Meeting Public Comments

Subcommittee meeting and times are as follows:

A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Iowa relating to the right of the people to keep and bear arms.(See HJR 4.)

Subcommittee members: Holt-CH, Klein, Wessel-Kroeschell

Date: Tuesday, January 19, 2021

Time: 9:30 AM - 10:00 AM

Location: Law Library

Names and comments are public records. Remaining information is considered a confidential record.

Comments Submitted:

Download Comments

01-15-2021

Lenore Holte []

I am an Iowa wife, mother and grandmother. I am writing to express my opposition to the proposed strict scrutiny amendment to the Iowa constitution. This dangerous step would lead courts to strike down the few public safety guarantees Iowa currently has against gun violence. It could put too many guns in the hands of dangerous people in our state. In addition, this is not even what Iowans want! Twothirds of Iowans oppose amending the constitution to undermine gun safety laws, according to polling data from 2020. Given the events of last week, we need our lawmakers to make us safer, not less safe. Do the right thing and stop this radical and dangerous amendment.

01-15-2021

Leslie Carpenter [Iowa Mental Health Advocacy]

My name is Leslie Carpenter and I am the mom of an adult son who lives with a Schizoaffective Disorder, which is a difficult to treat combination of Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder. When his illness is worse at times, the voices he hears often tell him to do horrible things. At other times, they tell him to kill himself. The last thing I would ever want is for him to have a gun while his illness is out of control. For this reason, I am adamantly opposed to this bill which would prevent future legislation that would limit his ability to get a gun via sensible gun legislation. It would prevent Extreme Risk Protection Orders which would prevent someone at high risk for suicide or homicide due to a mental illness from having access to a gun. Suicide attempts with guns are lethal 8595% of the time and are the leading causes of gun deaths. This bill is extreme and dangerous. At a time when so many are in crisis in our state, and so many are struggling with mental illnesses, with our suicide rates climbing, we should be spending our time, resources and money helping Iowans...not working on bills that can prevent reasonable public safety laws in the future. I urge you to vote against this bill and to not advance it beyond this subcommittee meeting.

01-15-2021

Carrie Gosnell []

I grew up in a hunting family and have a tremendous amount of respect for the right to bear arms responsibly. I very much enjoy time hunting withmy family, learning where my food comes from and being a part of the entire process. However, in our family, we always knew that responsiblegun ownership was essential and protected the rights of futuregenerations to bear arms. People are just human beings, and we sometimesget things twisted. It's fair and right for us to have constraints on how we can use firearms. We have constraints on how we can use vehicles. We have to have insurance, wear a seatbelt and follow traffic laws. The point is that it is for the collective safety of all of our residents. Adding the high bar of "strict scrutiny" does not allow us to regulate those arms at all. I understand that the 2nd Amendment is a sacred right, but it is already covered by the US Constitution. The only thing we need to do is protect Iowans. We cannot protect Iowans when you take that ability away from us completely. Do not allow this bill to pass.

01-15-2021

Matthew Middleton []

I'm a married man in my 40s with a family. I fully support amending the state constitution to guarantee the right to keep and bear arms in our state. The United States constitution guarantees this right. While it may seem repetitious to amend our state constitution to reflect that federal document it reinforces the rights of citizens in our state. Like the discovery of fire, the firearm is a human invention that one cannot simply wish away. They will always be in our society either legally or illegally. It's just a simple fact. Pass the bill!

01-15-2021

Patricia Zebrowski [University of Iowa]

I am a gun violence survivor. I know all too well the destruction that unchecked access to guns causes to our lives, our families and our communities. Nowhere has the Iowa legislature clearly explained the rationale behind HSB9. Who among the citizens of Iowa are asking for this? NO ONE. In fact, public polling has shown that a majority of Iowa voters DO NOT support amending the constitution in a way that poses a direct threat to our communities. Represent the people of Iowa, not the NRA, gun manufacturers and sellers and their lobbyists. If this gets passed it will force the courts to use judicial analyses that are likely to lead to the dissolution of our public safety laws. In fact, the NRA itself has described such "strict scrutiny" amendments as the "iron wall" that will prevent state legislatures from enacting common sense gun safety laws. I implore you to have the integrity and courage to stand up for our health and safety. We elect you to do that.Sincerely,Patricia Zebrowski

01-15-2021

Kate Casaletto []

This is concerning to me as a mom and Iowan. By adding this language, we are putting our strong Iowa's gun laws at risk. Everyone I know in this state supports our background check system that works for so well and keeps guns out of those who should not have them. Felons and such. This type of scrutiny would put those at risk and spend thousands of dollars on court cases that could be guns in the hands of violent people. Please do not put this forward and focus on other issues that will help our state grow and attract talent to our workforce.

01-15-2021

Temple Hiatt [Moms Demand Action for Gun Sense in America]

Chair Holt & Members of the SubcommitteeThank you for considering public comments as you hold a hearing on HSB 9. I hope you will reject this dangerous proposal.I am an Iowan and an Army Reserve veteran who served in the first Gulf War with the 320th Military Police. Prior to that, I served with the 339th Military Police in Davenport, Iowa. After last weeks attempted coup at the United States Capitol Building, the FBI is warning of further armed demonstrations at the state Capitol in Des Moines. This moment calls for lawmakers to do more to prevent gun violence, rather than undermining Iowas gun safety laws. I fully support the 2nd Amendment. Unfortunately, this proposal is NOT the 2nd Amendment. With language that reads any and all restrictions, this is much more extreme. If strict scrutiny is applied to any and all restrictions this could remove public safety measures that the majority of Iowans support, such as background checks on handgun sales and permitting for concealed carry. I dont want convicted felons to have guns and I dont want guns on school grounds. This amendment will put all of that in jeopardy, with Iowa taxpayers funding all of the lawsuits filed by criminal defendants and extremists with criminal histories. Only three states have enacted strict scrutiny laws, and Iowa should not be the fourth. Respectfully submitted,Temple Hiatt

01-16-2021

Micki Henderson []

I have a concern about adding Strict Scrutiny to the constitution, for any amendment. Only 3 other states (Missouri, Louisiana, and Alabama) have strict scrutiny with the 2nd Amendment. Missouri has had concerns about the cost of litigating with strict scrutiny. Has anyone looked into how much it could cost Iowa to add those 2 words? Why not add the 2nd amendment without Strict Scrutiny? Why does the 2nd amendment need more scrutiny than the 1st or any other amendment?

01-16-2021

Elizabeth O'Hara []

To: Iowa House of Representatives Public Safety CommitteeIm writing to express my opposition to HSB9, my great concern at the way its sponsors have sought to rush the adoption of a constitutional amendment with so little public discussion, and my anger at the misrepresentation of this legislation as simply enshrining the federal Second Amendment in Iowas Constitution. I support the Second Amendment. HSB9 is NOT the Second Amendment, and it is not what the majority of Iowa voters want, as recent polls have demonstrated.When conservative icon Antonin Scalia wrote the majority opinion in the 2008 Supreme Court decision (District of Columbia v. Heller) that the Second Amendment protects the individual right to possess and carry handguns in ones homes for selfdefense, he made clear that nothing in our opinion should be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. This should be a relief to the majority of Iowans, including a majority of gun owners, who support permit regulations, universal background checks, and other sensible gun restrictions. Apparently the National Rifle Association, which authored this dangerous bill, begs to differ. In their version of the Second Amendment, any and all infringements on the right to bear arms will be subject to strict scrutiny by the courts. The future of Iowas sensible gun laws is an open question if this constitutional amendment is adopted. Only three states have adopted the NRAs version of the Second Amendment. Iowa should not be the fourth.Elizabeth OHaraIowa City

01-16-2021

PAUL CARLSON []

Please do not take this step. We do not need to encourage more guns in our society, nothing good will come of this. Law enforcement has a difficult time the way it is, encouraging more gun purchases makes their job more difficult.

01-16-2021

Robert Bacon []

Im writing in strong opposition to HSB9. By requiring a strict scrutiny analysis of any proposed gun restriction, HSB9 goes farther than the second amendment to the US Constitution. Ironically, the most pressing compelling state interest today given the increasing polarization of American society is continuing to institute common sense gun restrictions like background checks. The last thing we need at the present time is passing a law that would give insurrectionists like those who invaded the US Capitol last week more encouragement to arm themselves in pursuit of their political goals. Robert Bacon1418 Wild Prairie DriveIowa City, Iowa 52246

01-16-2021

Leslie Schwalm []

I write to ask you to oppose this bill. The proliferation of gun ownership poses a public health crisis, and this bill is a sneaky and undemocratic effort to block public discussions about our right to safety.

