women have the right to make private medical decisions for themselves. This is not prolife, this is probirth. Banning abortion will create many dangerous, lifethreatening situations for women.
07-09-2023
Jodi Woodrich-Bunn []
CON
This is a decision for the woman and her medical teamnot legislators. What a sad time for iowajust another example of poor representation after a barrage of overreach from the previous session. Shameful.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I oppose an attack on reproductive health care here in Iowa. Medical decisions are to be left between a patient and their doctor, as females are not a commodity. A Des Moines Register poll from July 2022 shared that 60% of Iowans believe abortion should remain legal. I am one of those residents that request you keep the right here in Iowa. Iowa has already made it so that abortions are not performed after 20 weeks and a 24 hour waiting period is enforceable. Let us not force out our women and medical providers to live and work in other states!
07-09-2023
Jennifer Aiello []
CON
Please do not go forward with this bill. Abortion is healthcare. There are times it is medically needed. If this bill passes, are you prepared for the results? Medical expenses for mothers and babies with catastrophic medical issues? Supporting children medical care, food security, education? Supporting women medical care, maternity leave, living wages, affordable housing?Those with the financial ability will leave the state to go to another state to get an abortion. Women without means will be forced to have children that they may not be able to support We already have a high number of children in foster care. If we want to be pro life, we need the infrastructure in place to support it. We are not there as a state. Please do not pursue this bill. The majority of the people do not want this. Please represent the majority.
07-09-2023
Tony McDowell [Citizen of Iowa]
CON
I am vehemently opposed to this bill and all others like it. This is purely a moral belief being imposed on the citizens of Iowa by a minority of others. This bill is also written to placate certain others in an attempt to make it more palatable to another group the legislators are hoping to garner support from.If these legislators and our poor Governor were truly antiabortion there would be no exceptions to this bill. No rape exemption, no incest exemption, no exemption period. Instead what the legislators seek is instead control over other peoples choices and that is all. Our US Supreme Court has already chosen to disregard one of its most important tenets by striking down Row v Wade. No only did they strike it down the newest Justices bold faced lied to Americans in order to get the opportunity to disregard that tenet. Now our Governor and her lackey legislators are attempting to ram a piece of legislation into place by directly hiding this session from the majority of Iowans who are not even aware they can do this shady legal practice.This bill is strictly a bill to place control over individuals, especially women. It is not about life because if it was they would be working to make adoption easier, they would be working to help families care for these children they are so concerned should be born.The GOP and the governor do not care about the children. They care about control. If care was the goal they would be making raising children easier and more affordable. Instead these politicians would rather children be born to parents who dont want them regardless of the potential abuse or neglect these children they purport to care for will endure.This bill is is purely about control and not children no matter what these politicians say.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
This law is a step back in time and will lead to a decline in maternal health. Do better, Iowa.
07-09-2023
Matthew Brown [None]
CON
Dear Legislators, Please reject the neartotal abortion ban being proposed. Laws like this show the government invading our private lives, making decisions for us. They endanger the health of mothers. They do nothing for the children of these unwanted pregnancies. They will adversely affect the poor and the underresourced. They will bring children into the world with no safety net. Please do a gutcheck and say honestly whether you would require your daughter to go through with an unwanted pregnancy, from rape, from incest, from a slipup (given the fact of human imperfection), or from an individual decision (given the fact of human autonomy in a freedomgranting democracy). Extend the mercy you would show her to others who are not your kin but are your fellow citizens. Why do they deserve less than your daughter? Thank you for your consideration.
07-09-2023
Jordan Bruns []
CON
I do not support this legislation. Restricting options for healthcare is not right and will negatively impact Iowans.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
07-09-2023
Marian Baggenstoss []
CON
Forcing others to create more people only creates more problems. If someone thins its wrong to give birth they should not be forced. Preventing people from accessing healthcare is barbaric and forcing people to create another human is inhumane.
07-09-2023
Sheri Deal-Tyne []
CON
This bill is not representative of the majority of Iowans. Every Iowan deserves the fundamental right to make individual decisions about their reproductive health care, including birth control, abortion, and pregnancy.
07-09-2023
Marygrace Elson, MD [Self, retired physician]
CON
Dr. Marygrace Elson, retired physician, speaking for myself, no conflicts. I actively oppose this bill. The provisions of this bill will cripple and has great potential to criminalize physicians caring for women with pregnancy complications. We have already seen the consequences of such legislation in other states where women have not received medically appropriate care for pregnancy complications until they have had life threatening hemorrhage or infection, because physicians or hospitals feared legal consequences. A woman should not need to be near death in order to receive appropriate care when that neardeath scenario could be prevented. Pregnancy complications are nuanced and complex and the practice of medicine is best left in the hands of physicians. The State does not belong in the exam room dictating medical care. Thank you.
07-09-2023
Colleen Dencklau []
CON
There is no right to intercede in reproductive decisions. That is above and beyond State and Federal Regulations. Reproductive rights are individual rights and must not enter into the public/religious venue. Separation of Church and State mandates this.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Not affiliated ]
CON
This bill is offensive to the decision already made by the State Supreme Court and to the will of the Iowa voters.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Self]
CON
Yall, stop trying to ruin peoples lives. Can you fix the air quality instead?
07-09-2023
Meghan McCray []
CON
This bill being passed would be in complete opposition to what the majority of Iowans want and believe, as shown (again) most recently in a Des Moines Register article published March 27, 2023, and quoted below:A majority of Iowans believe abortion should be legal in most or all cases, according to a new Des Moines Register/Mediacom Iowa Poll. Sixtyone percent of Iowa adults say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while 35% say the procedure should be illegal in most or all cases. More than twothirds of Iowa women, 70%, say abortion should be legal in most or all cases. Democrats also are broadly in favor, with 87% favoring legal abortion. Likewise, 72% of Iowans under age 35 and 70% of city dwellers also say abortion should be legal in all or most cases. The poll of 805 Iowa adults was conducted March 58 by Selzer & Co. of Des Moines. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points. The findings mirror an October Iowa Poll that showed a matching 61% of Iowans said abortion should be legal in most or all cases and 33% said it should be illegal in most or all cases. The Iowa Poll has measured Iowans views of abortion seven times since 2008. The percentage of Iowans supporting legal abortion has risen or remained the same in all but one poll, in March 2020, climbing from a low of 48% in September 2008 to its peak in October and now.STOP going against the will of the people. You will be held accountable!
07-09-2023
Emily Walton [Iowan]
CON
Please keep Iowans safe. This is healthcare. Medical choices should be discussed between individuals and their providers not their politicians.
07-09-2023
Marian [Sensor]
CON
Stop this bill!
07-09-2023
Thomas Moberg []
CON
This proposal is a tragedy for human rights and religious freedoms. There is no argument for limiting abortion that is not rooted in a conservative Christian worldview, and to codify that worldview into law is a form of theocratic fascism. This decision will not eliminate abortion, it will only subject pregnant people to the violence of the state, leaving those who cannot afford the short term cost of traveling out of state with two choices: face a lifetime of poverty from an unplanned pregnancy, or risk their lives by trying to end the pregnancy themselves. The legislators who vote for this bill will be directly responsible for the impoverishment and death of those people. The movement to end abortion is not about safeguarding children, and it never has been; it is a bad faith moral panic that conservatives manufactured in order to take political power by exploiting the evangelical christian voting block. The people bringing this bill forward are the same people who signed Iowas first child labor law into effect earlier this year. Theyre the same people who fought against the child tax credit, who do not believe in universal preK, universal healthcare, or adequately financing public education, and who will not even ATTEMPT to address school shootings. They will not address the insane wealth gap and the oppressive labor tactics that siphon money from working class families and feed it to the rich. They will not address the planetary crisis of climate change, which raises ethical questions about bringing a new life into a world that is destined for ruin. We must reject the conservative framing of abortion, and instead force this question: What have these legislators actually done to create a world worth raising a child in?Vote them out.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Good afternoon. I oppose HSB 255, a bill that further restricts access to abortion for women in Iowa.I am a Christian woman who believes that religious freedom means every person has the right to their own religious beliefs but can never misuse religion to infringe on the rights of others. I also believe that one religious belief should not be inserted into public policy and allowed to take away anyone elses rights. I am an independent voter who believes that women have the right to access safe and legal abortions based on their own belief system and conversations and input from their significant other, family members, and their health care team. Any ban or restriction on abortion is harmful and takes away a womans right to control her body and her future.I am the mother of two one by adoption and one by birth. While I do not think I would have chosen abortion as an option to an unplanned pregnancy, I cannot with certainty say that would have been my decision. No one else can know a persons situation their health, wellbeing, family support, financial means. Abortion is a deeply personal decision. Even if I would not choose it for myself, I oppose making that decision for someone else through legislation.An overwhelming majority of Americans support the right to an abortion. In Iowa, 61% support access to safe and legal abortion. I believe that level of support for access to abortion is significant and must influence the decisions of legislators like yourself who were elected by the people to represent all the voices, not just the voices demanding to end abortions.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Its absolutely heartbreaking to me to see that the GOP, which i used to support, would once again bring forth this measure. You want individuals and families to be fiscally responsible, yet keep voting to take away women's rights on when to choose to have children, and when to choose with their doctors what the most appropriate care is. Having been very responsible yet gotten pregnant on 3 types of birth control, with only one live birth, I can testify that not having the ability to have an abortion would have drastically changed my life, and possibly ended it. You have no right to make those decisions for me, or any other girl or women in similar circumstances. Shame on you for attempting to take away womens rights and quite literally our lives.
07-09-2023
Leah Lind []
CON
You cannot force women to give birth to a child, this is beyond the right of the state. Most women do not even recognize that they are pregnant before a fetal heartbeat is present. Stop trying to control the reproductive rights of women!
07-09-2023
Barbara Persoon []
CON
Stop listening to the national Republican party and listen to your state's constituents. Over 60% of Iowans support legal abortion. If you don't want one, don't get one. But don't interfere with other people's lives and values. Most of our legislature and certainly our governor are not trained in the medical field, so nose out of something you know too little of. A little knowledge is a dangerous thing; especially when you use it to order other people's lives.Your church's values and rules are not the same as mine. If I believed in your church's viewpoint, I would attend it instead of my church. Don't think that you know the only one true way to God because you don't. Jeremiah 23:16.And stop wasting our tax money on a tantrum caused because you didn't get what you wanted. Go home before you cost us more and mess things up even worse.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Listen to the people of Iowa. The majority does not agree with this. Please pay attention to your constituents.
07-09-2023
Chloie A Smith []
CON
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Woman should not have to fight for the freedom over their own bodies. You have no right to decided what is right for someone else. In addition, restricting abortion will put many women at risk for health complications and even their own life. If you are pro life, then help the poor and help with common sense gun control.
07-09-2023
Carol Chesterman [NA]
CON
61% of Iowans believe that every Iowan has the fundamental right to make individual decisions about their reproductive health care, including birth control, abortion, and pregnancy. I urge you to support legislation that supports Iowa women's right to be in control their bodies and not give that authority to legislators. I urge you to NOT support a 6week ban on abortion. Vote NO!Respectfully, Carol Chesterman
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Myself]
CON
This issue is not black and white. You must take into consideration situations where abortion is an absolute medical necessity to save the life of a mother in cases where the child will be born with no quality of life. You are hurting the living mothers of Iowa if you look at this as a black and white issue.
07-09-2023
Thomas R. O'Donnell []
CON
Abortion is a divisive issue and people of good conscience can disagree on it. I don't believe, however, that eliminating longstanding rights serves Iowans. The Iowa Supreme Court had it right in 2018 when it said women's abilities to control when and how many children they have are essential to their liberty and equality. Without that right, they will be forced to carry a child they did not plan for and did not want. No one should be compelled to give birth. It's a drastic violation of individual rights.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Abortion is a basic healthcare need and a decision between a woman, her family and physician. As a party of less government you are making healthcare decisions for all women in Iowa and we will not forget get this in future elections.
07-09-2023
ERIN ELGIN [Iowa Resident]
CON
The majority of Iowans are in favor of choice for women. I am in that majority.I suppose it is hard for some legislators to understand that choosing an abortion is one of the hardest medical decisions in a woman's life. No one's first choice is to have an abortion. Research supports this claim.People of privilegeand the governor and many of her supporters are in that categoryseem to have no qualms about taking away freedoms from others because they have so many options themselves. If female, a ban wouldn't impact them if they are a) wealthy enough to afford one if the need arises; or b) beyond their childbearing years. If male and religious, they may see it as "their duty" to save the children. Regardless, it is not their choice to make. None of the legislators would want to have anything forced on them. People like to choose.This proposed ban takes away freedom of choice and puts legislators in control of women's bodies which, frankly, is unfair and unacceptable.Do NOT vote in favor of this ban.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
We support abortion rights for all human !
07-09-2023
Tracy Heskett Lepeltak []
CON
What is being proposed is way too restrictive for a woman to be able to have control of her own body. To me, this is a classic example of government interference in the personal life of the residents of the state. This is a very personal and private matter for a woman, not for our governor or legislators. Please reconsider what the majority of the people in our state believe, not the group of legislators, who are trying to push their belief system onto a state of over 3 million people.
07-09-2023
Mandi King []
CON
Abortion is healthcare. That Iowas GOP is attempting to limit an individuals access to what that individual and their healthcare provider deem appropriate for themselves in regard to their health goes against the freedom this state and country claim to believe in. To add to this, there must be a clear line between state and church when it comes to lawmaking. This attempt to push a groups beliefs onto the constituents of this state that are clearly, and in majority, not supportive of such a law is antidemocratic.Please vote no to limiting all access to this vital healthcare.
07-09-2023
Sam Moon [Individual]
CON
Abortion is a bodily autonomy right to anyone that may need it. Abortion is not killing babies and robbing them of their lives. No access to safe abortions is going to kill more healthy people than any amount of children you think are being taken away from a happy life. If you care so much about the children then fund foster care programs more. Make the children who were actually cast to the side by their parents, be it of their own choice or not having an option but to rely on the foster care system, actually feel like you care about them first before forcing them to live a life they didnt ask for. No access to safe abortions means people sexually abused by the people around them will be forced to give birth to a reminder that they were assaulted. This includes teens. Forcing adults and teenagers (CHILDREN) to give birth to an unwanted child will only cause grief and misfortune to the parents and the child themselves. Unless the state is going to fully fund the life of this child they mandated to live, then they should have no say on what people should be allowed to do with their bodies. Women and people with a uterus are infantilized and demeaned when they want control over their own bodies, be it an abortion or a hysterectomy or more. Theyre required to wait way longer than they should for permission from SOMEONE ELSE to do what they want with their own bodies. People know what is best for themselves medically. They LIVE in their own bodies. It should not be up to any senator or representative whether someone has a right to do what they want with their body medically. If you care abour the children so much. Stop funding antiabortion bills. Fund schools. Fund libraries. Fund foster care facilities. Increase gun protection laws so our children feel safe in school, a place that is supposed to be comfortable and meant for learning and gathering. Increase penalties for pedophiles and those who break their probation to harm children even more. What someone does to their body in the privacy of a doctors office is none of your business. Nobody is forcing anyone to get abortions they dont want. All you have to do, is mind your goddamn business. Thank you for reading.
07-09-2023
Andrew Wolos [n/a]
CON
What will happen if a woman is raped and does not realize she is pregnant until after a fetal heartbeat is detected? She will be forced to carry her rapist's baby? Furthermore, will you be working to mandate paid maternity leave for women that will be forced to carry babies to term? Will you also be supporting zero deductible/premium healthcare for these women when they have to visit the doctor and hospital during these pregnancies? My guess is you will not. Because for Republicans, pushing this agenda, which has been shown to be widely unsupported by Americans, is not about protecting life or being prolife. It's about forcing birth. Because once that baby is born, you don't support any government assistance to help that mother and child succeed. Take note of what happened across the country in November 2022 when antiabortion politicians took this stance.
07-09-2023
Jill Meadows []
CON
I'm a board certified OBGYN and have had the privilege of helping approximately 30,000 individuals with an abortion as their providing physician throughout my medical career. Most of my patients have been Iowans. Each patient is unique with their own hopes, dreams, challenges, and personal situation. This government mandate would discount all of our complicated humanity and represent a near total ban on abortion in Iowa. It will take away our ability to make private decisions that affect our families, health, and bodies on a fundamental level. Abortion is common, moral, and an important part of the essential healthcare that Iowans deserve.A six week ban is particularly arbitrary and cruel. Countless patients I've served have been blindsided by their pregnancy, often causing a diagnosis past six weeks gestation:the adolescent, athlete, or PCOS patient with absent or irregular menses; the patient with a highly reliable form of contraception such as DMPA a progestin IUD, or implant that may cause amenorrhea or unpredictable bleeding but also has a small failure rate; the patient on cyclic hormonal contraception (pill, patch, ring) that has a misleading withdrawal bleed despite a contraceptive failure; the patient on continuous hormonal contraception (pill, patch, ring) to suppress bleeding and hormonal fluctuations to treat endometriosis, chronic pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, heavy bleeding, menstrual migraines, PMDD, recurrent benign ovarian, or recurrent benign breast cysts, but has a contraceptive failure; the patient who had a tubal ligation that fails; the patient with a partner who had a vasectomy that fails; the patients that had laparoscopies for ovarian cysts &/or endometriosis whose doctors told them there was too much scar tissue to ever conceive; the patient who had an endometrial ablation procedure (destruction of the uterine lining) to treat abnormal uterine bleeding, causing cessation of menses, who was told erroneously that she could never get pregnant but not only did become pregnant but now has a high risk pregnancy with higher risk of hemorrhage; the infertility patients who utilized assisted reproduction, only to find out years after they'd completed their families that they could indeed conceive; the patients who recently gave birth, are breast feeding their infants, and haven't resumed regular menses yet, and another pregnancy is the furthest thing from their minds and the last thing they need while already caring for a baby. I have seen many patients in all of these situations.In addition, although many people may find out they're pregnant relatively early, they may not have the resources to pursue pregnancy termination right away; they waste precious time visiting a crisis pregnancy center only to find out they don't offer abortion care, or the nonmedical staff provided them with misinformation about how far along they are; they need time to consider their options; their life situation changes suddenly; they have to make childcare &/or travel arrangements. At six weeks of pregnancy, there is neither a fetus or a true heartbeat, so the bill as written is intentionally dishonest. Helping people in need and being an abortion provider has been my Divine calling. The Bible is not antiabortion. However, shaming and dehumanizing women is antiChristian in my opinion. My patients have exhibited a deep Knowing of what is right for them and their families, including their current &/or future children. I respect individuals' freedom to make their own healthcare decisions. I call on the Iowa legislature not to throw stones and endanger Iowans' lives by passing this abortion ban bill.
07-09-2023
Linda H []
CON
Women deserve the right to control over their own body. This is a decision for a woman and her doctor. Government has no place in this private choice.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The decision about a pregnancy should only be made by the woman in consultation with her doctor and family. While legal abortions never took away a woman's choice to carry her fetus to term, antiabortionists do want take away all others' choice. Everyone has a right to their personal beliefs, but not the right to impose them on everyone else!
07-09-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
Governor Reynolds & LegislatureJust because there is a Republican Governor with Republican led Legislature, does NOT mean Iowans support the ban. As a lifelong Republican, I am absolutely NOT in support of such ban. Similarly, where there actually WERE polls, Iowans were NOT in favor of school vouchers, but you went ahead and ramrodded it anyway just because it was easy with having all controls. Listen to your constituents. Overwhelmingly, people did not want the school vouchers nor do they want this ban. Listen to the people. Dont just vote by party lines. Be a bigger person.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
My body is my own and choices made for my body are my choices only. By passing this bill, you are randomly deciding because of your personal views, that a woman should be forced to carry a pregnancy to term. If it was a man being forced to do this then it would have never even made it into a random discussion. Men need to stop trying to rule a womens body and let her make her own choices about it. And just because some republican somewhere decided they were against abortion then all the other republicans have to fall in line. What if it was your daughter or grand daughter who will be forced to carry a pregnancy to term because of this law. Does it matter to you? So some dont even allow an abortion for rape or incest. So not only has a man decided what a woman can do to her body, they also decided to rape and molest her, make her pregnant then not allow the lasting reminder of the horrible abuse to be taken care of. Its just sickening and Im over it. They are sealing their fate for the next elections because their robot/copy and paste bill passing is pathetic. Why dont they try passing bills to help people rather then restrict and take away basic rights to everyone buy straight white, middle aged men. Ive never been more embarrassed and mad to live in Iowa then this past year.
07-09-2023
Stevie [Planned Parenthood ]
CON
This change could cost many women their lives, due to a need for an abortion because of complications. It would also greatly impact the families of those who cannot afford the costs associated with having a child, or even being pregnant. This change directly impacts women and afab citizens. Not everyone who becomes pregnant willingly had intercourse, because of things like rape and assault. I believe forcing a woman to carry a baby she knows she cant protect and properly care for is wrong. That just sets the baby up for failure. Because foster care systems arent as pretty as them may seem.
07-09-2023
Sam Lindquist []
CON
Having a child when you can't afford or care for one, or even just bearing a child when you don't want one, can be very traumatizing. Abortion is how we save those unfortunate souls from being put into a world with a parent who can't support them, or even themselves. In most cases a pregnancy isn't reliably detectable within 6 weeks, which would make abortion inaccessable no matter the circumstance within that time limit. Please, let people have control over their own bodies.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
Keep abortion safe and legal in Iowa.
07-09-2023
Robin Otto [Individual Resident]
CON
I absolutely do not agree with restricting access to abortions. You would be taking away women's choices. Maybe we should focus on making sure Dad's dont have a choice of whether to support their children or not. Strange how that doesnt come up when discussing whether to limit the Mom's choices.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am VERY OPPOSED to banning abortions.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [NA ]
CON
Please leave the law as it stands at 20 weeks. The legislature has.no business legislating womens bodies. Any decision about their healthcare should be between their medical provider and others she chooses to involve. The laws being enacted to protect the unborn are not truly prolife. If this were the case the legislators should increase access to healthcare and health education to ensure either pregnancy prevention or a healthy birth, add more funding for early childhood education and childcare, enact stricter laws for men who abandon an unborn child and better support programs to alleviate food and housing insecurities. The unborn deserve a more welcoming society if youre going to force women into childbirth. Mother of 16 year old twin boys and grateful recipient of family planning education and accessible and affordable birth control from planned parenthood while in college and grad school from 19931998 when it had sufficient funding.
07-09-2023
Laura Dickinson []
CON
Please vote No to this bill. 60% or more Iowans do not want reproductive rights to be changed as they stand now in Iowa. My body, My choice! There is no room in my doctor's office for the government!
07-09-2023
JIll E. Kromminga []
CON
Just want you to know I am anther, life long Iowan who sees this bill as a Very Bad idea.
07-09-2023
Karen Kubby []
CON
We just celebrated the 4th of July. A day of celebration of democracy, self governance, and individual rights. Please live out these values as you vote "no" on any abortion care restrictions.Allow people to make their own decisions. No forced parenthood, no forced adoptions, no forced abortions. Trust us to do what is right for ourselves and our families.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Citizen of Iowa]
CON
I realize you don't care what I, or the majority of Iowans for that matter, think. If you did, you would not consider passing this legislation. I also realize you don't care how intentionally dishonest the naming of this bill is a cardiac pulse is not a heartbeat. But do you realize that young people will leave Iowa in droves due to this, and other equally radical, actions you have taken this year? My oldest already has, and the other two will leave as well, I will make sure they have the opportunity and support they need to do so. And I will leave as well. Forcing poor women to go through pregnancy and childbirth against their will seems an odd obsession to me, especially among people who care so little for those children once they are born.
07-09-2023
Leah Lind []
CON
You cannot force women to give birth to a child, this is beyond the right of the state. Most women do not even recognize that they are pregnant before a fetal heartbeat is present. Stop trying to control the reproductive rights of women!
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Self/parent]
CON
PLEASE vote no on this women hating bill. This is only pure hatred toward women, thinking they are not allowed to make medical decisions for themselves. It is time to keep your religious beliefs out of my healthcare. Iowa Supreme Court has spoken! Medical abortion is healthcare. We have seen when other states have regulated womens healthcare, there is a negative consequence. Doctors leave the state, students dont want to go to college in that state, population will decrease. No one wants authoritarian rule, except authoritarians.
07-09-2023
Taylor Casey []
CON
Abortions are healthcare. Those who are not medical professionals should not be imposing laws that restrict healthcare access. Additionally, unless the state is willing to expand Medicaid access and social support, they shouldnt be restricting access to abortion. If you really want to prevent abortions, invest more in public education.
07-09-2023
Laura Routh []
CON
Abortion is reproductive health care. Reproductive health care is necessary, to ensure women are safe and healthy. The Government /Iowa legislature has no business regulating a womens body, nor preventing her access to health care. I am opposed to this legislation and deeply regret the actions of our governor in regard to this issue. Women will suffer and die if you vote to approve this measure.
07-09-2023
Michelle Platt [Individual]
CON
An individual should be able to determine next steps related to their own personal reproductive state.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [N/a]
CON
I support womens right to safe, legal abortions and to make decisions about their bodies with their doctor, not their legislator or governor.
07-09-2023
Joan Crowe []
CON
The decision to start a family should not be made by a governing body but by the people who unite to bring sperm and ovum together in hopes of having a child.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
As a married, childless adult female I believe it's important to have the right to choose what is best for your body in any situation. Why do you get to tell us what we can and can not do, this doesn't affect your life but does affect thousands of women in Iowa, you don't know who were are, why do you care one bit what we choose or how we choose? Keep abortion legal in Iowa to protect our women!! Have you ever witnessed a young mother carrying a child with a birth defect that would never survive outside of the womb and carrying said child would be detrimental to the health of your tax paying Iowan? Why would you ever pass such a bill?!
07-09-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
Allow women the freedom to make their own choice about their reproductive rights! The government doesnt need to regulate this issue!!
07-09-2023
Michael McKenzie []
CON
This bill doesn't not support the wants of the majority of Iowans. This bill does not support "life" it supports control over women who should have the right to safe and legal care regardless of their beliefs. No one is forced to have an abortion and no one should have the option taken away.
07-09-2023
Emily Breslin []
CON
As someone who could die from a pregnancy due to health risks I do believe that EVERY woman should not only have the right to choose and access to medical services. The individual choice when it comes to ones own body should be given equally to each and every individual. Healthcare and healthcare services should not be governed by the state or federal government.
07-09-2023
Shari Hawk [Planned Parenthood]
CON
There is little more vital to human dignity than autonomy over one's own body.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Iowa should not change anything with regard to abortion. There should certainly not be some restrictive "heartbeat" ban because we can see how destructive these bans are to women and girls in other states. It's cruel and blatantly antiwomen. Iowa is better than this.
07-09-2023
Cindy O'Connell [N/A]
CON
The majority of Iowans and Americans support reproductive freedom. The GOP is a reactionary, religious group of misogynists who are trying to control women once again.This backroom, meanspirited political maneuvering will not be tolerated.
07-09-2023
Katie Dalluge [ ]
PRO
As the saying goes, my right to swing my fist ends where your nose begins. In this case, my right to bodily autonomy ends where my child's body begins. I have had the honor of carrying two precious lives in my womb and experiencing the miracle of childbirth. I understand the sacrifices required of mothers, but no hardship we could ever experience in pregnancy, childbirth, or beyond gives us any right to take the lives of our children. THIS IS NOT ABOUT WOMEN'S RIGHTS. It has NEVER been about women's rights. The prolife movement doesn't care what women do with their bodies. We only care what they do with their children's bodies; namely, that women do not kill their children before they're born. I do think the exceptions are overly broad. Too often, doctors diagnose preborn children with abnormalities that aren't there. An imperfection of the body, whether accurately diagnosed or not, should not be a valid reason to kill a child. I also think we should be careful not to allow children to be condemned to death because the circumstances of their conception are not ideal. A "perfect", "wanted" child does not have more value than his "abnormal", "unwanted" peer!
07-09-2023
Alicia Claypool [Retired]
CON
Abortion is such a personal decision, one driven by faith, economics, maturity and readiness to be a parent, among other issues. I'm not trying to impose my religious beliefs on others and I don't believe abortion ban supporters have the right to impose their religious or personal beliefs on me. If you don't believe in abortion, then don't have one! Or don't allow your daughter to have one if she's raped. I wish the cabal running the Iowa Legislature and Gov's office were as committed to supporting women and families after a birth as they are to forcing Iowan's to give birth against their best interests. This is terrible step backwards to take away women's and trans Iowan's reproductive autonomy and reduce us to second class citizenship. Should this bill become law, I hope I live long enough to see my reproductive freedom restored, as well as that of my daughters, daughterinlaw, granddaughters, and all women and trans Iowans.
07-09-2023
gail kenkel []
CON
The majority of Iowans want women to decide what to do with their bodies. Leave reproductive decisions to women and their doctors. Don't cram legislation down our throats that we have already told you we don't want.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This bill increases the risk to the lives of the women and girls in this state, and will make it more difficult to attract talented medical professionals to move or stay in this state. It does no good and I don't believe for one second it was ever intended to. It's a bill about cruelty, just like most of the legislation that gets passed in this state anymore.
07-09-2023
Suzanne Shuman []
CON
Please do not restrict women getting abortions / it is a womans choice to make decisions regarding her body / many medical reasons as to why a woman may need an abortion ! Do not restrict doctors in helping a woman make good choices for her body !
07-09-2023
Lou Ann Milks []
CON
Im so disappointed in our governor. The Supreme Court handed down a decision. I believe a woman has a right to decide whats in her best interest.
07-09-2023
Michael Long []
CON
I am very much against banning abortions in Iowa. Women are smart enough to make their own health care decisions.
07-09-2023
Rev. Christopher Harrison [St. Paul Lutheran Church - Alta]
PRO
Those arguing that bodily autonomy and/or reasonable access to healthcare are the issues of primary concern in this bill are naive at best and intentionally deceitful at worst. Their consciences are either ignorant or seared, but there is no third option. Their consistent refusal to even acknowledge that abortion violently and unnecessarily snuffs out a human life is telling.While it might be granted that bodily autonomy and access to healthcare are legitimate concerns, they are, at the detection of a fetal heartbeat, secondary concerns at best.The State has been instituted to punish the wicked and protect the innocent. Society, individuals, and families thrive when it does that job well and with courage and integrity. Simply put, the State has not been instituted to enshrine bodily autonomy or personal freedoms of so called adults atop the corpses of unborn children.
07-09-2023
Jackie Riccio []
CON
Our bodies, Our choice! Reproductive Rights are Human Rights! Bans off OUR Bodies!
07-09-2023
Julie Neff []
CON
Whether Iowa Republicans like it or not, women have full bodily autonomy just as men do. Women are fully capable of making their own reproductive health care decisions, including abortion care, without government interference or regulations. To pass legislation forcing women to give birth against their will is authoritarian, misogynistic, and the complete opposite of the personal freedom Governor Reynolds claims Iowa protects. I strongly oppose this legislation and urge all Republican elected officials to show their respect for women and girls by voting no.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Citizen ]
CON
I am part of the 61% of Iowans that opposes restrictions on abortion before viability. All growing up, I was told a family member died in childbirth in the early 70s, and her husband eventually remarried and moved on with his life. When I was living with my aunt for summer job in college, she told me the real story. This family member had died from complications of a perforated uterus after an illegal abortion her abusive husband had insisted she receive. She had gone to her bishop (the leader of a congregation of members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Letterday Saints) for help several times. He wouldnt help her, even when she was asking for what to do about the abortion her husband wanted to have. The bishop apparently stopped the conversation, told her to go home and do whatever her husband said, so she did. If safe and legal abortion had been available, maybe she could have eventually left him. I will keep fighting for safe and legal abortions in honor of her, and all my friends who have needed one at any point.
07-09-2023
Anna Behrens [None]
CON
Iowa legislators should not pass HSB 255. HSB 255 violates the bodily autonomy of women & people with uteruses and endangers their physical and mental wellbeing. To require individuals to report cases of rape and incest, (within a specific timeframe), to be able to obtain an exception is demeaning, insensitive, and harmful. Victims of rape and incest should not be required to go through the process of reporting to law enforcement or health agencies to obtain necessary healthcare. The process of reporting these experiences can often be harmful and traumatizing to victims, who deserve access to healthcare and abortion without being required to face revictimization. Additionally, women should be able to choose for themselves whether they want to continue a pregnancy that poses a "serious risk of substantial and irreversible impairment of a major bodily function." That decision should be completely decided by the women whose future health is threatened, as advised by their healthcare providers and loved ones, rather than decided by strangers who do not know them or have any reason to be entitled to make any other decision regarding their health, future, or life. As a lifelong Iowan who wishes to remain in Iowa as long as it is a safe and free place to live, I urge lawmakers to defend individual rights. To maintain the liberties and rights that Iowans prize, which include bodily autonomy and reproductive freedom, Iowa legislators should not pass HSB 255.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
First off this bill is unconstitutional and grossly wrong. The "fetal heartbeat" isn't even a real heartbeat. Second, the reaction to this bill if passed is going to drain our state. The young professionals getting graduate degrees at the wonderful universities that Iowa has to offer are not going to want to settle down and start families here. Even folks who are intentionally trying to have children are at risk when doctors have to worry about whether their reasonable medical judgment of incompatibility with life is going be reasonable enough to judges and legislators. This means that women and the fetuses they want to keep will die. Young people will not stay and invest in this state. Young professionals moving away is going to trickle down to immense struggles for everyone economically. No one to be hired, no one to start new businesses, no new young doctors. Even if you don't care about a woman's right to choose, you should care about the future of our state.
07-09-2023
Cynthia Tofflemire []
CON
This bill does not represent Iowans' interests and is not a law we want passed. Iowans are against this bill. It is important to allow the Iowa population to have legal access to early abortion, and appropriate health care. My parents in NW Iowa do not support this bill. My sisters and their husbands in NW Iowa do not support this bill. My daughter in Des Moines does not support this bill. I do not know anyone who supports this bill. Iowans do not want this bill passed.Please do not be swayed by Gov. Reynolds' threats. Iowans have the final say.
07-09-2023
Laura Routh []
CON
Abortion is reproductive health care. Reproductive health care is necessary, to ensure women are safe and healthy. The Government /Iowa legislature has no business regulating a womens body, nor preventing her access to health care. I am opposed to this legislation and deeply regret the actions of our governor in regard to this issue. Women will suffer and die if you vote to approve this measure.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Self]
CON
Sponsors of this proposal purport to also want less govermental interference in their lives, but fail to keep woemens' health decisions free from legislative interference. It is incongruous to support 'right to life's and fail to pass legislation to control a ban on automatic weapons. Nuts can claim to have the right to purchase guns, but a woman can't make a decision over her own body? There are some decisions best left to one's own conscience and God alone to punish if it is wrong. We do not need the Iowa legislature (mostly men) to criminalize a woman and compel her to give birth against her will and possibly detrimental to her health. Bible thumping 'Christians' should not have the right to enforce their morality on others who do not believe life begins at conception. It is cruel and unusual punishment to inflict any legislated penalties on a pregnant woman, her doctor, and others assisting her. Who will cast the first stone? Some in the family leader and other conservative groups would dictate the death penalty for abortion. This is an abomination and completely anthesis to love and forgiveness in my opinion.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Do not ban abortion. The majority of Iowans dont want this to happen. Women should make decisions about their own bodies. With this kind of ban, we will have difficulty recruiting students and businesses . People are already leaving the state with the discriminatory laws that were passed this year.
07-09-2023
Amy Cohen [Planned Parenthood of IA Advocates ]
CON
Further restricting womens rights to choice limits out fundamental rights of autonomy. It is my body and no one, especially a politician should dictate what women do with our bodies. This legislation is setting the country back to a dangerous time in history, one that endanger our lives. As over half your constituents are women, you must consider our safety and rights. If the situation were reversed, men would never accept anyone telling them what to do with their bodies. We should not be treated any differently. You must vote against this bill.
07-09-2023
Michelle Servadio Elias [Military Veterans Caucus IDP ]
CON
The 9th Amendment of our Federal Constitution gives us every right unenumerated. Unwritten but implied. Right to privacy. Right to birth control. Right for a woman to plan her family. Arrival 6, laws uniform, the state cannot claim a vested interest when the state has no plans to provide for the unborn, support, housing, nutrition, education or healthcare or college education, or the life Liberty or equality for the unborn. There is no plan for clean water, air, or sustainable living past 2030 for the born children. An undue burden is placed on Mothers who give birth. Laws uniform would direct equality under the law, so DNA paternity tests must be law and Fathers must equally financially support every child they create. If they do not the Courts must order Vasectomies for men who do not support their children. Healthcare is a human right. I have Ehlers Danlos In 2019 during a legislative forum I started bleeding heavily and afterwards ended up in ER. My uterus was size of 4 months pregnant. My tubes are tied. Ive had 5 babies and lost 2. My fiance has vasectomy. My hemoglobin dropped to 8 and I needed emergency care. My blood pressure dropped to 70/43. Every one was grabbing at me and I had a severe ptsd military sexual assault flashback. I needed an Emergency D/C and the ICU. I got lucky. I got instant emergency care and my life was saved. I have a condition that can cause instant bleeding. I had to have a hysterectomy 17 days after my husband and I were married. Think of this same situation in todays light. It is my nature inalienable right to seek medical treatment to sustain my life so I may pursue my happiness. I could have died. Please keep the law out of Reproductive medicine. Respectfully,State Chairwoman Veterans Caucus Iowa Democratic PartyFounder Climate Environmental Caucus Iowa Democratic PartyFounder Iowa Hemp Industries Association
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Forced birth is antiAmerican.
07-09-2023
Sandee Lyons []
CON
I adamantly oppose this impingement on reproductive health rights! I seem to remember this same governor stated she trusted Iowans to make their own decision about their health. How then does she push for such regressive and repressive laws. Whether to carry and birth a child should not be decided by the government! Such a decision should be thoughtfully considered by the person who will have the responsibility to care for and nurture the child. Considerations for the health of the mother must surely be at play and that decision cannot be made before most even know they are pregnant. The current laws on the book are more than sufficient. No person who is unable to have children has any place deciding those who can must have a child. The 14th Amendment states: "No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States." Each and every one of us has the privilege of deciding how we will care for our bodies. We each have the right to "life and liberty," which no state can deprive.
07-09-2023
Robin Bressler []
CON
Till men can get pregnant and be forced to give up all of their hopes and dreams and made to give birth to a child that they will hate for the rest of their lives nothing male should ever have a chance to make this kind of decision. EVER!
07-09-2023
Collette [Saylor ]
CON
You have been elected to represent the views and beliefs of the majority of your constituents. Listen to what we are telling you: Stop taking rights away from women. We are not second class citizens in need of your interference in decisions about our own bodies.
07-09-2023
Karah Spahn [None]
CON
Please keep this matter between women and their health providers. Ending a pregnancy is extremely personal and should not be the business of our legislators. Bringing a medically fragile child into the world or one who will only live a short time is very complicated. While every life is precious, children born with severe physical defects require vast amounts of resources and money that many families don't have. No family wants to end a pregnancy for such a reason but to have no choice in the matter is dehumanizing. If our government prohibits the termination of such pregnancies, then our government should be prepared to pay for all of the extra services for these children after they are born. This would be a much more prolife stance.
07-09-2023
Kathryn Fey []
CON
My body, my decision, not the governments.
07-09-2023
Diana Fern [Blessings in Birth]
CON
Womens bodily autonomy and choice is not for a state legislature to determine.Women need to have all available health care options!
07-09-2023
Hannah Wolos []
CON
Every person deserves the right to bodily autonomy. These are decisions that should be made with medical professionals, not politicians.
07-09-2023
Kelly Work [Human being, female.]
CON
Women are NOT the PROPERTY of the state. The decision to carry a pregnancy to term is between the patient and her doctor. Its no one elses business. Youre not here to mandate vasectomies for men, only to force women to give birth. You dont take into account that birth control fails, that circumstances change, that carrying a pregnancy to term CAN cause EMOTIONAL DAMAGE. Im sure no one wants to use abortion as a birth control method, but if they did, its STILL NONE OF YOUR BUSINESS! Women are not your property. You are politicians, not doctors. You have ZERO interest once the fetus is born. You cut healthcare, SNAP benefits, youre not interested in providing housing, childcare or PUBLIC EDUCATION. Politicians are not doctors and should NOT be passing laws dictating what is actually A PERSONAL MEDICAL DECISION. You dont care how a pregnancy may have an emotional, socioeconomic, impact or harm to the pregnant woman, you only care about a fetal heartbeat! Im pretty sure that NONE of you have read The TURNAWAY Study. I have, and I have been pregnant, twice, given birth, twice. Those were MY CHOICES. I would NEVER IN MY LIFE think that ANYONE would be considering FORCING A WOMAN TO GIVE BIRTH AGAINST HER WILL. Thats disgusting! To think that elected officials think that THEY should determine that a WOMAN should not have the ability to decide FOR HERSELF, its astounding! TRUST WOMEN! TRUST THE WOMEN! We wouldnt be having this conversation if we were talking about mandating vasectomies for men convicted of domestic violence, rape, or any other crime. This is NOT about protecting the unborn, this is about CONTROL. People drive drunk, we dont concern ourselves about the potential harm to the unborn then. WOMEN have heartbeats, embryos dont have brains, lungs, and cannot survive outside of the uterus. There is no legitimate argument in forcing a woman to give birth against her will. WOMEN ARE NOT PROPERTY.An unintended pregnancy can be life altering. WOMEN MUST BE TRUSTED, WE ARE NOT PROPERTY.TRUST WOMEN, WE VOTE.
07-09-2023
Carol dePprosse [None]
CON
Governor Reynolds and others who support this bill are ignorant of the facts, have a fetus fetish and fail to see (or maybe they do see it), the cruelty they do on many fronts, including abortion. Shame, shame, shame on all of you.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Stay the hell out of women's personal healthcare decisions.
07-09-2023
Julie A Lasche Brown [Citizen]
CON
As a woman I believe body autonomy is my right. Legislating the body of a woman is dangerous, unwelcome in Iowa and an aggressive power trip for the governor. The only way to detect the activity you call "fetal heartbeat" is through the invasive process, the transvaginal ultrasound. Women in Iowa do not need to be sexually assaulted to satisfy your obsession to control us. Women's rights are human rights!
07-09-2023
Frank Simon [None]
CON
The special session is based on a theocratic view of governance and is authoritarian. Respect others opinions and gain respect for your work. Keep the state secular, nondenominational. . .
07-09-2023
Suzanne Shuman []
CON
Please do not restrict women getting abortions / it is a womans choice to make decisions regarding her body / many medical reasons as to why a woman may need an abortion ! Do not restrict doctors in helping a woman make good choices for her body !
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Midwife]
CON
Medical care should not be legislated. Do not ban abortion. Doing so will kill women and their blood should be on the hands of those that vote for abortion bans.
07-09-2023
Jennifer Brennan []
CON
This bill threatens the health of women in Iowa. This bill threatens religious freedoms. Kim Reynolds is weaponizing govt to further her personal career goals at the expense of her constituents.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This bill takes away religious freedom of those that dont believe life begins until a breath is taken, and especially those of us who believe the well being of a living, breathing, autonomous mother takes precedent over a nonviable fetus. Allow religious freedoms by protecting the mother not a fetus that cannot survive outside a uterus
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I understand Governor Reynolds is bringing the legislature back in to enact a six week abortion ban. I know there is a strong tendency for the Republican legislature to align with the Governors wishes. However you were not elected to act upon the Governors wishes. You were elected to represent your constituents and to uphold the rights of Iowans, so I am going to offer you the perspective of one of your constituents:A six week abortion ban interferes with the rights of Iowa women to make choices about their own health. Whether you and I like it or not isnt relevant abortion is health care, and its not okay to interfere with peoples health care. Health decisions are made by patients and their doctors.Besides unnecessarily inserting the government into womens health care choices, a six week ban also places women at risk. There are many situations (physicians will tell you this) when issues with a pregnancy place the woman at risk of death. Ectopic pregnancies, pregnancies where the fetus has died and is literally decomposing in the uterus, and other cases where the fetus is not viable are among the circumstances where a doctor and woman need to be able to terminate the pregnancy to save the life of the mother and these circumstances most often are not identified until long after the six week period.I was raised Catholic. In some pregnancy situations I know exactly what I would do. Since ectopic pregnancies are never viable and can be fatal to the woman, I would definitely terminate. If I were carrying a baby after the first trimester whod have a brief life after delivery, Id carry to term. However if the fetus had died or was missing elements essential to life, Id have long talks with the medical professionals, my family, and Godand then Id decide. The point is I and other women need to be able to have those talks and make those choices. A six week ban essentially eliminates the time needed to do any of that, and presupposes that there is always one best choice for any and all situations and that choice must be to carry to term 100% of the time. It is in effect a declaration that anything gray shall be deemed by law to be either black or white.So please listen to doctors and to your constituents. There are many times when I think its okay for government to intervene for the good of individuals and society but this is not one of them. People have the right to be 100% against abortion and if thats the case, they should never have one, regardless of time frames or circumstances. But people also have the right to decide for themselves.If there really must be a law about all this (not sure why, as we dont have many laws about when a person and a doc can choose other medical procedures) then I would say draw the line at three months, with medical exceptions after three months for non viable fetuses and/or to protect the life of the mother.Please dont vote for this ban. Its seems to me to be politically motivated rather than motivated by any real need to support care for women.If you read all this, thank you!
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This is just an abomination! Government has NO right to dictate anything having to do with my body.
07-09-2023
Becky Willems [Myself]
CON
I am opposed to state or any government restrictions regarding abortion rights for women. I am ashamed of what Kim Reynolds and other MAGA leaning republicans are doing to our great state in regards to this issue and many other issues. I used to believe in the Republican Party and even voted straight tickets but I can not get behind any of this b******* they are jamming down our throats. Women should not be treated as second class citizens and deserve to have autonomy over their bodies and health care decisions. Start listening to your constituents and quit worrying about whether a lying, cheating, racist, egomaniacal, criminal, disgraced former President is paying attention to them. Please do the right thing and listen to the majority of Iowans who believe this issue is between a woman, her loved ones, and her physician.
07-09-2023
Deb Scott-Miller []
CON
Access to abortion is health care for women. By denying our ability to make our own choices for our own health care, you are denying us our human rights. Health care is a decision made between an individual and their doctor.
07-09-2023
Danielle Woodford []
CON
Abortion is a human right. Banning abortions is just taking away access to SAFE abortions. Abortions will still be done but not safely because womens right have been taken away. Banning abortions is fucked up. The government should not be able to FORCE women to have babies. Id rather have my uterus removed if thats the case.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Do NOT pass more restrictive laws regarding abortion! Not all Iowans support these restrictions on reproductive. It should be a choice, made by a woman and her doctor. Keep your bans off my body!
07-09-2023
Abigail Scheppmann []
CON
Youre evil, evil people for doing this. You wont care, but this will hurt so many people.
07-09-2023
Toni Morrison [N/A]
CON
Here is the beauty in prochoice, it gives FEMALES (want to make this BOLD because we all know if we we're talking about men and snipping their swimmers when it comes to reproduction this would be a different discussion) the right to make their own decisions. The right to keep or terminate their pregnancies that was decided amongst themselves and their personal doctor. Government should not have the higher say between a patient and the doctor. The church/bible should not have a higher say between a patient and their doctor.The overturning of Roe v Wade and the federal protection it provided should have never happened. Now that it has, each woman's decision should be made on an individual by individual basis, and not infringed on a red state by red state basis.Keep the government and the church/Bible out of my utuerus!
07-09-2023
Jennifer Horak-Hult []
CON
Abortion rights are inseparably connected to racial, economic, gender, and immigrant justice. Safe and legal abortion is central to bodily autonomy and the right to make decisions about our bodies and our futures. The majority of Iowans agree and want to see abortion remain legal in our state. As an Iowan who has experienced the loss of a pregnancy, I know how deeply personal abortion healthcare can be. Please do not strip Iowans of our right to control our own bodies.
07-09-2023
Barbara Yankey [Select...Interfaith Alliance ]
CON
Rather than happy news of the fetal age, the ultrasound revealed a fetus with numerous abnormalities. University of Iowa Genetic Counselors determined the fetus would not survive to birth. Their recommendation was to terminate the pregnancy. This intimate personal situation and decision to terminate a pregnancy is between the mother, her support system and her physician. This woman was my daughter. Given this situation, why should she endure the emotional distress of wondering "is this the day" her fetus will not be viable. Why should her family and the citizens of Iowa endure the financial and insurance expenses for prenatal care until "that day"? After personally experiencing this situation, I fervently want to protect a woman's dignity and right to selfdetermination regarding abortion and her health care.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
There is no place for the state in the bedrooms of the nationThis quote was from 1967, made by Canadian Prime Minister Pierre Elliott Trudeau, father of current PM Justin Trudeau. Back in 1967, Trudeau said he was bringing the laws of the land up to contemporary society. Why, more than 50 years later, is our governor pulling us into the past? I wish I could speak, but my schedule simply doesnt allow for it. So allow me to say that I never has to worry about abortion laws; I was a nurse, and educated in both health care and personal reproductive care. I had access to physicians and made certain that I was never in danger of an unwanted pregnancy. I was fortunate, but I know there are so many women not in the same predicament as myself. These are the women who require access to health care providers so that they can guide their own lives. The State our government should not take that away from them. Whatever your values may be, it is not your job to apply them to others. I can respect your values. Your job is to respect everyone elses. Abortion is a medical issue, and should be a decision only made by physicians and their patients.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
This should continue to decision between a provider and patient.
07-09-2023
Stevie [Planned Parenthood ]
CON
This change could cost many women their lives, due to a need for an abortion because of complications. It would also greatly impact the families of those who cannot afford the costs associated with having a child, or even being pregnant. This change directly impacts women and afab citizens. Not everyone who becomes pregnant willingly had intercourse, because of things like rape and assault. I believe forcing a woman to carry a baby she knows she cant protect and properly care for is wrong. That just sets the baby up for failure. Because foster care systems arent as pretty as them may seem.
07-09-2023
Jo Ann McNiel []
CON
I sent this individually to all GOP legislators As you enter the special legislative session on Tuesday, please consider, as reported in the Des Moines Register on March 27 Sixtyone percent of Iowa adults say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while only 35% say the procedure should be illegal in most or all cases. More than twothirds of Iowa women, 70%, say abortion should be legal in most or all cases. Democrats also are broadly in favor, with 87% favoring legal abortion. Likewise, 72% of Iowans under age 35 and 70% of city dwellers also say abortion should be legal in all or most cases. Additionally, The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists note that an actual heartbeat does not occur until 1720 weeks of pregnancy (Gazette, 7/6/23). Please do NOT further restrict safe and legal abortion access in Iowa. The rights of a fetus should not supersede the rights of the mother, whose life you know NOTHING about. Please focus legislative time and resources on the health and safety of the alreadyborn, and their assurance of societal support and protections. Jo Ann McNiel3224 Timber Valley Ct. NECedar Rapids, IA. 52402
07-09-2023
Gretchen Eastman [Individual voter]
CON
Abortion is a part of women's reproductive health care and should remain legal. The decision should be among a doctor, patient, and patient's family should the patient choose to include them in her reproductive health decisions. The state already has time limits on when an abortion can occur. Further restrictions are not necessary.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [concerned constituent ]
CON
Abortion bans and restrictions disproportionately affect marginalized people who cannot afford to travel to another state for care. They widen already gaping health inequities for people of color, (especially in Iowa) people with disabilities, people in rural areas, young people, and people with lowincomes, and make them more likely to be forced into pregnancy. Abortion bans are dangerous and harmful. Iowans deserve to have access to safe and legal abortion. I urge all legislators to reject this bill.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This bill is anything but pro life. It will lead to higher maternal mortality rates & keep women trapped in abusive situations.
07-09-2023
Elizabeth Lundberg []
CON
I am extremely opposed to any restrictions on abortion care. The ability to end a pregnancy is essential to our health, freedom, and economic security. A third of all women end a pregnancy at some point in their lives, and this statistic cuts across all political and religious affiliations. Every voter affected by this issue will remember your actions and statements on this bill.
07-09-2023
Ann Hart []
CON
Leave the current law alone. Let women control their own bodies. This is not the role of government.
07-09-2023
Anonymous
CON
I want all woman to have the right to choose what they want their life to be. All decisions regarding womens health are between her and her doctor. Stay out of our uteruses. Stop playing political games with peoples lives. Legislate for better healthcare, better childcare, quit stealing money from our public schools. The GOP is driving young people out of Iowa. Stop taking our rights away and pretending you are ProLife when you dont give a s*** about any of us. We dont believe the lies.
07-09-2023
Denise White-Staecker []
CON
How is spending taxpayer money to bring everyone in for a special session more important than spending more tax payer money to fund education and our area education agencies? Both involve the precious lives of our children. Education is important. This state deserves better.
07-09-2023
Jane Keahna [Planned Parenthood Association oh Iowa]
CON
As a retired RN, I cannot fathom safe abortion being unavailable to every woman who wants or needs one. Prior to Roe vs Wade, when I was in the Navy, I was mortified and my heart hurt from the number of women who had to seek out butchers to take lots of their money for a procedure they knew nothing about.didn't know what they were doing. Those women died from bleeding to death.
07-09-2023
Samantha Israel []
CON
Keep big government out of our doctors offices and keep abortion care safe and legal. Hyperpartisan politicians with personal religious beliefs and zero medical background with little to no knowledge of reproductive health have no place in another individuals decision making process. Ever. Period.
07-09-2023
Jane Kennedy []
CON
The most effective way to reduce the number of abortions in Iowa is to make birth control more affordable and easily available. Unwanted pregnancies are the problem, and preventing them is the best direction for our efforts in Iowa. Restricting abortions will not stop abortions. Desperate women who are not ready financially or able to raise a child or raise another child will find a way to end their pregnancies. The means to do so can be extreme and even lifethreatening. Providing safe abortions is part of providing safe health care for women in our state. If you want to reduce abortions then put more effort and funds into researching and providing more effective birth control. Every woman I know who had an abortion was using birth control when she got pregnant. That is the problem we need to solve.
07-09-2023
Jennifer Rud []
CON
Stop taking rights away from women. If it's not your body you don't get to decide what happens to it. You don't support abortion, fine. Don't have one. It's that simple. You don't get to decide for anyone else.
07-09-2023
Meagan Schnoor [Private citizen]
CON
Abortion is health care and should not be restricted. Pregnant people have the right to make decisions about his or her own body. Restricting abortion does not make abortion go away. It makes abortion less safe. Restricting abortion hurts low income people the hardest because rich people will always be able to access abortion. I had to have three abortions for three very wanted pregnancies that I miscarried. If I had not had those abortions, I could have lost my life due to sepsis or other such conditions. Then my husband would be a widow and my other children would have lost their mother. Do not pass legislation that bans abortion in the state of Iowa.
07-09-2023
Ellen McDonald []
CON
Women should be in charge of their own bodies when it comes to healthcare. Abortion is healthcare. It's a necessary procedure. Look at the other states with abortion bans. They have put women's lives at risk. Why would the governor and the GOP in the state of Iowa want to implement a law NOW to repeat the same horror stories here?
07-09-2023
Kevin J Kasel []
CON
I am against this bill. A woman should have her own right to do with her body as she freely choose. I, as a man, have no right to control a woman's right to her health/body/wellbeng. Neither should government. A woman should feel free to make the best possible choice for her health & body.Her body. Her decision.
07-09-2023
Jazmin Ramos [Concerned constituent ]
PRO
Abortion bans and restrictions disproportionately affect marginalized people who cannot afford to travel to another state for care. They widen already gaping health inequities for people of color, (especially in Iowa) people with disabilities, people in rural areas, young people, and people with lowincomes, and make them more likely to be forced into pregnancy. Abortion bans are dangerous and harmful. Iowans deserve to have access to safe and legal abortion. I urge all legislators to reject this bill.
07-09-2023
Morgan Stone []
CON
This bill effectively puts myself and my daughter in imminent danger. Its a threat on our lives and will increase maternal death rates.
07-09-2023
Tim Nelson []
CON
The right to bodily autonomy should not be infringed by the state.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This bill is inhumane and you should just stop worrying about controlling womens bodies.
07-09-2023
Carol Steffensmeier []
CON
I am a lifelong Iowan. I was once proud of Iowa. I am completely AGAINST ANY LAWS that take away a womans healthcare rights, including abortion at any time. IT IS NOT YOUR RIGHT TO DECIDE SOMEONE ELSES health care. VOYE NO!!
07-09-2023
Liz Kressig []
CON
The Governor and the Republican majority are overstepping, by trying to control a womans right to make her own health care decisions. Any health care decisions made by women should only be made between her, her family, and her health care provider! If the governor cared about all Iowans, this should be voted on by Iowans, not decided by her and the Legislature.By calling a special session and taxpayers dollars to try and get her way is very wrong.
07-09-2023
Bonnie Penno []
CON
MUST allow each woman to independently decide what is right for their bodies regarding reproductive rights.
07-09-2023
Juanita Williams [Cedar Valley Unitarian Universalist ]
CON
As a nurse working in the area of Women's Health, I am DEEPLY concerned about this infringement on our personal freedom to manage our own bodies and health choices. This will affect ALL of us and people we love, sooner or later. I am saddened and angered by the fact that this legislation, if passed, will affect poor women and women of color the most. This is another direct affront to our most vulnerable citizens. I ask that you take into consideration, as you consider your stand on this issue, the fact that at least 61% (and quite possibly more) of the Iowa population favors keeping abortion safe and legal. You are going against the will of the majority and imposing YOUR religious beliefs on others with this potential law. I am disappointed in the our State leaders and will vote accordingly (and actively engage others to do the same) when election time comes!
07-09-2023
Lindsey Fonkert [None]
CON
I am while heartedly against this bill. No one should be able to control a women's body, especially the government.
07-09-2023
Caroline Dieterle [â??â??]
CON
Taking away my right to control my own body fills me with rage: how dare you? That I and other women over half the total population would be made subject to the religious whims of a few fanatics and be deprived of our bodily autonomy shouldnt even be a proposal in our state legislature, a state whose motto is Our liberties we prize and our rights we shall maintain. This proposed law makes a mockery of that motto. Shame.
07-09-2023
Kaela Sasaki []
CON
You cannot take the reproductive rights away from women!
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Deery Brothers Ford Lincoln]
CON
Keep abortion legal part 6 weeks
07-09-2023
Jennifer Gardner []
CON
This is a healthcare decision that should be made between a woman and her doctor. Abortions will not end with this law. Women will die from abortion by unlicensed people. I am against this law taking rights away from women!
07-09-2023
Wendy Fry [None]
CON
I am writing to let you know my opinion on the Special Session being called this week in regards to abortion. I believe a womans right to her own body should be held inviolate; the only person who should be allowed to make decisions about a womans body is the woman, with guidance from her doctor and/or loved ones. Abortion rights are health rights. Abortions are not just used to end unwanted pregnancies. They are also used to empty the uterus when a fetus dies inutero but is not expelled (a missed miscarriage) or when a pregnancy is ectopic, or when a wanted pregnancy has been found to have terrible birth defects and the parent(s) decide to terminate based on that information. The Des Moines Register reports that a poll that they did shows that 61% of Iowans are in favor of abortion rights. Please follow the will of the Iowa people and continue to allow abortions for any reason up to the 20th week. Thank you,Wendy Fry
07-09-2023
Sharon Stubbs []
CON
A woman should have the right to control how many children she wants to have. This ban takes away that control. The government should not be able to take away that right.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Abortion should not be prohibited. The fetal heartbeat proposal or 6week rule is a joke as the medical profession says there is no heartbeat at 6 weeks. The legislature has no business practicing medicine. At least medical professionals are supposed to abide by the rule "first do no harm".
07-09-2023
Sara Perry []
CON
Any and all medical procedures should be a decision made between an individual and their physician. No politicians in the room!
07-09-2023
Kathleen M Winter [- Select -]
CON
Remember...you are the party of small government, keep your nose out of my healthcare.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [None ]
CON
The same party that said forcing someone to wear a mask in a global pandemic was tyranny now wants to control when Iowans begin a family. Do not try the pathetic for the babies tripe, weve seen how you care for Iowas vulnerable once they are born, giving up free federal money for children and families because God forbid it goes to someone other than GOP donors.
07-09-2023
Donna Ridlen []
CON
The government needs to stay out of this. It is a womans decision.Stop the government overreach!
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This bill is horrible. It is dangerous to women and removes the right of bodily autonomy. Medical care is a decision to be made between the woman and the doctor. Period. The politicians proposing this are not medical professionals and have no right making medical decisions.
07-09-2023
Nancy Budrevich [none]
CON
Laws to restrict or prevent abortions are not needed! Don't go back to the old days of back alley abortions with mutilated bodies because only rich could get medical abortions. Get out of the moral issues and let the women and medical world decide. Many young girls don't know they're pregnant until third month because of irregularity or other health issues.No government body, no male body, no female body has the right to decide what a another female body can do about an unwanted pregnancy. Abortion has always been an option, just not always legally. Even when an abortion is medically necessary, it is extremely difficult to accept this decision. Each person has to look deeply into her heart and soul to find the strength to do what is best for her. Let HER decide with peace of knowing whatever she decides SHE won't be breaking a law.Planned Parenthood should also allowed in state and federal medical programs. They give support and advice to many unwed women who do not have family support.
07-09-2023
Helen Trisko [Unaffiliated ]
CON
You cannot take away our access to health care. Please keep your church and beliefs out of the decisions that are made by individuals and healthcare professionals. If abortion is legal, many people, including, will leave Iowa for good. If you want to keep industry and workers in Iowa, do not go backwards. Please, do not ban abortion.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Government should not be involved in healthcare decisions. This is between a woman and her medical providers.
07-09-2023
Emily Paulsen []
CON
Abortion is healthcare and should be legal. Decisions about abortion should be made by the pregnant person and their doctor and no one else.
07-09-2023
Erin Lynn Gott []
CON
Self preservation NOT INDOCTRINATION. FEMALES HAVE A RIGHT TO THEIR OWN BODIES. THE GOVERNMENT DOES NOT OWN FEMALES. YOU ARE NOT GOD
07-09-2023
Jennifer Perry [N/A]
CON
I strongly oppose this reach by the government to control my body. This is about power and control and nothing else. If it was about being prolife then the party in power would be expanding public school funding, mental health, healthcare, and other necessary services. The republicans are probirth not prolife. Listen to your constituents and vote no.
07-09-2023
Jen Pavkov []
CON
Everyone has a right to decide if, when and how to become a parent.Pregnant people should be able to access the health care they need without shame, unnecessary restrictions or political interference. Iowans dont need more restrictions on health care. What is needed is barrierfree access to affordable health care, comprehensive sex education and access to birth control. A persons health, not politics, should guide important medical decisions at every point in a pregnancy. We all have strongly held personal beliefs about abortion, but pregnant people should be trusted to make health care decisions on behalf of themselves and their families.622% of women have an abortion because of an abusive partner.
Attachment
07-09-2023
Tambi Heiter []
CON
My health care decisions (and those of my daughter and granddaughter) should be left up to US and our doctors. If you dont want an abortion, then dont have one. But dont tell us what we can or cannot do regarding our own health care decisions. This is an overstep by this legislature.
07-09-2023
Wyatt Dowdy []
CON
Governor Kim Reynolds has no right to dictate what another woman does with her body and her reproductive organs. Considering Governor Reynolds difficult past with alcohol and DUIs, she should not be at liberty in the first place deciding what is, and is not responsible of another person. Hypocrisy at its finest.
07-09-2023
Evy Raes []
CON
This is a travesty. Ive heard so many statements of freedom and liberty from our governor. It is clear that these system only apply to those who look like her, believe like her, and who voted for her. Women should be the only people who make decisions about their own bodies. Prolife has come to mean pro fetus not pro life, as social safety net programs have been cut or defunded in Iowa. Trust women. Leave your religious beliefs at the church door.
07-09-2023
Benjamin Johnson []
CON
I am vehemently against this bill. Protecting the right to an abortion is fundamental health care, and this bill is a drastic government overreach that is against the will of the people of Iowa.
07-09-2023
Katy krapfl [None]
CON
This bill will harm women who need obstetric care, it will drive providers out of our state when we already are losing maternal care in rural areas. Please do not pass this bill that the the majority of Iowans are against
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I demand reproductive freedom!
07-09-2023
Ruth Johnson [Private citizen ]
CON
Iowa citizens are opposed to this legislation which threatens the health of women, as well as invading their privacy. Abortion is health care and as such decisions about it should be made between a woman and her doctor. This very personal decision should not be made by religious zealots pushing their beliefs on others. The damage done by this past legislative session has set Iowa back decades. Decisions were not based on what the majority of the people wanted. Do not further the damage to Iowas reputation and its citizens by passing this cruel abortion bill.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I demand my reproductive freedom and reproductive freedom for all women of Iowa. Vote NO!
07-09-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
Please respect peoples religious beliefs and freedom to practice as they see fit.No one is forced to get an abortion. No one is forced to participate in one. No one should be prevented from getting one, either. Freedom means people are allowed by their government to make decisions that are right for them. I respect whatever decision a woman makes about pregnancy, regardless of the circumstances in which the pregnancy occurred.Also I think that while certain religious leaders, politicians, and donors have a lot of knowledge, they dont have any business practicing medicine without a license. Even the politicians who are physicians are not *my* physician. I do not welcome their interference in my health care decisions. I would not dream of interfering in theirs.Thank you.
07-09-2023
Patsy Weldin []
CON
This is a terrible bill. Safe and legal abortion is necessary and is a right women will not give up.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
This bill will kill women. There have been thousands of stories of women being other dying or being left until in critical condition due to being denied access to medically necessary abortions. These are in states that claim to have exceptions. This bill is a blatant attempt for the government to step in and control one of the most personal and intimate decisions a person makes will ever make. If you want to reduce abortions, make healthcare universal and accessible to all. Increase the affordability and accessibility of child care. Provide new parents paid leave so they can have time to heal and bond with their child. Make contraception free and available to all. Provide comprehensive sex education in schools.
07-09-2023
Marissa Jennings [N/A]
CON
I am extremely opposed to this bill. Bodily autonomy is a basic human right. Women and people with uteruses deserve to control our bodies without the state of Iowa being involved. Restricting abortion access disproportionately impacts marginalized communities and jeopardizes the health and safety of the women of Iowa. Many Iowans are opposed to restricting reproductive healthcare, and lawmakers are just ignoring the will of their constituents by moving forward with this. It is despicable and another reason to dislike living in this state that is continuously sliding backward in time, creating more inequality, and harming its people. Abortion is healthcare, period.
07-09-2023
Kaitlyn Hanson [None]
CON
Keep government out of doctors' offices. Iowans will do the right thing in consultation with their doctor; we don't want the state deciding what is best for our bodies.
