Meeting Public Comments

Subcommittee meeting and times are as follows:
Attendance at subcommittee meetings by lobbyists and the public is via zoom or in-person. See agenda for zoom details. Only authenticated users are permitted access.
A bill for an act relating to student eligibility requirements in school district, accredited nonpublic school, charter school, community college, and regent institution athletics based on sex.(See SF 2342.)
Subcommittee members: Goodwin-CH, Celsi, Cournoyer, Quirmbach, Sinclair
Date: Thursday, February 17, 2022
Time: 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM
Location: Room 24
Comments Submitted:
The purpose of comments is to provide information to members of the subcommittee.
Names and comments are public records. Remaining information is considered a confidential record.

02-16-2022
Melissa Sternhagen [St. Paul Congregational United Church of Christ]
February 16, 2022To the Members of the Senate Education Committee:I am a called and ordained clergy person in the United Church of Christ. I am also a responsible adult. As such, I take seriously the call to protect and advocate for the most vulnerable among us. I am reminded of how the writer of Psalm 82 calls God to "defend the weak and the parentless; uphold the cause of the poor and the oppressed. Certainly such a call is not simply meant to concern God alone. It is meant to be a concern of Gods people as well.To be sure, our sacred texts speak plainly about the way in which we are to treat one another. We are to love one another as ourselves, we are to recognize the image of the Divine in one another, and we are to protect the most vulnerable among us. Our trans and nonbinary youth and young adults are some of the most vulnerable amongs us in the state of Iowa. I am writing in hope that you will join me in protecting them from the damaging details and provisions that comprise SSB 3146.According to January 2022 data from The Trevor Project, 85% of trans and nonbinary young people reported that following recent news about issues that impact the transgender community has negatively impacted their mental health. If it is true that participation in sports can and does have a positive impact on the selfesteem and mental health of young people, why would the focus be on limiting or eliminating participation for such a vulnerable population? Trans and nonbinary young people are effectively denied the opportunity to participate in school sports at all just as soon as you deny them the opportunity to play on sports teams that align with their gender identity. Which, of course, means that they are also denied the positive impacts mentioned above. Meanwhile, cisgender young people continue to enjoy the positive impacts of participation in sports.Beyond all of the statistics and the quoted scripture, one thing remains sure: For generations we have been discriminating against vulnerable and marginalized people, and for generations we have been getting it wrong. First it was preventing Black people from full participation in sports, then it was women, and then it was gay and lesbian athletes. We continue to be content to discriminate and damage the most vulnerable among us based on a fear or a lack of understanding of the differences that exist in humanity as well as the notion that difference, when included, spoils the experience for others. My siblings, this cannot continue to be so.As a pastor, as a responsible adult, and as a fellow human being, I implore this Senate Education committee to focus its attention on Iowa's slipping educational ranking and its underfunded public schools. I implore this committee to remember the call to love one another as you love yourselves. I implore you to protect some of the most vulnerable among us by refusing to send SSB 3146 beyond your committee for a vote.Sincerely,Rev. Melissa R. SternhagenPastor, St. Paul Congregational United Church of ChristOskaloosa, IA
Attachment
02-16-2022
Martha Shaw []
I strongly oppose SSB 3146. Sports participation should not be banned for transgender girls or for anyone else. It harkens back to the days when People of Color and women were banned from sports because they would somehow "ruin it". Transgender girls come in all shapes and sizes, just like all people do. They make up a very, very small percentage of athletes. There are so many more important things happening in Iowa that desperately need attention focusing on this is theatrics. Period.
02-16-2022
Terry Heller []
Trans girls participating in sports is a vanishingly small problem that really does not need legislative attention. School officials are perfectly capable of handling problems should any occur. It would make sense to consider legislation were school officials asking the state for guidance. In fact, they seem to be asking instead that you restrain the drive for legislation at this time.My main question, then, is why the rush?What evidence is there that this is a problem to be "nipped in the bud?"I wish I could persuade myself that raising this question has better motives than political grandstanding for rallying a base, but I'm sorry to say that's what it looks like.