01-16-2021

Claire Shaw []

I am a new mom. I had my first baby 9 months ago and I am afraid of the Iowa he will grow up in if you go forward with the "strict scrutiny" constitutional amendment. If you adopt this amendment, you are placing my baby son at risk by allowing the potential for convicted felons and domestic abusers to posses firearms. You would be threateningIowa's ability to require background checks on handgun sales and permits to care a concealed handgun in Iowa. Please don't move forward with this to keep Iowa safe for my son. I have always been a proud Iowan, but don't want to be one of only three additional states that has this extreme language. Nearly 70% of voters do not support amending our constitution to undermine gun laws. Please protect the children of Iowa by not moving forward with this constitutional amendment.

01-16-2021

Julie Kearney []

Iowa legislature: I worry about what this strict scrutiny bill would do to our ability to simply protect us from people who have been suicidal or in domestic violence cases. We dont need this change to our laws. The people of Iowa support background checks and red flag laws as well as restrain open carry. Dont rush this bill through!

01-16-2021

Elizabeth Fischer [independent]

I have just become aware of proposal to amend the Iowa constitution to eliminate "any and all" restrictions on the right to bear arms. I find this proposal alarming. This would eliminate background checks and allow convicted felons to buy guns. This is not a reasonable way to protect Iowa citizens. It undermines existing public safety laws. I urge you to drop this proposal. We need Iowa to be safe and protected!

01-16-2021

Pam Nims []

I am in strong opposition to HSB 9. Iowas constitution is a sound and fair basis for the governing of our state. Amending it to specify no restrictions whatsoever to gun rights is incredibly wrong and not in the best interests of Iowans. I was born in Iowa and have lived much of my 48 years here. The vast majority of citizens support common sense gun laws, including universal background checks and getting guns out of the hands of those likely to do harm. This proposal goes in the opposite direction and does not make Iowans safer. This is a fringe and extreme approach that has no place in Iowa.

01-16-2021

Becky Soglin []

I urge you to not move forward with "strict scrutiny" amendment. It would make finding commonsense gun regulation even more difficult. The Second Amendment of our nation's Constitution already provides sufficient rights on bearing arms. Stop listening to the NRA and do what is right for Iowa no strict scrutiny. Thank you.

01-16-2021

Julia Wasson []

Restricting "any and all restrictions" on gun rights is an absolutely irresponsible thing to do. Are you planning to allow children to own guns? Are you planning to allow sexual predators and domestic abusers to own guns? Do you really not worry about the safety of our children at school? Or the safety of families who live with an abuser? For that matter, your own safety in YOUR workplace?My nowdeceased father was mentally ill. I remember him telling me that he wished he had a gun so he could shoot the Hispanic family who lived next door to him in Cedar Rapids. I was terrified. He didn't have the means to get a gun, and I warned a former relative who owned a local gun shop not to sell to him. But what if he had been able to buy a gun? Would he have killed his neighbors, whom he didn't even know, but whose very existence seemed to drive him to think this violent thought? Why should someone who is suffering from mental illness have the right to own a gun? What about the safety of the rest of us?Do you really want more school shootings? Concert shootings? Loan officer shootings? Restrict gun ownership to mentally stable individuals. Restrict where they can be carried. Use reason when contemplating this illadvised law. If you don't, then any gunrelated death in Iowa will be squarely on your heads.

01-16-2021

Julia Wasson []

Removing "any and all restrictions" on gun rights is an absolutely irresponsible thing to do. Are you planning to allow children to own guns? Are you planning to allow sexual predators and domestic abusers to own guns? Do you really not worry about the safety of our children at school? Or the safety of families who live with an abuser? For that matter, your own safety in YOUR workplace?My nowdeceased father was mentally ill. I remember him telling me that he wished he had a gun so he could shoot the Hispanic family who lived next door to him in Cedar Rapids. I was terrified. He didn't have the means to get a gun, and I warned a former relative who owned a local gun shop not to sell to him. But what if he had been able to buy a gun? Would he have killed his neighbors, whom he didn't even know, but whose very existence seemed to drive him to think this violent thought? Why should someone who is suffering from mental illness have the right to own a gun? What about the safety of the rest of us?Do you really want more school shootings? Concert shootings? Loan officer shootings? Restrict gun ownership to mentally stable individuals. Restrict where they can be carried. Use reason when contemplating this illadvised law. If you don't, then any gunrelated death in Iowa will be squarely on your heads.

01-16-2021

Diana Boeglin []

The Second Amendment of the US Constitutions protects the existence of a WELLREGULATED militia. This Strict Scrutiny bill would endanger Iowans, and goes against what the majority of Iowans want. A majority of voters in Iowa, including 70% of Republican women, say they would never vote for a candidate who doesnt support background checks on all gun sales. In fact, opposing background checks on all gun sales was the most disqualifying candidate position among suburban women by a sixpoint margin. I am calling on your to drop this bill. It's not what Iowans want, and it will endanger citizens.

01-17-2021

Rachel Bruns []

I oppose this. Iowans can already access guns. This will just result in more lives lost and more lawsuits for the state of Iowa. Why are we pushing legislation for the NRA when they are morally and financially bankrupt? Their own donors are turning against them. Please dont let this proceed.

01-17-2021

Mei-Ling Shaw []

In light of the January 6th attacks on our democracy, it is unconscionable to remove the most basic of restrictions and background checks for firearms. It is detrimental to our democracy and grossly irresponsible to those serving to keep our communities safe. This lack of even the most basic of concern for your citizens, for school children, for domestic abuse survivors, for police tasked with protecting against domestic terrorism, and for your constituents is immoral, unpatriotic, and unacceptable.

01-17-2021

Dr. Rachael Sokol []

I am opposed to allowing felons and previous domestic abusers keeping guns and obtaining guns. Gun violence is high, and obviously very lethal. These people already have a bad track record and now giving them the right to keep and obtain guns? Im not opposed to guns, in fact I have a gun myself. But, Im also a law abiding citizen with a lot of gun safety training. Additionally, this is very personal to me. Ive been in an abusive marriage for many years. After being assaulted several times, finally I am moving on. However he continues to possess guns. I am always in fear, as he still threatens me and harasses me. Police and all know he has guns, ammo etc. and yet, nothing? In fact, there is an order to preserve to bring those guns back. Still, not returned and in his possession. So, now we are going to support situations like this? Guns in this situation need to be controlled. More stringent laws need to protect all is us Iowans. I know Im not the only person with this situation....I see gun violence in my ER all the time. Please help

01-17-2021

Jone Johnson []

I'm a Registered Nurse, born in Greene County, educated at Luther College in Decorah (graduating in 1982). I am a certified Pediatric Nurse and have seen the effects of gun violence (mostly suicide) since the early years of my career. Please do NOT amend Iowa's constitution. We need the popular laws that have supported safe gun ownership; and we also need the laws that protect us from those that we don't want guns available to (people dealing with Depression and other mental health issues). As a nurse, I have answered the emergency phone call that says "Lady, send an ambulance quick. My friend just shot himself." (This person was killed instantly.)Please do what is best for all Iowans. Keep popular gun safety laws. But leave the constitution as is. I believe Strict Scrutiny will only lead to more lives lost. I'm in the business of helping people live. Please help me be successful. Nurses need your support of keeping people alive.

01-17-2021

Dennis Cooper [Humanity]

We do not need strict scrutiny placed around the 2nd Amendment in Iowa. It would make us considerably less safe to allow felons, insurrectionists, and dangerously mentally ill people to own guns. Our laws to keep guns out of places like schools and government buildings would become difficult to enforce and expensive to protect from legal challenges. Missouri enacted a similar and has seen an increase in gun deaths. Iowa is better than a shithole state like Missouri.

01-17-2021

Jesse Singerman []

Please do not pass House Study Bill 9 (HSB 9. We need more control of guns, fewer guns and more consideration of the rights and the safety of the public than catering to a fringe of of gun owners. This legislation would go much further in protecting gun rights than the Second Amendment to the US Constitution does, because the language of the Second Amendment does not say (and the US Supreme Court has never held), that strict scrutiny applies to all gun regulations.The proposed strictscrutiny amendment could make it much more difficult to pass any commonsense gun reform legislation in Iowa and could even invalidate the States existing limits on gun rights (like the law that felons cannot have guns or that guns are not allowed in sensitive places like schools). This would be absolutely crazy! States that have adopted strict scrutiny language have seen costly legal battles to preserve common sense gun laws, and in some cases prosecutors have even declined to enforce them. Gun deaths have increased dramatically in Missouri since its passage of a similar amendment in 2014.After the scenes in the US Capital last week (January 6th) it is obvious we need to be very cautious about making it easier for people to own and carry guns. HB 9 is step in the wrong direction and should absolutely not be passed out of committee.

01-17-2021

Rebecca Don []

This amendment is dangerous and financially irresponsible. Imposing the "strict scrutiny" standard (which is not a part of the 2nd Amendment, contrary to what this amendment is trying to suggest), at a time when so many are hurting financially, this amendment would dramatically increase the amount of taxpayer money going to litigation litigation which would also undercutting the current laws that keep Iowans safe from death, injury and threat of gun violence.

