Meeting Public Comments

Subcommittee meeting and times are as follows:
A bill for an act relating to education, including modifying provisions related to open enrollment, teacher librarian endorsements, and the placement of children identified as requiring special education in competent private instruction.(See HF 2498.)
Subcommittee members: Brink-CH, Bossman, Cahill
Date: Wednesday, February 16, 2022
Time: 5:00 PM - 5:30 PM
Location: House Lounge
Names and comments are public records. Remaining information is considered a confidential record.
Comments Submitted:

02-15-2022
Chelsea Sims []
As a teacher librarian, I can tell you that the graduate level work and degree I earned at UNI are ESSENTIAL to the successful execution of my job. Being a librarian is a complex, unique position in a school that requires a myriad of specialized training. The goal of reducing budgets for rural schools by not employing a qualified Teacher Librarian would be a poor one that can better be achieved in other ways. A qualified Teacher Librarian, in fact, is one of the best money saving positions a school could hire as they serve so many roles in the building with just one salary. We are teachers, offering prep time for classroom teachers. We are collaborative partners, helping classroom teachers connect their lessons to new and high quality literature and the best, most ageappropriate and vetted information available. We are leaders, serving on many committees in our school communities, as we have a unique perspective of the entire school building much like an administrator. And... we are professionals at collecting amazing information and literature for our students at just the right age level, interest level, and curricular need all in a welcoming and safe environment that is key to school culture. The extra money a masters degree for one person costs a district is WELL worth it for the students, as decades of school achievement research studies can show you.I also recognize that a secondary motive in this bill likely exists to remove the people best trained to fight against attacks on intellectual freedom. If we are not trained, we cannot stand up against censors. The current culture wars are proof that welltrained, qualified teacher librarians are necessary to keep our democracy strong.Additionally, alternative paths to being certified as a Teacher Librarian already exist. Removing the requirement altogether is a blatant attempt to deprofessionalize our work.
02-15-2022
John McWilliams []
I second the comments of Ms. Sims! A school librarian does so much more than story circle with the little ones and book checkout. Part of a school librarians job is to teach research skills, which makes it possible to synthesize information and determine if information is credible, including on the internet. Qualified school librarians at every school in Iowa will lead to a more educated population! The Iowa House needs to put every effort into removing obstacles for Iowas public schools. Lack of funding and bills like this do the opposite.Thank you,John McWilliams
02-15-2022
Jonathan Sims []
I oppose this bill. Qualified teacher librarians are an essential part of our public education system. There is no reason to take that valuable asset away from Iowan children. Iowa used to be famous for its exceptional public education system. Stop passing legislation that would make it worse.
02-15-2022
Joan Bessman Taylor [Library educator, parent of 3 schoolage children]
I spent eight years in education for becoming a librarian and then the last 22 years educating others for the profession of librarianship. Prior to my work with libraries, I was a 612 language arts teacher in a rural district. I oppose the addition of the language presented as Division III lines 2728 stating that the position of a teacher librarian shall not require a master's degree. The masters degree is appropriate for the K12 endorsement and should remain an option for those wanting to be or employ a highlyqualified librarian. Currently there are multiple paths for becoming a teacher librarian in Iowa, and the masters degree is part of only one of those paths. Districts seeking highquality educators who serve as educational leaders should be permitted to require the education needed for that leadership. Teaching K12 does require additional specialized knowledge beyond that of teaching solely at the elementary or secondary level. Teacher librarians gain this additional competence through masters training: (1) teaching the full K12 grade span requires additional knowledge of content area curriculum in order to collaborate with teachers across levels, buildings and disciplines; (2) the K12 span also requires additional knowledge of childrens and adolescent development and the literature appropriate for those stages of development; and (3) the responsibility of teaching students throughout their k12 career requires additional knowledge of educational research in order to continuously improve the design and implementation of a comprehensive sequential School Library program as defined in Iowa Administrative Code 281 12.2 (256). In the same way that K12 Reading specialists and school counselors, other areas that are permitted to require a masters degree, serve across the school and across constituencies, K12 teacher librarians are leaders in their districts who serve on committees and perform duties beyond those required of their classroom peers. They deserve full preparation to deliver the program their students and families need. Libraryspecificcredentialing and the professionals who lead K12 library programs are vital to the success of schools in Iowa.
