Meeting Public Comments

Subcommittee meeting and times are as follows:

Attendance at subcommittee meetings by lobbyists and the public is via zoom or in-person. See agenda for zoom details. Only authenticated users are permitted access.

SF 238

A bill for an act modifying provisions related to public libraries that are eligible to receive state assistance under the enrich Iowa program.

Agenda

Subcommittee members: Salmon-CH, Campbell, Winckler

Date: Wednesday, February 26, 2025

Time: 10:00 AM - 10:30 AM

Location: Room 315

Comments Submitted:

The purpose of comments is to provide information to members of the subcommittee.

Names and comments are public records. Remaining information is considered a confidential record.

02-20-2025

Sam B

Vote no on SF 238! Most citizens do not want this bill passed, and it would be a detriment to everyone who uses a library in more ways than you'd think! Libraries exist to serve everyone in every community with different values and beliefs. Stripping them of already low funds would be a disservice to the entire state! Support public libraries! Vote no to SF 238!

02-20-2025

Sam Helmick

I strongly oppose the proposed legislation that would disqualify libraries from membership in the Association of Small and Rural Libraries, the Iowa Library Association, or the American Library Association, and other networks that support ongoing skill building and support which directly impacts the public. This bill not only undermines the collaborative efforts vital for the development and support of libraries but also infringes on First Amendment rights, particularly the freedom of association.By modifying the definition of "eligible public library" to exclude those that are duespaying members of national or state nonprofit organizations, this legislation seeks to limit libraries' ability to connect with essential resources, education, and support networks. Libraries play a crucial role in fostering community engagement and access to information, and they should not be penalized for participating in professional organizations that enhance their capabilities.Restricting library memberships in this manner is an alarming move that restricts not only their operational efficacy but also their fundamental rights. The freedom to associate with organizations that advocate for better library services is a cornerstone of democratic engagement. I urge lawmakers to reconsider this bill and to protect the vital role that libraries play in our communities and in the broader context of free speech and association.

02-20-2025

Emma Stoffer

This bill targets nonprofit organizations that exist to support all libraries. While advocacy efforts are an important aspect of these organizations, to reduce their work to that single action is an egregious mischaracterization of their purpose. The American Library Association, the American Association of Law Libraries, the American Association of School Libraries, the American Theological Library Association, the Art Libraries Society of North America, the Association of College and Research Libraries, the Association of Research Libraries, the Library Information Technology Association, the Medical Library Association, the Music Library Association, the Public Library Association, the Association for Library Service to Children, the Association for Library Collections and Technical Services, the Special Libraries Association, the Young Adult Library Services Association, the Reference and User Services Association, and of course the Iowa Library Association among so many others, are organizations that provide professional guidance, resources, and publications that support all librarians and library users. Public libraries and public librarians in Iowa have the right to seek professional development without putting their funding in jeopardy. Professionals in other fields, private and public, are encouraged to pursue opportunities that strengthen their careers and allow them to network with their colleagues. Over 850 municipalities in Iowa are members of the Iowa League of Cities, an organization that provides professional guidance, resources, and publications that support city leaders. Additionally, they provide advocacy tools. Iowa library professionals deserve access to professional development opportunities. Iowa library professionals deserve access to networking opportunities. Iowa library professionals deserve access to guidance from leaders in their field. Iowa library professionals deserve access to resources and publications from experts in their field. Iowa library professionals deserve to have people advocating for them. I do not support SF 238.

02-20-2025

Marilyn Moser

Please vote no on this bill. Our libraries provide essential services to so many in our communities. I am a small town librarian and I can assure you that we are not pushing obscene books at your children and grandchildren.

02-20-2025

Emily Kingery

Vote no. All of these libraryadverse bills do nothing to help people. They just make it harder for libraries to receive the funding they deserve, for librarians to do their jobs, and for people to access services they need.

02-20-2025

Isaiah Greimann

I have witnessed with my own eyes how our community library assists people from all walks of life. They provide afterschool programs for children who may not have a happy home to return to, and they help individuals who are homeless gain access to the Internet to apply for jobs and housing. The library also supports young families in meeting and greeting new people in the communities where they have just moved. Additionally, they offer students a quiet atmosphere in which to study, free from distractions. They create an inclusive environment for people with disabilities, providing resources that allow them to enjoy literature just like anyone else. Yes, it is true that libraries are the gems of our communities. Any underfunding would not only be detrimental to the communities they serve, but it would also be a grotesque stain on the fabric of our state.

02-20-2025

Theo Prineas

Vote no! Libraries make Iowa communities happier, more productive, and more resilient. Libraries drive economic growth through programs that assist with job seekers; by connecting small businesses with the resources they need; and by enabling lifelong learning for Iowans to develop new skills. Engaging with a modern economy requires access to digital services, which libraries provide to countless Iowans who don't have Internet or computer access at home. Libraries bring these services together in one place, allowing communities to grow and thrive in the best times, and coordinate and rebuild in hard times. We need to fund libraries because they provide these benefits.

02-20-2025

Suzanne Miller

The Iowa Library Association has always provided many benefits to its members. It provides grants, professional development opportunities, and improved services. Membership should be encouraged and not penalized by denying Enrich Iowa Funds to these libraries. Please VOTE NO!

02-20-2025

Theresa Pagliai

I strongly oppose SF 238. Memberships in professional organizations provide libraries across the state access to essential resources, education, and support networks. I have served on our local library's board of trustees for many years and have seen the benefits our library has received through these associations. Targeting libraries ability to serve patrons based on someones personal agenda is unamerican and flies in the face of First Amendment protections. Libraries belong to all Iowans.

02-21-2025

Evelyn Nikkel [PELLA PAC]

YES!!! Absolutely pass this bill for the sake of our children and grandchildren. Now almost all of our 544 libraries belong to either ILA or ALA, which is basically the same thing a Marxist, godless group hellbent on flooding our minors with sexually explicit graphic novels, violent R rated streaming videos, adult audio books, "updated" classics (now depict Anne Frank as a lesbian) and dozens and dozens of LGBTQ+ materials grooming our kids towards normalizing and desensitizing them to deviant sexual behaviors. Two other suggestions: 1) change the structures of the libraries so that they are not autonomous, incestuous boards with no accountability to elected officials except the mayor's rubber stamp on the Director's suggestion for the next board member, agreed to by a council that doesn't look at the applicants' information and 2) since over 90% of libraries' funding comes from the city and county, make them both liable with deep financial penalties for the obscenities allowed in our libraries attacking our minors. Make cities and counties responsible and held accountable. Right now they pass it off because most libraries in Iowa have NO oversight by any elected officials making it taxation without representation.

02-21-2025

Bobbi Newman

I strongly oppose SF 238, a bill that unfairly targets libraries and restricts their ability to participate in professional organizations. This legislation is a direct violation of the constitutional right to free association and an unacceptable government overreach.Professional organizations such as the Iowa Library Association, American Library Association, Medical Library Association, Association of Small and Rural Libraries, and many others provide essential resources that directly benefit Iowa libraries and the communities they serve. These organizations help secure millions of dollars in federal funding for our libraries, offer grant opportunities, professional development, and training, and ensure that libraries can continue to provide highquality services to the public.Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional. It sets a dangerous precedent of government interference in professional affiliations, threatening not only libraries but any institution that relies on national or regional expertise to improve services. Penalizing libraries and library workers for joining professional organizations undermines intellectual freedom, collaboration, and the advancement of library services.SF 238 is not about improving librariesit is an attempt to punish institutions for engaging with professional networks that support free thought, inquiry, and community enrichment. If passed, this bill will harm library services, restrict access to funding, and disadvantage Iowa communities that rely on wellsupported public libraries.I urge you to reject SF 238 and stand in support of Iowas libraries, library workers, and the right to professional association. Libraries are essential to our democracy, and they deserve every opportunity to grow, learn, and serve their communities without politically motivated restrictions.

02-21-2025

Julia Bauder

Please vote no. Professional organizations such as the Association for Small and Rural Libraries, the Iowa Library Association, and the Association for Library Service to Children provide invaluable professional development opportunities for Iowa's librarians. Making it more difficult for Iowa libraries to join these organizations and for Iowa librarians to learn from their programming will harm the quality of library services in Iowa.

02-21-2025

Jeff Collins

I respectfully urge you to vote NO on this bill. It would be detrimental to restrict membership in support organizations that offer valuable opportunities for grant funding and professional development. It is nonsensical to target library associations. What about professional associations that support their professionals, like doctors, lawyers, and other government workers?

02-21-2025

Taylor Erickson

VOTE NO!I oppose SF 238 because it unfairly punishes public libraries for being members of certain organizations. Libraries join these groups to better serve our communities, share resources, and stay updated on best practices. Cutting their funding over this would hurt their ability to provide the books, programs, and services we all rely on. Libraries should be supported, not restricted, for doing whats best for their patrons. I urge you to vote against SF 238 and keep our libraries strong.

02-21-2025

Gina Schlesselman-Tarango

Vote No!This legislation would impact the ability of libraries across the state to benefit from professional organizations such as the Iowa Library Association, Association of Small and Rural Libraries, Medical Library Association, American Association of Law Libraries, Association of Research Libraries, Chief Operating Officers of State Library Associations, American Theological Library Association, and American Library Association. These professional associations not only provide essential professional development opportunities for library leaders and staff, but also help bring millions of dollars in library aid to Iowa from the federal government, improving services provided to the public. This is particularly necessary in rural communities where other opportunities and services may be lacking.

