Meeting Public Comments

Subcommittee meeting and times are as follows:

A bill for an act modifying provisions related to public libraries that are eligible to receive state assistance under the enrich Iowa program. (See HF 880.) Effective date: 01/01/2027.

Subcommittee members: Hayes-CH, Kniff McCulla, Matson

Date: Monday, February 24, 2025

Time: 12:30 PM - 1:00 PM

Location: RM 19

Names and comments are public records. Remaining information is considered a confidential record.

Comments Submitted:

02-20-2025

Jordyn Moore

I urge you to vote NO on this bill that seeks to strip funding from local, public libraries. Iowa has one of the most robust public library systems in the country, and this bill is another attempt to undercut them based on ideological differences, when public libraries were specifically create space for people to make their own determinations and seek information on all legal topics. This is an attack on the voter base to continue to strip services to make their daily lives more difficult and education more difficult to keep them misinformed. Iowans love and need their public libraries, especially as other services continue to receive less funding and costs skyrocket. The most common used services are printing, computer use to apply for benefits, and programming, and taxpayers and your constituents will suffer, particularly young and elderly. Legislators are proposing bills based on ideological differences when issues are not occurring on a large enough scale to necessitate statewide intervention. This is a gross overstep from the party that claims to be small government. Vote NO, and work better to take care of those who pay and vote for you.

02-20-2025

Sam B

Vote no on SF 284! Taking provisions away from public libraries would be a detriment to everyone who uses a library in more ways than you'd think! Libraries exist to serve everyone in every community with different values and beliefs. Stripping them of already low funds would be a disservice to the entire state! Libraries were created to create space for people to make their own informed decisions and opinions. Stop harming your voter base by removing services that help us in our daily lives and help us continue to educate ourselves long past K12. Libraries have never been more popular, it's gross that laws like these are coming under fire by people who probably don't even see how good libraries are for communities and for people of ALL walks of life. This will harm those needing printing services, computers to apply for benefits, programming for early childhood literacy, tutoring help, repairs on household items, social book clubs (especially for the elderly), and so much more. There's no reason to go after libraries the way this legislation is! It's wild that all these antilibrary bills are coming from the party that claims to be for small government. Support public libraries and your constituents quality of life! Vote no to SF 284!

02-20-2025

Sam Helmick

strongly oppose the proposed legislation that would disqualify libraries from membership in the Association of Small and Rural Libraries, the Iowa Library Association, or the American Library Association, and other networks that support ongoing skill building and support which directly impacts the public. This bill not only undermines the collaborative efforts vital for the development and support of libraries but also infringes on First Amendment rights, particularly the freedom of association.By modifying the definition of "eligible public library" to exclude those that are duespaying members of national or state nonprofit organizations, this legislation seeks to limit libraries' ability to connect with essential resources, education, and support networks. Libraries play a crucial role in fostering community engagement and access to information, and they should not be penalized for participating in professional organizations that enhance their capabilities.Restricting library memberships in this manner is an alarming move that restricts not only their operational efficacy but also their fundamental rights. The freedom to associate with organizations that advocate for better library services is a cornerstone of democratic engagement. I urge lawmakers to reconsider this bill and to protect the vital role that libraries play in our communities and in the broader context of free speech and association.

02-20-2025

Emma Stoffer

This bill targets nonprofit organizations that exist to support all libraries. While advocacy efforts are an important aspect of these organizations, to reduce their work to that single action is an egregious mischaracterization of their purpose. The American Library Association, the American Association of Law Libraries, the American Association of School Libraries, the American Theological Library Association, the Art Libraries Society of North America, the Association of College and Research Libraries, the Association of Research Libraries, the Library Information Technology Association, the Medical Library Association, the Music Library Association, the Public Library Association, the Association for Library Service to Children, the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services, the Special Libraries Association, the Young Adult Library Services Association, the Reference and User Services Association, and of course the Iowa Library Association among so many others, are organizations that provide professional guidance, resources, and publications that support all librarians and library users. Public libraries and public librarians in Iowa have the right to seek professional development without putting their funding in jeopardy. Professionals in other fields, private and public, are encouraged to pursue opportunities that strengthen their careers and allow them to network with their colleagues. Over 850 municipalities in Iowa are members of the Iowa League of Cities, an organization that provides professional guidance, resources, and publications that support city leaders. Additionally, they provide advocacy tools. Iowa library professionals deserve access to professional development opportunities. Iowa library professionals deserve access to networking opportunities. Iowa library professionals deserve access to guidance from leaders in their field. Iowa library professionals deserve access to resources and publications from experts in their field. Iowa library professionals deserve to have people advocating for them. I do not support HF 284.

02-20-2025

Marilyn Moser

Please vote no on this bill. Our libraries provide essential services to so many in our communities. I am a small town librarian and I can assure you that we are not pushing obscene books at your children and grandchildren.

02-20-2025

Susan Craig

Vote no! This small amount of money ensures that Iowans who live in a participating community can use the library in another community at no charge, perhaps where they work, where their grandchildren are, where their children go to school. To demand public libraries not support groups that advocate for them, is like telling farmers if they take state funds they cant belong to agriculture advocacy organizations. This is extreme censorship and a democratic country would not support it.

02-20-2025

Theo Prineas

Vote no! Libraries make Iowa communities happier, more productive, and more resilient. Libraries drive economic growth through programs that assist with job seekers; by connecting small businesses with the resources they need; and by enabling lifelong learning for Iowans to develop new skills. Engaging with a modern economy requires access to digital services, which libraries provide to countless Iowans who don't have Internet or computer access at home. Libraries bring these services together in one place, allowing communities to grow and thrive in the best times, and coordinate and rebuild in hard times. We need to fund libraries because they provide these benefits.

02-20-2025

Isaiah Greimann

As a nursing student who is currently in nursing school, I can never describe how amazing my public library has been to me and my studies. The Library has given me a nice and peaceful place to study and it also afforded me printing services, free Internet, and resource materials if needed. The public library has been so indispensable to myself and the community! Please vote no!

02-20-2025

Suzanne Miller

The Iowa Library Association has always provided many benefits to its members. It provides grants, professional development opportunities, and improved services. Membership should be encouraged and not penalized by denying Enrich Iowa Funds to these libraries. Please VOTE NO!

02-20-2025

Kim Kietzman

The State pays into lobbying associations (National Governor's Association is one) to make their voice heard. You aren't giving that up. Why should institutions smaller, with less political access, be punished financially for doing the same?

02-21-2025

Julia Bauder

Please vote no. Professional organizations such as the Association for Small and Rural Libraries, the Iowa Library Association, and the Association for Library Service to Children provide invaluable professional development opportunities for Iowa's librarians. Making it more difficult for Iowa libraries to join these organizations and for Iowa librarians to learn from their programming will harm the quality of library services in Iowa.

02-21-2025

Christine Barth [Scott County Library System]

Advocacy is a form of free speech and many organizations exist to concisely represent views of their members and member organizations. Please vote no to this bill, which seeks to use threats to stifle free speech.

02-21-2025

Dorothy White

Please vote no against this bill. You cannot penalize libraries for being a part of professional associations that bring so much enrichment and education, not to mention funding, to libraries all across the state. These associations offer grant opportunities and professional development to libraries and library workers that improve services provided to the public. This would be like penalizing a doctor for being a part of the Iowa Medical Society or the American Medical Association; or penalizing a hospital for being a part of the Iowa Hospital Association.

02-21-2025

Chris Hubbs

Please vote NO on HF 284. Libraries are precious public resources for our communities. They provide services that go far beyond just loaning out books. Our library also has a food bank, community space, free access to the internet for those who need it, and is an emergency warming shelter during cold weather. Libraries need MORE funding, not less funding. Please support our public libraries.

02-21-2025

Sherrianne noyes Noyes

You should shut down this bill so many people rely on the library for an outlet for their creativity a way for kids who cant afford new books all the time to read or learn new things due to their many classes and visits from museums they deserve all they get from the state and more

02-21-2025

Jeff Collins

I respectfully urge you to vote NO on this bill. It would be detrimental to restrict membership in support organizations that offer valuable opportunities for grant funding and professional development. It is nonsensical to target library associations what about professional associations that support their professionals, like doctors and other government workers?