01-17-2021

Loretta Benz []

I am unequivocally opposed to the resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Iowa relating to the right of the people to keep and bear arms.The proposed strictscrutiny amendment could make it much more difficult to pass any commonsense gun reform legislation in Iowa and could invalidate the States existing limits on gun rights (le.g., the law that felons cannot have guns or that guns are not allowed in sensitive places like schools). This resolution undermines common sense gun laws that allow gun ownership under reasonable circumstances while assuring public safety.States that have adopted strict scrutiny language have seen costly legal battles to preserve common sense gun laws, and in some cases prosecutors have even declined to enforce them. For example, gunrelated deaths have increased dramatically in Missouri since its passage of a similar amendment in 2014.After the January 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capital, which included armed violators, this is a reckless resolution that would further undermine public safety in this country. I request that the resolution be withdrawn.

01-17-2021

Deb Coates []

Most Iowans, including many responsible hunters and gun owners, are in favor of common sense gun legislation. Adding language like strict scrutiny makes it more difficult for Iowans to live safely and to keep our children safe in schools and in their own homes. I support hunting. I support safe gun sports. I support responsible Iowans owning guns that they are trained on and capable of using safely. I do not support this amendment. And I think there are critical issues for Iowansincluding economics, COVID vaccination rollout, and water quality that are more deserving of the attention of the Iowa legislature.

01-17-2021

Kristine Klein [homeowner]

I find this amendment to our Iowa constitution offensive. Why spend time and money on something that is already guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution 2nd amendment.Isn't this country already armed to the teeth? Do Iowans feel the need to open carry weapons to schools, nursery schools, libraries, the doctors office, the grocery store, the closing store, the pedicurist and the list goes on. S T O P the madness!!!We DO NOT need more guns and more laws protecting these frightened Republicans right to bear arms. I mean ARE YOU KIDDING??!!!Spend time and money on things that actually improve people's lives.

01-17-2021

Denise Kanne []

As an Iowan I would like to respectfully express my concern for HSB9. In these tumultuous times when we have watched violence unfold, most recently at our nation's capitol, I am concerned about any measure that could hinder common sense public safety laws in our state. Current public safety measures like prohibition of gun possession by convicted felons and domestic abusers and concealed weapons permitting are supported by most Iowans including gun owners. Having to meet the legal bar of strict scrutiny in Iowa's constitution would likely spell challenges to these reasonable laws. Not only could this amendment erode measures that increase safety for Iowans and keep guns out of the hands of people intent to do harm, there is also the very real possibility there will be great expense to the state of Iowa when legal challenges arise.

01-17-2021

Jane Robinette []

HSB 9 is not an attempt to add the Second Amendment right to the Iowa Constitution. Democrats previously proposed an amendment that exactly mirrors the US Constitutions Second Amendment and the Republican majority voted it down.Under this proposed amendment to the Iowa Constitution, ALL state gun safety regulations would be subject to "strict scrutiny," the highest level of constitutional review available. Any regulation concerning firearms would have to further a compelling government interest in a narrowly tailored manner and in the least restrictive possible way. Every commonsense gun safety regulation would be challenged in court. It goes well beyond the federal Second Amendment and is terribly unwise in light of the suicide rate, mass shootings, private 3Dprinting of firearms, Capitol insurrection, and more. I also find it not just a little ironic (and tragic) that a subcommittee of nearly the same people will be meeting in the same hour to advance two constitutional amendments, one of which will elevate the right to bear arms to the highest level, and the other which will completely remove the right to bodily integrity and autonomy for a pregnant person.Please vote NO on HSB 9.

01-17-2021

Janet Rosenbury [Iowans for Gun Safety Legislative Chair]

Please oppose adding an amendment to the Iowa Constitution that includes "strict scrutiny" for any gun safety laws. "Strict scrutiny," which would require the highest standard for any gun safety law, would place all of Iowa's gun safety laws in danger of being struck down by the courts. This Amendment is not a mirror of the Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. In fact, the Iowa House and Senate have each voted down efforts to substitute the U.S. Second Amendment version in the past.Only three states include NRApushed "strict scrutiny" language in their gun rights amendments and Iowa should not be the fourth.

01-17-2021

Constance Peterson []

I am against guns, period. This misguided bill, especially during this time of home grown terror, is wrong and takes us back to the wild west days and does not look forward to more enlightenment and peace. When will Iowa join the 20th century?

01-17-2021

Mary Mockaitis []

Iowa is already known to have laws that are very lenient in the favor of gun ownership. Do not allow more guns into the hands of those who will use them carelessly. When Missouri passed this type of a law in 2014 gun deaths went up. Please stop HSB 9.

01-17-2021

Karen Greenleaf []

I am a mother and grandmother and native Iowan. I am against HSB9. Most Iowans support background checks and common sense gun laws. Removing all gun restrictions will not keep the citizens of Iowa safe. Please stop this from happening. Sincerely, Karen Greenleaf

01-17-2021

Nicholas Pryor [March For Our Lives Iowa]

I strongly urge the subcommittee to vote against the unpopular and dangerous HSB 9. Passing this amendment makes Iowans less safe in a time where the FBI has warned of further armed protests in Iowa after January 6th attack on the Capitol. Similar strict scrutiny amendments have only harmed residents in other states that have passed these amendments. Gun deaths have dramatically risen in Missouri since they passed their similar amendment in 2014. A strict scrutiny amendment is also deeply unpopular with Iowans. Polling by Everytown shows that nearly 70% of Iowans do not support a strict scrutiny amendment. I strongly urge the subcommittee to save the lives of countless Iowans by voting down HSB 9.

01-17-2021

Andrew Dunn [March For Our Lives Iowa]

I strongly urge the subcommittee to vote against the unpopular and dangerous HSB 9. Passing this amendment makes Iowans less safe in a time where the FBI has warned of further armed protests in Iowa after the January 6th attack on the Capitol. Similar strict scrutiny amendments have only harmed residents in other states that have passed these amendments. Gun deaths have dramatically risen in Missouri since they passed their similar amendment in 2014. A strict scrutiny amendment is also deeply unpopular with Iowans. Polling by Everytown shows that nearly 70% of Iowans do not support a strict scrutiny amendment. I strongly urge the subcommittee to save the lives of countless Iowans by voting down HSB 9.

01-17-2021

Esha Bolar [March For Our Lives Iowa]

We strongly urge the subcommittee to vote against the unpopular and dangerous HSB 9. Passing this amendment makes Iowans less safe in a time where the FBI has warned of further armed protests in Iowa after the January 6th attack on the Capitol. Similar strict scrutiny amendments have only harmed residents in other states that have passed these amendments. Gun deaths have dramatically risen in Missouri since they passed a similar amendment in 2014. A strict scrutiny amendment is also deeply unpopular with Iowans. Polling by Everytown shows that nearly 70% of Iowans do not support a strict scrutiny amendment. I we strongly urge the subcommittee to save the lives of countless Iowans by voting down HSB 9.

01-17-2021

Akshara Eswar [March For Our Lives Iowa]

I strongly urge the subcommittee to vote against the unpopular and dangerous HSB 9. Passing this amendment makes Iowans less safe in a time where the FBI has warned of further armed protests in Iowa after the January 6th attack on the Capitol. Similar strict scrutiny amendments have only harmed residents in other states that have passed these amendments. Gun deaths have dramatically risen in Missouri since they passed a similar amendment in 2014. A strict scrutiny amendment is also deeply unpopular with Iowans. Polling by Everytown shows that nearly 70% of Iowans do not support a strict scrutiny amendment. I strongly urge the subcommittee to save the lives of countless Iowans by voting down HSB 9.

01-17-2021

Kyle Kopf [March For Our Lives Iowa]

I strongly urge the subcommittee to vote against the unpopular and dangerous HSB 9. Passing this amendment makes Iowans less safe in a time where the FBI has warned of further armed protests in Iowa after the January 6th attack on the Capitol. Similar strict scrutiny amendments have only harmed residents in other states that have passed these amendments. Gun deaths have dramatically risen in Missouri since they passed a similar amendment in 2014. A strict scrutiny amendment is also deeply unpopular with Iowans. Polling by Everytown shows that nearly 70% of Iowans do not support a strict scrutiny amendment. I strongly urge the subcommittee to save the lives of countless Iowans by voting down HSB 9.

01-17-2021

Dominic Eastman [March For Our Lives ]

I strongly urge the subcommittee to vote against the unpopular and dangerous HSB 9. Passing this amendment makes Iowans less safe in a time where the FBI has warned of further armed protests in Iowa after the January 6th attack on the Capitol. Similar strict scrutiny amendments have only harmed residents in other states that have passed these amendments. Gun deaths have dramatically risen in Missouri since they passed a similar amendment in 2014. A strict scrutiny amendment is also deeply unpopular with Iowans. Polling by Everytown shows that nearly 70% of Iowans do not support a strict scrutiny amendment. I strongly urge the subcommittee to save the lives of countless Iowans by voting down HSB 9.