02-16-2022
Jennifer Meyer []
I strongly SSB 3146 on multiple levels. Firstly, all children deserve equitable access to sports without fiscrimination, including trans children. Secondly, I find the idea that trans girls would automatically outcompete cis girls in sports to be very insulting as though the training and skill of an individual didn't matter. Thirdly, the speed at which this legislation is progressing leaves little room for feedback. I am sure that is intentional, but it is also very undemocratic.
02-16-2022
Lisa Lima [Democratic Chair of Pottawattamie County]
As a mother of trans children, I oppose this bill that is discriminatory and harmful. Transgender girls ARE girls, transgender women ARE women, transgender boys ARE boys, and transgender men ARE men. They are not "other." Only 1% of a school's population will have trans athletes, therefore there is no real argument that they are taking opportunities away from cisgender students.
02-16-2022
Ella Slade []
This quote is taken directly from the ACLU of Iowa website: Myth: Trans girls shouldn't participate in girls' and women's athletics because it will ruin those sports for others.There is a long history of excluding people from sports because they're different and because they would "spoil" sports: 70 years ago Black people were excluded from sports for that same reason. 50 years ago women were excluded from sports programs. More recently, there has been resistance to openly gay girls and boys participating in team sports.The bottom line is that trans girls are girls and should participate in girls sports. They are not boys and they are not an "other" that should be excluded.
02-16-2022
Donna Mitchell []
I didnt think our state was this transphobic but it looks like its heading that way. This is the second anti trans sports bill in recent days. Its simple. Kids deserve to play sports. You are not protecting girls sports with these discriminative bills. I am a cis woman and am in no way threatened by trans girls and women participating in womens sports. I strongly oppose ssb 3146. Do not make Iowa a transphobic state!
02-16-2022
Diana Wright []
I am opposed to this mean spirited bill, which has no basis in science. As an endocrinologist, I worked with transgendered girls and boys and can tell you there is nothing supporting this bill other than prejudice. Trans girls are girls and should be able to compete as such. I am wondering how much more ignorance and bigotry will permeate the Iowa legislature. Besides the direct ramifications of this bill, support for it endangers trans youth by adverse affects on mental health and by tacitly permitting bullying and discrimination. I am disgusted that anyone would support this evil and vile bill.
02-16-2022
Harper Sherwood-Reid []
Dear Subcommittee Members, I am highly concerned about the implications of SSB 3146 for transgender and nonbinary youth in the state of Iowa. While I understand the vital importance of fairness and equity, and support the work of the Iowa legislature to ensure equal access for all people to their rights, this bill seems to explicitly target youth for whom the opportunity to participate in sports can be vital. Young people whose gender and sex and birth do not match should have the right to participate in team and individual sports, if perhaps in ways that account for the ways that their bodies are different from those of cisgender youth. To deny trans and nonbinary youth the opportunity to participate in athletics is to alienate them from their peers, prevent them from accessing healthy behaviors, and exclude them from activities that they love. As a crisis line worker, I am intimately familiar with the ways in which these kinds of alienation, lack of health, and isolation from meaningful behaviors and activities have material consequences for gender nonconforming youth, including by putting them at increased risk for suicide and self harm. I urge you to reconsider the terms of this bill to give all Iowa youth the lifegiving opportunity to participate in school athletics.
02-16-2022
Shawn Voshell []
There is absolutely no scientific reason why this bill should exist. Transgender girls do not necessarily have higher testosterone levels than cisgender girls; in fact, their testosterone levels are often lower because of puberty blockers. Also, there is no conclusive proof that higher testosterone levels give female athletes any sort of physical advantage, and we don't force cisgender girls with high testosterone levels to compete against boys. Other states have had transgender girls competing in high school sports without any difficulties. The arguments being used against allowing transgender girls to compete in girls' sports aren't that different from the arguments against allowing African American athletes to compete 80 years ago. Lastly, transgender teenagers are already at a higher risk of mental health issues, and the type of discrimination promoted by this bill would add to the problem.