07-09-2023
Tiffiany DJ Dorothy []
CON
I DEMAND REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM! KEEP ABORTION SAFE AND LEGAL IN IOWA!
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am against this bill. I feel women should be allowed full autonomy over our own bodies. It is between the woman and her doctor, not the government. If you pass this hurtful bill, you would take away my freedom of choice and harm Iowans seeking safe abortions. Let abortion stay and focus on cleaning up the gun swamp.
07-09-2023
Aaron Friedel [None]
CON
Do not take away the freedom from my daughters to make the health care decisions that affect them. This is taking the opinions of some and imposing them over the freedom of others. It would be in direct opposition of the majority of Iowans. Wrong on so many levels.
07-09-2023
Tayler Garrison [Independent]
CON
I work in childcare and love each and every life born into this world. But it's heart breaking seeing kids in families that don't have the resources or mental capacity to take care of them. If I didn't have to work I would be offering to speak on this in person, no government should have the ability to control another's body. This is especially true when it comes to reproductive rights. If it was such a concern to Kim Reynolds she should propose a mandatory vasectomy law seeing as that prodecure can be reversed whereas forcing a life into this world cannot.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [N/a]
CON
This bill should not pass. 70% of Iowans want no change to abortion access in Iowa. It will lead to a loss of womens healthcare providers as evidenced by states like Idaho that have already seen a loss in providers. This is NOT what Iowans want.
07-09-2023
Alane Dunn []
CON
I am opposed to laws restricting a woman's right to an abortion, which is a personal healthcare decision she should have the autonomy to make on her own. I am vehemently opposed to restrictions prior to 12 weeks. Most women do not even know they are pregnant at 6 weeks. What is referred to as a fetal heartbeat is "a little flutter in the area that will become the future heart of the baby," said Dr. Saima Aftab, medical director of the Fetal Care Center at Nicklaus Children's Hospital in Miami. This flutter happens because the group of cells that will become the future "pacemaker" of the heart gain the capacity to fire electrical signals, she said.At this point a fetus is not viable outside of the mother's body. Therefore, is part of a woman's body and all decisions about this fetus should be her choice. In addition to opposition to a fetal heartbeat bill, I feel options must still be in place for abortions in the cases of rape, incest and the wellbeing of the mother. The wellbeing of live women must take priority over a fetus especially when it is not viable outside of the womb. I implore you to listen to the majority of Iowans that believe abortion should be kept legal and safe.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [None, live in Iowa]
CON
These decisions belong between a woman and her physician, not the responsibility of Kim Reynolds or any elected official
07-09-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
This is not what the majority of Iowans want. This is a hijackings of reproductive rights. We once again are proving that iowa is not a state for forward progress. Vote no. Iowans, both republican and democrats, stand for reproductive freedom.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Keep abortion safe and legal in Iowa. Protect womens rights.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [NA]
CON
I am against this bill. This is not what Iowans want and will hurt woman and girls.
07-09-2023
Jordin Appelhans [Concerned constituent ]
CON
Abortion bans and restrictions disproportionately affect marginalized people who cannot afford to travel to another state for care. They widen already gaping health inequities for people of color, (especially in Iowa) people with disabilities, people in rural areas, young people, and people with lowincomes, and make them more likely to be forced into pregnancy. Abortion bans are dangerous and harmful. Iowans deserve to have access to safe and legal abortion. I urge all legislators to reject this bill.
07-09-2023
Errin Frank [Self]
CON
Abortion is healthcare and should be decided upon by a woman and their physician.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Live in iowa]
CON
This a a decision for a woman to make, not the IA legislature
07-09-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
Party of small government should not allow the government to interfere in a women's medical decisions.
07-09-2023
Ericka Brokaw [Civilian ]
CON
Human right are superior to state judgement
07-09-2023
Jackie [Meunier ]
CON
I want my right to make decisions about my body without government interference. Thank you.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Self]
CON
I can not believe we are back to issues that remove rights from women.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
There will always be cases where abortion is needed. I know people who would not be alive today because they needed an abortion to save the life of the mother. Cancer in the mother, miscarriages that fail to eject the fetus and therefore lead to infection, and all kinds of things can occur. And in fact, I am especially for later abortions, because these are the times when the mother WANTED the child but something has gone horribly wrong. The last thing that family needs is to go through the trauma of the birth or risk the death of the mother. See that poor family in Florida who were forced to give birth to a child that could not breath and had to watch it suffocate in the minutes since its birth. That's not pro life. That's pro torture. And even more than that, restricting abortions is a violation of a woman's autonomy and hijacks her future. We don't force people to donate blood, organs, and parts of their body even when it is necessary for someone else's life. The same should be true of being forced to carry to term. Forcing people to birth and care for a child they do not want is a good way to instill trauma in everyone involved.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [Des Moines ]
CON
I am against taking away freedoms from women. Medical abortion care should be decided between a human and their doctor. Not the law.
07-09-2023
Carolina Ramos []
CON
Abortion bans force pregnant people to continue their pregnancies to delivery, leaving them to face the health risks associated with pregnancy and childbirth. In a country with high healthcare costs, high rates of uninsured individuals, and high rates of health problems, the last thing we should be is taking away a pregnant persons decision. Access to abortion enables people to make the decisions that are right for them and their individual circumstances. Law makers should not have the power to strip away someones fundamental right to personal autonomy. Abortion is health care. Abortion access saves lives. I urge legislators not to strip abortion access from Iowans.
07-09-2023
Anonymous [n/a]
CON
I have a 16yearold daughter, and if she isn't allowed to make her own health care decisions in collaboration with her doctor, we will have to consider moving to a different state. For sure we will encourage her to go to college in a state where she has freedom.
07-09-2023
Chris Friedrich []
CON
1. There is no fetal heart at 6 weeks. Therefore, there is no fetal heartbeat at 6 weeks. These are undeniable facts.2. A very large majority of Iowans believe abortion should be legal in most or all cases.(61% vs. 33%)3. The vast majority of people supporting this proposal are doing so because of religious reasons, in particular relating to some Christian denominations. There are many other religions who do not share this view on the morality of abortion. Therefore, any vote by an elected representative to support this bill based on religious grounds inherently violates the Establishment Clause of the US Constitution.4. Abortion and other reproductive heathcare procedures are part of general healthcare. As such, the state has no compelling interest or even any right to decide the appropriate healthcare for any citizen.
07-09-2023
Candella Foley-Finchem []
CON
You know someone who's had an abortion. If you think you don't know anyone who's had an abortion you are wrong. They just didn't tell you their abortion story. Why wouldn't they share that story with you? Well, it's not really any of your business, for one, and for another, if they haven't told you, it's possible they don't trust you with that information. There are so many reasons why someone may seek an abortion, and those reasons are too many to list in this box. They include ectopic pregnancies, other medical complications with the woman, bleeding gets its own line too, abnormal fetal development, the fetus dies, medical issues such as cancer which is incompatible with pregnancy, mental health issues which require medications that are incompatible with pregnancy, being put on bedrest for extended periods during previous pregnancies, other financial difficulties that are incompatible with pregnancy, having a job that is incompatible with pregnancy, being too young, too little to have a viable pregnancy, rape, incest, and so many other situations which truly are too many to list. Leave the decision to the pregnant woman who should consult her medical team, her loved ones, and her spiritual advisor, but leave the politicians out of those private medical decisions.
07-09-2023
Alyssa Muller []
CON
I dissent.
07-09-2023
Jonathan Berg []
CON
Women's healthcare issues should be between women and their doctors. The state legislature does not belong in the equation. Women will die because of this law. This is no exaggeration. We have seen the effects of similar laws on women in other states and countries. Abortion is healthcare. Stay out of personal private healthcare decisions.
07-09-2023
Gregory Hauenstein []
CON
The government does not belong in peoples private medical decisions. This is overreach at its worst.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I support a womens reproductive rights and their right to an abortion. This is a decision that needs to be made between a woman and her doctor. Women wont even know they are pregnant with this heartbeat bill As we have seen with antiabortion laws in other states, this law causes many issues that cant be foreseen or legislated. Protect womens freedoms to make decisions about their own bodies
07-09-2023
Ryan Howell [Ba]
CON
Abortion access is healthcare. This bill and legislature do nothing to actually help the children of Iowa. This bill does not represent the will of the majority of Iowans.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Im unable to make the meeting but I am vehemently against any restrictions to abortions and womens healthcare. Our bodies, our choice.
07-09-2023
Robyn Andrews [Concerned Citizen]
CON
There is no reason for uneducated politicians to be involved in medical decisions made between a patient and PROFESSIONAL doctor that has to go through YEARS of schooling and internship and on th job training. ESPECIALLY considering the majority deciding against it has absolutely zero idea on how pregnancies develop and work.Question to prove: WHAT WEEK OF PREGNANCY (WEEK 1 TO WEEK 40) DOES CONCEPTION TAKE PLACE? FYI most people dont even know that the "1st week" of the 40 weeks of pregnancy IS YOUR MENSTRUATION WEEK.You are on your period your first week of pregnancy, and conception doesn't happen until generally the "3rd" or "4th week" of pregnancy. Then your 4th or 5th week of "pregnancy" is generally the first day of a missed period. Leaving 1 week before the arbitrary "6rh week" of pregnancy to make one of thw biggest decisions of your life, let alone being able to schedule a consult and an appointment all in thw same week. Evwn Due Process for court allows for more time than that. And back to the original point, you all are not qualified professionals. I would not go to you about an abkle sprain, let alone a life altering medical decision.
07-09-2023
Ian Miller []
CON
Passing this bill will make everyone's life worse. It is cruel and inhumane. These are decisions for patients and health care providers, not for legislators.
07-09-2023
Chad Brewbaker []
CON
I did my masters thesis in computational tomography at ISU. The bill is missing heartbeat decibels and heart diameter which is arbitrary as passing a highway speed limit bill with no actual measurements. I suggest using the median measurements at the beginning of a third trimester as a placeholder then having debate from there.The only penalty under the law should be licensing removal. No woman wants Brenna Birds beak up their womb.
07-09-2023
Jill Fender []
CON
I demand reproductive freedom.Keep abortion safe and legal in Iowa.
07-09-2023
Sarah Singelee []
CON
Regarding the fetal heartbeat bill, there has been much said about the separations of the different branches of government. What about the equally fundamental separation of church and state that this country was founded on? With HSB 255, a bill prohibiting abortion after detection of a fetal heartbeat, proponents are motivated by the belief that they are protecting "unborn children" and "life" and, as evidenced by the legislators that signed onto The Family Leader's Brief of Amicus Curiae in the Iowa Supreme Court case no. 222036, there is a curious alignment of government elected officials with a religious lobbyist group.As government elected officials, you are tasked with maintaining a separation of church and state. Whatever your personal religious beliefs are, do not forget that imposing your religious beliefs on others via your position in the legislature is a misuse of power, position, and the law.This bill seeks to severely restrict the time window in which a woman may elect to have an abortion. At six to eight weeks of pregnancy, a fetal heartbeat may be detectable but a woman may not even know yet that she is pregnant. This bill takes away the individual rights, liberties, and bodily autonomy of a woman in favor of "rights" of "the unborn."In the language used to draft bills, there has been a striking lack of specificity in acknowledging the different developmental stages of zygote, embryo, fetus, baby, child. The use of "unborn child" throughout bills and legislation seems designed to evoke sympathy while being scientifically inaccurate terminology.If you induce labor on an eight, twelve, or sixteenweek pregnant woman what comes out is not a child, not a baby, but a nonviable and only partially developed fetus. That is the reality. Not euphemisms.Don't count your chickens before they hatch.I disagree with the assignment of any "right to life" to a fetus in the nonviable stage of development. With bills as restrictive as HSB 255, the State explicitly overrides the woman's sovereignty of her own body and effectively forces her to be a host to a wholly dependent organism that cannot survive without her. The State puts a higher value on the function of women as incubators than it does on women as individuals.Only if our species were nearing extinction would such laws be morally justified. With a current world population of more than 8 billion people, clearly human beings are going strong and some would say even overrunning the planet.In other respects I find the "right to life" arguments absurd. If you've only made it to the embryonic or early fetal developmental stages, you aren't going to be missing much upon termination. How can you, if you don't exist?Additionally, this is a slippery slope towards a total abortion ban. There is a religious segment of the population that zealously works to impose their religious dogma on everyone. They have organized to lobby the government to enact legislation that reflects their religious dogma so that the government becomes the one imposing it on everyone. This is as unAmerican as it gets.As for other moral questions, such as is this killing? Yes, this is killing. However, I do not consider it equivalent to killing a "born" human being. If we followed thou shalt not kill literally and without exception we would all be vegans and pacifists. My heart is somewhere in the middle as vegetarian and in favor of peace. Yet we benefit from living in a country protected by a military of service people who are professionally trained to kill. We live in a state where people make livelihoods from livestock. Death is part of life.Guns are designed to kill and maim yet we uphold the right to bear arms. Alcohol causes much misery, vehicular tragedies, and abuse, even if it is also associated with merriment. Prohibition didn't work.I looked at the State of Iowa Department of Health and Human Services 2021 Vital Statistics Report. In 2021, 2,992 abortions were medically induced and 768 were surgically induced, for a total of 3,760 reported medically and surgically induced abortions. About 85% of the abortions (3,212) were by unmarried women. 735 (19.5%) of the abortions were by black women and 2,548 (67.8%) were by white women. You can look at the report on pages 151156 for additional breakdown data. Most abortions occurred in the first thirteen weeks. 3,562 (94.7%) medically and surgically induced occurred in the first thirteen weeks. 198 (5%) medically and surgically induced occurred in weeks fourteen to twentyeight. There were zero reported abortions for weeks twentynine plus.After looking at the data, I wonder if this bill could result in women falling prey to taking substances sold illegally to induce abortion and experiencing health crises from that. As for surgical procedures, this country lived through a time preRoe where women were butchered because of desperately seeking illegal abortions. If you care about the health and safety of women, you should not be trying to restrict access to safe and legal abortions.At 19.5%, a disproportionate number of the abortions were by black women, when you consider that the black population in the state is around 4 to 5%.85% of the abortions were by unmarried women. I hope that Governor Reynolds is genuine in her personal convictions on this issue. However, I look at her with her husband and beautiful family and maybe she has had a positive experience in this way but not everyone has a husband or a stable family life or economic security. In some ways she seems out of touch and insensitive to the experiences of other women here. It's like she wants to legislate us into conforming to her vision of a white picket fence happilyeverafter that remains elusive for many.The State recommends adoption but that is not a panacea either. I can't imagine that most women would want to go through carrying a pregnancy to term, only to give the baby up. In many cases what it ends up being about is the removal of a baby from a mother who is powerless and poor and giving that baby to a family that is more powerful and wealthier. Adoption can be a special and good thing, but you cannot forget that it is at its core a family separation and often a failure of the state to provide sufficient social supports for single motherhood. That being said, there is a need for adoptive families and this is not meant to discourage anyone from adopting.Has there been a survey of the women in this state who have had abortions? Maybe as part of the reporting process there should be a detailed and anonymous survey given so that we can better understand the reasons that people in our state are choosing to have abortions. Maybe there should be a survey of the fathers too. As it is now, I feel like the narratives are moving but also anecdotal and inherently lopsided because not everyone is comfortable speaking publicly about this.If we want to reduce the number of abortions, we should try to better understand the reasons for them and address those issues. Not just pass a law that further restricts access.Remember that it's not about what you or I would personally do. It's about protecting the freedom of choice.Please vote no to HSB 255.Sincerely,Sarah Singele
07-09-2023
Troy []
CON
I do not support this special session, or this bill. Please do what the majority of Iowans want, and vote No. Then, go home and stop wasting taxpayer dollars trying to find ways to take away freedoms and opportunities from Iowans.
07-09-2023
Terri Finley [Iowan]
CON
Womens rights are human rights.
07-09-2023
Anonymous []
CON
We just can't do this. It's not our decision to make. God is the ultimate judge. We are deciding what other people can do with their bodies. Let go and let God ! It between a a woman and God, no one else has that right.
07-09-2023
Kelsey Whalen [Healthcare professional]
CON
As a woman, a nurse, and a mother of 2, I beg our representatives not to pass legislation banning abortion, or passing legislation furthering limiting access to abortion services. Abortion bans harm women, girls, and families.Our leading medical associations such as the AMA, the ANA, the ACOG, and the AAP, all agree tat abortion bans create dangerous and vulnerable situations for patients, and increase poor outcomes for women/ girls of childbearing age. Abortion bans are not based in science, and the evidence available suggests abortion bans lead higher instances or mortality and morbidity for pregnant women/ girls. Abortion bans are inherently discriminatory against women. It is not the right of the state to treat pregnant women and girls as wards of the state should they fall pregnant. It is not the right of the state to tell a women or a child they have no other option than to continue a pregnancy. Pregnancy is a risk to the pregnant persons life. A pregnant person is at much higher risk of stroke, blood clots, hypertension, organ failure, hemorrhage, and death. It is not the right of the state to disregard these risks and remove consent from the pregnant person.Abortion bans continue the cycle of poverty, and the cycle of child hunger. Abortion bans ignore nuance and treats women as second class citizens with no agency to dictate their own lives and bodies.I fear for my daughters futures in an Iowa than bans abortion.It is not the right of the state to remove the abortion services to women and girls. Thousands of women have used these services since abortion become legal in the 1970s.How can you ignore history where women suffered and died from lack of access to care that resulted from the abortion bans of the times?It is not the right of the state to put women into vulnerable positions, to disenfranchise them as citizens.Half of those who seek abortions are already mothers. How dare the state act like they know what is best for these peoples families.Abortion bans are inherently wrong. Dont be on the wrong side of history, Iowa.
07-09-2023
Susan Olesen [None]
CON
Judaism and Buddhism both believe life begins when babies take their first breath. Most evangelical Christians and some Catholics might believe that life begins at conception. Our country is built on freedom of religion and those who embrace the American dream certainly must recognize that we cannot be driven by one religious doctrine or any religious doctrine. The first amendment says that Congress will make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof. It doesnt say that the first amendment applies to all places but Iowa and the governor and the Iowa legislature can supersede the Congress. Iowa isnt Saudi Arabia that is governed by Islamic Rule or Vatican City ruled by the Pope. A womans decision to have an abortion, or not, is very private, bound in each womans religion, her family, her physician, and anyone else she might want to include. But it is not the states role to interfere in womens reproductive health.
07-09-2023
Jess Bierling []
CON
Reality does not care about the intentions of lawmakers. Not all pregnancies can be carried to term and end in a healthy birth. Fetuses have complications that end in stillbirth. Ectopic pregnancies occur. Conditions such as anencephaly occur. Multiple other reasons that require abortion occur. Passing a ban on abortion after 6 weeks will cause unneeded grief, trauma, and sometimes death to pregnant people. The decision to abort a pregnancy should never be prevented by law. A persons autonomy should be respected, especially since the is is what citizens of this state hear from Republican lawmakers regularly.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Keep abortion safe and legal. Iowa women don't need politicians telling them what they can and cannot do with their bodies. Do not take away women's bodily autonomy.
07-10-2023
Susan Hassman []
CON
This is not not a matter government should involve itself in. It is a health issue and and politicians are not qualified to make these decisions.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Medical decisions should always remain between an individual and their provider. Elected officials have no business imposing restrictions on an individual's medical choices. Abortion is a medical decision for a woman to make.
07-10-2023
Jamie Achenbaugh []
CON
So much for parents choice,huh? Nobody wants to get an abortion. It's a personal medical decision that is so different in every situation.
07-10-2023
Michael Fox []
CON
This bill is preposterous. What this bill defines as a heartbeat is an electrical signal without an actually formed heart.
07-10-2023
Elizabeth [Anderson]
PRO
Stop telling us what we can and can't do with our bodies I've never felt more violated in my life
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
These laws need to stop. In 2016, I was able to carry and give birth to my first and only child. She will be my only. Why? Because the pregnancy put so much stress on my kidneys and liver that they shut down. I now have permanent damage to both. This law will effectively be a death sentence for me. I CAN NOT SURVIVE ANOTHER PREGNANCY. I am trying my hardest to prevent that as is, but being a married woman, I should be able to be intimate with my husband of 20 years! And do you have ANY idea how hard it is to get a tubal? I've been turned away from 7 doctors so far! I always thought Iowa was prowoman. Don't disappoint me.
07-10-2023
Gary Ellis [Individual ]
PRO
I am prolife. I believe life begins at conception. A new law should respect women and their situation and offer assistance to encourage them to understand the life that lives within them. It should also eliminate abortions at the earliest reasonable time with exceptions for rape, incest and medical situations like ectopic pregnancy which are life threatening to the mother.Protect our unborn children.
07-10-2023
Katherine Bryden [ISSWSH member]
CON
I am a woman. I am a midwife and women's health nurse practitioner. I take care of women at all life stages, pregnant and not pregnant. I am very strongly opposed to government interference in women's healthcare decisions. I do not support a legislative ban on abortions. They are mostly done in the first trimester of pregnancy. Second trimester abortions often come with very sad, heartbreaking circumstances (a wanted pregnancy with a fetal anomaly incompatible with life, a teen who was raped and didn't tell anyone for months after, a woman in an abusive relationship, for just a few examples). And "late term abortions" would be vanishingly few in number, and never done for a cavalier reason. Working in maternity care, I can tell you that after 24 weeks, if there is threat to the mother's life, the baby is DELIVERED EARLY and goes to Blank Children's Hospital or UIHC Stead Children's Hospital for millions of dollars of NICU care. Abortions, particularly in the first trimester, are very safe procedures. They can be lifesaving for women, when we consider the sum total of what a woman's life is her health, her happiness, her existing relationships, her value as a complete human being. They are the right decision for the vast majority of people who choose not to carry a pregnancy, with one study finding that after 5 years, more than 97.9% of study participants who had abortions felt it was the right decision for them. (Emotions and decision rightness over five years following an abortion: An examination of decision difficulty and abortion stigmaAuthor links open overlay panel; Corinne H. Rocca a, Goleen Samari a b, Diana G. Foster a, Heather Gould a, Katrina Kimport a; Citation: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112704)As women, we know what is right for us. Part of our basic human rights as American citizens include a right to decide what to do with our bodies we should be able to decide who we have sex with, who we have babies with, how many, and when. We would never take this right away from men, and women are supposed to be equal citizens.I had an abortion when I was 19 years old. I was grateful to the women who fought for my right to my own body, won in 1973, the year I was born. I guess I was naive, but I took it as a given that I had the right to control what happened inside my own body. Having an abortion allowed me to finish college, avoid poverty, avoid having a lifelong tie to a person to whom I did not wish to have a long duration relationship with, and allowed me to have the life, marriage, and children I have now. I have never regretted having an abortion. I am going to be on call at a hosptial delivering babies and cannot come to Des Moines on July 11th to protest, but my heart and every fiber in my being is crying out in protest that my government should not be taking away the rights of my friends, my patients, and my sister Iowans to control our own bodies. We are not incubators, vessels, or farrowing sows. We are fullfledged human beings who demand bodily autonomy and the right to privacy and options in medical decision making, including the right to access safe abortions when we and our medical teem deem an abortion to be in our best interests. I will always land on the side of the already existing women.And PS: if you do ban abortions, you had jolly well better expand postpartum Medicaid coverage for a calendar year, as well as reinstituting the easy, free access to all forms of birth control, and give women and their babies a year of stipended maternity leave and a guarantee of return to their place of employment. You could do those things anyway, if you really value The Babies.
07-10-2023
Teresa Boxleiter []
CON
Iowans support freedom of choice
07-10-2023
Shari Weitzenkamp [Not applicable ]
CON
I am against any changes to Iowas abortion laws.
07-10-2023
Frances Renfer [Myself]
CON
This bill is a violation of womens right to privacy! Women have the right to safe reproductive health care!
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Our Liberties We Prize and Our Rights We Will Maintain? Unless Bob Vander Plats disagrees? Or our Governor decides to tack right to gather political support and ego building national attention? Signed a formerly proud born and raised Iowan
07-10-2023
Anonymous [none]
CON
I am starting a family with one child already. I am against this bill as if there were any complications with any future pregnancies my wife, or any other women expecting, this bill would endanger the woman's life as it stops the doctor from making clinical decisions that could protect the mothers life. I can only imagine the heartache of not only losing an expecting child but also my wife and mother of my child. Please let doctors make the decision on medically necessary abortions not government officials.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Democratic Party ]
CON
Politics should not have the ability to make choices regarding my health. Those choices should be made by me In consultation with my family and my physician.
07-10-2023
Kimberly Mincey []
CON
Please leave our reproductive life alone. Please don't roll us back in time! My body! My choice!
07-10-2023
Virginia Williams []
CON
No one OWNS a woman's body. She is in control of what SHE does with it. Not the government. It is wrong for the governor to impose her views on everyone else. Women have the right to make their own decisions and get an abortion if they want or need it. They DON'T have to ask for permission. Their body belongs to THEM, not the Governor. She is overstepping.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The majority of Iowans do not support this bill. The 6 week fetal heartbeat rule is ridiculous. Listen to the doctors who know better when a heartbeat really occurs. They know better then legislators. Stop trying to control womens bodies. Dont ever say you are prolife when you are only probirth. You have no regard for children after they are born.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Iowa citizen]
CON
A womans right to an abortion should not involve the government.
07-10-2023
Any Luttinger []
CON
Politicians should stay out of personal and medical decisions!!! If you are opposed to abortion, dont have one. But stay out of other peoples private lives. Look at how badly this is going in the states that have passed this type of legislation. Doctors are leaving states like idaho, hospitals are closing in rural areas, and many womens lives are endangered whether they dont have access to medical care to give birth or to have a medically necessary abortion. This does not affect only those who want to have an abortion for personal reasons.
07-10-2023
Susan Young [Lucky Star Farm]
CON
I demand reproductive freedom!Keep abortion safe & legal in Iowa.VOTE NO on banning abortion in Iowa.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Thome]
CON
Reproductive rights should be maintained in Iowa. Decisions should be left health care provider and woman. Vote NO!
07-10-2023
Joyce [Baker]
CON
Abortion is a right to privacy issue. IT IS SUPPORTED BY A MAJORITY OF IOWANS OF ALL POLITICAL persuasions. Follow the will of your constituents and put your teligious personal preferences aside. As a Social Eorker and a woman I OPPOSE this bill. Vote NO.
07-10-2023
Katy Thoreson []
CON
Reproductive freedom is a right.
07-10-2023
Melissa Hancock []
CON
Women make their own medical decisions. The government has no role to play here.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
This is a bill intended to take away a womans right to choose. Women in Iowa must retain the right to safe abortion for any reason.
07-10-2023
Ashley Shewmaker [None]
CON
Reproductive freedom is a human right.
07-10-2023
Kelly [Smith]
CON
Listen to your constituents. Keep your religion out of politics and off our bodies. Abortion is healthcare and women have the sole right to determine what happens to their bodies.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I cant feel free in America without freedom to make my own personal medical decisions. Choices about my reproductive system should stay between me and my medical professionalthey should not be restricted by anyone else. Following through with bans and undue limitations on medical care is harmful to individuals and to public health.
07-10-2023
Barb Diment [Barb Diment Law Office, PLC]
CON
The bill is fundamentally flawed and profoundly wrong for our State. The bill violates the religious liberties of many by choosing one Christian position over Jewish or other protected classes who believe abortion may be required. It is inhumane to children who may be forced to give birth and failing to include severe psychological trauma to that child and in assessment of medical emergency. The exceptions are effectively eliminated by unreasonable conditions. The bill is immoral in leading to needless delay in care, pain and death. Ectopic pregnancies and medical risks require abortion as healthcare. Iowans expect privacy in their family tragedies and personal medical decisions. The doctors office is no place for Big Government involvement and OB/GYNs will leave Iowa or practice elsewhere. The majority of Iowans disapprove of this bill and will vote out this Governor and all GOP members who vote for this atrocity in legislation. A 1 1/2 hour hearing is effectively a closed GOP session on a matter of vital importance to all Iowans. The GOP has acted to deny amendment and deny a reasonable democratic process which is unconscionable.
07-10-2023
Angie Ferguson []
CON
I have a daughter who have had several chemical pregnancies along with a few miscarriages. Had this been in effect, she would have died. She would have left behind a son. A child who wasnt even 7 years old. What about the child who is already alive?! What about the womans life?! If this is prolife, we should be more worried about the actual woman who is already alive, already breathing on their own. And what about those children 10 and younger who are not old enough to drive, babysit another child, who rely on their parents for their life? Why is it ok to force them, after being raped or molested end up pregnant to have a child? As far as adoption, there are too many who want or need to be adopted already? This law will only force women to have back alley abortions which will also lead to death. I wouldnt do it, but I will not tell a woman what to do with her body!
07-10-2023
Alex Klyn []
CON
I am very much against this bill. Let women have the freedom to choose what they wish with their bodies. It is none of my business what happens between a woman and her doctor.
07-10-2023
Brad Jensen []
CON
Politicians should not be making medical decisions. A womans health should be decided by her and her doctor. Putting these decisions in the hands of politicians puts womens lives at risk. It is arrogant of legislators to think they are in a better position to make these difficult life decisions and override the medical professionals. Next time you need surgery do you want your colleagues to step in and dictate what your doctor can and cannot do? Of course not! Stop this stupidity. It is insulting and patronizing to women. Your religious views should have no bearing on this decision.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Do not take away a woman's right to her own healthcare.
07-10-2023
Gregory Hauenstein []
CON
The government does not belong in peoples private medical decisions. This is overreach at its worst.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I have a chronic illness that makes pregnancy very dangerous for me, but I still want a child. If abortion becomes illegal or difficult to obtain it will destroy my chances of having a family in Iowa. It could kill me. Please do not do this.
07-10-2023
Shelley Skuster [N/A]
CON
What proLIFE message are we sending women if were mandating what they can/cant do with their healthcare? Trust women. Believe them. Let them make their own decisions about their bodies and health.
07-10-2023
Jackie [Meunier ]
CON
I want my right to make decisions about my body without government interference. Thank you.
07-10-2023
Laura Odeen []
CON
Abortion restrictions are wrong, take away bodily autonomy and will force the younger population of Iowa out.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Most Iowans want the power of abortion to be a decision between a woman and their doctor. It should not be political fodder.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
These restrictions are not based on sound science, and constitute undue restrictions on womens' rights based on misplaced religious selfrighteousness.
07-10-2023
Carolyn Kelly [N/a]
CON
I am very strongly opposed to any legislation that further limits reproductive freedom in the state.
07-10-2023
Amanda Moellering []
CON
I am against any legislation that bans abortion. This ban is a fundamental reduction of a womans human rights. I no longer recognize this State that I used to be so proud yo call home. Our representatives are elected to represent the will of the people and a strong majority of Iowans do not want this legislation.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This special session is not needed.
07-10-2023
Jennifer [Citizen]
CON
Abortion access should be between a patient and their medical provider and should be available at any stage of pregnancy:
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Myself]
CON
Keep the government out of the doctors office. I can't believe this is even happening. What the hell happened to this state? I will move myself and my family out of Iowa if this passes.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This bill will cause harm to so many women. Limiting reproductive freedom is a detriment to Iowa and the people who live here.
07-10-2023
Kristin Johnson []
CON
I need you to know how important reproductive rights are for women and girls. Can you imagine not having control of your own body? What would it be like if others were to tell you that you need to donate organs in order to save other peoples lives? I dont think you really have to be concerned about that happening, but this is the closest comparison I can think of. Pregnancy and giving birth can be wonderful experiences, but they are also both scary and risky. Women and girls need to be able to control their own bodies just as you are able to have control of yours.Take time to read opposing views to yours to understand why some females opt for abortions. Be informed. Be compassionate. This is a critical healthcare issue for females.To represent people in our district, please vote in the interest of all and not just the people who elected you. (Many of those who are opposed are men and older females, neither of whom will be affected by an unplanned and risky pregnancy.) If you look at the polling numbers, 61% of Iowans believe women should have access.And finally, to limit abortions, please do so through making education and birth control more accessible.
07-10-2023
07-10-2023
John Colombo []
CON
Just let people live their lives and make decisions for themselves. This cant be the pinnacle of human rights in this country. I dont want to wake up in forty years having watched as the freedom our ancestors fought for eroded into some sudo christian fascist state. This isnt popular, and its not going to do anything. This is lunacy.
07-10-2023
Valerie Koster, CNM []
CON
There is no need for the Iowa government to interfere in women's health care. Women, with the help of their health care professionals, should make their own health care decisions. As a nursemidwife, I also know that an early abortion ban will have unintended consequences for women when it comes to care for conditions such as ectopic pregnancy, preterm premature rupture of membranes, miscarriage, and more.
07-10-2023
Jennifer Cruz [Iowa voter]
CON
I am against abprtion regulations that come before the doctor and patients choices I am registered republican. I will be watching this vote closely to know who to never vote for.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
Abortion is a matter best decided between the concerned woman and her doctor. It has nothing whatsoever to do with legislators, who are not the ones dealing with the issues involved: pregnancy and the raising of unwanted children.As such, I vehemently oppose a ban on abortion.
07-10-2023
susan flansburg []
CON
I demand full access to health care for all Iowans. Full access to health care INCLUDES ABORTION. Protect women's health. Keep abortion legal.
07-10-2023
Jennifer Breister []
CON
I vehemently oppose any restriction on women's rights to make decisions about their bodies and their healthcare.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Self]
CON
Any bill that polices someone's body is not a bill that I will support. All this bill does is get in the way of medical professionals and prevent science from taking precedence over emotions.
07-10-2023
Katherine Manion [None]
CON
Stop interfering with womens medical care. You are not medical professionals. Abortion is healthcare.
07-10-2023
Brandi Janssen []
CON
I am strongly opposed to restrictions on abortion care for the following reasons:Restricting abortion care negatively affects maternal health outcomes, putting women's lives at risk. Restricting abortion care infringes on the rights of women in the state of Iowa to make their own health care decisionsRestricting abortion care will have negative economic effects on the state. We are pushing people out of Iowa with numerous laws that reduce Iowans' rights and access to health care.A majority of Iowans support abortion rights, so this bill is NOT consistent with the will of voters in the state. Continuing to claim that this is what Iowans want is a lie.Please vote no.
07-10-2023
Priya []
CON
There are many issues and concerns that I have with this bill. The first being that 61% of Iowans are against further restrictions on abortion. This is not a popular bill. Second, there will be many OBGYN physicians and nurses who end up leaving this state in order to look for employment in other states. This will be severely problematic for our healthcare system and for labor and delivery especially . Considering all of the initiatives that are currently being done to address a lack of staffing and numerous issues in the healthcare system, this law pushes back against those initiatives. You can say that this law addresses all medical emergencies, but at what point? Do OBGYNs need to wait until the mother is bleeding to death before they can address it? What about ectopic pregnancies where the egg attaches inside the fallopian tube and stays? OBGYNs will not want to put their license on the line and women will die because of this bill. We need to listen to the medical professionals. We need the legislature to stay out of the exam rooms and out of womens bodies.
07-10-2023
Cheryl R Wieseler [Cluck Ewe Farm and Bakery]
CON
Abortion is healthcare! Many states are already seeing the danger of misguided bans such as this. Women are being left to suffer during miscarriages and nearly dying of sepsis due to these bans. Children as young as 10 are expected to risk their lives to go through a pregnancy, which could destroy their futures. Not to mention the number of states already losing doctors and whole OB departments. This is not about life, this is about control of women's bodies and about imposing extremist religious views on others. It is wrong, and Reynolds knows it's wrong. The majority of Iowans and Americans support a woman's right to choose. Passing this law will be one more reason for Americans to vote the republican party into oblivion!
07-10-2023
Leslie Carpenter []
CON
I am adamantly opposed to this bill. It will effectively ban abortion because most women dont know they are pregnant. It will endanger women who need miscarriage management. It denies my religious and personal liberty to make this decision myself. As a retired genetic counselor I know this will force continuation of non viable pregnancies like anencephaly . It will prevent selective termination to save a twin. Every pregnancy carries maternal health risk. . Forcing a woman to risk her health and life for a fetus that is unlikely to live after birth is wrong. Forcing a child to carry a pregnancy her body cannot handle physically or mentally is cruel. This GOP bill puts religion in government and ignores medical needs of women. It is horribly wrong.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
No to a fetal heartbeat bill! There is too much grey area, some fatal fetal defects still allow the fetus to have a heartbeat up until they are born and have to live a tortured few hours of existence outside the womb. Women and their doctors need the freedom to be able to make the decision how to handle these situations. Women will die if this type of law is put in place. No no no!
07-10-2023
Thea McLain Nicholas [Pleasant Aerie Arts Programs]
CON
Women's rights are human rights.
07-10-2023
Michael Shortley []
CON
Women have been told what we can do and no do for hundreds of years! The government DOESN'T OWN MY BODY and has no business being in my uterus! MY BODY MY CHOICE! MY BODY MY CHOICE!!
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Most women do not even know they are pregnant at six weeks. I didnt. Iowas current law on abortion is sufficient and should be left as is.
07-10-2023
Melissa Serenda []
CON
"Our Liberties We Prize and Our Rights We Will Maintain".This bill does the opposite on both counts. Government does not belong between citizens and their healthcare providers, and Government shouldn't be making decisions about when couples should have children or how many children they should have. And Government certainly shouldn't be imposing the personal religious beliefs of legislators and their lobbyists on our state's citizens.
07-10-2023
Sara C []
CON
Banning abortion does not save any lives. If bans like this went into effect, more babies would just be born into unwanted homes, homes with drug abuse or domestic violence. Born into poverty, lack of resources & potential abuse. The DHS, foster system, Medicaid etc would be strained more than it already is. For all of history, simply telling people to not have sex unless they can care for a child has never worked. You dont have to agree with abortion but it should always remain a choice. And other peoples choices do NOT have to reflect you or your religious beliefs. Please stop these bills from advancing. It will only bring many more problems to communities. It is not saving anything.
07-10-2023
Katelyn Miller []
CON
Abortion is a healthcare issue and should not be limited by government
07-10-2023
Mindy Stark []
CON
State and Federal Governments have no place in this decision. Please remember their are many 'grey' areas when procedures are medically necessary. It isn't always displayed as black and white. Not speaking of race here.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Despite the rhetoric Governor Kim Reynolds and the GOP publicly spout that they are "for" the protection of children and the preservation of life, policies such as defunding public education ("School Choice Vouchers") serve as proof that they are not. "Prolife" policies would look like the following: continued and guaranteed access to public education for ALL, access to early start programs for prek students (currently preschool is "need based" and therefore inaccessable to some), free instate tuition for state Universities and colleges, accessible and affordable healthcare, guaranteed parental postpartum leave, any kind of plan for sheltering the homeless or a way to stabilize the housing market so citizens wouldn't be one late payment away from eviction or ridiculous rent increases at the hands of greedly landlords, supporting an increase in the minimum wage. The list is endless. Instead, they wage a culture war by denying access to school locker rooms for trans students and requiring teachers to report to a student's parents if they request to use pronouns not matching their assignedatbirth gender. Kim Reynolds and the GOP do not care about life. They care about the preservation of their Christian nationalist ideals. They care about upholding a system that gave them access to power while allowing them to continue to oppress others. Kim Reynolds chooses to wield her power over others by holding special sessions such as this because left to a ballot, Iowans would uphold access to abortions. Antiabortion laws give government too much power over an individual's body and their choice to bear life. It gives the government too much say in an individual's medical decisions. It gives the government too much. Period.
07-10-2023
Diana Fern [Blessings in Birth]
CON
Womens bodily autonomy and choice is not for a state legislature to determine.Women need to have all available health care options!
07-10-2023
Whitney Armstrong [None]
CON
I absolutely do not support any kind of bill restricting reproductive freedom in the state of Iowa. It is a vital aspect of Healthcare that must be kept between a woman and her physician. Government should play no part.
07-10-2023
Charlotte Triplett []
CON
There are many reasons this bill is going to do more to destroy women in Iowa than help them. The first goes back to one simple line: separation of church and state. The life before conception nonsense is fearmongering from religious sects at bear and ignorance at worst. 1/3 if the US believes in that religion, making it a minority, and yet we see it time and time again attempting to push its ideals as mainstream. They try to control politics while claiming they don't have to pay the state or country because they are separate. The second reason is based on science, which it seems many of our politicians choose to selectively ignore. Death by scientific standards and therefore medical standards is by brain health. A heart stops and CPR is done to try to get it going again. Why? Because brain activity is what determines life. Unless politicians are also saying CPR should be illegal, they shouldn't be saying life is defined by a heartbeat. That's called selective ignorance and it has no place in Pele who are attempting to run our state unless the place they're trying to run it is into the ground. The third reason is medical availability: When I was 11 my mother moved to the UofI to practice medicine. Specifically to help women. Even retired ages still fighting to help women get the best medical care available. One of the biggest issues she's talked about is availability in rural areas. Small clinics and the like can't afford to attract staff and maintain their facilities. There's no real access to care. Meanwhile, instead of actually fixing the problem, Iowa is looking to alienate medical staff even further. Doctors will begin to look elsewhere and Iowa will further fall behind in the availability and ultimately progress of its practices. Finally, it is important to consider the so called "exceptions" to this bill. I found out I was pregnant 5 weeks after. I was lucky that I was overjoyed at this news. Many women are not. I took the opportunity to begin making appointments for myself. With the staffing issues mentioned above, the first appointment available was 3 weeks away and that was well before Covid. What would it be now? What would guarantee women access? Nothing. What about the court system? A young girl gets raped by a family member. She gets pregnant. Now you're asking her to be comfortable coming forward, find out she's pregnant, get an appointment, and go to court. The average time for resolutions of cases like that? 46 months. You're taking away her choice while piling on even more fear. Finally, let's talk about money. Many Iowans are not in the financial position to add a child into their household. They're not even in a position to be able to afford a doctor visit, let alone a stay in the hospital, formula, diapers, extra food, and all the other expenses that new moms face. So, in a state that claims to care so much about its people... who is going to pay for every expense for this child they're forcing to come into a world that has no place for it? There are 2 closing thoughts that come to mind. One of them is that this bill is locking women into cages leading to dark alleys and illegal/ dangerous decisions. The other is: why does our female governor seem to hate women so much that she would enable laws that will do nothing but harm them?
07-10-2023
Scott Saunders [Private individual]
CON
I want to keep HEALTHCARE, including abortion and contraception, safe and legal in the state of Iowa. We've repeatedly seen circumstances in other states after they pass abortion restrictions that these restrictions have serious and fatal results for people.
07-10-2023
Scott Breitbach []
CON
As an Iowa resident, I strongly oppose any additional restrictions on reproductive freedoms and individual bodily autonomy. Abortion is healthcare and should not be further restricted in Iowa, especially at a point so early that many women don't even know yet that they are pregnant. These restrictions are dangerous and will cost lives.
07-10-2023
Melinda James []
CON
I want to be sure that by con you understand that I am against any action that limits a womans access to abortion. Im extremely opposed to the unreasonable restrictions that Governor Kim Reynolds is proposing this week.
07-10-2023
Phyllis Hoifeldt []
CON
Despite the rhetoric Governor Kim Reynolds and the GOP publicly spout that they are "for" the protection of children and the preservation of life, policies such as defunding public education ("School Choice Vouchers") serve as proof that they are not. "Prolife" policies would look like the following: continued and guaranteed access to public education for ALL, access to early start programs for prek students (currently preschool is "need based" and therefore inaccessable to some), free instate tuition for state Universities and colleges, accessible and affordable healthcare, guaranteed parental postpartum leave, any kind of plan for sheltering the homeless or a way to stabilize the housing market so citizens wouldn't be one late payment away from eviction or ridiculous rent increases at the hands of greedly landlords, supporting an increase in the minimum wage. The list is endless. Instead, they wage a culture war by denying access to school locker rooms for trans students and requiring teachers to report to a student's parents if they request to use pronouns not matching their assignedatbirth gender. Kim Reynolds and the GOP do not care about life. They care about the preservation of their Christian nationalist ideals. They care about upholding a system that gave them access to power while allowing them to continue to oppress others. Kim Reynolds chooses to wield her power over others by holding special sessions such as this because left to a ballot, Iowans would uphold access to abortions. Antiabortion laws give government too much power over an individual's body and their choice to bear life. It gives the government too much say in an individual's medical decisions. It gives the government too much. Period.
07-10-2023
John True []
CON
The Legislature and Governor have no right to try to outlaw abortion at this early of a stage. Stop with your overreach which is nothing more than trying to appease your elite donors.
07-10-2023
Emi Swope [N/A]
CON
Every woman has the right to make medical decisions with her doctor about her own body. Anything else is unsafe.
07-10-2023
Troyce Fisher [Ret]
CON
Republicans tout themselves as the party of small government. Stay out of womens lives and difficult decisions they must make with the help of their providers. You claim to be prolife. You are not. You are only probirth. What about a teenager whose life will be forever altered by an unwanted pregnancy? Rape and incest victims? Women whose lives are threatened by carrying an unhealthy fetus? 65 per cent of Iowans favor abortions. Who are you REALLY representing?
07-10-2023
Eric Eller []
CON
This is not the will of the vast majority of Iowans! It puts women at risk and treats them as less than in making healthcare decisions.
07-10-2023
Rita Brannan [NA]
CON
I am opposed to HSB 255. This issue does not belong in the Iowa Legislature. A women's right to abortion or any health issue is between her and her doctor period (not the government). (No special session should have been called. This is a total waste of taxpayer dollars. The majority of Iowan's are against HSB 255. I am asking our legislators to vote against this.)
07-10-2023
Wendy Snelling []
CON
Vote no. Women are not 2nd class citizens. Abortion is healthcare. Vote no.
07-10-2023
Nancy Jones []
CON
This is a disaster of a bill and not at all what the majority of Iowans want. It discriminates against rural Iowa, minorities and the poor.
07-10-2023
Tracy Creason []
CON
The Governor and Republican lawmakers have spent the 2023 session passing laws in the name of parental rights from banning books to funding private education using taxpayer dollars and now you call a special session to take away one of the most fundamental and personal parental rights, reproductive healthcare. Abortion is healthcare! Every Iowan has the right to make personal, reproductive healthcare decisions. These decisions belong with the individual and not with government. When you bring your personal and sometimes religious views into government, your narrow views take away parental decisions and responsibilities from people and limit the freedom most Iowans deserve. When you pass laws based on your personal beliefs you take away the ability for Iowans to make healthcare decisions for themselves. You are not protecting lives; you are endangering the lives of Iowans. There are numerous reasons someone makes reproductive healthcare decisions, those reasons are private, personal and no ones business, especially the government. You are being hypocritical as you claim you want to protect the rights of Iowans, but you only want to protect those that follow your values. While Iowans elected you, they did not elect you to govern our bodies or our reproduction. Passing restrictive abortion bans will only harm Iowans. You need to leave the current laws on abortion intact and allow Iowans the right to make reproductive healthcare decisions for themselves.reproductive healthcare is a personal, medical decision made by the person and potentially their doctor. This is not a decision made by a politician. I value life and respect science, medicine and the personal decisions made by those involved. Your comments should include compassion for the person making this decision, not having to fight or argue as to why. They should not have to worry about hate or fear their decision will bring on violence or penalties of law. Your comments should also include this is not our decisions as politicians.These very restrictive laws put patients and doctors at risk. Patients are dying. Doctors are held to do no harm as politicians are forcing them to choose between helping their patients or breaking the law. Politicians do not know the circumstances of the person making these decisions, yet they judge based on their personal beliefs and values.As Governor Reynolds and her band of Republican lawmakers want to pass a 6week abortion law based on their own personal beliefs and values they go against medicine, science and even the religious beliefs of Iowans. According to experts, the term fetal heartbeat is misleading and medically inaccurate.According to the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) it is clinically inaccurate to use the word heartbeat to describe the sound that can be heard on ultrasound in very early pregnancy. In fact, there are no chambers of the heart developed at the early stage in pregnancy that this word is used to describe, so there is no recognizable heartbeat. Until the chambers of the heart have been developed and can be detected via ultrasound (roughly 1720 weeks of gestation), it is not accurate to characterize the embryos or fetuss cardiac development as a heartbeat. What pregnant people may hear is the ultrasound machine translating electronic impulses that signify fetal cardiac activity into the sound that we recognize as a heartbeat. I urge you to get all the facts and leave the current law intact.This is a very important decision for Iowans!Tracy Creason
07-10-2023
Sue Thompson []
CON
The sovereignty of each person's dominion over their body is elemental to civilization, and must not be subject to debate.
07-10-2023
Monica Hamilton []
CON
It has been demonstrated numerous times in states that have put bans on womens healthcare, that it increases fatalities and trauma for those seeking help from their trusted physicians.Leave the government out of the Dr.s office.
07-10-2023
Margaret Conrad [Self ]
CON
It has been articulated in this comments as well as through various other media why this bill should not be passed. It will not stop abortions and securing one will increase more deaths and health issues for woman. It is interesting that one of the reason for starting this country was for religious freedoms. However it appears that we have qualified that as well as cultural differences. It is simple wrong to make this decision for woman and men who for a variety of reason feel this is an option that they choose. It should be left to them and their God whatever they practice. Calling this special session is a demonstration of the current administration pushing her agenda regardless of what the folks in Iowa want. All the polls show that Iowans do not support this legislation. This is another attempt to gain more power.Please vote no like Iowans want.
07-10-2023
Medea Saunders []
CON
This is harmful to women. It is bad science. This creates barriers for providers and patients who need care.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Most women with unintended pregnancies choose life. This bill takes that choice from ALL of them. AND, will impact attachment causing damaging effects on the mental health of these babies and generations to come. We can all agree that decreasing abortions is a good goal. There are MANY ways to reach that goal without taking away a woman's self determination. Babies have a right for their mom's to be allowed to choose them.
07-10-2023
Teresa Miller [N/A]
CON
Like the majority of Iowans, I support women being able to work with their healthcare provider without the tyranny of the state and law superseding individual rights., I will not stand for the attacks on womens freedoms and bodily autonomy as proposed in this bill.
07-10-2023
Shawna Walker [Self]
CON
The government made up of old white men, as well as a governor who has made it EXTREMELY clear that she does not support WOMEN, CHILDREN, EDUCATION, MENTAL HEALTH, ETC., do not have the right to tell me what I must do/can't do with my own body.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
Are you passing massive education and Healthcare bills to help care for these children you're forcing to be born?
07-10-2023
Doug W Bermingham [Middle River Psychology Services PLC]
CON
I am firmly against any laws banning or outlawing abortion in Iowa. We as citizens have the right to decide for ourselves what is and isn't appropriate for our own bodies and families, not have a onesided bill that bans a medical procedure across the board for all Iowans. This is against religious liberty and against any premise of individual autonomy.
07-10-2023
Kelcey Patrick-Ferree []
CON
I prize my liberty.Chief Justice Cady understood liberty."Autonomy and dominion over ones body go to the very heart of what it means to be free. At stake in this case is the right to shape, for oneself, without unwarranted governmental intrusion, ones own identity, destiny, and place in the world. Nothing could be more fundamental to the notion of liberty." Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Reynolds ex rel. State, 915 N.W.2d 206 (Iowa 2018).Nothing. There is nothing in the world that is more fundamental to liberty than bodily autonomy and dominion over one's body. We recognize this when we recognize the right of a person not to be touched without permission (Iowa Code 708.1(2)(a)). We recognize this when we recognize the right of a person not to be confined against their will (Iowa Code 710.1). We recognize this when we recognize the right of a person to decide what will happen to their corpseeven if that corpse's organs could be used to keep another person alive (Iowa Code 142C.3(4)(d)).What the Iowa Legislature proposes at present is to take away the right of half of all Iowans to dominion and autonomy over our bodies.If this bill passes, we will not be able to decide not to be touched for 40 weeks. People already, for some reason, feel free to touch pregnant bellies any time they want to. This bill goes farther: it instates a legal requirement to subject oneself to a medically unnecessary transvaginal ultrasound in order to get medical care. In any other circumstance, vaginal penetration of a person who does not want to be penetrated would be called what it is: rape. I invite any supporter of this bill who has not had a transvaginal ultrasound to try it out and see if, after the experience, you believe this is not a problem. If you do not have a vagina, other avenues are available.I have three children, so I know how much touching is involved in pregnancy care: probing and pushing, measuring everything, vaginal exams, IVs, vaccinations and blood draws, monitors strapped to the belly, catheters, needles in the spine. Some of these "touches" are painful, some are dangerous (to say nothing of the birthing process itself). Imagine every single one of those touches and prods and needles being unwanted but unavoidable. And those are just the unwanted touch elementsthere are many, many other indignities of pregnancy that no person should be forced to endure against their will. Not one.If this bill passes, we will not be able to decide to avoid the confinement of pregnancy for 40 weeks. I have endured early labor, BraxtonHicks contractions, bed rest, muscle cramps so severe that I could not walk, the ungainliness of a pregnant body, the inability to tie my own shoes. I have affirmatively decided to accept this confinement each time I went through it, and my pregnancies were relatively easy. Imagine every indignity, every physical limitation, every severe pain, every lifelong effect of pregnancy being unwanted and unavoidable.If this bill passes, we will not be able to decide whether or not our organs will be used to support another life. We will have fewer rights than a corpse. Imagine having fewer rights to bodily autonomy and dominion over one's body than a corpse.Imagine, as Justice Waterman wrote, believing "that trash set out in a garbage can for collection is entitled to more protection than a womans interest in autonomy and dominion over her own body." Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc. v. Reynolds ex rel. State, No. 222036 (Iowa 2023).I prize my liberty. The question Tuesday is, does the state legislature of Iowa prize our liberty, or does it want to give Iowans fewer rights to our own bodies than to a corpse or garbage left for collection?
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I wish to keep healthcare decisions between a patient and their doctor, without interference or influence from government.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I wish to keep healthcare decisions between a patient and their doctor, without interference or influence from government.
07-10-2023
Frank Walls []
CON
it should be an inherent right for a woman to have an abortion at least prior to 20 weeks for any reason and after if her life is threatened. this is preposterous. a 6 week old fetus is not a person
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Resident of the state of Iowa]
CON
I do not agree with this special session or taking the healthcare rights away from women in the state of Iowa. In my opinion the state of Iowa has regressed in its livability standard and it is an embarrassment to me.
07-10-2023
David Miller []
CON
I am against further abortion restrictions.
07-10-2023
Benjamin Ossman []
CON
Despite the rhetoric Governor Kim Reynolds and the GOP publicly spout that they are "for" the protection of children and the preservation of life, and small government, their policies much like the one proposed today, show they are not. Some "Prolife" policies would look like the following:public education for ALL with a scientific, and historically accurate based curriculum, including (but not limited to) physical fitness, music, and arts.access to early start programs for prek students (currently preschool is "need based" and therefore inaccessable to some).free instate tuition for state Universities and colleges.accessible and affordable healthcare for all.expanding WIC and food stamps.mandated parental pregnancy leave.protections for parents who may have to miss work to take care of a sick child.fact based reproduction education.any kind of plan for sheltering the homeless that doesn't involve prison for being homeless.accessable and affordable/free secular detox programs.a way to stabilize the housing market so citizens wouldn't be one paycheck away from eviction.some kind of legislation to prevent ridiculous rent increases at the hands of greedly landlords.supporting an increase in the minimum wage.The list is endless. Instead, they wage a culture war by denying access to school locker rooms, restrooms & sports for trans students and requiring teachers to report to a student's parents if they request to use pronouns not matching their assignedatbirth gender potential endangering the child's life. If the child isn't out at home, they do not feel safe, there may be reasons for that... Kim Reynolds and the GOP do not care about life. They care about the preservation of their Christian nationalist ideals in a country based on religious freedom, example being the 1st Ammendment. We are not a Christian nation, stop forcing it down peoples' throats.The GOP seems to care about upholding a system that gave them access to power while allowing them to continue to oppress others. Kim Reynolds chooses to wield her power over others by holding special sessions such as this because left to a ballot, Iowans would uphold access to abortions, period.Antiabortion laws give government too much power over an individual's body and their choice. It gives the government too much say in an individual's medical decisions. It gives the government too much power, and that should scare the party of small government, but that only seems to come into play when they are not getting their way.for a group claiming to be "prolife", you should believe that all lives matter, but your policies lead to increased rates of youth suicides, unsafe abortions, and women dyeing.
07-10-2023
Kelly [Taylor]
CON
The State is inserting itself in womens lives where it does not belong. Womens healthcare is between a woman and her doctors not the government. Kim Reynolds cuts SNAP and childcare monies and says shes pro life. She is only pro birth. Once the child is born the republicans in Iowa do not care for the child.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am strongly opposed to legislating bodily autonomy away from women. No one makes the choice to get an abortion lightly. It doesn't need to be even more difficult for the individuals actually involved.
07-10-2023
Kathryn Kueter [None]
PRO
Please protect every Iowan, we should not discriminate on life based on location whether inside or outside the womb. At 9 weeks gestation I could clearly see my babys heart beating and his little arms and legs moving. The radiology report said live fetus or live baby. No one should be able to take that life. In Iowa let us protect the most innocent and vulnerable among us.
07-10-2023
Mary Braunger []
CON
Keep you politics out of my healthcare business!
07-10-2023
Helena Turner []
CON
I urge you to set aside ideas of morals or religious positions & focus instead on the thousands upon thousands of parents and families forced to make excruciating decisions about whether and how best to grow, sustain, nurture, and support their families. You have the opportunity to be on the right side of history, here to trust your constituents to make decisions which principally affect THEIR lives (not yours). I dont like the idea of guns in homes so i do not have a gun in my home. If you dont like the idea of pregnancy termination, carry your own to term.Sincerely, Helena Turner, APRN
07-10-2023
N. Bruce Nelson [Elder, Community of Christ, Bloomington Branch, Lamoni, Iowa]
CON
The decisions regarding abortion are a medical issue that should be between the physicians and their patient. They should be able to come to the best possible decision for all concerned based on the best medical information.The State has no standing nor expertise to impose rules that polling shows are opposed by a majority of Iowans. This overreach should be recognized for what it is and be quickly dismissed as a basic threat to our democracy.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [private citizen]
CON
Healthcare, including abortion and contraception, is a private matter between patients and doctors and is vital to keep safe and legal. This bill is contrary to medical science and creates increased confusion and risks in an atmosphere of rising maternal mortality, as has been seen in other states that have similarly restricted abortion.
07-10-2023
Rev. Brett Witmer [Bethel Lutheran Church]
PRO
This legislation should be passed for the good of the state of Iowa. All legislation is a question of morality. And hard cases make bad law, you dont legislate based on the most extreme scenarios. You cannot escape legislating morality. And so the only question is, whose morality are you going to legislate? In an era where we are so concerned about fighting hate, why not protect the one group that is most vulnerable to malice the unborn. Why not protect and encourage people to see and uphold the value of it. Encourage a more caring society by protecting those who have no advocates children in the womb. By protecting life we push for a society that cares for one another and stops the murder of the most innocent human beings among us. By allowing the evil of abortion to continue, we reinforce the message that there are some human beings that it is okay to kill and dispose of. We have no right judge the value of human life, to judge whether it is wanted or unwanted. In the end, God will judge us for how we treat the littlest people among us.
07-10-2023
George A Herman []
CON
Our legislators neither have the right nor the knowledge to make reproductive decisions for the woman of Iowa. That right belongs to the pregnant woman and her medical provider, exclusively. Iowa currently has guide lines already in place for abortions, allowing a woman and her medical provider to make sound decisions about the possibility to terminate a pregnancy, up to 20 weeks. There are many scenarios that could lead to the need to terminate a pregnancy well beyond the proposed 6 week limit. That decision should be left to the pregnant woman and her medical provider. Please vote NO on any legislation the impedes a woman's right to make her own decision on her pregnancy.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Abortion is a PRIVATE healthcare decision between a person and their healthcare provider. Iowan's healthcare should be private and not interfered with by the government. Privacy is a fundamental right to a person's life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness and was specifically contemplated by the Founding Fathers.
07-10-2023
Jennifer Horner [Planned Parenthood North Central States]
CON
This would be a blow to the state of Iowa in so many ways...If you are going to force pregnancystatemandated pregnancyat the VERY LEAST, fund prenatal and maternal health...Where is that emergency extra funding? Where is the special session for that. If this bill is passed...with no other complementary funding for the extra pregnancies and births, then that is just inhumaneNOT prolife.
07-10-2023
Hope Johnson []
CON
No. The state government should not be making medical decisions for my daughters based on religious beliefs for a small segment of Iowans. We are women of faith as well. Eliminating safe, wellestablished medical options for my daughters violates our religious freedom.
07-10-2023
Jordan True []
CON
The correlation between restrictive abortion laws and adverse health outcomes for mothers and children, particularly those from marginalized communities, is deeply concerning. These laws disproportionately impact individuals with low incomes, often forcing them to carry unwanted pregnancies to term without adequate support systems in place. The lack of access to healthcare, financial assistance, and social supports in these states poses significant risks to the safety and wellbeing of pregnant individuals and their children. It is crucial that we prioritize comprehensive support systems and policies that ensure the health and wellbeing of families and children. I urge you to reconsider the implications of restrictive abortion laws and work towards creating a more inclusive and supportive environment for all.
07-10-2023
Alex Haats []
CON
This bill and bills like it that restrict access to medical care will cost human lives with their ridiculous insistence that a potential of a new life should be granted rights over the mother.
07-10-2023
Ellen Wrede []
CON
Iowans have made it clear, as well as the Iowa Supreme Court, that we as a state, society, and democracy value access to legal abortions. Calling a special session to go around public AND court opinion is despicable, immoral, and a political show of what small and power hungry individuals are running our state. I'm ashamed to be an Iowan during a time when the majority party in our state is so deeply concerned with moralistic regulation as to take food, shelter, healthcare, and safety away from the most vulnerable among us.
07-10-2023
Maggie Douglas []
CON
Abortion is healthcare. It is a personal and extremely difficult decision to be made with a doctor. Government officials have no place in this decision. Personally, I hope to be blessed with children in the future and recognize the sanctity of life, but I am afraid this bill could put my life at risk if I am not able to get appropriate healthcare during pregnancy.Women deserve to be in charge when it comes to the biggest lifechanging decision in their life.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I want to keep HEALTHCARE, including abortion and contraception, safe and legal in the state of Iowa. These restrictions can have serious and fatal results for people, as seen in other states that passed similar restrictions.
07-10-2023
JoAnn Hardy []
CON
Stop treating women like second class citizens who dont know whats best for themselves and their families. This is a deeply personal decision. Politicians need to stay out of it. Bills like this cause doctors to hesitate to treat women because of your threats to punish them. Its clear from the bills republicans have been passing that dont cherish children, you want to control women.
07-10-2023
Sarah Meyers []
CON
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed legislation that seeks to ban abortions after a fetal heartbeat can be detected. Such a ban would have severe consequences on women's health, autonomy, and personal freedom.First and foremost, it is crucial to recognize that reproductive choice is a fundamental human right. Women should have the right to make decisions about their bodies and their pregnancies, in consultation with their healthcare providers and based on their unique circumstances. Banning abortions after the detection of a fetal heartbeat effectively takes away this right and places undue burdens on women who may be facing challenging situations.It is important to note that the detection of a fetal heartbeat does not necessarily indicate viability or a healthy pregnancy. Many pregnancies end in miscarriage, and the detection of a fetal heartbeat at an early stage does not guarantee a successful outcome. Women should have the option to make informed decisions about their pregnancies based on medical advice and their personal circumstances, rather than being subjected to restrictive laws that ignore the complexities of individual cases.Furthermore, such a ban disproportionately affects women in vulnerable situations, including those facing medical complications, survivors of rape or incest, and those with limited financial resources. These women are the ones who often bear the brunt of restrictive abortion laws, as they may face increased difficulties in accessing safe and legal abortion services. Banning abortions after a fetal heartbeat can perpetuate inequality and further marginalize those who are already facing numerous challenges.Additionally, it is worth considering the potential consequences of such a ban on public health. History has shown us that restrictive abortion laws do not eliminate abortions but rather drive them underground, where they become unsafe and potentially lifethreatening. When women do not have access to safe and legal abortion services, they may resort to dangerous methods that jeopardize their health and wellbeing. Lawmakers must prioritize public health and ensure that women have access to comprehensive reproductive healthcare services, including safe and legal abortions.I urge you to reconsider supporting this proposed legislation and instead focus on policies that promote comprehensive sex education, access to contraceptives, and support for women in all stages of their reproductive lives. By investing in preventive measures and providing support to women and families, we can reduce the need for abortions and create a society that values reproductive autonomy while ensuring the wellbeing of all its citizens.Thank you for your time and consideration. I implore you to stand up for the rights of women and oppose the ban on abortions after the detection of a fetal heartbeat. Together, we can foster a society that respects individual choices and upholds the principles of personal freedom and bodily autonomy.
07-10-2023
Jodine Gunn [Private Citizen]
CON
Many who will be directly impacted are on Medicaid. Iowa currently has very limited access to Prenatal and OB care for that population. The result will be women presenting to local Emergency centers in labor and babies born with complications due to lack of prenatal care. And we havent even addressed the Foster system. If babies have the right to be born, we must also take responsibility for their wellbeing. We must focus on services before taking this premature action.
07-10-2023
Kelcey Patrick-Ferree []
CON
I prize my liberty.Chief Justice Cady understood liberty."Autonomy and dominion over ones body go to the very heart of what it means to be free. At stake in this case is the right to shape, for oneself, without unwarranted governmental intrusion, ones own identity, destiny, and place in the world. Nothing could be more fundamental to the notion of liberty." Planned Parenthood of the Heartland v. Reynolds ex rel. State, 915 N.W.2d 206 (Iowa 2018).Nothing. There is nothing in the world that is more fundamental to liberty than bodily autonomy and dominion over one's body. We recognize this when we recognize the right of a person not to be touched without permission (Iowa Code 708.1(2)(a)). We recognize this when we recognize the right of a person not to be confined against their will (Iowa Code 710.1). We recognize this when we recognize the right of a person to decide what will happen to their corpseeven if that corpse's organs could be used to keep another person alive (Iowa Code 142C.3(4)(d)).What the Iowa Legislature proposes at present is to take away the right of half of all Iowans to dominion and autonomy over our bodies.If this bill passes, we will not be able to decide not to be touched for 40 weeks. People already, for some reason, feel free to touch pregnant bellies any time they want to. This bill goes farther: it instates a legal requirement to subject oneself to a medically unnecessary transvaginal ultrasound in order to get medical care. In any other circumstance, vaginal penetration of a person who does not want to be penetrated would be called what it is: rape. I invite any supporter of this bill who has not had a transvaginal ultrasound to try it out and see if, after the experience, you believe this is not a problem. If you do not have a vagina, other avenues are available.I have three children, so I know how much touching is involved in pregnancy care: probing and pushing, measuring everything, vaginal exams, IVs, vaccinations and blood draws, monitors strapped to the belly, catheters, needles in the spine. Some of these "touches" are painful, some are dangerous (to say nothing of the birthing process itself). Imagine every single one of those touches and prods and needles being unwanted but unavoidable. And those are just the unwanted touch elementsthere are many, many other indignities of pregnancy that no person should be forced to endure against their will. Not one.If this bill passes, we will not be able to decide to avoid the confinement of pregnancy for 40 weeks. I have endured early labor, BraxtonHicks contractions, bed rest, muscle cramps so severe that I could not walk, the ungainliness of a pregnant body, the inability to tie my own shoes. I have affirmatively decided to accept this confinement each time I went through it, and my pregnancies were relatively easy. Imagine every indignity, every physical limitation, every severe pain, every lifelong effect of pregnancy being unwanted and unavoidable.If this bill passes, we will not be able to decide whether or not our organs will be used to support another life. We will have fewer rights than a corpse. Imagine having fewer rights to bodily autonomy and dominion over one's body than a corpse.Imagine, as Justice Waterman wrote, believing "that trash set out in a garbage can for collection is entitled to more protection than a womans interest in autonomy and dominion over her own body." Planned Parenthood of the Heartland, Inc. v. Reynolds ex rel. State, No. 222036 (Iowa 2023).I prize my liberty. The question Tuesday is, does the state legislature of Iowa prize our liberty, or does it want to give Iowans fewer rights to our own bodies than to a corpse or garbage left for collection?