02-16-2022
Karla Krueger []
Division III lines 2728 of this study bill is deeply concerning. I ask that the committee remove the language that says, "Such license shall not require the completion of a master's degree." We do not want that wording. (1) It is overreaching. Other teaching endorsements for elementary education, physical education, special education, etc. do not have language in the code to prohibit a professional degree. Having such a statement seems confusing and could give the appearance that there is some sort of target on one group of teachers teacher librarians. It is unnecessary and unIowan to pick out one strand of teachers in this way. (2) It's a moot point. There are already several well defined paths to endorsement in chapter 282 of the Iowa Educational Examiners, one of which is the master's degree option; and it is highly valued and serves the needs of Iowa's students. Additionally there is no shortage of graduates annually for secure positions. Districts having highly qualified teacher librarians seem to attract new teachers, when needed, who are eager to be teacher librarians in these innovative school library programs. (3) Teacher librarians' roles, whether in elementary, middle, and/or high schools are huge, and they are in direct instruction with students for the entire school day in most buildings. In the past, some old school thought was that the job was all about checking books in and out. But as we see in public and school libraries, this process is often automated. What teacher librarians actually do is to ensure students are enabled to develop a love of reading and improve literacy through curating impressive collections that meet the needs of all students and their many reading levels. Teacher librarians also teach essential technology skills. And they teach dozens of standards for information literacy. This is just one example: "Teach students to conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a selfgenerated question) or solve a problem, narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate, synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation." All of this teaching across the range of K12 grade levels is a high value for districts who hire a highly qualified teacher librarian, and their students will continue to soar. Thank you for working on this issue.
02-16-2022
Allison Pease [School]
I took a few years off of teaching to be home with my kids. When I returned, I applied for the librarian position. I had my reading endorsement and a masters degree in educational technology. I figured I might have to take a class or two, but would otherwise have the credentials. I was not pleased to learn that I needed 30 hours of coursework to be certified. However, it was NEEDED! I didnt know what I didnt know. The work of a librarian is different than any other role in schools. My coursework was necessary for me to do my job well. Matter of fact, I wish there were more follow up classes I could take. Selecting materials, coteaching, guiding library paraprofessionals, and guidance teaching library classes are all part of the coursework. Im thankful the requirements were there. It prepared me to be able to do my job well. One of the hardest parts of our job is being the only one in our district doing what we do. Im thankful Im in a district that supports teacher librarians. There is one teacher librarian 512 and one for K4. Even so, our jobs are very different from each other.
02-16-2022
Jen Panther []
My name is Jen Panther and I am from North Liberty. I am concerned with the wording in this bill. As a Teacher Librarian it is important that the Librarian be a TRAINED professional. What is your intention in removing the Masters requirement. If it is to make the path for a LICENSED teacher to qualify to become a TL, then I am more likely to support this bill. But in this time of discourse with books and the push for transparency of materials in a school, if your intent is to allow districts to add a para into the mix with ABSOLUTELY NO EXPERIENCE, that is a mistake. We are trained to evaluate materials through a critical lense..adding someone who likes to read is just like sending a kid into a bookstore and letting them pick all of the books with a pretty cover. You need the critical eye of a trained professional. We are also more than just books..seriously, do you even have ANY IDEA of what we do, what any teacher does. I strongly encourage you to come and visit your schools libraries..ones that are staffed correctly of course.
02-16-2022
Tonia Sandersfeld-Miller []
I oppose this bill. As a certified teacher librarian, I can assure you that I needed the courses taken to achieve my master's degree. I was a 7th grade ELA teacher for 11 years, and I especially needed the courses on research and databases to be able to do my job as a teacher librarian well. Teachers in my building rely on me to be the expert on research skills and to help coteach students about databases and research skills. Many of my master's classmates expressed during our research classes that they did not have this knowledge prior to taking this class. It is also especially important to have highly qualified and trained teacher librarians making book purchases for their schools. Finding books that are appropriate for students' reading levels and interests is a specialized skill that the UNI school library program taught me. I'm able to purchase materials specific to my students' needs, and not rely on subscription services who would send me books that might or might not fit my students' needs. I feel that every school would benefit from having a full time, highly qualified teacher librarian in their school. To remove this requirement would be removing an expert in research skills from our schools, to the detriment of our teachers and students.