02-16-2022
Katie Imborek []
I am a physician and Professor of Family Medicine at the University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics. I am the coDirector of the University of Iowa Health Care LGBTQ Clinic. I submit these comments on behalf of myself, as an Iowan and expert in the medical care of transgender persons. I am not commenting on behalf of UI Health Care. I am here to vehemently express my opposition to this discriminatory and harmful legislation. The UI Health Care LGBTQ Clinic has cared for nearly 10,000 Iowans since its inception in 2012, with over 70% of them identifying as transgender or gender nonbinary. Our team consists of family doctors, internists, pediatricians, pediatric endocrinologists, gynecologists, urologists, and mental health providers. We have cared for more than 1,000 transgender and nonbinary youth. We are the definitive experts in transgender medical care in the state of Iowa. After discussing with all members of our LGBTQ clinic team, we collectively can think of 3 transgender girls who are participating in high school sports. Let me repeat, 3 total trans girls who currently play sports at the high school level in the state of Iowa. This proposed bill purports to solve a problem that does not actually exist. There are not droves of transgender girls who are actively taking away the opportunity to play from their cisgender or nontransgender classmates. There is a however a clear problem that does exist, and that is disparate mental health outcomes for transgender youth. I saw several transgender teens in my clinic this week. Unfortunately, more than a few of them had recently been hospitalized for thoughts of suicide. I wish that I could say this week was an anomaly, but the reality is that transgender patients are at an exceedingly high risk for poor mental health outcomes. A 2020 survey of over 40,000 LGBTQ youth found rates of depression and anxiety more than 4 times that often reported for cisgender or nontransgender youth and an alarming 52% of trans and nonbinary youth who had considered attempting suicide in the 12 months prior. I want to clearly communicate that there is nothing inherent to being transgender or receiving medical care to affirm ones gender that increases an adolescents risk for mental illness. The American Academy of Pediatrics policy statement from 2018 makes this very clear when the authors concluded, There is no evidence that risk for mental illness is inherently attributable to ones identity of transgender. Rather, it is believed to be multifactorial, stemming from an internal conflict between ones appearance and identity, limited availability of mental health services, low access to health care providers with expertise in caring for youth who identify as transgender, discrimination, stigma, and social rejection. In summary, the mere proposal of bills such as this, bills that would codify discrimination against an already marginalized group of children, are the very reasons there are differences in rates of mental illness between transgender and cisgender youth. You know what could actually make a positive difference and improve the mental health of trans kids? The opportunity to play sports on a team that affirms their gender. I implore you to vote against this bill and instead use your power and your privilege to protect the children who are most at risk.
02-16-2022
Stacy Schmidt []
I strongly urge you NOT to pass this bill. I have been teaching in Iowa public schools for 18 years. In that time I have coached volleyball at the varsity and subvarsity levels, tennis at both the varsity and subvarsity levels, and officiated volleyball at the varsity and subvarsity levels including in conferences with some of the largest schools and most competitive programs in the state. I am currently teaching at Lincoln High School in Des Moines. One of the many buildinglevel goals at Lincoln High School this year is to have at least 40% of students involved in community partnerships or district sponsored activities, which includes schoolbased athletic programs. The reason for this goal is simple: Research shows that student involvement in extracurricular activities has positive impact on students overall academic success. Students who participate in extracurricular activities have greater levels of academic achievement, this includes classroom grades and standardized test scores. Second, extracurricular participation supports students character development by giving them leadership skills, time management skills, and the ability to accept constructive criticism. Third, extracurricular participation raises students selfesteem and resiliency. This aspect of participation is critical for trans athletes, when you consider the fact that LGBTQ+ young people are four times more likely to attempt suicide than their cisgendered peers. It is not a stretch to say that participation in a gender affirming athletic program could literally save lives. While the proposed bill would not exclude trans and nonbinary youth from all extracurricular activities, prohibiting trans youth from participating in the sport programs of their affirming gender identity sends a clear message. And that message is that trans kids are not deserving of equal opportunities for success compared to their cisgendered peers. All students should have the option to participate in the full range of extracurricular activities provided in Iowa schools, including participation in athletic programs aligned to affirming gender identities. A students identity as trans or nonbinary should not be the determining factor in whether or not they are able to participate in school athletics. There has yet to be a case brought before athletic associations and athletic unions showing that trans athletes have an unfair advantage when participating in gender affirming athletic programs. However, there is a wealth of research showing that participation in activities is directly connected to increased school attendance, character development, academic and social success, and peer relationships. It is clear that the known, evidence supported, positive impact of participation in activities outweighs the unsubstantiated perception of any advantage for trans athletes in specific programs.
