Meeting Public Comments
Subcommittee meeting and times are as follows:
A bill for an act relating to the revocation or denial of educator licenses and certificates for publicly celebrating assassinations or acts of politically motivated violence, and including effective date and retroactive applicability provisions.(See HF 2512.)
Subcommittee members: Stone-CH, Behn, Levin
Date: Wednesday, February 11, 2026
Time: 12:15 PM - 12:30 PM
Location: House Lounge
Names and comments are public records. Remaining information is considered a confidential record.
Comments Submitted:
02-09-2026
Sandy Wilson [Citizen Engagement]
Citizen Engagement declares IN FAVOR of HSB 682. Please move the bill.
02-09-2026
Teresa Wellman
I am vehemently OPPOSED to this bill. Please vote NO. This bill is performative and has no merit. It would immediately be challenged in the courts under the First Amendment, subsequently costing IA taxpayers millions to defend it only to lose. This bill does nothing to improve our water quality, fund our public schools, or improve our economy. Please stop with this RW nonsense.
02-09-2026
Brett Snyder
The loud minority does a good job being just that. LOUD. But lets remember that although loud, they are in fact the minority and we need cooler heads to prevail and speak for the majority. Obviously teachers do not need to comment on assassinations in an approval tone. Those conversations can be had at home with their families.
02-09-2026
Larissa Boeck
OPPOSE. We literally have a teacher shortage in Iowa. Stop trying to ruin our state and waste what precious little legislative time we have making up bogus laws.
02-11-2026
Grace Rogers
AGAINST. Please vote NO on HSB 682. The language in this bill is vague enough that the definition of "celebration" will be completely subjective to the party in power. It's very clear by the mention of Carlie Kirk in the bill text that you are targeting the teachers who made comments about his death on their personal social media pages. Your shameless targeting of anyone who doesn't look or think like you is just that, shameful. Do better for Iowans. VOTE NO.
02-11-2026
Alyssa Gifford
Oppose. Could this be more vague? Is everyone that mildy mentioned they approved of the Jan 6th insurrection on facebook going to lose the licenses? Or approval of any other event, of which there seem to be more and more of every day? We wont have any educators left and we certainly wont get more if they feel like they have to selfcensor at all times online.
02-11-2026
Jonathan Danker
This bill is very vague and could make a lot of mistakes. Thats why I OPPOSED HSB 682. It needs better wording.
02-11-2026
Katie Smith
I oppose this bill and encourage others to oppose this as well. This is such a waste of time and merely virtue signaling to your base...Please spend your time and efforts focusing on topics that would actually benefit residents of Iowa.
02-11-2026
David Anderson
As currently written, this bill is at best performative obnoxiousness. You either need to strike all references to Charles J. Kirk, or, at each mention, add the names Renee Good and Alex Pretti.
02-11-2026
Pamela O'Keefe
I am opposed to free speech restrictions and adamantly opposed to the retroactive nature of this bill in particular.
02-11-2026
Jennifer Tigges
Please vote no. We do not need to limit free speech by anyone.
Permanent Link