02-21-2025

Taylor Erickson

VOTE NO!I oppose HF 284 because it unfairly punishes public libraries for being members of certain organizations. Libraries join these groups to better serve our communities, share resources, and stay updated on best practices. Cutting their funding over this would hurt their ability to provide the books, programs, and services we all rely on. Libraries should be supported, not restricted, for doing whats best for their patrons. I urge you to vote against SF 238 and keep our libraries strong.

02-21-2025

Gina Schlesselman-Tarango

Vote No!This legislation would impact the ability of libraries across the state to benefit from professional organizations such as the Iowa Library Association, Association of Small and Rural Libraries, Medical Library Association, American Association of Law Libraries, Association of Research Libraries, Chief Operating Officers of State Library Associations, American Theological Library Association, and American Library Association. These professional associations help bring millions of dollars in library aid to Iowa from the federal government, improving services provided to the public. This is particularly necessary in rural communities where other opportunities and services may be lacking.

02-21-2025

Jodie Morin

Public librarians in Iowa need and rely on their professional organizations. We are blessed in this state with LOTS of public libraries, many in small towns that have little else to offer their citizens. The public library serves not only as an educational center, but also an entertainment and social center. These libraries are often staffed by just one or two people. The professional organizations this legislation targets provides education and networking opportunities for the library staff, not a political agenda as this legislation seems to suppose. Denying funding to libraries and library staff who seek to better themselves professionally is unfair and shortsighted. I urge you to consider how professional organization that you might belong to help you do your jobs. Vote no on HF 284.

02-21-2025

Lexie Reiling

Please vote no on this bill. If it passed, our libraries would lose funds that provide materials and services to the public, in addition to the loss of opportunities for training and professional development that help ensure our libraries are providing the best possible resources for Iowans.

02-21-2025

Rachel McKenny

Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. This bill would harm our local libraries, but it would also violate the principle of free association. I'm proud to be an American, and those rights deserve to be protected. I'm against this bill!

02-21-2025

Michelle Andersen

Please vote no on this proposal. Every penny of library funding is put to good use and it seems irresponsible to discourage professional librarians from joining their professional organizations that help keep them informed of happenings in their field.

02-21-2025

Mary Henson

Please vote No on this bill to reduce funding from local public Iowa libraries. Protect the public's right to access and assess objective information. I am a senior citizen and am old enough to remember when libraries were the best source of objective information. Now that the internet is filled with mis, dis and questionable information while new media contradict one another, libraries are once again the best way to access and assess objective information. As a cancer patient, I have used the library as a resource for the best decisions regarding recuperation, lifestyle changes to reduce my chances of cancerrecurrances. The libray has helped me find reliable medical advice, stress reductionIon, diet and even exercise. Library funding is especially important to senior citizens with limited budgets. Please protect Iowa's excellent libraries by voting No to reducing library funding.

02-21-2025

Glenda Mulder

I oppose this bill because legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. It also violates the principle of free association.These associations are vital to librarians because they offer grant opportunities and professional development to improve services provided to the public.

02-21-2025

Honey Bedell

HF 284 would penalize all Iowans by restricting already tight funding for public libraries. The legality of this move is questionable, as the measure would violate Iowa librarians' right to free association and free speech. It would also significantly reduce opportunities for professional development for librarians, which ultimately affects all of us and leads to less qualified, knowledgeable professionals. Many taxpayerfunded organizations are members of associations that have advocacy as only one of their many functions and benefits to members. Penalizing Iowa libraries for belonging to an organization that furthers the profession is simpley wrong. Please vote no.

02-21-2025

Jillian Rutledge

Please vote NO on HF284. Libraries provide essential services to their communities and many have already suffered the unintended consequences of funding loss because of HF718. Further cuts to funding will harm Iowans who use their libraries to access essential information, apply for jobs, attend programs, and participate in civic engagement. There were 12 MILLION visits to Iowa public libraries each year. This bill is an attack on Iowans' Constitutional Rights and infringes their freedom to assemble.

02-21-2025

Jamie Noack

I urge you to vote no on HF284. Libraries make Iowa communities happier, more productive, and more resilient. Libraries drive economic growth through programs that assist with job seekers; by connecting small businesses with the resources they need; and by enabling lifelong learning for Iowans to develop new skills. This bill targets nonprofit organizations that exist to support all libraries. While advocacy efforts are an important aspect of these organizations, to reduce their work to that single action is an egregious mischaracterization of their purpose. The American Library Association, the American Association of School Libraries, and the Iowa Library Association among so many others, are organizations that provide professional guidance, resources, and publications that support all librarians and library users. Public libraries and public librarians in Iowa have the right to seek professional development without putting their funding in jeopardy. Professionals in other fields, private and public, are encouraged to pursue opportunities that strengthen their careers and allow them to network with their colleagues. Over 850 municipalities in Iowa are members of the Iowa League of Cities, an organization that provides professional guidance, resources, and publications that support city leaders. Additionally, they provide advocacy tools. Iowa library professionals deserve access to professional development opportunities. Iowa library professionals deserve access to networking opportunities. Iowa library professionals deserve access to guidance from leaders in their field. Iowa library professionals deserve access to resources and publications from experts in their field. Iowa library professionals deserve to have people advocating for them. I do not support HF 284.

02-21-2025

Malavika Shrikhande

It is unfair to punish public libraries for being members of professional organizations. This legislation would impact the ability of libraries across the state to benefit from professional organizations for e.g. Iowa Library Association, Association of Small and Rural Libraries, American Theological Library Association, American Library Association. They offer grant opportunities and professional development to libraries and library workers and improve services provided to the public. Penalizing individuals or institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought, inquiry, and the collective improvement of our society. Please vote No to HF284.

02-21-2025

Jennifer Smith

Please vote NO. Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. It violates the principle of free association, a cherished and protected right in our democracy. These associations offer grant opportunities and professional development to libraries and library workers and improve services provided to the public. Penalizing individuals or institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought, inquiry, and the collective improvement of our society.

02-21-2025

Anne Mangano

Please vote no. Enrich Iowa helps rural Iowans and their public libraries serve them. If the choice is to not participate in professional organizations, Iowa librarians will no longer share best practices and evolve their library services to better meet the needs of their communities, which is gained through organizations like the American Library Association, the Iowa Library Association, and the Association of Rural and Small Libraries.

02-21-2025

Charlotte Brookins

I strongly urge you to vote no on this bill. I see each day the work that public libraries do to enrich their communities, provide a place of resilience, and consistently support their patrons. Passing this bill would be stripping these nonprofit organizations of their ability to serve the public, which would not only be detrimental to the countless people benefitting from them, but would also be violating a library's right to free association. Please, vote no!

02-21-2025

Lisa Johnson

02-21-2025

Wendy Doyel

I urge you to vote no on this bill! To threaten library funding in this way is just wrong, libraries aren't funded adequately enough as it is. Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. It violates the principle of free association, a cherished and protected right in our democracy.

02-21-2025

MARGARET HOEL

VOTE NO ON HF284.These associations offer grant opportunities and professional development to libraries and library workers and improve services provided to the public. Penalizing individuals or institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought, inquiry, and the collective improvement of our society.

02-21-2025

Michele Patrick

Please vote no on HF 284. Penalizing individuals or institutions for participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought, inquiry, and the collective improvement of our society.

02-21-2025

Chris Stoner

Please vote no on HF 284. By removing Enrich Iowa funding eligibility for libraries that are members of professional organizations like the Iowa Library Association, the Association of Rural and Small Libraries, and the American Library Association, the state would be hamstringing public libraries by limiting their connections to external resources and professional development. Forcing libraries to choose between receiving vital state funding and having access to professional networks, resources, and peer connections is a loselose proposition that will weaken the efficacy of the public services Iowa libraries provide.