07-10-2023
Jon Harcey []
CON
This bill represents an overreach of the purpose of government. Reproductive rights are a personal medical decision and lawmakers have no right to intervene. Please vote no to this bill.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This bill directly threatens the bodily sovereignty of all Iowan women and is an active attempt to limit the freedoms of American citizens. This bill will not protect children and until Iowans fund public schools and support actual alive children in need this bill is nothing but a direct attack on Iowa's women.
07-10-2023
Hope Bibens []
CON
This is not what the majority of Iowans want. We should have the right to reproductive freedom. Keep abortion safe and legal in Iowa!
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Dear Iowa Legislators,My family has lived IA for generations and comes from a background of family farmers and small business owners. My family values say that we should keep our noses out of other people's personal business and let them make their own decisions, especially around family and financial matters such as when to have children. Abortion is one such decision that I believe should be left up to the family, not the government. Restricting abortion to this degree, to a time before most people know they're pregnant, would effectively remove a family's ability to make their own decisions.Thank you for reading,Audrey
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
People have the right to choose how they want to live and to force them to carry a fetus to term even if 1)they are emotionally or financially not ready to have kids, 2) find out they are carrying a nonviable fetus, 3) have suffered a trauma that has left them pregnant, 4) had contraception fail, or 5) just don't want kids, is cruel and the opposite of compassionate. Let people have their bodily autonomy and choose how they want to live their lives.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
As an Iowa voter, I want to keep healthcare including abortion legal and a decision between a person/woman and their DOCTOR, not legislated by these state or any other government entity. This is unconditional and the only criminal act that the state should be concerned about is the blatant waste of taxpayer money to call this special session. Politicians are not doctors. Stop enacting laws over bodies and personal healthcare.
07-10-2023
Diettra Dancing [N/A]
CON
Freedom, a concept dear to our hearts in America, is expressed and experienced most personally as individuals as the right to do as we please with our own bodies. Regardless of what a fetus may become when it has been born and is set free from it's mother's body, while it remains there it is part of her body. Allowing any other person or state government to make choices about how she cares for her body, is the antithesis of freedom. A person and their doctor are the only people who righteously carry the responsibility of those decisions. If we, as a State, remove that right and responsibility from any human, we are removing their freedom at the most fundamental level. This is unconstitutional in the United States of America. We cannot ban this medical procedure in Iowa. If we do, we deny that women are free humans in this state.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/a]
CON
As a woman of childbearing age, I want my reproductive rights protected. I recently suffered a traumatic miscarriage from a very wanted pregnancy. I dont want my medical options impacted and my health hurt further by the law. I want my doctors to have the ability to make the best decisions for my health. I took Mifeprex and Misoprostol to speed up my miscarriage and prevent blood loss. I want these drugs available for people in my situation. I worry that restricting abortion will restrict healthcare access and reduce positive outcomes for people like me.
07-10-2023
Jack triplett []
CON
I am strongly against this bill. Mainly because the value of the woman greatly exceeds that of a fetus. At this stage in life it cannot survive outside of the womb, and its presence can cause so many health concerns for the woman that can be fatal that its continued existance is not as important as the woman's.I have many friends and my wife included that a pregnancy can be fatal to them. They take all the precautions necessary to protect themselves and there are situations that can happen that are completely out of their control.4 of my friends have been assaulted by men and ended up pregnant by their attacker. The number of women I know who were assaulted and didn't get pregnant is much higher. These were situations out of their control completely. The world we live in is a dark place where these things happen daily and we do not need to make it darker by taking away yet another choice from people especially when they didn't have one to begin with.
07-10-2023
Henry Hahn [Personal]
CON
This bill is just wrong. Most people in Iowa don't even want abortions banned, this is literally just a partisancharged movement to push an agenda voters don't even want.
07-10-2023
Whitney Mixdorf [Mixdorf for Iowa]
CON
Is this freedom?Gov. Kim Reynolds has called a special session of the Iowa legislature for the sole purpose of banning abortion at six weeks. Most women dont even know they are pregnant before six weeks! Iowa will soon have one of the nations most extreme laws controlling our reproductive freedom.Iowa women will no longer be able to decide what is best for their health, family, or future. Imagine that the inability to decide your own medical care. During the pandemic we learned that a large percentage of our population cares deeply about their medical freedom. And yet here we are, only a few years later, watching as medical freedom is stripped away from half of the people in this state. If we want to prevent abortion then we need to do all we can to prevent unintended pregnancies. We need to make sure everyone has guaranteed access to contraceptives and proper medical care, to expand sex ed and family planning services, and to provide real support and affordable options to mothers and young families. The moderates on both sides of the aisle need to speak up and get involved in our politics. This law is too extreme for Iowa!
07-10-2023
Beth Allin []
CON
There is absolutely no place for government in healthcare decisions. The government should not be able to dictate reproductive care for women in the state of Iowa. I am strongly opposed to this bill.
07-10-2023
Kathryn Miller [none]
CON
I am opposed to any additional bans on reproductive freedom.
07-10-2023
Kerry George []
CON
Please continue to allow women and their health care providers to make the difficult decisions regarding their reproductive health. Rather it would be far more productive to work on the issues which result in placing women in these difficult circumstances. Regulate Dick, not Jane!We can all work together to on solutions which will make abortion a much less frequent choice when women have options to prevent pregnancy when it is not wanted.
07-10-2023
Sarah Cramer []
CON
Due to abortion laws in Iowa I was forced to carry a terminally ill fetus for 8 month and 3 weeks. Every day I woke up wondering if that was the day my fetus would die. Every night I wondered if it would die in the night. I suffered extreme depression and anxiety. My relationship with my husband and young daughter changed for ever. I am still not the same person. Im more bitter and negative. I was continuously asked if I was excited and ready for our baby and I had to tell them that my baby would never live outside of my womb, that unlike other happy women in their third trimester that I didnt have a nursery set up and was not looking forward to his birth because that would mean he would be dead. We badly wanted that baby boy. The mental and physical trauma suffered those long months could have been avoided if I had the option to abort the fetus. PLEASE vote to take care of women and their rights to do what is best for their bodies and their families!!!
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Individual]
CON
I want to keep all healthcare, including abortion and contraception, safe and legal in the state of Iowa. I support a women's right to choose, and that this issue should be a private matter between her and her healthcare provider. Abortion restrictions in other states have had serious and fatal results for women.
07-10-2023
Shannon Crummy-Tinsley [Service Corporation International]
CON
I hope women choose something besides abortion, but the government certainly isnt going to make that choice for the people. If you want to work on new laws and preventing abortions, why not target the root of the problem rather than the result? I recommend revisiting rape and sexual assault laws and punishments which are a laughable slap on the wrist for the lifelong trauma it causes the victim. Much more trauma than politicians worrying about unborn babies. Protect our women and children from sex trafficking, rape, incest, etc. And youll have achieved a true victory.
07-10-2023
Valerie Earnest [Private citizen]
CON
This bill will not stop abortions. It will increase maternal death and injuries as those with a medical need for a miscarriage D&C or pregnancy termination due to other lifeendangering conditions will not be able to receive the medical care they need, while those seeking elective abortion will just go elsewhere or receive unsafe care. While I am personally antiabortion, I believe any bill without caveats in place to protect rape and incest victims and those with medical emergencies is reckless and truly cruel in nature.
07-10-2023
Marissa Flugum []
CON
Please let women and their healthcare providers be allowed to make their own decisions when it comes to diagnosis and treatment. I was able to have IVF treatment when building my family. Abortion bans will infringe on IVF treatments when it comes to frozen embryos and storage of embryos. Also, I nearly died when a pregnancy blew up because of HELLP syndrome. Im afraid that abortion bans would lead to complicating medical treatment of such issues as HELLP, placenta previa, placental abruption, ectopic pregnancy, molar pregnancy, preeclampsia, uterine rupture; just to name a few. Please vote NO. Let women be free to seek treatment for any and all health issues.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Please vote no. Please do not pass ANY ban on abortion. To deny safe, legal abortionAND TO PLACE EXTREME LIMITS ON ITdiscounts the human beings who are alive in Iowa right now. Women, men, CHILDREN. Families make decisions based on what is best for them, women suffer from pregnancy complications that can lead to mental health damage, kids suffer if they lose a parent or if their situation gets worse. If life is so important then the focus should be on how to keep adults and children and families in Iowa safe and healthy NOW. People know what is best for their families, themselves. Any ban on abortion is taking away valuable and life saving healthcare from all Humans who are alive right now and need it most.
07-10-2023
Annie Tekippe []
CON
Iowans have a right to safe and legal abortion. I do not support this bill.
07-10-2023
Frank Kminek [None]
CON
I wish to communicate my opposition to any attempt to criminalize abortion services in Iowa.
07-10-2023
Abbey Droz []
CON
I am registering my opposition (con) regarding HSB 255. As an Iowan, born and raised, the state should not be involved in restricting health decisions I make under the expert guidance of my medical practitioner. The women's health options that would be prohibited under HSB 255 are important options for not only women's bodily autonomy, but also lifesaving measures in some circumstances. HSB 255 has no place in Iowa.
07-10-2023
Leslie K Wilson []
CON
This bill will harm women and imposes government between a patient and her doctor. While the antiabortion group believes otherwise, these are very difficult decisions for women and only women with their doctors should be making the decisions. I have tow daughters who are ER nurses in states where these laws have passed. They have already seen first hand the negative consequences for women who cannot get a needed abortion. Please, get your hands off women's bodies.
07-10-2023
Amy Edmonds [None]
CON
It has been proven time and again that abortion bans will do nothing to prevent abortions. What it will do is endanger the lives of women. Please take some time to look at the outcome from states who have enacted similar bans.When I moved to Iowa, it was one of the top states for education. We were Iowa nice, and it was a place to grow. We were one of the first states that allowed gay marriage. People wanted to raise their families here. With this most recent session in our statehouse, I've been very disheartened to see our public education system further dismantled, people's rights being systematically stripped away, to further the wishes of a minority of people in the state. I see Iowa catering to the whims of a radical right wing, and I don't recognize what our state has become. Under the leadership of Kim Reynolds, our state has moved backwards. The house under her reign has very often voted against the wishes of the majority of Iowans. The Iowa supreme court ruled against this law, and now our governor is so determined to strip rights from Iowa women that she will waste money calling in a special session. Why the hurry to push this bill through? It's because you and she know that it is unpopular.All I ask is that our lawmakers begin to remember that you work for all of us. Take time to listen to your constituents, take time to think about the implications of this law you are considering, and vote no.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am against further restrictions on abortion. No more coat hangers. Keep abortion safe and legal.
Attachment
07-10-2023
Carol Petersen [None]
CON
As an Iowan, I am very upset by the abortion law set to be passed in the special session on Tuesday. This opinion piece by Todd Dorman of The Gazette in Cedar Rapids does a great job of summing up my feelings: https://www.thegazette.com/staffcolumnists/specialsessionwillbeespeciallyharmfultoiowa/ But what is most upsetting to me is that the law will force a 9 or 10 year old victim of incest to have to carry the child to term, like what happened in Ohio. Even though the law states there is an exception for this, the rape or incest must be reported. A 9 year victim of incest will not be able to report the incest by six weeks of gestation, if at all. Most rapes are not reported for many reasons. If nothing else can be done, can you propose an amendment to the law so that an exception can be made for rape and incest up to 20 weeks or longer? I would also like you to propose many amendments to this law including: providing or expanding prenatal care,providing a very detailed description as to what qualifies as an abortion for the health of the mother, (i.e. does she need to be practically dead before one is allowed?)providing adequate access to affordable child care,forcing the fathers to pay for prenatal care and child support,adequately fund our mental health system,make it easier, not harder to qualify for SNAP food assistance and Medicaid,raise the minimum wage rate in Iowa,and provide for sensible gun laws so guns cease to be the number one killer of children. As law makers, please include any other amendments that make sense to make the burden for these mothers and children who will be born due to the passing of this law. If the Republicans in the Iowa legislature vote down all of these amendments, then it will be blatantly obvious to any fair minded observer that this is not a crusade for life, but rather an effort to exert government power over women and their bodies. Shame on Governor Reynolds and Iowa Republican legislators for putting the health of Iowa women at risk with this law. Please reconsider the passage of this draconian abortion law and your assault on the lives and freedoms of Iowa women.
07-10-2023
Mary [Darrow]
CON
Governor Reynolds,STOP wasting Iowa taxpayer funds for political grandstanding to advance your political career. Women of Iowa do not need to be regulated and controlled by your oppressive efforts. Let women make decisions about their healthcare options with their doctor. Government should not dictate these decisions for women.We see you and know what you are up to.It's all about you...Mary Darrow
07-10-2023
Olivia Dotson [Student Advocates for Planned Parenthood]
CON
this bill is a disgrace and a violation of basic human rights.
07-10-2023
Tori Barnes-Brus []
CON
I urge you to be brave and show respect for ALL Iowans, especially women and children, by voting AGAINST HSB 255 during the special session. Passage of this bill means that women and pregnant people will lose the right to make reproductive decisions about their own bodies. It takes away autonomy and limits individuals' rights. This bill does not take into consideration women and pregnant people's personal lives, histories, and abilities. Each person should decide what happens to their own body and how to proceed in the case of pregnancy. It is NOT up to the government to force people into pregnancy, birth, and childrearing all acts that are potentially life threatening.This is a health issue and a mental health issue.Further, it limits the authority of medical doctors as they will be placed in extraordinary circumstances which will require them to prioritize their medical licenses over the best interests of their patients. This is unacceptable!!!Passage of this bill is going to result in physical harm for pregnant and potentially pregnant people and further suffering by so many Iowans.Do the right thing and end the assault on women and children by voting against this bill.
07-10-2023
Erin Owen []
CON
This hasty action to ban abortion in Iowa is infuriating. It seems one side is determined to win no matter the cost. Pregnancy dramatically changes lives, and government has no role in Iowans' medical decisions. Abortion access affects our freedom, livelihood and pursuit of happiness. Forcing people to give birth oversteps the role of government. No one path is right for everyone. We need to be able to choose how and if our families grow. We need access to safe, legal abortion.
07-10-2023
Robert Larson []
CON
I am against HSB 255 and I believe its a mistake and a misrepresentation of Iowa to think that the government should make decisions for women and mothers against their will. Its grossly inappropriate to force this upon people due to religious beliefs of others when we supposedly have freedom of religion and separation of church and state. The absolute foul odor coming out of our state right now due to our politicians should bring shame to all Iowans.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Abortion care is too complex to be legislated. A pregnant person's healthcare needs to be between them and their doctors. And speaking of doctors, if Iowa passes this abortion ban, we will see fewer obgyns in our state, which will hurt us ALL!
07-10-2023
Maggie T. []
CON
Those with uteruses need to have a choice, when it comes to their reproductive health! Im currently childless by choice and this bill would infringe on my future, if I were to get raped or if it restricts my access to birth control. I think about my four nieces, all under the age of 18. Are we going to force the preteens and teenagers of this state to carry babies, when they are not even old enough to drive?! Vote NO, for the future of Iowa!
07-10-2023
Evy Raes []
CON
This is a travesty. Ive heard so many statements of freedom and liberty from our governor. It is clear that these system only apply to those who look like her, believe like her, and who voted for her. Women should be the only people who make decisions about their own bodies. Prolife has come to mean pro fetus not pro life, as social safety net programs have been cut or defunded in Iowa. Trust women. Leave your religious beliefs at the church door.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
A bill DICTATING that women can no longer receive an abortion at 6 weeks, when many dont know they are pregnant, is overreach of the government by telling women what they cant do for their medical concerns. No women takes abortion lightly, but sometimes it is necessary for their mental and physical health. The so called heartbeat is not due to a heart beating. Its a cluster of cells with an electrical impulse at this time in development. Sometimes a physical abnormality that points to lack of ability to survive outside the uterus is discovered well beyond the 6 weeks in fetuss development. Insisting that a woman carry such a fetus to term is not only mental torture, but physically endangering the life of the mother. Who will OK when such an abortion is needed if life of the mother is included in the bill? The Iowa Supreme Court? The legislature? How long will her doctor need to wait for the OK?I urge you to keep the safety of legal abortions at 20 weeks.
07-10-2023
Mark Dorhout [Iowa voter]
CON
After having read the bill, and the current law, and having conversations with my family, of which three are potential childbearing women, I encourage you to vote against the proposed bill. As you decide, please do what I did, and pay special attention to the young women in Iowa. They are the most affected, and from my discussions, they are opposed to this new bill.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
Its okay for you to disagree with getting an abortion just like its okay for me to agree with getting an abortion. In this country, we can make our own choices and to take away the choice of an abortion from a woman cannot be tolerated. If you dont believe in abortions then dont get one. Thats your choice. We are hurting those people with uteruses and babies further if we ban abortions.
07-10-2023
Karin Derry []
CON
Chief Justice Mark Cady was right "autonomy and dominion over ones body go to the very heart of what it means to be free." Please allow Iowa women the freedom to make their own personal healthcare decisions and vote no on this bill.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The concept of a "fetal heartbeat" at this stage of pregnancy is inaccurate and not indicative of viability. At this early stage, the signal detected is a group of cells that are initiating electrical activity. It is not detecting a functional cardiovascular system or functional heart. The "heartbeat" sound heard from a fetus at this stage is generated from the ultrasound machine. Additionally, at 6 weeks, the cells are still considered an embyro, not a fetus. This bill is erroneous from the start, and should not be used to prohibit medical procedures. The terms in this proposed bill are medically inaccurate, are not clinical terms, and are being used intentionally to sway decision makers and voters. Finally, even with correct language, these decisions should be between the patient and their medical provider, and should not involve the opinions of legislators without medical degrees or the understanding of each individual circumstance.Thank you.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The decisions regarding abortion are a medical issue that should be between the physicians and their patient. They should be able to come to the best possible decision for all concerned based on the best medical information.The State has no standing nor expertise to impose rules that polling shows are opposed by a majority of Iowans. This overreach should be recognized for what it is and be quickly dismissed as a basic threat to our democracy.
07-10-2023
Ron Stuart []
CON
A large majority of Iowans and I support reproductive freedom and demand that the state stay out of our personal health care decisions.This very definitely includes our right to make personal decisions about reproductive care and abortions! This proposed law is nothing more than an attempt to politically intrude into our private, personal health care and must be rejected.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Iowa resident]
CON
Sixtyone percent of Iowa adults say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while 35% say the procedure should be illegal in most or all cases. More than twothirds of Iowa women, 70%, say abortion should be legal in most or all cases. Democrats also are broadly in favor, with 87% favoring legal abortion. Likewise, 72% of Iowans under age 35 and 70% of city dwellers also say abortion should be legal in all or most cases. The poll of 805 Iowa adults was conducted March 58 by Selzer & Co. of Des Moines. It has a margin of error of plus or minus 3.5 percentage points.Source: https://www.desmoinesregister.com/story/news/politics/iowapoll/2023/03/27/iowapollmostiowansbacklegalabortionasiowasupremecourtmullslimitsroevwade/69990037007/
07-10-2023
Dennis Harbaugh []
CON
One of the most important rights that every individual in the U.S. enjoys is autonomy over our own physical body. Any legislation which restricts or removes that right must meet an extremely high bar. This proposed legislation would severely restrict the right of women to control their own physical body, by taking away health care decisions from them and their family and transferring that control to state government. And the 'high bar' included in this legislation leading to the loss of individual rights? Simply getting pregnant. This legislation is flawed on many levels, but the most extreme and unreasonable section is the 6 week ban, which is before many women even realize they are pregnant. I've personally known many woman who didn't discover they were pregnant until after 6 weeks. What right do state legislators have to tell women how to handle their own pregnancy at that early stage FAR ahead of fetal viability? Please vote 'no' on this extreme, unnecessary, and radical legislation.
07-10-2023
Randall Goblirsch [N/A]
CON
I am an Iowan and a mother who does not support any ban on abortion in my state. Abortion bans widen already gaping health inequities for people of color, people with disabilities, people in rural areas, young people and people with lowincomes. I want to live and raise my child in a state where medical decisions are between a patient and their doctor, not the government.
07-10-2023
Kyle Kirwan []
CON
This is ahealthcare issue between medical professionals and individuals. The state has no place in these decisions. These deeply unpopular minority bills being forced through legislation make our community worse. This is politics at its basest form and its hard to watch. Iowa was a leader in personal rights and common sense, that is being eroded day by day to please extremists.
07-10-2023
Scot Stuart []
CON
This is to loudly reject this bill and it's attempt to politicize our personal medical and reproductive decisions.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Cole Easton]
CON
Even as a Republican myself, this is batshit crazy that the party of small government is pushing this. The decisions regarding abortion are a medical issue that should be between physicians and their patients. They should be able to come to the best possible decision for all concerned based on the best medical information.The State has no standing nor expertise to impose rules that polling shows are opposed by a majority of Iowans.This overreach should be recognized for what it is and be quickly dismissed as a basic threat to our democracy. I will switch parties if this passes, my daughters will not have fewer rights than their mother and grandmother had. I can't believe we are even discussing this!
07-10-2023
Marlana Schnell []
CON
At the age of 18, I joined the military and was completing my second round of classes to become an Ocean Systems Technician. I also learned that I was pregnant. This was in the early 80s and I would have had to leave the career I was just beginning. I had no business being a parent when I couldn't even manage taking birth control on a consistent basis.I had an abortion, in Iowa. I flew home from CA so that my mom could help me through the process. It wasn't anything exceptional, but it was necessary and the best possible decision for this young, immature, sailor. I am grateful for the children that I have, that I chose to birth in my late 30s when I settled down, got married and could afford and manage their care and upbringing. Forcing women to have children when they are not prepared is barbaric, putting us back decades. The strain this would have put on my family, my own development, and God forbid the development of that unwanted fetus would have been detrimental in every way. I shudder to imagine how awful that could've been.I don't claim to have a sob story, or even an emotionally compelling reason to abort my pregnancy, it was and should remain a choice for women that do not want to give birth for whatever reason they choose. Why the government thinks it necessary to interfere and force a woman to give birth is beyond my understanding. It's none of your business why we make these decisions. If you have ever prayed to God to help you through a horrible mistake,you know the struggle of an unwanted pregnancy. You also know it should not be judged by some human holding a Bible, it is a decision for that woman, her doctor and her belief system. You have no right to control a woman's body or choice.
07-10-2023
Hannah Wolos []
CON
Every person deserves the right to bodily autonomy. These are decisions that should be made with medical professionals, not politicians.
07-10-2023
Lori Ziegenhorn [American Association of Physician Assistents]
CON
As a health care provider, I have seen the harmful effects to children, women and families who have not had control of their own bodies and health care. This bill will cause illegal abortions, causing deaths to unborn children, women who have infection or death from unsafe procedures and more children with disabilities. There is no follow through for women, children, girls or families for health care, financial assistance for child care to allow parents to work and provide for their enlarged families. The majority of people in IA support abortion. Please listen to the majority of us.Sincerely, Lori ZiegenhornPhysician Assistant
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
This does not represent the will of the people. You pass this, all of you will be out at the next election and then Democrats will have the same power to pass legislation without following proper channels and we will welcome it. Keep your faith out of our government.
07-10-2023
Jacki Brucher Moore []
CON
There are far too many unknown scenarios that might lead a woman to consider having an abortion. Any laws restricting her ability to thoroughly consider her options in conjunction with the medical expertise of her health care provider, is simply inhumane. The Iowa Legislature needs to focus on how to HELP people in this state live healthier, more productive lives instead of driving a dangerous and restrictive law down the throats of its people.
07-10-2023
Mary Airy []
PRO
I urge legislators to vote against this legislation. The people of Iowa are against this harmful legislation that seeks to control womens choice to give birth or not. These are personal medical decisions that individuals in consultation with the women, medical staff, and others of the womans choosing. This is not an issue that politicians should be involved in. Vote No for this repressive legislation.
07-10-2023
Rhonda Sheeley []
CON
Women need to have medical options/decisions over their bodies.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I oppose this legislation because it will not positively change anything! The right to personal autonomy should be sacred, ANY attempt to curtail or remove it puts ALL of our rights at risk!The current law is acceptable, but this change will only force women to seek unsafe alternatives and will NOT save lives as some believe.I urge the Legislature to reject this bill and work toward doing things that will actually help mothers and children!
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Healthcare should be between doctors and their patients. Most doctors are against restrictions. Listen to the professionals.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The decisions regarding abortion are a medical issue that should be between the physicians and their patient. They should be able to come to the best possible decision for all concerned based on the best medical information.The State has no standing nor expertise to impose rules that polling shows are opposed by a majority of Iowans.This overreach should be recognized for what it is and be quickly dismissed as a basic threat to our democracy.
07-10-2023
Jennifer Allen []
CON
I wholeheartedly OPPOSE HSB 255. Medical decisions belong in the hands of patients and their medical providers. The legislature has no business regulating such decisions. Full stop.
07-10-2023
Cathy Deschenes []
CON
I am strongly in favor of a woman's right to make decisions about her own body and vehemently opposed to Iowa restricting a woman's right to choose. This conviction will be an absolute decision point in the next election. Sincerely,Cathy Deschenes & Nick Pantazis
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Self]
CON
This should not be a political issue. This is a decision to be made between a woman and her doctor.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
Respectfully, the Iowa maternal mortality rate is one of the worst in the country. The last thing women, medical professionals, insurers, etc., need at this time are more barriers to providing timesensitive medical care. This sort of law doesnt stop abortion, it just makes healthcare less safe. Please keep medical decisions between people and their medical professionals, who are thoroughly versed in the impacts of such decisions on their patients. Do not bow to the pressure of politicians and lobbyists whose primary focus is earning a spot on a national stage.
07-10-2023
Sara Steuer [none]
CON
This is an attack on the basic human right to bodily autonomy, something solely to be left between a person and their medical doctor. This is not a governmental concern, Iowans are not pawns, the majority do NOT agree with this ban, they support reproductive rights. The fact that Gov. Reynolds is playing into her own agenda shows that she isn't working for Iowans, she is out for political/personal gain.Iowans demand their rights to their own bodies.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I believe all Iowans have the right to make our own decisions about our bodies, lives and futures free from government control. Iowa families not politicians should be able to decide what medical decisions are best for them.
07-10-2023
Carol Chesterman [NA]
CON
61% of Iowans believe that every Iowan has the fundamental right to make individual decisions about their reproductive health care, including birth control, abortion, and pregnancy. I urge you to support legislation that supports Iowa women's right to be in control their bodies and not give that authority to legislators. I urge you to NOT support a 6week ban on abortion. Vote NO!Respectfully, Carol Chesterman
07-10-2023
Ashley Burns [Mercy Hospital Cedar Rapids Birthplace]
CON
The choice to seek out abortion services, as with all other medical procedures far less scrutinized, should be between that patient and their physician, not the Iowa legislature. I work in labor and delivery it is my job to work with families and their babies. I get to help bring new life into the world. On many occasions, its a joyous experience. At other times, it is wrought with trauma, social issues like poverty, drugs, maternal health risk, single persons without support partners, and/or other issues. No one should be forced to follow through with a pregnancy they do not want or know is in the best interest of themselves and that fetus not to continue. It doesnt matter how wanted a fetus is birth is a traumatic experience for every single person who experiences it. This decision to birth a child or not cannot be left to our Governor and this Rep. Legislature as has been shown, they are entirely out of touch with the realities of Iowans in this state. We cant have them controlling this very private matter. Additionally, there is a very serious risk to a patients right to privacy and, as someone who works in healthcare, I know this is a critical right we take very seriously. This bill directly puts HIPAA PHI safeties at risk.
07-10-2023
Lindsey Jenkins, MD []
CON
I am a practicing OBGYN in Des Moines. I am writing to urge the House to reconsider passing HSB 255. I understand the desire to prevent abortion. However, the reasons women seek this procedure are myriad and complex. It is truly a lifesaving procedure for many women. Please trust that your constituents, in consultation with their doctors, are capable of making this decision. I also urge you to consider the significant impact this law will have on access to medical care in the State of Iowa. We already have a maternity care crisis in this State. If this law goes in to effect, the only OBGYN residency training program in our State will be at high risk of losing it's accreditation. OBGYN residency programs are required by the ACGME to provide access to abortion training. Our neighboring states of MN and IL which have not restricted abortion access are already overwhelmed with the influx of patients and trainees from neighboring states. It is unlikely they could accommodate additional trainees from our state. If the OBGYN residency closes this will jeopardize the Neonatology Fellowship Program at the U of I as well. A robust obstetrical program is required to support Neonatology in the care of complex and high risk pregnancies. The best chance we have of recruiting doctors to practice in Iowa is to train them here. Once that ability is lost, it will be near impossible to sustain our workforce, let alone continue to expand it to provide care to the substantial maternity deserts which already exist. Regardless of personal feelings on abortion, this decision is not a political one. Please do not let politics interfere with our ability to provide healthcare to the people of Iowa.
07-10-2023
Leah Vanden Bosch [Representing myself]
CON
I would like to speak in opposition to HSB 255, as someone who has received abortion care in the state of Iowa.
07-10-2023
Katelynn Nank []
CON
I am writing to express my deep concern regarding proposed legislation that restricts reproductive rights and access to safe and legal abortion services. It is crucial to protect the autonomy and wellbeing of individuals in our society.The right to choose is not about promoting or encouraging abortions but recognizing that each person's situation is unique. By supporting reproductive choice, we empower individuals to make decisions based on their own circumstances, including their health, financial stability, and personal aspirations.Denying individuals the right to choose forces them into dangerous situations, risking their health and lives. Legal and accessible abortion services are crucial to ensuring the safety and wellbeing of all individuals.Supporting reproductive choice means supporting families and children. Many individuals seeking abortions are already parents facing difficult circumstances. By allowing individuals to make the best decisions for their families, we prevent children from growing up in poverty, neglect, or limited opportunities.Respecting individual freedom is at the core of supporting reproductive rights. Our society values personal liberty and the ability to make decisions that align with our beliefs and circumstances. Denying individuals the right to choose infringes upon their fundamental rights and restricts personal freedoms.I implore you to stand on the right side of history by supporting and protecting reproductive rights for all individuals. Let us ensure access to safe and legal reproductive healthcare options, comprehensive family planning, contraception, and sex education.
07-10-2023
Lori Kramer [None]
CON
I am writing to voice my opposition for this law that drags women's right to bodily autonomy back to the good old days when we couldn't have a bank account, got fired for being pregnant, couldn't own property, have a credit card and had to rely on men for basic survival. I am not interested in returning to those days for myself or my daughters. I would like to remind all of you that you are not doctors, and you have no business legislating medical decisions made between a patient and their doctor. Iowans support access to safe and legal abortions, this is not what the majority of Iowan's want or asked to be done. If you think it is, I suggest you put it on the ballot for a vote. Let the will of the people decide.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The government micromanaging and arbitrarily dictating individuals' health care decisions is an affront to a sense of personal liberty as well as the state's motto. Keep the government out of individuals' personal health care decisions.
07-10-2023
Brittany Zumbach [NA]
CON
We cannot right the wrongs of the unborn by taking away the basic human rights of the mother. There are evils worse than killing or murder, even if you believe this about abortion. An evil I would consider worse is torture. The UN definition for torture includes severely limiting or eliminating access to abortion, which this bill hopes to accomplish. 6 weeks gestation, which is counted from the 1st day of your last period, is not enough time for most women to even realize they are pregnant. It's an arbitrary timeline designed to effectively ban all abortions. With its passing, women will officially have fewer rights than a corpse. You cannot harvest organs from the deceased without their explicit, prior consent, even if those organs would save other patient's lives. Yet, here we are, about to force women, regardless of their will, to carry their pregnancy to term after an electrical signal that mimics a heartbeat is detected. The heart doesn't even form until the 10th week. Regardless of party, the Iowa legislature is tasked with protecting the rights of all Iowans. This includes Iowans that have a uterus.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The government micromanaging and arbitrarily dictating individuals' health care decisions is an affront to a sense of personal liberty as well as the state's motto. Keep the government out of individuals' personal health care decisions.
07-10-2023
Amy McBeth []
CON
This bill flies against religious liberty, privacy rights, and personal autonomy in health care.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [University of Iowa]
CON
Stop calling the fetus and unborn child. At 6 weeks It is not a child, the fetus doesn't have a brain and its development can be threatened by viruses, toxic compounds, genetic factors, poor nutrition or stress. This bill comes out of the believe system of ultra privileged persons, who would rather point fingers at "bad mothers" instead of making things easier for them to have a wanted baby.
07-10-2023
Dana Sanders [Educator ]
CON
Keep abortion legal. You never know the circumstances of what brought it on, including rape or health concerns, which the government should not be able to decide whether they believe that or not. It could also be a domestic violence situation where a perpetrator is holding that over someones head. It is not your business. Keep it legal. McClintock and Gerhold are both puppets in this and will not even respectfully listen. Ive even been threatened to be blocked by McClintock for voicing my non threatening opinion. How is that representation?. Its pathetic. Even if they try to say situations are OK, do you have to prove it and do they have to decide if they believe you? Keep it legal. Its not your freaking business. I will always help those in need of one.
07-10-2023
Shawn Knighton [NA]
CON
The abortion bi is not what Iowans want. If the governor is so parent choice with other matters, parents should have a choice on abortion rights.
07-10-2023
Sarah Small-Carter [Webster County Democrats ]
CON
This bill is unnecessary government overreach into the lives of all Iowans. Decisions regarding family building are personal and private. When seeking counsel on medical care, one reasonably consults family, close friends, but most importantly a higher power. The moral right to make the decision to terminate a pregnancy rests solely between a woman and her God. Government overreach on abortion, which disproportionately impacts women and the LGBTQ coommunity this time, sets a precedent that allows government overreach to nefariously into any of our lives at will. I strongly urge you to take action against this bill and vote no.
07-10-2023
Jason Braddy []
CON
This would be a violation of the privacy and bodily autonomy of women in our state, and does not serve a public need that would justify this intrusion. The "fetal heartbeat" framing is dishonest, as embryos at 6 weeks don't even have a heart yet, only cardiac cells with heartlike electrical activity. By picking this arbitrary signal which happens often before a woman is even aware she is pregnant this is essentially a ban without the honesty to call itself one.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None ]
CON
"Our liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain."This bill violates the rights of living Iowans and endangers Iowa women. It ignores scientific and medical consensus in favor of playing politics with the lives of Iowa families.
07-10-2023
Katherine Salamon [None]
CON
Bodily autonomy is the right of every human being, and politicians have no legitimate grounds to infringe upon it. Doing so is purely for cheap political points. It is arrogance of the highest order to ignore medical realities and restrict the freedom of Iowans to make their own healthcare choices.
07-10-2023
Gina Hausknecht [none]
CON
I am strongly opposed to HSB 255 and to the rushed process of a special legislative session that circumvents full public input. Bodily autonomy is at the very core of what it means to be free. The bill, enforcing state control over womens bodies, is a strange and unconscionable swerve from this legislatures adamant commitment to personal choice on matters such as schools and guns. Yet much more fundamental than where you send your kids to school or can carry firearms is your right to your own body. Iowans understand that people need to decide for themselves, with the guidance of their family members, their doctors, and their most trusted advisors, whether and when to have a child. Recent polling indicates that 61% of Iowans believe abortion should be legal in most or all circumstances. This is a consistent finding: we deserve our legislators explaining to us why it doesnt matter. When Gov. Reynolds invokes the voters who want an abortion ban, presumably she refers to the Iowans who have elected and reelected a conservative Republican majority and reelected her. But voters are motivated by many issues, and the polling demonstrating majority support in Iowa for abortion rights has been clear and steady: how does the governor square these two kinds of evidence for what Iowans want? A special session, moving fast, is the wrong way to decide this critically important issue it is politics at its worst and most undemocratic.So much about this bill is based in subjective and political framing of pregnancy. The term fetal heartbeat is misleading: medically, an embryo at this stage is not a fetus and, medically, the first electrical impulses that can be detected are not necessarily a heartbeat. HSB 255 rests on the premise that a life with political rights begins at conception; this is not a medical perspective or universal truth. It is one religious perspective, not held by all Christians or by many other faith traditions, including the one I come from which understands life beginning at birth, rather than conception. Iowans support for legal reproductive rights acknowledges these decisions are often complex and complicated, involving many factors specific to each individual pregnancy. The inflammatory, callous, often inaccurate, and often meanspirited language with which the bills supporters discuss abortion suggests they are not doing the hard work of balancing competing needs and values, and of recognizing Iowans nuanced attitudes toward reproductive rights. Many people who describe themselves as prolife also believe that decisions about abortion should be left to the individual. A majority of those seeking abortions have already had at least one child; they are making decisions about what is in the best interest of their family as a whole. Many women who assert they are prolife choose abortion when they believe that is the best path for them and their families. I respect the governor when she indicates she finds abortion morally repugnant; I find forcing people to bring pregnancies to term against their will morally repugnant. I find the state insisting that a body that can bear a child must bear a child morally repugnant and tyrannous. The bill is written as if it were not a total ban but in practice it will be. Abortion is already difficult for many Iowans to access, even under current law, and that difficulty is not evenly distributed: poor and working class people are much more significantly disadvantaged. Beyond the existing legal restrictions on how and when people can get an abortion in Iowa, the political meddling in medical matters means fewer and fewer doctors receive the training to provide abortions and even fewer elect to do so in a hostile and threatening environment. Being for abortion rights is not the same as being for abortion it is trusting our neighbors to know what is right for them and asking that we be allowed to know what is right for ourselves and our families. These are Iowa values.It is odd urging state legislators to respect the clear will of the people; one assumes that is what you are there to do. Take the time to ask your constituents what they want, take the time to have the full conversation in a regular legislative session, and then take a vote that lets all Iowans know you are listening to us and you represent us.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Do not take away womens rights!
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
Taking away a persons right or choice is against a government that is based on and works with peoples opinions and freedom of thinking and choice
07-10-2023
Renee williams []
CON
Please do not remove women's rights to bodily autonomy and health care. Im ready to leave Iowa and I have lived here my whole life.
07-10-2023
Amy Newell []
CON
Abortion is healthcare. This is an issue for women, their family and their healthcare provider. This bill is wasting tax payer money to take away the rights of the women of this state. I am strongly opposed.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The state doesn't have any business deciding for women what a medical professional should be deciding, on a perpatient basis, and not as an allencompassing policy based primarily in faith.A majority (60%) of Iowans do not support this bill as presented.Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain
07-10-2023
Catherine St Clair [n/a]
CON
Keep HEALTHCARE, including abortion and contraception, safe and legal in the state of Iowa. We've already seen circumstances in other states after they pass abortion restrictions that have had serious and fatal results for women. The state has neither the right nor expertise to dictate bodily autonomy over any human. Abortion is a medical issue between a doctor and patient, not the state of Iowa nor any religious entity or beliefs held by legislators.Polling shows that the majority of Iowans are opposed to this measure. Listen to the people!
07-10-2023
Julie Schendel [None]
CON
We must maintain womens rights to make decisions about their own bodies. No more women carrying dead babies to full term. No more forcing rape victims to bear a rapists child. No more failing to treat a miscarriage because the doctor is afraid it will be labeled an abortion. No more women who die in childbirth. We must keep and attract good doctors willing to practice gynecology and obstetrics. We have a GOPcontrolled legislature that clearly doesnt care about mothers and children once they are born. We must protect womens reproductive freedom.
07-10-2023
Angela McConville [resident of Iowa]
CON
I can't believe I have to take the time out of my extremely busy life and workday to deal with this government intervention crap coming from the statehouse. I realize you aren't smart enough to be aware of this, but the only people with time on their hands to contact you and complain about abortion are 1) nonresidents of Iowa who are paid to complain and 2) UNEMPLOYABLE people with no life and no hobbies other than being keyboard scum, leaving their unintelligible sludge all over social media. I am annoyed that you concede any of your time to listen to these unproductive wastes of oxygen. Us working, Iowa propertyowning people with houses to clean and families to raise trust that the people we elect will legislate in our best interest, so we can work and volunteer (to keep Iowa functioning) without having to think about what you are doing. Clearly, you can't be trusted and bend the knee to unemployable trash... so here I am having to craft a statement during my lunchbreak. Leave my right to privacy with my doctor alone. Leave my body alone. It is amusing to me that people in this century are foolish enough to fall for the lies of cults, like organized religion, but I don't discriminate against them, oppress them, or tell them how to live their lives. In turn, they need to keep their unfounded beliefs about reproduction out of my life and the lives of my children. I'm a real Iowan; I've been here since I was five years old. You must not be aware that our state's informal motto is "Not my thing, not for me, but not my business what you do." The actions of the last year certainly shows how little you know about real Iowans. You do realize we are in the NORTH? We are welcoming, progun, proindividual rights, proUnion antiracists here. You want Iowa to be Florida so bad, then move there. Keep your fascist legislation out of my state. We already have too many poor kids to take care of, and you want more? Seems like an irresponsible choice to me. Can't trust you people with adult decisions, so how can I trust you with my tax dollars? Keep going so far right and the educated people will keep fleeing. I realize that's what you want as uneducated people vote Republican but you don't seem to realize that we can't take care of our aging population without an educated populace.
07-10-2023
Jessie J. Liebenguth []
CON
Enacting this abortion bill makes Iowa unsafe for people able to bear children. I don't believe that the medical decisions I make as a woman for my body and my health are the business of the state government. Reproductive care, including abortion, is health care and the decisions for my body regarding all health care should be between myself and my medical care team, not the legislature. If abortion is banned in Iowa, arbortion will not stop in Iowa; it will become a medical procedure performed by amateurs, desperate people, and unscrupulous characters preying on those desperate people. Abortion, if outlawed, will become unregulated, putting the lives of people like me and the people I love in danger. Outlawing abortion is punishing people able to bear children and infringing on our rights to privacy and personal liberty. Iowa government and lawmakers are sending many mixed messages to the constituents of our great statefetuses are paramount and should be protected at all costs; when children are born, they are not supported through education, labor protection, or governmental assistance. I find it dispicable that our governor and legislature feel it is there place to make medical decision for my and take away my liberties.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Termination of a pregnancy is a private matter between a woman, her God, and her health care provider. Government should not be involved in such a decision.If the proponents of this bill care so much about human life, they need demonstrate that by passing legislation that provides care and assistance to children/families in poverty and fully funds public education.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
I want to keep HEALTHCARE, including abortion and contraception, safe and legal in the state of lowa. We have already seen situations in other states after they pass abortion restrictions that lead to serious and fatal results for people due to the law. Medical decisions should be made solely between the patient and doctor and the legislature should not overreach into peoples private medical issues and family circumstances.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This bill is extremely dangerous for womens health.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
I want to keep HEALTHCARE, including abortion and contraception, safe and legal in the state of lowa. We have already seen situations in other states after they pass abortion restrictions that lead to serious and fatal results for people due to the law. Medical decisions should be made solely between the patient and doctor and the legislature should not overreach into peoples private medical issues and family circumstances.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Self]
CON
Please allow Iowans the right to choose what is best for their health and well being. Thank you.
07-10-2023
Cassie Peters []
CON
It should be a choice between a woman and her doctor. Nobody should be forced to carry a child against their will. No woman should be forced to carry their rapists child. No woman should be forced to carry a baby that has severe medical issues. No woman should die because they have an ectopic pregnancy that will kill them if they don't abort it even though they desperately wanted that child.
07-10-2023
Joseph Robertson []
CON
Iowa government should be focused on state matters and stopping meddling in partisan decisions that are personal choices.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Self]
CON
Please allow Iowans the right to choose what is best for their health and well being. Thank you.
07-10-2023
Joseph Robertson []
CON
Iowa government should be focused on state matters and stopping meddling in partisan decisions that are personal choices.
07-10-2023
Amanda Michels [No organization ]
CON
62% of Iowans disagree with this. Voting against this is the right thing to do. You do not need to be a puppet of the governor. Instead, think about what is truly right here. Think of your daughters and granddaughters. What if they get put in a situation and abortion becomes a necessity for them? You can be prolife for yourself, but ultimately you should be prochoice for everyone else. Do not ram this through. This is wrong. This should remain a decision between a woman and her doctor. This bill will effectively tell women the government controls your body! If you are concerned about protecting life, then for Gods sake, start taking care of the Iowans who are currently living and breathing! Mental Health, smarter gun safety, protect public education! Iowa will be in the bottom 10 states to live in if we continue on this path! Iowa is becoming not so Iowa Nice.
07-10-2023
Amanda marie Ehrenberg-Koch [N/a]
CON
Government should have no say in a person's Healthcare. Those decisions should be left to the individual and the medical staff caring for them. It was too much for Iowans to wear a mask during a pandemic, this is a much larger invasion of someone's bodily autonomy.
07-10-2023
Chris Hemmer []
CON
I'm totally against banning abortion.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
Its okay for you to disagree with getting an abortion just like its okay for me to agree with getting an abortion. In this country, we can make our own choices and to take away the choice of an abortion from a woman cannot be tolerated. If you dont believe in abortions then dont get one. Thats your choice. We are hurting those people with uteruses and babies further if we ban abortions.
07-10-2023
Robin Torner []
CON
You will drive away young, educated women from Iowa and put those who remain at risk of poverty, hardship and possible death. The decision for an abortion should be between a woman, her family, her doctor and God. Not politicians.
07-10-2023
Courtney Goad [Infertility Provider ]
CON
Abortions are currently safe medical procedures that save lives. Making abortions illegal will not lower the number of abortions that are performed in the United States, rather they will become dangerous, and increase the risk of death from an abortion procedure.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
An ill conceived, dangerous bill endangering the lives of living mothers over the potential, future life of a fetus totally dependent on the mother.A heart beat alone does not indicate "life" in US history or law as evidenced by our acceptance of living wills and hospice care.Please do not interfere in these very difficult decisions that belong with the mother and her physician.
07-10-2023
Sue Johanningmeier []
CON
Do not take away a woman's right to choice. These are deeply personal decisions between a woman and her health care physician. Not for government to involve in. This really IS NOT about protecting children, it is about power and control. Guns are the number 1 cause of children dying. No legislation or special sessions for that.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [NARAL Pro-Choice America]
CON
It is wrong to wrench a woman's right to decide what happens in her body.
07-10-2023
Darla J Knutson []
CON
No politicians should be able to regulate what I xhhose to do with my body. Let's give every male baby born a vasectomy. He can reverse said vasectomy when he is responsible to care for possible babies he would make.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am strongly opposed to an abortion ban of any kind in our state, however banning abortion before many women know they are pregnant, will most likely impact their health and wellbeing. Preventing doctors from providing care to women is neglegent and dangerous and scares me for the future of my daughter.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The decisions surrounding medical procedures should be between a person and their doctor with as little interference from government bodies as possible. The state has no legal standing to impose restrictions, nor do they have the medical expertise to propose legislation for such restrictions.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I urge lawmakers in Iowa to prioritize the safety and legality of healthcare, including abortion and contraception. It is crucial to learn from the detrimental outcomes witnessed in other states following the implementation of restrictive abortion laws. The issue of abortion should remain within the realm of medical professionals and their patients, who are equipped to make informed decisions based on the best available medical knowledge.The State lacks the authority and specialized knowledge to enforce regulations that go against the will of the majority of Iowans, as evident from polling data.This encroachment on personal medical decisions must be acknowledged as a fundamental threat to our democracy and swiftly rejected.
07-10-2023
Katy Siddall []
CON
Iowans support each other and our personal decisions, but today the Governor is attacking our freedoms and the will of Iowa voters. We know politicians should not interfere with our personal lives, our families, and our right to access abortion. This bill is an attack on our freedoms that would steal our right to decide whats best for our lives and our families. Most Iowans are supporters of abortion access. As the majority, we arent going anywhere. We know that any ban is bad for Iowa and we will keep fighting it. It's time legislators on both sides of the aisle stand up for the freedoms of Iowans to decide what's best for ourselves and our families, and vote no on bills like that that would ban abortion access in Iowa.
07-10-2023
Cordae E Wright []
CON
My body, my choice! As someone who lost their virginity to rape, I thank God I had the choice. Do not take this away from other women!
07-10-2023
Angela OTool []
CON
I am against bill HSB255, as I am a firm believer in REPRODUCTIVE FREEDOM!The gender inequality and abuse of power in all places of government, work and society needs to STOP. "Gender equality means that the different behavior, aspirations and needs of women and men are considered, valued and favored equally. It does not mean that women and men have to become the same, but that their rights, responsibilities and opportunities will not depend on whether they are male or female." It seems where I work, what I read, and where I go, society is still fostering a cultureclimate of inequality between genders. Some times subtle and some times aggressive and in your face. This bill and legislation like it is dragging this Nation back into the dark ages, and quite frankly, into a dictatorship. None of this is healthy or fair to the generations now or to come. Please keep these United States of America FAIR for ALL. MY BODYMY CHOICE!Thank you,Angela O'Tool
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
As an Iowan, I oppose this bill. We should not pass an abortion ban in our state that will block people from having the freedom to decide what happens to their own bodies. Please oppose HSB 255 and do not pass an abortion ban.
07-10-2023
Jason Neises [n/a]
CON
I am one of the vast majority of Iowans who think that reproductive health decisions should be made by women and their doctors, not Iowa legislators or the governor. Restricting abortions in this manner will go against the will of the majority of Iowa voters. We do not need this legislation in Iowa.
07-10-2023
Lorrie Hanson [NARAL Pro-Choice]
CON
Please vote no on abortion bans!
07-10-2023
Ron Kreassig []
CON
Keep your church and belief system out of our politics and womens health care. Separation of church and state is constitutional. Follow the science. Many women dont even know they are pregnant by 6 weeks. In cases of rape and incest, many cannot report to the police or authorities. Do you know how far behind some areas are in processing rape kits? Stop trying to control womens lives. They are not second class citizens.
07-10-2023
Kelsey Culver [none]
CON
I am against HSB 255. This bill would strip me of my right to make healthcare decisions for myself. Outlawing abortion in Iowa would put thousands of people at risk for death, longterm illness, and abuse.
07-10-2023
Jim Davis [Private citizen]
CON
I am against this bill because it is a draconian measure to strip away the rights of a woman and her physician to make her own health care decisions. The passage of this bill will result in significant pain and suffering for thousands of women in years to come.
07-10-2023
Pamela A Terrill []
CON
I am against the fetal heartbeat law being enacted. I am a practicing RN for 40 years in women and children health. I am acutely aware that 6 weeks is too early for an abortion plan. A fetus at 6 weeks with a heartbeat is NOT viable. I agree there needs to be a limit on the length of time that an abortion can be performed, but NOT 6 weeks..... no less than 16 weeks is my belief. Women who do not have regular periods have no idea about pregnancy for several months. In addition, I feel that abortion is a legal option in the cases of incest and rape. These victims should not be victimized twice if they desire a termination. And, it is my body; my choice up to a longer termination period. This emergency session is being called due to political means!!!!
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Bambi Yost Research & Design]
CON
Dear Governor Reynolds,I am vehemently opposed to your sneaky attempt to control women's bodies. No one should have the ability to tell a young girl or capable adult that she must give birth. There are far too many medical, economical, emotional, and psychological reasons NOT to have a child. Please stop the attack on female reproductive freedoms. It is simply wrong.I am childless by choice and so glad that I was not ever forced to give birth like a cow.Sincerely,Bambi L YostAmes, IA
07-10-2023
Meleah Cue [Self]
CON
As an Iowan, I oppose this bill. We should not pass an abortion ban in our state that will block people from having the freedom to decide what happens to their own bodies. Please oppose HSB 255 and do not pass an abortion ban. This will only result in death and poverty and the continued economic destruction of our state.
07-10-2023
Kelly Ortiz []
CON
Governor Reynolds, you know a 6 week restriction is effectively a ban. You know 2 of those weeks are nongestational and the other 4 weeks there is nothing more than a zygote without a fully formed heart. The heartbeat you speak of at that stage is an electrical pulse translated into sound by the ultrasound machine. At 4 gestational weeks, most women wont know they are pregnant. And you know that. If you think your constituents agree with you, put this specific issue to a vote. Let us tell you what we think, instead of ramming it through in this authoritarian fashion.
07-10-2023
Sharon Kendall Dunn []
CON
In the Tragedy of Julius Caesar, Brutus says, "Where wilt thou find a cavern dark enough / To mask thy monstrous visage? Seek none,conspiracy; / Hide it in smiles and affability." There is absolutely no pretense displayed by the Iowa GOP as they smile and lay out their sinister agenda for Iowa. They preach freedom as they smile and celebrate as they take away our freedoms simply because they can. It is clear the Iowa GOP is governing as if Christianity was a political party without any regard for the diversity of religions in this state. They seem unaware of Iowans rights to not be coerced into the establishment of any one religion upon them. And they are ignoring the importance of Separation of Church & State which was based on early Americans fears of government interference. This Iowa Legislature is interfering with Iowans rights to autonomy with this special session not to mention wasting taxpayer dollars again on a selfserving manufactured crisis.Gov. Reynolds and the Iowa GOP would like us to believe they strongly support prolife principles and are against the arbitrary destruction of innocent, defenseless lives." But the hypocrisy of their actions is shocking as they choose to focus on only ONE prolife issue, the one that gets them cheap votes from their base and panders to their national handlers in their selfserving power quest for national fame and higher political ambitions. They have abandoned Iowans once again in prioritizing power and profit over people with this special session on the taxpayers dime. If this was really about prolife principles or against the arbitrary destruction of innocent, defenseless lives as Reynolds says, they would certainly want to be consistent in saving all of our lives, correct? We as Iowans, are ALL innocent AND defenseless against the powerful, wellfinanced selfserving interests in this state and their lobbyists that the Iowa GOP has pledged their allegiance. If they were genuinely against the arbitrary destruction of innocent, defenseless lives they would acknowledge the legal fact that trash set out in a garbage can for collection is entitled to more constitutional protection than a woman's interest in autonomy and dominion over her own body; the attorney general wouldnt further violate women in distress by withholding Plan B from rape victims; they would have extended postpartum Medicaid coverage for mothers; they would hold a special session to solve the lack of affordable child care and raise child care worker wages, not pass the buck onto 16 year old workers to solve their problem; they wouldnt accept blood money from the NRA to weaken existing common sense gun laws and acknowledge that unregulated gun violence kills our children; Iowa nursing homes wouldnt be shutting down at a rapid rate and have such a shameful record of care; they would have taken the necessary precautions in preventing covid deaths (fyi, pregnancy isnt contagious but covid is); they would acknowledge that Planned Parenthood is an ally with the State in helping women, not the enemy, in providing affordable health care and acknowledging the lack of access to birth control has actually increased abortions and placed unnecessary burden on women seeking help out of state; not increasing the Medicaid rate for medical practitioners limits healthcare access to our most vulnerable population and results in a denial of timely care and probably the biggest issue in this state that causes arbitrary destruction of innocent, defenseless lives is how big agricultural and manufacturing interests are allowed to conduct their business without regulations or oversight regulations that are designed to protect human health. As of 2022, Iowa is number two in the country for the rate of cancer incidence! Lack of oversight on protecting our water and air quality from these industries is literally making Iowans of all ages sick and killing us. Not very prolife is it? How do Iowans protect themselves against those who have an army of lawyers, lobbyists and money? Iowans would be better protected if our politicians werent so eager to build their financial war chests off industries only interested in making record profits and consumed by making a national name for themselves. You may think this is a simple issue of just protecting the unborn but its essential you acknowledge all the other issues in Iowa that affect saving lives. Maybe you think you cant because you are unwilling to separate your religious beliefs from your legislative elected duties to represent all Iowans? The majority of Iowans do not want any further restrictions on abortion, are you listening?
07-10-2023
Ann Marie Gale [Retired]
CON
I believe that families are in the best position to make choices about thier medical decisions, and politicians should have no part in restricting women's healthcare.
07-10-2023
Ruth Saulsbury [Butler County Democrats ]
CON
This is so much more than just saying banning abortion is a bad plan. It needs to be said that removing access to clinics who provide a wide variety of options for family planning is bad plan. It is a bad plan to restrict access to health care, continue to short and eliminate programs that support mother and child through pregnancy, after birth and through childhood. Life exists 70100 years after heartbeat is detected. Access to quality food, water, health care and even clean air is a must for all Iowans. Make a plan to create that in our Legislature, not use this political platform to take away the reproductive rights of women.
07-10-2023
Bethany Glinsmann []
CON
I am against all legislation that will restrict abortion rights in any way. 1. Public polls have shown that the majority of Iowans support abortion access in all/most situations. 2. Further restricting abortion access will limit Iowa's ability to attract new residents and out of state college students. It will entice more Iowans to leave the state. I personally know of two young families that have decided to move out of state specifically because of the push to further restrict abortion rights. Can our state afford this when we are trying to grow our economy?3. Holding a rushed special session for the sole issue of restricting abortion rights does not offer time for the public and interest groups to provide input on the legislation. Such an important issue should be addressed in a regular session, following normal timelines and procedures.
07-10-2023
Chris Gleason []
CON
Women should make their own decisions about their own health care not politicians.
07-10-2023
Andrew Steffen []
CON
Government and/or religion have no business deciding what is right for an individual.
07-10-2023
Ryan Pratt []
CON
This is embarrassing and repulsive. I vehemently oppose this undemocratic and unconscionable bill. I support human bodily autonomy, especially for Iowans with a uterus.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
All citizens have a right to bodily autonomy from 2A to reproductive rights. None should be restricted by the government.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The decisions regarding abortion are a medical issue that should be between the physicians and their patient. They should be able to come to the best possible decision for all concerned based on the best medical information.The State has no standing nor expertise to impose rules that polling shows are opposed by a majority of Iowans.This overreach should be recognized for what it is and be quickly dismissed as a basic threat to our democracy.
07-10-2023
Jonathan Grieder []
CON
Healthcare professionals and women should make healthcare decisions without the state interfering. Please vote against this ban.
07-10-2023
Ingrid E. B. Anderson []
CON
Dont take away a womans rights regarding her own body. We do not want politicians without medical knowledge make life or death decisions over our heads. Is this America, the land of the free? You want to protect the unborn, but not the born children? Focus on Gun violence please, and leave our bodies alone. Equality!Ingrid Anderson
07-10-2023
Shannon Belcher [Citizen]
CON
Gov Kim Reynolds and her conservative counterparts mislead and misinform their constituents.At six weeks "the heart beat" heard in ultrasound are from the embryonic cluster of cells emitting electrical impulses These cells will coordinate into the main heart structure and organized cardiac function. The fetal heart's main structure is not formed until around 9 weeks and then the valves (which actually make the sound of our heartbeats) are developed around 16 weeks. This is when a woman would usually have and ultrasound to detect fetal cardiac anomaly.Misleading and truly discouraging that Governor Reynold's and the conservative Republicans would rally to save a cluster of cells, yet condemn a women to carry a fetal demise until her body naturally initiates the birthing process or she becomes septic. Over and over again the "prolife" continue to expose the public to halftruths and outright deception. They continuing to bolster the illusory truth effect through reiteration of falsehoods.I vote for the truth.
07-10-2023
Julie Funk [Personal]
CON
The decisions regarding abortion are a medical issue that should be between the physicians and their patient. They should be able to come to the best possible decision for all concerned based on the best medical information.The State has no standing nor expertise to impose rules that polling shows are opposed by a majority of Iowans.This overreach should be recognized for what it is and be quickly dismissed as a basic threat to our democracy.
07-10-2023
Victoria Walton []
CON
Reproductive freedom is one critical aspect of healthcare. Healthcare decisions belong to the individual, their family, and to their doctor, not to legislators. We are not in support of HSB 255.Wally Plahutnik and Victoria Walton
07-10-2023
Laura Heithoff [Woman ]
CON
I am very opposed to increasing abortion restrictions in our state. The saying, "You never know what someone is going through. Be kind," keeps coming to my mind in this scenario. Ultimately NOBODY but we women involved and our doctors know in making decisions for our bodies know what is going on and how those decisions will affect our lives for the rest of our life. Is Bob Vander Plaats or Governor Reynolds going to come feed the hungry child?Are they going to cover medical expenses of the child? Are they sending them to school with supplies? Are they going to encourage physicians to reside here when every decision they make to protect women will be scrutinized by people who haven't gone to one day of medical school? And I say this as a woman who built my family by adoption. That is not an easy fix; which is shown by how many antiabortion activists actually work to improve the foster care system or adopt. How many systems in place for supporting women and children have been underfunded or slashed right before this? So many safeguards, including public schools and supports for LGBTQ students and students of color, have had the rug pulled out from under them under the GOP majority. Do we really think desperate women won't have abortions? Maybe just try what Colorado did that actually reduced the number of abortions: free reproductive care. Or just put the onus on men for once and require them to ejaculate more responsibly...after all, they are the ones who can reproduce every day and are also responsible for 100% of unplanned pregnancies. If you're prolife, please for the love of God, be WHOLE pro life. Not just probirth.
07-10-2023
Tara Shochet [NA]
CON
I am writing to express my strong opposition to this bill. All people need and deserve access to the full range of reproductive health services including abortion. Banning access to this critical component of healthcare will delay care, keep individuals from seeking followup treatments when needed, and will make clinicians question and put off treatment of a multitude of pregnancy complications (including ectopic pregnancy, which is life threatening) for fear of legal repercussions.There is no "heartbeat" at 6 weeks, as the heart has not developed yet. This is a definition fabricated by the antichoice contingency and not based on medicine or science. This absurd definition will outlaw almost all abortions in our state, as many people do not know they are pregnant until they are past this marker of tissue development.The majority of Iowans support the right to abortion. Individuals deserve to have bodily autonomy and to make medical decisions in consultation with trusted medical staff not via fiat from politicians.This bill is an outrageous attempt to control Iowans' bodies, and submit us to the religious will of Conservative Christians, whose religious opinions should not be (and legally cannot be) forced on an entire state. I implore our elected officials to vote down this dangerous bill.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The state should have no say in what its people do with their bodies. Especially in determining if a procedure is medically necessary. You are legislators (if you can be called such), not medical doctors. Stay in your lane. We could be doing other beneficial things like legalizing marijuana and reaping the tax benefits like other states already are.
07-10-2023
Corey Gillespie []
CON
All people should enjoy a right to bodily autonomy. The proposed legislation would infringe that right for approximately 50 percent of the population. As a result, I cannot in good conscience condone the contents of the proposed legislation.
07-10-2023
Toni Van Voorhis []
CON
This issue should NOT be legislated. So much is happening in our oncegreat state that the brain drain has already begun. I used to be proud to say I was an Iowan. Now I find it to be an embarrassment.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Concerned Citizen]
CON
I want to keep HEALTHCARE, including abortion and contraception, safe and legal in the state of Iowa. We've seen circumstances in other states after they pass abortion restrictions that these restrictions have serious and fatal results for people. I don't want someone to die or be forced to carry to term a child they do not want. Quality of life for the child is important and I don't want them to be neglected by the state or by parents that do not want them.
07-10-2023
Brittany Frey [Iowa Abortion Hearing being held]
CON
I would like to protest making abortion illegal at any stage of pregnancy. I believe HEALTHCARE should be accesible to all, in addition to providing care that will ensure their health.
07-10-2023
Susan Peterson []
CON
Abortion is an important health care option. Trust women and their doctors to decide when and if it is appropriate. Legislation limiting access to health care only hurts people.
07-10-2023
Susan Schulz [Citizen]
CON
Legislation that regulates a woman's and doctor's plan of health care plan is unethical and immoral. This issue is larger than abortion. Its about all of women's reproductive rights. Will birth control be next on your agenda? Bottom line you do not have the right to make arbitrary rules about my health care!
Attachment
07-10-2023
Amanda Bullard [CIAC]
CON
Your rights and religious beliefs should not infringe on another's. A woman should have the right to decide what happens to her own body.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am against this bill: this should be between a female and their doctor. No one else. If it is not about controlling a female, then just give vasectomies to all males. I mean To say this bill is prolife is a lie. If it was a prolife bill it would include maternal care pre and post for the first year after birth, medical care expenses covered, it would include childcare support, snap benefits for the mother and child, free school lunches for all children, parenting support and training throughout childhood. This bill makes being female a second class citizen who is not allowed to make choices for their own body.
07-10-2023
Sherry Schwint [Planned Parenthood ]
CON
I believe women should have control over their own lives. Governments and religions should have any rights in this matter. I beg you to please allow women to be able to have abortions!
07-10-2023
Diane Thayer []
CON
Keep women's reproductive rights and health care legal! No governor or governing body has the right to dictate what a woman may or may not do with her body.
07-10-2023
Martha C Shaw []
CON
The decision to have an abortion is one that belongs to a woman and her doctor. It does not belong to politicians. Please do not restrict access to safe and legal abortions.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The decisions regarding abortion are a medical issue that should be between the physicians and their patient. They should be able to come to the best possible decision for all concerned based on the best medical information.The State has no standing nor expertise to impose rules that polling shows are opposed by a majority of Iowans.This overreach should be recognized for what it is and be quickly dismissed as a basic threat to our democracy.
07-10-2023
David Ferree []
CON
This bill, HSB 255, should not pass. The majority of Iowans are opposed to this bill. This is government interference in one of the most basic choices a woman has to make. It forces unwanted pregnancies and unwanted, and for many, unaffordable, children. It is simply bad policy as well as big government overreach at its worst.
