Meeting Public Comments
Subcommittee meeting and times are as follows:
Attendance at subcommittee meetings by lobbyists and the public is via zoom or in-person. See agenda for zoom details. Only authenticated users are permitted access.
A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution of the State of Iowa prohibiting the power of judicial review.
Subcommittee members: Schultz-CH, Blake, Rozenboom
Date: Tuesday, January 27, 2026
Time: 11:00 AM - 11:30 AM
Location: Senate Lounge
Comments Submitted:
The purpose of comments is to provide information to members of the subcommittee.
Names and comments are public records. Remaining information is considered a confidential record.
01-26-2026
Mary Kae Hanson
What are you people thinking!? Do you understand the concept of separation of powers and checks and balances? This is one of your worst ideas yet, and not worth your time considering. Please focus on solving real problems, like properly funding our judicial system and our public schools, and protecting us from federal overreach.
01-26-2026
Kathy Johnson
To the Honorable Members of the Legislative Body,I strongly urge a "no" vote on the bill that seeks to mandate state law enforcement cooperation with federal immigration and customs enforcement. This legislation is a clear overreach of federal authority and an infringement on the sovereignty of our state.It has come to my attention that the Department of Justice (DOJ) issued a "hostage note" to the state of Minnesota, threatening to withdraw federal immigration enforcement if the state did not comply with certain demands. This is a disturbing example of the coercive tactics employed by the federal government to achieve its immigration agenda.Furthermore, I am writing to you today in the wake of the horrific murder of Alex Pretti, an emergency room nurse at the VA. This senseless tragedy is a stark reminder of the devastating consequences of the federal government's failed immigration policies. As a nurse, Alex Pretti dedicated his life to caring for others, and his untimely death is a tragedy that could have been prevented if our immigration laws were enforced more effectively.In light of these events, I am compelled to speak out against this bill. The federal government's heavyhanded approach to immigration enforcement is not only an overreach of its authority but also a threat to public safety and the wellbeing of our citizens. I urge you to reject this bill and instead focus on building trust between law enforcement and the communities they serve.
01-26-2026
Jane Robinette
I oppose SJR 2002. Judicial review has been foundational to our system of government nationally and in Iowa for many, many years. We have no reason to get rid of these checks and balances now. Legislatures and governors don't always get it right. Courts should be able to review the constitutionality of the other branches' actions. This bill makes the legislature look silly and smallminded. Vote NO on SJR 2002.
01-27-2026
Nancy Dugan [Select your title]
This legislature seeks to remove the power of judicial review to ensure that laws you enact are consistent with the Constitution: https://www.legis.iowa.gov/legislation/BillBook?ga=91&ba=SJR2002. In my opinion, you introduce this legislation while simultaneously taking a torch to the Constitution. You have also introduced Senate File 2039: https://www.legis.iowa.gov/legislation/BillBook?ga=91&ba=sf%202039 In my opinion, Senate File 2039 violates Article III, Section 1 of the Iowa Constitution (separation of powers). You may want to change it, but I believe it would require a Constitutional amendment, which to the best of my knowledge you have not proposed. Iowa Supreme Court Justice May also writes that the separation of powers is inherently a part of our U.S. constitution. Iowa Supreme Court Justice David May: https://iowaappeals.com/uncategorized/iowasupremecourtjusticedavidmaydiscussesseparationofpowersinjudicialbranchpodcastinterview/. Our Constitution takes this notion a step further by making the separation of powers explicit. Article III, Section 1 says that the powers of government shall be divided into the legislative and the executive and the judicial. And, then again, it says that no person charged with exercising the powers belonging to one shall exercise powers of another unless its expressly directed or permitted in the Constitution. In my opinion, this legislative body is in a constitutional crisis of its own making. You are harming the people, and the constitutions, you vowed to protect. Neither HJR 2002 nor Senate File 2039 should advance.
01-27-2026
Tamara Kelley
Absolutely no. Can't believe how out of touch this proposal is with the times we are in right now.
01-27-2026
Mary Wolfe
Maybe just stop passing unconstitutional bills? Instead of attempting to amend our state constitution for the sole purpose of endowing the Iowa legislature with the ability/authority to pass unconstitutional bills w impunity? Ugh. (Note that I'm posting this comment while on my morning break from my govt job, using my personal phone)
01-27-2026
Carl Olsen
I'm against this proposal. If the intent is to limit courts to cases and parties before the court, this amendment does not clearly say that. If the idea is to prevent courts from making universal rulings that apply to persons who are not parties to a case, this amendment does not clearly say that.
Permanent Link