02-16-2022
Lisa Riggin []
Trans girls are girls and should be allowed to participate in girls sports. I fully support their rights to be who they are, and not who someone who doesnt really care about them says they should be. We are all watching.
02-16-2022
Alex Campbell []
I am writing to your office to encourage you to OPPOSE SSB 3146. It is extremely disappointing to see Iowa legislators continue to push antitrans bills. These discriminatory practices are exclusionary and deeply harmful. SSB 3146 would put Iowa state law into conflict with Title IX, which protects gender identityincluding trans athletes. Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 protects people from discrimination based on sex in education programs or activities that receive federal financial assistance. The Iowa Attorney General would be required to defend public school districts taken to court over violating Title IX, an expense Iowa taxpayers would be burdened with. This outcome is avoidable if you vote NO on SSB 3146.The Iowa High School Girls' Athletic Union already has guidelines on trans athletes. Trans girls in Iowa have participated in girls' athletics for over 15 years without a single instance of "unfair advantage" being documented. Participation in school activitiesincluding athleticshas been proven to advance academic success, increase school attendance, and improve peer relationships. Trans girls have a right to the same opportunities as their cisgender peers. Please vote to OPPOSE SSB 3146!
02-16-2022
Linda Powers []
I am strongly opposed to this legislation
02-16-2022
Sandy Wilson [Citizen Engagement]
Citizen Engagement declares IN FAVOR of SSB 3146.
02-16-2022
Sandy Wilson []
I am in favor of SSB 3146. It is discrimination against women and girls to require them to compete against biological males for scholarships and other opportunities afforded to elite athletes. Move the bill forward.
02-16-2022
Michelle Veach []
Im in favor of SSB 3146. Please protect our biological girls from Competing against biological males. Female bodies are different from makes and always will be, regardless of hormone suppression etc. As a mom of a boy and girl, I can attest that my sons hands are bigger, muscle density is stronger and his lungs are bigger. Nothing he can do to his body will change that. Protect our girls keep the competition female to female.
02-16-2022
Samantha Fett []
I strongly support this bill as we need to protect female sports at all levels. This bill is not about discrimination but about protecting women and girls from their hard work and they deserve to play on a fair playing field. Remember we compete with our bodies not our selfproclaimed identities. All of the opportunities for girls were created because we recognized the physical differences between girls and boys, why would we go backwards? Please pass this legislation, school districts and sports organizations are looking for leadership on this issue.
02-16-2022
Jordyn Landau []
Female sports MUST be protected. Biological males have an advantage in sports when competing against females. Its in the DNA. I played water polo and swam for over 10 years. We used to race and scrimmage with the boys teams all the time and they would always beat us. Lia Thomas, a male swimmer who identifies as female swam for the University of Pennsylvania for three years on the mens team and was ranked almost 500 in the country. When they switched over to the girls team, they ranked number 1. This is completely unfair to female athletes who train all their lives. Please vote to protect female athletes!!
02-16-2022
Jenn Turner []
Save Girls sports! There are stories all across this country where girls are losing opportunities to biological males. This will happen here too.
02-16-2022
Jenna Marsh []
This has to STOP!!! Trans girls are girls! Trans boys are boys! Full stop!
02-16-2022
Emmanuel Parel []
I am writing a comment regarding the SSB 3416 bill. This bill is absolutely unfair for trans girls. They deserve to play the sports they enjoy, and shouldnt be discriminated against for doing so. Please do not go through with this bill.