02-16-2022
Kim Carlson []
I too echo the sentiments of Ms. Sims. Being a librarian is more than just reading stories at story time. Though that is an important part too. We are the heart of the school. Librarians are asked to adapt to every subject taught in our buildings. We help teachers and students find appropriate resources beyond Google, how to extract that information from those resources without plagiarizing and how to cite those sources accordingly. In todays world of misinformation these skills are more important than ever. I wear many hats in my role as 512 librarian: teacher, researcher, technology person, listener, the list goes on. My courses at UNI taught me how to evaluate resources to find the best match to our school and our students and our curriculum. Lets talk about state testing. Taking away the requirement would mean lowering a schools reading scores. Research has shown time and time again that having a qualified (Masters degree) librarian boosts your reading scores. What school wouldnt want higher reading scores. I dont understand how lowering the standards for librarians is going to make a school better. Would you lower the standards for your doctor? Or even your mechanic? No. So why is it OK to lower the standards for our students. Why would you cheat them out of a high quality education? Invest in our students, invest in education, invest in Iowas future.
02-16-2022
Suzette Kragenbrink [Mount Vernon Community Schools]
I have been a Teacher Librarian for the past 28 years. A teacher librarian is not the job of stamping and shelving books or telling students to be quiet as they enter a space. One of our biggest issues my profession deals with is our identity in a school and the contribution a TL can offer to a school system. A TL in 2022 is not the individual you remember from your education. Even over the past 28 years I have adjusted to the needs of my district, teachers and students. I am the person that chose to add digital citizenship to the curriculum that I teach. Recognizing the challenges that phones and other technology have added to a student's life. I am the one that continues to research the information literacy skills that students should use in the classroom in seeking information and in their personal lives when simply listening/reading the news. I am the professional that models technology and helps teachers integrate technology into their instruction and student's projects. I am the professional that uses our district's selection policy (which I also updated) to purchase books and then weeds the collection to keep it relevant. As an education major, I wouldn't have had any experience/exposure during my undergrad education. I am all of these things because of my educational background a Masters from the University of Iowa in Library Science. There are many ways to attain a masters; virtual or in person learning. There are also far more locations than just the two brick and mortar systems in the state of Iowa. When I have talked to fellow teachers about considering getting a masters to be a Teacher Librarian their biggest concern is how often the legislature changes the guidelines that districts have to follow with regard to having a TL on staff. Their concern of taking a job and then the district being able to release them because they can share with a neighboring district and save money. We need to make these positions secure so a 20 something will get their masters and be the professional to provide all of the above. That security starts with proper state funding and keeping guidelines that clearly require a district to have a teacher librarian on staff.
02-16-2022
Chelsey Kolpin []
I am currently working as a 512 teacher librarian and have done so for the past ten years. When I became a librarian, I had a 512 English education degree, a reading endorsement, and a year of my masters level library classes. I still felt unprepared and the learning curve was steepthose masters level classes are essential to doing the job of teacher librarian. As all other comments have stated, there is so much more that goes into being a teacher librarian than reading and selecting books and taking care of the collection. Teacher librarians are leaders and teachers of research and inquiry, news and information literacy, digital citizenship, technology integration, and, of course, literature and reading. I find the timing of this house file interesting, given that the governor and those in various positions in our state government have spent the last year attacking teacher librarians for their selection of materials. I would think those actions would lead to a call for MORE training for teacher librarians, not less. Please continue to require this vital training for our states teacher librarians.
02-16-2022
Jocelyn Krueger []
As a parent of four kids, I want to make sure that those educators teaching and taking care of my children in school while I am at work are the most qualified to understand the topics and issues surrounding the education of my children and their classmates. That understanding comes from training in programs such as masters of library science. Lowering standards does not make Iowa schools the best in the country. Instead of eliminating a necessary requirement, help those honored members of our community who become librarians and teachers find training placement and help them to complete their degrees. Maybe let people work while they are earning their graduate degrees, but make enrollment a requirement. I oppose this proposed legislative change.
