| Previous Day: Tuesday, January 12 | Next Day: Thursday, January 14 |
| Senate Journal: Index | House Journal: Index |
| Legislation: Index | Bill History: Index |
| Previous Page: 62 | Today's Journal Page |
surrounding surrounding counties, "We have attempted to deal with the increase by improving efficiency in scheduling and reducing hearing time allotted to each case and doing more reviews on paper. . . . I am always concerned that by spending less time on individual cases, we are shortchanging the kids and families." Judge Flaherty's concern is well taken. Imagine how the families must feel, when, because of inadequate resources, their day in court is reduced to minutes. We simply must provide a climate in which justice is not rationed by use of a stopwatch. Although present difficulties in the criminal and juvenile dockets take priority, we certainly cannot ignore civil cases. Nearly one-half of the trial courts' civil docket is composed of domestic relations cases, which include dissolution of marriage, contempt, modification of dissolution, and uniform child support cases. These are important cases. But because criminal and juvenile cases must be given highest priority, domestic relations cases must wait in line. Other segments of the civil docket such as property disputes, personal injury suits, and business litigation, must wait longer. To keep criminal and juvenile cases moving in Polk County, two district court judges are being moved from the general trial assignment. One judge is being assigned to juvenile cases and the other is being assigned to criminal cases. This shift will have a ripple effect on the civil docket. Previously, parties in dissolution of marriage cases had to wait about nine months for a trial. Now, they will have to wait even longer. We have no control over the number of cases presented. Nor should we. To limit the number of cases would be to limit the ability of Iowans to have meaningful access to justice. Some might suggest we can temporarily relieve the pressure in the criminal and juvenile dockets by shifting judges here and there. But this is simply reorganizing the deck chairs. It is not even an effective temporary solution, much less a long term solution. Efficiency measures and aggressive case management have been implemented, but can only do so much, because even the most productive judges can carefully decide only a certain number of cases each day. There is no escape from simple arithmetic: As long as the demand for justice grows, we will need more judges. The details of our specific recommendations are contained in our budget request which we have submitted to you. Alexis de Toqueville observed more than 160 years ago that in America, all public issues are eventually resolved in the courts. That observation is as true today as it was in the early 19th Century. And surely one of the most challenging issues permeating our courts in the late 20th Century is drug abuse. Many of the cases pouring into the court system today involve drug abuse in one way or another. Its impact is not confined to prosecutions for possession or distribution of illicit drugs. Our judges see drug abuse as a major contributing cause in many child in need of assistance cases, juvenile delinquency cases, dissolution of marriage cases, termination of parental rights cases and domestic violence cases. The implications are profound. The following information was provided to me by judges from around the state who have witnessed the destruction caused by drug abuse. Drug addiction is not isolated to one area of the state, one race or one age group. Our judges see addicts, who are, or were, professional people, homeless people, single
| Next Page: 64 | |
| Previous Day: Tuesday, January 12 | Next Day: Thursday, January 14 |
| Senate Journal: Index | House Journal: Index |
| Legislation: Index | Bill History: Index |
© 1999 Cornell College and League of Women Voters of Iowa
Comments about this site or page?
sjourn@legis.iowa.gov.
Please remember that the person listed above does not vote on bills. Direct all comments concerning legislation to State Legislators.
Last update: Fri Jan 29 13:40:38 CST 1999
URL: /DOCS/GA/78GA/Session.1/SJournal/00000/00063.html
jhf