02-21-2025

Lexie Reiling

Please vote no on this bill. If it passed, our libraries would lose funds that provide materials and services to the public, in addition to the loss of opportunities for training and professional development that help ensure our libraries are providing the best possible resources for Iowans.

02-21-2025

Jodie Morin

I sense that the Iowa Legislature assumes that librarians in Iowa are being brainwashed into some secret agenda by our professional organizations. What we receive is not a political agenda but education, support, and the ability to network with other library staff. I have not yet met a librarian who couldn't form their own opinions on pretty much anything and everything. To suggest otherwise insults us as professionals. This legislations is based on your faulty understanding of our professional organizations, which operates very much like the AMA does for doctors or the ABA does for lawyers. Unless you plan to outlaw the AMA and the ABA next, vote no on this bill and ensure that public libraries receive full and generous funding to support Iowa communities.

02-21-2025

Nancy isebrand

Please vote NO. Libraries are essential to so many people, especially as the cost of living increases, but wages do not. People need to be able to visit a library for books, research, computer access, job applications, shelter and more. VOTE NO.

02-21-2025

Michelle Andersen

Please vote no on this proposal. Every penny of library funding is put to good use and it seems irresponsible to discourage professional librarians from joining their professional organizations that help keep them informed of happenings in their field.

02-21-2025

Jamie Noack

I urge you to vote no on SF 238. Libraries make Iowa communities happier, more productive, and more resilient. Libraries drive economic growth through programs that assist with job seekers; by connecting small businesses with the resources they need; and by enabling lifelong learning for Iowans to develop new skills. This bill targets nonprofit organizations that exist to support all libraries. While advocacy efforts are an important aspect of these organizations, to reduce their work to that single action is an egregious mischaracterization of their purpose. The American Library Association, the American Association of School Libraries, and the Iowa Library Association among so many others, are organizations that provide professional guidance, resources, and publications that support all librarians and library users. Public libraries and public librarians in Iowa have the right to seek professional development without putting their funding in jeopardy. Professionals in other fields, private and public, are encouraged to pursue opportunities that strengthen their careers and allow them to network with their colleagues. Over 850 municipalities in Iowa are members of the Iowa League of Cities, an organization that provides professional guidance, resources, and publications that support city leaders. Additionally, they provide advocacy tools. Iowa library professionals deserve access to professional development opportunities. Iowa library professionals deserve access to networking opportunities. Iowa library professionals deserve access to guidance from leaders in their field. Iowa library professionals deserve access to resources and publications from experts in their field. Iowa library professionals deserve to have people advocating for them. I do not support SF 238.

02-21-2025

Liz P

Please vote no on this bill. Libraries are so incredibly valuable to our communities. Their access to organizations that support and lift up librarians is of incredible importance. They help make librarians and libraries better able to support patrons and the community. They help bring money in to our communities. This is especially beneficial to small town libraries that do have the funds that larger cities have. Vote no.

02-21-2025

Tanya Demmel

I strongly support a NO vote on this. We are a country of freedoms and people should be allowed the freedom to read what they want. If parents are concerned about what their children are reading then they need to work with their child and with the child's reading choices. All people should not be restricted in subject matter. It is historical fact that when reading has been denied to a population it was in an attempt to keep the population ignorant and avoid objections from the population. With the increase in wanting to limit the availability of materials it makes me wonder what is our government (which is supposed to protect our freedoms) trying to keep the public ignorant of. If nothing, than what young people are or are not reading is the parent's responsibility not the government.

02-21-2025

Jillian Rutledge

Please vote NO on SF238. Libraries provide essential services to their communities and many have already suffered the unintended consequences of funding loss because of HF718. Further cuts to funding will harm Iowans who use their libraries to access essential information, apply for jobs, attend programs, and participate in civic engagement. There were 12 MILLION visits to Iowa public libraries each year. This bill is an attack on Iowans' Constitutional Rights and infringes their freedom to assemble.

02-21-2025

Anne Mangano

Please vote no. Enrich Iowa helps rural Iowans and their public libraries serve them. If the choice is to not participate in professional organizations, Iowa librarians will no longer share best practices and evolve their library services to better meet the needs of their communities, which is gained through organizations like the American Library Association, the Iowa Library Association, and the Association of Rural and Small Libraries.

02-21-2025

Charlotte Brookins

I strongly urge you to vote no on this bill. I see each day the work that public libraries do to enrich their communities, provide a place of resilience, and consistently support their patrons. Passing this bill would be stripping these nonprofit organizations of their ability to serve the public, which would not only be detrimental to the countless people benefitting from them, but would also be violating a library's right to free association. Please, vote no!

02-21-2025

Lisa Johnson

02-21-2025

MARGARET HOEL

VOTE NO ON SF238This legislation would impact the ability of libraries across the state to benefit from professional organizations such as the Iowa Library Association, Association of Small and Rural Libraries, Medical Library Association, American Association of Law Libraries, Association of Research Libraries, Chief Operating Officers of State Library Associations, American Theological Library Association, and American Library Association.

02-21-2025

Wendy Doyel

Please vote NO on this bill! This bill not only hurts libraries and library workers, it also impacts communities. By losing funding we lose our ability, as librarians, to provide for the people of our community who we are here to serve. These associations not only offergrant opportunities and professional development to libraries and library workers, but they provide help and education for librarians. These associations stand for our most basic freedoms, that is not something most people are willing to give up.

02-21-2025

Chris Stoner

Please vote no on SF 238. By removing Enrich Iowa funding eligibility for libraries that are members of professional organizations like the Iowa Library Association, the Association of Rural and Small Libraries, and the American Library Association, the state would be hamstringing public libraries by limiting their connections to external resources and professional development. Forcing libraries to choose between receiving vital state funding and having access to professional networks, resources, and peer connections is a loselose proposition that will weaken the efficacy of the public services Iowa libraries provide.

02-21-2025

Jessica LInk

Please vote no on SF 238. Strong libraries need both critical funding and professional support, connections, and development opportunities for their dedicated staff. This bill will harm libraries in our state and the people they serve. This will harm Iowans.

02-21-2025

Scott Brown

I urge you to vote no on this proposed bill. It appears to me to be another try by the "book burners" in Pella and other misguided communities to penalize our wonderful public libraries. Iowa has some of the best if not the best public library system in the US why spend time and effort trying to mess with something that is not broken, but is driven by misguided partisan politics.

02-21-2025

Molly Angstman

Please vote NO on this bill. It is an unnecessary overstep. Support organizations provide valuable and costsaving opportunities for libraries. Why on earth would you get rid of that access? Libraries are so important to so many people and deserve more resources to help them do that.

02-21-2025

Lisa Leuck

I hope that you know that a vote for this change says that you do not want people or organizations to advocate for themselves, and if they do, they will be monetarily punished. Those in Des Moines perhaps need to visit a small, rural library like the one I led for 18 years, to understand that without Enrich Iowa, they will close their doors. And without advocacy from organizations such as ALA and ILA, they will also have to close their doors. These organizations are invaluable to aiding libraries in their mission of helping all people in a community promote literacy and setting up standards of excellence, giving education, and providing invaluable help to libraries who cannot afford the staff to do all that is necessary. This would be a vote to begin the process of eliminating libraries. This vote has nothing to so with the materials themselves inside the library. It has to do with the institution itself and freedom itself. Do the majority of your constituents want to end libraries? I know that the small communities surrounding where I live could not function without them. Vote no.

02-21-2025

Dana Hinders

Libraries are fundamental to community engagement and access to information, and they should not be penalized for participating in organizations that enhance their services.Restricting library memberships in this way is a dangerous step that weakens their ability to serve the public effectively while also curtailing their fundamental right to association. The ability to connect with professional organizations dedicated to improving library services is essential for both librarians and the communities they serve. I urge lawmakers to reject this bill and uphold the crucial role of libraries in fostering education, free speech, and democratic engagement.

02-22-2025

Jan Netolicky

Why on earth would our legislators willingly place a stranglehold on the work of our public libraries? Eliminating funding sources which facilitate community education, enrichment, and exploration is, in a word, inexplicable. It may very well be unconstitutional as well. The library is a nonprofit entity with membership in multiple associations: American Library Association, Association of Small & Rural Libraries, Medical Library Association, American Association of Law Libraries, Chief Operating Officers of State Library Associations, American Theological Library Association, and the Iowa Library Association. SF238 and its companion bill HF284 attempt to legislate based upon the majority party's assessment of which viewpoints are "acceptable." I urge you to vote NO on both SF238 and HF284.

02-22-2025

Molly Altorfer

Please vote NO on this bill!Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional; it violates the principle of free association. This bill removes funding from libraries who are members of the American Library Association, Association of Small & Rural Libraries, Medical Library Association, American Association of Law Libraries, Chief Operating Officers of State Library Associations, American Theological Library Association, and the Iowa Library Association. These associations help bring millions of dollars in library funding to Iowa from the federal government. They are also the professional associations that libraries and their staff rely on for professional development and peer collaboration.Vote no on SF 238.