01-17-2021

Lauren Wessling [March for our Lives Iowa]

I strongly urge the subcommittee to vote against the unpopular and dangerous HSB 9. Passing this amendment makes Iowans less safe in a time where the FBI has warned of further armed protests in Iowa after the January 6th attack on the Capitol. Similar strict scrutiny amendments have only harmed residents in other states that have passed these amendments. Gun deaths have dramatically risen in Missouri since they passed a similar amendment in 2014. A strict scrutiny amendment is also deeply unpopular with Iowans. Polling by Everytown shows that nearly 70% of Iowans do not support a strict scrutiny amendment. I we strongly urge the subcommittee to save the lives of countless Iowans by voting down HSB 9.

01-17-2021

Ella Bergen [March For Our Lives Iowa]

I strongly urge the subcommittee to vote against the unpopular and dangerous HSB 9. Passing this amendment makes Iowans less safe in a time where the FBI has warned of further armed protests in Iowa after the January 6th attack on the Capitol. Similar strict scrutiny amendments have only harmed residents in other states that have passed these amendments. Gun deaths have dramatically risen in Missouri since they passed a similar amendment in 2014. A strict scrutiny amendment is also deeply unpopular with Iowans. Polling by Everytown shows that nearly 70% of Iowans do not support a strict scrutiny amendment. I strongly urge the subcommittee to save the lives of countless Iowans by voting down HSB 9.

01-17-2021

Abigail Wharton [March For Our Lives Iowa]

I strongly urge the subcommittee to vote against the unpopular and dangerous HSB 9. Passing this amendment makes Iowans less safe in a time where the FBI has warned of further armed protests in Iowa after the January 6th attack on the Capitol. I am a freshman in Johnston, and I have grown up practicing intruder drills. This bill would make it harder to keep students like me safe at school. Similar strict scrutiny amendments have only harmed residents in other states that have passed these amendments. Gun deaths have dramatically risen in Missouri since they passed a similar amendment in 2014. A strict scrutiny amendment is also deeply unpopular with Iowans. Polling by Everytown shows that nearly 70% of Iowans do not support a strict scrutiny amendment. I strongly urge the subcommittee to save the lives of countless Iowans by voting down HSB 9.

01-17-2021

Olivia Gayther [March For Our Lives Iowa]

I we strongly urge the subcommittee to vote against the unpopular and dangerous HSB 9. Passing this amendment makes Iowans less safe in a time where the FBI has warned of further armed protests in Iowa after the January 6th attack on the Capitol. Similar strict scrutiny amendments have only harmed residents in other states that have passed these amendments. Gun deaths have dramatically risen in Missouri since they passed a similar amendment in 2014. A strict scrutiny amendment is also deeply unpopular with Iowans. Polling by Everytown shows that nearly 70% of Iowans do not support a strict scrutiny amendment. I we strongly urge the subcommittee to save the lives of countless Iowans by voting down HSB 9.

01-17-2021

Lexi Duffy []

I strongly urge the subcommittee to vote against the unpopular and dangerous HSB 9. Passing this amendment makes Iowans less safe in a time where the FBI has warned of further armed protests in Iowa after the January 6th attack on the Capitol. Similar strict scrutiny amendments have only harmed residents in other states that have passed these amendments. Gun deaths have dramatically risen in Missouri since they passed a similar amendment in 2014. A strict scrutiny amendment is also deeply unpopular with Iowans. Polling by Everytown shows that nearly 70% of Iowans do not support a strict scrutiny amendment. I strongly urge the subcommittee to save the lives of countless Iowans by voting down HSB 9.

01-17-2021

Monica Maloney-Mitros []

I am writing to ask you to reject this amendment. Reject strict scrutiny. Who will benefit from this amendment? Who will be safer because of this amendment? No one. The language of the bill opens the people of Iowa, our state, to having no common sense gun laws like universal background checks and keeping guns off of school property and out of the hands of those who have been convicted of a felony. We already have the Second Amendment. The state of Iowa does not need a stricter amendment. The people of Iowa support common sense gun restrictions. Please reject this proses amendment.Thank you!!

01-18-2021

Ellen Ruden []

Please make sensible, gun safety laws for Iowa. A gun should come with the same regulation as driving a car, if not more. Law abiding gun owners shouldnt have a problem with waiting periods, background checks, registration, gun safety classes, etc... Blind people should not be able to shoot guns! Felons should not be able to own guns. Domestic violence offenders should not have access to guns. People with mental illness in their home should not be able to have guns. There are some very common sense ideas to keep everyone safe and it is your responsibility as lawmakers to enact them.

01-18-2021

Jim Ruebush [Retired teacher]

I do not favor this bill. There are more than enough laws giving gun rights to people. Instead, focus your energy and time on laws that benefit public health and the education of our youth.

01-18-2021

Walter Diers []

I am an Iowa citizen, veteran, and hunter/gun owner. I am also well aware of the damage a gun can inflict on a living body.Strict Scrutiny is a confusing misnomer. Rather than offering greater protection to Iowa citizens, it provides a mechanism to circumvent, strike down, or prevent laws that protect our citizens. I believe it is the role of government to protect and enhance the lives of its citizens.There are reasonable gun laws, supported by a sizable majority of citizens, that do not stifle second amendment gun rights. Iowa legislators are moving in the opposite direction suggested by this majority; they are weakening laws that protect its citizens.A constitutional amendment preemptively ties the hands of future legislators with respect to considering laws that may fall under strict scrutiny. I strongly oppose a constitutional amendment with regards to strict scrutiny.

01-18-2021

Lori Durian []

As a constituent, and a mother of three children, I urge you not to pass this law. Including the strict scrutiny language to the constitutional amendment will prevent the legislature from considering gun violence prevention measures to keep our citizens safe. The state would no longer be able to prevent convicted felons or those found guilty of domestic violence from obtaining a gun, putting all of us at risk. The state would no longer be able to require comprehensive background checks, a measure supported by the vast majority of Iowans. Please keep your constituents safe and do not pass this law.

01-18-2021

Marci Roe [Select or enter]

I believe we need to protect our right to bear arms and wording should include the restriction of felons and those with mental illness from being excluded from this right. Those who suggest that the violence is caused by accessibilty to guns should take a good look at a town like Chicago where guns are illegal but has the highest gun violence of anywhere in our nation. Taking away law abiding citizens ability to have guns will not keep them out of the hands of those who want to do violence. Furthermore the violence at our nations capital was largely committed without guns so using that event as an excuse to limit guns ownership is just a ploy to take away our rights.

01-18-2021

Lynn Bjorlin []

I am a resident of Polk County and a supporter of the 2nd amendment to the U.S. Constitution. However, legislation that prevents any restriction is irresponsible. There always has to be opportunity for discussion. This is more embarrassment for the state of Iowa. Please reconsider.

01-18-2021

Elinor Levin []

I'm writing to express my extreme displeasure to see HSB9 coming back around. People who work to prevent any common sense restrictionson private gun purchase and ownership are a danger to our community, our state, and our lives. I, personally, already have known a person who has demonstratedto be a danger to themself and others be defended and protected by a judge who was only concerned aboutmaking sure that this individual retained their rights to private gun ownership.Please consider the reality of every study on gun deaths as a public health crisis, and dismiss this threat to our safety.

01-18-2021

Linda Jones []

Please do not move this bill forward. Guns do not belong in the hands of felons & they have no place in or near schools. Background checks are strongly supported by most law enforcement officials and agencies. The US needs to look at Australia and most European countries as a model for gun policy. Until research on gun violence in the US is done by the CDC as a public health hazard there should be no relaxing of current gun laws.

01-18-2021

Siri Bruhn []

As a public school teacher working in the state of Iowa, I strongly oppose this amendment to the Constitution of Iowa. I find it extremely irresponsible to pass amendments that work in opposition with the gun sense legislation intended to protect children while they are learning in public schools. This amendment would make it EASIER for any armed person to enter a public school and inflict trauma on children who are utterly defenseless. Furthermore, it would prevent Courts from upholding VERY SENSIBLE laws that prevent troubled felons from purchasing weapons that we cannot assume they will use responsibly. These laws also keep me and my students safe by preventing guns on school campuses. Please do not use your position of power to uphold the rights of individuals to inflict damage and trauma at the expense of the safety of your defenseless children and mine.

01-18-2021

Helen Burford []

I object to the proposed amendment to the Iowa Constitution. The rights of Iowa Citizens are not violated by existing laws and regulations. This amendment takes second amendment rights above the law Its people not guns that the laws protect

01-18-2021

KEVIN HECKMAN []

Dears sirs,As a parent and citizen, I feel our current gun laws accurately reflect each citizens right to own and bear arms. As such, any strict scrutiny amendment is unnecessary and I would ask the legislature turn their attention to more pressing matters such as Covid 19 response.