07-10-2023
Nick Bergus []
CON
Outlawing abortion before the point most pregnant people know they are pregnant will not lead to the end abortions in Iowa. This proposed ban will lead to unsafe abortions. It will lead to unhealthy women. It will lead to babies who were known to be unviable still being carried to term. It will lead to dead wouldbe mother. It will lead to unwanted or unsupported children. It will lead to rape survivors being responsible for easing their rapists children.Mandating procedures for how doctors can advise their patients is the definition of overreaching, big government. If we trust Iowans, we should trust them with planning their parenthood and their medical decisions. And the majority of Iowans believe abortion should be legal and safe. Please oppose this bill.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
Morality of AbortionAll the arguments that I typically hear in support of abortion restrictions can be divided into three categories: arguments that center around the past circumstances resulting in the pregnancy, arguments focused on the possible future outcomes of the pregnancy and personal religious and spiritual beliefs.Now I want you to imagine for a moment a woman who just walked into an abortion clinic seeking abortion services. You dont know who she is or any details of her life other than that she is 6 weeks pregnant. I want you to imagine that you can freeze that moment in time. Now, at that moment, isolated in time, independent of what happened in the past or what could happen in the future, I want you to consider how you would justify giving that embryo more rights than that woman. That embryo is physically incapable of perceiving any stimuli or having any level of consciousness. The woman, on the other hand, is a fully sentient person with thoughts and feelings, hopes and dreams. Why shouldnt her feelings matter more than an embryo that has none? Empathy is defined as the ability to understand and share the feelings of another. If you have more empathy for an embryo than you do for a sentient person, youre doing it wrong. Quite frankly, its infuriating to be on the brink losing my rights in preference to an embryo.The specific circumstances leading to a pregnancy are completely irrelevant in conversations about abortion. Any objections to abortion that are in any way conditional on the past circumstances resulting in the pregnancy have nothing at all to do with the inherent morality or immorality of abortion and everything to personal views on the morality of sex. Any considerations brought into conversations about reproductive rights that seek to cast shame on some more than others based on their perceived level of innocence or purity are deeply sexist and patriarchal in nature. These ideologies are very harmful to the wellbeing of women and girls. Arguments made against abortion that are based on the possible future of the pregnancy if it were to be continued are equally null and void. Yes, the pregnancy could result in a child if it were to continue but it isnt that now. The same could be said that every individual egg and sperm has the potential create a child. We have no more moral obligation to a non sentient embryo than we do to individual egg and sperm cells.Now, the only option left is that your objections could be based on your personal religious and spiritual beliefs. If you believe in some fashion that an embryo has a soul or that it has a destiny or something along those lines, thats fine. You are perfectly entitled to your personal beliefs. You just arent allowed to legislate that others adhere to them. That is a violation of the right to religious freedom we are granted by the First Amendment of the Constitution.If you encountered a young woman about to take the abortion pills mifepristone and mifeprostol and end a pregnancy, would take them from her with your own hands as she cried and pleaded with you not to?I think, much like there is a disconnect between death when you cause it with the push of a button as opposed to strangling someone with your own hands, I think there is a disconnect here as well. I think a lot of lawmakers that intend to vote yes on this legislation would actually have a hard time if they had to go out there and actually enforce it themselves. And I want you to know if you vote yes for this, just because you do it legislatively, it will make you no less guilty of injustice than if you did it with your own two hands.I Shouldnt Have to Say This But 3rd Graders Shouldnt Be Forced to Have Their Rapists BabiesIn a political debate before the last election, Governor Kim Reynolds opponent Deidre DeJear shared a personal story about encountering a 3rd grader who was 3 months pregnant. Governor Reynolds only response was to decry that an abortion at that point would be a late term abortion. Governor Reynolds clearly indicated her position was that a 3rd grader should be forced to continue a pregnancy. This is dangerous and its an extreme position even by her own partys standards. Kim Reynolds is a fanatic who would willfully sacrifice actual children at the alter of the unborn. This is not what Iowans want. 61% of Iowans polled recently indicated that they wanted abortion to be legal in most or all cases. I cant even imagine what that percentage would be if they were asked if a 3rd grader should be allowed to have an abortion. Iowans dont want rape victims to be forced to carry and give birth to their rapists babies and while there is an exception for rape in this bill, it still requires victims to report their rapes within 45 days in order to qualify for that exception. Victims should not be forced to disclose their assaults against their wishes. They should not be burdened with hoops to jump through in order to get abortion care. And most egregiously, I would like to point out that I see nothing in this proposed bill that would exempt the 3rd grader in this example from having to comply with the 45 day requirement to report a rape. Since her pregnancy was not discovered until 3 months in, under this law, she would be forced to continue this traumatic pregnancy. Given the victims age, this pregnancy would be extremely high risk but this proposed bill specifically forbids age from being considered as a health exception . This 3rd grader would not be allowed to have an abortion until her life and health were in imminent danger at which point it could already be too late.The overwhelming majority of Iowans dont want to see a 3rd grader put in that situation. But this bill, if it is approved, would do just that. What other horrible situations will arise out of this legislation if we rush to make it law without carefully considering all the implications? This issue should not be rushed to a vote. In order to do what is best for Iowans you need to take the time to listen to what Iowans want and thoroughly consider this issue and all its complexities.Layla Houshmands StoryI first heard Layla Houshmand tell her story in a podcast series called Crossing the Line and I found it to be particularly compelling. I encourage you to look it up and listen to it but Ill summarize her story hereLayla woke up one morning with a severe headache, nausea and extremely impaired vision in one eye. She went to an ophthalmologist. During the exam, she vomited every time a light was shone in her eye. She recounted throwing up approximately twenty times during this appointment that lasted only an hour. Layla, having a Ph. D. in a medical field, recognized this as a symptom of increased intracranial pressure, similar to what happens when someone has a concussion. An ophthalmologist diagnosed that she was having a stroke in the optic nerve of her eye. She was told this condition was caused by her pregnancy. She was then also told that there was nothing they could do for her because she was 8 weeks pregnant and the only course of treatment could be harmful to her pregnancy. They told her to go home, take a baby aspirin and come back in a week. They refused her treatment and instead prioritized her pregnancy. Furthermore, the physician did everything possible to avoid bringing up abortion as an option or even saying anything that might lead her to that conclusion.Layla, however did come to that conclusion, so she called her gynecologist's office seeking an immediate abortion so she could be treated for her condition. The receptionist argued with her, refused to get a doctor on the phone and dismissed telling her that she should "take tylenol with some ice water."Left absolutely on her own to figure this out, in the mid afternoon, knowing that they would be closing soon, she called a local abortion clinic. They agreed to see her immediately and treated her compassionately and without delay. Layla described feeling like, for the first time since her condition started, that she was treated like the patient, not her pregnancy. Only after her abortion was she able finally able to receive the care she needed. She traveled across state lines to one of only a handful of emergency ophthalmologists in the country. Only then did she learn how much peril she was in when they explained to her that the condition could have spread to her brain causing permanent damage or even death. They told her that she did the right thing seeking an immediate abortion. They told her that if she had come to them still pregnant, they too would not have treated her.Layla Houshmand described her ordeal by saying that she felt like a second class citizen inside of her own body. She is now legally blind in one eye and left to wonder if that would have been the case if she had received the care she needed in a timelier fashion.I know that Layla Houshmand's story sounds like some nightmare that probably happened in Texas over the course of the last year, but no.This happened in the Spring of 2021. Before the Fall of Roe.In Maryland. A state that is relatively friendly to reproductive rights.Can you imagine how much worse this could have been in a post Roe world? In a state that does not protect reproductive rights? And yet, our Governor and many of our legislators want to go backwards from that?THIS is why the government should stay out of reproductive healthcare. Because sometimes we have a hard enough time as it is getting the care we need and deserve. The last thing we need is more obstacles and barriers!THIS is why we need bodily autonomy, among other reasons of course. People should be able to make decisions about their lives and bodies for any reason they see fit. Not just in life threatening situations.I know that many of you are going to point to this bill and say Oh but we have exceptions for the health and life of the mother so its fine! No, it is NOT FINE. Remember, Layla Houshmand did not even need to qualify for an exception. She was well within her rights to have an abortion for any reason. And yet, she was still needlessly placed in peril by a society that systematically devaluates women.To highlight this point, Ill add that an in depth investigation conducted by ProPublica and National Public Radio in 2017 that found that out of all the funding grants earmarked for maternal and child health only 6 percent of them are allocated to the health of mothers. This alarming statistic highlights the seriousness of the maternal health crisis in the U.S. Our society continually values womens capacity for making humans more than it values women as humans themselves. Layla and her husband have no immediate plans of starting a family because they are terrified of going through another traumatic experience. I have heard many stories of people living under these extreme bans saying that they want to start a family but are delaying doing so because they are afraid of being needlessly put in danger. Rather than forcing people to have children they dont want, maybe we should focus on making sure that people who want to have children feel safe and secure enough to do so!White Supremacy and AbleismNo conversation about reproductive rights is complete without an honest look at the influences of white supremacy and ableism. While antiabortion activists are quick to point at one of Planned Parenthoods founding members, Margaret Sanger they often exaggerate these claims and overall fail to miss the bigger picture. Sanger did a lot of work to bring birth control to disadvantaged and minority communities. Sanger saw uncontrolled fertility as a burden to these impoverished communities and birth control as a vital tool to help improve the wellbeing of those people. There is little reason to believe her work on this was racist in nature. In fact, as she saw it, ignoring these communities would have been racist. There is no evidence to suggest that she used any coercive means or forced anyone to use birth control. There are many unfounded claims about Sanger including blatantly racist remarks attributed to her which have been fabricated. However, it is true that Sanger did endorse Buck v. Bell, the Supreme Court ruling that opened the door for 60,000 forced sterilizations, a disproportionate number of them being ethnic minorities and people with disabilities. Planned Parenthood today denounces Sangers belief in eugenics. Antiabortion activists want you to believe that giving people A CHOICE is somehow racially motivated when actually the exact opposite is true. Full and free exercise of reproductive rights empowers and improves lives. It is critical that people are not disadvantaged by unplanned pregnancies.Forced reproduction and eugenics are two sides of the same coin. The decision of whether or when to have children is a deeply personal choice. Throughout all of human history, no one who has sought to limit or control the free exercise of reproductive rights has EVER been the good guy.My own abortion storyMy own abortion story is not unique or traumatizing in any way. I am a very typical example of the 1 out of 4 women who has an abortion in their lifetime. I was in my young 20s, I was going to school, working part time and doing volunteer work as well.Half of all the women who get abortions were using some form of birth control that failed when they became pregnant and that is what happened to me. I tried to be responsible and do the right thing. I made an appointment and went in to get on birth control. I really wanted and strongly felt that a long term and low maintenance option would be best for me, but I couldnt afford to pay the 800.00 out of pocket for those options. I was also told if my insurance covered ANY form of birth control, I was not eligible for financial assistance either. Thats because we DO NOT ADEQUATELY FUND BIRTH CONTROL PROGRAMS! My insurance covered prescription birth control pills so that was the only option I had.Like so many other women, I experienced awful side effects with the pill. It made me so horribly nauseous that I could not function in my day job. But I also worked an on call shift overnights which meant I had to resort to taking it basically when I could. Just based on my schedule sometimes that meant I was taking the pills 18 hours apart, sometimes closer to 36. What I didnt know was that it is VERY important to take pills at the same time everyday in order for them to work. I didnt know that. On top of that, Ill admit that amidst my chaotic schedule I did miss a few doses over a period of several months.But hey, at least I tried. My partner at that time never so much as asked me if I was on any birth control let alone offer to wear condoms. And thats an experience many women and girls have. 90% of the birth control market is targeted for women, purchased by women and used by women. Women are already carrying an unequal burden of pregnancy prevention. Now you are telling us if we dont execute our birth control usage perfectly that we will be forced to risk our health, our lives and our happiness in order to bear an unequal share of the consequences as well. This is unacceptable.When I experienced this unintended pregnancy I knew I was not prepared to be a parent and my partner agreed with that decision. Women who have abortions are characterized as being irresponsible, but for abortion felt like it was the responsible choice.When I had my abortion, I was told I was 5 and a half weeks pregnant. I dont know if there was a heartbeat or not. But I know from first hand experience how hard it is to meet a 6 week limit because I only just barely might have made it under that limit. According to a scientific study published in 2017, the average gestational age a woman finds out she is pregnant is 5.5 weeks. This gives the average woman just days to make a decision, make an appointment (if she can get one) and make it into a clinic (if she can even afford it on such short notice). Worse still, at least one out of three women will not know they are pregnant until after six weeks. A ban after six weeks is an undue burden. It just isnt enough time.Besides that, banning abortions at six weeks using the justification of a heartbeat is extremely arbitrary and medically inaccurate. There is no heart, no chambers and no blood being pumped. Its just electrical signals. There isnt even an actual sound being made. The machine that detects this heartbeat isnt amplifying a sound. Its detecting the electrical signals and translating that into a sound.And for the record, like 95% of all women, I have never regretted my abortion decision.Healthcare ProvidersWhat about the healthcare providers? We have seen in other states already the impact these bans have on our healthcare professionals. When we put them in a difficult situations where they have to decide between what is best for their patients and protecting themselves from legal action or losing their license they often times will just leave and go work in another state. When we start losing our much needed healthcare professionals, womens live will be at risk as well as their pregnancies, thus jeopardizing the very lives Governor Reynolds claims to want to protect.
07-10-2023
Alan Carpenter []
CON
Iowa has been in decline since the 1930s. We had 11 Electoral College votes in 1940 and they were not cast for FDR. When I was a kid, we could fish and swim the Wapsi and today, it is little more than an open sewer of raw pig poop, topsoil, and chemicals. Iowa poisons the Mississippi River to the dead zone in the Gulf of Mexico. Our bright energetic innovative grads run like hell for liberal urban states where they help to build our technological economy. At the same time we slash social services so our PTSD vets, mentally and physically disabled, our homeless families, our runaway teens, and our addicts are forced to flee to those states because the troglodytes in charge here would gladly let them die. And, now you want to impose YOUR religion on me with this truly disgusting legislation. The Supreme Court demands you accommodate sincerely held religious beliefs and my religion endorses the right of a woman to control her body. The state cannot prevail in the age of thug football coaches praying in public in spite of Jesus's admonition to pray alone. So, continue the spiral into fascism, we'll see you in court.
07-10-2023
Dawn Willging [None]
CON
Lawmakers,I am prochoice because:1. A woman should never be forced to give birth. Taking away this fundamental right is a human rights violation to the extreme. 2. I know several women who NEEDED to terminate pregnancies for their own health. Prioritizing a potential life over a current life is NOT prolife. 3. I was once sexually assaulted and if I was forced to give birth to my attackers offspring, I would have chosen suicide. It was hard enough to recover from the trauma without thinking I was perpetuating a gene pool from a violent, horrible person. Plus carrying a potential life conceived without my consent. My 19 year old mind would have had a mental breakdown. 4. I had a high school friend raped by her halfbrother. She could have a 40 year old son and halfnephew at 15 years old. This is not not NOT ok. But based on your position, it seems to be. Explain how that is prolife for raped 15 year old. RAPED against her will. 15! Child who likely would be mentally impaired forever. Your actions are not prolife, they really are proforced birth. As a last reason: Your Christian beliefs are yours. Not mine. Jewish and other religions do not hold the same views. Your God is not everyones God. Separation of church and state may not be your favorite fundamental principle of the US, but it is still there. Stop trying to force women to give birth. Work on what Iowa really needs: education, strong jobs and rural economic development. May you realize you are making the state a tool of right wing extremist groups, beg for forgiveness and get back to the work Iowans need you to do.
07-10-2023
Linda R Jones [Self ]
CON
Please consider ALL Iowa constituents when considering this bill. Medical professionals should be consulted & required to speak in a public format prior to voting on this. Legislators are not scientific or medical experts. Each pregnancy is unique & never can a law be written to cover every possible scenario for women. The deeply personal decision should be made by the woman involved. Her physician must advise based on medical knowledge. The government has no place being involved in the reproductive rights of women. This was & is settled law.
07-10-2023
Odessa Pham [True LIFE of North Iowa ]
PRO
My mother was pressured to have an abortion but chose life for me.
07-10-2023
Janet Norris []
CON
A person & their doctor should be the only people making decisions about their own body, not the state, not the government. Women need the ability to have an abortion for multiple reasons, some as basic as whether the mother lives or dies. VOTE NO on the fetal heartbeat bill. Six weeks is not enough time to know whether you you are pregnant or not and women who develop complications during pregnancy need choices.
07-10-2023
Linda Jones [Personal Card]
CON
Please consider ALL Iowa constituents when considering this bill. Medical professionals should be consulted & required to speak in a public format prior to voting on this. Legislators are not scientific or medical experts. Each pregnancy is unique & never can a law be written to cover every possible scenario for women. The deeply personal decision should be made by the woman involved. Her physician must advise based on medical knowledge. The government has no place being involved in the reproductive rights of women. This was & is settled law.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Citizen]
CON
Please do not enact this bill which the majority of Iowans (your constituents) disagree with. Keep your hands off of women's health. The current Iowa Republican party is not the party I supported for most of my voting life.This is merely a political stunt for Governor Reynolds to raise her national profile. You will pay for this insanity in the 2024 general election.
07-10-2023
LINDA M SCHNEIDER []
CON
NO! Women deserve better! Having the government legislate who makes decisions on the control of their bodies is just wrong. Doctors, women and their families should decide what is best in this area.There are no laws for male reproduction, so why just women? I thought the governor and the legislature trusted Iowans with decisions for parents' rights. Apparently, not with abortion and family decisions.Put it on the ballot instead and let Iowans decide!
07-10-2023
Rachel Henning []
CON
I oppose any attempts at prohibiting and restricting abortions. The majority of people in our state and in our nation don't support prohibiting and restricting abortions. Such a law will not stop abortions from happening only make them less safe. It will also make things less safe for those who are or wish to become pregnant as laws like this scare off obgyns. Our State is already suffering from having too few of these doctors, especially in rural areas. A law like this will only make things worse.There is also a question of the suffering those who miscarry through no fault of their own will have to endure. There are all too many stories on reputable publications of women forced to suffer and nearly die because hospitals are afraid of running afoul of abortion laws. This is not something we should inflict on future generations. For these and many other reasons I urgently ask lawmakers to oppose and vote against this legislation.
07-10-2023
Natalie Gustin []
CON
This governing body is supposed to represent the will of the people. You were elected to advocate on behalf of us to the government. You were given power as a privilege in order to have the voices of your state heard. It is your responsibility, then, to listen to Iowans when we say that this bill will do irreparable damage to the women of Iowa. By banning abortion, you are telling women that their physical health, mental health, happiness, dreams, and lives don't matter to you. You are telling women that you prioritize party lines over women's lives. You're telling victims of rape that you care more about controlling their bodies than you do helping them heal. Please, please, please listen to the people you represent.
07-10-2023
Lyn countryman [Individual]
CON
I am writing as an older female who has lived all her life in Iowa. Although I am past childbirth age, I like many other females have had a spontaneous abortion, more commonly known as miscarriage. Although this is something unavoidable, Laws such as HSB 255 put limits on the freedom, health, and future and are written to restrict womens feminine healthcare. This affects half the population. I also had a friend who was raped. Should she have kept that baby born of violence? Think carefully now in this session what you choose to do. Taking womens healthcare decisions away, puts them back in the dark ages. How would men feel if their health care was curtailed? Testicular issues. Sorry you cant do anything as that would prevent you from having more children.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Private citizen]
CON
While the exceptions in this bill for life of mother, fetal anomalies, and rape/incest, are honorable, banning abortion at 6 weeks takes away liberty and freedom in the realm of family planning from Iowans. The government should not be making family planning decisions for it's citizens, nor is the government capable of making a better decision than the parents in consultation with their health care providers.This proposal for a 6 week ban on abortion, when many do not even know they are pregnant and when healthcare providers will not even see the patient to confirm pregnancy until 8 to 12 weeks is draconian,will cost taxpayers more in medical bills or foster care bills, and make the state less attractive to women in the workforce. There is no reason for it when a 20 week ban balances protecting the mother and the fetus, and provides ample time for parents to make informed decisions.
07-10-2023
Cindy Smith [Concerned female Iowan ]
CON
Im opposed to Kim and crony Republicans taking away womens rights to health care. None of them are medical doctors or even close. How condescending of them to think they know what is best for females. Keep abortion legal and safe for Iowans!!!
07-10-2023
Robert Pentuic []
CON
State abortion bans always fail. The only succeed in banning safe abortions, meaning people would otherwise live full lives are forced into dangerous, underthetable abortions. This ban is an affront to logic, safety, health, and liberty.
07-10-2023
Charles Wishman [Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIO]
CON
The Iowa Federation of Labor, AFLCIO opposes this legislation that seeks to drastically curtail the rights of women to choose their own health care along with their doctor. This legislation is sometimes called a sixweek abortion ban. In reality, a sixweek ban limits care to only four weeks after conception, and only one or two weeks maximum, from when a person could find out they are pregnant. These limits put the patient to one or possibly weeks to make a difficult and personal decision, for them to find childcare, take off work, and find the money to pay for the procedure to name a few obstacles.There are countless examples of women who carry a nonviable pregnancy, and a sixweek ban puts their lives in danger, and can have incredibly heartbreaking and sad after effects for the pregnancy as well. Ultimately, these decisions should be between pregnant people and their doctors and health care providers, not politicians who know nothing to very little about each Iowans health status and conditions. As a result of this legislation, if it becomes law, women will be harmed, or worse. There are few absolutes in life, and respectfully, this is no exception. Every health care decision has many variables in it, no matter what it is. Let patients decide, not the government, to have the freedom to make one of the most important and difficult decisions that one can make.
07-10-2023
Dave Martin []
CON
Politicians have no business interfering with the health care of women. Pass policies that improve people's lives and strengthens their freedoms. Over 60% of Iowa voters oppose this bill. Listen to the voters.
07-10-2023
Sharon Treloar []
CON
Decisions concerning whether to continue a pregnancy are rightly made by the pregnant person with the advice of their medical team, at least until viability. Our current law allows for this. Most women do not know they are pregnant at six weeks, and this is an unreasonable expectation. Our state is already short on proper ob/gym care, and this bill, with its vague exceptions, will make matters worse, as doctors are torn between providing proper care for those with complications, and not running afoul of the law. Since sixtyone percent of Iowans support the right to an abortion, please represent the people of the state, and do not pass this bill.
07-10-2023
Beth Allin []
CON
There is absolutely no place for government in healthcare decisions. The government should not be able to dictate reproductive care for women in the state of Iowa. I am strongly opposed to this bill.
07-10-2023
Susan R. Johnson []
CON
I am a retired obstetriciangynecologist who practiced in Iowa coincidentally the just Roe was enacted. I have personally seen the agony caused by unintended pregnancy and am too familiar with the ways in which such a pregnancy can change the trajectory of a woman or girl's life for the worse. I know that the rate of abortion will not go down and that the rate of unsafe abortion will go up. It's not just through my experience that I know these things, but from the vast amount of research that documents these effects. "Most Iowans" do NOT want abortion to be banned or severely limited because most Iowans want the best for their partners, daughters, and actually all the women and girls they know. Defeat this bill.
07-10-2023
Seeta L Mangra-Stubbs []
CON
At six weeks, what might be detectable within a uterus is an embryonic flutter, not a fetal heartbeat.I point out this fact because I want those in favor of this bill to know they are being emotionally manipulated. Instead of falling victim such a tactic, I ask you consider four more facts. Not statistics. Not language that tugs at your heartstrings. Indisputable facts. Fact one: At six weeks, a pregnant person may not know they are pregnant.Fact two: At six weeks, a pregnancy is not necessarily developed enough to determine if an embryo has "a fetal abnormality."Fact three: Pregnancyrelated "medical emergencies" occur at all stages of pregnancy. Fact four: Giving birthby choice or by forceendangers the lives of pregnant people.These facts prove how flawed the language in this bill is. This legislation will not protect life; it will endanger life. It endangers the lives of pregnant people denied access to standard, common, safe, normal medical care. By proxy, it endangers what supporters of this bill call the life of the unborn. In no way does this proposed legislation protect, save, or care for life. Moreover, this proposed legislation violates individual liberty, specifically bodily autonomy.I want to close with a story relevant to that last point. When I was a kid growing up in Iowa, I learned being conservative meant small government and protecting liberty. Somewhere along the line, that changed. Im asking the conservatives who created and who support this bill to return to their roots.I cannot imagine anything more anticonservative than politicians forcing their morals into the uteruses of individual Iowans. I cannot understand the demand that mandatory vaccines are a violation of bodily autonomy but forced birth is not. I do not grasp how legislators can live with their proposed government overreach let alone their inconsistent morality especially where human lives are concerned. Unless, of course, legislators are finally willing to admit that this proposed legislation has nothing to do with protecting life. It is about controlling women and trans folks.
07-10-2023
Marc Hollander []
CON
Abortion must be legal in the state of Iowa. Do not deny Iowa women ready access to health care and infringe upon their body autonomy.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The right to make a decision about my body is my right whether I am for abortion or against abortion. Government is NOT to be making this decision for me...and in particular, men? What are we? In the dark ages? If this is should be the case, then a bill should be passed making it a right to force a man to be circumcised.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
No one should decide what a woman can do,any person who is against abortion should be required to adopt a child that is already an orphan
07-10-2023
07-10-2023
Evaler [Mickey]
CON
I am a prolifer but I do not believe I should vote to stop all abortions of others who have to make very difficult decisions at a crucial time in r their life. I am very much opposed to putting medical people in positions of possible detriment when they know that if they perform an abortion for the health of the mother, they can jeopardize their practice.
07-10-2023
Allison Kremer [Self]
CON
An abortion, ban in Iowa will kill women! Our governors agenda is not the agenda of Iowans! Kim Reynolds is not a physician, and should not be making healthcare decisions for the people of Iowa! The best thing our governor could do to prevent unintended, pregnancies and abortions is to increase contraception access and reproductive counseling!!
07-10-2023
Patti Jakoubek [self]
CON
This bill DOES NOT allow parents to make decisions regarding their children, as espoused continuously by Kim Reynolds and the Republicans in the Iowa Legislature. This law violates the privacy of a medical patient with their doctor. There is no reason to make medical decisions political and a matter of control. Please just stop!
07-10-2023
James Edelen []
CON
I am against any heart beat bill. I am against this special session. Abortion should remain legal. It is a health care decision made between a woman and her doctor.
07-10-2023
Patricia Benson, RN, BSN, MA [NA]
CON
The majority of Iowans support reproductive freedom, which includes the right to decide to have an abortion. Politicians should not practice medicine without a license. There are many reasons for a medically safe abortion, too numerous to list here. Until you investigate each reason, there should be no all encompassing law made restricting abortion. No biological male should make a decision regarding an abortion since it is a biological female's body that is affected by abortion. Prolife must include adequate and cost effective medical coverage & child support for pregnant persons & their offspring from the time of conception through age 18. Until those services and protections are in place, abortion should not even be discussed, let alone legislated.
07-10-2023
Patricia Hopes []
CON
Please let women make their own decisions about their own bodies. Six weeks is way too early to even know if you are pregnant. What was wrong with 20 weeks? Stop meddling in someone elses personal decisions. You are not God.
07-10-2023
Judith Schmidt [St. Luke's Methodist Church]
CON
I oppose the "6 wk" abortion bill that Republicans plan to pass this. week because it does not follow sciencif hasic knowledge. First of all, science research has shown that there is no fetus heart develped at 6 weeks. The fetus heart, according to scientific research, dies not register a beat until 11 or 12 weeks. 12 weeks is also when the fetus organs begin to develop.A woman doesn't even know if she is pregnant at 6 weeks ; 12 wks is when most women affirm that they are pregnant or not, not 6 wks. Of course, even at 12 weeks, there has to be exceptions for health (mental and physicall) of mother, for rape or incest, for severe development problems with the fetus, etc. If either the 6 week or 12 week abortion bill is passed, the Legislation also needs to increase money for food programs, increase insurance help, increase money for day care, and other social progrmans. In order to make sound decisions, legislature members need to follow scientific facts and not just faith stories.
07-10-2023
Paula Nelson [NA]
CON
A woman's right to reproductive freedom should never be taken away from her. Her medical procedures should be between her and her doctor.
07-10-2023
The Rev. Christopher Marlin-Warfield []
CON
Abortion is healthcare. The decision of whether to receive an abortion is a matter for a woman, her physician, her conscience, and anyone else who she chooses to include in that decision. It is not a matter for the legislature, which does not have the expertise or the empathy to sit with a woman through what is often a heartwrenching decision involving variable that the legislature can scarcely imagine.If you want to lower the number of abortions in Iowa, it would be better to spend your time making sure that women have the resources that they need for pregnancy (and pregnancyprevention), childbirth, and childraising: investing in quality sex education, making birthcontrol more accessible, providing pre and postnatal care, and so on. Restricting abortion does nothing more than make life harder for women and their families.
07-10-2023
Brooke Patterson []
CON
Abortion access is essential healthcare and must be protected. I, along with the majority of Iowans support access to safe and legal abortion in the state of Iowa.This bill is in direct opposition to the will of the people of Iowa and will do grave harm to the health and liberty of women in the state.I believe the decision to continue or end a pregnancy is one that must be made by a woman in discussions with those she trusts, including her physician, family and faith leaders, not by politicians. Therefore, I see HSB 255 as unnecessary and harmful political interference in a private medical and health decision. Iowa already has many barriers in place making abortion, difficult, and HSB 255 moves the needle even further towards severely restricting abortion. I hope that the Iowa legislature will consider the severe ramifications on the health of women of the state of Iowa and vote NO on HSB 255.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Student at the University of Iowa]
CON
A sixweek ban is, effectively, a complete ban on abortion. In order for women to be equal to men, they must have the right to decide for themselves what happens in and to their bodies. No level of government should be deciding for women what happens in their bodies. Men would not tolerate this level of instrusion into their personal affairs. Why should women?
07-10-2023
Anna Ver Ploeg [Self]
CON
This bill will harm the women of Iowa. It takes away health care right from a whole class of the population.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Private Citizen ]
CON
I strongly support keeping safe abortion procedures legal in Iowa, as is the current status.
07-10-2023
Ann Zerkel []
CON
HSB 255 is unconstitutional.This special session is a farce.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am against the ban on abortions for many reasons, but mostly the state needs to stay out of womens reproductive health care. Abortions need to be legal thereby being safe. They will always be abortions, and therefore safety is the of the utmost . consideration. The majority of Iowans do not want an abortion ban.
07-10-2023
Cecilia Norris []
CON
I strongly oppose HSB255. As a physician, studies and outcomes are very important to me. More restrictive abortion policies are associated with higher maternal mortality rates, lower economic wellbeing for women, and more children in poverty. Abortion rates were DECREASING in Iowa before the Republican policies cut funding for Planned Parenthood, resulting in an over 30% increase in abortions in the state. Instead of implementing policies which has been shown to work, most of our Iowa government has chosen to blindly follow the instructions of their big money donators instead of listening to educated, thoughtful people and the will of Iowans. I encourage you to leave the practice of medicine to trained providers, vote "no" on HSB 255, and work to make Iowa a healthier state.
07-10-2023
Christine Rohret []
CON
Listen to Iowans! We want reproductive freedoms.Do NOT vote for abortion bill tomorrow!Chris Rohret
07-10-2023
Ann Haugland []
CON
I am trying to understand how we have come to this place. All (or almost all) of my adult life (born in 1952), I've been confident that every woman had an unquestioned right to make decisions about her body, her choice of when or if to start a family. That right was hardwon, and I am in awe of the women and men who fought for it, for the dignity of women's lives. I remember reminding my daughter that she should not take it for grantedbut actually, I thought the fact that she and others of her generation really didn't think much about it was evidence of how far we had come in my lifetime. Now I am horrified by the loud cruel intolerant, ignorant (of the reality of women's lives) singleminded relentless efforts to go back to ... to what? Women narrowing their futures, forced to maintain pregnancies they did not choose, in some cases facing death or serious medical complications? Please please please stopthe women of Iowa don't want this law. Why? Who benefits from this? It's not the citizens of Iowa
07-10-2023
bruce larson [ ]
CON
strongly against
07-10-2023
Anonymous [NA]
CON
The decisions regarding abortion are a medical issue that should be between the physicians and their patient. They should be able to come to the best possible decision for all concerned based on the best medical information.The State has no standing nor expertise to impose rules that polling shows are opposed by a majority of Iowans.This overreach should be recognized for what it is and be quickly dismissed as a basic threat to our democracy.
07-10-2023
Amber Gustafson [Personal Interest]
CON
Like the majority of Iowans, I strongly oppose this plan to take away the human rights of half our citizens because of a minoritys skewed view of their religious beliefs. I feel as though my public comments are futile as our legislators and governor are hellbent on passing this disastrous piece of legislation to attract the attention of the far right donor class and extreme, outoftouch presidential candidates.We can only hope that the voters dole out the consequences for this disgusting affront to the civil rights of those who call Iowa home. Please vote no.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [individual]
CON
I urge all members of the Iowa legislature to vote against the bill being rushed through in the special session.The Iowa Supreme has already ruled against the fetal heartbeat bill and the majority of Iowans do not support it either.Remember you are there to represent the people not to simply rubber stamp the Governor.
07-10-2023
Ashley Kuse [N/A]
CON
Politicians, with no medical degree, have no business dictating terms of medical care. This is practicing medicine without a license. Further, the first amendment establishes the right to a separation between church and state. A religion, and religious beliefs, should not be dictating laws. What happens medically with each human should be between that human and their doctors. Period.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This bill actively and purposely harms the health and safety of women and their families. Removing an individuals right and full autonomy to decide what is best for the health of the mother and her family. Government has place in family planning these hard decisions should in be between the pregnant individual and their physician.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
People should have the choice to their bodies. Prohibiting an act such as abortion is taking away a human right to ones body. Therefore, creating a bill banning abortions is not only an offense to human rights, but an offense to ones own right over ones body.
07-10-2023
Amy barr []
CON
Abortion is health care. It is not the government 's right to dictat health care between a woman and her doctor. NONE of your business
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I volunteer as a clinic escort and have walked numerous patients to the clinic door and comforted them as they were being verbally harassed by antiabortion protestors. I have seen firsthand the outright lies that these antiabortion protestors spew about abortion and medical care, their demand that everyone around them submit to their personal belief system, and their completely hypocritical and insincere insistence that they "care about" these patients, despite the fact they are actively trying to deny them bodily autonomy and are willing to intimidate, judge, and harass them for seeking care not unlike what Kim Reynolds wants to do with this bill. Every patient I have seen has made the decision that was best for them, none of them expressed being unsure about/regretting their decision, and all of them were extremely thankful that they were able to access the safe and necessary care that this bill is attempting to severely limit if not entirely ban. I oppose HSB 255, I firmly support every pregnant person's right to selfdetermination, and I sincerely urge you all to do the same.
07-10-2023
Geoff Love [Iowan]
CON
The decisions regarding abortion are a medical issue that should be between the physicians and their patient. They should be able to come to the best possible decision for all concerned based on the best medical information.The State has no standing nor expertise to impose rules that polling shows are opposed by a majority of Iowans.This overreach should be recognized for what it is and be quickly dismissed as a basic threat to our democracy.
07-10-2023
Kelvin Sederburg []
CON
I am a lifelong citizen of Iowa, a former Marine Corps Officer, retired actuary, Sunday School teacher, Elder in my church, and Christian.Please do not vote to enact restrictions on abortions in Iowa.Please protect reproductive rights.Decisions regarding whether or not to terminate a pregnancy are the most personal anyone can make, and belong in the hands of the individual, NOT the government.Further, a fetal heartbeat trigger may not allow some individuals enough time to realize a pregnancy has occurred and secure access to medical resources. I fear a return to back alley abortions.Finally, other states which have enacted such restrictions have experienced an exodus of OBGYN and prenatal care physicians. Access to such services for individuals seeking to have a child is limited, especially in rural areas.I also ask you to consider the following points: Religious freedom means every person has the right to their own religious beliefs but can never misuse religion to infringe on the rights of others. Many Iowans of faith believe in the right to access safe and legal abortion because of their faith. One religious belief should never be inserted into public policy and allowed to take away anyone elses rights.The right to an abortion is supported by an overwhelming majority of Americans, including Iowans. * 61% of Iowans including Republicans, Democrats, and Independents support access to safe and legal abortion. Abortion is overwhelmingly safe. Abortion is common. One in four women who are able to get pregnant will have an abortion at some point. Abortion is essential health care, a constitutional right, and a human right. Abortion remains safe and legal in Iowa for now. But its hanging by a thread and politicians in power are working hard to take away our rights for their political gain. Any ban or restriction on abortion is harmful and takes away Iowans abilities to control their body and future. No one else can know a persons situation their health, wellbeing, risks, and future. Abortion is a deeply personal decision. Every person deserves the right to control their reproductive health, and their future. Politicians should not put themselves in the middle of Iowans health care or their decisions. Never before has a governor called a special session to advance a political agenda. A ban on the rights of Iowans is all about politics. Calling a special session in the middle of summer for the sole purpose of stripping Iowans of the liberties they prize is not only unprecedented but shows the drastic lengths powerhungry politicians will take to pass deeply unpopular policies. Iowans are raising their voices and holding their elected officials accountable for every vote they take to limit our rights and bodily autonomy. Regardless of our personal beliefs, we can all agree Iowans deserve the right to control their futures and access reproductive health care.Please keep abortions legal in Iowa.Sincerely,Kelvin Sederburg
07-10-2023
Rebecca A Kresowik []
CON
Iowa women have had the right to make decisions about their own bodies for most of the last 50 years, beginning when I was in high school. To think that Iowa legislators would now take that away is unbelievable. As a nurse, a mother of two IA daughters and four IA granddaughters, I am concerned for what this means for them and all Iowa women. To think they will have less rights than I had through my childbearing years is unjust and plain wrong. Over 60 percent of Iowans and 70 percent of Iowa women believe abortion should be legal. This law could be dangerous for all pregnant women. This law could affect women who suffer miscarriages after 6 weeks or women who are given terrible news regarding a wanted pregnancy. This law will not encourage women to stay in Iowa after they are educated at our colleges and universities when neighboring states provide reasonable reproductive care. Vote for womens right to abortion. Vote NO.
07-10-2023
Eileen Fisher []
CON
Healthcare decisions should between a woman and her doctor.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
Stop stripping human rights away from Iowa citizens. The GOP and Kim Reynolds have no idea what they are talking about when it comes to this bill. Please do not leave our health care decisions in their hands. Only people involved in these types of decisions should be the patient and healthcare professionals.
07-10-2023
Mandi Remington [Corridor Community Action Network]
CON
Iowans overwhelmingly support reproductive freedom, because we know that maintaining the fundamental right to make decisions about our own bodies is essential to our health and wellness. Healthcare is complex and deeply personal, and it is therefore crucial that we respect the diverse experiences, circumstances, and choices that people face when it comes to their reproductive care. No one can fully understand another persons situation their health, needs, risks, and future. I write today as a deeply concerned constituent, to express my complete and absolute opposition to the proposed legislation that aims to outlaw abortion in our state. It is not the role of policymakers to pick and choose when it is acceptable for someone to have a medical procedure. As our elected representatives, I implore you to carefully consider the implications of such a measure and the significant impact it would have on the lives of countless individuals and families in our community. As a mother and an advocate, this legislation terrifies me. I know that comprehensive reproductive services, including safe and legal abortion, play a critical role in ensuring that people have control over their own bodies, futures, and choices. I urge you to stand on the right side of history by protecting and upholding Iowans' reproductive freedoms. It is critical that you consider the farreaching consequences of restricting access to safe and legal abortion and prioritize the safety and autonomy of your constituents. Calling a special session in the middle of summer, solely for the purpose of stripping Iowans of their cherished liberties, is not only unprecedented, but also demonstrates the extreme lengths some powerhungry politicians are willing to go to pass deeply unpopular policies. It is clear this move is driven by political motivations rather than genuine concern for Iowans. I implore you not only to vote against any and all attempts to restrict our reproductive rights, but also to use your platforms and influence to advocate for comprehensive reproductive healthcare, including safe and legal abortion services. We need all of you to join the fight to ensure that every person in Iowa has the freedom to make decisions about their own bodies, without political interference.
07-10-2023
Diana Nordboe []
CON
You will drive young professionals out of Iowa with this bill. Young women will be afraid to live here. When young women leave, young men will follow. Other states that have passed similar legislation are losing their OB/GYN doctors and other health professionals forcing rural women to drive great distances to receive maternity care and increasing pregnancy health risks for the mother and the baby. You are showing distain and extreme cruelty toward women. The vast majority of Iowans do not support this legislation. How about listening to the voters for a change?
07-10-2023
Martin Lohrmann [ ]
CON
As a Christian minister, I am against the proposal to place new limits on abortion for three main reasons. First, I know many women who have been assaulted. I have seen firsthand that is extremely difficult for survivors and challenging for law enforcement to address these occurrences in timely ways. This adds a cruel additional burden to survivors of sexual assault. Second, I also know many women who have ended pregnancies for serious, legitimate medical reasons. Reducing womens opportunities to make informed medical choices is unnecessary and dangerous. Women and their health care providers should be free to continue making safe choices about their health. Third, this attempt to make a law out of some peoples personal antiabortion views is unconstitutional and offensive to democratic principles and values. We need to protect peoples right to choose what is best for them, even if we might not personally or religiously agree with such choices.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
We need to keep abortion SAFE and legal in the state of Iowa. The Governor and the GOP need to stop using our state as a launching pad for White House dreams. We don't need to be the extreme in every situation just for TV time. Keep religion out of politics. Abortion is healthcare.
07-10-2023
Michael Bayer []
PRO
I strongly support the effort to protect babies after a heartbeat can be detected. This bill does not go far enough to protect babies. A baby is a unique individual from the moment of conception and should be protected from that time on. The exceptions in this bill for rape and incest are not logical. As tragic as the circumstances of the conception may be, the value of a baby is not defined by its father. It is still worth protecting regardless of who the father may be. I also believe that the state of Iowa should provide assistance to mothers who have unwanted pregnancies and should encourage and provide assistance for families wishing to adopt children. Please consider amending the bill to remove the exceptions for rape and incest.Please vote to pass this bill. Thank you.
07-10-2023
Myranda Hadley []
CON
If passed, this bill would take away the fundamental rights of women and harm more Iowans than what you intend to help. Healthcare is a right and we need to consider the wellbeing and choice of the woman in these scenarios as well. This is entirely too restrictive to be helpful and should not be allowed to move forward. If you want to prevent abortions, the way to do it is through education and access to contraception and health care, not through restrictions places on female bodies. This will only harm those who can't afford to go elsewhere for services and support.
07-10-2023
Phillip Timmerman []
CON
If this legislation was actually pro life the state of Iowa would have a more robust network of social programs to help new families and better Healthcare and daycare opportunities. Pro life until the individual is born is what the Iowa GOP is saying with everything going on.
07-10-2023
Zoe [NARAL Pro-Choice America]
CON
I oppose this bill from the bottom of my heart!! As a woman in Iowa this is scary and I dont agree with our rights being taken away. You never know the circumstances and this is black and white thinking. Its ignorant and makes me horrified for my future and the future of my own daughters. As well as the future and well being of all females living in iowa. A bill as absurd as this one is enough for people to leave Iowa and not trust their government has their best interest in mind. Please do not pass this abortion ban, please oppose HSB 255!!!
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This law and special session are nonsensical. Most women aren't aware of a pregnancy until AT LEAST 8 weeks, when a missed period would be. There is zero birth control methods that are 100% effective.Additionally, there is no rationale basis for this law. Republicans, you can't talk out of both sides of your mouth saying the government should not be in charge of personal medical decisions (looking at you vaccines) but then, when a woman is a vessel for a fetus you feel it is your place to make medical decisions?Although I know my representatives will not represent me in this matter, I felt it important that my voice be heard.I am a woman. I am a mother. NO ONE should be making medical decisions for me, except for me.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The majority of Iowans believe that abortion is a private decision between a woman and her medical provider. HSB 255 is not what Iowan's want. HSB 255 significantly increases medical disparity of Iowans, increasing the healthcare risks of African American women, minorities and all underage young women. What government would require a 10 year old to carry a pregnancy full term? Pregnancy is NOT a government decision it is a woman's decision. Please vote Con for HSB 255.Thank you
07-10-2023
Patricia Benson, RN, BSN ,MA [NA]
CON
The majority of Iowans support reproductive freedom, which includes the right to decide to have an abortion. Politicians should not practice medicine without a license. There are many reasons for a medically safe abortion, too numerous to list here. Until you investigate each reason, there should be no all encompassing law made restricting abortion. No biological male should make a decision regarding an abortion since it is a biological female's body that is affected by abortion. Prolife must include adequate and cost effective medical coverage & child support for pregnant persons & their offspring from the time of conception through age 18. Until those services and protections are in place, abortion should not even be discussed, let alone legislated.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [none - citizen]
CON
Vote NO on the abortion bill on Tuesday. Restricting reproductive rights violates a women's right to choose what is best for her and her situation. This is a personal decision for a women, not a decision to be made by legislators. Thank you.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [NARAL Pro Choice America]
CON
As an Iowan, I belive that the government should not have any power to make medical decisions regarding a woman's body. The decision to terminate a pregnancy should rest with a woman, her partner and her doctor. Please vote no to HSB 255.
07-10-2023
Mary Lynch []
CON
I do not support HSB 255. Multiple surveys show that the majority of Iowans do not support further restrictions on abortion.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The government shouldn't be making healthcare decisions for anyone. There are many medical reasons abortions need to be legal, many women will die when forced to keep an inviable pregnancy going where the fetus will not survive. This should a discussion only made by the patient and their doctor, who is the expert and can give advise specific to each situation instead of making it blanket answer that will just cause unnecessary deaths.
07-10-2023
07-10-2023
Jerry Uhlman [Retired]
CON
Studies show the action taken by Republican legislatures over the past few decades has only made matters worse. Polly CarverKimm was fired for letting the cat out of the bag in Iowa and recent studies from the University of Washington show a drastic increase in maternal mortality in all womens groups but Black and Native American in particular. Taking away funds from honest organizations like Planned Parenthood, restricting sex education in schools, restricting access to birth control for young girls, morning after medication, and a long list of other actions has only made for the need more abortions. The infant mortality rate along with the maternal mortality rate is higher in the US than many third world countries due to the lack of healthcare and prenatal care for young women and expected mothers.Organizations like Planned Parenthood were once able to provide honest care in many parts of rural Iowa. Thanks to legislation passed by Republican legislatures, this is no longer true and Iowa women and families are paying the price.
07-10-2023
Jennifer Turner []
CON
I strongly oppose this bill and I know a large majority of my friends and neighbors do too. We all have the right to control our own bodies and health and this ridiculous bill makes healthcare for pregnancy, which can be very dangerous, less responsive to the needs and decisions of doctors and patients. Will someone who is bleeding out because of miscarriage have to wait for medical care for some legal definition to be met? This could be the difference between life and death, not to mention the many other reasons that reproductive healthcare needs to be between the doctor and patient.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
To the representatives elected to represent the people of the state of Iowa,I stand with a majority of Iowans in our belief that everyone deserves the right to make their own health care decisions, especially when it comes to reproductive care and abortion. Kim Reynolds is putting her own interests over the interests of her constituentsbut you still have the opportunity to stand in opposition of this shameful abuse of power, and to stand WITH the people of Iowa.I demand reproductive freedom for all Iowans, and ask you do the same. Abortion is HEALTHCARE and limiting access puts the women of Iowa as well as future generations at an unacceptable risk.Sincerely, An Iowan and mom of three girls
07-10-2023
Charlene Ferguson [NARAL]
CON
I oppose an abortion ban. It takes away the basic freedom of women controlling their own bodies. Very disturbing that anyone would think they know more than the woman herself.
07-10-2023
Gretchen McMahob []
CON
I believe abortion is Healthcare and women deserve equality and privacy with their medical care. I believe if this law passes, OBGYN's will leave the state making birth more dangerous in this state and increase maternal mortality rates. This is bad for Iowans and a regressive law that doesn't represent Iowans opinions.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Self]
CON
Keep abortion safe and legal please. Thank you!
07-10-2023
Rev. Lisa Griffith Tierney [United Church of Christ]
CON
My name is Rev. Lisa J Griffith Tierney, from the Iowa conference of the United Church of Christ with remarks on the issue of reproductive health and freedom for Iowa women. Supporters of this legislation profess that they support life, while they smother the spirits and limit the potential of women, citizens of the state of Iowa, with their narrow definitions and narrow minded efforts to take away their freedom, power and autonomy over their own bodies. The purpose of this special session of legislation is driven by this state's highest office to oppose the split ruling of the Iowa Supreme Court because this governor didn't get what she wanted. She is playing politics with Iowans lives. She does not care about Iowa women. I am a barren woman and the adoptive mother of two terrific, beautiful and perfect children. Abortion would not have been a choice I would have made. I do not support abortion as the first or best option for birth control. But that doesn't give me the right to control another woman's choice any more than it's the governor's right to force or restrict Iowa women's choices for reproductive health. Therefore, I DO support a woman's right to make her own choices regarding her reproductive health and maintain that all women should have the freedom to choose for herself based on her own liberty and circumstances. By design, God created the first lives and bestowed the human with the freedom to make her own choices and to follow her own journey with the intention that each would live fully into the best parts of themselves and for the glory of God. God has always condemned the efforts of one or many to control or suppress the freedom, choices and decisions of others. It is not the role of this governor or legislature to control the freedom of women or their agency. We cannot assume the course of someone else's journey for them. By removing the right to reproductive freedom from women, we also limit God's potential to do redemptive and salvific work with and thru her on her journey AND we obstruct her right to freedom to choose what is best for her in her unique circumstances. Life is precious. A woman's life is precious. Entrusting Iowa women with choices about how to live her life further validates and affirms her life. Too many women have already given their bodies and their lives to the cause of reproductive freedom.Furthermore, we know that God inspires the wisdom, healing and skills of our doctors and nurses in providing good medical care. Restricting access to abortion as reproductive health care will not reduce unwanted pregnancy. It will, however, roll back the calendar to a time when abortions were performed in back alleys by unqualified practitioners, leading to the horrific suffering, disease and death of women who would have fared better under the care of qualified medical professionals.Countless children's lives already living on this planet are precious. Children who already are dying of hunger, homelessness, war and disease. To take a pro life stand for the unborn while turning a deaf ear to their cries contradicts the gospel of Jesus Christ. We must put our faith back into the trust of God and allow women the freedom to exercise liberty over their own bodies, just as God intended and such that we do not limit or interfere with the possibilities for God's grace in her life. This is a country based and built on freedom for all people. The legislation proposed here limits a woman's God given right to freedom to think for herself and to choose her own health care options. If you support the US Constitution and are truly dedicated to your role as a servant of the people, then you MUST oppose this legislation.
07-10-2023
Michelle Townsend []
CON
I do not want the legislature inserting itself into my healthcare decisions. The legislature is not an effective substitute for me and my healthcare provider. I oppose this bill.
07-10-2023
Patricia Bowen []
CON
Iowans overwhelming support the right to access abortion but this bill will take away the rights of Iowans. Republicans talk big about freedom and rights, yet when it comes to the freedom to control our bodies they are at the opposite end of the spectrum, forcing their own personal agenda on the majority of Iowans(61%) that support access to abortion. Access to abortion should not be denied for many reasons. If you choose to not have an abortion that is your choice. Give others their choice. If you truly do believe this is to protect children, then why is money and support being taken away once the child is born? SNAP. education, child care, welfare and more is being denied. That is not protecting children or their families. Once that child is born you wash your hands of the whole affair. Iowans are compassionate people who value the right to abortion and to make personal, private decisions without politicians interfering. The decision should be the woman/family and their doctor no one else. Please vote NO on this bill and listen to the will of the people of this state.
07-10-2023
Heather Humberg []
CON
I am so disgusted that a special session has been called to yet again try and squash a woman's right to choose. Over 65% of Americans disagree with taking this choice away. A choice that should be made between a woman and her doctor. Ffs, most men don't know female anatomy thanks to our lack of sex education in Iowa. Wealthy white women will still have abortions. This will only affect the poor, and marginalized. Which you don't help as of now anyway. We have a surplus in Iowa. How about spending that money to up the education, WIC, Head Start, Community Action, etc?
07-10-2023
Ker Diedrich [N/A]
CON
The government should not be in charge of a woman's body. The responsibilities of caring for the child ultimately fall on the woman. She should be able to choose whether or not a child is brought into the world by her.
07-10-2023
Noah Gaber [N/A]
CON
The people of Iowa do not want more of these rightsstripping bills. Governor Reynolds has been determined to destroy everything thats made this state a good place. She acts with impunity and with disregard for the intentions and desires of Iowans. Please end the damage here. Dont let this bill move forward.
07-10-2023
Heather Humberg []
CON
I am so disgusted that a special session has been called to yet again try and squash a woman's right to choose. Over 65% of Americans disagree with taking this choice away. A choice that should be made between a woman and her doctor. Ffs, most men don't know female anatomy thanks to our lack of sex education in Iowa. Wealthy white women will still have abortions. This will only affect the poor, and marginalized. Which you don't help as of now anyway. We have a surplus in Iowa. How about spending that money to up the education, WIC, Head Start, Community Action, etc?
07-10-2023
Dr. Nicole Taylor-Irwin [Licensed Psychologist, Private Practice]
CON
As a psychologist who focuses on the mental health needs of the perinatal population, this proposed bill is horrible. Women deserve the right to make their own healthcare decisions at the time that is right for them and their families. Access to abortion is critical for healthy women and families in the state of Iowa.Personally, I have been pregnant 8 times and I now have 2 living children. I experienced 6 miscarriages during my time building my family. During 3 of those miscarriages, my body started bleeding on its own but on the other 3, I required medical intervention. Twice I needed a D and C after taking misoprostol at home. The medication abortions did not work for me. My body did not respond and I had to have surgical abortions. These were to remove much wanted pregnancies that were inviable. One one occasion, I saw a heartbeat but the size of the fetus did not measure accurately. My doctor sent me home to wait for 4 days and then to come back for another ultrasound. When I returned, there was no heartbeat and the clump of cells had not grown any more. It was not a viable pregnancy. According to this bill, I would not have been able to have an abortion at that time. My health was greatly at risk and I began hemorrhaging at home. I would be DEAD today if I had not had access to much needed healthcare! This bill is unacceptable and will not lead to good outcomes in the state. As a mother to two young daughters, we will likely move out of the state of Iowa if this bill passes and continues to ban abortion. This harmful bill will also harm the state economy and vibrancy as young families like mine will leave in droves. I just started a small business and I will move that out of the state as well. The ramifications of this bill have not been considered and will be devastating to our state.I was a proud Iowan for most of my life but this legislative session has made me disgusted by the actions of the republican legislators who are not listening to the desires of the people. PLEASE do not pass this restrictive abortion bill.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
Why are you working towards making your state worse? Why do you want more babies born here. while actively making it harder to get them fed and give them an education? This bill will not only harm each individual household forced to have a child they can't care for, but it will affect schools with a mass amount of students that are now at higher chance of death due to school shootings, or infants who are at a higher rate of death because of disease, lack of pediatrics, and formula shortages. You are setting up children to die, and you will suck every cent from their families. This bill will create nothing but pain and death. You are servants of the people, not dictators. Listen to your constituents.
07-10-2023
Mary Henderson []
CON
Women must be able to make their OWN health care decisions, not the government. It's as simple as that.
07-10-2023
David Rust []
CON
Healthcare for women must include health care. The decision needs to be made in the context of their lives, their family, and their beliefs. This bill takes away their ability to manage their life and their health care.
07-10-2023
Alicia Ambler [Public ]
CON
Iowans deserve bodily autonomy. Its our right.
07-10-2023
Rya Dunnington []
CON
The majority of Americans, and the majority of Iowans do not want this. This bill will be the cause of lost lives, and offer women less autonomy over their bodies than the dead enjoy. Please go back to Iowa's strong roots of fairness, privacy, and human rights.
07-10-2023
Denise O'Brien [none - individual]
CON
61% of Iowans believe that women should have the right to an abortion. Women should have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and should have the right to get a safe, accessible abortion if they want.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Women deserve the right to make their own choices regarding their healthcare. Government should not be placing restrictions on their ability to make the best decisions for themselves and their families. The majority of Iowans do not want this bill to pass. Please do whats best for Iowans and not what the governor demands so she can plant another far right feather in her hat.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Private Citizen]
CON
I side with professionals. Legislators have no business putting their political beliefs in front of MY OWN PERSONAL healthcare needs. You are not taking into account the human lives you will be destroying because you are choosing to follow the politics rather than the professionals. Vote NO to abortion limits and restrictions let the medical professionals and their patients decide what is best for them.
07-10-2023
Pete Clancy []
CON
Don't put politics over medicine.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
This decision should be made between a woman and her medical provider, not lawmakers.
07-10-2023
Kathleen Lane [1952]
CON
I am writing to express my strong opposition to this bill. All people need and deserve access to the full range of reproductive health services including abortion. Banning access to this critical component of healthcare will delay care, keep individuals from seeking followup treatments when needed, and will make clinicians question and put off treatment of a multitude of pregnancy complications (including ectopic pregnancy, which is life threatening) for fear of legal repercussions.There is no "heartbeat" at 6 weeks, as the heart has not developed yet. This is a definition fabricated by the antichoice contingency and not based on medicine or science. This absurd definition will outlaw almost all abortions in our state, as many people do not know they are pregnant until they are past this marker of tissue development.The majority of Iowans support the right to abortion. Individuals deserve to have bodily autonomy and to make medical decisions in consultation with trusted medical staff not via fiat from politicians.
07-10-2023
Christina Bender []
CON
Id love to live in a world with fewer abortions, but restricting womens access to abortion is the wrong way to go about it. Prevention begins with comprehensive sex education, access to birth control, broad based nutritional support for mothers, and a living wage for Iowa workers these things will go a long way toward lowering the need for abortion in Iowa. To restrict abortion access without tending to these factors is shortsighted, cruel, and dangerous to women across the state.
07-10-2023
Tyler Mitchell []
CON
If Iowa is going to force more people to have children they do not want, then the state must invest in a wider safety net. By and large the people who receive abortions are already low income, and now you want to make it even worse by forcing them to have children. Good job, Iowa. Always doing your best to make me want to leave this state.
07-10-2023
jean k Laurila [aAUW-IOWA]
CON
if this is passed women will die because they would not have control of their own body and soul.
07-10-2023
Jennifer Horn-Frasier []
CON
I vehemently oppose this denial of the fundamental right to bodily autonomy.
07-10-2023
Patty Sneddon-Kisting []
CON
In 2019 we were given a not fit for life diagnosis. We chose to carry for as long as we could. We made it to 35 weeks and to a live birth where we were able to meet our son, tell him we loved him, and then send him on his way. While we would make the decision again to carry our son, I would never wish our journey on anyone nor fault them for making a different decision than ours. These decisions should be left up to the individual that is pregnant, their family, and healthcare team.
07-10-2023
Joy Smith [Iowan]
CON
Abortion is health care. The decision about whether to carry a pregnancy to term belongs between a woman, her partner, and her doctor. The government and individuals evangelizing to advance their selfrighteous religious beliefs have no place in these decision. Vote no on HB255. The arrogant efforts of this legislature and governor to impose your minority views on the citizens of this state is heartbreaking and lifethreatening.
07-10-2023
Molly Abraham []
CON
Please vote no on this 6 week abortion ban. This end run on the people of Iowa ignores the majority of Iowans who believe abortion should remain safe and legal.
07-10-2023
Paul goeltz [Retired ]
CON
Its a ladies right not a fake politician
07-10-2023
Roger Beermann []
CON
I recognize some legislators concern more about the unborn's life than the pregnant mothers. I suggest the legislators show their support for their action as follows.1. Any pregnant woman who has passed the fetal heartbeat deadline and is therefore unable to get an abortion shall contact a person delegated by the State of Iowa.2. The person delegated by the State of Iowa shall assign the pregnant woman to a legislator who voted for the bill. A. The assignments to the legislators shall be in the order of their length of service in the legislature regardless of chamber, with the one serving the longest being the first on the list and the legislator serving the least be the last. When the last legislator on the list has received an assignment then the list will go back to the top and process would repeat. There would be a limit of three assignments per legislator.3. The legislator assigned the pregnant woman would be responsible for all of her medical care related to the pregnancy and birth as well as any other expenses related to the pregnancy such as lost wages during and after the pregnancy.4. The legislator shall then take the born child into his family setting and provide for the child until the child's 18th birthday.
07-10-2023
Lisa Correll [Lisa Correll]
CON
I demand reproductive freedom just like most (60% of)Iowans. The legislators and Governor that are supporting this bill do not understand what abortion is for. They think it is a form of birth control when it is a necessary medical procedure yhat saves lives. Unborn children are not the only lives that matter. You don't even believe and it's strong enough to put it up to a vote for aiowans o decide.
07-10-2023
Denise Kleppe []
CON
I do not support restricting abortion access
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Medical Students for Choice]
CON
I am a Special Victims Hospital Advocate for Survivors of Domestic Violence, Sexual Assault, and Human Trafficking, as well as a prior sexual assault survivor.I have personally never had to receive an abortion, but I have held hands with countless women and nonbinary humans who have had to face this decision after a traumatic incident. Never once did I tell them what to do, but instead I was present for the emotional support for the survivor.I have witnessed dozens, if not hundreds, of survivors face the decision to abort or to take an emergency contraceptive and every survivor has been able to make this decision of their own free will, an important freedom that should be allowed in this beautiful country of ours. Some survivors would choose to abort, some would decide to think about it, and some would immediately say no, but all decisions were made based on the survivors thoughts, opinions, and personal beliefs. I would like to emphasize "freedom" in this context and encourage the state of Iowa to please consider allowing women and survivors to continue to have this choice available. Some freedoms that we have in this country are not universally agreed upon, but bans are not placed on these freedoms. To restrict a human being from their freedom is to make one step closer to the ruin of Democracy and I urge this great state to continue to allow choices for those who would like to make their own decisions.
07-10-2023
Jean Ives [Citizen]
CON
Women should be allowed to make any decision about their bodies and medical care.
07-10-2023
Christopher Krebill [N/a]
CON
Iowa lacks the infrastructure and funding to support parents that will be forced to continue pregnancies because of this law. Iowa has not properly funded nor supported parental time off for parents. The same can be said for daycare and after school programs. Governer Reynolds forcing this through will cause Iowa to loose economic standing as parents will be forced to choose whether to work or stay home to raise children. For some still, this will likely lead to being unable to afford housing or food, thus increasing unhoused populations in the state. For a party that cries about constitutional freedoms, Reynolds and her chronies are on a roll to roll back those freedoms for millions of Iowans. Proof that "Iowa nice" is no more.
07-10-2023
timothy garth abrahamson [gdmd]
CON
Please support women's healthcare.The heartbeat rule makes no sense other than to restrict choice. The heart, lungs, and brain are not formed at this point. No infant has survived earlier than 5 months outside the uterus.
07-10-2023
Jordan Bles []
CON
Health care is a human right and should not be determined by governmental policy or fiat. That includes reproductive healthcare, and choices individuals and families make, with their doctors, about what is best for them. It isn't the place for our state government to be making these decisions.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Keep the government out of personal healthcare decisions.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This bill will harm women and I 100% oppose it. Political figures need to stay out of Womens healthcare and their MEDICAL (not political) decisions!
07-10-2023
Lara Parkin [Citizen]
CON
You were not elected to pass bills prohibiting medical doctors from treating their patients. Your vague, illinformed, emotionally driven bill is detrimental to the medical community, and to a citizen's right to make their own difficult and personal medical decisions without government input.
07-10-2023
Katherine Tully [Registered Nurse ]
CON
Reproductive rights are human rights that Governor Reynolds wants to strip away for her own political gain. Meantime, shes also stripping away access to women and children in ways that will negatively impact their lives. She only forcing her beliefs on women to make them have unwanted children, even in the case of rape and incest. Then she abandons them. Shameful and not what Jesus would do. Theres so much hypocrisy with her evangelical base and Trump loving antics. There should be a separation of church and state but unfortunately under Reynolds shes also abandoned the founding doctrines ans principles of the great state of Iowa.
07-10-2023
Robert Pentuic []
CON
State abortion bans always fail. The only succeed in banning safe abortions, meaning people would otherwise live full lives are forced into dangerous, underthetable abortions. This ban is an affront to logic, safety, health, and liberty.
07-10-2023
Pat Copenhaver [NARAL Pro Choice]
CON
A fetal heartbeat is not indicative of life, in and of itself. There needs to be a central nervous system and brainwave activity for life to be present. If, for example, a fetus is removed from the uterus because of injury to the mother, the fetus stands a better chance of surviving on life support than a fetus with little to no brainwave activity. I have watched the news and followed along regarding this issue. To date, I have not seen anything about the need for a central nervous system and/or brain wave activity. This does a disservice to all women seeking an abortion, for whatever reason.
07-10-2023
Allison Uhll [None]
CON
I am against any bill that attempts to legislate an individual's healthcare choices or accessibility. Pregnancy, miscarriage and childbirth are medical issues that belong between a patient and their doctor.
07-10-2023
Roger Beermann []
CON
I recognize some legislators concern more about the unborn's life than the pregnant mothers. I suggest the legislators show their support for their action as follows.1. Any pregnant woman who has passed the fetal heartbeat deadline and is therefore unable to get an abortion shall contact a person delegated by the State of Iowa.2. The person delegated by the State of Iowa shall assign the pregnant woman to a legislator who voted for the bill. A. The assignments to the legislators shall be in the order of their length of service in the legislature regardless of chamber, with the one serving the longest being the first on the list and the legislator serving the least be the last. Whenthe last legislator on the list has received an assignment then the list will go back to the top and process would repeat. There would be a limit of three assignments per legislator.3. The legislator assigned the pregnant woman would be responsible for all of her medical care related to the pregnancy and birth as well as any other expenses related to the pregnancy such as lost wages during and after the pregnancy.4. The legislator shall then take the born child into his family setting and provide for the child until the child's 18th birthday.
