Meeting Public Comments

Meeting informations are as follows:
Date: Tuesday, February 11, 2025
Time: 9:00 AM - 10:30 AM
Location: RM 103
Names and comments are public records. Remaining information is considered a confidential record.
Comments Submitted:

02-10-2025
Cassie Beaver
You need to strongly reconsider this law. 16 and 17 years are not capable of giving high quality care to children in child development centers. With ratios growing and the 16 and 17 years not understanding the development of young children.For someone who has been in the file for 15 plus years, it makes me feel like my years of education and trainings mean nothing for my professional job. More and more children and family will be hurt by this choice then helped.
02-10-2025
Jeannine Laughlin
Please vote NO on HSB 8. Iowa has come so far in legislation for the early childhood education and protecting the health, education and well being of the children in early childhood programs. We want to make sure we are providing high quality child care to stimulate brain development and have the safest environments for our youngest children. Child care is not babysitting. When we start to allow teenagers to care and educate our young children, we are subjecting the early childhood profession to the image of babysitters. It is also of great concern that early childhood programs using underage "children" as caregivers are not able to sustain the necessary insurance they need to run their businesses. This legislation would also place undue liability on young aspiring child care professionals.
02-10-2025
Tiffany Welch
I urge a NO vote on HSB 8. I am grateful the state is pursuing ways to try to help access to child care, but having 16 and 17 year olds watching kids, even for a short periods of time, unsupervised is dangerous and makes the aspiring professional care giver less likely to succeed. There are insurance problems, and ultimately, this would lower the quality of care and make quality care less accessible.
02-10-2025
Jessi Balk
As a mother and a former childcare provider, I have firsthand experience in nurturing and educating young children, particularly those aged zero to twelve. My time in this role has taught me that effective early childhood education requires not only a foundational understanding of child development but also a deep awareness of the emotional and mental health challenges that young children can face. For instance, children experiencing separation anxiety or other mental health crises need caregivers who are equipped with the knowledge and skills to support them through these difficult moments.The proposed legislation, HSB 8, would impose significant liabilities on aspiring childcare professionals, which could deter passionate individuals from entering the field. This would exacerbate the existing shortage of qualified caregivers and make it increasingly difficult for childcare centers to obtain insurance coverage. Ultimately, this would jeopardize the quality of care that our youngest children receive, as they are in critical stages of development during these formative years.It is essential that we prioritize the wellbeing and education of our children by supporting policies that enhance, rather than hinder, the quality of childcare services in Iowa.
02-10-2025
Tabitha Simms-Quigley
As a mom, aunt, and community member, I'm strongly against HSB 8. 16 year olds shouldn't be shouldered with the responsibly of unsupervised care of children, even in short time frames. Even the most welltrained 16 year old child working in a caregiving role needs to have help. Knowing how quickly things go from fine to lifethreatening is enough to keep this age out of the workforce, not expanding the workforce. I have heard this is similar to life guarding.With all due respect, this is very different. Life guards are there for life saving, but every pool I've been in requires care givers to be within arms length. A 16 year old child care worker is engaging with children, and also responsible for saving a life. That's too much to do unsupervised. Thank you
02-11-2025
Paige Chickering [Save the Children Action Network]
I strongly urge this committee to vote NO on HSB 8. I am grateful that Governor Reynolds has elevated the issue of child care this year and that the Iowa legislature is seriously considering the challenges that this industry faces in our state. However detracting from the quality of care we provide for our youngest learners seems like a poor solution to the problems we face. After discussing this proposed legislation with many child care center directors it is clear that this legislation will make their jobs harder not easier. Canters that have young teenagers working in them want to encourage participation in the child care workforce which is already a huge challenge for this industry that greatly impacts availability of child care slots. If a problem were to rapidly arise, as they often do with young children, while a 16 year old was watching up to 4 infants with no supervision it could be catastrophic to that youth's future. Furthermore centers have concerns over their how this would impact their insurance that have yet to be addressed and parents have shared concerns for the safety of their young children. This bill could have far reaching negative impacts on our child care system. I urge you to consider the concerns of your constituents in this profession before moving this legislation forward. Thank you.