01-18-2021

Sally Walker-Jondal []

As an avid gun owner, collector and hunter I am aware of the need for common sense gun regulation. There are many in our society (as witnessed at our capitol) who are not capable of being responsible gun owners. I oppose this ammendment.

01-18-2021

Ruth Spinks []

HSB9 I am strongly opposed to HSB9. If this bill were mere legislation it would be outrageous; however the fact that this is a Constitutional Amendment makes HSB9 an abomination.For too many years the NRA has been able to buy any legislation it desires. Now the NRA and its last remaining purchased legislators are trying to buy a Constitutional Amendment. It is criminal. The people overwhelmingly support reasonable gun control. This proposed Amendment flies in the face of the wishes of 80% of the populace. Furthermore, a Constitutional Amendment is well beyond the traditional norm in governing, legislation. I am strongly opposed to using the Constitution to force undesirable restrictions upon the people. Toying with the Constitutional for a political agenda is disgusting and the authors of HSB9 should be quite ashamed. Again I am vehemently opposed to HSB9. Sincerely,Dr. Ruth SpinksIowa City

01-18-2021

Sally Walker-Jondal []

How can you possibly believe you should have the right to regulate my womb but not guns. I am appalled at your persecution of women by subjecting them to forced birth but somehow you don't see the need to regulate the male dominated gun ownership arena.

01-18-2021

Nicole VanderLinden []

Years ago, I lost an uncle to gun violence, a sad situation that bears out time and time again in the United States, far surpassing other industrialized countries. I implore you to reconsider making commonsense gun reform even more difficult in the state of Iowa. Please ask yourself: Is the solution to our country's fractured psyche really and truly more (and more accessible) guns? As a constituent, I feel very strongly that the proposed amendment would be a terrible and grave mistake.

01-18-2021

John FAIRWEATHER [New Beginnings Christian Church]

I am old enough to remember when the NRA was opposed to selling or owning automatic weapons of war. Of course that was before the main NRA funding came from their invidual members and not gun manufacturers and sellers. Makers and sellers of guns stand to lose millions of dollars if gun shows cannot sell to criminals and drug gangs without background checks. The NRA used to have the view that reasonable laws were not antisecond amendment. Even the conservative supreme court justices noted that nothing in their extension of rights to own and carry as it applied to individuals still allows the government is to enact reasonable limits. No article of the bill of rights is absolute. Why do second amendment absolutists think it is the only article of the bill of rights that is sacred and unlimited is the 2nd amendment? HSB is well down the slippery slope to absolutism.

01-18-2021

Guillermo Morales []

Iowans deserve to retain the ability to pursue common sense gun reform. We should not tie our hands with a constitutional amendment that will become an obstacle as gun technology, even 3D printing technology, advances beyond what can be imagined today. We need sensible gun reform, not an amendment that would prevent it.

01-18-2021

Katy Gomes []

I do not support this amendment. Given our country's history of violence, and especially mass murder in recent history, we cannot allow gun ownership restrictions to loosen. The second amendment is not an unlimited right to bear arms. It is our governments responsibility to ensure the safety of its citizens. Please vote no on this amendment.

01-18-2021

Colleen Schmitt [- Select -]

Dear Iowa Legislators:Are you seriously considering HSB 9 after all of the horrific tragedies we've experienced in this country as a result of unregulated firearms? This amendment is dangerous and particularly tone deaf to the outrage and grief so many Americans feel about politicians' refusal to address the fact of these ongoing tragedies.How many students and teachers and innocent civilians must die awful deaths by automatic weapons? Please give equal consideration to the mass deaths caused by a refusal to regulate "our right" to bear arms. The 2nd Amendment was created before the age of AK47s. If you're worried about Americans defending themselves against an illegitimate government or a stolen election, check your facts & irresponsible conspiracy theories, and consider how dangerous it could have been to so many lives, and to our democracy, to have that angry Capitol mob carrying automatic weapons. People were running for their lives that day.I am so fed up not only by this proposed constitutional amendment, but also by your (legislators') DECADES of collective refusal to act to protect Americans from firearms of mass destruction. All in the name of freedom to put others at risk. Good governments act to protect the people: seat belts, cigarette label warnings, background checks, masks, regulation of controlled substances AND sensible regulation of guns. Sincerely,Colleen Schmitt

01-18-2021

Diane Lahr []

If this amendment becomes part of our constitution, it will become much more difficult to pass any kind of commonsense gun reform legislation in Iowa, even when we have control of the government. It gets worse. This amendment would likely force the courts to throw out most of our state's existing gun control laws. For example, Iowa law currently prevents felons from owning or purchasing guns, and it also does not allow guns in schools. If these two laws were reversed, then what's the final result? You guessed it: this amendment would ensure that every felon who wants to carry a loaded gun into a public school has a constitutional right to do so in the state of Iowa. (We need increased background checks and waiting periods to purchase any guns. Including intense mandatory gun classes.)

01-18-2021

Kathryn Crawford []

I strongly urge the subcommittee to vote against the unpopular and dangerous HSB 9. Passing this amendment makes Iowans less safe in a time when the FBI has warned of further armed protests in Iowa after the January 6th attack on the Capitol. Similar strict scrutiny amendments have only harmed residents in other states that have passed these amendments. Gun deaths have dramatically risen in Missouri since they passed a similar amendment in 2014. A strict scrutiny amendment is also deeply unpopular with Iowans. Polling by Everytown shows that nearly 70% of Iowans do not support a strict scrutiny amendment. I strongly urge the subcommittee to save the lives of countless Iowans by voting down HSB 9.

01-18-2021

Audrey Allen []

I strongly urge the subcommittee to vote against the dangerous and unpopular HSB 9. Passing this bill makes Iowans less safe in this time of unprecedented violence. The FBI warns of further armed protests in Iowa after January 6th. Acts like the HSB 9, have only harmed residents in other states. Gun deaths have only increased in Missouri since the state passed and amendment similar to HSB 9 in 2014. A strict scrutiny amendment is very unpopular with Iowans. Nearly 70% of Iowans. I urge the subcommittee to save the lives of Iowans by voting down HSB 9.

01-18-2021

Colter Frederick []

Please vote "No." to the passage of this legislation. Gun Rights are already protected under the 2nd Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Do not waste the time of this legislative session with redundant laws.

01-18-2021

Glenn Goetz [Iowa County Democrats]

There is nothing "well regulated" about strict scrutiny being used to allow more untrained, unqualified, and dangerous people to keep, bear, and use firearms as they see fit. Experience in the US compared to other nations shows that more guns, loosely regulated, equates to more gun violence. To spare the suffering that will result from this amendment, it must be voted down.

01-18-2021

Cecilia Norris []

I strongly oppose HSB 9. The right to bear arms is not absolute. There is no reason for felons to be able to own weapons or those who have shown intent to use those weapons to harm others. Organizations as well as public facilities should have the right to forbid weapons in their establishments. Schools and health care facilities are 2 places that come to mind that should not allow guns. I am not antigun but to say that everyone has that right when it has a high potential to infringe on others' right to life is not reasonable or moral. There also needs to be a way to keep guns out of the hands of suicidal individuals. Suicide attempt by gun is much more fatal than by any other method. We do not need an amendment to the Constitution that would effectively prohibit any logical discussion and appropriate, sensible gun control legislation.

01-18-2021

Francoise Gourronc []

Hello my name is Francoise Gourronc. I am writing against HSB9.The right to bear arm comes with great responsibility that is not addressed enough. There are too many victims of gun violence to consider this right unrestricted. The amendment proposed by HS9 is in total disrespect to the innocent victims taken away from us, by guns whose owners thought they didn't need to be held accountable.Mental illness and paranoid disorder have to be considered as well. There is no point to let a person in distress alone with a gun unchecked.Finally, Iowans already have a right to bear arm guarantied by the US Constitution and regulation is already minimal, what more is there to do for gun owners?

01-18-2021

Dennis Dietz [individual]

HSB 6 should NOT be approved. No personal right can be unlimited and unrestrained. This amendment would do just that. Owning a firearm should not be higher than any other personal rights we have.The strict scrutiny requirement will make it nearly impossible to do anything to manage having dangerous instruments in the hands of ever more citizens or where they may be carried. Recent events have caused huge demand for firearms which has only benefited the firearms industry. The fear that now permeates our society has caused individuals to irrationally believe that having a firearm will make them safer. It is statistically reasonable to predict that the more firearms there are in the hands of more individuals, the more firearm related incidents there will be. The FBI has been warning about domestic danger from militias and other similar organizations for years. This amendment will make it impossible to manage the ability of those antigovernment groups to arm themselves. This is a threat to the State of Iowa and our Federal Government. If the events of the last week have shown anything, they have shown the dangers of making firearms ever more available and easier to use. It is important that we be able to keep firearms out of the hands of individuals who should not have them.If you absolutely must have such a provision in the Constitution of Iowa, it must mirror the Second Amendment of the United States Constitution.