Attachment
07-10-2023
Anne K Salamon []
CON
Please do not pass this legislation. It will not stop abortions but just drive them underground. In addition, there is no greater fundamental right than that of having control over one's own body. Over 61% of Iowans feel this way. I had an abortion shortly after college, in a clinical setting. I was headed to grad school and my boyfriend (now husband) and I weren't ready to get married. Since I grew up in a dysfunctional home, the last thing I wanted was to try to raise a(n) (unwanted) child under stressful circumstances. Years later, with stable jobs and a house, we had our much wanted baby. And no, I did not see adoption as a solution. My sister, though, found herself in different circumstances when she became pregnant in the late 60's. Since abortion was illegal, she used a hanger on herself in her dorm room. She successfully ended the pregnancy but at the cost of being hospitalized and almost bleeding to death. Making abortion illegal will not stop it, just drive it underground. In addition, the vagueness of your law with regard to biological systems (there is NO HEART at six weeks it is a cardiac tube, precursor to a heart) means docs will be hesitant to intervene in critical situations, putting the mother's health, even her life, at risk. There are numerous examples of this in the news, to say nothing of the lawsuits that have resulted. And expensive litigation will surely happen if this legislation is passed. If legislators truly wish to "save children's lives", then I suggest you fund school lunches, improve SNAP benefits, provide better funding of childcare for low income families, and increase the minimum wage for working parents. This legislation is meant to appeal to the Republican base and does NOT reflect the will of most Iowans. Pass this legislation and you will be firing up voters who've been in the shadows. Or perhaps our Republican legislators are counting on voter suppression to remedy that?
07-10-2023
Alyssa Palante [n/a]
CON
I am in favor of bodily autonomy and I urge Iowa lawmakers to uphold state Supreme Court precedent by opposing HSB 255 and keeping abortion legal.Over 60 percent of Iowa voters agree with this request no matter how Governor Reynolds spins her agenda. Bottom line: Honor the majority of constituent beliefs and put trust in their ability to decide about their reproductive futures for themselves. Thank you.
07-10-2023
Aislinn Williams []
CON
I am writing in strong opposition to this bill. Bills like this, despite their appearance of deference to medical care, actively harm pregnant people in states where they have been passed. Women have been made seriously ill and nearly died due to bills that prohibit necessary medical care. Iowans do not want this. We want safe, legal, effective access to reproductive health care.
07-10-2023
Raymond Simmons [Acsension Reformed Church , Red Oak IA]
CON
Hello, I respectfully request an opportunity to at the hearing on abortion. I will be driving from Red Oak tomorrow. I am against this bill, but not for the same reason as most who are against it. I can be brief with my comments, but I would like to point out the inconsistency and the unbiblical approach of protecting only babies who are 6 weeks and older. And, I would like to propose a better way. I also am working with pastors in my area who are under the same conviction. Currently, there are four of us who have signed a position statement as protestant pastors. That's a small number, but I've only just started. In other words, there are many pastors in Iowa who believe the same on equal protection. I am also a retired USAF Lt Col and can speak to the application of the constitution to all. Thank you.I will attach the document I mentioned if you are interested. It does not have the signatories besides me, but I can will have that tomorrow. Your fellow minister under King Jesus, Ray Simmons, Pastor, Ascension Reformed Church
Attachment
07-10-2023
Nancy Davin []
CON
I am 63 years old and have had friends who encountered health issues during pregnancy where the fetus had to be evacuated to save the life of the mother, who had to do the same because it was very difficult emotionally to carry a dead fetus until it expelled, who found themselves pregnant (birth control fails) and not ready to be a mother, and some who were not ready financially to be a parent. It is unconscionable that the majority of Iowans (70% is the figure I have heard) are not in favor of this bell, yet our very conservative legislators propose and support this legislation. I have lived here for 61 years and continued proposed legislation such as this will cause me to move in retirement. I can't stand Iowa's politics anymore. What happened to negotiation? What happened to both parties working together for the betterment of Iowans? What happened to the party of small government? Get out of my life.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Woman Centered Health]
CON
Today is another pivotal day in Iowa history where we as a state have the opportunity to massively impact the health of our people. Iowa, especially rural Iowa, is a place that values hard work and responsibility. So I would like to take this opportunity to discuss the concept of responsible sexual behavior and what this means for Iowa women, especially rural women. My name is Dr. Nicole Loew, I am a registered nurse and nurse scientist who has been researching responsible sexual behavior in Iowa women for almost 10 years. It is clear that lawmakers in Iowa are trying to draw a clear line that says abortion is not only an illegal decision but also, irresponsible sexual behavior. In my time researching and meeting with women to learn about their healthcare needs, people need 3 things to exercise responsible sexual behavior: consent, awareness, and access. The first thing people need to exercise responsible sexual behavior is consent. Responsible sexual behavior can only occur in situations where sex is consensual. In the lens of responsibility, this means that in the cases of rape or incest, blaming or holding women responsible is what is irresponsible. However, we have recently seen the Iowa AG rescinding coverage of plan B for rape victims, and we have a history of low prosecution of rapists. This is an example of the state misappropriating responsibility to victims and putting women at risk for irresponsible sexual behavior. The second thing people need to exercise responsible sexual behavior is awareness or competence. That is, individuals must know how the consequences of sexual behavior occur (like pregnancy and STIs) and the knowledge to manage the risks associated with sex. So, responsible sexual behavior requires accurate and comprehensive information about sexual health and methods for pregnancy and STI prevention. However, weakening sex education continues to be a target of Iowa lawmakers which puts women at risk for irresponsible sexual behavior.The third thing people need to exercise responsible sexual behavior is access to resources and services. National, state, and local laws and policies, like those enacted in Iowa that were originally intended to close Planned Parenthoods, influence responsible sexual behavior through control over resource availability and access to services. We have already seen the negative effects of these clinic closures, across the state, again putting women at risk for irresponsible sexual behavior. I am from a rural county and the rural senate district 12 currently represented by Sen Amy Sinclair, and we know that rural areas report lower education, higher rates of unemployment or underemployment, lower salaries, higher rates of poverty, longer travel distances to healthcare facilities, higher rates of uninsured or underinsured people, higher rates of severe intimate partner violence, and increased fear of stigmatization and loss of confidentiality. These are all factors that put women at risk for irresponsible sexual behavior and are all issues impacted by policy. We also know that Iowa ranks last for the number of OB/GYNs per capita, which is worse in rural areas. Twothirds of Iowa counties do not have a single OB, and over 34 maternity units have closed since 2000, my county, Lucas County, being one of them. We already have data to show that following the closures, more expectant mothers arent making an adequate number of prenatal visits resulting in being more likely to deliver prematurely and putting both the baby and parent at higher risk for complications. Rural women are disproportionately feeling the impact of laws that touch sexual and reproductive health issues. I have spoken with rural women who are remaining abstinent until marriage but dont even know how to make an appointment or what their birth control options would be once they are married, a woman who sought an abortion because she didnt have the means to get birth control, their partner refused to wear condoms and was then threatened that if she became pregnant he would throw her down the stairs. I have also talked to multiple women who were told to remain abstinent until marriage even though their parents didnt, and women who genuinely believed that STIs only exist in big cities, not their small rural town. During my quality improvement postdoctoral fellowship, I was trained to look at a problem and ask why at least 5 times. After doing this exercise, I can assure you that women do not get abortions just because abortions are legal and Iowas maternal health crisis isnt because abortions are legal. The best way to stop abortions is to prevent the desire or need for them to begin with. The state of Iowa must recognize the ways in which it is complicit and responsible for causing women to seek abortions or have irresponsible sexual behavior in the first place. At this point banning abortions is like closing down emergency rooms. Just because the emergency room is shut down does not mean people will no longer find themselves in an emergent situation. We need to shift our energy into preventing folks from needing emergency services in the first place. As a state, when we dont do everything to protect victims, when we fight to weaken sex education, and drastically reduce access to resources and services, we cannot reasonably expect women to make sexually responsible decisions if the state of Iowa doesnt give them everything they need in order to be responsible to begin with. Iowa needs to be held more accountable and responsible for abortion, not women. Placing responsibility solely on women is setting them and their families up for failure.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Abortion access is healthcare and is necessary. In a country where the maternal mortality rate threatens the lives of pregnant people, Iowans should have access to life saving measures that abortions provide. Iowans who are able to get pregnant should not have to worry about someone else making medical decisions for them based on their own religious beliefs in a country that claims to have freedom of and from religion. By continuing to strip Iowans of their healthcare access and rights we will continue to neglect women, people of color, the impoverished, and those who love them. I strongly support abortion for all. I am a born and raised Iowan, with both a Bachelors and Masters degree from the University of Iowa, a proud public teacher of history, and a lover of Iowa. I want to stop being ashamed of the state I moved back to. I want to stop considering moving to a more open and accepting state. I want to know that if my birth control fails I have options to protect my future and my health through abortion. I have many loved ones who have had abortions and who have greatly benefitted from that option. Please protect abortion rights.
07-10-2023
Mallory Oppermann []
CON
Abortion is healthcare and those decisions should be left to a woman and her doctor, not the state. As a woman with a young daughter and seven nieces in Iowa, I hope that they are afforded the same rights to make their own healthcare decisions in the future, as we have for the past 50 years.
07-10-2023
Steven Combs []
CON
Protecting access to safe and effective heathcare options is the duty of all Iowans. Choosing what healthcare options make sense for oneself is the right of all Iowas.
07-10-2023
Robin Cushman [Private individual]
CON
Banning abortion is tantamount to saying that there should be a state religion, and that every one should believe as just few folks.Having legal abortion does not force anyone to have an abortion, it just provides people who wants one a safe alternative. This should be decided between a woman and her doctor.
07-10-2023
Betty Warywoda [- Select -]
CON
I stand with Iowans who are opposed to the proposed changes in Iowa's reproductive rights laws that severly restrict abortuion. I stand firmly FOR reproductive freedom and firmly against State interference in a woman's right to chose.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am against banning abortion
07-10-2023
Amelia Bridgford [None / Iowa resident ]
CON
These types of restrictions on abortion access are incredibly reckless and will cost women their lives, period. We have already seen it happen in other states, again and again, since Roe fell last year. Women dying of sepsis, or bleeding out, because doctors are too afraid to provide the basic medical care that would save their lives. POLITICIANS ARE NOT DOCTORS. They have no business inserting themselves into the medical decisions of private citizens. Please ask yourself WHAT QUALIFIES YOU to determine the circumstances under which an abortion is medically necessary? Whatever your personal beliefs, it is completely inappropriate to legislate medical care AGAINST THE RECOMMENDATIONS of qualified physicians and medical experts. Truly how dare you even consider it. It is the height of hubris, and the blood of the women of Iowa will be on your hands if you pass this dangerous bill. PLEASE VOTE NO.
07-10-2023
Jeremy Whitaker []
CON
Iowa already has difficulty recruiting doctors to work in rural areas and few rural hospitals have enough OB/GYNs to deliver babies. This bill will worsen the situation and close the few labor and delivery units in rural Iowa that have managed to hang on.
07-10-2023
Samantha Perry [-]
CON
Medical decisions should be between an individual and their Doctor, not politicians.
07-10-2023
Diane M. Duncan-Goldsmith []
CON
Submitting yet another heartbeat bill is a gross and egregious representation of fetal development and a continued attack on what must be a womans right to make her own medical decisions without any legislative interference. The bills list of definitions states Fetal heartbeat means cardiac activity. However, in the very early weeks of pregnancy what this bill defines as cardiac activity is misleading because the fetal heart isn't fully developed and many women may not even know they are pregnant. For this reason, the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecologists (ACOG) defines the fluttering of cells in the embryonic heart tube as "cardiac activity" rather than a heartbeat. Governor Reynoldss special session can only be seen as an attempt to restrict a womens right to selfdetermination and making her own health care decisions regarding an extremely personal decision regarding the right to abortion is simply another conservative power play. It most certainly has absolutely nothing to do with safe guarding the health of a woman during pregnancy. I am so very tired of Reynoldss endless mantra about protecting the unborn. Pregnancy is certainly the most dangerous decision a woman can make; a decision which we know can have serious, life threatening complications. For our family, after what was a normal, uncomplicated pregnancy, immediately after the birth of her daughter our daughter almost died due to massive blood loss and was rushed to surgery in order to save her life. Her physician had only seen this complication once in her very long career. Two of our nieces also had complications during pregnancy and/or delivery. Both had positive outcomes as a result of the quality medical care they received. For Governor Reynolds to state the Iowa Supreme Courts recent decision disregards the will of Iowa voters is of course a lie. She knows facts show sixtyone percent of Iowa adults say abortion should be legal in all or most cases compared to 35% who believe it should be illegal. The poll also showed more than twothirds of Iowa women, 70%, say abortion should be legal in most or all cases. Likewise, 72% of Iowans under age 35 and 70% of city dwellers also say abortion should be legal in all or most cases. I am not certain as to which voters the Governor is referencing; Iowa voters overwhelmingly support abortion rights.It is time to stop playing politics with what are absolutely very personal health care decisions which should only be made by a woman and her doctors. Legislative interference in these decisions is simply wrong. I adamantly oppose this bill.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This ban is cruel and unnecessary.
07-10-2023
Don Reid []
CON
This bill will increase maternity deaths. Increase the flight of Ob/gyns from Iowa. Decrease businesses moving to Iowa. Increase young couples moving out of Iowa. By the way, there is no "heart" at six weeks, just a few blood cells. The actual heart doesn't develop until 1720 weeks.
07-10-2023
Beth Lauterbach []
CON
This is not an issue that should even be brought up in Iowa, let alone to hold a special session over. Reproductive issues are a private decision between patients and healthcare providers, not a pothlitical game ball. More proof that the governor has her mind on something other than what is good for Iowans. If you were truly concerned about people, you would be working on the support systems that you have been trying to tear apart. As people have access to healthcare and support systems (including education), and the autonomy over their own bodies, abortions go down. Iowa does not need to be following a national political agenda.
07-10-2023
Florence Williams []
CON
This special legislative session is an outrage. Restricting abortion access further is very unpopular among Iowans and a severe affront to our freedoms and bodily autonomy. Legislators should NOT get in between individuals and their doctors. Legislators don't have the expertise to make these types of decisions that GO AGAINST the advice of major medical associations. The American Medical Association (AMA) has said that further restrictions to abortion care is an "egregious allowance of government intrusion into medicine."Let's be clear even in instances where there is no possibility of the fetus surviving, abortion restrictions put women's lives in danger. To not be able to immediately address ectopic pregnancies or severe complications, for fear of legal repercussions, is unacceptable. These choices should be between a woman (or trans man) and their doctor. The current abortion limits are at least based on some consideration of viability. There is no reason to further restrict women's freedoms. And to be additionally clear at 6 weeks there is no heart, and therefore there is no heartbeat. Polarized cells with electrical activity are not inherently a heart.If you had to evacuate a hospital, and could either save some frozen embryos or a living baby, most of us would save the baby, because we acknowledge that there is a difference between the potential of a human being and a fully formed human being. A 6week old fetus is NOT more valuable than the woman carrying it. Women's lives deserve protection.
07-10-2023
Kim H []
CON
This bill goes against what a majority of Iowans want. As representatives for the people of the state it is your obligation to listen to what Iowans want and vote against this bill!
07-10-2023
Kay Pence []
CON
Politicians should not be imposing religious views onto Iowans. Instead focus on ways to make it easier to choose life. The number 1 reason for seeking an abortion is economic. Raise the minimum wage, increase wages for childcare workers, expand medicaid to 12 months postpartum, encourage paid time off for family and medical leaves.
07-10-2023
Saralyn Schlievert [n/a]
CON
I am not in favor of abortion, but strongly oppose this legislation or any other that would impact a woman's reproductive rights. This should be a decision between a woman and her healthcare provider not a decision made by politicians. If our Iowa legislature wants to protect children, they should instead have a special session to limit gun rights or increase financial and child care assistance for lowincome working families and their children.
07-10-2023
Sarah Goettsch [Gloria Dei Lutheran Church]
CON
I am not able to attend tomorrow, but wish my voice to be heard that it is a womans right to determine the well being of her body. Unwanted pregnancies and unwanted children are inhumane. The decision to give birth lies with the mother. If this is not the case, then we can begin speaking to mandatory vasectomies for men.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
As a young woman that would be personally affected by this bill, I feel that medical decisions are best made between a patient and a doctor. I trust people to make the best decision for themselves, in conversation with their doctor. I would appreciate it if my legislator would trust that I, and other adults, are responsible enough to make our own healthcare decisions.At 6 weeks, most people do not even realize they are pregnant. Therefore, to ban abortion at this stage, is to essentially force people into a situation where they have no choice but to carry the pregnancy to term, regardless of their health, financial, or family situation, regardless of their ability to care for a child after birth.I understand the bill includes certain exceptions in cases of rape or incest or if the mothers life is in danger. In the case of the first two, the exceptions only are applicable if the person files a police report within a certain number of days and then proves it to their doctor. While I hope that one day, everyone feels comfortable and safe enough to report rape and incest to law enforcement, the sad reality is that that is not always the case. People feel unable to report these incidents to the police for a number of reasons and sometimes, filing a report can put them in even more danger. Therefore, this exception puts even more stress and shame on the victim and places undue burden on them.With regards to the exceptions for the life of the mother, I would ask how the legislature intends to determine what constitutes someones life being at risk. If the doctor says that there is a chance of the pregnancy being fatal, is that adequate? Or does someone have to be on deaths door for them to be able to access abortion care? This lack of clarity creates confusion for patients and medical professionals and that confusion can lead to unnecessary and avoidable stress and even deaths, as weve seen in other states with strict bans on abortion.Finally, if I were to die today, doctors would not be allowed to use any of my organs to save a life, unless I had given my consent prior to death to be an organ donor. Even in death, my bodily autonomy and personal medical decisions would be honored and respected, even if disregarding them could save a life (or multiple lives). However, as a living, breathing adult woman who has the capacity for pregnancy, my bodily autonomy, my right to decide my own healthcare choices could be taken away. What message does it send to the people of Iowa that a corpse would have more rights over their body than they do?
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Abortion access is healthcare and is necessary. In a country where the maternal mortality rate threatens the lives of pregnant people, Iowans should have access to life saving measures that abortions provide. Iowans who are able to get pregnant should not have to worry about someone else making medical decisions for them based on their own religious beliefs in a country that claims to have freedom of and from religion. By continuing to strip Iowans of their healthcare access and rights we will continue to neglect women, people of color, the impoverished, and those who love them. I strongly support abortion for all. I am a born and raised Iowan, with both a Bachelors and Masters degree from the University of Iowa, a proud public teacher of history, and a lover of Iowa. I want to stop being ashamed of the state I moved back to. I want to stop considering moving to a more open and accepting state. I want to know that if my birth control fails I have options to protect my future and my health through abortion. I have many loved ones who have had abortions and who have greatly benefitted from that option. Please protect abortion rights.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Frenzel]
CON
Could you please provide a list of all the OB/GYNs that were consulted before and during the crafting of this bill? Also, could you please include where they are employed or if they are in private practice? My concern is this bill did not consult those professionals who will be impacted the most by this bill. This bill places those practitioners in unthinkable and dangerous situations.
07-10-2023
Michelle DeClerck [On behalf of intelligent women]
CON
Vote with the majority and please quit insulting women by assuming they are not intelligent enough to make their own choices and by putting women in further danger.
07-10-2023
Brenda Tyler []
CON
I strongly and respectfully urge every member of the Iowa Legislature to STOP attacks on abortion rights in Iowa and vote NO to ANY legislation limiting or restricting a woman's right to maintain control of her own body.The decision to terminate a pregnancy MUST be made by a woman and her health care provider NOT by the government.I implore you not to sacrifice the rights and health of Iowa women to curry favor with a political movement out of touch with the citizens of Iowa. A growing majority of Iowan's support the right of a women to choose. As an elected official, your efforts to restrict abortion demonstrate a total disregard for your constituents.
07-10-2023
Shelly Turner []
CON
Women should have the right to choose what happens to their bodies.
07-10-2023
Kelsey Hampton []
CON
This is an incredibly damaging piece of proposed legislation which would endanger the lives and health of Iowans. Iowans overwhelmingly support safe and legal access to abortion, and this would effectively outlaw abortion before most women know they are pregnant. This will cost women their lives and will not improve outcomes for children. Our citizens deserve access to healthcare and decisionmaking power over their own bodies. I am extremely opposed to this legislation.
07-10-2023
Nickole Miller []
CON
ABORTION RIGHTS ARE HUMAN RIGHT RIGHTS:Reproductive rights including the right to abortion are essential for people to enjoy their human rights. Iowa has an obligation to respect, protect, and fulfill the human rights of its citizens, including those concerning sexual and reproductive health and autonomy. Abortion bans and restrictions places many other protected human rights at risk as well, including rights to nondiscrimination and equality; to life, health, and information; to freedom from torture and cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment; to privacy and bodily autonomy and integrity; to decide the number and spacing of children; to liberty; to enjoy the benefits of scientific progress; and to freedom of conscience and religion. Furthermore, abortion bans are most devastating for people of color, young people, and marginalized communities, who already have trouble accessing health care and other needed services. All Iowans should have the freedom to make the best decision for themselves about if, when, and how to start or grow a family free from government interference.Please vote AGAINST HSB 255.
07-10-2023
Robert Traer [None]
CON
The right of a woman to make a decision about abortion in consultation with a doctor should be protected by law in Iowa as was under the Roe Supreme Court decisions. A clear majority of Iowans support this right. The Iowa legislature should not arrogantly repudiate this right.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
:The decisions regarding abortion are a medical issue that should be between the physicians and their patient. They should be able to come to the best possible decision for all concerned based on the best medical information.The State has no standing nor expertise to impose rules that polling shows are opposed by a majority of Iowans.This overreach should be recognized for what it is and be quickly dismissed as a basic threat to our democracy.
07-10-2023
Barbara Kelly [Iowa resident]
CON
It is unconscionable to restrict access to healthcare services for women that endangers their lives, wellbeing and futures. Im terrified for women in Iowa of child bearing age who would suffer under this legislation. The inequity and unjustness of this not only affects women but all of society.
07-10-2023
joel and jane teetzen [John Birch]
PRO
Life begins at conception! God determines when life begins, not government!
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
There is no need for this and without including required paid maternity/paternity leave, increases funding for neonatal care and public assistance for lower income Iowans with children this is just punishing lower income Iowans who cant afford to travel to a state that does not have these restrictions.There is nothing pro life about this as there is nothing in here that will help ensure both mothers and children have life, this is just forcing birth on lower income people and punishing those lower income women specifically.
07-10-2023
Alina Beltrami []
CON
I am strongly opposed to the stated bill HSB 255 and as an Iowa Resident I hope law makers will not proceed with this or any other bills like it. It not only removes the sacred trust between a patient and their doctor it shows how little respect there is for those who become pregnant and the safety for them. Pregnancy is one of the most dangerous things someone can undergo and taking way their ability to handle their pregnancy, and/or miscarriage in a safe manner is unacceptable from a state that claims to be for their constituents. As a medical student I have heard horror stories of other places where woman have either had to wait until they were septic to receive the care need or have died because they could not access the care they needed. My future as a physician in the state of Iowa and so many others I know will be decided with legislation like this; the state continues to try and force its way into the doctorpatient relationship you will be driving so many doctors out of the state. Additionally, the claim that once a fetal "heartbeat" is heard means an abortion is no longer allowed is an arbitrary deciding factor since that "heartbeat" isn't an actual heart yet but just tissue that could become a heart if things go exactly as they should and no deformities or malformations or mutations occur that most of the time can't be seen until farther along. A fetus is not viable until 22 weeks (at best and likely with severe disabilities) there is no life for that fetus prior to 22 weeks outside of the womb so how can it be it's own person. The majority of Iowans also agree that not all abortion should be banned and that is what this law does. Even with the so called exceptions for rape, incest, and the life of the mother. How will you know if someone's pregnancy was the result of rape or not when so many do not report their assault for fear of retaliation or the stigma and the way they are treated after the fact. On top of that if they report it and are awaiting trial their rapist isn't considered guilty yet in the eyes of the law so how can you say they were raped if their rapist was not found guilty and with trials going on for weeks to months it could be too late and the survivor will have to live with their rapist's child or carrying their rapist child to term for their rest of their lives. For all the reasons I have stated above I am strongly opposed to this bill and hope it will not be enacted.
07-10-2023
Anna Kucera []
CON
Abortion is an intensely personal and complex decision that should remain within the domain of a pregnant person, their family, and their healthcare provider. Every person deserves the right to make choices about their own body, their reproductive health, and their future. By supporting this bill, we risk undermining these fundamental rights and jeopardizing the safety of countless birthing parents.
07-10-2023
Anne Tabor []
CON
Please make this statement available to all legislatorsboth in the house and senate as my comments also apply to SSB 1223. I am strongly against government interference with anyones health care decisions. How incredible this legislative body would vote against face mask mandates during a deadly pandemic crying keep your hands off my body now turn around and think they can legislate a womans health care decisions. Making abortion a crime will create significant health care risks for women as well as economic, social and psychological harm. I demand legislators follow desires of majority of Iowans which is to keep abortion safe and legal, not their own personal beliefs, not radical right wing policies and not religious demands. We are a government of the majority. If religious organizations reject abortion then they can follow that belief but we dont make laws based on religionor can women in Iowa look forward to having further rights taken away? I will not even start with lack of support for women and children in this stateinadequate family medical leave, lack of free/ low cost and accessible daycare/preschool, adequate health care and affordable housing and living wages. Support these issues and show true support for a childs life.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
The Iowa Supreme Court already ruled, Iowa's constitution is clear. In Iowa we still have health care privacy and autonomy. This is a waste of tax payer time and money as it will be challenged again if passed and we do not need to have a special session.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I believe that all women should have the right to make decisions about their own bodies and healthcare. This bill takes away from thhe freedom to choose what a woman does with her own body
07-10-2023
Margot Tollefson/Conard []
CON
I see the antiabortion movement as a backlash against women being as free as men to have sex. The facts on abortion are that most abortions occur before the twelfth week of pregnancy. For those that do not, the reason is usually that more that twelve weeks was needed to raise the necessary money or that there is a health problem with the pregnancy.So, women are acting responsibly with regard to terminating a pregnancy. Putting restrictions on when an abortion can occur is far more likely to cause harm than good. And, no woman should be forced to carry a pregnancy to term against her desire.
07-10-2023
Chris Smith [Public ]
CON
Any decision regarding a womans health should be between her and her doctor. Legislators should butt out.
07-10-2023
Amy Belice []
CON
Women should be making their own healthcare decisions.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
61% of Iowans are against the proposed abortion restrictions. I'm in that 61%. If you vote yes, you are ruling OVER me, not REPRESENTING me. Vote this down.Why would you want to strip rights from half of your voters? Why would you want to do this to your wife, daughters, granddaughters? Do you want to be known as the Iowa legislator who instituted Government Mandated Births? Vote no.
07-10-2023
Erin Rial []
CON
It's impossible for me to believe that the party that claims to respect parental rights doesnt respect a woman's right to chose when she is ready and able or willing to parent. Families in Iowa arent asking for your help here.Iowa families consistently point to mental health services as lacking, child care costs as prohibitative and hyperpartisanship as not at all constructive.Fix that Iowa.
07-10-2023
Jennifer Oney Hooven []
CON
Abortion is healthcare. A ban of any type on abortion is costing lives. This administration wants to ban abortion and at the same time gut social programs like WIC and SNAP, showing they truly aren't ProLife. This administration has also shown callous disregard for children by taking money from public schools and giving it to charter schools (most of whom are religious). For the greater health of uterus havers across the state of Iowa, abortion must be made widely available.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Concerned Citizen]
CON
"Our liberties we prize, and our rights we will maintain."I thought Iowa was a place where people were able to live free of government intervention in their private lives, free of overreach and able to make their own decisions about how they want to live. This legislation takes away rights, is hypocritical and dangerous. It is not our place to decide for strangers what they should do with their bodies, or how they plan their future. We we should continue to apply the same criteria to others that we want ourselves, respect, decency, privacy.
07-10-2023
Kate Wolf []
CON
A large majority of Iowans are AGAINST the "fetal heartbeat" bill!"Fetal Heartbeat Bill" is a disingenuous term, as it does not refer to fetuses or heartbeats. It refers to the first signs of cardiac tissue activity in an embryo.
07-10-2023
Ruth Walker []
CON
The proposed bill is insulting to doctors, women, and families who can make their own best decisions based on the facts of their case! No medical procedures should be required by any government that are not medically necessary and are based on misinformation. What the ultrasound machine detects in an embryo at six weeks of pregnancy is actually just electrical activity from cells that aren't yet a heart, according to reproductive experts. And the sound that you "hear" is actually manufactured by the ultrasound machine, they say. There weren't laws in the USA against abortions before "quickening" until the 1820s. If the Christians were to actually read the scriptures, they would know that even their scriptures don't have rules against them. https://skepticsannotatedbible.com/saysabout/abortion.html
07-10-2023
Christy Jaworski []
CON
Im asking you to not pass this restrictive 6week abortion ban bill. These decisions should be between a woman and her doctor. When women are left with no alternatives, its not that they wont have abortions, but they will not have SAFE abortions. This will cost lives and is a human rights violation. Over 60% of citizens support legal abortions. If you didnt know this already, you wouldnt be trying to shove this bill through in a special session without time for debate. Listen to your constituents and not the special interests funding our Governor in her quest to make a name for herself. Do not pass this bill.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Iowa's abortion laws are good as they are and they don't need to change.
07-10-2023
Cheryl Hannah []
CON
Calling a special session about this is a total waste of taxpayer money. I am against this.
07-10-2023
Erin Howell-Gritsch []
CON
Please support reproductive freedom and do not allow the Iowa Legislature and Governor Reynolds to continue their attack on women's rights. Family planning belongs in the family, not the statehouse.
07-10-2023
Natalie Jacobson-Dunlop [M Health Fairview]
CON
I am a Certified Nurse Midwife who works in the M Health Fairview hospital systems. Abortion care saves lives and is an essential part of safe and evidenced based care for reproductive aged people.
07-10-2023
Patsy Martinson [ACLU reproductive rights volunteer]
CON
Im a volunteer with the NE Iowa ACLU reproductive rights pledge campaign volunteers. We support reproductive rights and access to abortion. Politicians do not belong in the private realm of womens health.So much is at stake with this intrusive attempt to dictate what women can do. Healthcare is a private and personal decision.You also put the expertise and knowledge of health care professionals at risk if you pass such legislation.There are 217 people here in NE Iowa who have already signed the ACLU pledge to support the right to reproductive health and access to abortion.VOTE NO ON HSB 255
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I would prefer healthcare outcomes to be determined by a doctor in individual circumstances. Each person is unique in their situation, and a doctor would be able to determine the right course of action in each case. A blanket ban is not helpful to ensuring individual rights and protections of individual freedoms.
07-10-2023
joan fitzsimmons []
CON
Our governor speaks of giving parents choice in education why NOT give the same parents the right to decide IF they want to become parents in the first place!! Recently, I discovered the death certificate of my great aunt. She didn't die of pneumonia, as I was told as a teenager, she died of a selfinduced abortion!! How horrible she must have felt as a young woman of 23 having to make such a decision and losing her life for making it. We can do better than this, Iowa!!
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
Im against it!!! I dont believe in abortion. ONLY. In cases of Rape , incest or if the mothers or babys life are in danger. On the other side : people should not us abortion as birth control. I dont understand why the government is getting involved anyway
07-10-2023
Cheryl Eason []
CON
I urge our state legislators to vote against HSB 255. A woman seeking an abortion does not make that decision lightly. She would have compelling reasons for making that difficult choice. Once the choice has been made, the procedure should be safe, legal, and performed in a clean, wellequipped facility by a competent, licensed medical professional. That happens when abortion is legal, not when it is illegal or when access to a legal abortion is extremely limited.Legislating against abortion doesn't stop abortions; instead, it ends safe abortions, particularly for those who are without significant financial resources.
07-10-2023
Dr. Danielle M. Wirth []
CON
Consider this. As a young college freshman, right before the passage of Roe v. Wade, I was harboring a 16 year old in my dorm room. She just had an illegal abortion. She was bleeding out. Her skin paled, her pulse was weak, and she was sweating. Panicked, I called my Mother, who said, "Nothing else matters, get her to the hospital or call an ambulance." Let the legal system work. My mother was militantly prochoice. So am I. Never again. The 16 year old child survived. She had a transfusion. I think she also had a hysterectomy. At age 9, I almost lost my Mother when she was sent home from a catholic hospital with a pregnancy that had turned septic. "IN god's hands now," claimed the high priest of the hospital bullshit. My grandmother came to stay with my younger sister and I. My Mother went to stay with my Aunt and Uncle. That very night, My Uncle took my mother to Beth Israel Hospital, where a wonderful OBGYN performed a D&C thus saving my Mother's life. As the good doctor stroked my Mom's hand,, she told my Mother, "You are young, You are healthy, should you choose to have more children in the future, You can. " She did. My two younger brothers are among my best friends. They would not exist had medical intervention not happened. I would not have had a Mother for the other 58 years without the medical care she received for a crisis pregnancy. Let women choose. Not your business. But, ramping up the crazed fanatic cult members of the radical "religious" right seems to be your current strategy. If you are so tied to religion, let me suggest, is there a place in hell for those of you who prefer to torture and punish living women? What would Jesus do? Stop using Jesus as your reason to take away civil rights from more than half the population. Fetal heart beat is an unscientific, inaccurate term. Cells begin a process called entrainment. There is NO HEART at 6 weeks. Are you all so uninformed/ ignorant of basic biology. Simple electrical pulses in cells start to entrain and fluctuate to electrical impulses in tamden. This is not cardiac activity. Stop lying. The majority of the IA Legislature acts with misogny, contempt for human rights, is cowardly regarding the growing religiouschristianfascism that powers the primary election process. Modern societies globally move towards advancing human rights. The rebublican Iowa legislature does the opposite. We as a state are judged globally. Iowa is an embarrassment, starting at the top with the governor who shrikes in shrill tones and is surly auditioning for a VP spot with a future candidate. Nazis banned books. Nazis refused to let persons of color, women and differently abled people live as full citizens with bodily autonomy. Stop lying about your intent. Early term abortions are far safer for women, especially young teens, than remaining pregnant. With this ban, you condemn women to be state prisoners for pregnancy that they do not choose or feel they must terminate due to their own reasons. This decision is between the women, their health care professionals and their god. How does republican intrusion into Iowa bedrooms square with "Freedom" and "small government". Shame on you all.
07-10-2023
Nancy D Hill [NARAL Pro-Choice America]
CON
As an Iowan, I firmly believe in personal autonomy. I oppose this bill on the grounds that it would block a woman, in collaboration with her health care provider, from making decisions about her own body. Please oppose HSB 255. Abortion bans are antithetical to the beliefs and wishes of Iowans.
07-10-2023
Vicki [Remsen St. Mary's School]
PRO
Please support the heartbeat bill. The child in utero is entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It is the foundation of our constitution and the faith of the founding fathers.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Being prochoice means supporting the right of individuals to make decisions about their own bodies and reproductive health. It acknowledges the complexity of pregnancy and respects the autonomy and dignity of individuals. Access to safe and legal abortion is a crucial aspect of reproductive rights, public health, and gender equality.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
You may read the following comments at the hearing but I do not want my name used as I am protecting the identity of my niece. Thank you. Governor Reynolds' plan to limit abortions so that none are allowed after 6 weeks is a dangerous farce. Most women don't even know they are pregnant at 6 weeks! Stop this insanity now or our society will decline back 50 years when women who needed abortions had to resort to backalley abortions, often resulting in the death of the fetus and the mother. Those of us who lived through the 60s and 70s remember this horror only too well. Women are NOT secondclass citizens; we should have full rights over our own bodies. Fetuses cannot live outside the mother's body until usually 24 weeks; it is basically a parasite. Therefore an unborn fetus should not have more rights than a woman. I know there are many other Iowans who feel the same way as I do. I believe that this issue is such an explosive one that eventually the Supreme Court will have to decide whether an unborn fetus is considered a citizen of the United States with full rights, and I can't see how they could say a fetus has more rights than the woman carrying it when a fetus cannot survive on its own. For those legislators who are so keen to restrict abortions to none after 6 weeks, they should be prepared to pay the medical expenses of the mothers forced to carry unwanted fetuses to term, plus be prepared to adopt those children! If they're not prepared to do that, then they shouldn't be voting for this more restrictive legislation! Twenty weeks is bad enough. I have six siblings, three children, and three grandchildren. I also have a niece who had an abortion because she was way too young to become a mother; it would have ruined her life. She went on to get happily married and have three children of her own. I could have had an abortion but chose not to; however, I don't force my personal decision on others like the Governor and most Republican legislators are trying to do. Following this destructive path will force millions of women...and their men...to take unprecedented measures to force our government representatives to realize this. We'll elect new legislators...and governors...who truly represent us and we'll cause such an outcry that the Republican idiots in our state...and across the country...will finally pay attention to us!
07-10-2023
Robert Gavin [None]
CON
Abortion is health care & health decisions are between a woman and her doctor. Keep abortion legal.
07-10-2023
Ryan Lynch []
CON
I don't want the government involved in my families procreation decisions.
07-10-2023
Mary R Rittgers []
CON
As a native of Iowa/Des Moines I am against any limits on abortion. Women, like myself, have supported a womans access to legal and safe abortions.In the 1960s I was in my early twenties and married. My husband and I had 3 (three) babies in 4 (four) years.Abortion was not legal or an option.Years later, my two grown daughters had Legal abortions. They later had children with the same men.I BELIEVE IN A WOMANS CHOICE.No law should be written that would prevent a woman, of any age and income, to Decide if having a child is in the best interests of the Woman!No fetal heartbeat law!!!Yours as a mother of three and grandmother of five,Mary R Rittgers Des Moines, IA 50310
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am extremely against Governor Reynolds wasting the time of the people by continuing to fight against our basic rights. This will only benefit the rich and powerful at the cost of our society.
07-10-2023
Maryann Rasmussen []
CON
A six week fetal heartbeat abortion law will be a disaster for Iowa. There is no fetal heartbeat at six weeks so scientifically and practically this bill makes no sense. Women often don't know they're pregnant until after six weeks so this bill essentially takes away their right to decide whether pregnancy is right for them. Unless they can get to states that value women's reproductive rights like Illinois or Minnesota they are being forced by the state of Iowa to be pregnant no matter the circumstances, no matter their health situations, no matter their ages, no matter what they want. No forced vaccination in Iowa but forced gestation will be the law of the land. This bill will drive doctors from Iowa. it is happening in other states where these bills have passed. It will hurt our top ranked university hospital and medical school. It will send many of our best students and professionals looking for other places to attend college, have careers, raise kids. I know those of you pushing this bill don't think any of what I say is important or valid. You believe every fertilized egg deserves life. You don't think women have reproductive rights. You think your religious views are the only one that matters. Despite what polling tells you, you're going to force this bill into law and make women conform to what you think is right. You are not interested in listening. You are not going to change your minds. Instead you'll make it harder for those of us who disagree with you to vote. You'll redistrict, pass restrictive election laws, encourage people through threats or harassment or insults who don't agree with you to leave.Still, I write. I don't think you and Kim Reynolds and your Moms Against Women's Reproductive Liberty (and public school funding and reading and talking about sex and gender and race) are the future. You're the ugly past, resurfacing for one last gasp of power before the forces of history push you from governance. it's coming. You've been warned. Now go ahead, do this, don't listen. But mark me: You are and this will be a disaster for Iowa and when it comes don't forget we told you so.
07-10-2023
Eileen R Beran []
CON
General sentiment on the part of the majority in this country and state is that abortion should be legal, and I agree. Limitations should be moderated by medical ethics oversight, not the government.
07-10-2023
Peg Bouska [private citizen]
CON
Government should not intervene with the private business of one's healthcare decisions. Small government should not dictate citizens' reproductive care.
07-10-2023
Kevin Mathis []
CON
Iowans do not approve of an abortion ban as proposed. Leave these decisions to women and their doctors. Please support the law as it is today. Vote NO!
07-10-2023
Sheila Rae Trapp []
CON
The right to choose abortion is essential toensuring a woman can decide for herself if, whenand with whom to start or grow a family. We'llnever stop fighting to protect and expand thisfundamental human right. Abortions have a lowerdeath rate than plastic surgery, Colonoscopysurgery and even having a tonsillectomy. The Bibleeven states that life doesn't begin until thequickening. The right to abortion is endangered,the fundamental equality of women is threatened. Awoman can never be equal if she is denied thebasic right to make decisions for herself and herfamily.
07-10-2023
Michael Maharry MD []
CON
To our elected leaders,Being so intrusive into the doctor/patient relationship is not helpful. It is not how you all would want unless you do not wish for privacy and the freedom to make decisions about your own body. This proposed legislation will cause harm. I urge you to vote against it.
07-10-2023
Pam Deichmann MPH, RN [Public Health, Retired]
CON
I want to stand up for Women making their own reproductive health decisions. What and why are you thinking that a political party has the right to legislate and take away a personal decision verses a women and her health care provider making their healthcare decisions. The outcome of such a decision is to see women go underground or out of state for reproductive healthcare. Sadly...
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
As a physician and parent, I am against this bill. My belief is that our laws in the state of Iowa should uphold privacy rights for pregnant people and protect their right to make their own medical decisions.
07-10-2023
Floyd Sandford []
CON
STOP Interfering in the private and personal lives of Iowa citizens, the majority of whom support abortion rights. Iowa politicians should not be meddling in personal and medical matters affecting Iowa women and families. Iowans deserve better than having to endure Fascist power plays.
07-10-2023
Andrew Dorman []
CON
I am strongly against the legislation that restricts maternal healthcare in Iowa. Please vote no.
07-10-2023
Jennifer Herrington []
CON
According to the weeks KMA Radio poll, over 62% oppose restrictions on abortion. That is consistent with Iowa overall. Iowans DO NOT support this bill! Elected leaders represent the people! Your personal opinion is not what should guide your vote! Your job is to represent your constituency!
07-10-2023
Susie Hines []
CON
Abortion should be kept legal in Iowa. Period. (And that is not your business either.)
07-10-2023
Carolyn Ayers []
CON
I do not support any legislation that would restrict the rights of women to an abortion or other reproductive health care. Restricting medical care is putting a death sentence on many lives. Who in the third world countries would do such a thing? Ridiculous.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Self]
CON
A woman and her doctor should have the right to decide health issues, not the state. An abortion ban or severe restrictions on abortion due no favors to anyone. I would vote NO on Iowa legislation restricting abortion based solely n detecting a fetal heartbeat. A heart is just a muscle doing what it is programmed to do.
07-10-2023
Joanna Winston [â?? Joanna Winston]
CON
I am adamantly opposed to this unnecessary and blatantly rushed bill. Abortion is a healthcare issue to be decided upon by an individual, who knows what their personal health, mental health, and socioeconomic future is better than any lawmakers could. Until the state is willing to fund preschool, prenatal care, paid maternal leave, food assistance programs and housing assistance, we cannot call any of these laws "prolife".
07-10-2023
Lily Nellans []
CON
HSB 255 poses a grave threat to the lives and values of Iowans, myself included. I stand in strong opposition to HSB 255. My grandmother raised me to be an ardent abortion supporter because her mother died from an unregulated illegal abortion, leaving behind three young children. I believe that abortion at all stages during which it is regularly practiced should be legal, easily accessible, and affordable. I am not alone, polling shows that a majority of Iowans support legal abortion. It is an undemocratic affront to the people of Iowa to pass a bill restricting abortion. All credible medical sources support legal abortion. All the research shows that abortion is a safe procedure with low rates of complications and regret. Social science research shows that access to abortion saves lives and empowers people financially and emotionally. The only justification anyone can offer for HSB 255 is based on their individual faith. The constitutions of our state and our nation hold dear the separation of church and state. This bill is blatantly unconstitutional. HSB 255 violates the core tenets of democracy, violates Iowans' constitutional rights, and, if passed, will destroy the lives and livelihoods of thousands of Iowans. Thus, I urge all to vote no on HSB 255.
07-10-2023
Greg Friestad [Iowa citizen]
CON
Women's healthcare decisions must be left to individuals and their doctors. HSB 255 is an expansion of government into private lives of Iowans. In curtailing the freedom of women to determine their own destinies, it threatens everyone's constitutional rights and religious freedoms. This is unAmerican. Our mothers, wives, partners, sisters, daughters, nieces, and granddaughters deserve better. Vote NO on HSB 255.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
If government and politics didn't belong in healthcare during COVID, it doesn't belong in healthcare now.
07-10-2023
Bennett Noonan []
CON
To be frank, this action is a gross overreach by the Governor and the Iowa GOP for a multitude of reasons.Statistically, we know that abortions will happen, regardless of the law. When that's the case, making abortion illegal only serves to harm those seeking that service. Surely the Governor and the IA GOP can agree that they should not be taking action to increase likelihood of harm to their constituents.Rhetorically, this action isn't even consistent with the outrageous medical stance the Governor and IA GOP took during the pandemic: Trust Iowans. 60+% of Iowans want access to reproductive health care. Trust them to make those decisions with medical experts. Access to sufficient medical care should not be decided by a legislative body. I hope there is still some empathy and care left in the hearts of the majority party that can find sunlight in all this and make the right decision to back away from this outrageous action.
07-10-2023
Kimberly Karol [IPWU]
CON
The health of an individual is private. I do not want government or legislation to interfere or limit anyone's ability to get medical treatment of any kind. STOP imposing your values/beliefs on others. There is no justification for this madness. Start thinking about the real needs of your constituents like increasing wages, benefits and improving access to health care.
07-10-2023
Shawna Wagner [No]
CON
I've always been proud of Iowa's respect for individual rights and our inclusion of a woman's right to make her own reproductive decisions being right in our constitution.This ramrod attempt by the Governor to take those rights away is not what Iowa is all about. This is all about the Governor's attempt to make the leap to the federal stagedestroying individual rights (and rural healthcare, btw) for street cred in DC.This isn't about conservative vs. liberal. Kansas and Kentucky are certainly conservative places. Both states overwhelmingly support a woman's right to bodily autonomy and so do most Iowans.Please vote against this egregious assault on your constituents.
07-10-2023
Susan Barron []
CON
HSB 255 does not belong in the Iowa Legislature. Nor do you if you support interfering continually with the cycle of life. By ignoring the will of Iowans and pursuing your ongoing desire to control the bodily functions of women, and shame any healthcare provider or friend who seeks to medically treat a pregnancy you are wrong. You are blinded by your need to control, to take money, to cheat, but mostly to not act in the best interest of people. The Iowans who elected you.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Iowa. Stop Moms for Liberty]
CON
The Iowa legislature should not be taking rights away from its citizens. All people should have the right to seek, receive, and choose health care procedures without government interference.
07-10-2023
07-10-2023
Lynne Johnson []
CON
Against this legislation and any further restrictions on bodily autonomy of humans.
07-10-2023
Frank Simon [None]
CON
The special session is based on a theocratic view of governance and is authoritarian. Respect others opinions and gain respect for your work. Keep the state secular, nondenominational. . .
07-10-2023
Melissa Neuendorf []
CON
Keep abortion safe and legal. It is a human right.
07-10-2023
Desiree Johnson [NA]
CON
I oppose the fetal heartbeat abortion law that Gov. Reynolds is trying to pass.
07-10-2023
Andrew Mizerak, MD [McFarland Clinic, PC]
PRO
Warm Greetings,I would like to register my support of HSB 255 and remind the legislature that not all members of the Iowa Medical Society (IMS) stand opposed to this piece of legislation. I am one IMS member who supports the limitation on abortion in Iowa. Remember, what we are hoping to protect is a human zygote, a human embryo, and a human fetus. The operative word in that statement is human. This is no mere clump of cells, like an aberrant tumor. This is what we all once were. Our great greatgrandchildren will begin as this clump of cells. Its size, its dependency on its parent, or its selfawareness do not diminish the fact that it is first a human, a citizen of our great state, and the most vulnerable and helpless of us all. Respectfully,Andrew Mizerak, MD
07-10-2023
Laura Hubka []
CON
I'm an ultrasound technologist with 38 years of experience. I've seen some of the most heartwrenching and tragic stories from women and their pregnancies. There are many times that women have had a pregnancy that was doomed to failure. Much wanted pregnancies that they had to make decisions to terminate either for their own lives or because so loved pregnancy was being lost. Many of these situations are in the emergency room, where split decisions must be made. I can't imagine the physician in the emergency room having to take however long it would take to get through the bureaucracy of this law to make a decision. This could be life altering and even deadly. This just isn't women running off to clear out unwanted pregnancies. There are 12, 13 and 14 year olds that have been raped. There are adult women who have been abused. These are mothers and sisters and life partners. There are women who have lifethreatening illnesses whose birth control failed. There are women who need to make these choices, and they should be left at the hearts and minds of these women. Not to the capital building that has no business making these decisions for women that might be hundreds of miles away.We are not put on this Earth to judge others. We are here to help others find their way through difficult situations and support them.My next question would be, when will the legislature then decide that they can get between myself and the death decisions and rights for myself or a parent or child that is at end of life. Will the government then that they can make the choice at the end of life as well? How much of our lives do we want to put in control of the government?
07-10-2023
07-10-2023
April Ayres []
CON
I oppose HSB255.This proposed regulation limits an abortion to about 1 week, realistically, when a woman could find out they are pregnant. At this point in the pregnancy the embryo is not viable outside of the womb (it has implanted and has a neural tube, and the blood vessel that will develop into the heart begins pulsing). The embryo is still in the process of differentiating organs and will not be classified as a fetus until about a month later. Most women at this point do not realize they are pregnant.The decision to term a pregnancy is never an easy one and there are many reasons a woman chooses this path. But that should be a decision between a woman and her doctor.The current legislation allowing an abortion up to 20 weeks is appropriate.
07-10-2023
Karen Lueders []
CON
I am strongly opposed to an abortion ban in the state of Iowa. Reproductive rights are human rights. Do not take away the rights of Iowa women and do not impose your religious beliefs on others. Stand up for womens rights!!
07-10-2023
Anonymous [n/a]
CON
The majority of Iowans overwhelmingly support keeping healthcare, including abortion and contraception, safe and legal in the state of Iowa. We have seen how terribly unsafe and unjust these bans are in other states who have passed such restrictions. Bans like this will cause women to die the likes of which will have ripple effects: devastating families, ripping mothers from alreadyborn children's lives, disruption in workplaces, and more. These bans aren't only dangeous, and sometimes fatal, but they are unconstitutional. Bodily autonomy is a basic human right.
07-10-2023
Cara Kayse [n/a]
CON
I stand with fellow Iowans firmly against this bill or any actions designed to further restrict access to abortion. Abortion is Healthcare. Pregnant people will die in greater numbers if this bill passes.The idea of a fetal heartbeat at 6 weeks is deliberately misleading propaganda, designed to manipulate emotions. At 6 weeks, there is no fetus and there is no heart. These are scientific facts. At 6 weeks of gestation, heart valves dont exist in an embryo. The flickering seen on an ultrasound that early in a pregnancy is electrical activity, and the sound that is heard is actually manufactured by the ultrasound machine. Pregnant people in the US need to have bodily autonomy. Personhood belongs to pregnant people. Please vote against this restrictive bill.
07-10-2023
Marilyn Warling []
CON
I oppose this heartless bill. It has no compassion for the women of this state. Nor does is represent the wishes of 62% of Iowans or the advice of the medical community. It only supports the ideology of the governor.
07-10-2023
Karen Pratte []
CON
I oppose this bill which essentially bans abortion. It takes away women's rights and freedoms. Politicians have absolutely no business interfering with and controlling women's lives and their reproductive choices. Many women will die as a result of this cruel, cruel bill!
07-10-2023
Gail Schneider []
CON
I am strongly opposed to this legislation, which will effectively ban nearly all abortions in Iowa. Every abortion that is blocked does not result in a beautiful, healthy baby. Pregnancies are not always perfect or easy and this bill will put the lives of women in Iowa at risk incomplete miscarriages, ectopic pregnancies, infections, etc. Victims of rape or incest should not be revictamized again by the state forcing them to carry a resulting pregnancy to term. Ultimately this decision should be between a woman and her doctor, not mandated by legislators who know nothing of science or medicine.
07-10-2023
Leland Thomas []
CON
I am pro abortion and pro womens right to choose.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Self ]
CON
Do not take away our rights!
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
All deserve the right of choice
07-10-2023
Katherine Hauser,MD []
CON
I am a womens health care provider who specialized in caring for women experiencing difficulty becoming pregnant and provided care to assist them in their efforts to become pregnant.I was trained at Carver school of medicine and received my advanced fertility training there as well. In the course of providing health care to these women who want to be pregnant , I more than once a year would encounter a pregnancy that had attached not in the uterus but in a womans fallopian tube. A heart beat was visualized in a significant number of these pregnancies. There is no way to move these pregnancies to the mothers womb and letting nature take its course would place her future ability to conceive and even the mothers life at risk.Time is often of the essence in providing intervention if the mothers well being is to be maximized in treatment of these non viable conceptions.Placing a legislator in the consultation room as my patient and I make a live altering decision is completely inappropriate .Trust women and their physicians to make these difficult ,time sensitive decisions with out legislative interference and second guessing .Please vote no and preserve the health options of countless Iowa women who would be harmed by this ban.
07-10-2023
Joann Young [Self]
CON
Allow women choice!!
07-10-2023
Teresa Wass []
CON
Medical experts show the fetal heartbeat is not present until 1720 weeks. Evidence shows that the maternal and infant morbidity has rates severely increases in states with total bans or heartbeat bills. Even more blood on your hands than abortion that is legal and regulated. Medical evidence is against this bill. My religious rights are being violated as are others. This is not a Christian nation, it is national where you are free to be Christian. Quit imposing your beliefs on the public at large. Why dont we fund adoptions and strengthen our foster system to care of children already born? This legislation is about being pro birth not prolife.
07-10-2023
Harry Ehrlich [Protect My Innocence]
PRO
Support the intent and spirit of this legislation!
07-10-2023
Alicia D'Hont [n/a]
CON
I vehemently oppose this bill. Women cannot even confirm with their physician they are pregnant until after 6 weeks so this update in the bill essentially bans all abortions in our state. Without safe access to abortions here, women and girls will have to travel to other states where access is protected, taking money away from our state. Ultimately this bill will hurt women in our state.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [St. Maryâ??s School]
PRO
I believe there are rare occasions when a woman may need to have this done, but randomly no. To me it is taking a life. We put people in prison for taking a life.
07-10-2023
Rae Reilly []
CON
Please listen to the majority of Iowans who agree that abortions should be available to women. It is none of the government's business to interfere with discussions and decisions made between a woman and her medical provider.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
No one else can know a person's situation. Their health, welling, risks, and future. Abortion is a deeply personal decision. Everyone deserves the right to control their reproductive health, and their future. Politicians should it themselves in the middle
07-10-2023
Jessa M. []
CON
This is a decision that lies solely between a pregnant person and their doctor. The government should have NO say in what I or any other person does with their bodies. Very similar to the Governor's stance on the Covid19 vaccine. Why is the government not allowed to tell us to get vaccines but is allowed to force us to carry a fetus that we may not even be aware of until its too late? This bill will only harm Iowans. Abortions will never stop. No matter what restrictions you put on it. Instead, you should focus our tax dollars on funding sex education, social services, and other social programs that actually HELP those that need abortions. This is not a religious issue. It is a medical one. Even if it were religious, our country is supposed to respect the separation of church and state. Shame on Kim Reynolds.
07-10-2023
Brian McClatchey [- Select -]
CON
In support of women's rights and inline with the opinion of the majority of Iowans, I very strongly object to the reduction of abortion rights. I am so disappointed and disheartened by the imposition of legislation that is adverse to the wishes and expectations of the majority of Iowans.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I would like womens healthcare decisions to remain between a woman and her doctor and not have any government overreach and involvement. It is discriminatory against the female sex to have specific medical laws only involving them. It is also antifreedom and anti bodily autonomy to enact any such laws prohibiting care regarding womens health.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Citizen]
CON
To greatly reduce the number of abortions, the number of unplanned pregnancies must be reduced. Men have a role in reducing unplanned pregnancies, and therefore in reducing abortions. Yet the proposed legislation is silent about the role men play in the demand for abortion. Until men mind their seed, there will abortions. Of course women must also work to avoid unwanted pregnancies open access to birth control is therefore fundamental. Rather than imprisoning women and health professionals, lets start with the obvious: Men mind your seed. Lets be the first state in the country to use the power of social media to get the message out: Want to reduce abortions? Men mind your seed.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Majority of Iowans do not support restricting bodily autonomy for women. Please, listen to the people of Iowa: Your Constituents.
07-10-2023
Aaron Saylor []
CON
Please keep abortion safe and legal. My wife and I are raising 2 daughters in Iowa, and we don't want to have to choose between our home and our daughters' health and safety.
07-10-2023
Mary Murphy [Self]
CON
Vote this bill down. Women have a right to be free of someone else's religion, to express themselves freely and privately with their doctor without being burdened, to be free from unreasonable search and seizure, and to not be subject to involuntary servitude. Women also must have equal protection under the lawif Iowa's sons can access healthcare without being burdened by government interference than Iowa's daughters must be able to as well.Further, this bill is terrible for victims of domestic violence, rape, and incest, and its exceptions are weak. Some doctors may chose to avoid practicing in Iowa.Women should NOT be mandated by law to sign an acknowledgment they received written information from a doctor about a pregnancy because doing so is intrusive, discriminatory, paternalistic, misogynistic, and crafty. It looks like the legislators in favor of this bill are trying to get female patients to help incriminate doctors who provide medical care and advice. Finally, this bill, if enacted into law, will not help convince many businesses to move to Iowa and may in fact encourage young people who believe in equal access to medical care to leave Iowa.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I began my period at 10 years old. I was in 5th grade. At 10 years old, my body could have become pregnant, carried a fetus, and birthed a baby. Is it really appropriate to ask a 10 year old to be a parent? If this bill is passed, there will no doubt be young Iowa teens and preteens that will be forced to carry a child while still being a child themselves. In a 2009 Iowa State University study, among 1,000 low income families, it was discovered that 1 in 4 Iowa children between the ages of 1116 had had sex. The average age of first sexual intercourse experience was 12.7. Some kids in the study were even reporting having sex at age 8 or 9. It is unfair and unreasonable to ask children to give birth and raise a child while they are still a child themselves. This is a situation in which CHOICE can literally save someones childhood. Please allow Iowa families to make their own reproductive choices.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
PRO
As humans, I do not believe we have the right to decide another human albeit at an earlier stage of development should not have the right to life. Pregnancy, whether expected or not, is a part of nearly every woman's life, so our efforts would be better directed toward supporting women and their offspring before, during, and after pregnancy with education and medical, social, and economic resources.
07-10-2023
Jennie Ocken []
CON
keep abortions safe and legal in Iowa
07-10-2023
Anonymous [ACT, Inc.]
CON
As a proud Iowan, I am sickened and appalled at the Governor and the State Legislature for forcing their radical fundamentalist Christian agenda on all Iowans in HSB 255. This legislation threatens the lives of girls and women and strips them of their right to bodily autonomy. In addition, my religion teaches that life does not being at conception but with the first breath of life after birth. If Kim Reynolds and the Republican legislators were truly "prolife," they would invest their time, energy, and resources to protecting actual lives of citizens, instead of inflicting their dystopian cult onto Iowans.
07-10-2023
Lori Durian []
CON
I'm a lifelong Iowan currently residing in North Liberty. A little over 14 years ago I went to my OB/GYN for an appointment at 11 weeks pregnant. A heartbeat was not detected on the ultrasound in the clinic and I was referred to the hospital for additional/better scans. A heartbeat was not detected at the hospital either and it was determined that the fetus's heart had stopped at around 9 weeks. I had had a miscarriage and my body wasn't dispelling the fetal tissue. I returned to the hospital two days later to have a dilation and curettage procedure, an abortion. Without the abortion procedure, I was at risk of developing sepsis which could put my life at risk. The pregnancy was planned and very much wanted. The miscarriage and abortion were devastating, but necessary to preserve my health. It is not the business of the State of Iowa and its legislators to know why women seek abortions. I support the right of all women, regardless of reasoning, to seek abortions. To be clear, prohibiting the procedure at six weeks will endanger the lives of women like me, who did not know that I had miscarried until 11 weeks. Even with a provision within the proposed law stating that obtaining an abortion in circumstances like mine may be allowed, it is none of your business and requiring women to register the reason for their abortion procedure is a violation of our medical privacy and our reproductive rights. Here in the State of Iowa with the passage of last terms education/voucher bills, I was told I am the best person to make decisions about the education of my children. Now you are telling me that I cannot make my own decisions about my personal reproductive care. The hypocrisy is appalling and women will die.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Community Member]
CON
Abortion is healthcare and should remain safe and legal.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I don't think any government has any right to be involving themselves in the personal, private lives of individuals. I think very few things come to close to that same level of personalness as whether or not someone chooses to have an abortion. Personally, aligning with my political beliefs I don't care whether someone does or does not, all that I care about is that they are able to safely make that decision in the first place. It also worth noting that this specific topic coming into a special session so shortly after loosening child labor laws make it look like our state leadership is playing a very disgusting long con on the already struggling working class and I'm sure there are many current and soon to be voters seeing this, regardless of intention.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Vote NO on this bill. As long as humans procreate, there will be a need for safe and legal abortions. There are good reasons that we legalized abortion back in the 70s. Banning abortions does not STOP them, it merely makes them dangerous, frightening, shaming and unsafe. But women (and their male partners) will continue to seek them out. We do not need to go back to the dark ages with a bill such as this. Plus it's only making our state look bad and convincing many people to move away or not to come here, which in the long run is bad for our state and our economy. Thank you for voting NO.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The majority of Iowans disagree with restricting bodily autonomy for women. Please, listen to the wants of Iowans: Your Constituents.
07-10-2023
Stormy O'Brink [The Stokesbary and Hall Families]
CON
If you enact this legislation, people are going to die. My family is alive because my grandmother, Patricia Hall (who died in 2010), had an illegal abortion that saved her life right here in Iowa. In the 1960's, my grandmother began hemorrhaging severely at 17 weeks gestation. She visited the emergency department of St. Francis Hospital in Waterloo, IA to seek care. St. Francis later became Covenant Hospital, which is now Mercy One in Waterloo. Her doctor determined that an abortion was the only way to stop the hemorrhaging, and without it she would likely die. He and his nurse wheeled her into the bathroom on the children's ward, then performed the abortion in there while the nurse guarded the door. Through this illegal act, he saved her life. She went on to have more children, and her daughter had me. While Iowa may introduce legislation that bans most abortion, but allows abortions that will save a mother's life, most hospitals will operate from the standpoint of avoiding liability. Hospitals will create bureaucratic red tape that will stop medically necessary abortions to avoid being criminally charged by the state, and providers fear going to jail if their professional opinions on needed emergency care are challenged in court. This will inevitably lead people to die if they don't have a doctor willing to risk everything, as my grandmother had. My family owes everything to that doctor and to a safe, yet illegal abortion. This isn't the first time the issue of abortion touched my family. My grandfather's cousin, Diana Hoffman, died of an illegal abortion in Waterloo in 1957. Her boyfriend attempted to do one at home and accidentally perforated her uterus with the tools he used, causing her death. This happened because Diana was desperate and did not have access to safe, legal abortion. This legislation will not stop abortions, but it will make those with less health literacy more likely to die from attempting abortion with unsafe methods at home.If you ban abortion in any capacity, blood will be on your hands.
07-10-2023
Jon Ahrendsen MD [Self ]
CON
There absolutely needs to be permissions in any bill that allow abortion to protect the health of the mother, and to allow abortion when it is known that there are fetal developmental abnormalities that are not compatible with life outside of the womb. The vast majority of Iowans are satisfied with our present law. Passing a 6 week heartbeat bill, is going to cause more heartbreak and stress, that it will solve.
07-10-2023
Lynne Himmelreich, CNM-ret, FACNM []
CON
Abortion is a personal healthcare decision. More than 60% of Iowans support safe and accessible abortion care. As healthcare professionals, we know this decision should be made by a woman and her healthcare provider, not the government. When pregnancy complications arise, abortion bans limit our ability to provide the standard of care to our patients, further risking their health and lives. There is already a shortage of health care providers in this state, and government mandates restricting our ability to provide the best care possible may make this worse. Certified NurseMidwives provide reproductive health care and deeply care about the maternity care crisis and maternity care deserts. We urge you to redirect your efforts to improving the lives of Iowans. Leave health care decision making to individuals, and stay out of our exam rooms.
07-10-2023
Allison Carr []
CON
Abortion is healthcare. Full stop. It is not the business of the government to intervene in the healthcare decisions of a private individual and their healthcare provider. It is especially egregious to see a bill claiming to be protecting the "sanctity of life" when the same party will do nothing about keeping children safe from gun violence in their schools. This bill encroaches upon the liberty of all Iowans, regardless of their capacity to become or carry a pregnancy, because pregnancies effect entire families, entire communities. If this bill passes, we will continue to see the elimination of maternity wards due to a brain drain of physicians. Where are all the pregnant people meant to safely deliver a child if they cannot find a doctor within 100 miles? This plan is ghoulish, immoral, and motivated by a vacuous thirst for power.
07-10-2023
Arthur J Wyse [N/A]
CON
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Majority of lowans disagree with restricting bodily autonomy for women. Please, listen to the wants of lowans: Your Constituents.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
Discussion of a women's reproductive health is a private health matter, for her and her physician to consider. A woman's life could be at stake. Most people do not know they are pregnant until after 6 weeks. I oppose any restrictive legislation in this regard.
07-10-2023
Robin Jindrich Cecil [Cedar County Democrats]
CON
The will of the voters is to protect reproductive rights for women in our state. LISTEN TO THE VOTERS! 61% of Iowans do not believe stripping women of their rights is acceptable. You are not doctors; you are not counselors and the majority of you are not the owners of a uterus so kindly stay in your own lane.Thank you, Robin JindrichWest Branch, Iowa
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Iowa citizen ]
CON
If this law goes into effect our OBGYNs will leave in droves to live in states where they will not have to deal with the fear of continuous legal threats. In the end this will lead to more women dying. As a woman it makes me question if I even want to take that risk of going through a pregnancy knowing my options and overall health are not valued.
07-10-2023
Stephanie Anderson []
CON
I do not support this special session nor do I support any legislation that strips away fundamental freedoms and human rights enjoyed by Iowans. 61% of Iowans support reproductive freedom. This bill flies in the face of what the majority of Iowans want and I urge legislators to act upon the will of those they are supposed to represent and reject this bill.
07-10-2023
Robert Gertsen [Concerned citizen ]
CON
Restrictive laws will not end abortion. Restrictive laws will take rights and freedoms away from 50% of Iowans. Restrictive abortion laws will endanger the health of every woman.
07-10-2023
Sara Miller []
CON
Abortion is healthcare. We all know a woman that wouldn't be here if it weren't for abortion...we just sometimes like to call it something else. A D&C, an evacuation, or my favorite, a "medical miscarriage." No one is qualified to make this decision except the woman & her doctor. It's just not that simple. No one should be forced into parenthood. No one should be forced to die. The state doesn't have standing to make this decision for individuals & I am so incredibly sad that the Republican party of today can't see that. The one I grew up with could.