02-22-2025

Karen Lehmann

Vote no. Ability to join organizations that help libraries function is critical to their effectiveness. Doctors collaborate, lawyers work together: so should librarians. It is ridiculous, ignorant and insulting that this is even being proposed.

02-22-2025

Kristie VanGorkom

PLEASE vote NO on this bill! Libraries are public institutions, which should be allowed to serve the entire public, and educate and advocate on our behalf.Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional; it violates the principle of free association. This bill removes funding from libraries who are members of the American Library Association, Association of Small & Rural Libraries, Medical Library Association, American Association of Law Libraries, Chief Operating Officers of State Library Associations, American Theological Library Association, and the Iowa Library Association. These associations help bring millions of dollars in library funding to Iowa from the federal government. They are also the professional associations that libraries and their staff rely on for professional development and peer collaboration.Again, I urge you to vote NO on this bill for your constituents.

02-22-2025

Kelsey VanderWerf [Charles City Community School District]

Public libraries are vital institutions that serve as cornerstones of democracy, education, and equal access to information. Defunding them would not only be detrimental to communities but could also raise serious constitutional concerns.The First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to access information, which is fundamental to free speech and expression. Public libraries provide critical access to books, digital resources, and public records, ensuring that all citizensregardless of economic statushave the ability to educate themselves and engage in informed discourse. The Supreme Court has recognized this principle in Board of Education v. Pico (1982), where it ruled that removing access to information in libraries based on ideological reasoning can infringe upon constitutional rights. A significant reduction in funding that limits access to these resources would set a dangerous precedent, restricting the free flow of information.Public libraries serve as equalizers, ensuring that every individualregardless of socioeconomic statushas access to knowledge, jobseeking tools, and legal resources. Defunding libraries would disproportionately harm lowerincome and rural communities, where these institutions serve as primary access points for education and technology. Under the Fourteenth Amendments Equal Protection Clause, policies that disproportionately affect marginalized groups can face legal scrutiny. Furthermore, the Due Process Clause protects citizens from the unjust removal of public benefits, such as library services, without legitimate justification.Beyond constitutional concerns, public libraries provide essential services, including literacy programs, internet access, workforce development assistance, and community meeting spaces. These services are irreplaceable and cannot be replicated through private or online alternatives alone. Weakening our library system will have longterm consequences, including lower literacy rates, increased barriers to employment, and a less informed citizenry.I urge this subcommittee to recognize the profound impact that defunding public libraries would have on our state and its residents. Rather than diminishing these invaluable institutions, we should be investing in them to ensure that future generations continue to benefit from free and equal access to knowledge. I strongly urge you to reject HF284 & SF238, and to advocate for continued library funding.

02-22-2025

Brandon Despenas

HF284 & SF238Public libraries are vital institutions that serve as cornerstones of democracy, education, and equal access to information. Defunding them would not only be detrimental to communities but could also raise serious constitutional concerns.First Amendment ConcernsThe First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to access information, which is fundamental to free speech and expression. Public libraries provide critical access to books, digital resources, and public records, ensuring that all citizensregardless of economic statushave the ability to educate themselves and engage in informed discourse. The Supreme Court has recognized this principle in Board of Education v. Pico (1982), where it ruled that removing access to information in libraries based on ideological reasoning can infringe upon constitutional rights. A significant reduction in funding that limits access to these resources would set a dangerous precedent, restricting the free flow of information.Fourteenth Amendment ConcernsPublic libraries serve as equalizers, ensuring that every individualregardless of socioeconomic statushas access to knowledge, jobseeking tools, and legal resources. Defunding libraries would disproportionately harm lowerincome and rural communities, where these institutions serve as primary access points for education and technology. Under the Fourteenth Amendments Equal Protection Clause, policies that disproportionately affect marginalized groups can face legal scrutiny. Furthermore, the Due Process Clause protects citizens from the unjust removal of public benefits, such as library services, without legitimate justification.The Broader Impact on CommunitiesBeyond constitutional concerns, public libraries provide essential services, including literacy programs, internet access, workforce development assistance, and community meeting spaces. These services are irreplaceable and cannot be replicated through private or online alternatives alone. Weakening our library system will have longterm consequences, including lower literacy rates, increased barriers to employment, and a less informed citizenry.I urge this subcommittee to recognize the profound impact that defunding public libraries would have on our state and its residents. Rather than diminishing these invaluable institutions, we should be investing in them to ensure that future generations continue to benefit from free and equal access to knowledge. I strongly urge you to reject HF284 & SF238, and to advocate for continued library funding.

02-22-2025

Jessica Musil

NO. This is disgusting overreach. Why are you punishing libraries for this? Membership organizations are vital to support institutions. Taking away aid for lobbying is incomprehensible, especially when lobbying is a small part of that membership organization's work. This is nothing more than continuing to attack libraries. Have you ever been to a library and witnessed the actual work provided by these public servants? Before you judge and take away funding, talk to librarians, visit a library, and see the good. Libraries are so much more than the 'dirty books' that people are focusing on. Do better for Iowans by supporting libraries instead of harming them.

02-22-2025

Libby Slappey

As a frequent user of our local public library, I strongly urge you to vote NO on HF 284. The library's affiliation with the American Library Association is one of the reasons our library is the awardwinning, nationally recognized public library it is. The ALA stands for intellectual freedom and directly translates as to why our public library is the palace for the people.

02-22-2025

AMBER REDMOND

Public libraries are vital institutions that serve as cornerstones of democracy, education, and equal access to information. Defunding them would not only be detrimental to communities but could also raise serious constitutional concerns.First Amendment ConcernsThe First Amendment of the United States Constitution protects the right to access information, which is fundamental to free speech and expression. Public libraries provide critical access to books, digital resources, and public records, ensuring that all citizensregardless of economic statushave the ability to educate themselves and engage in informed discourse. The Supreme Court has recognized this principle in Board of Education v. Pico (1982), where it ruled that removing access to information in libraries based on ideological reasoning can infringe upon constitutional rights. A significant reduction in funding that limits access to these resources would set a dangerous precedent, restricting the free flow of information.Fourteenth Amendment ConcernsPublic libraries serve as equalizers, ensuring that every individualregardless of socioeconomic statushas access to knowledge, jobseeking tools, and legal resources. Defunding libraries would disproportionately harm lowerincome and rural communities, where these institutions serve as primary access points for education and technology. Under the Fourteenth Amendments Equal Protection Clause, policies that disproportionately affect marginalized groups can face legal scrutiny. Furthermore, the Due Process Clause protects citizens from the unjust removal of public benefits, such as library services, without legitimate justification.The Broader Impact on CommunitiesBeyond constitutional concerns, public libraries provide essential services, including literacy programs, internet access, workforce development assistance, and community meeting spaces. These services are irreplaceable and cannot be replicated through private or online alternatives alone. Weakening our library system will have longterm consequences, including lower literacy rates, increased barriers to employment, and a less informed citizenry.I urge this subcommittee to recognize the profound impact that defunding public libraries would have on our state and its residents. Rather than diminishing these invaluable institutions, we should be investing in them to ensure that future generations continue to benefit from free and equal access to knowledge. I strongly urge you to reject HF284 & SF238, and to advocate for continued library funding.

02-22-2025

Jade Hart

As with any profession, librarians rely on professional associations such as the American Library Association and the Iowa Library Association to advance their professional skills and better serve to their communities. To strip funding based on these memberships and on ideological differences would immeasurable harm everyone involved. Please vote NO on HF 284.

02-22-2025

Cathy Cooney

I strongly encourage you to vote NO on this legislation. It's unconstitutional and unacceptable to legislate against membership in an organization based on viewpoint. Libraries across the state (and country) benefit immensely from membership in professional organizations like these, which bring millions of dollars of library aid into our state, provide essential grants and professional development opportunities to library staff and libraries, and ultimately improve the services offered to the public as a result. Penalizing people or libraries for joining professional organizations opposes freedom of thought and freedom of inquiry and ultimately would be a detriment to society as a whole.

02-22-2025

Shawna Riggins

I OPPOSE HF284. Please support libraries and do not pass this legislation. Libraries support our entire community by providing access to information for all. Please do not create opportunities to limit access to information. This will have a PROFOUND negative impact on education and our collective future in Iowa

02-22-2025

Rachel Evans

I oppose SF238. Participating in professional associations shouldn't limit the public funding a library is able to get. These associations offer grant opportunities and professional development to libraries and library workers and improve services provided to the public. Penalizing individuals or institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought, inquiry, and the collective improvement of our society. Please vote NO.

02-23-2025

KATHLEEN WINTER [- Select -]

Vote NO on this bill. Libraries are a hub of learning and opportunity, especially in small towns. Stop the interference. Our public library is doing just fine being run by a board of committed local residents.

02-23-2025

Megan Klein-Hewett

I'm writing in opposition to SF238. Professional organizations such as the Association of Small and Rural Libraries, the Iowa Library Association, and the American Library Association bring in millions of dollars to support Iowa's libraries. Library staff take advantage of professional development opportunities and networking to keep Iowa's libraries some of the best in our nation. Legislating against a membership organization is unconstitutional, and goes against Iowa's values of free thought and inquiry.

