Iowa General Assembly Banner


Previous Day: Tuesday, January 9Next Day: Thursday, January 11
Senate Journal: Index House Journal: Index
Legislation: Index Bill History: Index

Senate Journal: Wednesday, January 10, 1996

                               THIRD CALENDAR DAY

                                THIRD SESSION DAY

                                 Senate Chamber

                  Des Moines, Iowa, Wednesday, January 10, 1996



         The Senate met in regular session at 9:19 a.m., President Boswell
    presiding.

         Prayer was offered by the Reverend Ronald Bouwkamp, pastor of the
    Peoria Christian Reformed Church, Pella, Iowa.

         The Journal of Tuesday, January 9, 1996, was approved.



                            COMMITTEE FROM THE HOUSE

         A committee from the House appeared and announced that the House
    was ready to receive the Senate in joint convention.

         In accordance with House Concurrent Resolution 102, duly adopted,
    the Senate proceeded to the House under the direction of the Secretary
    of the Senate and the Sergeant-at-arms.



                                JOINT CONVENTION

         In accordance with law and House Concurrent Resolution 102, duly
    adopted, the joint convention was called to order at 9:30 a.m.,
    President Boswell presiding.

         Senator Horn moved that the roll call be dispensed with and that
    the President of the joint convention be authorized to declare a quorum
    present, which motion prevailed by a voice vote.

         President Boswell declared a quorum present and the joint
    convention duly organized.

         Senator Horn moved that a committee of six, three members from the
    Senate and three members from the House, be appointed to escort
    Lieutenant Governor Joy Corning to the Condition of the Iowa Judiciary
    Message.
         The motion prevailed by a voice vote and the Chair announced the
    appointment of Senators Dvorsky, Dearden and McKean on the part of the
    Senate, and Representatives Bradley, Grundberg and Nelson of
    Pottawattamie on the part of the House.

         Senator Horn moved that a committee of six, three members from the
    Senate and three members from the House, be appointed to notify the
    Honorable Arthur A. McGiverin, Chief Justice of the Iowa Supreme Court,
    that the joint convention was ready to receive him.

         The motion prevailed by a voice vote and the Chair appointed as
    such committee Senators Giannetto, Gettings and Redfern on the part of
    the Senate, and Representatives Dinkla, Millage and Moreland on the part
    of the House.

         The following guests were escorted into the House Chamber:

         Secretary of State, Paul Pate; Secretary of Agriculture, Dale
    Cochran; State Auditor, Richard Johnson; and Attorney General, Tom
    Miller.

         Mrs. Joan McGiverin, wife of the Chief Justice; and Ed and Joan
    McGiverin, Chief Justice McGiverins cousin and his wife, were escorted
    into the House Chamber.

         The Justices of the Supreme Court, the Judges of the Court of
    Appeals, and the Chief Judges of the States judicial districts were
    escorted into the House chamber.

         The committee appointed waited upon Lieutenant Governor Joy Corning
    and escorted her to the speakers station.

         The committee appointed waited upon Chief Justice McGiverin and
    escorted him to the speakers station.

         President Boswell then presented Chief Justice McGiverin who
    delivered the following Condition of the Iowa Judiciary Message:

         Mr. President, Mr. Speaker, Governor, membaers of the General
    Assembly, state officials, judicial colleagues, and friends:

         Thank you for the kind invitation to appear before you today.
         Its a privilege to visit with you each year about the condition of
    Iowas courts. This address is an opportunity for me to review with you
    the significant activities of our courts, to evaluate whether were
    meeting our citizens needs for justice, and to recommend improvements as
    necessary. I hope this review helps you with some of the tough decisions
    youll face in the months to come.

         Providing Iowans with a fair, effective and efficient court system
    is a mission we share with you. Our roles may be different, but our
    goals are not. The strength of Iowas justice system depends, in large
    part, on the strength of our partnership. And we, in the judiciary,
    recognize the importance of communication in maintaining a good
    partnership.

