Meeting Public Comments

Subcommittee meeting and times are as follows:
A bill for an act relating to school security, including by requiring certain school districts to employ or retain school security personnel, establishing the school security personnel grant program within the department of education, and authorizing school employees to be issued professional permits to carry weapons.(See HF 2586.)
Subcommittee members: Thompson, P.-CH, Wessel-Kroeschell, Wheeler
Date: Monday, February 12, 2024
Time: 12:30 PM - 1:00 PM
Location: RM 19
Names and comments are public records. Remaining information is considered a confidential record.
Comments Submitted:

02-08-2024
John McLaughlin [Iowa Firearms Coalition]
Attachment
02-09-2024
Sandy Wilson [Citizen Engagement ]
Citizen Engagement declares IN FAVOR of HSB 675. Please advance the bill.
02-09-2024
Kevin Hendress []
I support the intent of this bill, with some adjustments. We need to make it so that in ANY school staff is allowed to carry after they go through a training program. We all know good guys stop threats.
02-09-2024
Bernie Scolaro [Retired school counselor/former SCEA president/former SCCSD School Board member]
see attached
Attachment
02-09-2024
john mclaughlin [IFC]
Active Shooter researcher Ed Monk has spent 16 years studying this issue. I have included four slides from his presentation to schools. Please make sure every concerned party is aware of actual facts in this information based on nearly forty years of failure in our schools. Time and Math do not lie. Beliefs and emotions can lead us to arrive at conclusions that cost lives.
Attachment
02-09-2024
Eric Jennings []
I am opposed to this bill. Schools do not need more firearms they need parents who care for and are actively involved in the lives of children and teachers who can focus on teaching those children. Please vote no on moving this forward.
02-11-2024
Dillon Daughenbaugh []
School staff are more than capable of being trained and armed efficiently enough to effectively stop a threat. Staff care about students and often sacrifice themselves to protect student. The Perry Principal is an example. He would still be alive if the insurance companies wouldn't hold children hostage, and he were carrying. We don't need and can't afford SROs in every school. We can arm 5+ staff in every school without hardly increasing budget. The law already allows staff to be armed. Put a cap on the insurance companies.
02-12-2024
Aaron Heal []
Arm the willing staff
02-12-2024
James Vanveldhuizen []
I support this bill, however there needs to be a change to address training. Anyone carrying in school needs to attend a yearly training course including a qualification. Staff should then be required to take more advanced training on a yearly basis including a qualification to continue growing their skill and adopt any new methods that have been developed. Proficient staff carrying will be successful if training is applied and everyone is held to a high standard.
02-12-2024
Andrew Ter Haar []
As a parent with multiple children in school, I support this bill and the further discussion of arming willing and able school employees. As a parent, we already entrust the school district with our most valuable asset, our children. Why we would not take every measure to ensure their safety?
02-12-2024
Miles Murphy []
Pressuring insurance companies to stop prohibiting lawful behavior in our schools by allowing staff to go armed is paramount. We in Iowa have made it clear, going armed as an individual is a key component to the personal safety of ourselves and those we defend. Schools struggle today to balance budgets, prioritize spending, and provide all the necessary services to the community; adding an additional expense of SROs to the school staff isn't the right option here. SROs are great, but can't be everywhere all at once. By allowing willing and trained members of the school staff to go armed is the only way to stop a lethal threat as quickly as possible. We should take this further and pass legislation to prohibit insurance companies from providing policies in the State of Iowa if they do not allow schools to leverage the capabilities allowed to them by law for securing their campus.
02-12-2024
Jacob Clark []
I am opposed to this bill as it currently stands. Elementary, middle schools, and high schools have all been targets of an evil individual wishing to cause harm to as many people as possible. Only having an SRO in the buildings where 9th12th grade students attend leaves the other schools unprotected. It is of common knowledge that all through the country, departments are having a hard time with hiring qualified officers. I don't see how it will be possible to fill all of the new SRO positions that will be created. I would like to see the problems with insurance companies dropping public schools who want/have trained and armed staff addressed as it has been proven in the studies posted above, that only having an SRO is a recipe for failure.