02-16-2022
Dixie Forcht []
As a licensed, certified K12 Teacher Librarian I oppose the proposed change to the requirements for Teacher Librarians in Iowa. I was a high school teacher for 12 years prior to earning my Master's in School Library Studies from UNI. I can attest that the coursework required is absolutely necessary for providing appropriate services for the students and staff members in the two libraries I manage. I fail to see the advantage of decreasing the requirements for licensure. The role of the Teacher Librarian in supporting literacy across the curriculum, building a robust collection of materials to support learning, collaborating with teachers and administrators to design and enact rigorous learning experiences for all stakeholders, and teaching students to think critically and independently to construct new understanding and insights from a variety of information sources in our rapidly evolving world is essential in maintaining the quality of Iowa's schools. Teacher Librarians uniquely benefit from first being classroom teachers before earning the Master's as it enables us to appreciate the perspectives of our colleagues as they work with students as well as implementing the best strategies for meeting the needs of all stakeholders when it comes to collection development in conjunction with technology access and integration. Teacher Librarians are vital to elevating the learning experience for every individual in the school community. I urge you to oppose this change.
02-16-2022
Katy Kauffman []
Im registering my opposition to this bill. I entered the field of school librarianship after 27 years as a high school English teacher, I thought the transition would be an easy one, and one where I was questioning why I should seek further education, let alone a masters. As I progressed throughout the Masters program and began working as a teacher librarian, I became painfully aware of how little I knew about the impact and the responsibilities a schoolteacher librarian has in the learning community. The teacher librarian wears so many hats: reading advocate, technology integrationist, techsupport, coteacher, instructor, manager of school resources, procurer of reading materials, and manager of an extensive library program. Furthermore, A review of the research indicates that one of the greatest successes for students in reading is having a certified teacher librarian in the building. Removing the current requirements for teacher librarianship will not only be detrimental to the school library program, but the entirety of the school as a whole. Please strike this portion of HSB 705.
02-16-2022
Jennifer Wirtz []
Removing the requirement for a masters degree for school librarians is dumbing down our society. We need trained professionals with a masters that specifically targets information literacy, especially in this digital age and wave of fake news and alternate facts. At a time when there is great concern for what books are available in schools, why would we want less trained and unprepared people making the buying decisions for our K12 schools?Instead lets offer an incentive or pay teachers to get a masters in library science so more qualified people are available for those specialized jobs.
02-16-2022
Marta Ferguson [Writer, editor, book reviewer and patent of public-school senior]
I oppose the language being added to Division III. There are multiple paths to librarianship in Iowas schools and the path requiring a masters is just one of them and is for those working in the full k12 context. Removing the masters is the first step to doing away with libraryspecific credentialing all together. I believe every district deserves a fully trained librarian especially given the expanding world of information and need to teach digital citizenship.
02-16-2022
Moria Brown [Retired]
I am opposed to this bill reducing the credentials of school librarians. After reading through other responses in agreement with me, I cannot say it anymore eloquently than they have already done. Maintaining qualified staff is the future of our public schools. Thank you.
02-16-2022
Jan Smith []
At a time when books are being challenged and parents are upset about content, students and districts need a licensed professional to lead their libraries more than ever. Why would we want someone with less education to make book selections? Why would we want someone with less education to teach students research skills, digital citizenship skills, and the love of reading? A good teacher librarian teaches, administers a sizable library budget, collaborates with colleagues, and serves as the information specialist for the entire school community. The specialized knowledge learned in graduate school assures that these responsibilities are managed with the utmost respect and care. I am opposed to HSB 705. Please leave the Masters credential in place.
02-16-2022
Corissa Thompson []
I am a librarian serving 10 buildings in my district at the elementary level. The knowledge it takes to correctly analyze, maintain, and curate multiple library collections to provide adequate access for the variety needs of our children is quite immense. Now consider a librarian who is making these decisions k12? It is not a simple task, and it is not one I perfected in undergrad. Someone with a Master's Degree who has taken graduate level courses and understands the type of research and involvement to do it right is necessary. This Bill should not even be happening. Do you plan to go to a cardiologist who has not done extensive work and education in the area. It is a specialty, and an important specialty. I have been responsible for just one library, and I have been responsible for 10. The more you cover, the more you need to know. In Iowa, we have small districts skirting around paying certified librarians and therefore are only employing the one required certified librarian. Some of these librarians cover more than one district. The problem isn't finding librarians with the proper degree, the problem is not funding schools to be able to do so. The problem is not requiring every building to have their own certified librarian. Please create bills for that require funding and library certification. If one person can focus on a small area, then perhaps you don't need to require the k12 masters, but when you have one person covering k12 of multiple district, that requires an extra skill set and knowledge that only a mastered librarian could handle. Please turn down this bill and create one that is more useful
02-16-2022
Jen Dovre []
I am opposed to the change in this bill that is aimed at reducing the credentials of teacher librarians. I agree with many others who have commented about the value of the coursework and the necessity for someone in the specialized position of teacher librarian to be equipped with the knowledge and resources for the job. It does not serve our students well to place underqualified people in this position, and I believe the proposed change in the language will lead to just that. Please spend time learning about the unique role of the teacher librarian (previous comments provide ample examples), so you might understand why the current requirements are necessary and should not be changed. Thank you.