         We understand the cost of poor communication, as did former FBI
    director, J. Edgar Hoover. He learned that even the simplest message,
    when not clearly communicated, can have a major impact. Years ago in an
    effort to cut costs, the FBI reduced the size of memo paper. One of the
    new memo sheets ended up on J. Edgar Hoovers desk. He disliked it
    immediately and wrote on the narrow margin, watch the borders.

         His message was misinterpreted. For the next six weeks, it was
    extremely difficult to enter the United States by road from either
    Mexico or Canada!

         Ill try to be clear.

         Although the news this year is not uniformly good, I hope you will
    conclude, as I have, that much of it is encouraging.

         First, Id like to focus on some of our achievements. It is always a
    pleasure to report on progress.

         Were certainly encouraged by progress in the collection of fines
    and fees, a matter in which we all are vitally interested. Id like to
    tell you in some detail what were doing.

         Everyone if offended when some scofflaws are allowed to accumulate
    substantial unpaid fines.

         Respect for court orders is on the line. Inconsistent enforcement
    of court orders calls into question the authority and effectiveness of
    the courts. A fine is a sentence. Its enforcement should be pursued
    diligently--as diligently as an enforcement of a jail sentence. The
    greatest impact on fine enforcement is made at the front-end of the
    process--the time when a sentence is imposed.

         We have set in motion a host of changes to improve the fine
    collection record of the courts. Many magistrates and judges are taking
    a tougher attitude. For example, in Linn County, Magistrate Pamela Lewis
    tells defendants appearing before her that they are expected to pay
    their fine that day. And she goes one step further. With the aid of a
    computer linked to the clerk of court office, she checks to see if they
    have unpaid fines from previous sentences. If they do, they are told to
    pay those, also.
         Across the state, all of our judicial districts have stepped up
    their fine and collection programs. Many judges are following the
    methods successfully used by the district associate judges in Scott
    County. In that program, the payment of fines, fees and restitution is
    made a condition of unsupervised probation in serious and aggravated
    misdemeanor cases. At sentencing, defendants are told that they must
    appear before the court on a date set in the future. The purpose of the
    court date is to determine if the conditions of probation have been met.
    Willful failure to comply with the terms of the unsupervised probation
    can result in a finding of contempt of court and jail time.

         A special team effort is in place in Sac County. Magistrates Warren
    Bush and Joseph Heidenreich and the clerk of court, Mary Jo Herrig, and
    her staff are working together to collect unpaid fines. Defendants are
    sent a notice reminding them of their unpaid fines and fees. They are
    also informed that if the amount is not paid by a certain date they must
    appear for a contempt of court hearing. Due to this extra effort, the
    Sac County court has collected over $22,000 in three months.

         Weve also achieved remarkable success with the aid of our computer
    system in the counties that have it.

         Weve collected over one million dollars from income tax refund
    offsets since 1994. Our computer system helped make this possible. It
    allows us to electronically send to the Department of Revenue and
    Finance lists of people who have unpaid fines. As we expand our computer
    system into more counties, the scope of this program will increase.

         This year we start using the central collection unit of the
    Department of Revenue and Finance to collect unpaid fines. Our computer
    system is crucial to this operation. When fines are not paid for sixty
    days, well send the information to the central collection unit by
    computer. The central collection unit will then work on the case. Theyll
    make phone calls, send notices, and take any further action necessary to
    enforce payment.

         In fiscal year 1995, our courts collected over $54 million.
    Currently our receipts are up 6% over last year. At this rate, there
    will be some enhanced court collection funds available to use for
    expanding our computer system. Expanding our computer system is one of
    our budget recommendations for you. However, we plan to apply most of
    the enhanced court collection funds to offset our budget request for the
    computer system. Well work with you on the details.