02-23-2025

Jessica Netolicky

I strongly oppose this bill, which would strip Enrich Iowa funding from libraries that pay dues to organizations engaged in advocacy work. Targeting membership organizations based on their viewpoints is unconstitutional and undermines the fundamental right to free association. This legislation unfairly penalizes libraries that belong to essential professional organizations such as the American Library Association, Association of Small & Rural Libraries, Medical Library Association, American Association of Law Libraries, Chief Operating Officers of State Library Associations, American Theological Library Association, and the Iowa Library Association. These organizations play a critical role in securing millions of dollars in federal funding for Iowas libraries and provide invaluable professional development and collaboration opportunities for library staff. Removing this funding would harm Iowas libraries and the communities they serve. I urge you to vote NO on SF 238.

02-23-2025

Theresa Pagliai

Vote No on SF 238! As a library trustee I see first hand the value of a library's membership and affiliation with these professional organizations. Organizations like the Iowa Library Association are a warehouse of ideas, education, and advocacy for library staff and trustees. For example, the ILA's Trustee Handbook ensures trustees are well prepared to hire the Library Director, approve and monitor the budget, develop strong policy and plan for the library's future. Our trustee board recently viewed a webinar provided by the ILA about the importance of following Iowa's Sunshine Laws. Holding a community hostage by targeting the library's ability to connect to a professional organization due to a small group of people's personal opinion is wrong. Vote NO on SF 238!

02-23-2025

Keri Weston Stoll

Vote no. This bill would eliminate library funding for participation in standard professional development. Participation in professional organizations is how librarians across the state and country share ideas with and learn from one another to help offer new snd improved services to their communities. All professions have local and national organizations that help them stay educated on current trends. Why would you want to punish libraries for implementing a standard practice?

02-23-2025

Jennifer Adkisson

Please vote against SF238. Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. It violates the principle of free association, a cherished and protected right in our democracy. This legislation would impact the ability of libraries across the state to benefit from professional organizations such as the Iowa Library Association, Association of Small and Rural Libraries, Medical Library Association, American Association of Law Libraries, Association of Research Libraries, Chief Operating Officers of State Library Associations, American Theological Library Association, and American Library Association. These professional associations help bring millions of dollars in library aid to Iowa from the federal government. These associations offer grant opportunities and professional development to libraries and library workers and improve services provided to the public. Penalizing individuals or institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought, inquiry, and the collective improvement of our society.

02-23-2025

Renate Bernstein

Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. Professional associations help bring millions of dollars in library aid to Iowa from governmental and other grant bestowing organizations, as well as professional development to library workers, which improve services provided to the public.Penalizing individuals or institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of a free and democratic society.

02-23-2025

Mara Egherman

Please vote NO. Penalizing individuals or institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought, inquiry, and the collective improvement of our society.

02-23-2025

Stacy Volmer

I am writing to express my strong opposition to Senate File 238, which seeks to disqualify public libraries from receiving state assistance under the Enrich Iowa program if they are duespaying members of nonprofit organizations engaged in advocacy efforts related to libraries.This bill poses a direct threat to the quality, accessibility, and independence of public libraries across our state. By restricting public libraries from affiliating with professional organizations that advocate for their interests, this legislation undermines the ability of libraries to stay informed on best practices, access crucial resources, and engage in important policy discussions that directly affect their ability to serve the public effectively.Nonprofit organizations that advocate for libraries, such as the American Library Association and the Iowa Library Association, provide essential support, training, and resources that help libraries meet the evolving needs of their communities. Denying public libraries the ability to participate in these organizations will isolate them from professional development opportunities and stifle their ability to provide highquality services to Iowans.Furthermore, this bill sets a dangerous precedent by penalizing public institutions for associating with organizations that engage in lawful advocacy. Advocacy is a cornerstone of democratic society, and public libraries should be encouragednot restrictedfrom participating in discussions that shape the policies affecting their communities.The Enrich Iowa program is vital to ensuring equitable access to library services across the state, particularly for rural and underserved communities. This bill would create unnecessary barriers to funding and hinder the ability of libraries to collaborate, innovate, and respond to the needs of their patrons.I urge you to oppose Senate File 238 and protect the ability of public libraries to affiliate with professional organizations and continue serving as invaluable resources for all Iowans.

02-23-2025

Judy Janssen

Vote NO. Legislation regulating memberships in organizations based on viewpoints is likely unconstitutional. This is a thinly veiled attack on the ALA and ILA by the same people who are trying to control what is in our libraries. These organizations are helpful and valuable to our librarians running our libraries.

02-23-2025

Erica Eis

Please vote no on SF 238. Librarians should be able to join organizations that support their work without the threat of losing funding. Iowa libraries contribute so much to their communities but are only able to do so because of the conscientious, hard work of library staff. Let librarians, and libraries, continue to be a source of Iowa pride by voting no on HF 284.

02-23-2025

John Stoll

Vote no. Libraries serve as a public service to everyone in the community. Why would you want to prevent them from training librarians. Professional development is what makes people grow in their jobs and passing this would take away libraries ability to continue to grow with their communities and continue to provide the services and knowledge their communities they serve need.

02-23-2025

Merideth Willett

Please vote no on SF238. Libraries provide essential services in their communities. Many services that are not provided by other organizations. Professional organizations help libraries do this. They provide grant opportunities and professional development to libraries and library workers and improve services provided to the public. Penalizing institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought and inquiry.

02-23-2025

Leslie Noble

This bill will take funding away from libraries. These professional organizations provide grants and opportunities for libraries to improve the services they provide to their communities. Iowa libraries and librarians have the right to advocate for their valuable work, and this bill is unconstitutional.

02-23-2025

Jennifer Delperdang

Please vote no on this bill. I attended my local legislative forum this weekend, but not ONE of my Senators showed up. Is this because they know that the overwhelming majority of Iowans support their public libraries and feel that these bills attacking them are a waste of our legislators time our States resources? Iowa has a rich heritage supporting the Freedom to Read. Do not let a minority of voices change what generations have had.

02-23-2025

Kathy Parsons

First, thank you for your service to the citizens of Iowa. Second, thank you for allowing me to express my opinions on this bill. Before you dismiss my thoughts, I would like you to know that the library professional organizations have members from all political views, ethnicity, gender, and more. They are some of the most accepting organizations I have served at the state and national levels. They are where I was accepted and felt that I belonged. I strongly encourage you to vote no for this bill. These professional organizations help bring federal dollars to the great State of Iowa, provide training for library staff and librarians, and improve services to the public from the smallest community to the largest city, from k12 (public and private) and colleges and universities (public and private). By penalizing individuals or institutions for participating in professional organization goes against the values of democracy...freedom of thought, of speech, of the press. Legislating against membership organizations based on viewpoint is unacceptable and unconstitutional. Thank you for your time. Peace, Joy, and Grace to you.

02-23-2025

Ashley Burns

Please vote NO on SF238. Our libraries are one of the few remaining public entities that welcome everyone regardless of political ideology or income. We don not need any more reasons to limit access to information in our communities, states, country. This is dangerous & irresponsible legislation that will have devastating consequences. Iowans love & are proud of our Libraries. This bill is unpopular amongst voters & it is time for this Legislature to listen to its constituents & stands up for the good of our state.

02-23-2025

Rebekah Jacobs

Please vote OPPOSED to SF 238. Public Libraries deserve to be funded. This bill seeks to remove libraries that are associated with the American Library Association. The question then is why? Is it because the ALA is against book bans? Censorship limits our opportunities to interact with nuance and limits our abilities to grapple with complex topics and ideas. Libraries are supposed to be a place of intellectual freedom.

02-23-2025

Katy Hardy

Please vote Opposed to SF238. Public libraries deserve funding because they are the source of information and cultural hub of every community. They provide a safe space for everyone to learn and grow. They provide knowledge, wonder, and resources for all Iowan citizens. They are vital for our country to thrive!

02-24-2025

Alanna Reeves

I'm writing to express my strong opposition to Senate File 238. This bill is unnecessary and harmfulit restricts libraries from accessing the resources, education, and support they need to best serve their communities.Libraries are at the heart of our towns and cities, providing access to knowledge, community programs, and essential services. Being part of professional organizations helps them stay up to date on best practices, training, and ways to better support the public. Cutting them off from these networks makes it harder for them to do their jobs effectively.Beyond that, this bill raises serious First Amendment concerns. Librariesand the people who run themshould have the freedom to associate with organizations that help them do their work better. Trying to limit that is a government overreach that doesnt serve the public good.Restricting library memberships in this way would make it harder for them to function, limit access to resources, and ultimately hurt the communities that rely on them. I urge you to oppose SF 238 and stand up for our public libraries and their right to be part of the professional organizations that help them thrive.

02-24-2025

Stella Herzig

Please vote no on SF 238. the Iowa Library Association has only done good for the state of Iowa! It upholds basic American values! To oppress organizations because they do not tally exactly with your own views is very dictatorial and communistic. This bill would be at home in North Korea!!This bill is very UnAmerican. Librarians are not an enemy. Why are you suppressing freedoms?Vote no to uphold our constitutional rights.Thank you.

02-24-2025

Shirley Vermace

Our libraries in Iowa are a treasure trove of adventure, knowledge, wisdom, history, and more. Censorship has NO PLACE here, none. Libraries are a lifeline for many Iowans, and they need support, not your Christian Nationalism attacks on free speech and knowledge.