02-21-2025

Claire Matthews

Please vote NO on HF 284.Participation in a professional organization is a constitutional right in the US. Libraries large and small depend on organizational enrollments to ensure high quality service to local taxpaying communities. Removing funding to Enrich Iowa grants due to a membership is unconstitutional and denies small and rural communities funding that is essential to providing excellent service for local patrons.

02-21-2025

Jessica LInk

Please vote no on HF 284. Strong libraries need both critical funding and professional support, connections, and development opportunities for their dedicated staff. This bill will harm libraries in our state and the people they serve. This will harm Iowans.

02-21-2025

Sue Woody

Please vote NO! Professional associations offer our staff the opportunity to meet with peers and mentors through professional development training and workshops. They explore and present new ideas throughout the state to ensure quality programming and timely, relevant services to offer our communities.

02-21-2025

Stacy Goodhue

Please vote no on HF 284. With funds already low and libraries under attack, it does not make sense to put in place measures that would make it even harder for libraries to get funding. Enrich Iowa funds help citizens from all parts of the State access books through Interlibrary Loan. If the Enrich Iowa funds are gone your local library will lose services. These bills are extremely unpopular with the public! I ask that you listen to the voters and vote no!

02-21-2025

Tory Breise

Never in the history of the world have the people banning books been the good guys. Such an action will do no more than to place Iowa firmly on the wrong side of history. Knowledge is power and this is an attack on our collective knowledge, our rights and our freedoms. This is fundamentally antiAmerican and a betrayal of everything that is great about our country and our people.

02-21-2025

Scott Brown

I urge you to vote no on this proposed bill. It appears to me to be another try by the "book burners" in Pella and other misguided communities to penalize our wonderful public libraries. Iowa has some of the best if not the best public library system in the US why spend time and effort trying to mess with something that is not broken, but is driven by misguided partisan politics.

02-21-2025

Molly Angstman

Please vote NO on this bill. It is an unnecessary overstep. Support organizations provide valuable and costsaving opportunities for libraries. Why on earth would you get rid of that access? Libraries are so important to so many people and deserve more resources to help them do that.

02-21-2025

Natalie Osborn

Vote NO! This is an overstep. Libraries should have open & accessible materials for all. Adults are frequent users of the library & the resources libraries offer adults & youth should not be censored. This decision, to check out or avoid obscene materials should be left for families & individuals to decide, NOT the government. Where would it end? This is an infringement on our freedom.

02-21-2025

Dana Hinders

Libraries are more than just booksthey provide essential services like access to computers for job applications and benefits, early childhood literacy programs, tutoring, printing services, social book clubs (especially for seniors), household repair workshops, and so much more. Removing these resources hurts your own constituents and limits opportunities for lifelong learning.Its outrageous that librariesone of the most widely used and beloved public institutionsare under attack by lawmakers who may not even recognize their immense value. Public libraries empower individuals to make informed decisions and continue their education long past K12. Instead of gutting them, we should be supporting them.

02-21-2025

Carol Sensor

Vote No on this bill because legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. It violates the principle of free association, a cherished and protected right in our democracy. This legislation would impact the ability of libraries across the state to benefit from professional organizations such as the Iowa Library Association, Association of Small and Rural Libraries, Medical Library Association, American Association of Law Libraries, Association of Research Libraries, Chief Operating Officers of State Library Associations, American Theological Library Association, and American Library Association. These professional associations help bring millions of dollars in library aid to Iowa from the federal government. These associations offer grant opportunities and professional development to libraries and library workers and improve services provided to the public. Penalizing individuals or institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought, inquiry, and the collective improvement of our society.Agaiin, vote NO.

02-22-2025

Jan Netolicky

As a former educator, a lifelong reader, and a passionate advocate for public libraries, I strongly urge you to vote NO on HF 284 and its companion bill SF238. Libraries serve our communities in myriad ways. Our Cedar Rapids Public Library is instrumental in promoting literacy through programs like the Dolly Parton Imagination Library which provides free books to preschool children. The library is a hub for community outreach with programming and education intended to benefit all citizens. My understanding is this bill would eliminate funding based upon affiliation with associations such the American Library Association, Association of Small & Rural Libraries, Medical Library Association, American Association of Law Libraries, Chief Operating Officers of State Library Associations, American Theological Library Association, and the Iowa Library Association. Should HF284 and its companion bill SF238 pass, the prospects for local libraries are chilling and would mean the loss of millions of dollars in library funding to Iowa from the federal government. Respectfully, HF284 and SF238 should not be advanced. Please vote NO.

02-22-2025

Karen Lehmann

Vote no. Ability to join organizations that help libraries function is critical to their effectiveness. Doctors collaborate, lawyers work together: so should librarians. It Is ridiculous, ignorant and insulting that this is even being proposed.

02-22-2025

Molly Altorfer

I urge you to vote NO on this bill. Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional; it violates the principle of free association. This bill removes funding from libraries who are members of the American Library Association, Association of Small & Rural Libraries, Medical Library Association, American Association of Law Libraries, Chief Operating Officers of State Library Associations, American Theological Library Association, and the Iowa Library Association. These associations help bring millions of dollars in library funding to Iowa from the federal government. They are also the professional associations that libraries and their staff rely on for professional development and peer collaboration.Please vote no on HF284.

02-22-2025

Kristie VanGorkom

PLEASE vote NO on this bill! Libraries are public institutions, which should be allowed to serve the entire public, and educate and advocate on our behalf.Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional; it violates the principle of free association. This bill removes funding from libraries who are members of the American Library Association, Association of Small & Rural Libraries, Medical Library Association, American Association of Law Libraries, Chief Operating Officers of State Library Associations, American Theological Library Association, and the Iowa Library Association. These associations help bring millions of dollars in library funding to Iowa from the federal government. They are also the professional associations that libraries and their staff rely on for professional development and peer collaboration.Again, I urge you to vote NO on this bill for your constituents.Thank you, Kristie VanGorkom

02-22-2025

Darrell Aaron

Please vote no on this bill. There are significant advantages to being a dues paying member of many nonprofit organizations that do advocacy. Our libraries deserve to funded and to operate independently to fulfill the promise of freedom that this country is founded upon.

02-22-2025

Mariah Beechum

Libraries provide information to all. They provide age appropriate sections and will even suggest to parents for children to read something more appropriate and in their area. It is like a movie theater or an old video store, there are designated areas for specific age groups and reading levels. It is frustrating to think that a vague censorship and stopping access to information is a good idea.Everyone's definition of what they think is appropriate is different from each other. So what is good for one, won't be good for the other. Let Parents walk into a library with their child and discuss literature with them. Don't just blindly strip access to materials so that no one can access them.

02-22-2025

Hailey Andersen

02-22-2025

Mariah Beechum

Vote No on this bill! Libraries provide information to all. They provide age appropriate sections and will even suggest to parents for children to read something more appropriate and in their area. It is like a movie theater or an old video store, there are designated areas for specific age groups and reading levels. It is frustrating to think that a vague censorship and stopping access to information is a good idea.Everyone's definition of what they think is appropriate is different from each other. So what is good for one, won't be good for the other. Let Parents walk into a library with their child and discuss literature with them. Don't just blindly strip access to materials so that no one can access them.

02-22-2025

Kelsey VanderWerf [Charles City Community School District]

Public libraries are vital institutions that serve as cornerstones of democracy, education, and equal access to information. Defunding them would not only be detrimental to communities but could also raise serious constitutional concerns.The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to access information, which is fundamental to free speech and expression. Public libraries provide critical access to books, digital resources, and public records, ensuring that all citizensregardless of economic statushave the ability to educate themselves and engage in informed discourse. The Supreme Court has recognized this principle in Board of Education v. Pico (1982), where it ruled that removing access to information in libraries based on ideological reasoning can infringe upon constitutional rights. A significant reduction in funding that limits access to these resources would set a dangerous precedent, restricting the free flow of information.Public libraries serve as equalizers, ensuring that every individualregardless of socioeconomic statushas access to knowledge, jobseeking tools, and legal resources. Defunding libraries would disproportionately harm lowerincome and rural communities, where these institutions serve as primary access points for education and technology. Under the Fourteenth Amendments Equal Protection Clause, policies that disproportionately affect marginalized groups can face legal scrutiny. Furthermore, the Due Process Clause protects citizens from the unjust removal of public benefits, such as library services, without legitimate justification.Beyond constitutional concerns, public libraries provide essential services, including literacy programs, internet access, workforce development assistance, and community meeting spaces. These services are irreplaceable and cannot be replicated through private or online alternatives alone. Weakening our library system will have longterm consequences, including lower literacy rates, increased barriers to employment, and a less informed citizenry.I urge this subcommittee to recognize the profound impact that defunding public libraries would have on our state and its residents. Rather than diminishing these invaluable institutions, we should be investing in them to ensure that future generations continue to benefit from free and equal access to knowledge. I strongly urge you to reject HF284 & SF238, and to advocate for continued library funding.