07-10-2023
Allie Hoskins []
CON
Im sure others have put it more eloquently and professionally, but FUCK the Iowa Republicans and Kim Reynolds for this horseshit bill. Instead of supporting comprehensive sex education, access to free/lowcost birth control, universal health care, and paid family leave for new parents, conservatives instead use Bronze Age superstitions and family values as justification for stripping women of bodily autonomy and human rights, while hypocritically claiming to be the party of small government. You are the reason why I cant wait to leave this hellhole state. But not before making sure I do what I can to vote you shitheads out.
07-10-2023
Amy Plotz []
CON
Iowa women deserve to have full decision making rights to their bodies. This special session and bill is clearly coming from conservative Christian politicians. They and their supporters can chose not to participate in abortions. However, passing a bill like this does not allow people with other beliefs the ability to opt out. Passing this bill will not impact this one isolated area. Our entire society will feel the effects in a few years. More families will be pushed into poverty. Mental health and domestic abuse issues will rise. Children experiencing neglect and abuse will rise. We need Iowa legislation to help people out of these situations, not push them into or further into them.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Iowa resident ]
CON
The Republican legislators and Governor Reynolds are not respecting individual freedoms as they their religious agenda to pass harmful laws.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Bohannan]
CON
This socalled fetal heartbeat ban is very close to a full ban on abortion. Many women will not know they are pregnant at that time, and with the shortage of OBGYN doctors in Iowa, they wont be able to get in within 6 weeks. 6 weeks is more than three months earlier than Iowas current law of 20 weeks. The current law strikes a good balance, is supported by the people of Iowa, and should remain in place. Women should be able to make their own healthcare decisions with their family and their doctor. If living in a free country means anything, it means that the government cannot force people into pregnancy and childbirth, which are very dangerous and have serious economic and personal consequences. This is the most extreme form of government overreach, a blatant infringement of personal freedom, and dangerous for people throughout Iowa. It is also clearly against the will of the overwhelming majority of Iowans.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Not every woman who gets an abortion doesn't want their child. Many desperately want a child of their own. I'm currently, undergoing fertility treatment. My advanced maternal age puts me at risk for my own health and my potential child's health. A six week ban doesn't allow for many of the problems that I or my baby could have to come to light. This means, I could be forced to bring a child to term that has its brain on the outside of its skull or any number of defects that would cause it to die at or near birth. Losing 9 months plus of reproductive time could easily mean I won't get to have a child. Because of my advanced maternal age, I may not get a second chance.Please don't punish women who want children. Please don't punish me.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Private citizen]
CON
The issue of abortion is complicated and involves situations where the mother may die, the fetus will die in the womb or live only for hours after birth, cases of rape, genetic diseases that will place an enormous burden on a family, and many others. The Iowa Legislature is not full of doctors or ethicists or preachers, you do not know the people who are making these decisions and you do not have the authority to force women to remain pregnant when the situation calls for a very difficult and private decision. That decision belongs with a woman, her family, her doctor and her network of support. Iowans do not want the Legislature to make this decision for them, they want the government to stay out of their private and very personal affairs. This bill will be a big mistake and Iowans do not support it. If you do not understand this now, you will understand it after you attempt to force it on us.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am against this bill. The government has no business in anyones medical decisions. It flies in the face of womens life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness. It is government overreach. Furthermore it seeks to impose a singular religious ideology on all and therefore goes against the separation of church and state. No one wants to have an abortion, but the option should be available for cases of rape, incest, or the life/health of the woman. Finally, studies show that when there are programs that focus on education, birth control, and helping women and children (WIC, child care, SNAP, etc.), abortions decrease. The majority of Iowans do NOT support this. Its time our elected officials actually listen to their constituents instead of their party.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None ]
CON
Im tired of the harmful legislation that my home state continues to implement, rather than improving our state. As a taxpayer Im feed up with the excessive spending which accompanies the legislation.Enough is enough.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
As a lifelong Iowan I am horrified to see the turn our legislature has taken. With obgyn services already difficult to access in some parts of the state, the healthcare decisions being made by Republicans in our legislature will only serve to drive healthcare providers out of our state entirely. Women will die, just as they have in other states, not simply because of a lack of abortion access, but because there will be fewer skilled providers to address other reproductive healthcare needs. This bill is damaging, and anyone with a conscience should be strongly opposed to it.
07-10-2023
Carol Gordon [Retired health/FCS teacher]
CON
Of course the decision on family planning should be between a woman, her family and her doctor! Nobody else should have ANY say in the issue, most especially legislators, the majority of whom are men with little or no knowledge of women's issues. With over 60% of Iowans wanting the present bill left as it is, it respects the people of Iowa to leave it that way. I am incensed that just because the governor didn't get her way, she has called a special session spending taxpayer's dollars!! There is something wrong with this picture. Just because she has the right to call a special session doesn't mean it is the right thing to do. Let's not let her make another legislative blunder which shows her disrespect for Iowans who pay her salary!!!
07-10-2023
Patricia Sheller [11000009107290]
CON
We'vw seen what happens in other states that pass this kind of legislation. Doctors become afraid to do lifesaving procedures. Women have nearly bled to death with ectpopic pregnancies. Women have experienced horrible infections when tissue left fron a miscarriage rots in their bodies. OB/GYNs leave the state; we already have a shortage.
07-10-2023
Nicole Hildenbrand-Elgin []
CON
Abortion is healthcare.
07-10-2023
Martha Dorow [Myself]
CON
I do NOT support this bill. Abortions should remain safe and legal after 6 weeks. The Legislature should have no say in women's choices regarding Healthcare. Abortion is healthcare.
07-10-2023
John PAschen, MD []
CON
The decision to obtain an abortion is a medical decision that should be left up to a woman and her health care provider. Any attempt to limit access to abortion is diminishing womans healthcare.
07-10-2023
DARCY VOOGD [Iowa citizen]
CON
This will not eliminate abortion. It will eliminate SAFE abortion in Iowa. Women will lose their lives due to this bill.
07-10-2023
Bonnie McAreavy [N/A]
CON
Contrary to the statements made by the Governor, the majority of Iowans support full reproductive freedom for the women of this state. First you stop trusting teachers, you stop trusting librarians, and now you stop trusting women and their doctors ability to make decisions for themselves. The socalled fetal heartbeat bill shows you also no longer trust obstetricians and gynecologists who have come out en masse to lay bare the fallacy that an actual heartbeat is detected at 6 weeks; if you believe in medical science you know that doesnt occur til nearly 20 weeks. Yet you pander to the uninformed but vocal minority instead of doing what is right for the women of Iowa. And at the same time, you reduce much needed food assistance and medical assistance. Why are families leaving Iowa? Look in the mirror. Dont pass this damaging bill.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
This legislation does not represent the values or wishes of a majority of Iowans.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Every woman should have the right to have an abortion. This bill will severely impact the health and safety of women. History has shown us that even when abortion is illegal, women would risk their lives attempting to exercise their bodily autonomy through dangerous procedures like coathanger abortions and other methods that are likely to kill the mother and the embryo. Access to abortion protects women from having to partake in such barbaric practices. A pregnancy test can only tell you if you are pregnant accurately after a missed period. 6 weeks is not enough time for a woman to find out she is pregnant AND make an informed decision of whether or not she would like to abort. As a woman, I ask every man involved in this decision to use their voice wisely. This issue does not impact you the way it impacts women. You should not be involved in making this decision, but you are. Thus, I must ask that rather than basing your decision in opinion, you base it in empathy towards your mother, sister, daughter, or any woman you love. It is truly their decision. Please do not take away their right to CHOOSE.
07-10-2023
Adrianna Sanchez []
CON
Majority of Iowans disagree with restricting bodily autonomy for women. Please, listen to the wants of Iowans: Your Constituents.
07-10-2023
Karen Knupp []
CON
Abortion is health care. Women have the right to self determination over our bodies. For an administration that runs on keeping government out of the peoples private lives (read permitless carry legislation) this is the ultimate in government intervening in peoples private lives. Women will die. This is unconscionable.
07-10-2023
Deidre Easton [Myself]
CON
I am completely against any new legislation restricting my female reproductive decisions and that of my fellow humans!
07-10-2023
Carol Tippe [Retired RN]
CON
Women are able to make informed personal choices and decisions with the doctors, midwives, and nurse practices when it comes to all aspects of their health care, especially whether or not to continue a pregnancy. No legislation should impose restrictions on a woman's right to choose
07-10-2023
Kathy Ryan -Tegen [Self]
CON
There is no need for a change to Iowas current abortion law. Women are half the population and quite capable of making their own decisions. To pretend otherwise and to exert your will over the people of Iowa is not why you were elected. Women do not need anyone to decide for them. If you want to go that route, you need to start imposing laws against mens reproductive autonomy. Otherwise its discriminatory and hypocritical. I dont want to see Iowa go back to shaming and coming down hard on young women who find themselves in a family way without support while the person who made her that way skates. Its time we start lifting each other up and being supportive. The religious people need to start following Jesuss example. Legislature if you want more babies to be born then do not cut food aide, expand health care/Medicaid, fund more daycare and increase the minimum wage. Business pay a living wage and good benefits. Walk the walk and talk the talk.
07-10-2023
Brenda Niblo []
CON
6 weeks is entirely too short of a time period to restrict the ability to receive an abortion. By the time a woman knows they are even pregnant (and thats if shes paying attention and has a regular menstrual period which is not as normal as you think) there is not enough time to schedule one let alone two doctors appointments. Doctors and their patients should be the ones deciding what is and is not in the best interest of the patient. Period.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am writing to express my STRONG opposition to this bill. All people need and deserve access to the full range of reproductive healthcare, including abortion. Banning access to this critical component of healthcare will keep individuals from seeking needed followup treatments, and will make clinicians question and put off treatment of a multitude of pregnancy complications (including ectopic pregnancy, which is life threatening) for fear of personal legal repercussions.There is no "heartbeat" at 6 weeks, as the heart has not developed yet. This is a definition fabricated by antichoice proponents. It is not based on medicine or science. This absurd definition will outlaw almost all abortions in this state, as many people do not know they are pregnant until well past past this marker most won't even have taken a pregnancy test at this point!The VAST MAJORITY of Iowans support the right to abortion. Individuals deserve to have bodily autonomy and to make medical decisions in consultation with trusted medical staff not via fiat from politicians.This bill is an outrageous attempt to control Iowans' bodies, and submit us to the religious will of a small number of very Conservative Christians, whose religious opinions should not be (and legally cannot be) forced on an entire state. They are free to practice their religion, but not to force others to adhere to their beliefs.I implore our elected officials to vote down this dangerous bill. Please do not do this.
07-10-2023
Julie Russell-Steuart [Chair, Disability Caucus of the Iowa Democratic Party]
CON
Statement on the six week abortion ban on behalf of the Disability Caucus of the Iowa Democratic Party by caucus Chair Julie RussellSteuart:The disability community is one of the most impacted by this harmful and egregiously damaging law. People with disabilities are more likely to have medical reasons to have an abortion that do not fit into any of the exemptions. Our medications can interfere with a successful pregnancy. We may not be physically able to carry a fetus to term, and this determination is unfairly placed on a medical provider that will no doubt have inconsistent and lifethreatening results for people with disabilities. There is no exception for emotional or psychological conditions or disabilities that can make it a painful but careful personal decision on readiness to have a child. Or familial conditions like access to a supportive environment in which to raise a child, size of family, or the womans age.It can be difficult to arrange travel to a clinic if you are mobility impaired, let alone at a distance. We all know that in the past few years hospitals in rural Iowa have lost their maternity wards. This bill further erodes access to timely reproductive care with its focus on banning abortion at six weeks, before most know they are pregnant. On exceptions: We are more likely to be victims of sexual violence, three times more likely to experience rape or sexual assault, and almost twice as likely to experience domestic violence than nondisabled women. When most rapes or incest are not reported, let alone reported within the limited timeframe in this bill, this becomes a level of trauma coming that is UNACCEPTABLE.Disability Advocates often talk about paternalism and bias against disabled people. The paternalistic viewpoint that says you are not in charge, that someone else is in charge of your body and life. The fight for bodily autonomy and the right to make medical decisions ourselves is a fight we have been having for a very long time. In other words, disability justice is and has been reproductive justice too. We do not consent to laws that are twisted and manipulated to maintain power over us.Each persons situation is different and there is no acceptable law except freedom to choose that fits them all. It is a terrible infringement on our bodily autonomy, and will lead to deaths, murders and suicides.Every right we have fought for has been led by the marginalized and the oppressed. The Reproductive Justice movement, begun in 1994, was led by feminists of color.Its activists of color, its been disability activists, and now its all of us as people that need reproductive healthcare.Every one of us is worthy of power over ourselves and our bodies and our choices. Please see this bill for what it is, an outright steal of every persons autonomy and a callous disregard for our lives.Julie RussellSteuart, Chair Disability Caucus of the Iowa Democratic Party7/10/2023
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Please keep abortion safe and legal in Iowa.
07-10-2023
MaryLea Holcomb []
CON
I think you have the cart before the horse. Before you force a woman with few resources to deliver a baby, don't you want to FIRST have in place her needed resources ahead of time? That is the legislation you want to work on first. In the meantime, please vote NO on HSB 255.
07-10-2023
Lauris Olson [N/a]
CON
Living in a free society should guarantee every person the right to medical resources and services most appropriate for his or her health, safety, welfare and independent existence without thirdparty subjective interference or philosophical influence.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Woman who wants to keep her rights]
CON
I wants my granddaughter to have the same rights when I was her age.
07-10-2023
Jennifer Nellans [Constituent ]
CON
Our rights should be protected NOT destroyed and eliminated by elected officials!
07-10-2023
Deidre Easton [Myself]
CON
I am completely against any new legislation restricting my female reproductive decisions and that of my fellow humans!
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Self]
CON
Was your excuse that a heartbeat could show up by week 8 not enough? BANS OFF OUR BODIES.
07-10-2023
Kristin Lee []
CON
This is absolute nonsense. Most people don't know they're pregnant at 6 weeks so this is functionally a ban on nearly all abortions. You cannot force people to bear children. It's disgusting and cruel and the idea that this was such an emergency that the governor had to call the legislature back into session just for this is frankly absurd. You should all be ashamed of yourselves for even considering this.
07-10-2023
Vicki Scott []
CON
I oppose any additional restrictions to abortion. The US maternal mortality rate is so much higher than other high income countries and this would restrict the options that women and their doctors ate able to make. So many times, these are already difficult decisions that women have to make about miscarriages and their own health issues.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/A public citizen ]
CON
If this bill would have been passed last summer, I would have either had to drive to another state to receive medical care for my second trimester missed miscarriage, or face potential death due to infection/complications. This bill negatively impacts both women who do and dont want children. Iowans dont want this.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Banning an abortion at 6 weeks is wrong. 6 weeks is way too early to sometimes even determine if a woman is pregnant. Teens who are abused or raped wouldnt even know they might be pregnant.
07-10-2023
Kristin Fairholm []
CON
This bill is not in the best interest of Iowans. The government should not be in the business of making health care decisions for Iowa women. It is dangerous.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [private citizen]
CON
Laura Dellos, Certified Nurse Midwife, speaking for myself, no conflicts. I speak in opposition to this bill. I am a CNM with who has delivered over 2500 babiesmost of these in Iowa. As a midwife, I have seen the agonizing decision when an unintended pregnancy occurs or when there is a complication with the mother's health or the health of the fetus. This decision should only be made by each pregnant person with or in consideration of her family. There is no other medical situation that is regulated by the government in this way and this sets a concerning precedent.It has been an honor to care for women in this State. Many are scared and angry by the actions of this legislatureappointments are filled with tears and anxiety as they consider the impact of bills like this on their futures. I share their concern and also worry about who will replace me when I step awaywe will not attract talented providers to a place with draconian laws like this one you are proposing. I am also the proud mother to two successful young men who have chosen NOT to return to Iowa given so many recent laws passed by this legislature. Neither of these two things, being a midwife or a mom to these amazing guys, would have been possible if safe, legal abortion services were not available when I needed them many years ago.Lastly, pregnancy does not occur in isolation. This bill only focuses on persons with a uterus. How and why are you not regulating a man's body? This bill is not in the best interest of the people of Iowa and does not reflect the will of the vast majority of people you represent.
07-10-2023
Helen Burford []
CON
Time to recognize women have equal rights. Women make their own health decisions. Take the blunders off, end the cruel behavior and stop HBB 255 and SSB 1223
07-10-2023
Jessica Galasso []
CON
Stripping autonomy of ones body from child bearing people will only do harm to Iowans. Youre putting people at risk with something that the majority of Iowans believe they should be able to access. Banning abortions doesnt stop abortions from happening. It only stops safe ones. Quit pushing your agenda and actually listen to the people in this state. For people who claim to love small government you Republicans sure do love forcing people you dont agree with what they can and cant do with their own bodies.
07-10-2023
Jake Tornholm []
CON
I register as opposed/con to this bill in my official capacity as City Council member for Williamsburg Iowa, and on behalf of the citizens I represent in Williamsburg.
07-10-2023
William Nellans []
CON
My Grandmother died and left three children under four years of age from a back alley abortion in Des Moines in 1921. We solved this awful situation by making abortion legal and under a Medical Doctor's supervision. You are so misguided if you take this decision away from a Woman and her Doctor.More Women will Die!
07-10-2023
Julia Easley [Citizen and Episcopal priest, Retired]
CON
I am a voter, a Christian and an ordained Episcopal priest. Vote no on this bill. Its consequences will be devastating to Iowa women, men and families.
07-10-2023
John Hurley [Concerned citizen]
CON
I respectfully ask for one minute of time to speak regarding the individual rights of women.
07-10-2023
Kathy McLain []
CON
Government regulations that infringe on an individuals constitutional beiliefs and rights is wrong, no matter the subject. We all have the right to make our own decisions, choices, and beliefs according to our own mores and traditions. It isn't someone elses right to infringe their beliefs on someone else just because they disagree and have a different belief system. No one can force you to have an abortion if you chose not to but you feel you can force a person to carry birth and be responsible for a child you have no connection to or interest in. That isn't what the law and government are for. Your duty is to serve all people to the best of your abilities. This bill needs to die and our state returns to one that puts the people's will and not their personal one at the forefront.
07-10-2023
Krysten reid []
CON
I am against you taking my and my daughters rights to our bodies away. Every one of my pregnancies was complicated, women should not be afraid of their doctors treating them just because they are pregnant. I would not advise my daughters to stay in the state if you do this. It will not be safe for them. Look at the horror stories out of Texas.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [none]
CON
The right to control one's own body is the first and most basic human right. Government has a fundamental responsibility to protect this human right. Denying a woman the ability to control her reproductivity is dehumanizing, is a form of enslavement, i.e., forcing a woman to bear a child against her will. The proposed legislation is opposed by a majority of Iowans and Americans across the country. It should not be thrust down the throats of women in this state.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Let the Woman decide to birth the fetus. Anything different is not right!
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I oppose the 6 weeks abortion ban. I remember the time before Roe vs Wade, and I hate to see us return to those desperate days. The only legislators that should vote for the ban are those willing to adopt any unwanted children born as a result of their choice since they gave women no choice.
07-10-2023
Candyce Ackland MD [Quad Cities Primary Care]
CON
No one should have the right to force a woman to proceed with an unwanted pregnancy. This decision is a highly personal one and should be made by the woman herself. Politicians need to stay out of medicine, an area in which they have no formal education. When we take away the opportunity for a woman to have a safe legal abortion we are also increasing the risk of returning to the past when women's lives were put at risk by self attempts at abortion or back street abortions. I ask that you vote no to this bill in support of all the women of Iowa and their families.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [APWU]
CON
I speak against both bills HSB255 and SSB1223. Nobody should have a say in the rights of a woman's body besides her. Women should be allowed to make medical decisions on their own without lawmakers dictating and pushing their own agenda. Quit ruining the state with the "old white man" ideologies and start looking towards the future. Women should have the right to pick what doctor they wish to see for medical treatment and what treatment they receive! Our state is already a laughing stock with the ridiculous child labor laws recently passed, don't let this be another step in the WRONG direction for this state.
07-10-2023
Angie Paschall []
CON
Women's healthcare should be guided by medical professionals and individuals who have direct experience and expertise in the field, rather than being subjected to political agendas. Such interference undermines the integrity of the healthcare system and disregards the importance of personalized, evidencebased care for women. Women deserve the right to access comprehensive healthcare services without undue political interference, ensuring their wellbeing and reproductive autonomy are prioritized.Please also see the attached comments.
Attachment
07-10-2023
Mary Joldersma []
CON
I do not support any restrictions or bans to abortion access which should remain a private decision by and between a pregnant person and the medical provider. I will not be voting/supporting any candidates who seek to limit/restrict or ban abortion access. We all deserve bodily autonomy and we are capable of making these decisions about our bodies without the interference of the government. Prochoice is Prolife
07-10-2023
07-10-2023
Francine Banwarth []
CON
Endangering women's lives with this measure is not pro life! Women need time to make these tough decisions with their doctors, loved ones, therapists, if they are fortunate enough to have these support systems!
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the fetal heartbeat bill currently under consideration. This legislation would limit a woman's right to determine the best course of action for her situation and would have devastating consequences for women's health and wellbeing. In addition, this legislation would place doctors at risk of frivolous lawsuits and create a chilling effect where providers are reticent to give information out of fear of being sued.I strongly believe this legislation is out of line with the majority of Iowans beliefs. Please do not pass this bill.
07-10-2023
Connie Mocha [Citizens ]
CON
We will keep track of how everyone votes. We will actively campaign against anyone voting for the ban!!
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Iowa citizen ]
CON
If this law goes into effect our OBGYNs will leave in droves to live in states where they will not have to deal with the fear of continuous legal threats. In the end this will lead to more women dying. As a woman it makes me question if I even want to take that risk of going through a pregnancy knowing my options and overall health are not valued.
07-10-2023
Catherine Rod []
CON
This bill is anti woman. Health care decisions belong to the woman and her doctor. I will work to defeat those who vote for this disastrous bill
07-10-2023
Katherine Kunau []
CON
KEEP ABORTION LEGAL IN IOWA. WHEN DID WE BECOME THE MIST EMBARRASSING STATE
07-10-2023
Patty Zahm []
CON
I strongly oppose this limitation of legally obtained abortion. Iowa law currently does not allow for "late term" abortion, so votes should not be cast for fear of that. Deliverers of babies should never have to worry about lifesaving procedures for the woman. Without the right to make a decision about her own body, this proposal would be stressful and potentially lifeending for a woman of childbearing age.
07-10-2023
Ryan Roenfeld []
CON
The Iowa where I grew up based policy decisions on pragmatism, logic, and common sense, not emotions or bowing down to a minority of religious zealots. It is not the place of the government of Iowa to tell any woman what she can or can not do with her uterus. That is between her and her doctor and isn't anyone else's business. No one. Not mine and surely not the state legislature.Remember when the Iowa GOP claimed to be devoted to limited government and personal choice? What happened? Hopefully someday the Iowa GOP will see that wedge issues and culture wars will only continue to encourage any young Iowan with an IQ over 70 to flee this state for somewhere that doesn't view Missouri as something worth admiring and imitating or base its government policy on superstition. If the legislator was serious about helping Iowa children they'd work for free college.
07-10-2023
Kathy Hay []
CON
Leave our bodies alone legislate vasectomies for all makes 18 and older they can be undone when they take responsibility that they will know when their partner is pregnant and are willing to be financially and accessible when raising their child for those having abortions due to medical complications for the mother and child and those who have been raped let the woman/child and family and their health care providers make their own decisions
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am against any further abortion restrictions. No one on the outside can know what situation a person might be in when facing this choice, which is why this decision should be made by the person and their doctor, and not politicians.
07-10-2023
LuAnn Widen []
CON
Reproductive freedom, for every woman.
07-10-2023
Molly Erickson []
CON
I am against HSB 255 because abortion is a choice each person has a right to make for themselves. The majority of Iowans support abortion access, and removing reproductive healthcare from Iowa would be a dangerous decision. Restriction does not prevent abortion, it prevents SAFE abortions from happening, putting more Iowans at risk. The decision to get an abortion is between a person and their doctor and no one else. Politicians should never be involved in that decision.
07-10-2023
Kimberly Noles [None]
CON
Over 70% of Iowansw do not want this ban. Reynolds & the far right have no business imposing this unpopular ban upon the majority against their will
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Abortion care is HEALTH CARE.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I, like a majority of Iowans, am vehemently opposed to this bill. It will not improve anyone's life, and in fact will only lead to harm and suffering for an untold number of women and the people who love them. This bill would prohibit abortion around 6 weeks, when a "heartbeat" can be heard, though a fetus' heart is not developed into a heart until closer to 20 weeks; the pulsing that this bill equates to a heartbeat is just pulses of undeveloped tissue, not a true heartbeat. And at 6 weeks, many women aren't even aware yet that they're pregnant, giving them no time to make an informed decision about their healthcare. This is one of many reasons healthcare providers, who actually know about medicine unlike the legislators proposing this bill, oppose this bill.And while this bill has an exception for victims of rape, that exception only extends to 6.5 weeks, forcing victims to retraumatize themselves and prove that they were assaulted in such a short timeframe when many victims haven't even processed what has happened to them. And if they're afraid to report their assault, or don't know that they have such a limited amount of time to do it, then they will be forced by the state to carry their rapist's child against their will. This is horribly and needlessly cruel and will further traumatize and harm victims.Iowans by and large have been content with our abortion laws to this point and do not want further restrictions, especially ones this draconian and repressive. This bill infringes on our rights to individual liberty and personal autonomy, and anyone who votes in favor of it is voting to insert government control into private healthcare decisions that impact people's lives forever. This bill is antiwoman, antichoice, antifreedom, and antiAmerican.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
PRO
Taking away the greatest gift from God after life of free will of anyone is wrong. I have always told and believe that God breathes the soul into one. This happens when a child takes their first breath. An embryo is not viable out side the womb at 6 weeks. A heartbeat does not define life. Live Women need to have more rights than a corpse. Education, making men more accountable, providing guidance and support to help people choose life is where we should be spending our resources.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/a]
CON
I am strongly opposed to any bill or act restricting or denying my right to an abortion. Lawmakers should not be restricting or legislating my healthcare. The problem is that abortion is not a black and white issue. There are many medically necessary reasons to perform an abortion making it a very blurry grey, which cannot be legislated. These grey blurry cases need to be decided between a patient and their doctor. As a healthcare worker in the field of Infertility care, such legislation is dangerous and can significantly impact infertile couples who are so desperately trying to have a baby. As a a woman, I have prayed to God that I would never be in a situation where I had toChoose an abortion. But I never want anyone making that decision for me and I will never judge or deny another woman the same right to decide for themselves. As a mother. I do not want anybody telling my daughters that they have no control over what happens to their bodies. Please Do Not pass any acts or bills restricting Iowas access to necessary reproductive health care. The access to abortion should be a right available to everyone!
07-10-2023
Veronica Hubbard [Public]
CON
People have the right to choose their healthcare and women have the right to choose whether to have an abortion. I am a lifelong Iowan and I do not support your stand nor do I support your actions in taking this basic right away from Iowans.
07-10-2023
Deanna Lehl [League of Women Voters]
CON
Keep the abortion limit at 20 weeks. After 20 weeks: rape, Incest, fetal deficiencies, fetal death.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [American College of Nurse Midwives-Iowa Affiliate]
CON
I believe every woman should have the ability to make her own decisions about her body and pregnancy. The government has no place in deciding this very delicate and difficult decision,
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Community Member]
CON
Abortion is healthcare and should remain safe and legal.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
As a young woman that would be personally affected by this bill, I feel that medical decisions are best made between a patient and a doctor. I trust people to make the best decision for themselves, in conversation with their doctor. I would appreciate it if my legislator would trust that I, and other adults, are responsible enough to make our own healthcare decisions.At 6 weeks, most people do not even realize they are pregnant. Therefore, to ban abortion at this stage, is to essentially force people into a situation where they have no choice but to carry the pregnancy to term, regardless of their health, financial, or family situation, regardless of their ability to care for a child after birth.I understand the bill includes certain exceptions in cases of rape or incest or if the mothers life is in danger. In the case of the first two, the exceptions only are applicable if the person files a police report within a certain number of days and then proves it to their doctor. While I hope that one day, everyone feels comfortable and safe enough to report rape and incest to law enforcement, the sad reality is that that is not always the case. People feel unable to report these incidents to the police for a number of reasons and sometimes, filing a report can put them in even more danger. Therefore, this exception puts even more stress and shame on the victim and places undue burden on them.With regards to the exceptions for the life of the mother, I would ask how the legislature intends to determine what constitutes someones life being at risk. If the doctor says that there is a chance of the pregnancy being fatal, is that adequate? Or does someone have to be on deaths door for them to be able to access abortion care? This lack of clarity creates confusion for patients and medical professionals and that confusion can lead to unnecessary and avoidable stress and even deaths, as weve seen in other states with strict bans on abortion.Finally, if I were to die today, doctors would not be allowed to use any of my organs to save a life, unless I had given my consent prior to death to be an organ donor. Even in death, my bodily autonomy and personal medical decisions would be honored and respected, even if disregarding them could save a life (or multiple lives). However, as a living, breathing adult woman who has the capacity for pregnancy, my bodily autonomy, my right to decide my own healthcare choices could be taken away. What message does it send to the people of Iowa that a corpse would have more rights over their body than they do?
07-10-2023
Adrianna Sanchez []
CON
Majority of Iowans disagree with restricting bodily autonomy for women. Please, listen to the wants of Iowans: Your Constituents.
07-10-2023
Jennifer Dugan Burns [Private citizen]
CON
I am absolutely against bill HSB 255. I believe in personal FREEDOM and dont believe my personal views should be forced upon anyone else. This bill takes away freedom from women to choose their own medical care. It harms the health and wellbeing of women and goes against the professional opinions of licensed health care workers. How dare our elected officials try to limit the personal freedoms of their constituents and propose a bill that will absolutely cause undue physical and mental harm, and in many cases death. I am not pro abortion. I am pro personal choice and freedom and against our government taking those freedoms away.Vote NO to HSB 255
07-10-2023
Heidi Zwick []
CON
I am strongly opposed to a ban on abortion. Women's healthcare decisions should be made in a doctor's office, not the Capitol.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
As a woman and a healthcare provider, I am begging you to not pass this bill. I refuse to have religious ideology overrule the rights of women. Abortion bans or abortion restrictions show that there is not a separation of Church and State. The Church and the State are one and the same when they force pregnancy onto unwilling women. Neither I nor my patients should be forced to carry a child based off of someone else's religious beliefs. Nor should we be forced to carry fetuses because you the government wish to have more workers in the future. Don't think I haven't noticed that this bill comes at a time when Iowan businesses are struggling to fill positions. Are you willing to torture your citizens with forced pregnancy for economic gain or religious superiority? If so, shame on you.Additionally, any "heartbeat bills" are based off of faulty logic and are SCIENTIFICALLY INACCURATE. You should listen to actual healthcare providers like me. Practitioners Christina Han and Cara C. Heuser wrote an article called "Antiabortion Heartbeat Bills Are neither Morally nor Legally Sound", I happen to agree with them. I suggest you read this article. These women have studied and practiced medicine for YEARS. How long have you legislatures studied the human body? Don't you think you should listen to actual experts over any illogical "feelings" you might have?I would also like to add that antiabortion laws create stress for healthcare providers and they are more likely to leave their jobs. I have heard of several individuals, myself included, who plan to move should this bill be passed. It is hard enough as it is to be a healthcare provider, we cannot handle having to commit moral injustices of not providing abortions to those who want them. Every hospital and healthcare office in the state is already short staffed. Are you really going to push even more healthcare workers to leave the state? I doubt that this comment will make any difference, but I'm asking you to have even a sliver of human decency. Do not pass this bill.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Student]
CON
This is dangerous for women all over Iowa.
07-10-2023
Emily Bush []
CON
I support healthcare for women.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The restrictions on abortion today are based on neither scientific fact nor the wishes of the majority of Iowans. Instead they are based solely on the small subsection of Christians wishing to enforce their beliefs on the entire population. This is a clear violation of the religious rights of other faiths and Iowans' bodily autonomy. Let us not move in the direction of other states that have forced women to be at death's door before receiving care. Let us not create laws based on one religion's beliefs and disregard for scientific fact. Today, let Iowans maintain their right to bodily autonomy and freedom from the injustice of forced birth.
07-10-2023
Jill Kimm MD [PP]
CON
Childbirth is dangerous and lifethreatening. US has the highest rate of maternal mortality of all developed nations. But dead of a woman does not seem to bother any of you. You can boldly force birth on almost every pregnant person in your question to save a blastocyst and then embryo. Removing rights that were protected for half a century out of your own personally held religious beliefs is one big step toward authoritarianism. Many religions, such as Judaism, mandate abortion in certain cases. Many religions place the life of a living human over the potential life of a clump of cells. Im a retired physician, and I plan to leave this authoritarian state for one in which the rights of all people, not just embryos, are protected,Iowa will become an obstetric desert and deaths will rise. Listen to the experts, not gossip, not FOX, not your pastor.
07-10-2023
Elizabeth Graf [Individual]
CON
I am a licensed physician assistant practicing in gynecology, reproductive endocrinology and adolescent medicine. I provide care for women throughout their lifespan. I strongly disagree with this far reaching abortion ban. Abortion is a complex and nuanced decision that cannot be whittled down to a 3 page legal statute. It is a decision that is to be made between a patient and her provider. While we encourage communities to lift up women and support them in their family planning goals, this law does the opposite by taking resources away from vulnerable individuals and families. My patients do not want the strict regulations to be passed and have told me this over and over and over again that they do not want government extremists to decide this issue for them. They are depending on me to provide them with comprehensive reproductive health care. This bill takes away their rights and puts them at risk. the fallout from this bill will be farreaching and will damage families and communities. Look around. All across the nation abortion measures have failed when put to a public vote. The far right Republican agenda has no place in governing Iowans.
07-10-2023
DeAnn Crane [None]
CON
I strongly oppose HSB 255
07-10-2023
Nedra Conrad []
CON
I believe in the separation of government and religion. I also believe women should have freedom of choice concerning their bodies, any and all parts of their bodies. I personally would not choose abortion however I will stand up for a womans choice. Please vote no regarding any law that will affect a womans freedom of choice.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Based on my Christian religions adherence to the notion of free will, I object to this legislation. The State shouldnt preclude my conscientious decisions on this issue. Our society recognizes conscientious objectors relative to war and dont criminalize their faithbased position. Why should the State preempt a free will decision related to abortion, particularly when it will, in effect, be regulating my body. Do not pass this legislation!
07-10-2023
BETTY GORDON [none]
PRO
LEAVE IOWA'S ABORTION BILL AS IS!Every woman have the right about their bodies what they choose.Exceptions: rape, molesting your children 13 and UNDER.***********************************************Kim Reynolds is sticking her nose in many different areas where it should NOT be going AGAINST what IOWANS WANT!please leave iowa's abortion bill AS IS! thank you!
07-10-2023
Jamie Dettmer []
CON
Please vote no
07-10-2023
Morgan [None]
CON
I think this abortion ban is completely unconstitutional. Who are our legislators, who do not have medical degrees, to tell people with uteruses what we can or cannot do with our bodies? This is just going to kill people with uteruses, and now also children. Victims of sexual assault, rape, or incest are now going to be required by law to carry out a pregnancy as a result of their assault(s). This is absolutely disgusting and unacceptable.
07-10-2023
Emily Bruns []
CON
Women's health care decisions should be made in partnership with their health care providers, not politicians. Let women make the choice that's best for them. Severely restricting abortions puts the lives of women in danger.
07-10-2023
VaLinda J. Parsons []
CON
This is the most egregious power grab of Governor Kim Reynolds's administration, in a very real effort to remove women's autonomy over their own bodies! What's even more hypocritical is that this is sponsored by the same woman and political party that considered wearing a face mask during the Covid 19 pandemic a threat to their "freedom." This is the same party that claims to be prolife, but doesn't give a *%#! for the lives of the girls and women who become pregnant, however conception occurs (rape, incest, etc.) It also smacks of Reynolds's political ambitions, showing her reckless disregard for her constituents but angling to be named a vice presidential candidate for 2024.
07-10-2023
Shawna Anderson [CCPC]
CON
Not only does science say that what is detected at 6 weeks isn't technically a heartbeat, but electronic pulses, but 6 weeks pregnant is only 2 weeks late. If we in Iowa are truly free, we must all be free to make medical decisions that best reflect our personal needs for our own bodies and lives. You will never end abortion. Only safe access to abortion. Meaning women will die, and if you pass this bill, their blood will be on your hands. The fetus they carry will also die, so passing this bill won't be pro life at all. I grew up with my Grandmother telling me stories of friends of hers bleeding to death. Of women that were butchered in kitchens, dying from infection when they knew they couldn't feed another mouth, leaving behind children they had already had. Many women that seek abortions are already mothers, making a choice for their families and themselves. And that's exactly what this should be, a choice We should be able to maintain our liberties and freedoms here in Iowa, which means our freedom to choose what to do with our bodies, and what medical procedures we have should only be between Iowans and their trusted physicians.
07-10-2023
Shirley Vermace []
CON
Prochoice is the only moral answer. Womenss rights are Human rights. Until women have full rights over their own bodies and their own choices in reproduction, will there be full justice for all. Your Christian values are absolutely okay for you, but you cannot legislate your religious belief systems onto others! Iowa people support PROCHOICE, same as Kansas, you saw it play out there. Stop attacking womens and girls basic human rights. This bill is Draconian and horrific and will traumatize hundreds of Iowa women and girls. You will not stop abortions, but you will see more deaths of women if you continue this bill to ban abortions. Just look at the stats from around the country. For instance, Colorado. They have birth control widely available and affordable, proper realistic sex education, and legal abortion and guess what?! The abortion rates plummeted in the State of Colorado! I may not be able to be there in time for the hearing, please add this comment as a CON, against this bill to ban abortions in Iowa. Thank you for your time.Shirley VermaceDecorah
07-10-2023
Samantha Shaffer []
CON
I am trying to understand how the governor and people who do not represent me are telling me that I want this bill. I would like to see statistics on who wants this bill. I feel that our governor and certain state representatives are trying to impose the religious beliefs on a majority of the citizens. I understand that some people believe that life starts from conception. That is not my religious belief. To me the items covered in this bill are a matter of health and privacy. Iowa has been and should never be a state that will impose religious beliefs on someone else. I feel this is changing and by pushing forward, a bill that isn't a compromise between the two sides starts a downward spiral into the imposition of those beliefs. Iowa has been a state that has been protective of people's health and privacy. I feel this is the case of a minority ruling over a majority. Some type of compromise needs to be held. Most women do not know that you are pregnant at 6 weeks. A 15week band would be a good compromise. Remember that when you make decisions, you make them for everybody in the state. Not a few select and this is a case of a few trying to ram their personal opinions through for the rest of the state. In addition, a lot of our representatives are men. And well I believe they should have a voice, they should not be making laws that only impact women's health. This is something that like Kansas and other states needs to be put on the ballot.
07-10-2023
Shirley Whiteside []
CON
I oppose the rush from Gov. Kim Reynolds to deny people the right to make their own decisions about their medical care and pregnancies. I understand this supports an initiative previously approved by Iowa voters, but those voters might not have understood the consequences of such a denial before the Supreme Court made its ruling that changed how rights are regarded on this issue. Send it back to the voters.The reports I have heard about doctors whose hands are tied from providing care in the states that have already tried this, and lives hurt by it should not be the Iowa story. I would like to see legislators work together to address the common good (like improving our water quality, or caring for widows and orphans) instead of taking on the role of disenfranchising citizens from managing their individual life stories.
07-10-2023
Kasi Zieminski []
CON
Abortion is health care, and health care is a human right. Any ban or restriction on abortion is harmful and takes away Iowans abilities to control their body and future. Abortion is a deeply personal decision. Every person deserves the right to control their reproductive health, and their future. Politicians should not put themselves in the middle of Iowans personal health care or their decisions. 61% of Iowans support access to safe and legal abortion. The majority of your constituents do not want this ban. Calling a special session in the middle of the summer to take rights away from your constituents is not about saving life; it's a dangerous abuse of power. One religious belief should never be inserted into public policy and allowed to take away anyone elses rights. Regardless of our personal beliefs, Iowans deserve the right to control their own futures and access the reproductive health care they need. Please vote against this harmful legislation.
07-10-2023
Elizabeth Patten []
CON
I urge you to reject any efforts to infringe on the rights of Iowans through abortion bans or restrictions this special session.I am among the growing majority of Iowans who do not support any additional restrictions or ban on abortion. The goal of abortion bans and restrictions is to take away people's power over their lives and their futures. Iowans are best equipped to make what should be private health care decisions between them, their doctor, their family and their faith. I am a proud mother but I was able to make that decision fully and all women deserve that right.
07-10-2023
Andrea Nus [n/a]
CON
I join the 61% of Iowans who support and believe the choice to terminate a pregnancy should be made between a physician and their patient, not the government.
07-10-2023
Anne McCullough Kelly []
CON
Abortion bans and restrictions disproportionately affect marginalized people who cannot afford to travel to another state for care. They widen already gaping health inequities for people of color, people with disabilities, people in rural areas, young people, and people with lowincomes, and make them more likely to be forced into pregnancy. No person who can get pregnant should ever be forced to carry a pregnancy to term. Legislating forced pregnancy violates a persons fundamental right to bodily autonomy, thereby violating the liberty of a person to make personal healthcare decisions about their reproductive health.
07-10-2023
Karen Bradway [None]
CON
It is welldocumented that the majority of Iowans are against the bill. It is not the place of the legislature to ignore or deliberately go against the will of the people.
07-10-2023
Janice Hawkins [Freedom from Religion/American Humanist Association]
CON
Re: Proposed Legislation to Control AbortionHow is it that elected officials have the sheer audacity to weigh in on whats going on in my uterus?Gov. Reynolds claims she is the advocate for the unborn child. This is an absolutely and utterly absurd flag to fly. The best advocate is the female who is carrying a child in utero. Both women have agency but only the woman carrying in utero has agency over all that is in her body. How is it that elected officials have the sheer audacity to weigh in on whats going on in my uterus? Thats my business as your uterus is your business. If you dont have a uterus, then what business do you have trying to control mine?Why are Christian values being forced on all the people? Its is not only wrong it should be weeded out whenever its head appears. I keep my religious beliefs to myself. As legislators, you should too. Religion has NO place in government.Please do NOT support any legislation that controls whatever happens in my individual uterus. Thats my business as your uterus is your business. If you dont have a uterus, then what business do you have trying to control mine?
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Ian opposed to this. Women should decide their medical needs with their doctors and the government should stay out of personal medical decisions. This bill will costs lives and the magority of Iowans are opposed.
07-10-2023
Robin Kopelman []
CON
Leave these decisions to women and their healthcare team. Lack of access to legal abortion services has negative consequences for womens mental health and their financial well being.
07-10-2023
Shirley Vermace []
CON
Prochoice is the only moral answer. Womenss rights are Human rights. Until women have full rights over their own bodies and their own choices in reproduction, will there be full justice for all. Your Christian values are absolutely okay for you, but you cannot legislate your religious belief systems onto others! Iowa people support PROCHOICE, same as Kansas, you saw it play out there. Stop attacking womens and girls basic human rights. This bill is Draconian and horrific and will traumatize hundreds of Iowa women and girls. You will not stop abortions, but you will see more deaths of women if you continue this bill to ban abortions. Just look at the stats from around the country. For instance, Colorado. They have birth control widely available and affordable, proper realistic sex education, and legal abortion and guess what?! The abortion rates plummeted in the State of Colorado! I may not be able to be there in time for the hearing, please add this comment as a CON, against this bill to ban abortions in Iowa. Thank you for your time.Shirley VermaceDecorah
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
This bill will inherently hurt women by stripping them of their right to chose. It seems like a massive step in the wrong direction to approve this bill that does not have a majority support among the public. This seems to be pressured by a few small groups with outlandish and outdated religious ideals which do not belong within policy or politics. Sadly, it feels this is all for naught and the Iowa Republicans will simply vote in favor of this to kept an overzealous Governor pleased so she wont fund new minions of her own to run against detractors in the next election cycle.
07-10-2023
Ciara Hoegh []
CON
We already have significant restrictions on abortion in our state. No new restrictions should be added. A majority of Iowans support reproductive freedom.If we want to decrease abortions in Iowa, let's address the underlying causes that make abortion necessary including a lack of access to contraception, a lack of affordable childcare, and significant food insecurity.
07-10-2023
Blake Iverson [Private citizen]
CON
If you cared about children and life, you would not be working so diligently to kick families off of Medicaid and SNAP. Youre all about children until theyre born, then theyre on their own. Good thing they can work in factories now.
07-10-2023
Anne Kirk, MD [None]
PRO
With the advances in science, as well as detailed imaging available to clearly visualize human development, it is now hard to deny the humanity present in the unborn, even at very early stages of development. If this organism, which possesses a unique human DNA different from its mother, is indeed a human being, then it seems a moral and ethical society should offer the unborn protection to the greatest extent possible. Based on the knowledge gained during my career in science and medicine, I do not find it possible to dismiss the essence of the unborn that of a human being deserving of protection.
07-10-2023
Jean Swenson [speakjing as an individual]
CON
As a 68 year old woman, I can't believe we're still debating abortion 50 years after Roe v Wade. My mother informed my sister and me of the importance of that decision in 1973, and made it very clear that this law would change women's lives for the better. As first generation women who could have safe, legal, accessible abortions, we had to make sure we NEVER went back to the olden, unsafe days of women's reproductive healthcare.Mom was right Roe v Wade DID change women's lives! Parenthood became a choice, not a burden. Women were able to enter the work world, and become selfsufficient and selfactualized. For those who longed for the days when women were barefoot & pregnant, and dependent on men for everything, these have been threatening times, and I believe we continue to debate abortion because of these longlasting baseless fears. Those who didn't wish to see women succeed outside of the home have spent their last 50 years fighting for inequality. Some even created the narrative that makes abortion a sin, and have worked very hard to spread that notion around the world, knowing fullwell that abortion is as old as humanity and will continue as long as people become pregnant.Because abortions will happen regardless of legislation, I would suggest we quickly defeat this illadvised. unpopular with Iowans, bill. Rather, let's continue to make reproductive healthcare, including abortions safe, legal, and accessible. Let us celebrate one another's differing views on abortion, knowing that each person's circumstances are unique, and none of our business. Do not limit someone's healthcare because of your own personal beliefs. Do not take away a person's freedom to make their own healthcare decisions. Do not strip away rights from pregnant people. Instead, live into our motto: "Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain."Thank you.
07-10-2023
Cheryl Todey []
CON
I do not support the abortion bill. Professionals in the medical field have shared concerns about this bill and the effects it will have on their patients. A bill put in place to limit the hands of doctors and prevent them from giving all of their patients the medically needed treatment they recommend is not acceptable. Medical decisions should be made by the professionally trained doctor and their patient. Our legislature has no place in this discussion. Passing this extreme bill will further alienate our young adults, women, families and medical professionals. Their exodus from the state will further hurt Iowa and our future.
07-10-2023
Jennifer Gill []
CON
I do not support this bill
07-10-2023
Patrick Clancy []
CON
I oppose HSB 255 as I belive the responsility for making all decisions about a woman's health belongs to the woman with consultation from Medical professionals, not politicians, and in the case of a minor, ones parents.Stop taking away women's rights!
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The majority of Iowans support a woman's right to choose. Don't let Reynolds take us further down the past of the extreme right. Vote against this bill.
07-10-2023
Diane Lynn Johnson [personal]
CON
I am appalled that a few government officials believe that they have the right to dictate the personal choices of millions of women. These people who would abuse their positions of power to force their personal beliefs on an entire population should be immediately removed from office.
07-10-2023
Andrea Weber [Iowa Citizen, Solon, Iowa]
CON
As a native and current Iowa, I do NOT support the current abortion ban legislation. Most women do not realize they are pregnant at this time so a 6week ban is really just the illusion of access to reproductive health services. There are exceptions for rape, yet require survivors to report the rape within 45 days of the pregnancy, which is barely 6 weeks itself. Again, this is the illusion of access to safe, reproductive health care.Women will die if this abortion ban passes. Daughters, mothers, sisters will die. Female children who are impregnated by sexual assault, women who receive in vitro fertilization that doesnt take properly, and women with lifethreatening medical complications of pregnancy will die because the healthcare providers set to care for them will be fearful of losing their license of the Class D felony that is being even considered in this bill. This is not justice. This does not protect families or even our children. My fellow women deserve more care than this.As a physician and mother of 2 young daughters who I would love to see have full decisionmaking in when they choose to start a family please do not support the proposed abortion legislation during the special session.
07-10-2023
Deb VanderGaast [Adaptive Daycare Services Inc]
CON
Banning abortions places the lives of women at risk by forcing them to take desperate measures to end unwanted pregnancies. My daughters have a genetic connective tissue disorder that makes pregnancy very painful and debilitating and potentially lifethreatening. Passing this law could force them to take unnecessary risks with their lives and health should their birth control fail...which is very common. Carrying or terminating a pregnancy should be a decision made they make with their doctor, not their legislators.
07-10-2023
John Carr [Iowa Voter]
CON
Someday someone you love will need an abortion. But on Tuesday, 7/11/23, MAGA Republicans will try to ban reproductive rights in Iowa. We deserve the freedom to write our own future and control our own bodies without politicians getting in the way. Why doesnt Kim Reynolds agree? She seems to get her way on everything she wants yet the majority of Iowans, who are in favor of abortion, don't.
07-10-2023
Margaret Youngblood []
CON
To whom it may concern, This sixweek ban on abortion is nothing more than a further attempt at controlling the bodies of Iowa women. You claim to be in the business of saving lives, but this is a lie if you ignore those lives once they're forced into the world by your hand. You respect a deceased person's right to choose whether or not they wish to donate their organs after death, but you won't respect a woman's right to choose whether or not she wants to carry a pregnancy. By your own actions and laws, you are giving any woman of childbearing age less bodily autonomy than a corpse. Furthermore, saying you will only grant abortion in situations of rape or incest tells women that they may only control their own bodies after someone else has violated it first. Abortion must be on demand with no exceptions; make no mistake, if women are denied medically safe abortions, they and the fetuses you are forcing them to carry will die, and your prolife diatribe will have been for nothing. If you pass this bill, you are proving once and for all that "prolife" is a lie, because you don't care if Iowa women die.
07-10-2023
Kyle Coia []
CON
The majority of Iowans and further the majority of Americans do not support this bill or similar bills that take away a womens right to make their own reproductive decisions. This bill, if passed, will immensely harm the state of Iowa and its citizens. Similar bills like this have made maternal outcomes worse, not better in other states, and further drives people away from the state. This bill will further drive medical professionals out of the state with no plan or way to correct. Iowa already has a workforce problem particularly in the medical sector and passing unpopular bills like this over widespread opposition by the majority of Iowans only exacerbates the problem. Those supporting this bill continue to get a number of facts wrong. First, this will not end abortion in the state, it will only end safe and legal abortion in the state. Second, the proposed legislation bans abortion involving the detection of a fetal heartbeat. Every accredited medical organization has stated that the term fetal heartbeat is misleading as what is really being detected is a grouping of cells that are initiating some electrical activity and in no way detecting a functional cardiovascular system or a functional heart. Third, while some religions propose that life begins at conception, that view is not agreed upon by the majority of other religions and further not backed by any sort of historical precedent. Finally, this bill was unconstitutional when it was passed in 2018 and is just as unconstitutional now as it essentially amounts to a full ban in the state.I am encouraging all representatives to vote no on this bill. A no vote protects not only women in the state, but also the states interests from the extremists pushing this bill on all Iowans despite our objections. Those voting in favor of this bill, will forever be known for taking rights away from Iowans and not trusting Iowans to do whats right and make their own healthcare decisions.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
Abortion is healthcare and the government has no business telling women what they can or cannot do with their bodies. This bill will sacrifice women's health and create poverty. Do not bring this bill to a vote.
07-10-2023
Annette Stanton [na]
CON
My choice, my egg, my right!Do You Worship?Do You Hunt?Do You Own a Firearm?Do You Ride a Motorcycle?Do You Smoke?Do You Drink Alcohal?Do You Gamble?Do You Vote?Do You Voice Your Opinion?I will respect your rights, if you respect mine!Have you ever been in a sensitive healthcare situation that called for your choice to abort?If not, then leave this decision to the women who have, are, or will be in that situation. You are not a doctor, You are not me!My Choice, My Egg, My Right!
07-10-2023
Kallen Augustad []
CON
Someone cannot use someone else's body, or body organs, without their ongoing and enthusiastic consent and permission even to save their life. The government cannot force a pregnant person to use their uterus to save a life. Likewise, the government cannot force a person to give blood to save a life. If the government CAN force a person to use their body to save a life, how will this affect living organ donations? Give up a kidney to save a life because you only really "need" one? What about living liver transplants? The liver regenerates, right? Or bone marrow transplant? Or plasma? All of these are examples of what can happen if abortions are illegal based on the point of "life starts at conception, and we need to save and honor life". People should have choice with how their body organs are used.
07-10-2023
Lisa Muccigrosso []
CON
I'm a woman who recently moved to Iowa for work. I am highly educated, I pay my taxes, and I vote in elections. I am the kind of person that Iowa is losing in droves, yet I came here.I did not vote for politicians to decide what kind of health care I can access. I did not vote for the government to decide what decisions I can make for my own body. And I will not vote for any politician who runs on this platform.The concept of small government can appealing. How, then, is restricting abortion access not government overreach? Why is the party in power so adamant to control others and claim it's freedom?I moved here to make a life and community for myself. Please don't make me regret that decision.
07-10-2023
JAMES SANDIN [(Self)]
PRO
Prochoice is not advocacy for healthcare when the care of the fetus' health and life are completely disregarded. Killing a fetus is as unconscionable as it is indefensible, for we were all originally fetal in development, and worthy of care as living beings.
07-10-2023
Karen Hanson []
CON
Women and girls' health rights need to be protected, we need all the choices possible not religious indoctrination.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
There is no world in which the government should be making this decision for women. Lets focus these efforts instead on making life livable for those actually here as fully formed human beings, and stop forcing women to bring a fetus to term without any social safety nets to support that tobe child to ensure a healthy life.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [NA]
CON
This bill is wrong. Reproductive Freedom for all Iowans.
07-10-2023
Eric Saylor []
CON
This bill is appalling in its disregard for womens health and bodily autonomy. It is scientifically ignorantno zygote has a heart at six weeksand ethically incoherent. Women will die if this proposal becomes law, and the blame will be laid squarely at the feet of the Iowa Republican Party.
07-10-2023
Peggy Panosh []
CON
I am against the bill that limits abortions to 6 weeks or otherwise known as the fetal heartbeat bill that Reynolds is introducing tomorrow July 11,2023. Women should have the right to make their own healthcare decisions without government interference.
07-10-2023
Polly Antonelli []
CON
Please allow for freedom of beliefs regarding when "life" begins. This is one of the founding principles of the United States. "Fetal heartbeat" is a obfuscation. As used by the Republicans/ultraconservatives what they are really referring to is electrical activity among cells that will eventually form the heart. At six weeks from conception there is no heart and therefore no "heartbeat". Fetal viability is a much more appropriate milestone. However, allowances must be made for the health/life of the mother. No one should be required to risk their life for any thing or anyone.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Our liberties we prize, our rights we will maintain.This bill represents unacceptable legislative and executive overreach, impeding upon the sovereignty and free agency of all Iowa women. The passing of this bill would be indicative of a massive cultural shift for our state, solidifying the voices who do not speak on behalf of our citizens. This bill should, at the very least, be decided by a statewide referendum in order to affirm the stance and beliefs of the people of Iowa. Prove youre not an authoritarian body and embrace democracy in action. Prove youre not a tyrant.
07-10-2023
Diana Henry [none]
CON
In the USA, which is supposed to be a democracy, and as such, women do not need flagrant regulation of their bodily autonomy. This special session seeks to control women's lives and is an act of domestic terrorism on par with what happens in Iran and Afghanistan. In other words, the state wants to divest women of their personal freedoms.
07-10-2023
Kathy Meyer [Retired teacher]
CON
Keep Womens health care safe and free of interference from the government. Reproductive rights should be respected. A majority of Iowans dont want a six week abortion ban. Dont ram this through and disrespect women and their rights to make these important personal decisions with their doctors.
07-10-2023
Kelly Wells Sittig []
CON
Every Iowan deserves reproductive freedom and access to a full range of safe reproductive health services, including abortion. This access is a fundamental right and integral to the health and wellbeing of individuals and to the broader public health. I deserve reproductive freedom. My daughter deserves reproductive freedom. All Iowans deserve reproductive freedom.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
PRO
I'm in favor of any bill that restricts abortion. Our society wants to empower women what could possibly be more awe inspiring, empowering, and brave than giving birth to another human? Giving another human a chance to live is a gift and a weighty responsibility. I believe life begins even before the heartbeat. My votes will always side with choosing life.
07-10-2023
Amber Goodrich [NA]
CON
I believe all Iowans have the right to make our own decisions about our bodies, lives and futures free from government control. Iowa families not politicians should be able to decide what medical decisions are best for them. I ask you to take a stand for the rights of your constituents like me and vote NO on any abortion restrictions in the upcoming special session.As a Certified NurseMidwife, I provide full scope OBGYN care to the women of Iowa. I am here to tell you first hand that most women are not using abortion as birth control, but if they were its none of the judicial systems business. Most of them are folks who truly do want a baby, have tried hard for a baby, and now the baby has birth defects that are not compatible with life or the mothers life is in danger. I would like to share a couple of stories that come to mind. The first story was a couple who already went through two traumatic losses. They tried hard to conceive and got pregnant with the use of Femara, a medication used for infertility. They thought everything was going smoothly until their 20 week ultrasound, when it was found their baby had a neural tube defect that was not compatible with life. If the baby was not stillborn, it would not have lived long after delivery causing unnecessary harm/pain to himself and his parents. Not to mention the thousands of dollars of healthcare costs that create a financial burden for the parents. The second story includes a hard working couple who had no problems conceiving, but had recurrent miscarriage. The birther went through three miscarriages back to back. She got to her 12 week visit and chose to do genetic testing, which returned positive for trisomy 21. She had confirmatory testing with an amniocentesis, and was devastated to learn about the diagnosis. She and her partner knew they did not have the bandwidth to take care of a child with significant special needs, so they decided to terminate the pregnancy at that time. Imagine the amount of discord being forced to carry a pregnancy she didnt want would have caused! Being strapped with the emotional and financial burden when it all could have been prevented if bodily autonomy existed. If this law gets passed, I am petrified for what is to come for Iowans. This includes myself, my daughter, my patients, and the rest of my friends and family who are female. I urge you to listen to the constituents and fight to protect bodily autonomy in Iowa. Aside from the detrimental damage of what these laws can do for constituents, there will also be downstream effects of losing OBGYN providers, like myself, so they can go practice in a state in which they can provide best evidence based care as outlined by our professions practice guidelines (ACOG and ACNM). Iowa is already in a maternal healthcare crisis with one of the highest maternal mortality rates in the state, which, I must add, impacts black folks at 6x the rate of white counterparts. This law would affect those with healthcare disparities already and make the maternal healthcare crisis more severe. I am begging you, please, do something to stop this madness.
07-10-2023
Ellyn Nitchals-Kellner []
CON
Iowans deserve access to the full spectrum of reproductive health. Safe and legal abortion is a lifesaving medical treatment and the government should not limit a person's healthcare options. This decision lies between pregnant people and their doctors. The majority of Iowans support access to legal abortion and this government should not infringe on these rights.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Our liberties we prize, our rights we will maintain.This bill represents unacceptable legislative and executive overreach, impeding upon the sovereignty and free agency of all Iowa women. The passing of this bill would be indicative of a massive cultural shift for our state, solidifying the voices who do not speak on behalf of our citizens. This bill should, at the very least, be decided by a statewide referendum in order to affirm the stance and beliefs of the people of Iowa. Prove youre not an authoritarian body and embrace democracy in action. Prove youre not a tyrant.
07-10-2023
Timothy Smith []
CON
My wife and I are actively trying to have a second child. Even while watching for it, we were not aware she was pregnant until 6.5 weeks, because her cycle doesn't fit in a neat little box. What if we weren't trying? When would we have known? I guess it doesn't matter, because it would already be too late under a 6 week ban. But that's okay... we want another child. Except, at 12 weeks our second ultrasound revealed swelling around the neck consistent with cystic hygroma, which gives us an 80% likelihood of serious complications. We won't be able to rule out some of the worst of those complications until around 18 to 20 weeks. Even under the current 22 week ban, which according to our doctor is more like 21 in practice, our window of choice is narrow. 6 weeks in comparison is laughably cruel.
07-10-2023
Joshua Ryan Borden []
CON
Please protect human rights and do not advance this bill. Womens rights in Iowa would be set back by four generations if this law passes. If fully grown, living, breathing, thinking and feeling human beings lose their bodily freedom and autonomy, they are losing a fundamental human right.Passing this law means enslaving women to unwelcome pregnancies and childbirth.
07-10-2023
Emily Babcock []
CON
Abortions are a medical necessity and it should not be up to the government to regulate this.
07-10-2023
Medea Saunders []
CON
This is harmful to women. It is bad science. This creates barriers for providers and patients who need care.
07-10-2023
John Tovar [N/A]
CON
To clear this health Care (Abortion) situation up once and for all times, Iowa should have a referendum on having or not having abortions on the next national election. Republicans should not be wasting money on special sessions for such matters. The majority of Iowans are for allowing women to have their freedom.
07-10-2023
Thacker Kester []
CON
The choice to abort should be between the parents of the fetus, not the government.
07-10-2023
Elle Kokkinos []
CON
Hello, This law will seriously impact the health of women and the doctors who serve them. I cannot condone this bill and it will result in me not fulfilling the oath I took before becoming a practitioner. I vehemently am against it. Iowa will lose many great physicians to other sane states in the country if this law is passed. Please reconsider and rule on the side of common sense and decency.
07-10-2023
Heather Rinderknecht []
CON
I dont believe anyone but me and my healthcare provider should decide what I do medically. The decision to have a child is mine and mine along.
07-10-2023
Judah Richardson []
CON
The rate of people in the US dying of pregnancyrelated causes more than doubled over two decades. Forcing women to have children is literally sentencing them to death. Do not pass this bill.
07-10-2023
Elizabeth Baird []
CON
The values of individual freedom and choice should guide whether one gives birth to a child, not the choices made by politicians. I oppose any attempt by Iowa legislators to take away the ability of Iowans to make our own, very personal, reproductive choices.
07-10-2023
Jacki Kuepker []
CON
I support the right to choose. As do the majority of your constituents. Ill consider supporting the bill when it includes mandatory sterilization of all males who have caused an unplanned or unwanted pregnancy. Appalling? Of course it is and now you know how we feel.
07-10-2023
Greg Hankins []
CON
A woman and her health team are the only entities who should be allowed to make decisions regarding their health and wellbeing.
07-10-2023
Laura H []
CON
Please vote no for HSB 255. Healthcare decisions should remain between the patient and their doctor, without question. These restrictions on womens health are government overreach and completely unreasonable. It will drive well qualified doctors out of Iowa where OB/maternal healthcare is already lacking. Also, if our goal is less abortions, lets start with providing Medicaid coverage for 12 months postpartum, not putting extra restrictions on SNAP benefit qualifications, adequately funding our public schools, and passing common sense gun reform to help all Iowans feel safe, secure, and confident in their ability to welcome a baby into this world.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am a married 37yo woman who has had two very scary traumatic pregnancies. If I got pregnant again it would be at risk to my life. We are not actively trying obviously, therefor there is a chance we wouldn't know we were pregnant until it was too late if this bill passes. My life would be at risk and my two children already living here on this earth could end up without a mother because of this bill. Do not take away Iowan women's reproductive rights. This bill will end up KILLING women. It will end up making many more women infertile. Leave this decision between a woman and her doctor.
07-10-2023
Kari Harland []
CON
I am writing to express my strong opposition to this bill. All people need and deserve access to the full range of reproductive health services including abortion. Banning access to this critical component of healthcare will delay care, keep individuals from seeking followup treatments when needed, and will make clinicians question and put off treatment of a multitude of pregnancy complications (including ectopic pregnancy, which is life threatening) for fear of legal repercussions.There is no "heartbeat" at 6 weeks, as the heart has not developed yet. This is a definition fabricated by the antichoice contingency and not based on medicine or science. This absurd definition will outlaw almost all abortions in our state, as many people do not know they are pregnant until they are past this marker of tissue development.The majority of Iowans support the right to abortion. Individuals deserve to have bodily autonomy and to make medical decisions in consultation with trusted medical staff not via fiat from politicians.This bill is an outrageous attempt to control Iowans' bodies, and submit us to the religious will of Conservative Christians, whose religious opinions should not be (and legally cannot be) forced on an entire state.I implore our elected officials to vote down this dangerous bill.
07-10-2023
Tanya Keith [Hat Trick Renovation]
CON
I am a business owner in Iowa and I required an abortion to terminate a wanted pregnancy that failed to progress and failed to miscarry. Living for even a week with a doomed pregnancy broke my heart and left me unable to care for my living children and business. Abortion saved my life and sanity and allowed me to heal so I could carry my now 8 year old child. This is not something that should be legislated, it is bodily autonomy and a decision between the pregnant person and their doctor. I don't want to grow my business in a place that won't allow my children freedom over their bodies.
07-10-2023
Katarina Perovic and David Gooblar []
CON
The proposed law strips women (and others who can get pregnant) of their fundamental right to take care of their own bodies. It is a disgraceful and terrifying act of governmental overreach, a repressive and misogynistic measure that will serve to separate those in the state with full citizenship from those whose autonomy is at the mercy of smallminded, absolutist zealots. This is the Taliban come to Iowa.If this law passes, we would immediately question our future in this state; as parents of two girls, it would be hard to justify choosing to let them grow up here. We're sure that such a law would make many people think twice before moving to Iowa. Legislators should stand up for the people they represent and vote no on this bill.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Leave women and doctors to decide their care together.
07-10-2023
Nick [N/A]
PRO
I strongly urge you to support HSB 255 to protect the rights of the defenseless, unborn lives. The prolife movement is the most important human rights cause today. How many more children have to be brutally murdered before this barbaric practice is stopped? I urge the elected officials of Iowa to support Governor Reynolds and HSB 255.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Our liberties we prize, our rights we will maintain.This bill represents unacceptable legislative and executive overreach, impeding upon the sovereignty and free agency of all Iowa women. The passing of this bill would be indicative of a massive cultural shift for our state, solidifying the voices who do not speak on behalf of our citizens. This bill should, at the very least, be decided by a statewide referendum in order to affirm the stance and beliefs of the people of Iowa. Prove youre not an authoritarian body and embrace democracy in action. Prove youre not a tyrant.
