Meeting Public Comments
Subcommittee meeting and times are as follows:
Attendance at subcommittee meetings by lobbyists and the public is via zoom or in-person. See agenda for zoom details. Only authenticated users are permitted access.
A bill for an act providing for general education requirements for undergraduate students at regents institutions and including applicability provisions. (Formerly HSB 63.)
Subcommittee members: Taylor-CH, Garrett, Quirmbach
Date: Wednesday, April 2, 2025
Time: 2:00 PM - 2:30 PM
Location: Room 217 Conference Room
Comments Submitted:
The purpose of comments is to provide information to members of the subcommittee.
Names and comments are public records. Remaining information is considered a confidential record.
04-01-2025
Grace Rogers
Vote NO to HF 401! You advertise this bill as "driving consistency" while sneaking in requirements that prohibit learning about topics and parts of our history that make you UNCOMFY. According to the bill, these general education courses that you want to standardize cannot distort significant historical events or include any curriculum or other material that teaches identity politics or is based on theories that systemic racism, sexism, oppression, or privilege are inherent in the institutions of the United States of America or the state of Iowa. Iowa students deserve the ability to critically think about our history so that they do not repeat the worst parts. Unless that is what you want?? IA Republicans are despicable and disappointing. DO BETTER!!
04-01-2025
Stacy Volmer
I strongly urge you to reject House File 401, a dangerous overreach that threatens academic freedom, burdens students, and injects political control into Iowas higher education system. This bill imposes rigid, statemandated general education requirements that strip universities of the flexibility needed to design curricula that best serve their students. By forcing unnecessary coursework and capping credit hours arbitrarily, HF 401 will delay graduation, increase tuition costs, and create obstacles for students trying to transfer creditsplacing an even heavier financial strain on Iowas families.Beyond its logistical and financial burdens, this bill takes direct aim at academic freedom by censoring discussions on systemic racism, sexism, and oppression. Legislators should not be in the business of dictating what historical truths can or cannot be taught. HF 401 silences important perspectives, weakens students critical thinking skills, and undermines the very purpose of higher educationto challenge, inspire, and prepare students for a complex world.Additionally, the bills requirement that a Center for Intellectual Freedom approve certain courses is nothing more than a mechanism for political oversight of higher education. Rather than protecting intellectual diversity, this center would serve as a gatekeeper, allowing only stateapproved narratives to be taught while suppressing viewpoints that do not align with a particular ideology. This is government overreach at its worstmicromanaging university curricula and threatening the independence of faculty and institutions. Education should be driven by expertise and academic inquiry, not political agendas.This bill is not about improving education; it is about control. It prioritizes ideological oversight over student success, making degrees more expensive, less relevant, and more difficult to obtain. Iowas universities should be places of learning, not battlegrounds for governmentimposed narratives. I urge you to stand for students, academic integrity, and true intellectual freedom by voting NO on HF 401.
04-01-2025
Kathy Hilliard [Iowa State University]
Please consider carefully the implications of this bill and do not recommend its passage. I have taught American history at Iowa State since 2008. The views expressed here are my own. I deeply appreciate the legislature's emphasis on the importance of history in a comprehensive university education. Certainly, our students should learn more history! Yet I worry about the unforeseen consequences of this intrusion into curriculum development and course content. I'm particularly concerned about vague language in Section 4. I have no intention of "distorting significant historical events," as that is a gross violation of integrity and my training as a professional historian and teacher. Nor do I allow any particular theory to guide my teaching. As someone who teaches the era from the nation's founding through the Civil War and Reconstruction, however, I can't help but wonder how I can do my job without fear of punishment. Any student of history knows that interpretations of the past change over time as new sources and perspectives are uncovered. Scholars, students, writers, and enthusiasts debate history constantly. Go to Amazon and see how many thousands of books have been written on the Civil War, for example. We weigh sources and think carefully about context, especially on challenging topics like slavery, a racebased system of oppression that was codified in the Constitution via the 3/5 Compromise. We seek to understand not just the "what," but the "how" and the "why" of slavery's development, its eventual dissolution via war, and its legacy in the South and beyond. While I appreciate the crucial nod to academic freedom in this bill, I'm left wondering whether my triedandtrue pedagogy will run afoul of this proposed legislation. Who gets to decide what a violation looks like, and on what basis? ISU, UNI, and UI have taken care to hire experts in our fields. Please let us do our jobs. We care about our students, and we follow a professional code of conduct. Trust us to do our work with integrity.
04-01-2025
Benjamin Larson [Nebraska Cardiac Care]
This bill should not simply be rejected outright, but should also be openly tossed into the trash. Claiming that the united states which was founded with slavery legal and women unable to vote has not participated in this, calling it "identity politics", and attempting to strangle a teacher's ability to teach our history is pathetic in the extreme and is merely trying to erase history.
04-01-2025
Rebekah Jacobs
Please vote Opposed to HF 401.
04-02-2025
Pamela McDonald
Oppose HF 401. This is an example of government overreach. Politicians have no place imposing their will on professionals who actually know what they're doing.
04-02-2025
Shannon Wilson
Vote NO! The vague language in this document threatens the ability for teachers to have critical discussions with students about history. History is messy and can be uncomfortable, that is why we need to talk about it.
Permanent Link