01-18-2021

Caitlin Owens []

I am writing in opposition to HSB 9. This legislation is a threat to the safety and wellbeing of Iowans. It threatens established and essential public safety laws like those that prohibit convicted felons and domestic abusers from having guns, and the background check requirements that ensure those prohibited purchasers cant legally purchase guns. Isn't it sad that 2020 was the first year of my adult life that I didn't think about what I would do in the event of an active shooter in my workplace everytime I was at work simply because I was working from home? I want a safe community for myself, my family, and my neighbors. Please do your part in helping Iowans stay safe and thrive. Sincerely,Caitlin Owens

01-18-2021

Randy Leete []

I support HSB 9 as it brings IA in line with The federal statutes already in place. I never had a cc until our local sheriff recommended to me that I get one. Living in rural IA many small towns do not have police to rely on. Sometimes local law enforcements may need a helping hand.

01-18-2021

Sandee Lyons []

I oppose HSB9. Iowans already have a constitutional right to bear arms under the United States Constitution. Why are we wasting resources to include this redundant measure in the Iowa Constitution? What I would encourage is that the Iowa legislature instead enact common sensegun safety laws. A person needs to be educated, registered, licensed, and insured to drive a vehicle. A gun owner should also be required to be properly educated on the safe use and storage of weapons, registered, licensed, and ensured to use a gun.

01-18-2021

Allison Carr []

Please do not move forward with this bill. Since Missouri passed this bill in 2014, gun deaths have dramatically increased. Gun violence is out of control around the country, and we have abundant evidence that increased accessibility to guns increases the dangers ordinary people face in their day to day lives. As a teacher and a parent, I am pleading with you to please leave space for common sense gun laws by putting this amendment to bed.

01-18-2021

Jennifer Gardner []

As a mom of a teen and young adult, I strongly oppose HSB 9. Iowans already have Second Amendment rights protected by the US Constitution. Adding gun rights with strict scrutiny to the Iowa Constitution would place Iowans in harms way by putting all of Iowas commonsense gun safety laws and future legislation in danger of being struck down by a court, including but not limited to:Prohibition of a felon to own or carry a gunBackground check requirements for all handgunsProhibition to carry on school groundsRequired carry permits, including conceal carryAge limits to get a permit to carry a handgunTraining requirement for initial permit to carryAfter the events on Jan. 6 at the Federal Capitol, we do not need less gun restrictions. I want my kids to grow up with common sense gun laws that protect them from harm.

01-18-2021

The Rev. Jeanie Smith [St. Timothy's Episcopal Church, West Des Moines, Iowa]

Gun rights are already secured by the second amendment to the US constitution. This proposed amendment would eliminate our ability to enact gunsafety provisions that are broadly supported by a majority of citizens background checks, age limits on gun purchases, restrictions against ownership of guns by felons, and many more. Please do not take this initiative further. It deserves to die in committee.

01-18-2021

Hannah Lyons []

Tens of thousands of lives are unnecessarily lost to gun violence in the US each year (https://giffords.org/lawcenter/gunviolencestatistics/). Gun violence is a crisis in the US as well as a public health crisis (https://www.americanprogress.org/issues/gunscrime/news/2019/11/20/477218/gunviolenceamericastatestateanalysis/). In 2019, 45 school shootings occurred in 46 weeks (https://www.cnn.com/2019/11/15/us/2019usschoolshootingstrnd/index.html). Also in 2019, 417 mass shootings plagued the US, with 3 of these mass shooting tragedies occurring in Iowa (https://www.gvpedia.org/wpcontent/uploads/2020/07/IowaMassShootingsStateFactSheet1.pdf; https://www.cbsnews.com/news/massshootings2019morethandays365/). In the midst of this veritable crisis, We should be instituting further gun safety regulations such as universal background checks, restricting assault weapons, banning largecapacity magazines, strengthening concealed carry laws, empowering local authorities to regulate firearms, and restricting bulk purchases of firearms, NOT creating further obstacles to such lifesaving safety regulation (https://giffords.org/lawcenter/gunlaws/states/iowa/). Iowans should not have to live in fear of gun violence. Ownership and operation of firearms in Iowa and the wider United States should be subject to the same amount and extent of safety regulations as motor vehicles. As an individual who has experienced the fear of an armed shooter lockdown during my high school career, I urge you to vote NO against this proposed amendment which will further endanger the lives and safety of our citizens.I encourage you to access the sources provided in this comment. Hannah Lyons

01-18-2021

Susan Jacobi []

I am writing to express my opposition to introduction of a strict scrutiny amendment to the Iowa constitutionHSB 9. This amendment will pose a threat to the reasonable public safety laws that protect our communities, including laws prohibiting gun possession by felons and domestic abusers, as well as background check requirements. As a child growing up in smalltown Iowa, I did not have concerns about gun and firearm safety. Much has changed since then, and sadly my children have grown up learning about gun violence as a common occurrence. We should be striving to make our communities saferthis amendment does NOT work toward that goal.

01-18-2021

Meredith Gall []

I urge you to vote against HSB 9. For the safety of our people, automatic weapons that can be used in mass shootings should not be a protected right. We have a right to bear arms in the US 2nd amendment and broadening that right is only dangerous.

01-18-2021

Julie Powell-Mohr []

I trust that you are horrified as I am by the gun violence that is sweeping our nation, but you are in a position to reduce the risk to our communities and to our children by passing legislation that will help stem that violence. Iowans are counting on you to have the courage to act. Adding strict scrutiny language to the Iowa Constitution could invalidate common sense handgun licensing laws and pave the way to overturning laws that protect our communities and our children from gun violence.In addition, strict scrutiny language would lead to costly court challenges of current laws and future legislative efforts to address gun violence by placing a higher standard on cases, as has already happened in Louisiana and Missouri.Please vote no on HSB9

01-18-2021

Rebecca Lyons [March For Our Lives Iowa]

I strongly urge the subcommittee to vote against the unpopular and dangerous HSB 9. Passing this amendment makes Iowans less safe in a time where the FBI has warned of further armed protests in Iowa after the January 6th attack on the Capitol. Similar strict scrutiny amendments have only harmed residents in other states that have passed these amendments. Gun deaths have dramatically risen in Missouri since they passed a similar amendment in 2014. A strict scrutiny amendment is also deeply unpopular with Iowans. Polling by Everytown shows that nearly 70% of Iowans do not support a strict scrutiny amendment. I we strongly urge the subcommittee to save the lives of countless Iowans by voting down HSB 9.

01-18-2021

Pauline Harrison []

I oppose HB9. The U.S. Constitution already provides for the right to keep and bear arms. It appears that the reason for this amendment is to make reasonable restrictions more difficult to put in place. Having recently witnessed the storming of the U.S. Capitol by a violent mob this is no time to pass this kind of amendment.

01-18-2021

Rebecca Truszkowski []

I am a lifetime Iowan, a wife and mother of two. I am writing in opposition to HSB9. Adding a "strict scrutiny" amendment to the Iowa constitution would undermine Iowas reasonable, popular public safety laws, and would be a truly extreme, farreaching change. The truth is that the language in this amendment poses a direct threat to Iowa public safety laws that protect our communities by keeping guns out of the hands of people who we all agree shouldnt have them.

01-18-2021

Joseph Truszkowski []

I am a resident of Johnson County and have practiced medicine in Iowa for over twenty years. While I support the right to bear arms, I firmly believe that we must have responsible gun safety laws in place. By adding a strict scrutiny amendment to the Iowa constitution, lawmakers would be forcing courts to use a type of judicial analysis likely to lead to them striking down Iowas public safety laws. I therefore oppose HSB9. Thank you for your consideration.

01-18-2021

Erica Fletcher [Moms Demand Action]

Chair Holt & Members of the SubcommitteeThank you for the opportunity to submit public comments as you consider HSB 9. I am writing urging you to reject this dangerous proposal. I am the mother of 2 young boys and a health care worker who has been watching the COVID pandemic play out first hand. When our legislature returned to session, I was watching for legislation to deal with the COVID pandemic and its economic ramifications. But instead of leading with legislation that would make our communities safer, legislative leaders have introduced this truly extreme, farreaching proposed change to our constitution. Iowa has a strong heritage of responsible gun ownership. Ive been a gun owner my entire life I grew up with guns, Im a twicedeployed Army veteran, and I own guns now. But this proposed constitutional amendment does not honor Iowas heritage of responsible gun ownership. Only three states have enacted strict scrutiny laws, and Iowa should not be the fourth. Under strict scrutiny courts could potentially eliminate laws that protect our communities like the law that prohibits convicted felons from having guns, and the background check requirements that ensure those prohibited purchasers cant legally purchase handguns in our state. I lived in Missouri for 10 years and watched as the gun violence there got worse and worse after they enacted a similar strict scrutiny constitutional amendment. I didnt decide to raise my boys in Iowa, hoping that it would become the next Missouri. I want a life free from gun violence for my children and know most Iowans feel the same. Please vote no on this extreme proposal.Erica FletcherJohnston, IA

01-19-2021

Brian Carter [Iowa Conference Church and Society, Legislative Advocacy]

The United Methodist Churches opposes this expansion of gun owner rightsbecause of the strict scrutiny language it also decreases the rights of Iowans to limit laws which would be common sense laws to protect human life. wE OPPOSE HSB 9. Some limits on gun possession would be good for everybody. But could be challenged in court because of strict scrutiny language. Persons suffering from depression, ptsd, or severe injury may not be thinking clearly and use a gun to harm themselves or others.This amendment does more harm than it does good. It is not needed and may require substantial resources to adjudicate common sense gun laws. We are not opposed to the right to bear arms. But this amendment doesn't speak to that. It is a snake trying to get into our constitution to create havoc and harm. We oppose HSB 9.