02-24-2025

Shirley Vermace

02-24-2025

Cary Siegfried

Please vote NO on this bill. Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. It violates the principle of free association, a cherished and protected right in our democracy. This legislation would impact the ability of libraries across the state to benefit from professional organizations professional associations provide professional development opportunities that make our libraries better!These professional associations help bring millions of dollars in library aid to Iowa from the federal government. Penalizing individuals or institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought, inquiry, and the collective improvement of our society.

02-24-2025

Vicki Crannell [Friends of the Mary J Barnett Library]

Vote NO!!! I strongly oppose the proposed legislation that would disqualify libraries from membership in the Association of Small and Rural Libraries, the Iowa Library Association, or the American Library Association, and other networks that support ongoing skill building and support, which directly impacts the public!! This bill not only undermines the collaborative efforts vital for the development and support of libraries, but also infringes on First Amendment rights, particularly the freedom of association, by modifying the definition of "eligible public library" to exclude those that are dues paying members of national or state nonprofit organizations. This legislation seeks to limit libraries' ability to connect with essential resources, education, and support networks. Libraries play a crucial role in fostering community engagement and access to information, and they should not be penalized for participating in professional organizations that enhance their capabilities. Restricting library memberships in this manner is an alarming move that restricts not only their operational efficacy but also their fundamental rights. The freedom to associate with organizations that advocate for better library services is a cornerstone of democratic engagement. I urge lawmakers to reconsider this bill and to protect the vital role that libraries play in our communities and in the broader context of free speech and association.

02-24-2025

Samantha Yeager-Walrath

Please vote NO on SF 238. Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. It violates the principle of free association, a cherished and protected right in our democracy.

02-24-2025

Nancy Medema

I respectfully request that you vote no on this bill. Library associations are no different than the League of Cities that cities depend on for training, networking, and yes, advocacy. The Enrich Iowa funds are crucial to the budgets of Iowas small, rural libraries and loss of that funding would mean the closure of many libraries across Iowa. Iowa residents love their libraries and will not be happy if the library in their town closes.

02-24-2025

Katie Giorgio

I urge you to vote NO on this bill. We need to protect our public libraries and the funding they receive as they are critical resources for all Iowans. This bill is detrimental to the very fabric of our communities and our state. Please vote NO!

02-24-2025

Diane McFadden [Atlantic Public Library]

Please support libraries. Don't underfund the most needed equalizer. Libraries provide free access to information for ALL PEOPLE. Libraries level the playing field and provide materials, computer & internet wifi access, printing, faxing, programming and connections in our communities. Don't take away funding and the ability for every library's mission to provide quality material for EVERYONE.

02-24-2025

Angela West

Vote NO on SF 238! Most citizens do not want this bill passed, and it would be a detriment to everyone who uses a library in more ways than you'd think! Libraries exist to serve everyone in every community with different values and beliefs. Stripping them of already low funds would be a disservice to the entire state! Support public libraries!

02-24-2025

Astrid Bennett

I vehemently oppose this legislation. PLEASE VOTE NO to SF 238! Please leave our libraries alone. They are important as community centers and also to Iowas reputation as a place where education matters and also to the many home schoolers in the state. The Iowa Legislature is interested in job creation. This kind of legislation is what drives potential and current residents away from wanting to settle, work and pay taxes here.

02-24-2025

Barb Phillips

Other professions, such as doctors, lawyers, and teachers, have similar associationswhy should libraries be treated differently? Vote NO to SF 238. Cutting Enrich Iowa funds would disproportionately harm rural and smalltown libraries, limiting access to job resources, internet services, and educational programs that many Iowans rely on. Penalizing libraries for participating in professional organizations weakens communities, hurts local economies, and restricts free access to information. Don't defund the institutions that serve all Iowansvote NO.

02-24-2025

Rachel Yoder

As a citizen of Iowa, I am calling on my representatives and those who have the interests of the citizens at heart, to vote against this bill. Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. It violates the principle of free association, a cherished and protected right in our democracy.

02-24-2025

Jenny Goulden

This provision will have a devastating impact on public libraries, particularly in smaller communities, and will ultimately harm Iowans across the state. The Iowa Library Association (ILA) and the American Library Association (ALA) provide essential continuing education that keeps librarians uptodate with new trends in technology, information, and best practices. This education is critical to helping libraries serve their communities effectively. For example, as artificial intelligence becomes more widespread, ALA and ILA offer training, publications, and expert advice to help librarians educate the public, job seekers, and other community members on how to use AI responsibly.Without access to these professional organizations, many librarians will be cut off from vital resources and training that are necessary to meet the evolving needs of their communities. Where else are they supposed to find this critical education if not through these associations? Cutting off this support will leave libraries illequipped to handle the challenges and opportunities that new technologies and emerging issues present.The smallest libraries will bear the greatest burden. They will face an impossible choice: either forgo critical staff training or lose access to important projects funded by Enrich Iowa. This provision will not only reduce the quality of services that libraries can offer, but it will also limit access to vital resources for job seekers and those seeking to improve their skills. Libraries are often the backbone of communities, especially in rural areas, offering educational resources and other vital services. Denying libraries the funds to pay for memberships in professional organizations will harm local economies by limiting access to job training programs and other resources that help residents improve their skills and find employment.Police and fire departments rely on professional organizations to support their staff developmentso why should librarians be treated any differently? Professional development through organizations like ILA and ALA is crucial for librarians to stay current on trends, technology, and best practices that improve library services. Penalizing libraries for investing in this professional development sends a troubling message that supporting librarians' growth is not a priority.Enrich Iowa funds are also a vital resource that ensures Iowans across the state can access to essential services. Removing these funds as a penalty for paying membership dues will discourage libraries from collaborating and offering memberships to all Iowans. This will have an outsized impact on rural communities, where residents rely on small local libraries for access to larger systems and resources. The loss of Enrich Iowa funds could disrupt the cooperative system that ensures Iowans, no matter where they live, have access to the best resources and services available.This bill also represents a troubling misalignment of state priorities. Instead of fostering an environment where libraries can thrive, it imposes unnecessary restrictions that will hinder their ability to adapt and grow. By penalizing libraries for supporting professional development, the state is devaluing the important work librarians do to improve their communities, support lifelong learning, and provide essential services.In the long term, this bill will only hurt Iowas libraries and the people who depend on them. Removing funding for professional development will undermine the effectiveness of libraries, reducing access to resources, educational opportunities, and career support. It is critical that we support libraries, not penalize them, if we want to ensure Iowans have the tools they need to succeed in an everchanging world.

02-24-2025

Amy Nonhof

Please vote NO for bill SF 238. The American Library Association, the American Association of School Libraries, and the Iowa Library Association among so many others, are organizations that provide professional guidance, resources, and publications that support all librarians and library users. You would be taking away the resources that Librarians have to become better at their jobs which in turn is very beneficial for the general public as a whole.

02-24-2025

Katy Philby

I strongly oppose SF 238. This bill would limit the ability for libraries to participate in professional organizations. These organizations allow libraries to apply for grants, materials, and training in order to better serve their communities. They help libraries provide high quality services to their patrons. Passing this bill sets a dangerous precedent for the government to intercede in professional affiliations and interferes in the right to assemble. This not only threatens libraries, but any organization that relies on local, regional, or national expertise and networking to improve services and receive grants. This goes against the right to assemble and the right for intellectual freedom. This bill will harm library services, cut funding, and hurt underfunded communities who rely on the library for access to factual information, computers, internetaccess, community enrichment, and so much more than just books.I urge you to support libraries and Iowa's communities and vote NO on this bill.

02-24-2025

Julir Carr

VOTE NO! This bill hurts all Iowans, you know, the ones you are supposed to represent?? Public libraries serve everyone, and as a nonprofit organization, you are doing a huge disservice to every constituent. Cutting funding that allows open access to materials and grants because an entity belongs to professional organizations that advocate for their wellbeing? Assinine. It appears the majority of lobbyists oppose approving this too, yet here we are entertaining suppressing access to information. Shameful.

02-24-2025

Diana Von Stein

Please support continued state funding for libraries. Libraries are essential community hubs that provide a wide range of services for people of all ages and backgrounds. They promote literacy, foster lifelong learning, and provide free access to vital resources such as books, computers, and educational programs.In an era of increasing information access and digital needs, libraries serve as key equalizers, offering resources to those who may not have access to them otherwise. They also support job seekers, students, and entrepreneurs by providing access to research tools, career resources, and educational support.Investing in libraries is not only an investment in education and public access, but also in the longterm prosperity of our state. Libraries empower individuals, strengthen communities, and contribute to the economy.I strongly encourage you to consider the longterm benefits of state funding for libraries and the positive impact it has on our citizens and future generations.Thank you for your time and consideration.

02-24-2025

Jen Ferguson

Please vote no on SF238. Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional; it violates the principle of free association. This bill removes funding from libraries who are members of the American Library Association, Association of Small & Rural Libraries, Medical Library Association, American Association of Law Libraries, Chief Operating Officers of State Library Associations, American Theological Library Association, and the Iowa Library Association. These associations help bring millions of dollars in library funding to Iowa from the federal government. They are also the professional associations that libraries and their staff rely on for professional development and peer collaboration.This bill would hurt libraries and therefore would hurt Iowans.