02-22-2025

Nicole Osborn

02-22-2025

Brandon Despenas

HF284 & SF238Public libraries are vital institutions that serve as cornerstones of democracy, education, and equal access to information. Defunding them would not only be detrimental to communities but could also raise serious constitutional concerns.First Amendment ConcernsThe First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to access information, which is fundamental to free speech and expression. Public libraries provide critical access to books, digital resources, and public records, ensuring that all citizensregardless of economic statushave the ability to educate themselves and engage in informed discourse. The Supreme Court has recognized this principle in Board of Education v. Pico (1982), where it ruled that removing access to information in libraries based on ideological reasoning can infringe upon constitutional rights. A significant reduction in funding that limits access to these resources would set a dangerous precedent, restricting the free flow of information.Fourteenth Amendment ConcernsPublic libraries serve as equalizers, ensuring that every individualregardless of socioeconomic statushas access to knowledge, jobseeking tools, and legal resources. Defunding libraries would disproportionately harm lowerincome and rural communities, where these institutions serve as primary access points for education and technology. Under the Fourteenth Amendments Equal Protection Clause, policies that disproportionately affect marginalized groups can face legal scrutiny. Furthermore, the Due Process Clause protects citizens from the unjust removal of public benefits, such as library services, without legitimate justification.The Broader Impact on CommunitiesBeyond constitutional concerns, public libraries provide essential services, including literacy programs, internet access, workforce development assistance, and community meeting spaces. These services are irreplaceable and cannot be replicated through private or online alternatives alone. Weakening our library system will have longterm consequences, including lower literacy rates, increased barriers to employment, and a less informed citizenry.I urge this subcommittee to recognize the profound impact that defunding public libraries would have on our state and its residents. Rather than diminishing these invaluable institutions, we should be investing in them to ensure that future generations continue to benefit from free and equal access to knowledge. I strongly urge you to reject HF284 & SF238, and to advocate for continued library funding.

02-22-2025

Jessica Musil

NO. This is disgusting overreach. Why are you punishing libraries for this? Membership organizations are vital to support institutions. Taking away aid for lobbying is incomprehensible, especially when lobbying is a small part of that membership organization's work. This is nothing more than continuing to attack libraries. Have you ever been to a library and witnessed the actual work provided by these public servants? Before you judge and take away funding, talk to librarians, visit a library, and see the good. Libraries are so much more than the 'dirty books' that people are focusing on. Do better for Iowans by supporting libraries instead of harming them.

02-22-2025

Libby Slappey

As a frequent user of our local public library, I strongly urge you to vote NO on HF 284. The library's affiliation with the American Library Association is one of the reasons our library is the awardwinning, nationally recognized public library it is. The ALA stands for intellectual freedom and directly translates as to why our public library is the palace for the people.

02-22-2025

AMBER REDMOND

Public libraries are vital institutions that serve as cornerstones of democracy, education, and equal access to information. Defunding them would not only be detrimental to communities but could also raise serious constitutional concerns.First Amendment ConcernsThe First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to access information, which is fundamental to free speech and expression. Public libraries provide critical access to books, digital resources, and public records, ensuring that all citizensregardless of economic statushave the ability to educate themselves and engage in informed discourse. The Supreme Court has recognized this principle in Board of Education v. Pico (1982), where it ruled that removing access to information in libraries based on ideological reasoning can infringe upon constitutional rights. A significant reduction in funding that limits access to these resources would set a dangerous precedent, restricting the free flow of information.Fourteenth Amendment ConcernsPublic libraries serve as equalizers, ensuring that every individualregardless of socioeconomic statushas access to knowledge, jobseeking tools, and legal resources. Defunding libraries would disproportionately harm lowerincome and rural communities, where these institutions serve as primary access points for education and technology. Under the Fourteenth Amendments Equal Protection Clause, policies that disproportionately affect marginalized groups can face legal scrutiny. Furthermore, the Due Process Clause protects citizens from the unjust removal of public benefits, such as library services, without legitimate justification.The Broader Impact on CommunitiesBeyond constitutional concerns, public libraries provide essential services, including literacy programs, internet access, workforce development assistance, and community meeting spaces. These services are irreplaceable and cannot be replicated through private or online alternatives alone. Weakening our library system will have longterm consequences, including lower literacy rates, increased barriers to employment, and a less informed citizenry.I urge this subcommittee to recognize the profound impact that defunding public libraries would have on our state and its residents. Rather than diminishing these invaluable institutions, we should be investing in them to ensure that future generations continue to benefit from free and equal access to knowledge. I strongly urge you to reject HF284 & SF238, and to advocate for continued library funding.

02-22-2025

Jade Hart

As with any profession, librarians rely on professional associations such as the American Library Association and the Iowa Library Association to advance their professional skills and better serve to their communities. To strip funding based on these memberships and on ideological differences would immeasurable harm everyone involved. Please vote NO on HF 284.

02-22-2025

Cathy Cooney

I strongly encourage you to vote NO on this legislation. It's unconstitutional and unacceptable to legislate against membership in an organization based on viewpoint. Libraries across the state (and country) benefit immensely from membership in professional organizations like these, which bring millions of dollars of library aid into our state, provide essential grants and professional development opportunities to library staff and libraries, and ultimately improve the services offered to the public as a result. Penalizing people or libraries for joining professional organizations opposes freedom of thought and freedom of inquiry and ultimately would be a detriment to society as a whole.

02-22-2025

Shawna Riggins

I OPPOSE HF284. Please support libraries and do not pass this legislation. Libraries support our entire community by providing access to information for all. Please do not create opportunities to limit access to information. This will have a PROFOUND negative impact on education and our collective future in Iowa.

02-22-2025

Rachel Evans

I urge you to vote NO to this bill. Participating in professional associations shouldn't limit the public funding a library is able to get. These associations offer grant opportunities and professional development to libraries and library workers and improve services provided to the public. Penalizing individuals or institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought, inquiry, and the collective improvement of our society. Please vote no.

02-22-2025

Annette Dean

I am a resident of Waverly, and have been a library professional for 15 years. HF 284 violates the principle of free association and is therefore unconstitutional. Shame on you for even considering a bill that is at its root a violation of one of the most basic freedoms in America. Professional organizations support those professions, by offering continuing education opportunities, networking opportunities, and funding resources. Vote no on HF 284

02-23-2025

Megan Klein-Hewett

I urge you to vote no on HF284. Professional organizations such as the Association of Small and Rural Libraries and the American Library Association bring in millions of dollars to support Iowa's libraries. Library staff take advantage of professional development opportunities and networking to keep Iowa's libraries some of the best in our nation. Legislating against a membership organization is unconstitutional, and goes against Iowa's values of free thought and inquiry.

02-23-2025

Jessica Netolicky

I strongly oppose this bill, which would strip Enrich Iowa funding from libraries that pay dues to organizations engaged in advocacy work. Targeting membership organizations based on their viewpoints is unconstitutional and undermines the fundamental right to free association. This legislation unfairly penalizes libraries that belong to essential professional organizations that play a critical role in securing millions of dollars in federal funding for Iowas libraries and provide invaluable professional development and collaboration opportunities for library staff. Removing this funding would harm Iowas libraries and the communities they serve. I urge you to vote NO on HF284.