02-12-2024
Matt Zurmuehlen [Private Citizen]
As a parent of public education students and spouse of an educator this bill is one that is long overdue in Iowa. I have approached, in the past, the school boards of my children's school and the districts my wife has taught at to discuss what the school, parents, and others can do to improve school security. In my research, while there are many tools and practices that can be implemented to increase the security of our educational facilities and decrease the efforts of an active shooter the one tool that is most affordable and effective is arming "willing" school staff. As the research performed by Ed Monk shows, and that common sense would tell us, the sooner an active threat can be stopped the better the outcome. As the old adage goes "when seconds count the police are minutes away". What better way to cut down on the time a killer is allowed to commit there crime than by having someone already on scene, who knows the building, has a vested relationship with those in the building, and can act in seconds. While not having active shooters in schools would be ideal we must face the truth that evil can and will find a way and we must be prepared to face that evil when, not if, the time comes. I would like to see this legislation apply to anyone in a school building with any sort of educator license issued by the state not just that districts staff.I know Iowa Firearms Coalition is already taking a proactive approach to staff training and making Iowa schools safer by working with lawmakers. I hope Iowa legislators will lean on their advice and expertise and work together to make safer schools in Iowa a reality as well as an example to other states looking to do the same.
02-12-2024
Gabe Lanz [Black Flag Arsenal]
We fully support arming ANY staff in a school willing to protect others. Having multiple armed, trained, and capable people on scene is the best way to deter a shooter, the fastest way to end one and preserve as much life as possible.
02-12-2024
Dan Tinklenberg []
As a teacher and parent I strongly support this bill. We must provide the best security for our students. In the unfortunate event of a school shooter we send dozens of officers in response. Yet we leave the school unprotected at all other times. It only makes sense to train and arm multiple individuals within the building to eliminate the response time.
02-12-2024
Jessica Bucklin []
I support this bill as both an educator and a parent. If our politicians, celebrities, and even arrested offenders can be protected by trained individuals who carry a firearm, why cant our most precious asset, our kids, be protected like that too. Just knowing theres someone to stop a threat like a gun can be enough deterrent it wont happen. I use to work in law enforcement, I would gladly go through the training again to carry and ensure the safety of my students and kids. Not every teacher has to carry, but allow those that want to the chance. Obviously would need trained and safety steps taken for this. Or even allow a budget for schools to have more than 1 SRO on. Lets be real, having one officer is great, but all kids, including the threat, know who this is and there they are in the school.
02-12-2024
Sandi Winton []
I support this bill. If you want to keep injury and death to adults and children to as few as possible, the response MUST be 30 seconds or less. If you wait for the police to respond, the count will be so much higher. That's not a republican vs democrat talking point, it's just a fact. If your child or grandchild happens to be in the school that is the next target, do you want the bad guy stopped sooner or later? You want common sense gun laws? Well this is it. Please vote to pass this bill. Our children lives are depending on some common sense.
02-12-2024
David C []
As a school staff member I'd be willing if allowed to carry a firearm on school grounds and take a training program as outlined to allow me to do so. As much as I'd like to see Resource Officers in schools, that's pretty costly and wouldn't really have the best coverage as having willing staff armed in the building.
02-12-2024
Aneitah Garmann []
I think this is a nobrainer. If a shooter knows that schools are no longer gunfree zones, they will think twice about walking into a potential gun fight. Arm the willing staff that want to get trained!!
02-12-2024
Mark Enderson []
This bill is long overdue. Our most precious resource is our children, they are our future. We protect our money with layers of security why not the children? They can't learn if they have to always be looking over their shoulder. Mental health, counseling, bullying, and warning signs are all part of the network of security. Shooters never shoot up police stations. Please lock down the schools with armed personnel.
02-12-2024
Sam Schieuer [Schiwerks]
In favor of this bill. Sick and tired of seeing our politicians and banks protected by firearms, but we insist on protecting our children with words. Trained and equipped teachers and administrators, who actually care about our children, are the best option to stop evil people from committing violence on our most vulnerable citizens.
02-12-2024
Michael Ware [Iowa Firearms Coalition]
Evil takes no time off. The ONLY way you stop evil is by being present, willing, and capable. Schools are "gun free zones" and insurance companies restrict the basic human right to selfdefense.When you remove the right to selfdefense, evil acts are unrestricted. So, the innocent become victims. The question becomes how long it'll take for a good guy to eventually show up. Iowa's plan, today, is to make phone calls and wait for people whose rights HAVEN'T been restricted to show up and stop a killer. Good citizens carry responsibly everywhere else in the state with the intended results. They curtail crime and save lives. Why are the lives of our children worth less in Iowa schools? There is an obvious response to this. Let's do it.
02-12-2024
teri patrick []
I support HSB675. School safety is a top priority and our children should be protected and have people on site to protect school security and/or individuals who have been trained. I would also recommend all who want to understand more about school safety in schools and policies in schools read the book 'Why Meadow Died" by Andrew Pollack and Max Eden.