         Were proud of the extra efforts our judges and staff are making to
    enforce fines. However, its not our intent to force people to pay fines
    in cases of poverty. But we have no intention of taking second place in
    a line of consumer choices.  There is a difference between poverty and
    simply preferring to pay for cable T.V. Those who are convicted of
    committing crimes must expect to make some sacrifices as a consequence.
    This is what fines are all about.
         We have other examples of our commitment to effective fine
    enforcement. However, now its time for a dose of reality so the visions
    of dollar signs dont cloud our collective good judgment. The types of
    procedures I mentioned earlier add to the already heavy workload of our
    courts. They take time away from other priorities. Furthermore, it would
    not be cost effective to spend our valuable resources on cases in which
    the cost of collecting a fine far exceeds the fine itself. And finally,
    there are some people who, no matter what steps are taken, just cannot
    be made to pay off their debt. Im talking about transients; people who,
    for whatever reasons, dont have any money; and people serving time in
    prison. For all these reasons, we must not view the annual tally of
    unpaid fines and fees as an unlimited vein of revenue just waiting to be
    mined.

         There is another area in which weve also made positive strides. Im
    pleased to report our progress in responding to the recommendations of
    our Domestic Abuse Task Force. Under the leadership of many judges, and
    with the help of Jennifer Juhler, our domestic abuse intervention
    coordinator, local community domestic abuse coalitions have been created
    around the state. The purpose of the coalitions is to promote a
    community response to the problem of domestic abuse. We have also
    sponsored domestic abuse round table discussions in all of our judicial
    districts. Weve been working closely with the Department of Public
    Safety to create a statewide domestic abuse registry. The registry will
    provide law enforcement officers around the state with the most current
    information on protective orders.

         Were making other substantial advances with the help of technology.

         Our court computer system, the Iowa Court Information System or
    ICIS, is making us more efficient and effective. It also serves the
    needs of and assists other government departments. For example:

         Were sending criminal disposition data to the Department of Public
    Safety and the Department of Corrections through our network.

         In a few months, well be linked by computer with the Department of
    Transportation so it can get traffic and criminal case information from
    the courts electronically.

         And weve developed a new program to assist county treasurers to
    stop the renewal of vehicle registration of persons who have unpaid
    fines.

         Technology also can help relieve the record storage problems of
    county courthouses. Most of Iowas courthouses are bursting at the seams
    with old records. Records are stacked from floor to ceiling, piled in
    attics and basements, and crammed in garages and storage buildings.
    Counties are simply running out of space. Records stored in poor
    conditions are deteriorating quickly. Imaging technology may be one
    solution to this problem. We decided to find out.

         Last March, the Sac County clerks office, with the help of many
    volunteers, started purging court files. Purging means removing from a
    file, and destroying, records which have no legal value. Once this was
    finished, the files were ready to be reproduced. A document imaging
    company was hired to reproduce the records. Each document was placed,
    one at a time, through a scanner. An exact reproduction was
    automatically stored on a compact disc. The discs look like those sold
    in music stores. The results of this six-month project are astonishing!
    Fifty years of court records that filled 65 file drawers are now stored
    on 11 four-inch C.D.s.

         Technology can also help us manage the flood of criminal cases.
    Often in some of our high-volume courts, the system is so clogged that
    judges have little choice but to make decisions about criminal
    defendants based upon incomplete information. Polk County district
    associate court is developing an automated case management system to
    solve this problem. This system will serve as a prototype for courts
    around the state. This system will link, by computer, judges, the county
    attorneys office, the jail, the public defenders office, the department
    of correctional services, and the clerks office. Once this is ready,
    everyone on the network will have instant access to information about
    criminal defendants. Thats the way it ought to be.

         I wholeheartedly support further use of technology! My technology
    of comfort is a sharp, number two, Ticonderoga pencil. Its
    user-friendly, low maintenance, and its not smarter than I am. But times
    are changing and we all must change with it.