02-16-2022
Lisa Petrie []
It's disingenuous to suggest that the reason for removing the requirement for a Masterscredentialed Teacher Librarian is the "exorbitant" expense. If small, rural school districts can't afford to hire a highlyqualified Teacher Librarian, then fund our schools. You have that power. Every public school student in our state deserves access to a library professional who brings incredible bang for our taxpayer buck. Teacher Librarians are certified teachers. We understand and write policy that impacts our entire district. We are valued members of building leadership teams. We collaborate with classroom teachers to design lessons that encourage critical thinking. We understand the importance of consulting professional review sources in order to select books that are engaging, relevant, and ageappropriate. We teach students how to evaluate information and wade through the massive amount of mis/disinformation that threaten our personal lives, and our democracy. We implement new technologies. We nurture and encourage a love of reading. We welcome *every* student into our spaces.I am OPPOSED to HSB 705. Maintain the requirement for a Master's degree.
02-16-2022
Amanda Boody []
Bills like this are further deteriorating Iowa's hard won reputation of educational excellence. Instead of building on the tradition of excellence that Iowans want, bills like this gut those traditions. Selling the hard work of generations for a transient illusion of political gain. Every school in Iowa should have a fully trained librarian. It is such a basic and minimal expectation I can only assume that those who are working to degrade the standards don't understand what librarians actually do, what the standards are, or why prudent, thoughtful parents, teachers, librarians and lawmakers of the past understood the value and required them.What is the end game here? How is this building on the successes of the past? What is the road to every child in Iowa getting world class education? It is easy to destroy and hard to build. No one trying to build Iowa for the future would degrade requirements that are necessary as a baseline in today's school, let alone an education system that pretends to be more than minimal. Quit being lazy and destroying for political effect. It will not go well in the future. It will not attract new families to the state, or new businesses. Iowa will stagnate and bills like this are to blame.
02-16-2022
William Brown []
I am opposed to this legislation. Our schools used to be the best in the nation. Removing qualifications from our educators degrades the education our students receive. Separating special education students from the general population of students does more harm than good. I speak from experience as a parent and grandparent of special needs children. I agree with comments made by others opposing this bill.
02-16-2022
Anne Coatar [Teacher Librarian]
Dear Legislators,My name is Anne Coatar and I am a Teacher Librarian in Iowa. The current school year is my 8th year as a teacher. I received my Masters degree in 2019 in School Library Studies from the University of Northern Iowa. I am opposed to HSB 705. The specialized training I received during my studies provided me with the skills necessary to best serve students as a Teacher Librarian. In my position as Teacher Librarian, I select books for the diverse collection we own and spend hours each day working with students to get the right book at the right time into their hands. My training prepared me to deliver skilled instruction in information literacy, technology skills, and literacy. I have a deep understanding of the curriculum and collaborate with teachers to plan and execute lessons to meet the Iowa Core Standards. My Masters degree separates me from my colleagues who chose to pursue the endorsement by only 3 semester hours of study. The only difference is that I completed a graduate thesis research project, and they did not. My graduate thesis explored student learning in a novel unit during the pandemic, all completed during remote learning. Nothing could have prepared me more for the challenges of the past two years than my Master's training at UNI. I do not support the Governors language in SSB 3080 to eliminate the requirement for the Masters Degree. In fact, loopholes already exist in the state to hire librarians without a Masters for positions that should require the degree. This leads me to believe the real intent of the bill is to gradually eliminate the position of Teacher Librarian in our Iowa public schools altogether. I believe the evidence supports me when I state the Governor would like to eliminate Teacher Librarians and replace us with paraeducators and secretaries. Paraeducators and secretaries play a crucial role in the school community, but they do not have the specialized training and experience of a librarian with or without a master's degree. I have deep admiration and respect for my colleagues with and without a Masters degree. We all have the specialized training necessary to carry out the four roles of librarianship. The training needed to get the right books at the right time into young scholars' hands. The problem solving, and communication skills to help families with tech support over the phone during the pandemic. The information literacy skills to teach critical thinking and reading to our students. The understanding of curriculum and how and when to supplement it for our students, and support our teachers. As well as equipt to make informed decisions about what books get into the hands of our young people. In closing, the elimination of a professional degree is an assault on our profession. It devalues librarianship and puts our students, and community at a great disadvantage. Please vote against HSB 705, and leave the language as it currently reads in the Iowa Code. HSB 705 will set a precedent to remove a highly skilled educator from our public schools. Anne Coatar
