Andrew Ritland
As the Mahaska County Attorney, I oppose any further reductions in the duration of probation. Longterm probation is a critical tool in reducing recidivism and promoting public safety. In my judicial district, judges typically impose five years of probation for felony convictions, the maximum allowed under 907.7(1). However, it is rare for individuals to serve the full term, as the Department of Corrections (DOC) frequently seeks early discharges under 907.9(2) after individuals have completed just half of their probation period.The proposed legislation, however, introduces credit provisions that could reduce probation by up to 40% (Page 2, Line 35), irrespective of the offense. Alarmingly, these credits would apply even to those convicted of sex offenses and violent crimes. Under this bill, a person could potentially complete felony probation in as little as 14 months for these offenses.Moreover, I have talked to those who supervise probationers who believe that the reporting requirements on Page 2, Line 25 would create significant administrative burdens and distract probation officers from their core public safety mission.The court already has the ability to make casebycase determinations for early discharges under 907.9(2). Adding acrosstheboard credits is not only unnecessary but also jeopardizes public safety. It erodes the accountability and oversight provided by probation, especially for serious offenses where extended supervision is essential for rehabilitation and the protection of the community.
Print
Permanent Link