02-23-2025

E Salek

Vote NO! The primary purpose of a public library is to provide resources and services to meet the needs of the community for the purpose of education, and information. Libraries also promote personal growth and development by building literacy and fostering a productive and engaged community. Libraries are more than just books. With free access to the internet, education, and news, libraries help keep the public informed and engaged. Libraries, and by extension all the functions beyond lending books, are a great equalizer, meaning they serve the people in our community, of every age, education and income level, ethnicity and physical ability making our community stronger and more informed.

02-23-2025

Theresa Pagliai

Vote No on H284! As a library trustee I see first hand the value of a library's membership and affiliation with these professional organizations. Organizations like the Iowa Library Association are a warehouse of ideas, education, and advocacy for library staff and trustees. For example, the ILA's Trustee Handbook ensures trustees are well prepared to hire the Library Director, approve and monitor the budget, develop strong policy and plan for the library's future. Our trustee board recently viewed a webinar provided by the ILA about the importance of following Iowa's Sunshine Laws. Holding a community hostage by targeting the library's ability to connect to a professional organization due to a small group of people's personal opinion is wrong. Vote NO on H284!

02-23-2025

Angela W.

I support this bill. Entities that receive state funds should not be allowed to use those same funds to promote political activities that would be to their financial or ideological benefit. This is an incestuous relationship and needs to end.

02-23-2025

Keri Weston Stoll

Vote no. This bill would eliminate library funding for participation in standard professional development. Participation in professional organizations is how librarians across the state and country share ideas with and learn from one another to help offer new and improved services to their communities. All professions have local and national organizations that help them stay educated on current trends, why would you want to punish libraries for implementing a standard practice?

02-23-2025

Amber McNamara

I urge you to vote NO on this bill. Stripping funding from libraries for participation in organizations designed to support them is wrong. These associations offer educational opportunities, program support, and critical resources. The funding fromEnrich Iowa is also critical. Libraries are democratic institutions offering access to everyone, and this would be devastating. This hurts Iowans, plain and simple.

02-23-2025

Jennifer Adkisson

Please vote against HF284. Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. It violates the principle of free association, a cherished and protected right in our democracy. This legislation would impact the ability of libraries across the state to benefit from professional organizations such as the Iowa Library Association, Association of Small and Rural Libraries, Medical Library Association, American Association of Law Libraries, Association of Research Libraries, Chief Operating Officers of State Library Associations, American Theological Library Association, and American Library Association. These professional associations help bring millions of dollars in library aid to Iowa from the federal government. These associations offer grant opportunities and professional development to libraries and library workers and improve services provided to the public. Penalizing individuals or institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought, inquiry, and the collective improvement of our society.

02-23-2025

Renate Bernstein

Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. Professional associations help bring millions of dollars in library aid to Iowa from governmental and other grant bestowing organizations, as well as professional development to library workers, which improve services provided to the public.Penalizing individuals or institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of a free and democratic society.

02-23-2025

Sandy Long [Whittemore Public Library]

I urge you to vote NO on this bill. Stripping funding from libraries for participation in organizations designed to support them is wrong. These associations offer educational opportunities, program support, and critical resources. The funding from Enrich Iowa is also critical. Libraries are democratic institutions offering access to everyone, and this would be devastating. This hurts Iowans, plain and simple. As the Director of a very small Library in northern Iowa, the Enrich Iowa funding is extremely important to us.

02-23-2025

Jessica Young

Vote NO on this bill. I want the right to access materials freely at my local library. I want to make the choice for myself whether I feel something is obscene. If a particular book is not something I want to read for whatever reason I will leave it on the shelf and not check it out. I do not want the government or other random community members deciding for me what I can and cannot access. Vote NO.

02-23-2025

Mara Egherman

Please vote NO on this bill. Penalizing individuals or institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought, inquiry, and the collective improvement of our society. Libraries provide resources to all Iowans, and help citizens learn information literacythe foundation of our democracy.

02-23-2025

Evelyn Nikkel [PELLA PAC]

YES!! Vote YES for HF 284. Although most of the 544 libraries in Iowa receive between 90 to 95% of their funding from city and county taxes, this legislation rightfully penalizes public libraries for being stupid and following the Marxist, leftist, evil ALA and ILA "professional" organizations. Although the state's funding is a smaller percentage, YES, withhold Iowa's money from promoting the flooding of our libraries with ALA approved obscene materials, LGBTQ deviant sexual behaviors. graphic pornography, R rated streaming and adult audios. Unfortunately, most libraries will fire a parttime book sorter and continue their servitude to these demonic organizations.

02-23-2025

Judy Janssen

Vote NO on this bill. Legislation regulating memberships in organizations is likely unconstitutional. This is a thinly veiled attack on the ALA and ILA by the same people who are trying to control what is in our libraries. Membership in these organizations is helpful and valuable for those running our libraries.

02-23-2025

Erica Eis

Please vote no on HF 284. Librarians should be able to join organizations that support their work without the threat of losing funding. Iowa libraries contribute so much to their communities but are only able to do so because of the conscientious, hard work of library staff. Let librarians, and libraries, continue to be a source of Iowa pride by voting no on HF 284.

02-23-2025

John Stoll

Vote no. Libraries serve as a public service to everyone in the community. Why would you want to prevent them from training librarians. Professional development is what makes people grow in their jobs and passing this would take away libraries ability to continue to grow with their communities and continue to provide the services and knowledge their communities they serve need.

02-23-2025

Merideth Willett

Please vote NO on HF284. Libraries provide essential services in their communities. Many services that are not provided by other organizations. Professional organizations help libraries do this. They provide grant opportunities and professional development to libraries and library workers and improve services provided to the public. Penalizing institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought and inquiry.

02-23-2025

Katie Roche

I oppose HF 284. HF 284 is an unconstitutional attempt to legislate against a membership organization based on viewpoint, violating the fundamental right to free association. This bill would have farreaching consequences for libraries across Iowa, hindering their ability to engage with essential professional organizations such as the Iowa Library Association, the Association of Small and Rural Libraries, and the American Library Association. These organizations play a critical role in securing millions of dollars in federal library aid for Iowa, offering grant opportunities, and providing professional development that enhances library services for the public. Penalizing individuals or institutions for participating in these associations undermines the core values of free thought, inquiry, and the collective advancement of our communities. HF 284 is not just an attack on librariesit is an attack on intellectual freedom and the vital resources that sustain Iowas libraries and the people they serve.

02-23-2025

Katie Roche

I oppose this bill. HF 235 is a dangerous and unnecessary attack on public libraries, opening the door to frivolous lawsuits that could financially cripple libraries and the cities that support them. By removing the public library exemption in the obscenity code, this bill would allow anyone to repeatedly sue a library over materials they personally object to, regardless of legal merit. The resulting legal fees could consume library budgets, forcing cities to reconsider whether they can afford to keep libraries open. This legislation is redundant, as obscenity is already clearly defined by law through the Miller Test and the Serious Value Test. More importantly, HF 235 threatens free speech and access to information, granting the state power to ban books and materials with educational and cultural value. The current exemption is not a loopholeit exists to protect libraries in their role as educational institutions, not as distributors of obscene material. Stripping this protection undermines the publics right to an uncensored library and threatens the very foundation of intellectual freedom.

02-23-2025

Rick Phillips [PELLA PAC]

We support the passage of HF284. The American Library Association and Iowa Library Association are nonprofit organizations that influence legislation at federal, state and local levels of government. Recently discovered is that these organizations promote LGBTQ, Marxist, and DEI agendas. Only 10% of the population identifying as such should not receive public assistance in the form of tax dollars from a 90% majority that rejects the indoctrination that is proving to be harmful to minors. Please pass HF284.

02-23-2025

Jane Robinette

HF284 makes no sense. Withholding certain funding from libraries if they belong to professional library associations that advocate for...libraries? What's next? Cities can't belong to associations of cities? School boards can't belong to associations of school boards? More micromanagement for no reason other than to exercise power over others. Vote no on HF284.

02-23-2025

A. Johnson

Vote no on HF 284. Public libraries are so important to communities, not just for books, but as places for kids to stay after school, places to use printers and get access to government documents. Removing funding from libraries does nothing except restrict access to books and information.