07-10-2023
Daryl Spivey [Citizen - resident]
CON
I do not want the Iowa legislature to pass further abortion restrictions.
07-10-2023
Rachel Wobeter []
CON
The majority of Iowan's (60% in fact) want abortion to be legal in most or all cases. Therefore, the proposed bill is not the will of the people.Even among those who say abortion should be illegal in all or most cases, 66% support exceptions for rape or incest and 75% support an exception if the pregnant persons life is at risk. If someone does not want to have an abortion for any reason, they are not forced to have one. If someone wants to have an abortion it is their right to have one. The fact that some people's religion or personal preferences are to not have abortions is not a reason to take this right away from everyone. No one should force anyone to be pregnant against their will. Abortion should never be a political decision, it is a personal and medical decision. I'd like Iowa's legislators to spend time creating a healthy environment for those who are here living in the state everyday, right now. Raise the standard of living, for those who are in front of you right now. That is what we are waiting for.
07-10-2023
Kristen Friedrichs []
CON
We must maintain our rights to health care which includes abortion. Women should have the right to choose what is right for them while consulting with their physician. The government should not interfere with anyone's health care decisions. Vote no to this bill. A majority of Iowans oppose this bill and you represent Iowans.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Na]
CON
Taking away access to abortion is taking away our rights.
07-10-2023
Kristen Stewart [Planned Parenthood]
CON
It is extremely unjust to take womens rights away. Absolutely no one should have any right to say what we can and cant do with our own bodies, especially where our health is concerned. Many health issues arise well after a heartbeat is detected with the mother or the child. Everyone says this is a life and death matter but womens lives arent even being considered. Does no one care that women will die when they start turning to illegal methods that are unsafe and cause serious infection? The other issue is the already thousands of unwanted children all over the country that get stuck in foster homes, abused and neglected never to be adopted. I am not an advocate of using abortion as birth control but who is going to care for all of the unwanted children? I am scared for my daughter and all the other young ladies! How far will this go before all of our rights as women are taken away?
07-10-2023
Nicole Brokloff, MD []
CON
I am strongly opposed to HSB 225 as it criminalizes physicians for practicing EvidenceBased Medicine. Medical treatments and procedures should be a decision made between the patient and their physician.
07-10-2023
Lila J. Sybesma []
CON
I'm not prochoice. I follow more of a middle ground, as a "onesizefitsall" decision makes no sense to me. I'm 64yearold Christian woman, mother of three, and endured a highrisk (unexpected) pregnancy myself. Personally even though my life was at risk I wouldn't have gone through an abortion. However, I don't think legislators should get in the middle of a woman's decision, as that decision is between them, their doctor, and their God. I hope if your plan is to vote "yes" is to do so after input from those you represent, and not before. This rushed midsummer vote denies Iowans a voice. I cry foul. Here are some of the reasons women may choose abortion. Whereas I don't agree with all of these reasons, it isn't my body or health we are talking about. Health complications: Some women may seek an abortion due to serious health complications that could jeopardize their own lives or the viability of the pregnancy. Fetal abnormalities: If prenatal testing reveals severe fetal abnormalities or genetic disorders, a woman may choose to terminate the pregnancy. Relationship instability: Women in unstable relationships, experiencing domestic violence, or facing pressure from partners may decide to terminate a pregnancy. Rape or incest: The baby was conceived through terrifying circumstances. Financial constraints: Economic instability, lack of financial resources, or inability to adequately support a child may lead a woman to consider an abortion. Age and readiness: Young women or teenagers who are not emotionally, mentally, or financially prepared to raise a child may opt for an abortion. Existing family responsibilities: Women who are already caring for multiple children or have dependents with special needs may feel overwhelmed and unable to handle another child. Failed contraception: Despite using contraception methods correctly, unplanned pregnancies can occur, and women may choose to have an abortion if it aligns with their reproductive goals. Personal choice: Ultimately, a woman may choose to have an abortion for personal reasons, as it is her right to make decisions about her own body and future. Education and career goals: Pursuing higher education, career advancement, or professional development may prompt a woman to seek an abortion to prioritize her educational or career aspirations. Unplanned or unwanted pregnancies: Whether due to failed contraception, contraceptive misuse, or other circumstances, some women may simply feel unprepared or unready to become a parent and decide to have an abortion.I will pray for all of you as you determine the best recourse for women and their families. Lila Sybesma
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Abortion is a deeply personal issue. The state should not attempt for the second time to ban abortions. Stop wasting taxpayers money. The state should not be legislating medical decisions.
07-10-2023
Terence Staed [Concerned Citizen to Support Life]
PRO
All humans have a right to make choices, and also responsibility for there decision. Dont engage in intercourse if you are inprepared or able to be responsible for the possibility of becoming pregnant, or in the case of male, impregnating a woman. Abortion is murder, period. Abortion is not a choice, it is an act of selfishness and the destruction of an unborn that has no means to defend or represent his or herself. The unborn child must be protected, that is the responsibility of every human.Thank you,Terry Staed
07-10-2023
Darin Johnston []
CON
I stand strongly opposed to this bill.On August 30, 2021, in a series of tweets, Governor Reynolds stated this:"As Ive said all along, I believe and trust in Iowans to make the best health decisions for themselves and their families. Iowas democratically elected legislature endorsed that view as well when they passed a law to support a parents right to decide whats best for their own children. In Iowa, we will continue to support individual liberty over government mandates."Has something changed? The Governor is correct. We as citizens, not the government, are able to make those best decisions for our health.I urge a no vote on this bill.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Constituent ]
CON
Mother.By choice.For choice.Health care decisions are private between a person and their healthcare provider, not the government. Bodily autonomy is a a fundamental right. A person cannot be forced to donate a kidney or blood in order to save another persons life. In fact; not even in death are we forced to donate an organ.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/a]
CON
Majority of Iowans do not support this, so why not represent the ones that elected you. This is wrong. You are not doctors.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [N/a]
CON
This decision is not the decision of the voters or government. This a personal decision that a woman has to make with the advice of a medical professional.
07-10-2023
Abigail Mancuso [Iowa Constituent ]
CON
As a women's health physician in Iowa specializing in infertility care I oppose this bill. A premedical student planning to stay in Iowa to practice medicine just told me today she was not sure she would pursue ObGyn given the current restrictions being considered on women's health care. Passage of this bill WILL lead to a decrease in women's health care providers in our state, and Iowa cannot afford to loose more providers as many women already do not have access to care. Many patients, even those with highly desired pregnancies such as those pursing fertility treatments, need abortions. Abortion restrictions are not supported by Iowa constituents and passage of this bill will lead to harm for Iowa women.
07-10-2023
Shannon Patrick []
CON
This bill reveals a staggering disrespect for Iowa's women, families, and doctors. Anyone who thinks that abortion is an easy, blackandwhite decision should read about or talk to people who have actually had to get abortions. These are very hard choices where the details are critical, and believing that the legislature can make such decisions better than the people involved is an act of monumental arrogance.
07-10-2023
Lisa Kukral []
CON
I oppose the attempts being made to limit Iowa women's access to SAFE and LEGAL abortion. Decisions of this nature should be made by women and their trusted advisorsNOT LEGISLATORS.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Disappointing behavior of someone who did not get her way. The people have the spoken the courts have decided. A political agenda that does not play well for our governor.
07-10-2023
Marcos Lester McSweeney []
CON
I urge you not to pass this harsh restriction of medical care.
07-10-2023
Ella Trannel []
CON
This bill is harmful to young women like myself and will prevent people from wanting to stay in our state.
07-10-2023
Megan Day [Personally]
CON
This will impact all of Iowas women and girls, regardless of their stance on abortion. There will undoubtedly be stress and undue burden when the state declares their wombs not to be of their own body. We could expand access to birth control, offer young men reversible vasectomies, extend postpartum care, but instead this is an urgent priority to pass before the next election cycle. Young girls will harm themselves before being force to carry a pregnancy that they dont desire. In all of history, women have always found a way. Youre just making this incredibly dangerous.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I strongly oppose this bill. Abortion care is healthcare, and restricting it to these extremes is harmful. If passed, this bill will impact lowincome and minority women in disproportionate amounts. The requirement of a police report to justify exceptions for rape and incest is also problematic, as victims of abuse do not always feel safe reporting the harm done to them.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Abortion is health care and legislators shouldnt infringe on our medical care rights.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I stand against an abortion ban, like a majority of Iowans.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
We must protect a womans right to choose!
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The older I get, the less Iowa feels like home. Leave reproductive healthcare (i.e. abortion) between patients and their healthcare providers. Im writing this comment while nursing my three month old daughter who will likely grow up with less rights than I had in this state as a child.
07-10-2023
Pamela Stalnaker [Private citizen]
CON
A woman should have ownership of her own body. To not allow her medical decisions over her own body either is an act of slavery or treating her like a child. An adult woman is neither of these. I am totally against any regulation prohibiting a woman control over her own body.
07-10-2023
David Gerard Beeman []
CON
While I am personally and religiously opposed to abortion, it is clear that there is no consensus on the "right to life" for a fetus (as there is say for murder). By moving to outlaw abortion, the State is inherently choosing one religion (a subset of Christianity) over others who do not oppose abortion (e.g., Judaism, Islamic, agnostic). Doing so is a clear violation of the ideals of the United States. Until there is a religious and societal consensus, outlawing abortion is one religious group imposing its morality on others, and that is wholly inappropriate.
07-10-2023
David Beeman []
CON
While I am personally and religiously opposed to abortion, it is clear that there is no consensus on the "right to life" for a fetus (as there is say for murder). By moving to outlaw abortion, the State is inherently choosing one religion (a subset of Christianity) over others who do not oppose abortion (e.g., Judaism, Islamic, agnostic). Doing so is a clear violation of the ideals of the United States. Until there is a religious and societal consensus, outlawing abortion is one religious group imposing its morality on others, and that is wholly inappropriate.
07-10-2023
Jessica Roman []
CON
Abortion will always exist. The question is, will it exist legally and safely, and if not, how many women will die? Their blood is on your hands.
07-10-2023
Lauren Friedrichs []
CON
As an Iowan I do not support this bill. Everyone should be able to make their own medical decisions along with their doctors.
07-10-2023
Katie Hines [Citizen]
CON
I fully support bodily autonomy. Restricting abortion access hurts women's physical health, financial health, and overall happiness. The following are statistic concluded in The Turnaway Study: The cost of denying women access to abortion by Diana Greene Foster that followed over 1000 women for 10 years who were either able to receive an abortion or who were not able. 1. Women who were able to receive an abortion were more likely to stay employed and live above the federal poverty line.2. Women denied abortions were more likely to be on welfare, declare bankruptcy, and default on loans.3. Women who were denied an abortion were less likely to complete post secondary school (29% who were denied, compared to 72% who received an abortion).4. Women who were able to receive an abortion had overall better physical health over the course of the study than those denied.5. Women who received an abortion had a greater chance of having a wanted pregnancy and being in a good romantic relationship over the course of the study.These statistics show that access to abortion is critical for the financial, physical, and emotional health of women. These benefits also lead to a better economy.I have had friends who have had unplanned pregnancies, some have chosen abortion and some have chosen to continue their pregnancy. No matter the decision every single one of them would say they made the right choice. Women need to be trusted because they know what is best for them and their families.
07-10-2023
Amy Adams [self]
CON
When Roe was overturned, abortion opponents became more emboldened than ever, and across the country we saw trigger bans go into place and countless states pass near total abortion bans regardless of circumstance, pushing women toward healthcare catastrophe because they couldnt receive the medical they wanted or needed. Despite overwhelming opposition to an abortion ban in Iowa, Republicans are hellbent on wasting taxpayer money on a special session in the middle of summer with little public input to strip the rights and freedoms away from half of the citizens of this state. If Republicans are so confident that this bill represents the will of the people, why are they refusing to put an amendment in front of voters? Poll after poll shows that the public supports access to abortion care, especially in cases of rape and incest. Over 60% of Iowans support the right and freedom of an individual to choose an abortion. That number jumps to over 80% when the mothers life is at risk. If Republican lawmakers wanted "prolife" policies, we would have expanded Medicaid coverage for new mothers up to one year and we would not have OBGYN deserts in the state where rural women especially have to travel further distances for care. This bill makes Iowa more dangerous for anyone who becomes pregnant. Whether it is your mother, sister, wife, partner, daughter, or friend, someone you know and love has had or will have an abortion in their lifetime.
07-10-2023
Madonna Backstrom []
CON
I demand reproductive freedom. Keep abortion safe and legal in Iowa. You are not doctors therefore you have no business making decisions about my health and wellness. ABORTION IS HEALTHCARE.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [the Elder Circle]
CON
women's health care is a right. There is not enough room here for me to express all of my thoughts about the issue just let me say that our representatives should listen to their constituents. We elected you do do what we want not what your small minds conceive.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Our liberties we prize, our rights we will maintain.This bill represents unacceptable legislative and executive overreach, impeding upon the sovereignty and free agency of all Iowa women. The passing of this bill would be indicative of a massive cultural shift for our state, solidifying the voices who do not speak on behalf of our citizens. This bill should, at the very least, be decided by a statewide referendum in order to affirm the stance and beliefs of the people of Iowa. Prove youre not an authoritarian body and embrace democracy in action. Prove youre not a tyrant.
07-10-2023
Sara McGrew [None - Private Citizen from Iowa ]
CON
With the news that Iowa is reconvening for a special session to try and ban abortion here, I am outraged and had to take this moment to stand up for women in my state. And as a Christian woman who has lived her whole life in this state, I want my voice heard and on the record and you all should vote no to HSB 255. I am a Christian woman and I am prochoice.Just because I am prochoice does not mean I am proabortion. In fact, in my heart I dont believe I could ever have one, but that is MY right to make that choice if I ever would need to face that decision. Not the governments right. My right to make an informed decision with my full consent and knowledge from my doctor. As a woman, I believe no one should get to make that choice for me and it is every womans right to choose what is best for her and have autonomy over her body. YoBut you may ask how can I be prochoice and a Christian?Well, Im a progressive Christian. I love Jesus.I actually have read and listened to His teachings. I also think He would be prochoice too and fight for many liberal values.You do realize He was a radical who fought against the status quo, imploring His followers to heal the sick, feed the hungry, uplift the underdog, distribute wealth, welcome the stranger in your land, etc. Or arent you familiar with the Gospels of the New Testament that throw out the old laws many quote when speaking of abortion? Jesus also said nothing about abortions but does focus the core of His teachings on the ability to love thy neighbor as yourself, help those less fortunate with you, act with kindness, empathy, and equality.So tell me, Governor Reynolds and Iowa legislators who are excited by this proposed bill: are you prolife or are you just pro birth? Do you love the fetus just when it is in the womb? Do you love it just when you think of it as a white cis gendered Christian middle class baby and youre protecting its innocence?What happens when it is born? Wheres the bills for affordable childcare, better healthcare, better education, more affordable housing to actually take care of the child (and the mother) once its born? What happens if that child is an LGBTQ+ youth or born to trans parents? Or what happens if it has a skin color or religion or background different than your own? Or heck, what happens to protect it while its still IN the womb?Do you know how much an ultrasound and prenatal care is these days? Let alone the actual cost of labor and delivery, lack of paid maternity leave benefits, support for new parents and so much more. Go back to those Gospels if you think this is really what Jesus would want. I can help: try Romans 14 as a good place to begin. Or maybe realize that being prolife life doesnt mean you are prohumanity like many think it does. Maybe this all really is about controlling women and their bodies. Women deserve the right to choose. So let them. Give them the freedom of choice to follow their values, because being pro choice does not mean you are pro abortion, and vote no on this proposed bill.
07-10-2023
Joan Decker [Iowa Citizen]
CON
It is past time the Governor & her representatives stop cramming their personal opinions onto the citizens of Iowa. They are ignoring what the majority of their constitutes believe & pass archaic laws based on hate & ignorance.They have had no empathy for the health & wellbeing for children once they are born. They have passed laws restricting nutrition & Healthcare security for children & their mothers. Interfering with the rights of women to access Healthcare should be criminal. Politicians should have NO right to make decisions on what is best for someone health except for their own body.
07-10-2023
Andrea Solomon []
CON
I am one of the 61% of Iowans who support access to abortion. Abortion is healthcare and the decisions about ones body and health lies with the patient and their doctor not a legislative body and certainly not the Governor.
07-10-2023
Wendy Lingo []
CON
I demand reproductive freedom for all women in MY state, Iowa
07-10-2023
Evy Raes []
CON
This is a travesty. Ive heard so many statements of freedom and liberty from our governor. It is clear that these system only apply to those who look like her, believe like her, and who voted for her. Women should be the only people who make decisions about their own bodies. Prolife has come to mean pro fetus not pro life, as social safety net programs have been cut or defunded in Iowa. Trust women. Leave your religious beliefs at the church door.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am against this ban on a woman's right to reproductive freedom. The majority of Iowan's support abortion rights and this extremist legislation will hurt Iowans, not help them. Focus on solving mental health issues, provide mandatory parental leave, provide better access to child care and close the wealth inequity. Then, your alleged concern for the unborn won't be so obviously a political stunt.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Self]
CON
This bill is completely against giving women the freedom they need. Religion should not go over our civil liberties. This is not a Christian state. The Iowa interfaith board unanimously disagrees with this bill as well. Please. Do the right thing. Vote against this. It's horrible that you're giving our trash more freedom than women.
07-10-2023
Nichole Eden []
CON
Increasing restrictions on abortion will put the lives of Iowans at risk. Please vote to protect bodily autonomy, choice, and safety.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [Self]
CON
This is the most egregious violation of human rights you have tried to push. It is sad the way you are attacking basic human rights, and how you are denying people their right to autonomy. Shame on you. You are not on the right side of history.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Someone I love will need an abortion one day. But tomorrow, MAGA Republicans will try to ban reproductive rights in Iowa. We deserve the freedom to write our own future without politicians getting in the way. Republicans were elected to do the job of Iowans not their personal agenda when it comes to Abortion rights. They are going against the majority and supporting the extremist. Politicians should not be making medical decisions for women & girls in Iowa.
07-10-2023
Nicole Thurman [None]
CON
Healthcare should be a choice between a patient and their doctor, nothing the state should be involved in.
07-10-2023
Laura Bergus []
CON
Banning abortion is against the will of the majority of Iowans. Abortion will always happen. It should be safe, accessible, and legal.
07-10-2023
Adam Hoffman [Iowa Registered Voter]
PRO
I am unapologetically prolife and I believe it to be in the best interest our state to pass this legislation.
07-10-2023
Mike Andreski []
PRO
A mere 50 years ago in the Iowa Senate chamber, my exmotherinLaw, Republican State Senator W. Charlene Conklin advocated for women to be able to control their reproductive rights. This week, in this same Senate chamber, the Iowa legislature is having a special session to put severe restrictions on the ability to have a safe, medically supervised abortion. A right for which she fought AS A REPUBLICAN.Charlene wore many hats, wife, mother, grandmother, family historian, speech therapist, and politician. She was the first woman elected to the Iowa Senate on her own merit, not as a courtesy to the widow of a Senator. She was a committed Republican until her passing last fall.Early life experiences witnessing the consequences of women not controlling their reproductive lives led her to her prochoice position.While she and I agreed on few things politically besides womens equality and reproductive choice, I always respected her as having impeccable integrity. Even as we became exrelatives, she still wanted me to call her mom.Her prochoice positions in the early 1970s were not politically convenient, but were deeply held, along with her passion for womens rights witnessed by her many travels in support of the ERA in the late 70s and early 80s.While a failing heart took her from us last fall, I am sure that if she were still with us today that she would be heartbroken to see the Iowa Senate consider limiting the autonomy of women in Iowa. It is an ironic coincidence that this Republican Iowa State Senator was laid to rest in a family cemetery near her hometown of Griswold last Saturday.In memory of Senator W Charlene Conklin, my mom, I ask you to reject this illconceived bill.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
These bills are fascist and need to be shut down. Legislation shouldnt be in control of my Jody or any other womans body. This should be between us and our doctors only. 6 weeks is not even enough time for most people to even know they are pregnant. If you call the dr to be seen, they tell you to call back between 810 weeks or will only schedule that far out anyway. This is absurd. Kim Renyolds is destroying this state and is very dangerous for Iowans.
07-10-2023
Tana Friesth Perry []
CON
I am an OBGYN currently practicing in Council Bluffs, IA, serving a large portion of the southwestern Iowa population and beyond. This bill will have extremely dire consequences for women in the state of Iowa including women who NEVER seek or have an abortion..or are never even pregnant for that matter. Iowa is ranked lowest in the nation of number of OBGYN per capita. We cannot sink any lower but yet I anticipate the number of obgyns in our state will only decrease if this bill passes. It was already a challenge to recruit to our state before the fall of Roe V Wade and now if an abortion ban passes in Iowa it will be nearly impossible. Many labor and delivery units have closed due to lack of ability to cover the unit with obgyns. Some are still desperately recruiting and I do mean desperate I have seen sign on bonuses for $100,000 for some places. But for many obgyns there is literally no sum of money that they would accept to work in a state with a near total abortion ban. They simply would not. I know many legislators think that this will just mean that the state will recruit pro life obgyns. However the extremely vast majority of obgyns and especially young obgyns are pro choice. They will never even look in Iowas direction when looking for a job. As an obgyn , especially one that sees a large rural population throughout SW Iowa, I do much more than provide care for pregnancy. I also provide gynecological care as well as primary care for many women. Iowa cannot afford to lose these healthcare resources. I of course oppose the very nature of this bill as well. It is harmful to women, harmful to the patientprovider relationship and is not based in science. Pregnancy decisions should be between a patient and her doctor. Not a legislator who has never taken a reproductive physiology class. No matter what exemptions are written into a law, medicine never falls perfectly within these boundaries. That is why I have trained for years to become an obgyn to provide the best possible care to my patients.
07-10-2023
Emily K. HIll MD []
CON
I would like to register my strong opposition to this bill. I am an Ob/Gyn physician and as a doctor taking care of women, the decisions I make with patients about their health, including pregnancy, should be private. There are many dangers to pregnancy and complexities of bearing a child that one is forever responsible for so this decision should be left to the individual woman. This is not something appropriate to legislate. This law does not represent the support of individuals rights and freedoms and is dangerous for women's health and wellbeing.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Keep the state out of my medical exam room. My decisions are for my own conscience. Do not force physicians to deny procedures a woman may need to provide for her wellbeing.Unplanned pregnancies can trigger huge mental health issues and these restrictions have no support for women grappling with unplanned pregnancy.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Governor Reynolds and fellow Republicans please stay out of the female uterus. You absolutely have no business to decide what I do with my body. If you don't want an abortion, by all means don't get one, but don't force your decision down my throat. I am so sick of you all talking out of both sides of your mouth, you say you "protect children," up until that child realizes their gay and then boom you pretty much disregard them. Please, please don't make abortions next to impossible to get because of your belief. You belief is just that your belief, keep it that way.
07-10-2023
Gabriela [Individual]
CON
Calling a special session in the middle of summer for the sole purpose of stripping Iowans of the liberties they prize is not only unprecedented but shows the drastic lengths powerhungry politicians will take to pass deeply unpopular policies.No one else can know a persons situation their health, wellbeing, risks, and future. Abortion is a deeply personal decision. Every person deserves the right to control their reproductive health, and their future. Politicians should not put themselves in the middle of Iowans health care or their decisions.Any ban or restriction on abortion is harmful and takes away Iowans abilities to control their body and future.The right to an abortion is supported by an overwhelming majority of Americans, including Iowans. * 61% of Iowans including Republicans, Democrats, and Independents support access to safe and legal abortion.Abortion is essential health care, a constitutional right, and a human right.DO NOT VOTE FOR THIS BILL! STOP PLAYING POLITICS WITH OUR HEALTH CARE!
07-10-2023
Dan Johnson []
CON
Im a lifelong Iowa resident, former Catholic and even the Grand Knight of my college council of The Knights of Columbus, so Ive walked in ProLife rallies.. But I also have two bright daughters and my first granddaughter is due next month. This abortion ban is an extreme measure thatll inflict major damage against not just the women of Iowa, but the state as a whole. Weve got to vote this down or well all regret it.
07-10-2023
Harold L MIhm [self]
CON
I very much am against the "fetal heart beat". I was told by one Republican legislator that this legislation is approached this way because if it was brought before the voters it would be rejected by a large margin. I thought legislators were supposed to represent the will of the people. Many of the individuals who want to tell women what they can and cannot do with bodies are the same people who rejected covid vaccination. "Noone can tell me what to do with my body"
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Abortion is healthcare. It is unconstitutional and irresponsible to take it away. This is a complex medical decision that needs to be made between a woman and her medical team.
07-10-2023
RICHARD A EDWARDS []
CON
The new proposal does not support what the majority of Iowans have consistently indicated in the polls. The majority of Iowans do NOT support the restictions to reproductive freedom (i.e., abortion restrictions such as what is being proposed in this special session).
07-10-2023
Lisa Schlesinger []
CON
Let girls and women use their own wisdom and control their own bodies. Thank you.
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Why does the Governor insist on going against the majority of Iowans? Id call her an ACTIVIST Governor! You are trying to pass a bill that only a select few people/groups want. Its about time you work together to educate men and women on respect for each other. Or maybe its time to look at castrating men so women dont have unwanted pregnancies. The MEN are the problem here not the women. Deal with the problem!!!!
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Abortion is a woman's own personal health decision. It is private decision that is made based on what is best for her and the circumstances of her life at that time. It is a big responsibility and is not taken lightly.In fact, abortions in the United States have actually been decreasing at a steady rate since 1981. Additionally,93% of abortions happen within the first trimester, as soon as a woman determines that she is pregnant. Most abortions that are completed later in the pregnancy are due to extreme health situations with either the mother or the fetus. These statistics show that women take the responsibility to choose abortion very seriously.Furthermore, most citizens agree that women are very capable of making a decision to use abortion as over 60% support a woman's right to choose. Taking that right from them sends a very negative message to both women and those 60% that support them.
07-10-2023
Patricia R. Coffie []
CON
Do not vote for this.PRO CHOICE!
07-10-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I find it quite interesting that Republicans are all about freedom, except when it comes to women being able to make choices about their own bodies and healthcare. It is also quite ironic that 70% of women in Iowa are against banning abortion. It is going to make things more difficult for doctors worrying about whether they have the authority to decide what point a pregnant womans life is in danger. What about the woman who has a pregnancy which is not viable and must carry a baby to term with it not having any chance to survive once it is born? It is sickening that some legislators do not think about the real people who will be affected directly by this bill and not listening to the will of the people that have elected them. None of us have an idea what it is like to walk in someone else's shoes and some don't care about things unless it affects them personally. I believe you should also make the male legally responsible for half of the medical cost of the pregnancy and also responsible for half of all the costs of raising the child until it is 18. Maybe men should be required to have a vasectomy until he is ready to have children. All of the responsibility and legal actions are solely directed at women and men walk away with nothing happening to them and are able to just move forward with their lives. My understanding under the Constitution is that women should have the same rights as men, but they are being treated as second class citizens. You were elected to make the lives of your constituents better, not to impose moral beliefs on them. We will all have to answer to God for what we have done in our lives, it is not your elected responsibility to do so. Republicans continue to cut assistance for women and children. Are you going to increase funding for the additional children which will be born? Trying to push this bill through with little to no discussion is shameful and poor governing. I am asking you to vote no on this horrible bill which is basically a 6 week abortion ban. Even though there are exceptions, the restrictions are so limited that they may cause dangerous complications to women and leave doctors worried about their own liability and decision making. Please vote no on this bill to take away womens rights!Denise Miller212 Lakeview DrMason City, IASent from Outlook
07-10-2023
Kathy Geronzin [None]
CON
Pregnancy is very risky for the mother and the unborn. So many things have to come together for a healthy birth. Many pregnancies do not go well, fetuses die, placentas fail, etc. If women can not get the health care they need mothers and babies will die. I support the right to choose.
07-10-2023
Shari flatt [Indivisble ]
CON
Pro choice is not pro abortion. Pro choice means letting the individual make the decision that is best for them. Hearing a heart beat in the early weeks of a pregnancy is not true. There is no heart in the embryo stage. There is no fetus.
07-10-2023
Brittney [Hayes]
CON
This bill is incredibly irresponsible and will endanger so many Iowans. There are so many reasons that women and other people require this type of healthcare, and that is none of the governments business. Please stop legislating womens bodies. People are going to die if this bill gets passed
07-10-2023
Tom McGiverin [none]
CON
The bill is a violation of human rights of women and girls, and it reduces women and girls to the status of forced breeders, the same as livestock. Without the right to control their own reproduction, women will never be able to enjoy full and equal rights compared to men. You can bet that, as a famous feminist said, that if men could get pregnant, abortion would not only be a right, it would be a religious sacrament.So I am disgusted by the hypocrisy of the many male Republican legislators who support this bill, knowing full well they would never support it if they themselves could ever become pregnant and have to face the hard choices that women and young girls have to make after becoming involuntarily pregnant. Laws like this are the product of one particular brand of religion, conservative Christianity, and thus do not share the views and values of most Iowans, and the Republican majority in our legislature are well aware of this fact, but they don't care, because they, and their party, are supportive of a national agenda to impose a conservative Christian theocracy on the whole country, and we have already seen the evidence of this thru the recent rulings of the US Supreme Court. This cannot be allowed to happen to this country and fighting to prevent laws like this becoming passed and implemented is the beginning of the fight to protect our democracy and prevent a theocracy.
07-10-2023
Anonymous [none]
CON
I'm a physician and have many reasons to oppose this legislation. The main one is that I have practiced medicine in 3 different countries. In two of those countries, abortion was illegal. That, unfortunately did not make abortions less common but it did make it much more dangerous. Clandestine clinics were common, filled with dangerous practices, putting at risk the life of many women and often resulting in tragic deaths for some; many of them children themselves. Just like making drugs illegal has far from getting us away from drug problems in this country, if you really want to end abortion, making it illegal will only take us in the opposite direction. Another one is that medicine is a very complex matter. A "heart beat" bill will punished people in their most vulnerable times, when they are already making the hardest decisions to preserve their health and their life. I have seen terrible pregnancy complications happening at different states, in which carrying on the pregnancy would certainly endanger the life of the mother. Politicians should not practice medicine. Lastly, women deserve autonomy over their bodies. The day the government forces men to donate kidneys, livers, bone marrow, etc, to save someone else's life, then they would have moral grounds to ask a woman to put their own bodies at risk to carry out a pregnancy they are unwilling to for someone else's life. In the meantime, this legislation puts women as a lower class citizen compared to men.
07-10-2023
07-10-2023
Chelsea Clifford [00049506310]
CON
Iowa's governor and state legislature have praised Iowa's economic competitiveness and agricultural resiliency. They have touted the value of a futureready workforce and Iowa's attractiveness to workers from outofstate in support of technologically advanced business in Iowa.I am the type of person Iowa's government claims to want to attract. I came here four years ago to work as a postdoctoral research associate in Agricultural & Biosystems Engineering at Iowa State University, after completing my PhD in Environmental Science & Policy at Duke University in North Carolina. In other words, I have advanced technical skills very relevant to Iowa's economy and wellbeing. Prior to moving here, I had heard good things about Iowa over the years, enjoyed my one visit years before, and had hoped that Iowa could become my home, a place I would feel welcome to settle permanently. My supervisor has encouraged me to continue to pursue work in Iowa, and thinks I have a lot to offer the state.Instead, I'm preparing to leave Iowa. This proposed abortion restriction is the last straw in a series of government actions that have convinced me that Iowa's state government not only has no real interest in people like me and those I care about thriving, but even in protecting our basic rights, liberties, and safety. I already cannot in good conscience start a family in a state where trans kids cannot get the healthcare they need to survive and thrive, even if I as a parent were to decide, together with extensive medical assessment, as was the standard, that such care was what a child of mine needed. Nor would I want to send a child to school in a state where the government has prioritized tax cuts that disproportionately benefit people who already have plenty of money over school funding, and diverted my tax dollars to fund private schools as competitors to public schools rather than encouraging its public schools to succeed. I already felt like I had moved to a state transitioning to an imitation of Florida rather than the daring leader of US politics Iowa had once aimed to be. I already struggled to get the medical care I needed instate. The Iowa government's active battle against the battle against COVID19 at the height of the pandemic made it evident that the state government did not value my life as a disabled person. The state prioritized personal freedom to make medical decisions and economic growth in that case. I've gotten your message; I know when I'm not wanted. Now with this proposed abortion restriction, and the state's clear prioritization of it by hosting a special session for this purpose, Iowa proves a hostile place to even be pregnant, even for an otherwise healthy person, let alone to raise a family.I realize that this proposed antiabortion legislation contains some exceptions. However, similar legislation in other states has already proven to render medical professionals afraid to provide lifesaving care, such that lives and health have been threatened and damaged. We should not have to prove that our reproductive healthcare needs fall within politicians' definition of necessary, or to worry about if we'll be able to do so in an emergency. I want to live in a state that trusts women, and all adults and parents, to make their own decisions about medical care for their families, in consultation with medical professionals, faith leaders, and others they trust. My wonderful undergraduate students tend to agree; most of the talented young women I have mentored who have graduated have already left the state, with no intention to return. Iowa's supposed commitment to attracting, educating, and retaining skilled workers proves itself false when our government does not trust us those very skilled workers, including medical doctors to make basic decisions about medical care and family planning without state interference.Last summer, some friends from graduate school, a couple who had been married for more than a decade, came to visit me in Iowa. We had gone to graduate school in an acknowledged "foodie city," so they were pleasantly surprised to find comparably good offerings here; Iowa exceeded their expectations culturally. When they visited, the woman in the couple was pregnant. It was her second pregnancy, both wanted and planned. Six months earlier, they had had to leave their home state, which had a much less restrictive abortion ban than the one Iowa is currently considering, for an abortion, necessitated by lateterm fetal abnormalities. They had been devastated, and were still grieving even as they bravely tried again. The lack of support of their home state in an already incredibly painful situation, that they had to go somewhere unfamiliar for the procedure and could not recuperate at home, had been salt in an already deep wound. This story has a happy ending; their baby daughter from their second pregnancy is doing great; this story has a happy ending. However, if that couple were in the same situation this summer, they would not visit me in Iowa. The risk of not being able to get necessary care immediately if they had enough pregnancy emergency would not be worth experiencing Iowa. Already, my best friend from undergrad, a queer woman originally from Minnesota, meets me in Minnesota when she visits her parents, but will not visit me in Iowa. She does not feel safe or welcome here. I feel like I have to leave Iowa just to be with the people I care about. People with a deeper history in Iowa, whose ties are mostly here, should not have to choose between being here with the people they care about, and leaving for the wellbeing of themselves and their families. Unnecessarily creating these dilemmas benefits no one.Please do the right thing, and do not pass this legislation. Trust Iowans.
07-11-2023
Dan Johnson []
CON
Im a lifelong Iowa resident, former Catholic and even the Grand Knight of my college council of The Knights of Columbus, so Ive walked in ProLife rallies.. But I also have two bright daughters and my first granddaughter is due next month. This abortion ban is an extreme measure thatll inflict major damage against not just the women of Iowa, but the state as a whole. Weve got to vote this down or well all regret it.
07-11-2023
Lisa Martincik [Private citizen]
PRO
Pregnant folk, not some Governor who ignores both science and the will of the majority, deserve dominion over their own bodies.
07-11-2023
07-11-2023
Erica [Fjelland ]
PRO
A woman needs freedom of choice!! Its my body!! I have a daughter and granddaughters. They need freedom of choice!! I dont want anyone but ME to say what happens to it. You are not GOD!!
07-11-2023
Joseph Henry []
CON
I believe in reproductive freedom, as the mostdemocratic path. So, I fully believe that the private health care decision belongs morally andtotally between an individual, their family, andtheir doctor. Thus, I completely support women's reproductive freedom, as the most civil and humanedecision, going forward.
07-11-2023
Alyssa Kichula [N/a]
CON
I have a one year old that I love dearly, and my husband and I would like to give him a little brother or sister in a few years. A bill like this, however, makes me scared to become pregnant again. We have seen the negative impacts similar bills have had in other states where, when things go wrong in a pregnancy (as they unfortunately do with some frequency) doctors are afraid to act to save the womans life until the situation becomes truly dire (like the woman has gone septic, as opposed to just being in danger of getting sepsis). I want to stay alive for the son I already have, and I fear that my life will not be prioritized if something goes wrong during any future pregnancies while this bill is law. I believe that the State has ZERO place in this decisionit should be between a woman and her doctor to decide the pros and cons and risks and, ultimately, what decision they move forward with. A doctor should not have to weigh these concerns against trying to guess how the state will interpret these same risks. The majority of Iowans do not agree with the types of restrictions imposed by this bill. (As an aside, the determination that rape is only an exception if reported within 45 days to an official law enforcement body is absolutely cruel; a woman who chose not to report might not even know she is pregnant within that time frame. If you do no other improvement to this bill AT LEAST extend the timeline for rape exceptions to the same timeframe you give incest.)
07-11-2023
Kristi Poole [NA]
PRO
I have lived in Iowa my entire life. I was proud when Iowa was the first state to legalize gay marriage but now I see people in power forcing their will on us instead of representing everyone, not just a select few. If you represented everyone you would know Iowans want to keep abortion legal. States that limit abortion after so many weeks have found it hard to give women safe options when there were pregnancy complications. Even representatives who voted for these measures have come to regret their decisions realizing too late "our actions have consequences".
07-11-2023
Elena Andrews []
CON
Please, please do not pass this bill. As someone with a uterus, it terrifies me to know that my state legislators are trying to take away my right to control my own body. It terrifies me to even think about becoming pregnant if this law passes, because I know that taking away abortion rights makes pregnancy (something that is already extremely taxing emotionally, mentally, and physically) potentially deadly. Abortion is not just a right, it's often a necessary medical procedure that can save the life of a pregnant person. Furthermore, a majority of Iowans believe abortion should be allowed in most cases. How can you call yourselves a representative body of government if you go against the wishes of the majority of people you represent? I urge you: listen to the people of Iowa. Protect our right to abortion. It will save lives.
07-11-2023
McKenzie Sundall Gaspar [Medical student ]
CON
I am a 3rd year medical student in Des Moines, interested in pursuing a career as an OB/GYN in a rural community. Iowa has the fewest OB/GYNs per capita in the entire country. 66 of Iowa's 99 counties lack access to OB/GYN and birth services. Iowa is in desperate need of future physicians like me and my classmates to stay in the state to practice. If this legislation passes, you are telling us this is a state that will stand between us and our patients. We go through a minimum of 11 plus years of education after high school, we spend 100s of thousands of dollars on our educations, we sacrifice of our 20's, trudging through grueling days and nights of studying, and countless exams. Then you tell us, in Iowa, the state is going to stand between you and your patients in your exam rooms and ORs. The nonsterile hand of the government, blocking mine from being able to reach my patient's. This future is an unsavory one for myself and many of my classmates. You will stop many phenomenal physicians from calling Iowa home in the future with this bill if it is passed. With this being said, please leave private health care decisions between the pregnant individual and their physician. Keep government small and avoid this overreach.
07-11-2023
Ashley [Citizen]
CON
Legislators, I urge you to please vote "no" on this bill. As a chronically ill woman, whose medical condition would make it very difficult to maintain a healthy pregnancy but that likely wouldn't be considered a "medical emergency" in your definition I am frightened and frustrated that this is the direction that you are trying to take to regress our state. I and any other woman should have access to abortion a scientific, proven, centuries old medical procedure. Women shouldn't have to experience a medical emergency or have been violated to access safe abortion procedures. I am glad that you are including these exceptions, but abortion should remain accessible for all, no matter what the reason is. It is a choice to be made between the pregnant woman, her family and her doctor. Women have always obtained abortions limiting them will just ensure that women pursue unsafe and deadly abortion procedures. Iowa's motto is, "Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain." I implore you to please stand for this don't take us backwards. Don't be hypocritical and stand against freedom and safety. If you want to be prolife, fine, but please do so in a more constructive and helpful way expand access to contraceptives, mandate accurate and comprehensive sexual education, strengthen supports for struggling families, etc. There are other ways to fight for life that won't harm several people and effectively make women secondclass citizens. Please represent the will of the people most of whom when polled consistently oppose restrictions on abortions. Please see the attached image but from a poll conducted by the Des Moines Register & Mediacom Iowa in 2022 "Most Iowans, 61%, say abortion should be legal in most or all cases, while 33% say all or most cases should be illegal. Six percent are unsure." Clearly of these numbers, the majority of those polled support abortion access. Additionally, from the article "At least half of every demographic group supports it as well.... A huge majority of women favor legal abortion (72%), as do people under age 35 (69%)." If you want to represent your constituents and fight for the will of the people, put this issue on the ballot please stop talking to groups who don't represent a large portion of how Iowans feel on this issue. Additionally, our country and state were founded on the ideal of separation of Church and State. Most arguments against abortion are created for religious reasons, but all of us deserve to live our lives free from worry of religion interfering in politics and policies, and thus our lives. Some people have different religious beliefs than you, and some have none at all. Please stand for separation of Church and State, freedom for women, trusting women, trusting medical professionals, and healthcare. For these reasons, and others, I implore you to PLEASE vote "No" on this bill. Please listen to the majority on this issue who disagree with what you are trying to do. Thank you for your time and consideration. Ashley
Attachment
07-11-2023
Sue Kasperbauer [None ]
CON
I am against the government ignoring science and proclaiming that they should control a womans reproductive healthcare as it is not impacting others safety, freedom or pursuit of happiness.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [NARAL Pro Choice America]
CON
I urge you to vote no on any ban on abortion. It has been legal since I was a teen. I was fortunate enough to not have to decide if I would end a pregnancy. I had both of my children, but it was my choice. No woman should have the right to make her own healthcare decisions taken away from her. Vote No on any legislation that will change the current law in Iowa. Abortions are allowed and legal until twenty weeks. Iowa should not go backwards on women's rights.
07-11-2023
Lisa Hannon []
CON
Hard no to a fetal heartbeat bill. Abortion is a medical issue in which politicians should not be involved. States which take drastic antiabortion measures can expect to lose nurses, doctors, medical students and young people in general. This is not the direction we want to go in Iowa. Sincerely,
07-11-2023
Callie Reynolds [Bear Den Builders ]
CON
Women are not livestock to be controlled and bred without choice. If you trust Iowans to choose to mask or not mask, why is womens healthcare any different? hypocrisy at its finest. Majority of Iowans are for women having a choice, and just because an abortion is available doesnt mean that those who dont want one have to get one.This entire special session is a waste of taxpayer dollars that could be used for many other things that would actually benefit Iowans.
07-11-2023
Jeffrey Gordon [self]
CON
Every person deserves their right to bodily autonomy. Forcedbirths are atrocious and should be criminal. At six weeks, we cant accurately measure the cutoff, a woman cant confidently know they even are pregnant or just late, and the decision on whether or not to give birth prior to viability should be between them and their doctor, not some arbitrarily placed line in time by uninvolved politicians who dont care about children once theyre born. This bill is just plain revolting and a sick abuse of womens rights.
07-11-2023
Peter Leavitt []
CON
I am strongly against this bill. It undermines the very concepts of privacy and bodily autonomy.
07-11-2023
Ruth Turner [United Methodist]
CON
I have had this procedure twice to save my life, my life and the lives of my additional children. If you make healthcare unavailable women who are alive will suffer. The University of Iowa provided me with this service. I had to drive hours to get there, I live in state. Now imagine instead you pass this rule, now I am driving out of state while literally bleeding to death. You may save a fetus but as a Christan do you execpt being responsible for a mother's death?
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
As an Iowa resident, I am strongly against the Iowa Legislature legislating the personal medical decisions of women and families. This legislation is an overreach by our state government, and we must treat it as such.
07-11-2023
Rev. Diana Smith [Unitarian Universalist Society]
CON
I want to share with you three difficult stories about abortion from the past year: A friend in Texas, which had recently passed a ban similar to the one you're entertaining today, was early in her pregnancy when she caught COVID. This resulted in extreme complications, and her doctors and my friend concluded she needed an abortion. They were prevented from providing one by the wording of the law. This resulted in a medical crisis that almost cost her life, as well as resulting in a much more traumatic miscarriage a couple months farther into her pregnancy. A friend in a similar situation in Arizona, where abortion remains legal, was able to receive the abortion she needed. While it was difficult for her and her family, she is experiencing fewer longterm damaging physical and mental health complications. A friend here in Iowa, who is in her late 40s, found she was pregnant at 7 weeks. The pregnancy was unplanned and resulted from the irregular ways that bodies sometimes respond to contraceptives during perimenopause, which also meant she was not aware of her pregnancy sooner. Due to her age, health, family situation, and the likelihood of complication, having another child was not a good option. Because of the current limits to abortion in Iowa her abortion has more complicated but still legal. Under the proposed laws it would not be. Someone in her situation would be forced to unnecessarily go through a much more complicated process to receive the care she needed or would be forced to carry a fetus that would endanger her and her family's health.These are stories of three people in my personal life who needed the ability to exercise the right to safe, legal abortion. As a minister, I encounter stories like these regularly from people within and outside of my congregation. Every day people are making decisions about how to ethically and responsibly proceed with or terminate pregnancies. For the health of individuals, families, and our society, it is imperative that abortion remain legal to 22 weeks in Iowa. I am unequivocally opposed to the proposed bills.My faith unabashedly declares that every body is sacred. We also declare that bodily autonomy that is, the right to make choices about what happens to our own bodies, as well as the resources and support to follow through on those choices is a basic human right and supporting access to that right is a part of our faith. We also are very clear that the right to safe, legal abortions is part of a robust approach to reproductive justice. Reproductive justice is the human right to maintain personal bodily autonomy, have children, not have children, and parent the children we have in safe and sustainable communities. These rights and choices have not been available to many people in this country, and restricting abortion is moving in the wrong direction.As Rev. Ashley Horan, who leads Side with Love, our Unitarian Universalist justice campaign, says, The Reproductive Justice movement teaches us that stigmatization of abortion alongside all the societal factors that make every choice in an unwanted pregnancy a difficult one, from a broken healthcare system to religious intolerance to lack of support for parents to poverty to mass incarceration are actually what is traumatizing to people who do not want to be pregnant The majority of people who experience sorrow, grief, despair, and isolation after an abortion are mourning not abortion itself, but the circumstances in which the abortion became the right or only decision for them. Violence, abuse, trauma, poverty, instability, racism, ableism these are the real causes of despair.My faith tells me that abortion is a blessing because it is one way of honoring the sacredness of our bodies. It can help us create lives of freedom and thriving. It can help us honor and live into our twin gifts of agency and conscience. Anytime disparities in resources and freedoms or legal rights make it more difficult for some groups to exercise autonomy over their bodies, my faith calls us to take action and speak up. And so I implore you to reject these bills and retain broader access to abortion in Iowa.Sincerely,Rev. Diana Smith
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This bill does not represent the will of the people or freedom in any way. Stop taking away our constitutional rights.
07-11-2023
Mary Hoffman []
CON
Women's Bodies, Women's Choices. Legislators make really poor doctors not seemly aware of the unintended(?) consequences of their attempts to restrict reproductive options.Want to be pro life? Focus on ending hunger andmaking education more equatable in Iowa. Tell GovReynolds to apply for Federal money for free schoollunches. Make sure Iowans have accessible and affordable health care for all their lives. Our seniors should not have to choose between takingtheir medicines and eating!BTW I vote on choice. The majority of Iowans support choice. See Kansas!
07-11-2023
Sarah Costello []
CON
I am a forth year medical student applying to primary care residency programs this year. I am strongly opposed to this bill because it will place nonevidence based restrictions on medical care that is safe and essential to reproductive health. Medical decisions should be made between a patient and medical professional, not decided by legislators. I am very concerned that if this bill passes I will not be able to continue my training in Iowa and will be forced to train and practice in another state. For these reasons I am strongly opposed to this bill and urge legislators to vote no for HSB 255. Thank you for your consideration
07-11-2023
Shirley Vermace []
CON
Prochoice is the only moral answer. Womenss rights are Human rights. Until women have full rights over their own bodies and their own choices in reproduction, will there be full justice for all. Your Christian values are absolutely okay for you, but you cannot legislate your religious belief systems onto others! Iowa people support PROCHOICE, same as Kansas, you saw it play out there. Stop attacking womens and girls basic human rights. This bill is Draconian and horrific and will traumatize hundreds of Iowa women and girls. You will not stop abortions, but you will see more deaths of women if you continue this bill to ban abortions. Just look at the stats from around the country. For instance, Colorado. They have birth control widely available and affordable, proper realistic sex education, and legal abortion and guess what?! The abortion rates plummeted in the State of Colorado! I may not be able to be there in time for the hearing, please add this comment as a CON, against this bill to ban abortions in Iowa. Thank you for your time.Shirley VermaceDecorah
07-11-2023
Anonymous [Individual]
CON
This is a near total abortion ban. This will kill women. It will force unwanted children into a world where this legislature has already cut funding for the schools, a state with no Medicaid expansion, and a state with rising school lunch debt. It forces pregnancy and birth in a state with limited postpartum Medicaid coverage.It will force taxpayers to pay more money defending this bill in court.This is also an issue of religious freedom. Not all of us are evangelical Christians, and we should not be governed as if we are.Iowans do not want this bill. 61% of Iowans polled believed abortion should be legal in most or all cases. https://infogram.com/1p5l03xkqg963zhpr9z1ynrwkdt3pmp57xk
07-11-2023
Emily Westergaard [Self]
CON
ABORTION IS HEALTHCARE
07-11-2023
Emily Haworth []
CON
I am frustrated, though not shocked, that this needs to be said, but Iowas Legislature and its government work for Iowans, the majority of whom support a persons right to make decisions about their own reproductive system. How does it then follow that our state government thinks theyre serving our interests by imposing draconian laws that jeopardize medical freedom, privacy, and the health and safety of women?I could enumerate the many reasons why banning abortion is absurd. Im sure others will today; I hope they do. But this wont be new information to anyone in a position to vote on this bill. Instead, I would like to say: even if HSB 255 wasnt an egregious attempt to push a particular religions views on the public (it is), it is certainly a violation of the peoples trust in their elected officials. Your constituents will ask you about this, and you will have to answer them. Will you tell them that you know better than they do how they should live? Will you tell them that you think they are too stupid to be trusted to make their own medical decisions? Will you tell them that, once elected, you decided to abandon their interests, in favor of a party line?
07-11-2023
Matthew Bailey []
CON
This bill is a reprehensible rejection of the will of the majority of Iowans.
07-11-2023
Elizabeth Baird []
CON
The values of individual freedom and choice should guide whether one gives birth to a child, not the choices made by politicians. I oppose any attempt by Iowa legislators to take away the ability of Iowans to make our own, very personal, reproductive choices.
07-11-2023
James Gruening []
CON
You are removing a basic human right for women removing their bodily autonomy. The majority of Iowans are against this, and you are ruling instead of governing. This will cost the lives of women in our state, will drive younger women to leave our state. It will cause people to not come to our state and will make our doctor shortage even more severe. When you remove human rights, it costs lives and will cost us citizens. This will have negative effects to our economy as well. Vote against this and keep the government out of our citizens medical decisions. Support human rights.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
The government does not belong in my health care decisions
07-11-2023
Sean Flaherty [Self]
CON
Dear Representatives,House Study Bill 255 will cause tragedy in the individual lives of people it would deny safe and readily accessible abortion services, and injure the cause of human rights in the United States. I believe that the right to choose abortion before a fetus is viable outside the womb is fundamental to the human right of bodily autonomy. Pregnancy brings serious health consequences and mortal risk, even under ideal conditions. To require a woman or pregnant person to continue a pregnancy to birth is similar to requiring a person to donate one of their kidneys if their genetics match those of person needing a transplant. You have heard these points before. And those who believe the law should prohibit abortion believe in the best conscience that our human rights culture requires it. At most, very, very few minds will change today.So I'll end with a question for Members who intend to vote for HSB 255: Would you really do it if neighboring states did not allow abortion care past six weeks? Many of you would, based on deep belief. I ask all of you to be absolutely certain that you would before you cast your vote today. Respectfully,Sean Flaherty
07-11-2023
Barcey Thurston Levy [Citizen of Iowa]
CON
As a family physician who graduated from the UI Carver College of Medicine, and who has been in practice for over 30 years, I am speaking from my experience of caring for pregnant women. This bill is ridiculous. It will not save the lives of women in danger from pregnancies gone awry. Terminating a pregnancy is a very difficult choice that should involve shared decision making between a patient, her partner (if involved), and her physician. Legislators have no role in this decision. Calling this a "right to life" bill and "protecting an unborn child" is a misnomer. It is a forced birth bill, that will result in delayed, necessary care for women who experience any one of a number of common lifethreatening medical issues while pregnant premature rupture of membranes, very preterm labor, placental bleeding, preeclampsia, serious fetal chromosomal and other defects that are likely to result in fetal death before delivery or shortly thereafter. If not that, then lifelong care that requires a team and very expensive therapies that many women do not have access to. We need to have a state where reproductive healthcare is fully available and not in the hands of a legislature that has no concept of the lifethreatening medical issues for the mother that can occur during a failed pregnancy. In addition, reproductive care should be a private issue between a woman, her partner, and her physician, not something mandated by the legislature. It is very disturbing that Governor Reynolds and many Republicans would be ramming this through. Put our tax dollars into improving Iowa public schools and raising educational standards throughout the state! Make Iowa a safe state for transgender individuals. Do not involve yourself in reproductive healthcare! As a citizen of this once great state, I am strongly opposed to this bill.
07-11-2023
Melissa Jennie Ann Steffen [none]
CON
Pregnancy is a medical condition with many potential complications. Restricting access to life saving medical care just because a woman is pregnant is absurd and cruel.
07-11-2023
Samantha Solimeo []
CON
I am opposed to this effort to restrict peoples access to safe medical procedures to terminate implantation. Abortion is a human right that should be available to Iowans. This legislation does not reflect my values as an Iowan
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This special session is a waste of taxpayer money and an attack on Iowans longheld right to make their own healthcare decisions. The fact that the governor has called a special session to pass legislature the majority of Iowans oppose shows how out of touch the current Republican party is in Iowa.
07-11-2023
Tim Wagner [N/A]
CON
As citizen of Iowa, a husband, and a father of a 27 yr old daughter, I am deeply opposed to this bill. This will NOT STOP abortion. It will only makelife more dangerous for all women and their right to healthcare. The oftused definition of "prolife" is a fallacy. 1) The GOP is using the label for election purposes only, to galvanize the cultural divide in America, that your party is directly responsible for, again all for election purposes. 2) If the party was truly prolife, they would advocate for policies that include medicaid postpartem coverage for all Iowans, you would be working to advance easy and affordable healthcare for ALL families, strengthening small town economies, and truly fund the great equalizer, public education in the state. Preventing the legitimate need for abortion is NOT PROLIFE.FACT: MORE THAN 61% OF ALL IOWANS SUPPORT ABORTION RIGHTS.WE HAVE NEVER USED TAXPAYER DOLLARS TO TAKE AWAY OUR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS.Iowans will never forget the politicians who voted to take our reproductive freedom. Period!
07-11-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
Restricting access to abortion is a war against women. With a fetal heartbeat restriction, many women will not even know they are pregnant before it takes place.
07-11-2023
Grace Chabal []
CON
I oppose this bill. As a physician and current OBGYN resident, this bill is dangerous to the lives of Iowan women. Whether abortion is legal or not, women in desperate situations will find ways to get an abortion this law will only get rid of safe abortions. Women will find ways to get abortions by traveling across state lines. This ban will only impact the poorest women who already have limited access to healthcare and resources for their families. Finally, as a physician, I chose to train in Iowa because I wanted to learn termination procedures and with already limited OBGYN providers in this state I worry this ban will make it harder to recruit physicians to work in this state and may cause some current providers to go elsewhere.
07-11-2023
Marcia Jensen []
CON
This special session to take away the rights of the people of Iowa upsets me greatly. The bill you are considering does not represent the wishes of a majority of Iowans. It begs the question of who our Iowa oneparty system is working for. The effects of the passage of this bill go beyond abortion. It will intimidate doctors who may need to perform life saving treatments for women well past the time it is safe to do so. Please vote "no" on this bill.
07-11-2023
Kelsey Cooney []
CON
I strongly oppose this bill and taking away the rights of thousands or Iowa women. Not to mention this bill will also kill several women but lets make sure there is a baby that nobody will take care of.
07-11-2023
David Curry []
CON
Women should have the right, without interference by the State, to decide whether to bear a child or not. The mother and father know best if they have the resources to give birth to and raise a child in a loving and supportive environment. Do not pass any laws which would further infringe on this right.
07-11-2023
Maren Bettermann [Self ]
CON
I am a resident physician at the university of Iowa training in OBGYN. I would like to speak on behalf of all of the residents coming to the university to have a broad spectrum of training including abortion training.
07-11-2023
Barbara Kuttler []
CON
My husband and I have been married 41 years, have raised 4 children, and believe that the decision whether to have children and when to have them should be theirs, and theirs alone. And abortion, a medical procedure, should be a legal option. Government should not not be imposing a religious view on everyone. Every woman should be able to make decisions about their own reproduction and health. We are opposed to this propsed bill.
07-11-2023
Steven Petty [self]
CON
Would the supposed party of small government please stay outof transactions involving me, the professionals I choose for assistance and my God?
07-11-2023
Maria Story MD FACP CHS [Southeast Iowa Regional Medical Center]
CON
I am an Internal Medicine physician and oppose this bill. Iowa must remain a state that allows women to have bodily autonomy in all healthcare decisions, including the decision to have an abortion. I am very concerned that there will be higher maternal morbidity and mortality if this law is passed, as women may delay pregnancy care for fear of legal implications and result in serious medical complications or lasting bodily harm. Do not pass this bill.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Vote No on any heartbeat bill. "Vote to make sure abortion care stays accessible to those who need it" "I, along with the majority of Iowans, support keeping abortion, safe, legal, and accessible because its the right thing to do for women. When you remove the healthcare decisions from females you condemn us to second class citizens. The male politicians deciding whats best for strangers theyve never met & will never agree are equal to them, arent even medical doctors. How dare you allow this condemnation to poverty for the female & any children she already has at home. Iowa republicans have no desire to expand healthcare to include women or any of the needs, education, work place w/day care, or food supplements for those who need assistance. Instead you continue to make access more difficult. You have made it so that rapists can choose their baby momma with little or no consequence to the man doing the violent act of impregnating, that should include husband rape but it wont in this patriarchal run gop. Instead you would force the girl to carry to term the spawn of evil & then allow him custody. Shameful. At six weeks there is no heartbeat, only the electrical hum of fetal cells & blood tissue. No fetus can survive on its own. Do you ever consider the children already born & those who may be born in the future when abortion is chose? You destroy or kill those kids by denying a woman choice on what to do with her body & family planning. Unless you are going to support women 100% you have no right to destroy their entire lives with an unwanted pregnancy. If only men would take the responsibility that without the penis there is no unwanted pregnancy, no unwanted child, no lifelong mental issues being forced to use your body as a receptacle for the penis & sperm. How many laws are there on the books dictating how men can use their penis or that make masturbation an act to be policed for potential life in that sperm needed to fertilize an egg?Or how about the courts enforcing court ordered child support on the men that used their penis to impregnate, at no cost to the mothers to collect. If women arent equal in their rights, Iowa will continue to have a mass exodus of females & their potential families. Vote no on the heartbeat bill or any bill banning abortion, any bill that restricts womens right to making their healthcare decisions, vote no.Quit making females second class citizens.
07-11-2023
Kenda Steffensmeier [N/A]
CON
Medical decisions should be left to the provider and the patient. The right to bodily autonomy is a human right. The state should not have the ability to deny health care to its citizens.
07-11-2023
Robert Michaels [None]
CON
I support full reproductive freedom until the point of viability.
07-11-2023
Tish Williams [None]
CON
Do not take away a womans right to choose. It should not be government choice but only between her and her doctors.
07-11-2023
Kristy Hartsgrove Mooers [Self]
CON
This law does not represent the will of the voters. It is an attack of our civil rights and the bodily autonomy of every Iowan. Please listen to the 61 percent of Iowa voters who have consistently polled against abortion bans, and not the Hoover Institutes and the Koch Brothers and the ALECs and all the other wealthy organizations that want to see American citizens freedom curtailed in every possible way. Stand for us, not for them.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am a primary care physician with almost 20 years of experience. I care for patients from birth to death. Early on in my career I did OB. I delivered over 300 babies during that time. I have cared for uninsured and underinsured pregnant women. I have volunteered in outreach education regarding reproductive health. My first practice was at a federally funded community health center where I oversaw and managed all the highrisk OB.I oppose SSB 1223/HSB 225 bills. Reproductive care is healthcare, and this includes abortion. This law interferes with the intimate and often complex decisions regarding reproductive care between a woman and her physician. The decisions regarding pregnancy and all reproductive health care should be between the woman and her doctor. I have seen the joys, heart breaks and everything in between when it comes to reproductive care. These decisions are difficult already without state government infringing, impeding or blocking access to standard medical care. I join the voices of the majority of citizens in opposing this legislation. I urge all Iowa lawmakers to vote no on these bills. Let the physicians across this state do what we have been called to do, which is care for people with compassion. And keep the decisions regarding reproductive health care where it belongs in the hands of women.
07-11-2023
Sarah Price [NA]
CON
I support Iowas right to access to abortion and believe that abortion is healthcare. We have seen that in other states when you take away access to women, women die and their ability to have children again is taken away. More women, children, and families will suffer if this passes. The decisions regarding abortion are a medical issue that should be between the physicians and their patient. They should be able to come to the best possible decision for all concerned based on the best medical information.
07-11-2023
Diane Dean []
CON
Tragically some parents who dearly want their baby have to decide to save the mom's life because of an incomplete miscarriage. Mom is bleeding to death yet a quiver of cardiac tissue can be detected. Cardiac tissue is not a fully developed functioning heart.
07-11-2023
Sandy Lewis [Unity point health]
CON
If this passes and we lose the right to control our bodies with the assistance of our health care providers, not only will women suffer but health care providers will leave Iowa. We will become a state with so few obstetricians that no woman will be safe in her pregnancy. It is already difficult to attract OBs to Iowa and it will be even more so if they feel that the6 can not offer good care to patients or may be prosecuted for doing so.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
This is not what Iowans want, this will prevent people from receiving necessary healthcare, will kill citizens, and will cause an escalation or increase of domestic abuse against pregnant persons.
07-11-2023
Heather M []
CON
Vote no on this.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
I believe all Iowans have the right to make our own decisions about our bodies, lives and futures free from government control. Iowa families not politicians should be able to decide what medical decisions are best for them. I ask you to take a stand for the rights of your constituents like me and vote NO on any abortion restrictions in the upcoming special session.
07-11-2023
Emily M Johnson [NA]
CON
I oppose this bill and I urge Governor Reynolds and the members of Congress to reevaluate their position. The majority of Iowans do not want this level of abortion restrictions in Iowa and by passing this, you are ignoring what we, the people, want and have elected you to do. I believe women should have the choice of whether or not to bring a fetus to term, based on their own circumstances, needs and beliefs. We do not force men to have vasectomies, which in your religious terms kills millions of potential babies, so why do we not give women the same right to choose what is right for them and their health? So often we hear that the future babys life is more important that the woman who is alive and dealing with this very difficult decision right now. I believe if you really cared about women, children and families, you would be showing that by expanding Medicaid in our state, expanding mental health resources and food access, and not passing laws that prohibit people from being themselves and making choices for themselves. If you want to save children, work to reduce poverty, help people get the resources they need and stop passing bills that take AWAY human rights.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
Restricting access to abortion is essentially banning it. A huge step backwards for women's rights. It will devastate not only women seeking abortion, but women who miscarry and have ectopic pregnancies. Please for the sake of all of us do not pass this bill
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Women deserve the same body autonomy as men. We do not force humans to donate their kidneys or other organs even though this would save lives and not doing so means death for some. This is because we value body autonomy. If you have 2 healthy kidneys then you have no business voting for this bill.Medical choices belong between each person and thier doctor. If you really care about the health and wellness of Iowans then start prioritizing public education, preschools, water quality, mental health, food security, and other programs that actually improve the lives of Iowans.
07-11-2023
Cynthia A Wong []
CON
I strongly oppose this legislation. It interferes with the physicianpatient relationship and to joint decisionmaking based on the best available medical evidence. It is "antilife," not prolife. Studies in other states and other countries show that the maternal mortality is inversely related to abortion retriction: more restrictive abortion laws are associated with an increased risk of maternal death. This is not prolife.
07-11-2023
Carmin Bullock []
CON
What happens inside MY uterus should be MY decision!
07-11-2023
Mindy Kruckenberg []
CON
Abortion is health care.
07-11-2023
Brandy Mitchell, Nurse Practitioner []
CON
I am in the majority opinion of Iowans supporting access to safe and legal abortion. Restricting abortion in Iowa fails to consider the complex realities faced by women and will negatively impact society as a whole. The proposed legislation is a violation of reproductive rights: Banning abortions restricts a woman's ability to make choices about her own body and reproductive health. It interferes with her right to access safe and legal medical procedures. Such a ban disregards the principle of bodily autonomy and personal freedom. The proposed legislation is a risk to women's health: Restricting access to safe and legal abortions doesn't eliminate the need for abortions. Instead, it drives women towards unsafe alternatives, putting their lives and health at risk. Without access to medical professionals and regulated facilities, women may resort to unsafe practices that can lead to complications and even death. The proposed legislation disproportionately impacts vulnerable populations: Banning abortions disproportionately affects marginalized communities and lowincome individuals who may struggle to travel long distances or afford the associated costs. This creates an unjust situation where those with more resources can access abortions while others are denied that right. The proposed legislation will negatively impact families and children: Unplanned or unwanted pregnancies can have significant social, emotional, and economic consequences for families and children. By denying access to abortions, the ban may contribute to an increase in the number of children born into circumstances where they may face inadequate support or care. The proposed legislation negatively impacts public health in Iowa: Comprehensive reproductive healthcare includes access to contraception, family planning, and safe abortions. By banning abortions, the state limits individuals' access to necessary healthcare services, which can have negative consequences on public health, including increased rates of maternal mortality and the spread of unsafe practices.For all these reasons, I urge you to continue to allow women in Iowa to make decisions about their reproductive healthcare privately with their health care team. Brandy Mitchell, Nurse Practitioner
07-11-2023
Carlos Rodriguez Rosa []
CON
Medical decisions should be between the woman and her doctor. The government should not have a say on what women do with their bodies, especially if THEY are the ones living with the consequences of your decisions. These are rights everyone should havemedical freedom.