01-19-2021

Ruth Westfall []

I am opposed to a constitutional amendment that would restrict laws concerning guns. We need restriction on who can carry a firearm, when and where. In other words, sensible gun laws. I urge you to reject HSB 9.

01-19-2021

Brenda Schumann []

The Second amendment of the US Constitution applies to Iowa so I don't see the necessity of adding it to the Iowa constitution. There are more pressing issues during this pandemic that need to be dealt with. If there is strong feeling that a Second amendment is needed then please DO NOT include strict scrutiny. That clause could invalidate some of the laws that allow for safe gun ownership. Background checks might not be allowed or convicted felons might not be prohibited from owning guns. Thank you for your consideration,Brenda Schumann

01-19-2021

Robin Kline []

This is unnecessary legislation, recklessly endangering Iowans' lives by loosening Iowa's commonsense gun safety laws. The Second Amendment rights for Iowans are already protected by the US Constitution.

01-19-2021

Teresa Mulvihill []

As a teacher, I strongly oppose this bill which would allow guns to be brought into schools and other public places. After the horrific tragedy at Sandy Hook in Newtown, Connecticut, I cannot believe that anyone would support a bill that allows guns to be carried in places in our country where children could be murdered en masse. Common sense gun laws and regulations are called "common sense" for a reason. It makes sense to have limits on where guns can be carried (NOT in public places where children and others can be murdered), what type of guns can be purchased (NOT assault weapons which are only used to murder other human beings), and who can legally own a gun (NOT a convicted felon). We need common sense gun regulations to protect our children and all other people in the state of Iowa. The Right to Bear Arms should NEVER supersede the public right to safety.

01-19-2021

Teresa Mangum []

I strongly object to HSB 9. We need strict gun control laws in this country. We need commonsense gun reform legislation in Iowa and we need to uphold the States existing limits on gun rights (like the law that felons cannot have guns or that guns are not allowed in sensitive places like schools). States that have adopted strict scrutiny language have seen costly legal battles to preserve common sense gun laws, and in some cases prosecutors have even declined to enforce them. Gun deaths have increased dramatically in Missouri since its passage of a similar amendment in 2014.How many school shootings do we have to endure before legislators take responsibility? Please vote this amendment down and start working on serious gun control laws to protect Iowans.

01-19-2021

Connie Ryan [lnterfaith Alliance of Iowa Action Fund]

Interfaith Alliance of Iowa Action Fund is fervently opposed to HSB9 and the proposed constitutional amendment that would threaten the safety of our children and communities.As we have expressed over the last few years, we have no concern if the proposed amendment to Iowas constitution mirrored the Second Amendment to the US Constitution. Our concern and opposition is with the addition of strict scrutiny and the unreasonable bar it would set. Establishing strict scrutiny for all current and future laws would tip the scales of the court. It would make it more difficult to pass new commonsense gun safety laws. Additionally, it would pave the way to overturn current laws that serve our state well in protecting our communities and our children from gun violence.Adding gun rights with strict scrutiny to the Iowa Constitution would place all of Iowas commonsense gun safety laws and future legislation in danger of being struck down by a court, placing Iowans in harms way. Commonsense gun safety laws that could be impacted include:Prohibition of a felon to own or carry a gunBackground check requirements for handgunsProhibition to carry on school groundsRequired carry permits, including conceal carryAge limits to get a permit to carry a handgunTraining requirement for initial permit to carryInterfaith Alliance of Iowa Action Fund asks subcommittee members and all Iowa lawmakers to oppose HSB9.

01-19-2021

Kathleen Darling []

Im asking you to halt this legislation. To further loosen access to firearms would allow felons to weapons. Safe restrictions with background checks and schools off limits are reasonable restrictions. Stop this bill!

01-19-2021

Erin Howell-Gritsch []

We should be increasing restrictions on guns, not enacting legislation that allows anyone and everyone to carry. Please use common sense and do not proceed with HSB9. Why would you want to increase the likelihood of people getting killed?

01-19-2021

Heather Scoville []

As a school teacher, I am very disappointed in the legistlature's push to protect inanimate objects like guns more than our children. We need common sense gun reform, not freedom to do whatever you want with them. Watching the elementary children in our building cry during active shooter drills (which are a common and unfortunately necessary part of life nowadays because of bills like this one) is heartbreaking. I urge you to observe one of them one day to really see how you are affecting people's lives and mental health over weapons of death. The 2nd Amendment of the US Constitution does have a right to bear arms, but in a "Wellregulated militia", NOT in your basement or hoarding thousands of rounds of ammo or buying as many assault rifles as possible. I am not antigun. I am antigun regulation and that is exactly what this bill will do.

01-19-2021

Timothy Koon [Iowa County Democrats]

I want to voice my dissent for the proposed bill, HSB 9. It is my belief that the gun laws in Iowa are already too generous. Open carry, for example, is not compatible with a free functioning democracy. We have seen in recent history, in places like Michigan, that even lawmakers have felt their first amendment rights are jeopardized by others' second amendment zeal. You can't have legislators, or anyone else, having to do the bidding of someone with a gun to your back. We need the right to consider and pass common sense gun regulations without weapons legally brandished by 'protestors.' Please do not pass this bill! Thank you.

01-19-2021

Betsy Fickel []

It is important that Iowa follow the U.S. constitution and Bill of Rights that guarantees our inalienable rights by God to defend self, family, and property. As one that has received death threats and other vile threats by some animal zealots, it is extremely important that I be able to defend my life and personal well being if need be, long with my property rights. This should not even b a question f the rihts of the people.It is an understood there are concerns about access to arms by people that deal with mental issues. It is a horrible isue to cnstantly deal with. If one intends to follow through, they they will use other objects as weapons. One cannot ban everything. Criminals have weapons where there are bans. No amount of laws have yet to stop that. As the saying goes, "Where there's a will, there's a way."In view of the worldwide political climate, why should not people have means to defend self and family?I urge a do pass.

01-19-2021

Colleen Armstrong []

My name is Colleen Armstrong and I am writing in opposition to adding gun rights with strict scrutiny to the Iowa Constitution. It would place Iowans in harms way by putting all of Iowas commonsense gun safety laws and future legislation in danger of being struck down by a court. It is absurd to consider providing additional gun rights to individuals at the expense of those who who are at risk of greater harm; children, victims of domestic violence, innocent citizens. Do not risk weakening what little protections citizens have such as training requirements for permitting and carrying guns and background checks.

01-19-2021

Lindsay Maher []

In the event the Federal Government chooses to amend or abolish the second amendment to the US constitution we as Iowans must have our legal rights protected, as originally intended by the founding fathers, to keep our right to bear arms. These Natural rights supersede all positive rights enacted by legislatures in our state or federal government. Please pass this amendment to protect our rights.

01-19-2021

Rosemary Mabeus []

There should be no more relaxation of gun control rules in this state. The gun control rules in this state are already too lax! If you cant see the results of loose gun control rules in the riots at our nations capitol building a couple weeks ago, then you need to be voted out of office!

01-19-2021

Barbara Clem []

The right to keep and bear arms should be treated similarly to the right to drive a car, or sell insurance, or teach school. There are responsibilities and accountability required for each. Laws must provide for education, and certification for each. The change of inflicting harm to others, whether intentional or not, is great in each case, and must be recognized and accounted for. Gun owners who are already aware of the possibilities for misuse are not those who oppose regulations for firearms.

01-19-2021

John Grennan []

I am writing as a constituent who opposes to HSB 9. An amendment to the state constitution takes power away from state and county officials to adopt and revise gun laws that are appropriate for different communities and evolving circumstances.

01-19-2021

Jane Pohlson []

Stop trying to diminish women by taking away our rights! Stop jamming you pseudo Christian agenda down the throats of all Iowans!We do not want or need expanded gun rights!Expand funding to publics hools.Who are you cowards?