02-23-2025

Alex Ingram

This is against American values dating back to the revolutionary war by telling people that if they want to be paid, they need to not fight for their rights. If you pass this you will defund libraries over the fact that they help innocent people or help combat unfairness in the world. If you do this, you are no better than the oppressors in the greater world.

02-23-2025

Sheila Schofer

Please vote no to HF 284. This proposed bill restricts important access for professional support for librarians across the state and would result in the loss of grant and funding opportunities. A small rural library in my county received grant money through a professional organization to add accessible entry doors for the library and the community was thrilled. Withholding state funds for idealogical reasons is unacceptable.

02-23-2025

Jennifer Delperdang

Please do not vote in favor of this bill. I attended my local districts legislative forum this weekend. I heard concerns from citizens on a wide range of issues that should be what this legislature is focused on. Helping Iowans live better lives. Making Iowa a better place to livea place that young people want to come to, rather than leave. Stop trying to undermine the good work that libraries are doing in our state!

02-23-2025

Kathy Parsons

First, thank you for your service to the citizens of Iowa. Second, thank you for allowing me to express my opinions on this bill.Before you dismiss my thoughts, I would like you to know that the library professional organizations have members from all political views, ethnicity, gender, and more. They are some of the most accepting organizations I have served at the state and national levels. They are where I was accepted and felt that I belonged.I strongly encourage you to vote no for this bill. These professional organizations help bring federal dollars to the great State of Iowa, provide training for library staff and librarians, and improve services to the public from the smallest community to the largest city, from k12 (public and private) and colleges and universities (public and private). By penalizing individuals or institutions for participating in professional organization goes against the values of democracy...freedom of thought, of speech, of the press. Legislating against membership organizations based on viewpoint is unacceptable and unconstitutional.Thank you for your time. Peace, Joy, and Grace to you.

02-23-2025

Leslie Noble

This bill will take funding away from libraries. These professional organizations provide grants and opportunities for libraries to improve the services they provide to their communities. Iowa libraries and librarians have the right to advocate for their valuable work, and this bill is unconstitutional.

02-23-2025

merle ayres ayres

Enrich Iowa is a very useful and important tool for small libraries in our state. It works and keeping it is essential. Libraries share where a book can be found and sent to the nearest library for pickup. There is no waste in this system. If a book I want is in any part of Iowa it can be sent locally. Keep the good you have now.

02-23-2025

Benjamin Larson [Nebraska Cardiac Care]

As a constituent I demand you vote NO on this bill. Iowa has fallen from being a top 10 state for childhood testing and literacy to the bottom 40, how will more restrictions on freedom of speech help with our children learning? It's not as if this won't be undone in court just like florida's attempt last year to strip books and learning materials, seeing them rip thousands of books only to have to put them back months later. This is either just another culture war joke, or a waste of time. Vote no.

02-23-2025

Dolores Bristol

Please vote no. This is a huge overstep.. If you don't like a book, don't read it; if you don't like a program, don't go to it. Libraries serve whole communities and deserve to be fully funded. Bills like this are why young people no longer want to live in Iowa.

02-23-2025

Bethany Schiefelbein

Vote NO to this bill that specifies that "eligible public library" for the purposes of the Enrich Iowa Program must not be a dues paying member of nonprofit organizations that promote legislation or advocacy efforts. Our local public libraries are instrumental in the reading comprehension levels of our children and adults. Our Iowa children's readings scores still have not achieved preCovid levels and tackling this begins with librarian support for our kids from infancy onward. My Spencer public library has played a significant role in my family's life in multiple ways. This includes literacy for our four young daughters, accessing local and state news, technology support, exercise and fall prevention for senior citizen friends, youth and adult reading groups, craft activities, and more. Our librarians have also served as an foundational resource point for Spencer Flood Recovery information. All of our library's past and ongoing advocacy work is vital to our community.

02-23-2025

Jenna Prusa

02-23-2025

Ashley Burns

Please vote NO on HF284. Our libraries are one of the few remaining public entities that welcome everyone regardless of political ideology or income. We don not need any more reasons to limit access to information in our communities, states, country. This is dangerous & irresponsible legislation that will have devastating consequences. Iowans love & are proud of our Libraries. This bill is unpopular amongst voters & it is time for this Legislature to listen to its constituents & stands up for the good of our state.

02-23-2025

Kara Ohorilko

Please vote no on this bill. As a resident in a rural area, my family has depended on multiple libraries over the years as sources of children's programming, books for leisure, meeting spaces, and general information. Funding for libraries is critical, and every penny is needed. In all my years, I have never once come across a librarian that was doing anything more than trying to help my family members or me, and I have never seen any evidence of a librarian trying to push a personal or political agenda on us, or any library patron. Again, I plead with you to vote against this bill. Our libraries are vital to our communities and make them better places.

02-23-2025

Katie Winkelstein-Duveneck

As an educator, I strongly oppose this bill. Libraries are so important to our communities. Removing childrens access to books and the other vital services provided by libraries is a big mistake. They will be our leaders tomorrow and we need to care for them and educate them.

02-24-2025

Marsha Pilger

For the life of me I dont understand why anybody in the right mind would ever vote for house file 284. All it is is an attempt to shut down free speech in America. First you wanna take the books away from people because you think theyre inappropriate and now you want to take the funding away from libraries because you want more control. I definitely as an author disagree with all of this. If youre any kind of a human being at all and you think that you represent our constituents in our state and you will stand up for public speech And vote this bill down.

02-24-2025

Rebecca Funke

I urge you to vote NO on this bill. Libraries use this funding to provide services to all Iowans. Our libraries are amazing places and use this funding to share resource across the state, providing better access to all Iowans.

02-24-2025

Laura Sherwin

This bill is a thinly veiled attempt by Moms for Liberty to harass public libraries and ultimately censor the materials that Iowans can read.Vote NO on this bill.Public libraries provide essential services to the community in addition to housing books and other materials.

02-24-2025

Laura Sherwin

02-24-2025

Brett Cloyd

Please vote no. Legislators need to hear from a variety of perspectives. Restricting funding to organizations that support libraries limits input to the public policy process and has the potential to create negative outcomes for Iowa communities. Thank you.

02-24-2025

Alanna Reeves

I'm writing to express my strong opposition to House File 284 which would block public libraries from being members of professional organizations like the Association of Small and Rural Libraries, the Iowa Library Association, and the American Library Association. This bill is unnecessary and harmfulit restricts libraries from accessing the resources, education, and support they need to best serve their communities.Libraries are at the heart of our towns and cities, providing access to knowledge, community programs, and essential services. Being part of professional organizations helps them stay up to date on best practices, training, and ways to better support the public. Cutting them off from these networks only makes it harder for them to do their jobs effectively.Beyond that, this bill raises serious First Amendment concerns. Librariesand the people who run themshould have the freedom to associate with organizations that help them do their work better. Trying to limit that is a government overreach that doesnt serve the public good.Restricting library memberships in this way would make it harder for them to function, limit access to resources, and ultimately hurt the communities that rely on them. I urge you to OPPOSE SF 238 and stand up for our public libraries and their right to be part of the professional organizations that help them thrive.

02-24-2025

Hilary Tanner

Please VOTE NO! The Iowa Library Association has always provided many benefits to its members. It provides grants, professional development opportunities, and improved services. Membership should be encouraged and not penalized by denying Enrich Iowa Funds to these libraries.

02-24-2025

H Pedelty

Vote NO on HF 284. Like other professions and entities that have national associations, libraries and librarians should be able to freely engage with each other and their organizations without fear of recrimination from state government. The organizations provide crucial support for the mission of serving all of the public!!!

02-24-2025

Stella Herzig

Please vote no on HF 284.Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. It violates the principle of free association, a cherished and protected right in our democracy. It is UnAmerican.You should be protecting our freedoms, not restricting them! This bill sounds very communist!Thank you.