02-24-2025

Elizabeth Kensak

Please vote No on SF 238. I live in small town Iowa and our public library provides needed resources and services to our area. I was a trustee on the library board for 12 years, so I know how important these funds are to the services we provide to our rural community.

02-24-2025

Jan Clarke

I vehemently oppose SF238, which is a thinly veiled attempt to control the books that can be on the shelves in libraries across Iowa. Book bans, in whatever form they take, have no place in a constitutional republic. I urge you to vote NO.

02-24-2025

Andrew Rogers

I oppose this bill. Very few people in the state of IA are asking for these restrictions on libraries. You all have a job to do. There are hungry children and families, people homeless, people who cant afford healthcare, people working full time and still cannot get out of poverty or support their family. Stop focusing on limiting libraries and do your job to improve peoples lives in the state of IA!

02-24-2025

Katie Peterson

I oppose this bill. Libraries require access to higher level organizations like the American Library Association to be able to provide their staff with the professional development that they need in order to better serve their patrons. Passing this bill will be doing a huge disservice to all Iowans.

02-24-2025

Heather Campbell

This is an unconstitutional bill that would not only impact membership in the American Library Association and Iowa Library Association, but other associations such as the Association of Rural and Small Libraries, the Association of Research Libraries, and the American Theological Library Association. It would set a dangerous precedent of the state violating the right to free association.

02-24-2025

Benjamin Langton

Vote NO Support Iowas Libraries and CommunitiesLibraries play a vital role in making Iowa communities stronger, more productive, and more resilient. They drive economic growth by offering job search assistance, connecting small businesses with critical resources, and supporting lifelong learning to help Iowans develop new skills.In todays digital economy, access to online services is essentialbut many Iowans lack internet or computer access at home. Libraries bridge this gap, ensuring everyone has the tools they need to participate and succeed.Beyond education and economic development, libraries serve as community hubs, bringing people together in good times and providing essential resources to help communities rebuild during difficult times.Investing in libraries means investing in our communities. Protect these vital resourcesvote NO.

02-24-2025

Jess Netolicky

I strongly oppose the proposed legislation that would disqualify libraries from membership in the Association of Small and Rural Libraries, the Iowa Library Association, the American Library Association, and other professional networks that provide crucial training and support benefiting the public. This bill not only weakens the collaborative efforts essential for library growth and sustainability but also infringes on First Amendment rights, particularly the freedom of association. By redefining what constitutes an 'eligible public library' to exclude those that pay dues to state or national nonprofit organizations, this legislation aims to restrict libraries access to critical resources, education, and professional support. Libraries are vital to community engagement and information access, and they should not be punished for participating in organizations that strengthen their services. Limiting library memberships in this way undermines their effectiveness and threatens their fundamental rights. The ability to associate with groups that advocate for better library services is a key aspect of democratic engagement. I urge lawmakers to reject this bill and uphold the essential role libraries play in our communities and in protecting free speech and association.

02-24-2025

Danielle Benford

Our public libraries should be funded and available to the residents of Iowa. Many people, including children, would not have access to materials if we defund our libraries and put penalties upon them. Please do not remove funding for our libraries and allow them to operate as they have faithfully done for years in this State. Stop trying to control every aspect of our lives and give us the freedom that you say we have all the time.

02-24-2025

Brittney Lerner

02-25-2025

Veronica Ruse

It saddens me that the Iowa legislature remains determined to defund our public libraries. Public libraries are a public good and I truly do not understand why the legislature has chosen to attack public libraries. The bill is clearly retaliatory in nature and again I am saddened that our legislature is choosing to withhold funds from public libraries due to a public librarys support of the Iowa Library Association. Professional organizations like ILA provide crucial opportunities for support, networking, and continuing education for those in the library profession. I question why the legislature is determined to run off our devoted public servants, underfund our public institutions, and throttle professional development opportunities for librarians. The sad part is that it is the community members who will suffer when their public libraries reduce staff, cut hours, and cannot purchase new books due to a lack of funding.

02-25-2025

Grace Rogers

Vote NO for SF 238. Libraries are NOT the reason I'm afraid to send my children out into the world. DO BETTER, IOWA. Feed the hungry, house the homeless, do ANYTHING to reduce gun violence. Just STOP sucking up to BILLIONAIRES who neither care about you nor your constituents.

02-25-2025

Abigail Sitzmann

Vote NO on this bill! Notice the term "Enrich Iowa." Libraries enrich our communities. Library associations support libraries to do that job better through networking and professional development. Don't threaten funding for these vital organizations because they interact with the broader professional community.

02-25-2025

Sarah Heilman

Vote NO! Legislating against a membership organization based on viewpoint is unconstitutional and unacceptable. It violates the principle of free association, a cherished and protected right in our democracy. This legislation would impact the ability of libraries across the state to benefit from professional organizations such as the Iowa Library Association, Association of Small and Rural Libraries, Medical Library Association, American Association of Law Libraries, Association of Research Libraries, Chief Operating Officers of State Library Associations, American Theological Library Association, and American Library Association. These professional associations help bring millions of dollars in library aid to Iowa from the federal government. These associations offer grant opportunities and professional development to libraries and library workers and improve services provided to the public. Penalizing individuals or institutions for joining or participating in the activities of a professional organization goes against the values of free thought, inquiry, and the collective improvement of our society.

02-25-2025

Jackie Chow

I oppose this bill, please vote NO on this bill. It helps nobody and hurts everyone. Why do you hate Iowans so much? Please focus on bills that actually address real problems and will help people. You are wasting our taxpayer money on these ridiculous bills. I mourn my state and miss the days when our lawmakers valued free expression and held space for many viewpoints.

02-25-2025

Nancy Gregory

I strongly urge you to vote no on SF 238. If it passes, our libraries will lose vital funds that provide materials and services to everyone in the community, in addition to the loss of opportunities for professional development that help ensure our libraries are providing the best possible resources for all Iowans. Public libraries are essential to so many people. We need to be able to visit a library for books, research, computer access, job applications, community connections, shelter, and more. VOTE NO.

02-25-2025

Sara Konen

As a stay at home mom who often uses the library please vote this down. It is essential for community and the prosperity of that community. It has been an invaluable resource to me in many different towns with our frequent moving and a place of refuge , respite and hope to the many who frequent their resources.

02-25-2025

Emily Christensen

WOW! Libraries are truly under attack. Libraries do so much for communities we give out food and snacks to fight insecurity; we provide a safe place for unhoused to come in from the cold; we offer educational programs; we provide space for teachers to tutor students; we help bridge summer slide with school age students with our summer programming; we provide story time where young children come to play and sing; we offer STEAM programs for school age children; we have computer access for those seeking jobs, etc.; we offer free wifi. The list goes on and on. VOTE NO!!!! You are damaging Iowa with this bill. Please learn about all the things your library offers. Libraries are essential to Iowa communities. By removing funding you take away libraries ability to support Iowans. Vote NO!

02-25-2025

Justina Meek

Vote no! Libraries shouldn't be punished for being connected to organizations deemed too liberal or radical. They do not advocate for obscenities, they advocate for parents to parent their children and for the general public to have access to what information they may need. Not only are libraries underfunded, but Enrich Iowa and organizations such as the American Library Association both support libraries financially through grants and other funds!

02-25-2025

Elizabeth Schechinger

Vote No on SF 238. Libraries do more than provide reading materials to their community. There are enrichment and educational activities for people of all ages and interests. Most of these activities are free to members of their community. Libraries can provide access to technology and equipment that members of the community can use to grow skills and even help them find jobs that they might not have been able to afford to do themselves. Nonprofit organizations like ILA, ALA, and others help libraries and librarians to serve their community better. With out access to that network, Iowa will surely suffer. VOTE NO.

02-25-2025

Kristi Peters

VOTE NO!! Libraries are not just books. They provide programs for all ages and needs. From early childhood literacy to the adult program about scams targeting seniors, the library is a source of information and support. In our community, the library provided job hunting and resume assistance to those who lost their job when one of our largest employers closed. These vital roles rely on well trained professional librarians. Professional organizations provide extended training and networking to further the skills and knowledge of the librarian. These organizations expand the abilities of librarians and ultimately enrich our communities. After all, would you want to go to a doctor who only had the knowledge he had when he graduated medical school.

02-25-2025

John Kenyon

Please vote NO on this unnecessary, punitive legislation. Do not move it out of committee.Bill sponsors claim this is about keeping kids safe. It will do no such thing. As a matter of fact, it will harm them, because libraries will no longer be a place of refuge, a place to learn about the world, a way to develop empathy that will make them better citizens of the world.Libraries are our most important, vital public institutions, and membership in organizations like ILA and ALA allow them to pursue continuing education, learn best practices, and yes, speak with a collective voice on important issues of the day. The only reason to pursue legislation like this is because at the moment, that advocacy is in opposition much of the Republican agenda. Instead of a foolhardy attempt to quiet that opposition, perhaps take a deeper look at your values and explore why it may be that you are in opposition to the most welcoming, nurturing institutions in your communities.To deny libraries the right to freely associate with these organizations is to be petty and spiteful (not to mention unConstitutional). That can be the only goal. Librarians aren't suddenly going to be in favor of stifling marginalized voices simply because they aren't a part of a statewide or national group. This sort of legislation can't be relegated to the dustbin of history soon enough, and its an embarrassing wait until saner minds prevail.