01-19-2021

Ella Daniels []

01-20-2021

Oliver Willett []

This bill is outrageous. I, and the majority of Americans, do not believe that the right to have a military weapon is more important than the right for us all to feel safe in our community. Guns belong in the military, not in communities.

01-21-2021

Jannelle McGee []

The term strict scrutiny is vague and meaningless. There is no reason to add this to the Iowa constitution regarding gun laws. Every change to the constitution should be done with strict scrutiny that is what I expect from my elected officials. I completely support the second amendment and peoples rights but I do NOT support baselessly adding language to out constitution to weaken the power of our elected officials.

01-18-2021

Claire Licht [Salutation*]

HSB 9 is very scary! Especially after all the shooting we've had in this country, and especially after the insurgency on Jan 6 at our Nation's capitol, we need sensible gun control. Not talking about getting rid of guns, but let's have sensible laws.

01-18-2021

Hannah Doerge []

While understanding the importance of the second amendment, this type of legislation will make it nearly impossible to pass reasonable gun laws to protect our communities. I find it highly ironic that we have another house study bill aimed at protecting unborn children, but this one will hinder efforts to protect living children when they go to school.

01-18-2021

Hannah Doerge []

01-18-2021

Claire Licht [Salutation*]

Women need to have control over their bodies I firmly believe that we need to protect a woman's right to an abortion. Abortions need to be decisions made by a woman and her doctor. We spend so much time and money on this issue and are so focused on the unborn fetus. As a child therapist for many years, we need to take better care of the children who are here too many children are food insecure, too many children live in high stress situations, too many children aren't given the important early childhood education that is so critical to the developing child. We need time and money spent to support parents. Please do not support HSB9

01-18-2021

Nick Bergus []

Representatives,I am writing to you today to oppose this proposed amendment to the Iowa Constitution, which exceeds the language of the Bill of Rights of the United States Constitution and would allow felons to carry weapons into our schools and prohibit other popular and widely accepted gun safety measures.

01-18-2021

Jacki Rand []

House Study Bill 9 seeking to amend the Iowa Constitution to strike down restrictions on personal gun rights matches in the extreme politics and actions of the guntoting Republicans who stormed the US Capitol intent on bringing harm to Democratic leaders. Is this the highest priority of the moment? You would think we weren't in the twin nightmares of the pandemic and extreme right organized violence against the United States. Shame on you. Stop clutching your pearls about your guns and focus on the needs of Iowans who are making so many sacrifices to get through these times.

01-18-2021

Sonja Spear []

We need to find a balance between the right to own a gun and public safety. Common sense says that guns have no place in schools, should not be in the hands of people convicted of violent crimes, and should not be allowed in places of worship. If HSB 9 makes it impossible to implement even these minor restrictions, it goes too far. Please vote for common sense and against this bill.

01-18-2021

Mary Updegraff [--None--]

This so Iowa. You're turning this over to vigilante justice, dangerous white supremacists, convicted felons,dangerous military style militias. You are so backward that's why there will always be a brain drain here. This insanity is just the beginning of the destruction of America. Look at the Iowans who went to destroy the capitol. You should take a count of the number of Republicans in the Iowa legislature who supported that insurrection and who favor this ridiculous gun law. Those of you including many legislators love Trump's idea of destroying our democracy and supporting Russia. This gun law will give free reign to shoot people who don't agree with these conspiracies and lies that have been spread for the last 4 years. Iowa nice is a joke. Iowa white supremacy should be your mantra.

01-18-2021

Maher Josephson [Citizens Not Afraid of Their Shadows]

This resident of Iowa and citizen of the USA stand in opposition to this constitutional amendment rendering life in this land a de facto fertile ground for slow burn civil war, and freeforall abuse of lethal weapons. Remember: The armed services where a soldier carries a lethal weapon is regulated much more than this amendment would allow. My smell test tells me this amendment is born by the gun lobby which seeks to cash in by bloodletting and destruction of life, a shameful immoral chapter in this peaceful state. Vote NO on this amendment.

01-18-2021

Lauren Darby []

I am a public school teacher who has had to go through annual training on active shooter events. It is terrifying to think that anything would be done that would make it more difficult to pass sensible gun legislation to protect our students and colleagues in what should be a place of growing and learning and joy from mass murders that we have seen all too often across the country, including at the University of Iowa. The strict scrutiny requirement is nearly impossible to clear and addressing a problem (it being too difficult to acquire or own firearms?) that doesn't even exist.

01-18-2021

James White []

AFTER THE EVENTS OF JANUARY 6 AND THE WEEKENDS FOLLOWING WE SURE DO NOT NEED ANY MORE WACKO'S CARRING GUNS OF ANY TYPE.PLEASE DO NOT MAKE EVEN MORE GUNS APPEAR ON OUR STREETS, IN OUR CAPITOLS, COURTHOUSES, SCHOOLS, PLAYGROUNDS, ETC., ETC. THE KID'S LIFE YOU SAVE MAY BE YOUR OWN OR YOUR GRANDCHILD'S.

01-18-2021

Laura Hessburg [Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence]

Representatives Holt, Klein, and WesselKroeschell:The Iowa Coalition Against Domestic Violence (ICADV) represents 22 crime victim service provider agencies across Iowa and the collective experience of agency staff who dedicate their lives to supporting victims of violent crime, specifically survivors of domestic violence and sexual abuse. Our direct service providers routinely witness the pain and suffering of crime victims, as well as their stunning resilience in surviving repeated violent acts (often over the course of months and years), inflicted on their minds and bodies by people they know and care about. ICADV urges you to oppose HSB 9, a constitutional amendment adding gun rights to the Iowa Constitution with a strict scrutiny judicial review standard. We believe this amendment undermines every existing or future sensible gun safety policy. Americas level of gun violence threatens public safety and we urge legislators to halt further efforts to advance this constitutional amendment proposal.As we become normalized to the regular pace of mass shootings and gun homicides in our communities, and come to grips with the reality that twothirds of all gun deaths are gun suicides, efforts to further expand access to guns present a false choice. Access to guns and gun rights for lawabiding citizens are not threatened in Iowa. You can be in favor of gun rights AND be in favor of reasonable policies to protect people from gun violence. Strict scrutiny is the most demanding judicial standard applied to constitutional cases. It requires judges to assume a challenged law is unconstitutional until the state proves otherwise. Only three states (Alabama, Louisiana, Missouri) include the extreme strict scrutiny language under consideration in Iowa. The experience in these states indicates a strict scrutiny standard undermines gun safety laws due to persistent legal challenges that burden the justice system and are paid for by taxpayers. Gun deaths by suicide, by intimate partners in homes, and in criminal acts occurring every day in communities across America are most common but mass shootings offer powerful illustration of the terror and toll of gun violence. The link between guns and domestic abuse homicide is so definitive that the role of domestic abusers in mass shootings is unsurprising.More men than women are killed by gun violence, except when it comes to domestic violence incidents where women and children are significantly and disproportionately terrorized and killed when guns are present. Nearly half of female firearm homicide victims were killed by an intimate partner. Access to a gun makes it five times more likely that an abusive partner will kill his female victim and when that happens guns are the cause of death for 70% of bystanders killed in domestic abuse incidents. And women in communities of color face a disproportionate share of the burden nationally, Black women are twice as likely to be fatally shot by an intimate partner compared to white women and younger Black women between ages 1834 are nearly three times more likely to be shot and killed by an intimate partner than are white women in same age group. Importantly, for every case of domestic abuse homicide, there are many more cases where women and children are held hostage and terrorized with guns. For example, the abusive partner who never fires the gun, but threatens her with it by pointing it at the children, waving it around during an argument, or shooting a family pet. Experience and research offer numerous examples of policies that work to protect people from gun violence and overwhelming majorities of Americans support these policies. We are moving in the opposite direction in Iowa. As a modern society we balance individual rights with public safety and community interest all the time. In the face of overwhelming evidence confirming Americas exceptional gun violence problem, gun rights should be no exception. The gun rights constitutional amendment proposal with strict scrutiny language advancing in Iowa would undermine all efforts to enact sensible restrictions on firearms access and could open the door for current gun safety laws to be challenged. Please oppose HSB 9.

Attachment

01-18-2021

Traci Kennedy [Moms Demand Action]

Chair Holt & Members of the SubcommitteeThank you for accepting public comments as you consider HSB 9. Im writing to you today as a mom of two young children and a gun owner to express my opposition to this proposal.My growing family moved to Iowa because we felt our values would be better represented than in our former home in Missouri. Like many Iowans, I want to do all I can to keep my family safe, which is why Im deeply concerned that instead of pursuing common sense solutions to gun violence, the committee is considering an extreme attempt to amend the Iowa constitution and threaten our bedrock public safety laws. . The overwhelming number of Iowans, your constituents, support commonsense public safety laws, like the background check requirement for handgun sales. Please vote no on this radical and unnecessary strict scrutiny measure that would threaten the public safety laws that keep our communities safeTraci KennedyWest Des Moines IA

Attachment