02-24-2025

Joe Monahan

Why we need this bill to pass: Ten or so years ago these formerly rational organizations (The ILA and the ALA) were run by librarians interested in libraries. Now they have been captured by extremist activists pushing a social and political ideology on the public. These social justice warriors realized they can have steady and easy access to our money by getting into leadership positions within these nonprofit organizations that are tax payer supported. They can essentially turn them into personal political organizing committees that "do the work" with our hard earned cash. That is why the people you see here fighting this bill are not Mom and Pop, but the activists themselves. They figured out how to use our money against us, and are fighting to keep from loosing that reliable flow of tax payer cash.

02-24-2025

Joe Monahan

The ILA had a $200,000 budget in 2024. Of that more than $180,000 of it was our tax money. They used that money not to make libraries better, but to promote a political ideology. A bunch of our money was used to fight SF496 a bill passed at the request of tax paying citizens to protect small children from the pornography the library groomers were peddling. The ILA and the ALA have figured out how to get their dirty little hands on our money and use it against us. That has to stop.

02-24-2025

Susanne Leibold [Clarke University]

VOTE NO! This has to be one of the most insulting bills I have seen regarding libraries. Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. It violates the principle of free association, a cherished and protected right in our democracy. You will not silence people by making certain types of occupations unable to have free speech. You cannot kill the marketplace of ideas by silencing librarians. This legislation would impact the ability of libraries across the state to benefit from professional organizations such as the Iowa Library Association, Association of Small and Rural Libraries, Medical Library Association, American Association of Law Libraries, Association of Research Libraries, Chief Operating Officers of State Library Associations, American Theological Library Association, and American Library Association. The State pays into lobbying associations (National Governor's Association is one) to make their voice heard. You aren't giving that up. Why should institutions smaller, with less political access, be punished financially for doing the same? What are you trying to accomplish with this bill?These professional associations help bring millions of dollars in library aid to Iowa from the federal government. Why would you jeapordize these funds for such a sort sighted goal.These associations offer grant opportunities and professional development to libraries and library workers and improve services provided to the public. Penalizing individuals or institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought, inquiry, and the collective improvement of our society.I urge you to vote no!

02-24-2025

Gail Marincovich

I currently work at our local public library and am vehemently opposed to this proposal. Our library, like all public libraries, is essential to our community. Our space provides free access to countless information services, including computers,FAX machines, tax forms, newspapers, magazines, atlases,and of course books. Our programming encompasses a wide range of offerings everything from art classes to book clubs to children's activities. Our services benefit all ages large print books for our older patrons, a robust selection of non fiction books for student projects, picture books and readers for kids, meeting rooms for community groups, and a welcoming space for families to gather and children to play. For this to happen, librarians need connections to organizations that provide opportunities to brainstorm and share ideas for making libraries even better for the communities they serve. And none of that can happen without funding. It is absolutely absurd that this bill would deny libraries the tools they need to function. Please vote no on this disastrous proposal.

02-24-2025

Jamie Richards

As a graduate of one of the University of Iowas worldrenowned graduate programs in literature, censorship legislation would render the shining accomplishments widely recognized by the publishing industry and national institutions mute, and darken the educational and intellectual range of Iowas residents and students alike. Please do not introduce such legislation. It would destroy one of the most special characteristics of Iowa with grave consequences for the public. Most importantly, it goes against the constitutional right to free expression.

02-24-2025

Angela Griner

Our public libraries need full funding and I oppose this bill. In particular, the Council Bluffs Public Library, is a resource for our community, especially for our most vulnerable populations. Have you spent time in a library lately to see all the services they offer? They are vital and need all the funding they can receive.

02-24-2025

Amy Muchmore

I urge you to vote NO on HF284. There are over 12 MILLION visits to Iowa public libraries each year. Libraries provide essential services to their communities and many have already suffered the unintended consequences of funding loss because of HF718. Further cuts to funding will harm Iowans who use their libraries to access essential information, apply for jobs, attend programs, and participate in civic engagement.

02-24-2025

Linda smithson

Please vote NO to HF 284. Iowa libraries are sources of information and so much more to the people of Iowa. Cutting funding to libraries who receive valuable training and support from professional organizations is akin to saying that working in isolation is best. The professional organizations that support libraries are vital to sharing of ideas. The Library Bill of Rights was written here in Iowa. The ALA uses this as an example of freedom of information. Voting for this bill would censor librarians and libraries themselves, cutting YOUR constituents off from programs that advance the wellbeing of our communities.

02-24-2025

Samantha Ferm [Ferm]

please vote NO.Libraries are a place for community, and they also need to connect with and support each other, ESPECIALLY in rural areas/towns where libraries are so small and need to be a part of a bigger network. The associations not only help libraries receive important grants and funding but also to connect with each other, learn and grow. you cannot legislate how libraries choose to connect with each other, in this case, in the form of associations just because you're scared of advocacy work. that is literally the right of all American citizens.

02-24-2025

Ann Burns [citizen]

I urge you to vote NO on this bill. This bill to withhold funding from any Iowa library that is a dues paying member of a library advocacy organization is a violation of the freedoms of association and speech. If you pass this bill out of committee, then you had better follow it with a bill that prohibits farmers/landowners who receive state Soil and Water Conservation District funds from being members of Farm Bureau or have insurance through Farm Bureau.

02-24-2025

Kate Dreyer

I am writing to express my strong opposition to HF 284, which would prohibit the use of public funds for memberships to the Iowa Library Association. This bill would undermine the ability of our libraries to stay connected to valuable professional resources, training, and advocacy that help them better serve our communities.Library associations provide essential support, including continuing education, best practices, and collaboration opportunities that enhance library services for all residents. Cutting off funding for these memberships would limit access to professional development, ultimately harming the quality and effectiveness of our public libraries.Investing in library associations is an investment in stronger libraries, bettertrained staff, and improved services for the public. I urge you to oppose this bill and continue supporting our libraries ability to engage with these critical professional networks.Many of the library workers in small communities would not be able to afford going to the annual conference each year, as they rarely make more than minimum wage. The ability to use money from the budget for continuing education is the only way.Is there a plan to restrict other organizations from allowing public dollars to be spent this way

02-24-2025

Amanda Brewer [Harlan Community Library]

Vote NO. The libraries rely on the expertise of these professional organizations in their day to day activities. Our state is full of small rural libraries that are the hubs of their community. These libraries provide access to technology, literature and social connections. Iowa is built on small rural communities. Penalizing a library by taking away funding for being part of professional organizations that provide them education, tools and a sense of unity is shameful. This bill will only negatively impact Iowan's access to literature, technology and social connections that keep rural communities vibrant.

02-24-2025

Brittney Lerner

Vote NO. Please leave our libraries alone. They are the pillars of our communities. Libraries are for everyone and the only space that people can just simply exist. Taking away important spaces will only hurt your constituents.

02-24-2025

Cary Siegfried

Please vote NO on this bill. Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. It violates the principle of free association, a cherished and protected right in our democracy. This legislation would impact the ability of libraries across the state to benefit from professional organizations professional associations provide professional development opportunities that make our libraries better!These professional associations help bring millions of dollars in library aid to Iowa from the federal government. Penalizing individuals or institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought, inquiry, and the collective improvement of our society.

02-24-2025

Jonathan Banse

Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. It violates the principle of free association, a cherished and protected right in our democracy. Professional associations help bring millions of dollars in library aid to Iowa from the federal government. Undermining organizations like these due to viewpoint differences is a direct attack on the first amendment.

02-24-2025

Kerry Vande Kieft

I urge you to vote no on this bill. Enrich Iowa funds are an essential part of development funding for libraries and their loss would drastically impact all libraries, but particularly those in rural communities. These funds are already regulated and restricted for use in certain categories tied to development.

02-24-2025

Vicki Crannell [Friends of the Mary J Barnett Library]

VOTE NO!!! The Iowa Library Association has always provided many benefits to its members. It provides grants, professional development opportunities, and improved services. Membership should be encouraged and not penalized by denying Enrich Iowa Funds to these libraries. Please VOTE NO!

02-24-2025

Samantha Yeager-Walrath

Please vote no on HF284. Library staff deserve to have access to resources and education just like any other professional would without losing vital funding. Libraries are a foundation of our community and exist as a space where everyone belongs and can learn about topics important to them, no matter their belief systems.