02-25-2025

Megan Dial-Lapcewich

Please vote no on this bill. It would only damage our public libraries, which I am sure cannot be your goal for what person ever wants to be on the side of history that works against libraries and free access to information? Listen to the vast majority of your constituents, who you all work for and who are urging you to stop this bill and the other proposed state antilibrary bills

02-25-2025

Rosalyn De Koster

Public Libraries are a gift to all individuals and should be places of safety where ideas can be tested and explored and considered. We need them to be open places that challenge us and encourage us to think about the world in broad terms. Limiting them because they may have materials that you do not like is not constitutional. If you don't like a book or a movie or a resource don't check it out. If you don't want your kids to have access to a book or a movie or a resource then either don't take your kids to the library or don't let your kids check it out. You already have the choice.Since this is a Republicanled bill, let me just note that the party of local control and of parental choice, seems to want to limit my ability and my local libraries to make choices. I'm not okay with that.

02-25-2025

Mark Isham

Public libraries serve everyone's right to read, to think, to speak, and to act freely. It is part of their mission to support organizations which also support freedom of thought and access to information. Any law which seeks to curb libraries in their support for freedom of thought and speech goes against their basic purpose. Please oppose restrictions on the organizations which libraries can belong to in supporting their mission.

02-25-2025

Sue Woody

Please vote NO on this bill. Libraries across the state rely on Enrich Iowa funding to provide valuable programs and services for our individual communities. Tying funding to participation with advocacy groups such as ILA, PLA, and ALA does not make sense. Such advocacy groups provide fantastic opportunities for professional development and peer support. It's the space librarians go to learn about new programs and gain the knowledge to share with their patrons on such important issues as AI, literacy initiatives like the Science of Reading, and a wide variety of programming ideas for adults, teens and children. Thank you for voting no.

02-25-2025

Janice Smith

I am a retired librarian with more than thirty years of experience. I joined the American Library Association while still in library school, and joined the state library association as well. Continuing education opportunities, a grant to attend the state conference while I was in library school, networking with colleagues were all invaluable.In Palaces for the People, Sociologist Eric Klinenberg, (taking for the title a phrase from Andrew Carnegie) believes that the future of democratic societies rests not simply on shared values but on shared spaces, including public libraries. In a time of deep divisions and polarization at a level not seen since the Civil War, public libraries can and should bring us together to find common ground.Unfortunately, Iowa legislators have chosen to increase the polarization by penalizing librarians and libraries and by falsely claiming that the national and state library associations have some kind of extremist political agenda. I would counter that book banning deprives Iowa youth the opportunity to read books where they can see themselves in those books.Librarians are highly trained in book selection. We need libraries to be places that bring people together, not places that ban books and programs and memberships that a minority of individuals and groups and legislators find objectionable because of their rightwing agendas.

02-25-2025

Dawnye Sturtz

I strongly oppose SF 238. PUBLIC libraries are for the PUBLIC, and it is shocking that we have Iowa legislators willing to not support them. Funds are often tight for rural libraries, and we should be providing more assistance for them to ensure we have EDUCATED Iowans. Please allow all public libraries to continue receiving assistance under the Enrich Iowa program.

02-25-2025

Kathleen Thomas [Citizen]

Punishing libraries and their freedom of speech, by cutting ANY kind of funding is violating every single person's right, who use a library. It is beyond comprehension that one group of people have the right to police other groups of people and their choices. Do something to help every single Iowan. Stop targeting individuals or groups whose beliefs are different from yours. This is wrong. It's unconstitutional with what is going on in Iowa. From women's rights, to voting rights, to freedom to choose, feeding and educating our children... and only when it is the choice with which our governor agrees. It's punishing people for having a different opinion.

02-25-2025

Marta Nelson

I am strongly against this bill. It is vital for libraries to network in order to learn, share information and stay abreast of developments related to their operation. Adults have no business deciding for other adult what they can read. If you don't look what is in the library, don't check it out! Let people decide for themselves. We need to stop busybodies from meddling in other people's lives.

02-25-2025

JENNIFER COVILL

Leave our public libraries alone and vote NO to HF284 and SF 238. This is a free speech issue. Stop pushing your personal agendas on the public. We do not agree on this issue. Libraries share information which is essential to a well educated society. You do not have to read what is made available. That is the luxury of freedom, which we still have in this country. This infringes on our Constitutional rights.

02-25-2025

Arie Sirotiak

I strongly oppose SF 238, which would hurt the ability of all Iowan libraries to benefit from professional organizations that are helping them receive millions of dollars of library aid. These organizations provide grant opportunities and professional development and help libraries to better serve the public. Denying funds to libraries based on their affiliation with these professional organizations violates the rights of freedom of speech and freedom of association. This legislation and other bills like HF 284 and SF 235 are blatant attempts to restrict Iowans freedoms from a government that should be focused on helping its people.

02-25-2025

Lori Ziegenhorn

This is not a legislative issue. Libraries serve all people and gain knowledge and experience from others in the field. Do not pass this restrictive bill. Let libraries and librarians do their work without legislative punishment. Please vote No

02-25-2025

Lizbeth McDermott

Why would you further tie the hands of public libraries (who are the backbone of our communities) and make it more difficult for them to find funding? Your policing by legislation is a fascist tactic and I can't figure out what you are so afraid of. Knowledge? Ideas that differ from yours? So far we are still a free society. Please vote no on HF284 and SF238.

02-25-2025

Sharon Dendurent

Vote NO on SF238. Stop trying to control our libraries and what we can read. It's obvious that libraries must continue to stand up to negativity and politicalization of their mission, as well as continuing to educating the public about their purpose. Therefore, it is undemocratic to deny state funds to libraries who are members of the selfhelp organizations that seek to support libraries. This proposed law is a violation of free speech and free association and should be voted down immediately. This is nothing but discrimination plain and simple to force libraries to bend to the will of the state. Our libraries need to remain independent of government interference.

02-25-2025

Liz King

Please vote NO on this bill that would reduce funding to Iowa Libraries who serve all residents of Iowa. Professional organizations provide educational resources and networking opportunities for medical professionals, lawyers, fundraisers, teachers, city administrators and policymakers to name a few. Please do not punish library staff members for pursuing excellence with the assistance of professional organizations.

02-25-2025

Elsabeth Hepworth

Cutting funding for rural library memberships in state and national library associations would severely harm vital community hubs across our state. It would mean: Rural libraries would lose their voice in state and national governments, impacting funding and laws that affect them. Library staff would lose access to training, expert advice, and shared resources, making it harder to offer uptodate services. Rural libraries would be cut off from networks of other libraries, limiting collaboration and the sharing of best practices. Fewer services and a wider digital divide: with Iowans in rural areas paying more for slower internet speeds, libraries would struggle to provide the resources and technology access their communities need, especially in areas with limited internet.Please vote no to SF 238 because Iowa's rural libraries and the communities they serve have the most to lose.

02-25-2025

Janet Norris

Our local libraries utilize Enrich Iowa money every year to do things for the public, like programs, summer activities, adding extra services. Over the years it has provided drinking fountains, lighting, backpacks, and so much more.As a Library Board member, I am urging you to NOT SUPPORT THIS BILL.

02-25-2025

Jan Netoliocky

The hundreds of comments submitted by concerned citizens should resonate with you, the governing body elected to serve the people of this state. The overwhelming majority of citizens who took the time to note their perspectives are speaking as with one voice. They implore you, as do I, to vote no.

02-25-2025

Joa LaVille

These are the professional associations of librarians, like lawyers belong to the American Bar Association or doctors belong to the American Medical Association. Whats next? Outlawing attending professional conferences? Why the attack on librarianship? Vote no on this bill.

02-25-2025

Kim Kietzman

Removing state funding provided in exchange for services libraries provide that extends service across the state is shortsighted. If this funding is removed, libraries will no longer see any compelling reason to continue to do so. There are few professional associations for librarians. None of them dictate local policy, communities do that through community members on appointed library boards.

02-25-2025

Kate Garretson

I am firmly against this bill as a mother, Iowan, and librarian. It is unconstitutional and unacceptable to legislate against a membership organization based on viewpoint. It blatantly violates the principle of free association, which is an important part of a strong republic. This serves no purpose other than to kill rural libraries who already struggle to serve their vulnerable communities.

02-25-2025

Hayley Jackson

The American Library Association is the professional assocation for librariansm. Membership provides librarians to professional development, program grant funds, and other tools that help them serve their communities. This bill will needlessly hamper the work of public librarians across the state and be detrimental to their communities.

02-25-2025

Laura Matter

As an educator that went to IOWA who fell in love with books at a young age at my local library and a frequent user of libraries to this day, this is a horrific bill. It will silence critical voices for IOWAs residents. Libraries should be havens for information and safe spaces.

02-25-2025

Jess Saunders Saunders

Sure! Heres a more concise version for a public comment:I strongly oppose HF284. My family visits our public library every week because it provides essential resources, programs, and a sense of community. This bill would strip libraries of funding and professional support, hurting Iowans who rely on them. It is not the governments job to regulate what my family chooses to readdoing so violates free speech. I urge you to vote no on HF284 to protect Iowas libraries and the communities they serve.