         Im delighted to note that a majority of Iowans favor the use of
    technology in the courts. In response to a new survey conducted for our
    Commission on Planning for the 21st Century, a majority polled thought
    that increasing the use of computer and communications technology in
    court operations is a good idea.

         Today, weve set up a court technology exhibit in the hall outside
    our courtroom downstairs to showcase some of our innovative programs.
    Please come down after these remarks, join us for coffee, and look
    through our display.

         Were making significant progress in the area of planning for the
    future. As that wise baseball sage, Yogi Berra, pointed out, The future
    isnt what is used to be.

         We are eagerly awaiting the report of our Planning Commission,
    which is chaired by Justice Linda Neuman. Never before have the Iowa
    courts conducted a comprehensive, long-range planning effort of this
    magnitude. Since last May, 60 hardworking Iowans from all walks of life
    have devoted substantial time to this project. They have been closely
    examining our court system and studying changes which will help us meet
    the needs of Iowans in the 21st Century. Thank you in advance for the
    financial support your leadership has pledged for this study.

         The Planning Commission is scheduled to complete its work and
    report to the Supreme Court by June. A year from now, we hope to provide
    you with a full complement of legislative proposals which will help
    prepare our courts for the future.  I am confident that together we can
    shape a justice system that will continue, even in the face of
    tremendous changes in society, to administer the highest levels of
    justice.
         Now, Id like to journey back a bit.

         Last year in my State of the Judiciary message, I reported that the
    courts were struggling under the weight of a crushing caseload. Case
    filings in all categories were at record levels. I talked with you about
    our most troubling cases, juvenile, domestic abuse and criminal, which
    were consuming most of our court resources. We faced the strong
    possibility that all of our resources would eventually be used for
    criminal matters at the expense of civil cases. More resources,
    particularly more judges, were needed to help us confront this crisis.

         Thank you, for your generous response. The additional resources you
    provided, although not our full request, have somewhat eased the
    pressure.

         It would be easy for us to respond to this help by leaning back,
    and breathing a sigh of relief. But that would be a mistake because the
    problems I described last year are still very much with us.

         Keeping up with the rising tide of cases remains our biggest
    challenge. More than one-half million cases, not including simple
    traffic violations, were filed last year in this state. Thats more than
    one case every minute. In other words, during the time that Im visiting
    with you this morning, thirty new cases will be filed.

         Criminal, domestic abuse and juvenile cases continue to crowd our
    dockets and consume our time the most.

         Please listen to the growth last year in the number of these cases:
         Indictable criminal cases, the most serious crimes, jumped 10%.
         Simple misdemeanor cases, a category in which we always see
    high-volume, increased 13%.
         Juvenile cases grew 6%.
         And, domestic abuse cases continue to pour in at a frenzied rate;
    they shot up 31%.

         Theres no end in sight to these alarming trends. Because of time
    constraints, I wont go into more detail about the caseload now. But I
    ask that you carefully review the information that is attached to these
    remarks.

         You must bear in mind that new laws and mandates inevitably
    increase the pressure. Tougher criminal penalties add to the demands on
    our courts. New civil remedies add to the demands on our courts. Shorter
    time frames for hearings add to the demands on our courts. Each one adds
    to the demands placed on the courts, which in turn adds to the need for
    more resources. Its like trying to manufacture a newly designed car
    without retooling the factory.

         How does all of this look to the hundreds of Iowans coming to court
    each day?

         Sensational trials, such as that of O.J. Simpson, grab front-page
    headlines and public attention. But while they serve in some ways to
    educate the public about court procedures, they bear little resemblance
    to typical cases that represent the courts routine business.
         Last year, I provided you with some descriptions of the hectic pace
    in our urban courthouses. Rural courts are also overwhelmed. However,
    theres a major difference between court service in a rural courthouse
    and an urban courthouse.  Rural courts do not have the luxury of having
    a judge available each day.