02-16-2022
Heidi Zwick []
I strongly oppose SSB 3146. As a school social worker I am deeply concerned about a bill that legalizes discrimination of our transgender students. Sports are such an important part of life for some people and to ban this group from participating is inhumane and cruel. Transgender students are able to compete at the collegiate level and should be able to compete at the high school level as well. Our transgender students are at greater risk to die by suicide. Their ability to participate in sports could provide them a sense of belonging that would negate some of these feelings. There was a huge push last year to get kids back in school full time for mental health reasons. If you proceed with this legislation you will be directly negatively impacting our students and their mental health.
02-16-2022
Brian Carter [Iowa United Methodist Church Legislative Advocacy Team]
I am Brian Carter,lobbyist for the United Methodist Church. We are registered as against this bill. The reason is simple, God so loved the world, that God sent God's only Son, that whoever believes in should not parish but have everlasting life. God sent God' Son into the world not to condemn the world but that world through him would be saved." Every person is loved by God. There is no longer Greek and Jew, female and male, no longer slave and free, but you are all one in Christ Jesus."The Social Principles of the church declares; We deplore acts of hate or violence against groups or persons based on race, color, national origin, ethnicity, age, gender, disability, status, economic condition, sexual orientation, gender identity, or religious affiliation.I have friends and family members who are homosexual. They are part of God's family and deserve to be treated as equals and as persons of sacred worth. I also have a friend who is transgender. She was born as a male, and over the years she grew to understand that she was always a woman. I support her in her new lifewhich she has lived for nearly 20 years.Laws such as this bill are based on prejudice, fear, and falsehood. I urge you to support our trans brothers and sisters and don't make their lives more difficult.
02-16-2022
Jill Bjorklund []
I oppose SSB 3146 because it is an unnecessary and discriminatory bill. Many of us grew up believing sex was binary and only determined by physical characteristics (typically genitalia), but that is simply untrue. Scientists agree that biologically speaking, sex is determined by a variety of factors including chromosomes, hormones, genes, sex organs, and secondary sex characteristics. There are people born with XXY, XYY, X, XXX chromosomes. There are cisgender females, such as Olympic athlete Caster Semenya, with naturally high testosterone. There are intersex individuals who are born with bodies that may have physical characteristics typically seen in males AND females. So my first point is how are we determining sex? Are we asking all students to prove it? Secondly, for those who claim trans girls have a biological advantage, are we creating separate teams for height? Weight or muscle mass? Coordination? I can't help but think of this every time I see the junior high basketball team playing in the gym down my hall. What about PUBERTY! (Talk about a variety of biological advantages and disadvantages!)Thirdly, biology is not the end all to determining one's identity and where they belong on a sports team. As the mother of a transgender daughter, I have had my eyes and heart opened so much wider the past few years. She was not groomed into this. She did not watch a TikTok video. She is not being peer pressured by a group going through a "fad." She is certainly not mentally ill. She poses no threat in a classroom, a bathroom, or on a sports team. She dances in a girls' ballet class, her peer group is almost entirely female, and appears female to all who see her. She IS a girl. Trans girls ARE girls, and trans boys ARE boys. They deserve to have their identity and very existence recognized and protected as it currently is under law. Are you going to tell her she can't play volleyball with her friends? Are you going to tell the trans athletes around Iowa they will be kicked off of their teams?Lastly, none of this is about sports, biology, or protecting cisgender women. This "solution" is solving a problem that doesn't exist. There has been no public outcry from athletic associations, coaches, or schools due to trans athletes dominating a sport because it hasn't happened. This bill (along with all the other proposed antitrans legislation and rhetoric) is extremely dangerous to one of our most vulnerable populations, even those trans kids who don't want to play sports. If you pass this bill, you will be potentially outing the status of current trans athletes, telling every trans kid that their identity is not real, that the records/egos of elite cisgender female athletes are more important than their right to participate, and that they are unwelcome in sports. It doesn't take much imagination to guess how trans kids will take that being a population at an elevated risk of depression, isolation, bullying, selfharm, and suicide. This population needs protection not discrimination support and acceptance, not hate and exclusion.
02-17-2022
Erika Hendel []
I spent 5 years in Iowa and am devastated to seen the legislations that are being put forward to discriminate and target trans girls and trans youth. This is a vulnerable population of kids that experience high rates of bullying, harassment, and violence. The continued othering of them through law has sobering impacts on youth who are already at higher risk of suicidal ideation. Please look at these girls as they are children who deserve protection as well. Not others to be viewed as lesser than.