02-25-2025

Gene Lucht

Please vote no on this bill. I find it bizarre that you don't want libraries to join a professional organization. We don't apply that requirement to legislators or really just about anyone else. This would lead to the closure of rural libraries and be detrimental to towns across the state.

02-25-2025

Wendy Street

I urge you to vote NO on this bill. I am a rural resident who relies on Open Access and interlibrary loan to meet my reading needs. If you restrict funding for those services, you deny my access to the library services I value.

02-25-2025

Melanie Ruhaak Ruhaak

I encourage you to vote NO. This is government overreach. Librarians are more than capable of doing their jobs, and parents can make decisions for their own children. Our libraries are crucial for communities especially communities such as mine in council bluffs. This bill will weaken libraries!

02-25-2025

Eric Jennings

Please vote no. Penalizing constituents by going after organizations that benefit Iowans is not what legislators should focus on. Libraries and their staff benefit by their professional associations through training & professional development as well as by bringing in dollars to their libraries.

02-25-2025

Jessica Reuter

Please protect libraries and VOTE NO on SF 238! Libraries are vital to our communities and provide essential services to people from all walks of life. Our libraries are already underfunded and undersupported. It's unacceptable to limit or punish them because they contain materials that you do not like or do not agree with. Libraries should be places of learning, growth, and inclusion, not political pawns.

02-26-2025

Melissa Koch

Please vote NO on SF238. This legislation is government overreach and autocratic. Let local communities decide what membership organizations their libraries should be a part of. Library membership associations, such as the American Library Association and Association of Small & Rural Libraries, help bring millions of dollars in library funding to Iowa. They also provide the professional development and peer collaboration that library staff need to effectively serve their communities. Vote NO on SF238.

02-26-2025

Wendy Phillips

Public libraries are the last bastion of democracy. They are the peoples university. They provide citizens with lifelong learning opportunities, regardless of socioeconomic status or ability to pay. They are a generous and positive asset to our communities. To deny funding for programs and materials that contribute to the welfare of Iowa citizens simply because you object to a small portion of the librarys holdings is a needlessly selfdestructive overreaction. Librarians are professionals, trained to select and provide materials for diverse members of the community. Not all materials will be suitable for all patrons, but everyone deserves the right to find the materials that meet their own interests and needs. Parents have the authority and responsibility to monitor and guide what their children read, view, or listen to. It is not the States responsibility or right to dictate what is appropriate for citizens in a free and open society.

02-26-2025

Steve Hanken

Libraries in Iowa have been free since the beginning, they were organized around "local control" same as the school boards, and this has worked well, with established policies that are agreeable tothe citizenry that support these entities with tax dollars. I don't invade the Pella Library about what they do, and I don't expect Pella to invade my library as to how our library is run. I don't want my librarian sued because someone finds she didn't take a book off the shelf that someone in the state legislature thinks should not be there anymore than I think it right and proper to withold tax dollars that are paid to support libraries for any reason other than no library exists. Libraries are not a political football, they exist to improve the knowledge base of anyone intent on doing so in whatever field they choose. It is simply an issue of freedom, first and foremost, and I would include it in our Freedom of Speech! Authors and writers of books are free to express their thoughts and ideas on any subject, Readers should be free to enjoy whatever the local library board decides is appropriate. This is what "Enrich Iowa" was designed for, not witholding funds to achieve this! Censorship by witholding funds is still censorship! There is a way these questions are addressed locally and that should be sufficent. If other organizations want to assist it should not be the responsibility of the State to interfere in that by witholding of funds as punishment.

02-26-2025

Jean Strable

I have worked in public libraries in five states over 37 years and never experienced the extreme level of hostile legislative attempts like this bill. It is written to remove the right to read and right to information. This legislation is trying to break an institution that isn't broken that provides access to a wide variety of topics and information to all.This bill is disturbing because it would eliminate libraries' funding from the federal government funneled through the State Library of Iowa if the library pays dues to our professional organizations (American Library Association, Iowa Library Association, Association for Rural & Small Libraries, etc.) that are considered advocacy organizations. These are the organizations who create the guidelines to support our work and to help ensure the freedoms to read, view, have privacy of your borrowing record, have materials representing all people and viewpoints, provide staff training, etc. Vote no.

02-26-2025

Bryan Davis

This bill to starve public libraries of state funding for defending the publics right to know is immoral, violates the constitutional right of freedom to read and is a clear attempt to impose the views on one group in society on whole communities. Public libraries are funded by all taxpayers and their mission is to provide an inclusive information environment for all citizens. Inclusive is not a dirty word. Inclusion is a fundamental principle of the American way of life. America was founded by immigrants, many of whom were being systematically excluded from their European societies for opinions unpopular at the time but which are mainstream now. Like Methodism, for example. In that spirit, public libraries are dedicated to the proposition that open minded access to a wide range of ideas and viewpoints is vital to a free nation. Even if some of those viewpoints are offensive to me personally, they have the right to be there. The Iowa Library Association and the American Library Association are solid, patriotic organizations that have always defended the rights of you and me to read, speak and think for ourselves based on reliable information. SF 238 should be rejected.

02-26-2025

Ashley Jennings

I strongly oppose SF238, a blatant attempt to censor libraries and punish institutions that do not conform to this administration's political agenda. This bill is not about "local control"it is about silencing libraries that uphold intellectual freedom, professional standards, and the right of individuals to access diverse information.Public libraries serve all members of the community, not just those who align with a particular ideology. Cutting off funding for libraries affiliated with the American Library Association and the Iowa Library Association is an attempt to control what information people can access. It sets a dangerous precedent, signaling that any institution refusing to comply with political demands will be defunded. This is a step toward authoritarianism.The ALA and ILA provide essential resources, training, and professional guidance that help libraries serve their communities effectively. Stripping funding from libraries based on their association with these organizations will only harm local communities, particularly in rural areas where public libraries are a vital source of education and connection.Iowa lawmakers should be protecting access to knowledge, not restricting it. I urge legislators to reject SF238 and any similar efforts to politicize our public institutions. The future of free thought and democratic values depends on it.

02-26-2025

Lyndsie Pitzenberger

Please vote no on this bill. These funds are put to good use serving Iowans. Restricting librarians from belonging to their professional organizations is wrong. These organizations provide professional development, resources, grants, and other supports that libraries rely on to better serve their communities. Please spend time researching these issues and speak with the people who know what is happening in libraries librarians before creating legislation that will only have a negative impact on Iowans.

02-26-2025

Steve Frevert

Public libraries are a bedrock institution in Iowa and across the country. It is unconscionable that the legislature would restrict their ability to provide services for ALL Iowans for radical right posturing. Protect our libraries and the free flow of ideas and information. Kill this repugnant bill.

02-26-2025

Toni Allen

OPPOSED to SF 238. There is undoubtedly some cognitive dissonance between how public libraries see their role in serving the public and how one or the other party may see that role. I do not see any benefit in playing ping pong with these valuable public servants and how they do their jobs over the span of changing administrations. Let them help the public. They do it so beautifully.

02-26-2025

Lisa Martincik

Libraries have contributed incalculable good to the communities of Iowa, and deserve the support to continue that high level of service. Simply visiting some of the many libraries throughout Iowa would beat this out. Please stop attacking this cornerstone of democracy and throw SF 238 into the circular file.

02-26-2025

Blakely Mortvedt

Please vote against this bill. Libraries are a valuable resource and books on a wide variety of topics should be available. If you dont like it, dont check it out. But stop taking the freedom to choose away from people / parents. Also, in the age of internet, its a ridiculous assumption that kids wont be able to find the same information, and much more, online.

02-26-2025

Chris Campbell

Ill start off with a quote:I am touching base to share some recent ILA EB history as well as an update about the Iowa 496 case.For nearly a year, the Iowa Library Association has been quietly working with Random Penguin House and the ACLU of Iowa to provide intel, seek plaintiffs, and promote their work in area media.Those are the words of the ILA. The ILA likes to promote itself in public as politically neutral and nothing more than an advocate for libraries and equal access to all points of view. In private, it says things that completely contradict its public statements. Things like, libraries should be sites for socialist organizing. (Drabinski)In the case I just referenced, the ILA astroturfed a campaign against SF496 by searching for plaintiffs to sue the state, and worked against what the majority of Iowans voted for. It hired a law firm to file an amicus brief in the case that it worked to help Penguin Random House file. Who provided the money for the ILA to do what it did? If youre a taxpayer, YOU DID!In Ames, and I suspect other places in Iowa, public dollars fund ALA memberships, conference tickets, travel, hotels, meals on the road, etc. Is that even legal? Iowa Code 68A.505 prohibits the use of public moneys for political purposes. Considering how political the ILA is, Im not sure how those can be reconciled.When most Iowans advocate for or against legislation, we dont get to use public moneys to do it, but the ILA does. If the ILA wants to advocate for leftwing extremism, its free to do so, but it shouldnt be able to pick taxpayers pockets to do it. Vote yes on this bill.

02-26-2025

Carolyn Stephenson

This proposed bill is a direct attack on the First Amendment, threatening public libraries if they use library funding to belong to professional associations that defend the First Amendment against legislation such as this.

02-26-2025

ERIN OHRLUND

Being part of an organization that promotes library freedom should not preclude state assistance for public libraries. This bill is yet another attempt to foist political ideology and impede the work of public libraries that serve all people.