         In Dallas County, just to the west, court service day resembles a
    cattle call with people nervously waiting for hours to have their case
    heard. Criminal matters get top priority. They are heard first. Civil
    cases are heard later in the day only if all criminal matters are
    completed. Its not unusual for court service to continue into the night
    with some matters left unresolved.

         Many cases get bumped until later dates. Recently, I learned of a
    dissolution case pending in Dallas County involving the custody of two
    children. The day before trial, the case was continued because all of
    the judges were busy, presiding over other cases. The family came back
    six weeks later. Again, the day before trial, the case had to be
    continued because the judges were too busy on other matters. Imagine the
    strain on the parents and the children. The case is scheduled again to
    be heard this month. I certainly hope that it can be.

         What can we do to reduce some of this enormous burden and still
    provide the public with an appropriate method for resolving disputes?

         Alternative dispute resolution, such as mediation, is one way to
    reduce our civil caseload. According to the survey which I mentioned
    earlier, this is favored by most Iowans.

         This past year weve been working with our judicial districts and
    private providers to furnish mediation services around the state. Many
    of our busiest courts now offer small claims mediation. Mediation of
    personal injury cases appears to be growing rapidly.

         Mediation of family law cases is not catching on as much as wed
    like to. We dont know why. Educating people on the value of mediation in
    these cases should help. Weve sponsored, with the help of other groups,
    many training programs on the use of mediation in family law cases. We
    hope this training promotes mediation and encourages people to try it.

         Two new family law mediation projects are underway thanks to grants
    from the courts technology fund, which you provided to us two years ago.
    The Johnson County Bar Association and the Sixth Judicial District have
    teamed up to start a court-annexed family mediation program. The Second
    Judicial District and the Center for Creative Justice in Ames are
    working together on a child custody and visitation mediation project to
    divert modification of custody claims from the courts.

         Whether mediation will make a noticeable difference in our caseload
    remains to be seen. However, any progress we make on the civil side is
    overshadowed by the relentless growth in criminal, domestic abuse and
    juvenile cases.
         Breaking the back of crime, protecting victims of domestic abuse,
    and turning around the lives of troubled children are high on your
    agenda. We share your concerns and our courts wrestle with these issues
    daily. But right now, these cases have us in a choke-hold with little
    time left for other important cases.

         I want to commend our judges and staff. Theyre working their
    hardest, with the aid of technology and innovative programs, to handle
    the constant barrage of cases. However, we need your continued support.

         As long as the unprecedented demand for court services continues,
    well need more judges, more staff and more support. Our specific budget
    needs and recommendations are contained in our budget request which we
    have submitted to you.

         In addition, adequate compensation to attract and retain good
    judges shores up the strength of our operation. Our judges were
    heartened last year by your attempt to meaningfully respond to the
    recommendations of the judicial compensation commission. We hope that
    issue will be re-examined by you this year.

         You deserve and have our warmest thanks for responding to our
    concerns in the past. We must continue to work together to meet the
    publics need for a fair and effective court system.

         Chief Justice McGiverin was escorted from the House chamber by the
    committee previously appointed.

         Lieutenant Governor Corning was escorted from the House chamber by
    the committee previously appointed.

         Representative Siegrist moved that the joint convention be
    dissolved, which motion prevailed by a voice vote.

         The Senate returned to the Senate chamber and resumed regular
    session, President pro tempore Bisignano presiding.