02-17-2022
Brenda Smith []
This bill must be passed! The stats show that even the slowest males will out compete the fastest females. This is a attack on women and womens rights and the other side knows it. Please pass SSB 3146 to save girls and womens sports.
02-17-2022
Dani Ausen []
This is a solution looking for a problem. The reasons I have heard cited for this bill are to "protect girls' sports" as if we currently have a problem with male identified children playing sports. We don't have that problem. Only girls are participating in girls' sports (because trans girls are girls), and this has been legal and there have been no problems. I know this because if their had been problems, we would be hearing about them.Instead, we hear hurtful talking points that are not true."Boys will take away scholarships and championships from girls." This is not happening. It's not true. Why? Because most trans athletes are just typical children. They are mostly average athletes, because most kids are average athletes."Girls will be unsafe in lockers rooms."This much loved and disgusting talking point is once again just simply not true. If it was, people would be splashing around cases of women being assaulted by trans women in bathrooms. They aren't telling these stories because they aren't true.What is actually happening? Bullying. Even just putting this bill on the docket is bullying. I have watched my trans friends, who are adults, struggling through the news coverage. It's othering and demoralizing. This is a culture war issue, and it's only going to serve to hurt the most vulnerable: trans kids, who already have astronomical rates of depression and suicide. Who already get bullied by their peers. Who just want to do something normal, like play softball after school.So why don't you scrap this harmful and unnecessary legislation and fix something that actually IS a problem? Like raising the minimum wage? Or making sure Iowans can afford food and housing?
02-17-2022
Carrie Wright []
I support SSB 3146. If biological males are allowed to compete in girls and women's sports, it's no longer a fair playing field.
02-17-2022
Johna Clancy []
I am support of this bill. A persons biological makeup does not change. They are still biologically a girl or biologically a boy. So a boy identifying as a girl and competing in girls sports would always have a competitive advantage over biological girls.
02-17-2022
Janice Weiner []
This is a cruel solution in search of a problem that takes aim at a particularly vulnerable group of teens and showcases fear, lack of understanding and willful ignorance of science. It would instead create problems (law suits), discriminate in violation of Federal law and cost taxpayers big time in many ways. If this body claims to prioritize mental health, this would run completely counter to those efforts to help young people. Strongly oppose.
02-17-2022
Judah Richardson []
I oppose SSB 3146. Iowa needs the best players on the field for recruiting, sports prowess, and gameplay quality, regardless of their identity. SSB 3146 would damage the competitiveness of the state's sports.
02-17-2022
Todd Brady []
I am writing to voice my strong opposition to SSB3146. Trans girls are girls. There is a long history of excluding groups from sports, and there is no place for it in Iowa. These kids are finding their identity, and sports may be an outlet for them. Its a place for teamwork, camaraderie, and a sense of belonging that may help with mental health. By passing this bill, you are taking a stand and saying trans kids identities are not accepted in Iowa.
02-17-2022
Paul Deaton [Self]
I oppose SSB 3146. To discriminate against a protected class of school children is unfair and unnecessary. The idea transgender females are who they are because they want to participate in Title IX school activities is ludicrous. There is no reason to foster a bullying environment for children in schools as this legislation inevitably would. Transgender children are children. The legislature should leave children alone.
02-17-2022
Amy Dea []
I am in support of SSB 3146. I support protecting our girls sports. I am asking you to vote in favor of protecting our girls from being forced to compete against biological males. Give them a fair opportunity in their sport. These ladies are asking us to protect them. I trust that you will.
02-17-2022
Terry Pearce []
I support this bill .I am astonished that society has diminished to the point that legislation is needed to ensure that Girl's sports is for girls and boy's sports are for boys . The "other" community is always crying that they are offended when people including teachers coaches do not address them by the correct pronoun that they claim to identify as, and yet they also demand that they be accepted and allowed to participate in a sport that does not acknowledge their claimed identity. I believe that every human has an equal right to free speech and all other constitutional rights . They are free to claim and identify as anything they want but they do not have the right to change the law of nature that girls are girls and boys are boys . They should be free to form sport competitions for specifically for Others but do not have the right for Girls to compete against Girls.