02-16-2022
Diane Brown [Diane Brown]
I am opposed to the language in HSB 705 reducing the required endorsements for school teacherlibrarians. Keep the existing legislation intact in Iowa Code Section 256.11, subsection 9. Professional education for teacherlibrarians is important and necessary for endorsement, however, the endorsement does not require a masters degree. As an endorsed teacherlibrarian, I know that the professional coursework that teacherlibrarians undertake allows them to fully understand the complexities of library operation, effectively teach K12 students, and simultaneously manage libraries within school settings. What is critically important for all of our schools and students is that the staffing of endorsed teacherlibrarians has a documented direct and positive impact on the achievement of Iowas students. Keep the current law for endorsement. Link to School Libraries Impact Studies https://www.lrs.org/datatools/schoollibraries/impactstudies/
02-16-2022
Abby Mussmann []
I simply cannot wrap my brain around the idea that a successful library program could possibly be led effectively by an under qualified individual. Studies show time and time again that robust library programs have amazing impacts on student learning, and yet we want our children to go without? As we approach troubling times in curriculum development and book challenges, how can a librarian stand for our underrepresented populations without the proper classes and training? Our children deserve more than what we are proposing for them.
02-16-2022
Michelle Morey [Iowa City Community School District]
I am opposed to HSB 705. I will not go on at length, as others here have summed up everything I wanted to say nicely. I will just say that there is no practical reason for this bill whatsoever. So why introduce it? It's a waste of time unless the agenda is actually to weaken libraries, schools, information literacy, and free access to information in Iowa.
02-16-2022
Denise Rehmke []
I oppose the legislation proposed in HSB 705 removing the requirement for a Masters degree from the Teacher Librarian endorsement. Professional librarian preparation programs, such as those from the University of Iowa and UNI, each provide the coursework and supervised clinical experiences that are necessary to produce a fully trained, professional librarian, equipped to manage both the teaching/learning role as well as the library administration role inherent in the position. To presume that someone without this specialized education and training could successfully manage a school library program is shortsighted and indicates a narrow, misguided view of what highly qualified Teacher Librarians bring to the educational program of the school.
02-16-2022
Claire Matthews []
I oppose HSB 705. I strongly oppose losing the requirement for special certification for Teacher Librarians in Iowa. This was offered as an option to save money in smaller school districts, but it is in actuality an attack on student success in Iowa.There are already paths other than a Master's degree that allow for certified Teacher Librarians in school districts. It takes specialized training to best prepare a huge variety of learners to be critical thinkers of not only reading books, but of the information they access online every day. Especially after Covid, students consume more digital information than ever before. Certified Teacher Librarians create curriculum to help students navigate between good and potentially harmful information, in print and online.Study after study shows that having a qualified, trained Teacher Librarian in schools increases student achievement. Iowan student achievement has been decreasing for years. Removing the certification requirements for Teacher Librarians hurts students and further degrades Iowa's reputation for excellent education. Please oppose House Study Bill 705.
02-16-2022
Katherine Bryden []
I am a parent of two school age children who attend public school in Iowa. I oppose HSB 705, which would decrease the educational standard for school librarians. The school librarian role requires training in K12 pedagogical standards, curriculum design, information technology, and research methods and database use, and the people who fill that job role do need specialized training to assist both students and teachers with accessing and utilizing library resources. We should maintain the requirement for extra Masters level training for the people who are employed in this very important role in the public school system.
02-16-2022
Tom Honz []
Please do not allow the bill striking the requirement for a certified librarian with a masters degree to move forward or be passed. Thank you,Tom Honz