                                     RECESS

         On motion of Senator Judge, the Senate recessed at 10:22 a.m.,
    until 3:00 p.m.
                                    APPENDIX



                            SUBCOMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS

                          Senate Joint Resolution 2001

    STATE GOVERNMENT: Gronstal, Chair; Drake and Sorensen

                                 Senate File 52

                                 (Reassignment)

    AGRICULTURE: Priebe, Chair; Banks and Fraise

                                 Senate File 58

    AGRICULTURE: Priebe, Chair; Banks and Fraise

                                 Senate File 67

    COMMERCE: Hansen, Chair; Deluhery and Lundby

                                 Senate File 92

    WAYS AND MEANS: Murphy, Chair; McLaren and Szymoniak

                                 Senate File 334

    AGRICULTURE: Priebe, Chair; Banks and Fraise

                                 Senate File 401

    COMMERCE: Deluhery, Chair; Douglas and Hansen

                                 Senate File 421

    COMMERCE: Palmer, Chair; Husak and Redfern

                                 Senate File 464

    WAYS AND MEANS: Vilsack, Chair; Deluhery and Freeman

                                 Senate File 465

    WAYS AND MEANS: Vilsack, Chair; Deluhery and Drake

                                 Senate File 485

    WAYS AND MEANS: Murphy, Chair; Connolly and Drake
                                Senate File 2003

    STATE GOVERNMENT: Bisignano, Chair; Fink and Lind

                                Senate File 2004

    JUDICIARY: Szymoniak, Chair; Bartz, Giannetto, Maddox and Vilsack

                                Senate File 2006

    JUDICIARY: Hammond, Chair; Giannetto, McKean, Redfern and Vilsack

                                Senate File 2007

    JUDICIARY: Giannetto, Chair; Hammond, McKean, Redfern and Vilsack

                                Senate File 2009

    JUDICIARY: Fraise, Chair; Giannetto, McKean, Redfern and Vilsack

                                Senate File 2010

    JUDICIARY: Szymoniak, Chair; Drake, Giannetto, Hammond and Maddox

                                Senate File 2011

    NAT. RESOURCES, ENVIR. & ENERGY: Kibbie, Chair; Hedge and Judge

                                Senate File 2012

    STATE GOVERNMENT: Bisignano, Chair; Fink and Lind

                                Senate File 2013

    STATE GOVERNMENT: Connolly, Chair; Halvorson and Lundby

                                Senate File 2014

    STATE GOVERNMENT: Kibbie, Chair; Gronstal, Halvorson, Lundby and Rittmer

                                Senate File 2015

    STATE GOVERNMENT: Gronstal, Chair; Drake and Sorensen

                                Senate File 2018

    COMMERCE: Hansen, Chair; Deluhery and Douglas
                                 Senae File 2020

    STATE GOVERNMENT: Connolly, Chair; Bisignano and McLaren

                                Senate File 2021

    NAT. RESOURCES, ENVIR. & ENERGY: Gronstal, Chair; Black and Lundby

                                Senate File 2025

    JUDICIARY: Bisignano, Chair; Boettger, Giannetto, Redfern and Vilsack

                                Senate File 2026

    JUDICIARY: Hammond, Chair; Bartz, Halvorson, Maddox and Szymoniak

                                 House File 511

    COMMERCE: Gronstal, Chair; Deluhery and Redfern



                                COMMITTEE REPORT

    AGRICULTURE

    Final Bill Action: *SENATE FILE 2034 (LSB 3618), a bill for an act
    relating to county zoning of animal feeding operations.

    Recommendation: APPROVED COMMITTEE BILL.

    Final Vote: Ayes, 8: Priebe, Judge, Black, Boswell, Fraise, Giannetto,
    Palmer and Sorensen. Nays, 6: Bartz, Banks, Douglas, Hedge, McLaren and
    Zieman. Absent or not voting, 1: Husak.

    Fiscal Note: NOT REQUIRED UNDER JOINT RULE 17.

         *Pursuant to Senate Rule 40, the Legislative Service Bureau
    reported nonsubstantive changes to the members of the Agriculture
    Committee on Senate File 2034 and they were attached to the committee
    report.



                          REPORTS OF COMMITTEE MEETINGS

    COMMERCE

    Convened: January 9, 1996, 4:16 p.m.