07-11-2023
Maia Sheppard [Mother, wife, sister, daughter]
CON
This bill takes away women's fundamental right to bodily autonomy. This bill makes women second class citizens in Iowa. No matter what men think, abortion is a fact of life. Women have always had them; they always have and they always will. Are they going to have good ones or bad ones? Shirley Chisholm, Unbought And Unbossed
07-11-2023
Rebecca Flint []
CON
The government should not be involved in personal health care decisions, full stop. And abortion is far too complicated to legislate, even if you are okay with forcing people to give birth. We've already seen the devastating effects of similar abortion bans in other states where women are not legally allowed to be treated for life threatening medical conditions until they are "close enough" to death because their fetus still has cardiac activity. Maternal health care will suffer greatly because of this law, for all women, with wanted or unwanted pregnancies.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
Not in support of at all.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
The Republican Party has always been about small government. This bill is not small government. This bill is intruding on a womans personal health. Please vote no on this bill and keep government out of a womens health decisions with their doctors.
07-11-2023
Kim Martin []
CON
Abortion restrictions do not stop abortions, they just make them unsafe. When people cannot get safe and legal abortions, they will seek other means of terminating their pregnancy that can endanger their health. Legislators are putting countless lives at risk by implementing these abhorrent restrictions, and they are making it more difficult for people to access essential health care services.Legislators in Iowa must act now to promote legislation that would protect abortion rights, and to protect the decisions of all their constituents who can get pregnant. Abortion is a safe and common medical procedure, and it is a human right. Americans themselves should determine what they do with their bodies not lawmakers.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This bill is going to harm women and doctors. Case in point, I was born with a rare genetic disorder and given a less than one percent chance of survival. Doctors were able to give her a choice. My mother had nightmares during her pregnancy with me. This was one of the hardest moments of her live when she got the news of the condition. Pregnancy and life are hard enough, women deserve to have a choice over what happens in their body.
07-11-2023
Emily Westergaard [Self]
CON
ABORTION IS HEALTHCARE
07-11-2023
Steve Peterson []
CON
An abortion ban as proposed imposes second class citizenship on pregnant people and takes away their freedom to make healthcare decisions about their own bodies. Vote no.
07-11-2023
Waverly [Zhao]
CON
I would like to talk from the perspective of the youth!
07-11-2023
Joyce Godwin []
CON
I don't believe anyone has the right to tell another person what decisions are best for them.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [NA]
CON
I strongly oppose HSB 255. Most women don't know if they are pregnant at 6 weeks. This bill is disrespectful to the women of Iowa. We have the right to make our own decisions about our body. AlI I do not want to live in an Iowa that treats me has if I am a Handmaiden from Handmaids Tale. Please vote no on bill HSB 255.
07-11-2023
Laura Hurt []
CON
This proposed ban is ridiculous and is a big middle finger to anybody wanting to make their own choices over their own body, their lives and their future. My daughter should not be growing up with LESS rights than I had at her age. Vote NO to this!
07-11-2023
Linda Schreiber [Voter]
CON
Today, lawmakers will decide the fate of womens reproductive rights in Iowa. Gov. Kim Reynolds is counting on her legislators to vote her way and deny women the right to abortion, although the majority of men and women express strong support for legal abortion. Women are more likely than men to hold this view 63% vs. 58%. Among adults under age 30, 74% say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, as do 62% of adults in their 30s and 40s. Of those in their 50s and early 60s, 55% express support for legal abortion, as do 54% of those ages 65 and older (PEW Research). Women represent 56.8% of the U.S. labor force in 2022 (Bureau of Labor Statistics). While abortion has declined in Iowa and the U.S., forcing pregnancy will negatively impact the economy. Childcare deserts exist in Iowa, if and when parents can find childcare it is at a premium cost. This spring, the governor and leaders in the Iowa Department of Health and Human Services refused a $30 million federal grant to support childcare services (Iowa Capital Dispatch). Criminalizing abortion will not stop abortions. It will make abortion less safe. Criminalizing abortion is a form of discrimination, which fuels a stigma. Deaths and injuries from unsafe abortions are preventable but these deaths are common where access to safe abortion is limited or prohibited. Iowa lawmakers cannot defend or justify a vote to deny women their reproductive rights. Only a woman can decide when the time is right to begin a family. A vote to ban reproductive rights is a vote against women and equal rights.
07-11-2023
Allie Koolbeck [N/A citizen ]
CON
Taking away a fundamental right from women to have the choice over their body is cruel and inhumane. The majority of Iowans do not want a near total ban on abortion legislators would completely ignore the will of the people by passing this law. It would risk the health, safety, and well being of Iowa women and deny them basic human rights. This bill should absolutely not be passed.
07-11-2023
Derek Hurt []
CON
Vote NO to this! Let women make their own choices and stop legislating what a woman does with her own body.
07-11-2023
Deborah Ohrn []
CON
Please keep your government hands out of my vagina!
07-11-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
Our country is not your church. Womens bodies are none of your business.
07-11-2023
Deborah Jacobi [Individual citizen]
CON
This intrusion into women's health is harmful on many levels. It is out of step with the majority of Iowans views. Please vote against this bill. If any legal action is taken, it should be to hold discussions with Iowans.
07-11-2023
Dawn Dillman []
CON
I grew up in Iowa and was always so proud of Iowa for being a place that valued its individuals. Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain seemed a very appropriate motto for our great state. This bill, however, steps away from that allowing the state to take away rights from individuals who form the majority of the state women. I have two children who I am raising and I fear that they will be put in the position of not being able to decide whether or not to have a child if they make a mistake as teenagers are often capable of. I worry that they are being sold the message that they dont have control of their lives or their bodies. I hope that the legislature today recognizes that the majority of Iowans do not want severe restrictions to abortion access, as published by the Des Moines Register recently. I hope that the legislature chooses to value womens freedom and liberty to create their lives as they choose. Please vote no on HSB 255.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [Citizen ]
CON
It is inhuman and unconstitutional to put any restriction on what can do to ones own body. Bodily autonomy is one of the aspects our country was founded on. If your concern is that there will not be enough people to fill the working class then make better programs for people to use to raise a family ie affordable healthcare, mandatory maternity leave, ensuring our environment will provide a future, wages people can actually live on. Ensuring a happy and promised future is the way to make people have more children. NOT banning or restricting an accessibility to womens healthcare such as abortion.
07-11-2023
Valerie [None]
CON
I don't understand why Reynolds insists on pushing agenda that more than half of Iowans are against. The government has no right to force women to bring fetuses into a world that is already struggling to support the life that currently exists on it. Why aren't there forced programs to get kids out of the foster systems? What about universal free school lunch? Health care?? Child care?? No one seems to care much about the kids failing in the system now.. but let's force a bunch of women into giving birth to babies they don't want.
07-11-2023
Valerie [None]
CON
I don't understand why Reynolds insists on pushing agenda that more than half of Iowans are against. The government has no right to force women to bring fetuses into a world that is already struggling to support the life that currently exists on it. Why aren't there forced programs to get kids out of the foster systems? What about universal free school lunch? Health care?? Child care?? No one seems to care much about the kids failing in the system now.. but let's force a bunch of women into giving birth to babies they don't want.
07-11-2023
Jim Pfaff []
CON
61% percent of all Iowans say abortion should be legal in all or most cases, while only 35% of Iowans support making it illegal. More importantly, 70% of Iowa women say abortion should be legal in all or most cases. In recent years, law, after law passed and signed by the Governor are much more in tune with nationalconservative politics than Iowans' wishes. Please remember that when you vote on this bill, you were elected to serve the people of Iowa, not ALEC and other organizations forcing their political views on the rest of us. Yes, you won your elections, but they occur every two years. Winning elections is one thing, and governing the people who elected you is something else. Patience is wearing thin.
07-11-2023
Jane Dupuis [none]
CON
Why not put decisions like this on the ballot and allow Iowans to vote on it?I believe a woman's decision of whether to have an abortion should be left to her and her doctor. I do NOT believe the Iowa legislature should put the 6week "fetal heartbeat" law in place.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Majority of Iowans disagree with restricting bodily autonomy for women. Please, listen to the wants of Iowans: Your Constituents.
07-11-2023
Tim Veatch []
CON
Please represent Iowans who overwhelmingly oppose this bill and demand their reproductive rights.
07-11-2023
Miriam Timmer-Hackert []
CON
Why dont we solve the demand for abortion instead of eliminating the supply? We could make sure birth control is easy to access. We could feed hungry children and house homeless children. Instead you are just giving women less right to control their body than a corpse has. Saying a woman has less rights over her womb than she has in the garbage she sets out for collection.
07-11-2023
Breanne Kula [Citizen ]
CON
It is a human rights violation to limit or criminalize personal medical decisions based on politicians' personal religious beliefs. Medical care is not immoral. Abortion is not immoral. Imposing your religious beliefs on the public IS immoral. No one pushing to restrict human rights has any place in legislation and should be removed from their seat.
07-11-2023
Michelle Mengeling [Iowa citizen]
CON
I disagree with the Governors proposed legislation. The government should not be dictating womens healthcare.
07-11-2023
Jesse W. Lewis []
CON
HSB 255 is a blatant violation of the human right to decide one's personal healthcare.And, as the gravest of contradictions, those who propose HSB 255 are the same who do not support the institutions and the programs that support and sustain life.Therefore, HSB 255 is a law which guarantees humans will be born into a climate of political distress trending toward dismantling the framework which exists to provide ALL lives the basics for stable growth and a modicum of success.
07-11-2023
Tim Gossett []
CON
I am writing to express my strong opposition to the proposed ban on abortions after 6 weeks in Iowa. This legislation would strip women of their right to make decisions about their own bodies, at a time when many women may not even be aware that they are pregnant yet. This legislation is also medically irresponsible: a 6week ban would eliminate access to safe, legal abortions before many women even know they are pregnant. This would force some women to resort to dangerous and potentially lifethreatening measures in order to terminate their pregnancies. Further, it is likely to cause it to be even harder to recruit OB/GYNs to this state at a time when there is already a significant medical shortage.As a Christian, I follow the call to love my neighbors in the same way as I love myself, which is a clarion call to stand on the side people to make their own decision about whether or not to bring a human into this world. Freedom of choice is a human value that should be protected by our legislators. As a business owner, I believe that a state which promotes cruelty toward girls and women by disallowing medical care is not a good environment for business. The inequity of this law is also clear: lawmakers have not taken up equivalent legislation to restrict the rights of men through a mandatory requirement to have a vasectomy at the age of 18. While I am not proposing they do so, I think that's clear evidence that they are not interested in equality for all.I urge legislators to listen to the will of the majority of Iowans and to vote no on HSB255.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [interSTEM]
CON
How is it fair that I get my bodily autonomy stripped yet again? The idea of passing a law mandating organ donations would never occur as it infringes on people's autonomy. How is this any different? I am currently a student at one of the most rigorous schools in the nation. I have had pregnancy scares, including after when I was drugged. This bill would take away my future. Even carrying to term and putting the fetus up for adoption would put me on a leave of absence, forcing me to not be able to graduate in time and throwing my currently promising future to the win. I reserve the right to stand up for my future, decide not to donate my organs after a car accident, get an abortion, and keep the government out of my personal life, just as the Republican Party promises.
07-11-2023
Rachel Wilson [N/A]
CON
Why is Iowa trying to sneak legislation to restrict abortion in the middle of the summer? I fail to see the urgency of calling in a special session. Are we actually trying to avoid the attention while the people of Iowa are enjoying summer vacation?The people of Iowa are very clearly against restricting abortion. A poll by the DesMoines Register last summer showed over 60% said abortion should be legal in most cases.Abortion is not the problem here. It is only a symptom of bigger problems. Nobody in their right mind wants to kill anyone. It is never a choice made with a light heart. Resorting to abortion brings no woman joy. One has only to listen to women. It is always a tragedy and will always be a tragedy. This was written by a French female legislator in 1974! What has changed? Nothing. It is still and should always be a last resort.What are the underlying issues:If contraception was available for free, abortions wouldnt be necessary.Over the roof medical costs: prenatal care, birth and pediatric care can bring most people into bankruptcy. Paying for health insurance is the same as paying a second mortgageUnavailable quality child care: not everyone has a supporting family to help take care of a newborn or a toddler. Most families cannot afford to have only one working parent. Unfortunately, the second job is usually barely enough to pay for child care.Mental health: once again, not everybody has a supporting family or even a partner to help raise a child. When children are wanted and not forced upon parents, they are cared for and raised properly. A study in 2019 by Stanford University about New York City in the 1980s showed that RoeVWade was the reason behind the reduction of crime in the city. Adoption is not always an option: How many children are in the foster home care system? How much money does it cost the state of Iowa to care for these children? How many turn into respectable members of society? How many instead turn into criminals? See above the study in New York City.Iowa currently has a restriction on abortion after 20 weeks. Why does it need to be changed? Women who seek an abortion do so right away or not at all. In order to seek an abortion, one has to know that she is pregnant first. Even for parents trying to conceive and looking for signs of pregnancy, 6 weeks is just the beginning of the journey. If you are not looking for the signs, you will not know until later, much too late to seek treatment if the law is changed.Banning abortion does not stop abortions from happening, theyre just not performed safely anymore or force an already troubled woman to travel to another state to get care.Why should an existing citizen have less rights than an unborn fetus who can not survive on its own? Women are full fledged humans capable of thoughts. Why is the government saying the contrary? How different is this new bill to any of the laws in islamic countries that restrict women's ability to drive a car? Why is religion so integrated with the government? What happened to the separation of Church and State?People know what is best for themselves. Look at other states or countries where abortion is legal, does every woman suddenly decide to have one? Have the birth rates declined?As a representative of the people, you do need to listen to the people. Politics have turned into a trench war with Republicans on one side and Democrats on the other. Each side going deeper and deeper into their own hole where nobody can see outside anymore. Well the majority of the people are in the middle. And you are not seeing what is really happening to us. There is more to life than abortion and gun rights.SincerelyRachel Wilson
07-11-2023
John Shelton [Advancing American Freedom]
PRO
Since the Dobbs decision came down, we have seen states act boldly to save tens of thousands of unborn lives. We are excited to see this legislation advance in Iowa and hope that other legislative bodies around the nation will work diligently to acknowledge the sanctity of life in law.
Attachment
07-11-2023
Patrick G. Shoemaker [voter]
CON
This is not the way to approach this issue: rather than calling a special session in the midde of the summer for this restricted purpose, the matter should be put before the voters during a regular election. Only then will the popular will be adequately expressed.
07-11-2023
Sydney Danker Efkamp []
CON
I am living in Kansas currently, but Iowa has always been my home and where I grew up. It is only right I fight for women's rights alongside some of my amazing role models.
07-11-2023
Madison Atwood [n/a]
CON
I would implore the legislature to not pass this law. It puts women at risk, and is not scientifically backed.
07-11-2023
Betty Pratt [concerned citizen]
PRO
Each and every being has the right to life. Every woman and man has the right to choose, but that choice occurs at the act BEFORE inception. When a couple makes the choice to be together intimately, they should know there is the possibility of creating a life. With most all choices we make as human beings, also comes a responsibility for our actions! If you are not ready to be responsible for the existence of a human being, you are not ready for the 1st choice of sexual human intimacy. Why would we allow a human being to suffer death for your own selfish desires and irresponsibility?
07-11-2023
Anonymous [Democratic Central Committee ]
CON
Every woman should have the right to choose. The final decision concerning an abortion should be between the woman and her doctor. Not congress. Not the government. Just the woman herself.
07-11-2023
Kristy Hartsgrove Mooers [Self]
CON
This law does not represent the will of the voters. It is an attack of our civil rights and the bodily autonomy of every Iowan. Please listen to the 61 percent of Iowa voters who have consistently polled against abortion bans, and not the Hoover Institutes and the Koch Brothers and the ALECs and all the other wealthy organizations that want to see American citizens freedom curtailed in every possible way. Stand for us, not for them.
07-11-2023
Rev. Marion Pruitt-Jefferson []
CON
I am an Evangelical Lutheran Church in America pastor and I oppose additional restrictions to abortion access in Iowa. As a follower of Jesus, I am wholeheartedly "prolife" which means supporting, nurturing, encouraging, and upholding the needs of the hungry, the unemployed, those who are unustly incarcerated, generous support for public eductaion, full legal and social protections for those who identify as LGBTQIA+, those experience discrimination due to racism, and fully supporting women's reproductive health care needs.
07-11-2023
Grace Pettit []
PRO
It is our duty to speak up for the rights of persons who cannot speak for themselves. DNA proves that an unborn baby is indeed a person. This is a human rights issue and should not be a political or religious issue. Please stand up for the rights of the unborn! I am a lifelong Democrat and I used to be on the prochoice side; however, I've come to understand that this is not a political issue, but a human rights issue! Our precious babies who have not even had a chance to be born are our most vulnerable; therefore, we must speak up, on their behalf, for their human rights. The right to life is the most basic of all human rights!
07-11-2023
Jenelle Jensen [Teacher]
CON
Human rights are being violated here.
07-11-2023
Barb Buchanan []
PRO
I was Director of the Cedar Rapids Clinic for Women for 30 years. I have experienced the gratitude of women who terminated a pregnancy, and the joy of women who kept their pregnancies. 70 percent of women in Iowa believe that the choice to bear a child or not is the women's decision. It is not a court, not a govenor, nor a president that can make that decision. Repeoductive decisions are BEST made by the woman.I urge you to not support this bill. The decision you make today will be remembered.I remain prochoicce, prowoman!Barb Buchanan
07-11-2023
Bethany Reicks [Healthcare ]
CON
Iowans would not vote for this bill. Represent your constituents.
07-11-2023
Annie Martin [None]
CON
This is so dangerous for many women. Many don't know if they are pregnant, where the pregnancy is, how the pregnancy is developing at this point and will need the option of abortion at later times for the pregnancy. I also have friends who have already weakened uterine walls and a pregnancy would be life threatening and we know that contraceptives are not 100%. Please don't take this away safe medical practice away from women.
07-11-2023
Barbara Wilson []
CON
STOP MAKING DECISIONS FOR WOMEN! We don't need nor want politicians,any church or anyone else to control our reproductive health. This liberty belongs to the individual woman! I will make this my primary issue for voting, supporting candidates and speaking out until all women are guaranteed the liberty to not be subjected to government mandated pregnancies.
07-11-2023
Rhonda Cooper []
CON
Pro Choice!b
07-11-2023
Beverly Hannon []
CON
Let women decide what to do with their own bodies. Period.
07-11-2023
Amy Shuttleworth []
CON
"Freedom" includes the right to make decisions about your body. Unwanted pregnancies can be prevented by vasectomies. Is the next law to mandate vasectomies?
07-11-2023
Kathryn Kaul-Goodman []
CON
I am against this abortion ban. If our governor and legislators really want to be prolife they should support Medicaid extension for 12 months after birth, access to affordable child care, paid family leave, and many other measures that would help alleviate the tough economic circumstances that often lead women to feeling like abortion is their only viable option. Instead this is about controlling and punishing poor women and not about supporting life.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [personal]
CON
Apparently you have decided Iowans deserve to be last in the country for OB docs per capita. We're already secondtolast, and it takes up to 3 hours to get to a specialist. I had 3 highrisk pregnancies, and I was fortunate not to have UIHC close by to handle my severe preeclampsia. My niece is pregnant now with a condition in which one of the 2 arteries in her placenta is missing. The fetus could easily miscarry, and it's at 18 weeks right now. If I lose my niece over a partial miscarriage and sepsis because the fetus is hanging on with a heartbeat after her water breaks...it's your fault. I wish you cared, but you don't. You only care about your donors and worry that Reynolds won't endorse you in your next election if you vote against her. That's a pretty pathetic reason to vote for what you know is wrong and goes against what Iowans want. You're destroying the state. Our rights. If you really care about babies, then make sure women have access to prenatal care, to WIC, to support services, daycare...and safe, strong public schools. Oh, wait. You're against all that, too. Rape assistance? Bird got rid of that. So the "for rape victims" clause is hollow. Just a ruse. And you know you'll find a way for one of your family members to get an abortion in another state because you have the means to do so. You must really hate the poor, all the while making sure they stay down where they belong. VOTE NO.
07-11-2023
Dr. Isaiah Petersen []
CON
I am a conservative and am against this bill. This is not, in any way, a bill that is for the betterment of society. Forcing a child onto anyone who is not economically, emotionally, or heaven forbid physically prepared for the responsibility of having and raising a child is a recipe for poor outcomes. Any legislator voting yes to this bill knows this. It is only due to some sort of moral blinders that they are able to suppress this intuition; as if their personal view of morality is wholly correct. 20 weeks gestation is restrictive enough. At 7 weeks, while a heartbeat may be present on ultrasound, the baby is not viable outside the mothers womb. Is a heartbeat what makes us human? Is that what we, your constituents, are reduced to? Are we nothing more than a beating heart that can check a box next your name? Just for you to turn up your chin at the morally inferior that just want safe, reliable family planning options, and proceed to cast your vote in favor a majority of Iowans do not support? I reject this assertion. A heartbeat is not what makes us human. A heartbeat is not all it takes to live. You may say that medically, a heartbeat is necessary. To which, as a licensed physician, I would agree. But this isnt a medical issue, is it? Because if it was you would listen to every state and national medical association decrying bills such as these. What makes us human is our ability to make decisions at a level higher than any other organism on this planet. And weve found, as evidenced by the prevalence of democracy, that the more people involved in the decision; the better the outcome. So listen to your people. The people of the great state of Iowa, of which I am born and raised, dont want this bill. Strike it down and send a message that Iowa is a conservative state that still understands the value brought by those on the other side of the aisle that may help us with our blind spotssomething no one is immune from. Be confident enough in conservative values to see that extremism is not the way forward. Vote No to this bill.
07-11-2023
Stella Herzig []
CON
I am a mother of three and my daughter almost died from an ectopic pregnancy in the 12th week. If you make this ban, she would have died, while doctors would most certainly hesitate to save her life for fear of the iowa government. There was a fetal heartbeat til the very end as she was bleeding out my daughter , raised with love and many resources beloved by her husband and family, You would sacrifice her in place of a nonviable heartbeat that was killing her and could never be brought to term. Let doctors do their work. Legislators have no right to deny the the liberty of grown persons to determine intimate and life saving procedures. You say you are prolife, yet this new bill would have murdered my grown beautiful daughter! Let the present law stand. I am opposed to your six week folly of a bill.
07-11-2023
Brian Hutzell [self]
CON
The GOP is antiabortion, but it is NOT prolife. This attempt to restrict abortion rights has nothing to do with science, medicine, or compassion. It is nothing more than a cheap political ploy, an appeal to the MAGA Republicans.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [n/a]
CON
I dont feel the legislature improves peoples well being and is harmful.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [private citizen]
CON
The Supreme Court has left it up to the citizens of the State of Iowa to decide about how to regulate abortion. Accordingly, I am writing to express my opposition to this bill. I respectfully urge each member of the Iowa legislature to vote in a way that faithfully represents the majority view of the constituents of their district. Thank you for your consideration.Sincerely,Michael R. Rebagliati
07-11-2023
Anna Holland []
CON
The majority of Iowans, 60%, do not want an abortion ban in this state. Give us the liberty to choose, and trust women to manage their own healthcare and their own lives. We do not need the condescending, parental concern of legislators who think they know what is best without knowing us.
07-11-2023
M. Michele Martins, M. D. [Physician ]
CON
Women should have access to ALL healthcare, including abortion, without interference from the government.
07-11-2023
Nancy Ostrognai []
CON
How ironic that the people supposedly benefit the fetus also believe that child labor is a good thing.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [Na]
CON
I am a not a vagina hat wearing, protest attending, sign holder, but I am an educated, Christian,female who strongly opposes these decisions being made by elected officials who majored in everything but medicine rather than medical professionals and the women involved in this decision.
07-11-2023
Tracey Wyatt [Private citizen ]
CON
Further restrictions on abortion are absolutely ill advised. Abortion should be a safe and legal decision made between an individual and their health care provider. I am a woman, a mother, and a nurse.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [Womenâ??s rights ]
CON
I think I should be able to make my own decisions. If Im raped I should be able to have an abortion. If my personal health is threatened I should be able to have an abortion if the baby may have a hard life with health issues why put someone through that if not needed. I believe women should have rights this isnt the handmaids tale and we will not go backwards I thought we were the land of the free but apparently its the land of kinda free unless you are a women. Men can go do what they want to prevent pregnancy including having a procedure done to shoot blanks but women still have to fight this. The most I see about it is religious reasons why we should stop it but I thought we are supposed to keep religion and state separate.
07-11-2023
Cindy Wilson []
CON
Against this bill!! Hands off our bodies.
07-11-2023
Amy Sundermann []
CON
This proposed legislation contradicts the will of the majority of the people of Iowa. It reflects the extremism of the Iowa Republican Party, which bullies and torments the most vulnerable in our communities while pandering to national farright extremist groups.
07-11-2023
Sara Castlebury []
CON
Keep abortion legal. Your religious beliefs don't belong in other's doctor's offices.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
PRO
A woman Should have a choice for whatever reason. Please ban any laws against abortionPro abortion
07-11-2023
Bethenyanne Miller-Stark []
CON
The government should not be in charge of individuals health care choices
07-11-2023
Elizabeth A. Newbury []
CON
Abortion, as any other health care decision, should be a private decision between a pregnant person and their healthcare provider. Theocratic politicians have no business legislating removal of the fundamental human right of bodily autonomy from a large swath of our state population.Trust Iowans to make their own health care decisions.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I urge you to vote against the passage of HSB 255.I do not appreciate that this session has been called to subvert the will of the majority of Iowans. I do not appreciate that the bill's passage would mean half of all Iowans would possess fewer rights than trash and that some of them will die as a result. I do not appreciate the governor playing with our lives like this.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [Wing]
CON
I stand with my fellow Iowans demanding the state legislature listen to it's constituency regarding their desires to have reproductive freedom.
07-11-2023
Barb [Wheelock]
PRO
I am absolutely against a six week ban on a portion, I am against any ban on the question
07-11-2023
Logan Schroeder []
CON
This bill is not what is best for Iowa. Maternal care in rural Iowa is incredibly strained. This bill will actively drive future physicians and OBGYNs, like myself, out of the state. Iowans know what is best for their reproductive care.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Numerous studies confirm that access to legal abortion improves womens and families' economic and social lives. Being denied an abortion creates economic hardship, financial insecurity, health risks, and death for women and their children (Amnesty International, American Academy of Pediatrics, National Institute of Health, and The Turnaway Study: Ten Years, a Thousand Women, and the Consequences of Havingor Being Deniedan Abortion, 2020)The decision to have an abortion belongs to a womxn, their doctor, NOT legislators."Without the power to make decisions about our own bodies, there is no democracy." Gloria Steinem
07-11-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
Please keep abortion legal and safe in iowa. This is a medical issue not an issue for government.
07-11-2023
Kelly Sidran [St. Ambrose University]
CON
My 17 year old granddaughter now has fewer rights than I have had my entire 57 years of life. We are Americans...we do not take rights away...we give them to our citizens. Do the right thing.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [Des Moines University]
CON
This is a dangerous, extremist ban that will harm more women than fetuses it will 'save.' This violates doctors' ability to practice and will drive them out of Iowa. As a fourth year medical student, I will. Not. Practice in this state (my home state) with this ban.
07-11-2023
Sara Ramsey [None]
CON
This will endanger the lives of women and bring children into the world who will not be cared for or protected by this governing body claiming to want to protect them.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
My body, my choice.
07-11-2023
Judith Curtis-Latessa []
CON
As the Des Moines Register has published several articles identifying that most faith leaders do not support this ban as well as 61% of Iowans in favor of abortion, I want to add my voice to this very divisive issue.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
Women should have all rights to their own body!!!!
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
This incredibly difficult decision should only be made between a woman, her family and health provider. Legislators should activity provide better answers to reduce the number of abortion via access to and education of contraceptive care. Colorado has had great success in cutting down on teen pregnancies by making long term contraceptive care available for free to teen females. This has greatly reduced the need for abortions by this group. Consider the social problems of young, unprepared woman giving birth to unwanted children. In the long term, this costs the taxpayers. Also, you are passing laws that the majority of Iowans are against. Please work FOR the people of Iowa and listen to what they want for their state.
07-11-2023
Matthew Peterson []
PRO
A woman should have full autonomy to choose what is best for her body and her pregnancy as long as its warranted based on any reason other than just simply unwanted.
07-11-2023
Gina Trimble [None]
CON
I thought Republicans were for LESS government?? Do not change the abortion laws!!
07-11-2023
Anonymous [None]
CON
This bill is an abomination. Abortions will still happen, but it will be significantly more dangerous for the mother. Keep your religious opinions out of legislation. You are impeding on the rights of tax paying citizens. You don't consider a fetus a person when it comes to taxes, so they do not count as people.
07-11-2023
Nicole Devens []
CON
Abortion is healthcare and a woman should have the right to make decisions about her own body, not the government.
07-11-2023
Laney Guintard []
CON
I oppose this bill. It IS NOT the majority of Iowans wish to pass a restrictive bill of this nature. Governor Reynolds claims that she is working to protect unborn life, but this life could not survive without the mother at 6 weeks. The rights of a fullyformed human with feelings, personality, and connections in the world are being placed over a fetus that has never been outside the womb. If this legislation passes, It will be clear that the value of a living Iowan womans heartbeat is of less value than a fetus that could not survive without her beating heart. Iowan women deserve better than this. I urge legislators to trust women to make the right decisions for them and their families with their doctor, NOT Governor Reynolds or the Legislative body. Do not cave to the clamoring minority of Iowans who see motherhood as a spiritual experience or a religious or moral duty. Some Iowans are NOT cut out to be parents, some Iowans DO NOT WANT to be parents, and some Iowans WILL experience devastating or fatal situations because of laws like this. Trust Iowa Women.
07-11-2023
Lisa Banitt, MD []
CON
Organs may not be taken from a corpse for a transplant without consent. A person cannot be forced to donate even so much as a drop of blood without their permission. Why? Because they are granted bodily autonomy. Women also have the right to bodily autonomy and cannot be forced to remain pregnant if that is not their choice. Vote no on this bill that would strip women of their bodily autonomy!
07-11-2023
BJ Chambers [No]
CON
I come to speak to you today, so that one or two of you may listen to the truth what kind of state is this? What kind of state is Iowa? What country am I living in? What kind of freedom is this? I am a woman and I am a person a fetus is not a person, nor a baby its my body in my toy your body is your choice. Dont limit my freedom with your morals. Dont try to control my body with your beliefs. I want the world to know how unjust this bill is, and how prejudiced it is, putting the rights of embryos and fetuses above the rights of women who are you to decide for me it is My Ride its not yours talk to your guy about your choices, but dont legislate mineThank you for your time
07-11-2023
Robert Wyatt []
CON
I oppose this bill and urge the Republican party, of which I am still a member, to reject this radical trampling of women's rights. Actions like this are convincing me that the party does not deserve to be in power.
07-11-2023
BJ Chambers [No]
CON
I come to speak to you today, so that one or two of you may listen to the truth what kind of state is this? What kind of state is Iowa? What country am I living in? What kind of freedom is this? I am a woman and I am a person a fetus is not a person, nor a baby its my body in my toy your body is your choice. Dont limit my freedom with your morals. Dont try to control my body with your beliefs. I want the world to know how unjust this bill is, and how prejudiced it is, putting the rights of embryos and fetuses above the rights of women who are you to decide for me it is My Ride its not yours talk to your guy about your choices, but dont legislate mineThank you for your time
07-11-2023
Cameron Vannoy [Medical Student]
CON
I am writing in protest against this socalled "heartbeat" bill. Before we even talk about the medical concerns associated with these bills, it is important to note that MOST Iowans support the right to safe and legal abortions legislators are supposed to uphold the wishes of the people. Second, the ONLY people who belong in the medical exam/procedure room are the provider and the patient. The government has no place in making medical decisions for Iowans. Finally, from other states that have enacted such abhorrent legislation, we know that the maternal and fetal death rates rise after such bills are passed. Iowa already has maternal care deserts, and women face enormous barriers to pregnancy and prenatal care. Let's not make the problem worse. Beyond all of this, if this bill is passed it will further the difficulty Iowa hospitals already face when trying to recruit physicians to train and practice medicine here. As a medical student myself who always wanted to stay in Iowa, I can firmly say that this legislation would further push me to consider moving to nearby states that would not put my life at risk for political gain. Minnesota is looking better every day and I know many of my peers feel the same way. You wonder why young people don't want to live in Iowa? We aren't safe here. I could die because the Iowa legislature wants to play politics with my body. Please listen to the majority of Iowans and do not pass this terrible legislation. Keep abortion safe and legal.
07-11-2023
M. Michele Martins, M. D. [Physician ]
CON
Women should have access to ALL healthcare, including abortion, without interference from the government.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Not that it will make any sort of difference to the current representatives, but it is imperative to keep healthcare, including abortion and contraception, safe and legal in the state of Iowa. We've repeatedly seen circumstances in other states after they pass abortion restrictions that these restrictions have serious and fatal results for people. This is not "prolife". This is about forcing births that may not be viable, healthy, or safe. If you really want to save lives, you would protect trans kids, fund school lunch programs so ALL children have access to healthy food, and increase access to sex education and reproductive freedom.
07-11-2023
Eddie Bruce [Green Party ]
CON
Please let women have personal choice between her and her doctor decide about her health decisions including to have a safe abortionCriminalizing abortion will not stop abortions, just make them less safeForcing women to have a child against her will is barbarism Please uphold the separation between Church and State
07-11-2023
Rebecca Kauten [Private Citizen]
CON
I firmly believe in reproductive freedom and choice for all women.
07-11-2023
Tony Colby [elf]
CON
Enough of restricting women's right!!!!!
07-11-2023
Hilary Higgens []
CON
I am glad to be menopausal and not have to personally deal with your entrance to my womb. However, as a woman, a human this kind of intrusion into human rights by THE GOVERNMENT is fiercely frightening. The introduction of GOD into governments actions is against the Constitutional separation of church and state. The fervor of our states' government appears rabid. I for the first time in my 63 years am embarrassed to come from Iowa. I was raised on a farm that became a Century Farm 40 years ago. My history with Iowa is rich and vast. I do not want to be from YOUR IOWA. The majority of Iowans don't want this. Do you care? NO. When Trump was campaigning in 2020 Kim Renolds was passing out MAGA hats and looked like she was post coitius. Good thing she didn't get pregnant.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [Citizen ]
CON
It is inhuman and unconstitutional to put any restriction on what can do to ones own body. Bodily autonomy is one of the aspects our country was founded on. If your concern is that there will not be enough people to fill the working class then make better programs for people to use to raise a family ie affordable healthcare, mandatory maternity leave, ensuring our environment will provide a future, wages people can actually live on. Ensuring a happy and promised future is the way to make people have more children. NOT banning or restricting an accessibility to womens healthcare such as abortion.
07-11-2023
Tarrill Abney []
CON
Iowa needs to support health care for all Iowans.
07-11-2023
Cat Reyes Phelps [NARAL Pro-Choice America]
CON
Every Iowan should be able to choose whether or not to bear the burden of parenthood. This bill would force thousands of unwanted lives to be created. Imagine the pain of living in a household where you aren't loved, wanted, or cared for. This is a pain more massive than most can fathom. Every fetus that is forced to grow up in an unsafe household carries that burden for their whole life. Forcing that upon anyone is immoral. Because of this, I vehemently oppose HSB 255.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [self]
CON
Please know that changing the abortion ruling to only allow up to 6weeks will detrimentally impact pregnant individuals in Iowa. The average time when a pregnancy is realized is between 68 weeks. That does not leave enough time for the incredibly difficult decision to make for someone about their body, and their life going forward, should the pregnancy be brought to term. Abortion care is healthcare. Please give the grace for women making these tough decisions for their bodies. We need the autonomy to make our decisions for our bodies. Thank you.
07-11-2023
Maia Boell [N/A]
CON
I demand reproductive freedom for all Iowans, regardless of sexual orientation or gender identity. Access to safe and legal abortions is pivotal in keeping all Iowans safe. For it is not a matter of if Iowans will be negatively impacted by this policy, it is simply a matter of when. Countless Iowans will die if this policy is enacted. Let it stand that this policy does not reflect the wishes of the general population. Let it also be understood that this bill will not put a stop to abortions, rather it will simply make them more dangerous. This will cause death. As stated on our states flag, Our liberties we prize and our rights we will maintain, Iowans deserve to maintain their reproductive liberties. Thank you.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [Independent person]
CON
This is a political grab and a complete disregard to what IOWANS actually want. The majority of Iowans are PRO CHOICE. Kim Reynolds is going against what Iowans want and going after fellow womens bodies. She says that parents control the decisions for their children and their education, but takes away the power to decide if they actually bring a child into their environment. The majority of women also do not catch pregnancies until after 6 weeks. This doesnt allow women the chance to make decision and is extreme. You can rebuttal by saying that adoption is always an option but fail to realize that thousands of children are missing in the system, thousands of children never get a home or are placed in unsafe homes, or grow up on hard and confusing paths in life. Kim doesnt care about womens rights or what benefits Iowans, only what is good for her. Which is why she rushed this hearing and is not allowing the public the time to fight this. This is wrong. Kim is wrong. Shame on us for allowing her back into office, taking away rights and wasting tax payers money. More than what she has already wasted. Shame on you.
07-11-2023
Susan Arland []
CON
A woman never knows when a pregnancy can become a medical problem nor when she might need medical intervention. A woman being forced to bear and raise a child when she is not ready, or has been forced upon her by rape or incest, will only decrease the bonding and attachment with the infant. This will have devastating effects on the mental health of this youngster as they grow up which will lead to more violence in our communities.
07-11-2023
Finnegan Riley Meadows []
CON
I am not in support of HSB 255. This is an unconstitutional bill and places undue burden on people seeking abortion services. People that don't believe in abortion already have the choice not to have one. Reproductive justice is an essential part of basic healthcare, bodily autonomy, and religious freedom. As a healthcare provider, I believe people with unwanted pregnancies deserve compassion, not judgment.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Restrictions on abortion does not save lives nor does it protect life, it is another form of control and it harms so many marginalized communities to an already failing system. The choice of having an abortion should be accessible to all human beings without any barriers to ensure the upmost quality of life for all. Abortion is healthcare and a human right. We must act to protect it and to continue pushing for reproductive justice. Power to the people.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Voting for this bill opens up the door to allow government to have a say in ALL medical decisions made between an individual and a medical professional. If this bill passes and we allow government to have a say in what someone MUST do to their bodies, can we vote on forced vasectomies for all men? Wouldn't that be the easier option here? Easier, yes. Morally right, no.Not a single member voting on the bill today has a medical license or is an expert in reproductive health. How can you vote on putting womens' lives at risk when you have little to zero knowledge on how this bill will affect the women, the children, and the fathers in Iowa? Your personal beliefs and this bill have no right to even be up for debate. How dare you use your power to consider restricting an individual's personal rights.
07-11-2023
Jenelle Jensen [Teacher]
CON
Human rights are being violated here.
07-11-2023
Kerri True-Funk []
CON
I am against this ban, as it is not rooted in medical science, is a governmental overreach, and does not protect victims of sexual violence. Iowa must protect and support children living in this state, and this blatantly ignores the needs of families already in existence.
07-11-2023
Brianne Sanchez []
CON
I strongly oppose this limit on women's reproductive freedom and access to healthcare.
07-11-2023
Jenelle Jensen [Teacher]
CON
Human rights are being violated here.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Pregnancy is a unique and complex condition. As someone who became pregnant during "advanced maternal age," I was aware of a number of health threats to me and my baby for which abortion might be the safest option. The government should protect our rights from political and/or religious positions by allowing health care providers and pregnant people the autonomy to continue or terminate a pregnancy. No one should be forced to carry a pregnancy. It is a right of basic human bodily autonomy. Please focus on supporting healthy pregnancies and families in other ways.
07-11-2023
Thomas Benzoni [Self]
CON
Vote against this bill.This is an effort by people outside IA to control Iowans.If you are sincere about this, put forth a constitutional amendment. Let the people speak instead of following the orders of outofstate donors that are attempting to divide and conquer the people of IA.
07-11-2023
Kyrstin Delagardelle [Iowa resident]
CON
My name is Kyrstin Delagardelle and I grew up in rural Iowa. I was a 4H member, I volunteered at my church, and I graduated in a class of 150, made possible by the consolidation of multiple rural districts. Since I was a kid, Ive always had big dreams. I wanted to be an Olympic figure skater, the editor of the DSM Register, a cooking show host, or a travel writer. None of those dreams included children of my own. I have taken appropriate actions to prevent pregnancy and Ive been lucky. Ive had partners who understood my wish to not have children and respected it. I have not been forced into a position I didnt want where a pregnancy could happen. I have not needed to visit a doctor to discuss my options when getting pregnant, but it was comforting to know that it was always there. It was reassuring to know that all medically available procedures were there to support my choices about my body. The thought of having the government able to limit and decide what medical procedures I have access to isnt freedom. If you dont want to have an abortion, dont have one. But for the rest of us, no one needs to or should know, except the doctors who we trust for our care.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Abortion should not ever be restricted, it should be accessible for all and do all that is possible to ensure reproductive healthcare for our communities. A restriction on abortion is not to protect life nor save it, its a form of excessive control and disproportionately harms people of color and other marginalized communities in an already failed system. Restrictions are significantly dangerous. We must act to ensure reproductive justice for all. I encourage you to pay attention to people who are asking for no bans ever. Abortion is a human right, it is healthcare. We will not stop fighting until true reproductive justice is guaranteed for all without any barriers, obstacles, and restrictions in the way to live a beautiful, healthful life. Power to the people.
07-11-2023
Aunya Harms [NARAL Pro-Choice America ]
CON
As an Iowan, I oppose this bill. We should not pass an abortion ban in our state that will block people from having the freedom to decide what happens to their own bodies. Please oppose HSB 255 and do not pass an abortion ban.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [personal]
CON
Prohibiting someone from making choices about their own body is ridiculous and antifreedom in every possible way.
07-11-2023
Jim Waterbury []
CON
If you don't have a uterus, you don't have skin in the game. A 6week ban is a cruel joke designed to elevate Governor Reynolds' credibility to primary voters. If you don't understand that, know this: 60% of Iowans including this one want you to stay out of healthcare. We'll be there to say so in November 2024.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [Voter]
CON
Its a sad state of affairs when our legislators ignore the values and opinions of their constituents and vote their own feelings. This current group have only power and control in mind!
07-11-2023
Judy Russell [Carlisle Alumni Assn.]
CON
It is important to listen to the people. The majority clearly are okay with our abortion laws as written. No need to change them to satisfy the political agenda of a governor who will leave Iowa as soon as a job offer is granted in a higher position.
07-11-2023
Jon Oliver []
CON
Most Iowans are fine the way it is so why not just leave it alone.
07-11-2023
Kirsten Faisal []
CON
Iowa is not a theocracy. Legislation must be based on facts, science, and medicine if it is to protect the health and wellbeing of people living in this state. The legislature was not formed to make medical decisions. The legislature was not formed to make religious decisions. The legislature was not formed to take away human rights but to ensure they are protected. Living breathing women must have more rights than corpses or literal garbage. You cannot force me to give up my body for any use: not to work someone's farm, not to give my kidney to someone who will die without the donation, not to an embryo. Being forced to continue an unwanted pregnancy is the ultimate act of involuntary servitude. It is unAmerican in every principle.
07-11-2023
Bobbi Borich []
CON
I want to make a comment for the public record. Im in favor of safe legal abortions in Iowa. If we do not allow abortions to continue in our state, we are moving backwards, not forward! People that say NO ABORTIONS AT ALL, have very tunnel vision! Once these bans are in place it is NOT only about the unborn fetus. We are already losing OBGYN physicians & healthcare workers for fear of retribution. Is this what we want for our state? We have one of the best Medical Schools in the country, the University of Iowa. Theyre already feeling the effects of doctors not wanting to go into OBGYN. Both women & children will die for lack of quality healthcare & the decisions of when pregnancy termination IS the best procedure. The GOP wants to protect the unborn. But once those unborn babies are here, they will forget about them! They dont care if these babies are born into poverty, physical & mental deformities, how they will be fed, clothed & where will they live, what if they are trans, gay, black or Mexican? Will the GOP still care? Hell no! They want white supremacy to be the only race in this country. SHAME, SHAME ON YOU!YOU WILL NOT CONTROL US!
07-11-2023
Molly Knoll [None]
CON
Please do not take away women's health rights. All women deserve the right to health care.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I believe in my body, my choice. Women deserve the respect that they know what is best for themselves and their body.
07-11-2023
Andrew Kelley []
CON
As these public comments show, and polling across Iowa has consistently shown, Iowans are opposed to this bill. Extremist politicians have no place in deciding when a woman chooses to start a family or seek needed medical care. Elected Republicans need to represent their constituents' wishes and civil liberties. Otherwise, they need to publicly admit they are not working in good faith as representatives to the people, but in service of an unpopular extreme ideology.
07-11-2023
Rich Young [private citizen]
CON
As reported by the Des Moines register, an October 2022 poll showed that 61% of ALL IOWANS believe abortion should remain LEGAL in all or most cases. As our elected representatives, you are bound to heed the majority. Vote NO on any legislation that further restricts women's rights or access to abortion in Iowa.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [Private citizen]
CON
Womens heathcare decisions should be between them and their doctor. Not the government.
07-11-2023
Tim McGee []
CON
Stealing women's rights!!
07-11-2023
Brenda Mayer []
CON
This bill is an invasion of medical care. And it assumes too much of our youngest victims with its time bounds on reported rape and incest. What child whose family or life is threatened will report abuse? And how does this respond and assist rape victims to report? It places a onerous burden on already traumatized victims. This bill also assumes medical knowledge that is not held by the ones voting. Abortion is a complex issue that cannot be answered with a swift complete denial of access. It will create more medically complex pregnancies that we, as the state of Iowa, are not equipped nor has this body indicated any desire to assist in paying for those pregnancies and possible resulting complex medically complex infants. This bill, also, lays an additional burden to the poor, for those of means have always and will always have means to circumvent this law with their ability to pay and travel. This bill is morally wrong, unChristian, and unconstitutional. It is morally wrong in that it punishes people based on their income status. It is unChristian in that it is not lovingly designed , for Christ, above all, said that we would be recognized by our love. It is unconstitutional at the national level as it embraces the theology, the religion of a small minority as the overarching religion of us all.
07-11-2023
Ian Steenhoek []
CON
This bill goes against the will of Iowans.
07-11-2023
Claire Kuttler []
CON
As an Iowa native, I am writing to strongly oppose this dangerous legislation that will ultimately harm the people of Iowa. I support and am joyful about people choosing to have children, should they so want to. It is inhumane and in many cases physically dangerous to force people to carry pregnancies to term because of restrictive and extreme abortion proposals like this one.
07-11-2023
Stacy Frelund [American heart association]
CON
State lawmakers now have the opportunity to take action to ensure that new moms have access to the care they need after their babies are born. Iowa is one of only five states in the nation that has failed to extend Medicaid coverage for new moms.As both a mother and working for the American Heart Association, I have personally and professionally witnessed the impact the limited healthcare options for mothers has on families across our state. U.S. maternal mortality rates have more than doubled to an estimated 700 deaths a year in the United States. Heart disease and stroke contribute to 1 in 3 of those deaths, making cardiovascular disease is the No. 1 killer of new moms. Additionally, a growing body of evidence showing some of the most dangerous pregnancyrelated complications, such as preeclampsia, blood clots, and cardiomyopathy may not surface until weeks, or even months, after delivery. More than half of pregnancyrelated deaths occur in the 12month postpartum period, and 12 percent occur after six weeks postpartum, however, an estimated two out of three pregnancy deaths are preventable, making the postpartum period a time of vulnerability for all new mothers. Extension of Medicaid coverage for postpartum women will help ensure new moms have continuous uninterrupted access to care to address their ongoing health needs.I urge leaders to please support expanding access to healthcare for mothers.
07-11-2023
Jean Hitchman []
CON
I am against any legislation that takes reproductive rights away from any citizen. Lets move forward, not back.
07-11-2023
Ann Klingensmith []
CON
Do not interfere with the right of a woman to determine their reproductive choices. This includes a right to decide if a pregnancy is healthy for them within the 20 week window. A 6 week ban is ridiculous. Since this is going to go through, no matter the opinions of most Iowans to keep abortion up to 20 weeks, at least be compassionate enough to provide many medical exceptions for the life of the mother.
07-11-2023
Robin Stoker []
CON
I strong oppose any bill that further regulates abortion in Iowa. It will cause undue burden on pregnant people in Iowa. It will remove their bodily autonomy. It will also be detrimental to the University of Iowa Medical School. Students will no longer come to Iowa to learn because they will not be taught best practice regarding their patients' health and safety. They will not be able to be a true partner in care with their pregnant patients.
07-11-2023
Laurel Shaver []
CON
Kim Reynolds said she was going to protect the rights of all Iowans to make their own healthcare decisions. It is hypocritical to protect some rights and decisions but not others. When the majority of Iowans have expressed their desire to keep abortion legal, it is irresponsible for a governor to abuse her power to go against what her constituents want and need. If this ban passes, people will die, and blood will be on GOP hands.
07-11-2023
Connor Alberhasky []
CON
How many different states have to show how terrible of an idea this is before we all just accept that fact? Sure is a shame that the party of "small government" cannot stop trying to tell people what to do with their own bodies.
07-11-2023
Terri Fredrickson []
PRO
My Body. My Choice. Why are you trying to jam through horrible laws preventing abortions (which are often necessary medical care) that the majority of Iowans do not want? Please stop!
07-11-2023
Emily Haworth []
CON
I am frustrated, though not shocked, that this needs to be said, but Iowas Legislature and its government work for Iowans, the majority of whom support a persons right to make decisions about their own reproductive system. How does it then follow that our state government thinks theyre serving our interests by imposing draconian laws that jeopardize medical freedom, privacy, and the health and safety of women?I could enumerate the many reasons why banning abortion is absurd. Im sure others will today; I hope they do. But this wont be new information to anyone in a position to vote on this bill. Instead, I would like to say: even if HSB 255 wasnt an egregious attempt to push a particular religions views on the public (it is), it is certainly a violation of the peoples trust in their elected officials. Your constituents will ask you about this, and you will have to answer them. Will you tell them that you know better than they do how they should live? Will you tell them that you think they are too stupid to be trusted to make their own medical decisions? Will you tell them that, once elected, you decided to abandon their interests, in favor of a party line?
07-11-2023
Ryan McLerran [N/a]
CON
This bill is a sham that goes against the will of the majority of Iowans. Its no surprise that republicans decide to do a last minute session to go against their constituents, considering you all have never been concerned about the people you are supposed to represent. Anyone who votes to pass this misogynistic bill should be deeply ashamed of themselves.
07-11-2023
Katherine Craven []
CON
This bill is a dangerous threat to womens healthcare. If this is enacted, women will not be able to seek the care they need when there is an emergency situation. As a survivor of a lifethreatening pregnancy, I urge you to vote against this bill. This bill will also limit rape victims ability to access needed healthcare if they dont report the rape within a small window of time. I can only imagine how terrible this will be for children who are not typically in a position to report if they are raped. This bill will hurt women and children in Iowa. Vote no!
07-11-2023
Roxanne Lindaman []
CON
Keep your dirty hands off my reproductive rights!
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
According to the Des Moines Register, the majority of Iowans support the legality abortion. Kim Reynolds is railroading this agenda through the legislature for personal political gain. We Iowans won't let ourselves be her political tool.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I am vehemently against this bill!! The government has no business in a womans healthcare decisions and rights to her own body!! Most women do not even know they are pregnant at 6 weeks and science PROVES that there is no heart formed at 6 weeks. Also RELIGION has no place in government!! DO NOT VOTE FOR THIS BILL!!
07-11-2023
Steven Paulsrud [None]
CON
If you believe you must ban abortions please make exceptions for life of mother rape:incest. Medical Research has shown that a fetus cannot survive outside the uterus before 20 weeks of age after conception. Please do not ban abortion before 20 weeks. This would infringe upon the physician/patient relationship. The minority of Iowans who support abortion should not supersede the majority who favor common sense restrictions on abortion. Please listen to your constituents, sons, daughters, aunts, uncles, grandparents and spouses. They know better than Kim Reynolds!
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
The legislature has no business in such personal choices. My religion is supportive of abortion when it is what the pregnant mother wants and needs. Someone elses religion does not trump that. Stop legislating personal bodily integrity. It is each persons constitutional right to control their own body. Get a life and leave me and my family and all women alone.
07-11-2023
Ronda Page []
CON
I do not support this bill and I beg you to oppose it as well. My body, my health decisions. Keep your religion and your politics out of my health decisions. This bill is a complete over reach onto what should only be the concern of the patient and their health care provider.
07-11-2023
Steven Paulsrud [None]
CON
If you believe you must ban abortions please make exceptions for life of mother rape:incest. Medical Research has shown that a fetus cannot survive outside the uterus before 20 weeks of age after conception. Please do not ban abortion before 20 weeks. This would infringe upon the physician/patient relationship. The minority of Iowans who support abortion should not supersede the majority who favor common sense restrictions on abortion. Please listen to your constituents, sons, daughters, aunts, uncles, grandparents and spouses. They know better than Kim Reynolds!
07-11-2023
Andra DiMarco [Self]
CON
This is not what the majority of Iowans want. And it is not in the best interest of human health.
07-11-2023
Linda Wild []
CON
I do not support this legislation.
07-11-2023
Lora Fraracci [Self]
CON
These kinds of archaic and anti health care policies are why my 22 year old daughter left this state. It's gone too far. A 6 week ban? Most women don't even know their pregnant yet by that time. Especially if they're trying not to get pregnant. I'm ashamed of my State and I hope Independents and Dems stand up for what's right this coming election.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [Waverly Iowa Resident]
CON
Please do not take away a women's right to healthcare when she needs it most. This is critical to our state and future.
07-11-2023
Sandy Lewis [Unity point health]
CON
If this passes and we lose the right to control our bodies with the assistance of our health care providers, not only will women suffer but health care providers will leave Iowa. We will become a state with so few obstetricians that no woman will be safe in her pregnancy. It is already difficult to attract OBs to Iowa and it will be even more so if they feel that the6 can not offer good care to patients or may be prosecuted for doing so.
07-11-2023
Helena Hadek [Regular cotizen]
CON
We need to keep the government from interfering with a doctors care. Abortion should be accessible anytime, anywhere. What goes on with my body is my business, no one elses.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [Silver]
CON
I disagree with this bill and any similar attempt to take away a womans right to make decisions for themselves.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
I can make my own medical decisions.I don't need government in my personal business.
07-11-2023
07-11-2023
Cindy Opitz []
CON
Please do not support this bill, which takes away my right to self determination. My healthcare decisions are my own and should not be decided by politicians. My body, my choice, my right.
07-11-2023
ellen hansen []
CON
I oppose this bill. Any female needs to be able to make abortion decisions having consulted with her doctor.
07-11-2023
Joseph Messina []
CON
This bill is a grotesque attempt by lawmakers to seriously overstep government authority onto what should be a private matter between doctors and patients.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Abortion is health care. This bill would inflict unnecessary suffering.
07-11-2023
Jason Lang [Citizen of Iowa]
CON
Iowa's race to the bottom continues. My opposition is similar to the many comments you have already heard so I will spare you a long list. Please consider two things: 1. Polls show Iowans don't want this. 2. You are scoring political points with some of the least freedom loving, autocratic individuals crawling around in our political system. Why do you want to be associated with these people? 3. As a taxpayer, I don't want my money going toward the inevitable lawsuit(s) this bill will generate. Please save this money for the living not this continued ridiculous crusade you have to save your tortured souls.
07-11-2023
Diane Berner []
CON
First note that Iowa has the fewest number of OBGYN specialists per capita of any state in the country, according to data from the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology in the state of Iowa. Of the 99 counties in Iowa, 66 currently lack access to OBGYN and birth services. If you want to limit access to safe legal abortion are you also willing to:Increase access to OBGYN services to every county?Protect the right to birth control?Provide birth control to both women and men free of charge?Provide paid parental leave?Provide health care?Provide for quality childcare?Require fathers to pay child support?Unless you are also willing to improve the health and welfare of mothers and babies once they are born this is not about the sanctity of life. It is about punishing and controlling women. Women do not get pregnant by themselves. They should not be the only ones who shoulder all the responsibility. If you truly want fewer abortions, which probably most people would agree with, you need to demand more accountability of men. You need to protect birth control and provide it free of charge. You need to provide care for pregnant and nursing mothers. You need to provide for care of babies after they are born. Instead of spending your time on limiting abortion access, work on limiting the need for abortions in the first place. If women are forced to give birth, men need to be forced to support them. Everyone cares about life, but not everyone has the same religious beliefs, which is what the country was founded on. Vote no on more restrictions to abortion access. Instead, work to add OGGYN services to every county in Iowa and protect access to birth control. Lets protect pregnant women and prevent unwanted pregnancies.Respectfully,Diane Berner
07-11-2023
Carolyn Brown []
CON
Women will die if this bill is passed. The University of Iowa will be handicapped in its mission of training future doctors, since OB/GYN and maternalfetal medicine will not be able to train in necessary procedures.This is in addition to the fact that in no other circumstances may a human being be required to sacrifice her body against her will!
07-11-2023
Melanie Schroeder [Constituent ]
CON
Iowa needs to keep abortion legal and accessible. We need to fund sex education, promote safe sex, and provide free birth control. Family planning resources , treatments and procedures needs to be available and respected. Medical professionals and their patients should be the ones making these very personal decisions. I am Prochild, Pro family and ProChoice! Find the child with public education, access to affordable housing and support for nutrition and medical services!
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Women should have the rights to their own bodies!
07-11-2023
David Dettmann []
CON
We do not support the fetal heartbeat abortion. The six week period is especially offensive as it is not even based on long established science. The concept of life beginning at conception is strictly a belief of some, but not all religions and should not be any basis for laws. Please respect and support women's reproductive rights.
07-11-2023
Jason Danielson [Citizen]
CON
Stop trying to control womens bodies and lives.
07-11-2023
Anonymous []
CON
Too bad not even ONE Republican could vote for the amendment that would have protected young girls from having to carry a pregnancy resulting from rape. This is the heartless face of the Iowa Republican party today. Women and girls deserve better. The proposed law is a farce but women aren't laughing.
07-11-2023
Jodi Stedman [Self ]
CON
I am Against this legislation It is a womans choice The state needs to stay out of personal medical decisions If this was a man that got pregnant this wouldnt be an issue men wouldnt stand for anyone telling them how to manage their health We are going back in time with womens rights what is next our right to vote This is very distressing and will change who wants to move to our state and it could change who comes to the state to study medicine with all these restrictions 60% of the public doesnt agree and we pay your salaries You work for the people not the church or the lobbyists
07-11-2023
Jay Hinkhouse, MD []
CON
If the legislature votes for this and Gov signs it, you are all going AGAINST the wishes of the majority of Iowa. This will happily get many of you VOTED out of office. Maybe that is a good thing. Stop pretending to be doctorsmost of you didn't go to med school
07-11-2023
Judith McClure []
CON
Abuse of power! Just because you've arranged it so you could, doesn't mean you should.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [Hygge Home Essentials]
CON
Fetal heartbeats do not equal life. Cells canebe made to beat in a petri dish. Women, who ARE alive, have family, have a career, will bear the brunt of this horrendous bill by having been denied life saving procedures. You care more about a few cells than a living, breathing human.
07-11-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
The majority of your constituents are NOT for this!
07-11-2023
Anonymous [Mom]
CON
I am adamantly opposed to this bill. I firmly believe women should have the right to make decisions regarding their body without any government interference. This is an extremely personal decision. Women are capable of making their own decision regarding their own body. Leave the government out of this. Support women.
07-11-2023
RICH STOFFERS [RETIRED SCHOOL PERSONNEL ASSOCIATION ]
CON
Leave the reproductive rights to our women, our families and their doctors! Republicans want to take us backwards and continue to take Reproductive Rights away from our women; our families! This is wrong! Urge all legislators to vote "NO" on Abortion Bans in IA.! Absolutely horrible and hateful year the Statehouse! #RepubliCONS #SinisterAttacks #ReproductiveRights4All #FundOurPublicSchools #WorstGovInU.S.ofA.
07-11-2023
Lori Reicks [Concerned Citio]
CON
Abortion a private health matter and should not be governed by the state of Iowa or any other government agency. This a private and difficult decision for a woman, and if appropriate her family and her Dr to assist in making. This bill infringes on a womans right to manage her own health care and her right to all health care options. The heartbeat bill is yet another attack on all low income women as financially secure women will be able to travel to receive their abortions. 70% of Iowa women and 61% of all Iowans believe abortion should be legal in all or most cases. You took an oath to represent all Iowans. Passing this bill may represent/support your own ideologies and the minority but it does not represent the majority.
07-11-2023
Michelle Servadio Elias [Military Veterans Caucus IDP ]
CON
The 9th Amendment of our Federal Constitution gives us every right unenumerated. Unwritten but implied. Right to privacy. Right to birth control. Right for a woman to plan her family. Arrival 6, laws uniform, the state cannot claim a vested interest when the state has no plans to provide for the unborn, support, housing, nutrition, education or healthcare or college education, or the life Liberty or equality for the unborn. There is no plan for clean water, air, or sustainable living past 2030 for the born children. An undue burden is placed on Mothers who give birth. Laws uniform would direct equality under the law, so DNA paternity tests must be law and Fathers must equally financially support every child they create. If they do not the Courts must order Vasectomies for men who do not support their children. Healthcare is a human right. I have Ehlers Danlos In 2019 during a legislative forum I started bleeding heavily and afterwards ended up in ER. My uterus was size of 4 months pregnant. My tubes are tied. Ive had 5 babies and lost 2. My fiance has vasectomy. My hemoglobin dropped to 8 and I needed emergency care. My blood pressure dropped to 70/43. Every one was grabbing at me and I had a severe ptsd military sexual assault flashback. I needed an Emergency D/C and the ICU. I got lucky. I got instant emergency care and my life was saved. I have a condition that can cause instant bleeding. I had to have a hysterectomy 17 days after my husband and I were married. Think of this same situation in todays light. It is my nature inalienable right to seek medical treatment to sustain my life so I may pursue my happiness. I could have died. Please keep the law out of Reproductive medicine. Respectfully,State Chairwoman Veterans Caucus Iowa Democratic PartyFounder Climate Environmental Caucus Iowa Democratic PartyFounder Iowa Hemp Industries Association
07-11-2023
Jan Gallagher [N/A]
CON
Leave women's rights alone.
07-12-2023
Lori Ziegenhorn [American Association of Physician Assistents]
CON
As a health care provider, I have seen the harmful effects to children, women and families who have not had control of their own bodies and health care. This bill will cause illegal abortions, causing deaths to unborn children, women who have infection or death from unsafe procedures and more children with disabilities. There is no follow through for women, children, girls or families for health care, financial assistance for child care to allow parents to work and provide for their enlarged families. The majority of people in IA support abortion. Please listen to the majority of us.Sincerely, Lori ZiegenhornPhysician Assistant
07-12-2023
Miriam Timmer-Hackert []
CON
Why dont we solve the demand for abortion instead of eliminating the supply? We could make sure birth control is easy to access. We could feed hungry children and house homeless children. Instead you are just giving women less right to control their body than a corpse has. Saying a woman has less rights over her womb than she has in the garbage she sets out for collection.
07-12-2023
Jean Hagen []
CON
Even though Iowa Republican legislators and the Republican Governor do not support womens reproductive rights I assume they do support a strong Iowa economy. This fetal cardiac activity bill which greatly limits womens autonomy will damage the economy of Iowa and the economic status of those of us who choose to stay or are unable to leave the state. Young people and women of reproductive age, in addition to trans people and families with trans children who have already begun moving out of Iowa, will have more reasons to leave or refuse to move into Iowa, exacerbating the brain drain of Iowa. Some people will choose to boycott our state and some corporations will choose not to locate here and some organizations will decline to hold meetings or conventions here if this anti choice and anti woman bill passes. Not to mention that Republicans who vote for abortion restrictions may get voted out of office by the prochoice majority in Iowa.
Attachment
07-14-2023
Andra DiMarco [Self]
CON
This is not what the majority of Iowans want. And it is not in the best interest of human health.
07-16-2023
Logan Schroeder []
CON
This bill is not what is best for Iowa. Maternal care in rural Iowa is incredibly strained. This bill will actively drive future physicians and OBGYNs, like myself, out of the state. Iowans know what is best for their reproductive care.
07-17-2023
Thomas Moberg []
CON
This proposal is a tragedy for human rights and religious freedoms. There is no argument for limiting abortion that is not rooted in a conservative Christian worldview, and to codify that worldview into law is a form of theocratic fascism. This decision will not eliminate abortion, it will only subject pregnant people to the violence of the state, leaving those who cannot afford the short term cost of traveling out of state with two choices: face a lifetime of poverty from an unplanned pregnancy, or risk their lives by trying to end the pregnancy themselves. The legislators who vote for this bill will be directly responsible for the impoverishment and death of those people. The movement to end abortion is not about safeguarding children, and it never has been; it is a bad faith moral panic that conservatives manufactured in order to take political power by exploiting the evangelical christian voting block. The people bringing this bill forward are the same people who signed Iowas first child labor law into effect earlier this year. Theyre the same people who fought against the child tax credit, who do not believe in universal preK, universal healthcare, or adequately financing public education, and who will not even ATTEMPT to address school shootings. They will not address the insane wealth gap and the oppressive labor tactics that siphon money from working class families and feed it to the rich. They will not address the planetary crisis of climate change, which raises ethical questions about bringing a new life into a world that is destined for ruin. We must reject the conservative framing of abortion, and instead force this question: What have these legislators actually done to create a world worth raising a child in?Vote them out.
07-17-2023
Sandy Lewis [Unity point health]
CON
If this passes and we lose the right to control our bodies with the assistance of our health care providers, not only will women suffer but health care providers will leave Iowa. We will become a state with so few obstetricians that no woman will be safe in her pregnancy. It is already difficult to attract OBs to Iowa and it will be even more so if they feel that the6 can not offer good care to patients or may be prosecuted for doing so.
07-25-2023
Anonymous [N/A]
CON
Its okay for you to disagree with getting an abortion just like its okay for me to agree with getting an abortion. In this country, we can make our own choices and to take away the choice of an abortion from a woman cannot be tolerated. If you dont believe in abortions then dont get one. Thats your choice. We are hurting those people with uteruses and babies further if we ban abortions.
07-30-2023
Denise Kleppe []
CON
I do not support restricting abortion access