02-24-2025

Dee Obrien

Vote NoYou want people to enter the work force? Library services make that possible in so many waysYou want school kids to have meaningful experiences? Library services make that possible alsoYou want teen agers and young adults to stay safe from dangerous activities? Yes Library servicesQuality of life is important for ALL Iowans this bill takes that away

02-24-2025

Kennedy LaVille Thoren

Vote no! I grew up spending many of my days in a library and am the proud daughter of a librarian. My family continues to spend a lot of time at our local library and benefits from the events and activities they host.Libraries already function on limited funds. Support our public libraries!

02-24-2025

Melita Tunnicliff

The ILA and the ALA offer so much support and information to public libraries, which is especially helpful to smaller rural libraries where most of the emplyees don't have Library degrees. As for lobbying, last year at the ILA Conference, when they discussed proposed bills that affect libraries, legislators from BOTH parties were invited and participated in the discussion. This bill is dealing with a supposed problem that doesn't exist.

02-24-2025

Angela West

VOTE NO! Libraries serve whole communities and deserve to be fully funded, period. If you don't like a book, don't read it; if you don't like a program, don't go. There are already safeguards in place to keep obscene materials out of the hands of children.

02-24-2025

Bill Gardam [Self]

Vote No on this bill. This bill will remove eligibility for DAS Enrich Iowa Funding if a library is a member of a state library association or any other organization that engages in advocacy for libraries. This does not make sense. Organizations working together is what most organizations do in Iowa for example farmers that raise soybeans belong to the Iowa Soybean Association. Should they be banned also? Where dies this stop if we head down this path.So what impact could this have?Open Access for Iowans with direct access to more library materials and information resources funding could be lost. This program enables eligible customers to go to participating libraries and directly check out physical materials. As a result, Iowans have greater access to more library resources, more choices in library service, and the convenience of using a library where they work, shop, or visit. The state reimburses the loaning library a small amount for each item checked out to offset expenses. LIBRARY IMPACT: 495 Iowa libraries (public and academic) participated in the Open Access program in FY24. Vote NO on this bill.Direct State Aid provides financial support to public libraries from state funds, with the goal of moving library service in Iowa closer to the ideal envisioned by library customers, librarians, and government officials.Public libraries are required to submit a report on how they used the Direct State Aid money distributed to their library, which is reflected in an annual report submitted to the governor and state legislature.LIBRARY IMPACT: Since 2014, Direct State Aid funding has helped lead to a 20.1 percent increase in the number of accredited libraries in Iowa. In FY24, 468 public libraries (out of 543) in Iowa received Direct State Aid funding. This is a good thing with a positive impact for Iowans!Interlibrary Loan Reimbursement provides Iowa Interlibrary Loan 380,960 citizens with equal access to library resources by encouraging and supporting the loaning of materials among all types of libraries. If a library does not own a book a local patron needs, the library can borrow it through interlibrary loan.Libraries are reimbursed with state funding to help offset costs.LIBRARY IMPACT: 545 Iowa libraries (public and nonpublic) participated in the Interlibrary LoanReimbursement program in FY24.Three programs with three positive impacts for Iowans ate now at risk due to this bill. Please Vote NO.

02-24-2025

Michael Maxwell

First of all do you all even take the time to listen to public comments or are we all just screaming into the void? Because it sure seems like most of this subcommittee does not give a damn about what their constituents have to say. This is unpopular legislation. Its unpopularity stems from the fact that it's antiAmerican grandstanding and censorship targeted at harassing whatever minority these witchhunters hate this week. Attacking citizens' rights to access information can only be meant to disempower and disenfranchise our communities. They're not protecting innocence, they're enforcing ignorance. Argue with the wall. I do not care what Representative Helena "split ends" Hayes thinks is obscene. Her smug and disingenuous defense of her trash legislation makes it abundantly clear that she's bullying queer kids because she thinks it'll get her clout. Nobody of sound mind is worried about "Marxists" indoctrinating children via public libraries. This is not 1917, calm down. (also kids may be impressionable, but it seems like these legislators think kids are stupid.) If you don't want to engage with the public library for whatever reason, then don't. But don't spoil a good thing for everyone else. Imagine how nice Iowa would be if our legislators were more concerned with cleaning our drinking water and less concerned with harassing librarians for attention. Nobody is forcing anyone to go to the public library, let alone forcing their kids to check out any books their parents don't want them reading. The burden of proof here is not on our public libraries. They were minding their own business and providing the same critical public services they always have. It's cowardly people like Representative Hayes who are trying to redefine terms beyond their rational definitions so they can call public libraries Marxist instead of just being openly homophobic/transphobic/racist. They think they're slick, but they're not. (Is the fire department Marxist too?) This is a theocratic strain of Sovietstyle censorship that really has nothing to do with what books kids are reading and everything to do with a cruel desire to ostracize vulnerable people further from society. Supporters of legislation like HF 284 are not being honest with their justifications for any of these attacks on libraries. Our legislators need to not only answer for why they're attacking vital institutions all of a sudden (because they were told to, I'm sure), but they also need to justify their decision making process. The public response to this and other antifree speech, antilibrary legislation has been overwhelmingly in opposition to this legislation. And yet it passes through. Who are our legislators listening to if not their constituents? Who are they working for if not the citizens of Iowa? The lack of transparency and the unwillingness to engage with these issues in good faith has been appalling to witness. This state will continue to hemorrhage young people who are fleeing elsewhere to live as long as our legislators seem hellbent on making Iowa as inhospitable as possible. Why would anyone want to live somewhere run by people like Representative Hayes? Chaos is not strength, and a bully is a bully is a bully. Stop being "Good Germans" and be real Iowans. Please.

02-24-2025

Michael Maxwell

I invite everyone to take a look at Representative Hayes' campaign website for insight into the true motivating factors behind her legislative priorities. She openly twists the Constitution to fit her religious needs mind you, she is not a constitutional law expert by any means. Her resume is out there for anyone to read. Here are some highlights from Representative Hayes' website: (on Freedom) "Firmly protected by our Constitution, the liberty to live in accordance with biblical principles and values, while being guided by a framework that respects both individual rights and moral responsibilities", (on the Constitution) "As the elected Iowa House Representative, Helena is committed to upholding the moral principles and individual freedoms grounded in biblical values as outlined in our founding documents", and then she also has this vaguely defined and not really her job anyway category of "innocence" on her platform that states "Safe guarding the virtue of our vulnerable children." Methinks perhaps it is not the public libraries and librarians who are "pushing an agenda" here... How come Representative Hayes gets to openly shove her religious dogma down Iowa taxpayer throats? How is that legal? Also what exactly is she protecting vulnerable children from? Knowledge of their own bodies that could protect them from exploitation by predators? The fact that gay people exist? That slavery happened? Who is Representative Hayes really protecting here? Her website is https://www.helenaforhouse.com/ and I encourage everyone to go read her own words to get to the heart of what all this hateful legislation is really about. Representative Hayes' fringe religious views do not represent my views or the views of most Iowans, and, while I respect her right to practice whatever faith she allegedly has, Representative Hayes is not extending this same respect to any other Iowans. Go start a lending library at your church and leave the public libraries alone. You have no business imposing your beliefs on us. The lady doth protest too much! (That's a quote from a play called Hamlet, Helena, just fyi. You can hopefully still find a copy of it at your local public library, at least for now...)

02-25-2025

Brooke Dearborn Huston

I oppose this bill. Censorship is a fascist act. Let's adults decide for themselves what they want to access, and let children be cared for by the guardians they accompany at the library. Adults can make informed choices for themselves while protecting young people from inappropriate materials. This is no different than tv show choices, music, movies, games, etc.

02-25-2025

Carissa Starleaf

Prohibiting libraries from being a part of professional organizations that help both libraries and librarians succeed is bizarre. What is the benefit of this? Is it because the American Library Association refuses to deny the history of the United States and doesn't whitewash books that are available for the appropriate patrons? You cannot erase history by banning libraries and access to books. In fact I suggest you look into some history and read why those who ban books are not remembered fondly but as fascists.