    Members Present: Deluhery, Chair; Hansen, Vice Chair; Jensen, Ranking
    Member; Douglas, Flynn, Freeman, Gettings, Gronstal, Hedge, Husak,
    Lundby, Palmer and Redfern.
    Members Absent: Bisignano (excused) and Priebe.

    Committee Business: Assigned bills to subcommittees; overview of the
    insurance department by the commissioner of insurance.

    Adjourned: 4:50 p.m.



    TRANSPORTATION

    Convened: January 9, 1996, 3:20 p.m.

    Members Present: Gettings, Chair; Fraise, Vice Chair; Drake, Ranking
    Member; Black, Dearden, Douglas, Fink, Jensen, Lind and Rittmer.

    Members Absent: Connolly and Halvorson (both excused).

    Committee Business: Assigned bills to subcommittees.

    Adjourned: 3:27 p.m.



    WAYS AND MEANS

    Convened: January 9, 1996, 3:35 p.m.

    Members Present: Palmer, Chair; Husak, Vice Chair; Bennett, Ranking
    Member; Deluhery, Drake, Freeman, Hedge, Iverson, McLaren, Murphy,
    Neuhauser, Priebe, Szymoniak and Vilsack.

    Members Absent: Connolly (excused).

    Committee Business: Assigned bills to subcommittees; amended and
    approved SSB 2001 as a committee bill.

    Adjourned: 4:09 p.m.
                                AFTERNOON SESSION

         The Senate reconvened at 4:10 p.m., President Boswell presiding.



                              INTRODUCTION OF BILLS

         Senate File 2031, by Boswell, Husak, Judge, Kibbie, Fraise, Jensen,
    Gettings, Dearden, Gronstal, Bisignano, Sorensen, Dvorsky, Black,
    Giannetto, Deluhery, Fink, Rittmer, Murphy, Palmer, Szymoniak, Flynn,
    Lundby, Neuhauser, Banks, Iverson, Priebe, Connolly, and Hansen, a bill
    for  an act relating to the compensation of merchant marines for active
    service, creating a merchant marine service compensation fund, providing
    for administrative procedures, providing for other properly related
    matters, making an appropriation, and providing a penalty.

         Read first time and passed on file.

         Senate File 2032, by Connolly, a bill for  an act relating to
    minimum instructional time requirements for a school week.

         Read first time and passed on file.

         Senate File 2033, by Jensen and Palmer, a bill for  an act
    appropriating money from the general fund of the state to repair and
    renovate the soldiers and sailors monument of the civil war on the state
    capitol complex.

         Read first time and passed on file.

         Senate File 2034, by committee on Agriculture, a bill for  an act
    relating to county zoning of animal feeding operations.

         Read first time and placed on calendar.

         Senate File 2035, by Kibbie, a bill for  an act relating to the
    control and eradication of ecologically harmful exotic species and
    Eurasian milfoil and establishing a penalty.
         Read first time and passed on file.

         Senate File 2036, by Connolly and Kibbie, a bill for  an act
    relating to dates of active duty for purposes of the military service
    property tax exemption and providing an applicability date.

         Read first time and passed on file.

         Senate File 2037, by Kibbie and Husak, a bill for  an act relating
    to animal feeding operations by providing for county zoning of certain
    operations, and imposing requirements relating to construction permits.

         Read first time and passed on file.



                                LEAVE OF ABSENCE

         Leave of absence was granted as follows:

         Senator Rensink for the day and remainder of the week on request of
    Senator Jensen.



                                   QUORUM CALL

         Senator Horn requested a non record roll call to determine that a
    quorum was present.

         The vote revealed 47 present, 3 absent and a quorum present.

         The Senate stood at ease at 4:25 p.m. until the fall of the gavel
    for the purpose of a party caucus.

         The Senate resumed session at 5:05 p.m., President Boswell
    presiding.



                                   QUORUM CALL

         Senator Horn requested a non record roll call to determine that a
    quorum was present.