02-17-2022
Auden Perino [National Women's Law Center]
Testimony of Elizabeth Tang & Auden Perino, Senior Counsels for Education & Workplace Justice, on behalf of the National Women's Law Center.
Attachment
02-17-2022
Patsy Martinson []
Myth: Trans girls shouldn't participate in girls' and women's athletics because it will ruin those sports for others.There is a long history of excluding people from sports because they're different and because they would "spoil" sports: 70 years ago Black people were excluded from sports for that same reason. 50 years ago women were excluded from sports programs. More recently, there has been resistance to openly gay girls and boys participating in team sports.The bottom line is that trans girls are girls and should participate in girls sports. They are not boys and they are not an "other" that should be excluded.
02-17-2022
Jen Sinkler []
Hello. I am the first woman from Iowa to play international rugby at the senior level. It is not an exaggeration to say that finding the sport saved me on numerous levels. During the 12+ years in the game, I played both with and against trans women. A 20year policy has been in place with NO ISSUES. In a contact sport. (Though in fact, cis men used to punch cis women if they played mens rugby.)When I became involved with Rugby For All, a group that gathered in the face of being targeted by the SAME RELIGIOUS HATE GROUPS that these proposed bills come by.The goal of these groups is complete erasure of trans people. Period. Sports are an entry point for them. And we must not fall for it.Having even ONE adult who supports a trans child MARKEDLY DECREASES rate of suicide. As a queer person, I can say I needed more uplifting support here in Iowa., growing up. I would love to see us all flourish. Please dont pass this bill. Thank you.
02-17-2022
Beth Speltz []
Please oppose this discriminatory bill which would be so harmful to some of our most vulnerable youth. Trans kids are still kids.
02-17-2022
Gary Smith []
I strongly support this bill. Iowa girls sports are for girls period! Not mentally ill boys who want to be girls. The next bill introduced should be a fund to get these mentally ill kids the help they need and also help to the parents supporting this nonsense!
02-17-2022
Carol Swanson []
Senators.SSB 3146, restricting transgender girls from high school sports is discriminatory. What do you fear? Do you know that some transgender people change their body so it aligns with their identity (taking hormones and having surgery) these girls are just as female as I am.You seem to be spending a lot of time telling schools/students/parents and guardians, what to do! If you have concerns about transgender youth who are not changing their bodies, talk to the coaches and athletic directors in your school districts to find out their experiences and ideas. Then talk with experts in the emotional and intellectual wellbeing of transgender students. Then you'll know more than you know now. This bill is another example of overreach by Republican legislators trying to control us by legislating your moral or ethical standards instead of guarding rights of the public at large and adequately funding public education. Overreach, restriction, discrimination . . . Iowa Republicans. Sincerely, Carol Swanson
02-17-2022
Otto Hall [healthcare - retired]
When I was a kid (early 1950s) Iowa license plates proudly sported our claim: "THE CORN STATE"!Today, they should proclaim "THE BOYS AND GIRLS WRESTELING STATE"! Just kidding.Good that girls (women) can wrestle competitively in school. As a grandfather, however, I'd rather my granddaughter not grapple with a transgirl who was on the boy's / men's wrestling team last year. Talk about bringing in a ringer! Upon further reflection, I believe that even though that sort of situation would creep anyone out, some reasonable accommodation could be made that would be fair to females who play sports. Girls play on coed hocky teams. There is an NFL female kicker. My daughterinlaw is on the staff of the Mayo Clinic. Her subspeciality is working with adolescentstroubled with their gender identity. I don't understand it. Nobody does currently. It' complicated, a mixture of neurotransmitters, genes, environment. It's real, and has been around since before we even could make fire. Kids with these conditions do not choose it for themselves. They, through no fault of their own, have a complex enough life, without being told they can't play sports.Dr. Otto W. Hall1801 4th AvenueGrinnell, IA 50112(641)2368296ottohallmchsi.com