         The vote revealed 42 present, 8 absent and a quorum present.

                              CONSIDERATION OF BILL

                            (Ways and Means Calendar)

         Senator Horn asked and received unanimous consent to take up for
    consideration Senate File 2030.
    Senate File 2030

         On motion of Senator Szymoniak, Senate File 2030, a bill for an act
    relating to state and county mental health and developmental disability
    funding provisions and including an applicability provision and an
    effective date, was taken up for consideration.

         Senator Iverson offered amendment S-5002 filed by him from the
    floor to pages 1-3 of the bill and moved its adoption.

         Amendment S-5002 lost by a voice vote.

         Senator Szymoniak offered amendment S-5001 filed by her from the
    floor to pages 2 and 3 of the bill and moved its adoption.

         Amendment S-5001 was adopted by a voice vote.



                                LEAVE OF ABSENCE

         Leave of absence was granted as follows:

         Senator Kramer for the remainder of the day on request of Senator
    Bartz.



                                BUSINESS PENDING

    Senate File 2030

         The Senate resumed consideration of Senate File 2030.

         Senator Szymoniak moved that the bill be read the last time now and
    placed upon its passage, which motion prevailed by a voice vote, and the
    bill was read the last time.

         On the question Shall the bill pass? (S.F. 2030) the vote was:

    Ayes, 48:


         Banks         Bartz         Bennett       Bisignano
         Black         Boettger      Borlaug       Boswell
         Connolly      Dearden       Deluhery      Douglas
         Drake         Dvorsky       Fink          Flynn
         Fraise        Freeman       Gettings      Giannetto
         Gronstal      Halvorson     Hammond       Hansen
         Hedge         Horn          Husak         Iverson
         Jensen        Judge         Kibbie        Lind
         Lundby        Maddox        McKean        McLaren
         Murphy        Neuhauser     Palmer        Priebe
         Redfern       Rife          Rittmer       Sorensen
         Szymoniak     Tinsman       Vilsack       Zieman

    Nays, none.

    Absent or not voting, 2:

         Kramer        Rensink

         The bill having received a constitutional majority was declared to
    have passed the Senate and the title was agreed to.

         Senator Horn asked and received unanimous consent that Senate File
    2030 be immediately messaged to the House.



                              INTRODUCTION OF BILL

         Senate File 2038, by Sorensen, Giannetto, Kibbie, Neuhauser,
    Hammond, Vilsack, Halvorson, Flynn, Murphy, Dearden, McKean, Bartz,
    Zieman, Rittmer, and Judge, a bill for  an act relating to the inclusion
    of a minimum level of maternity benefits in an individual or group
    health care policy or contract issued in the state.

         Read first time and passed on file.
                                    APPENDIX



                              STUDY BILLS RECEIVED

    SSB 2009
         Judiciary

         Relating to statutory corrections which may adjust language to
    reflect current practices, insert earlier omissions, delete redundancies
    and inaccuracies, delete temporary language, resolve inconsistencies and
    conflicts, update ongoing provisions, or remove ambiguities, and
    providing effective and retroactive applicability dates.

    SSB 2010
         Judiciary

         Relating to the amount of prison time served by persons convicted
    of an aggravated misdemeanor or greater offense, by providing for
    changes in the mandatory minimum terms of sentences to be served,
    providing for a reduction in the amount of good and honor time that may
    be earned by forcible felons, providing for a legislative interim and a
    departmental study, providing for a pilot project, and making other
    related changes.

    SSB 2011
         Judiciary

         Relating to the law enforcement academys minimum vision
    requirements for entrance into approved law enforcement training
    schools.

    SSB 2012
         Judicairy

         Relating to vision requirements of the Iowa law enforcement academy
    for law enforcement officer recruits.

    SSB 2013
         Judiciary

         Relating to peace officer status for state department of
    transportation employees.

    SSB 2014
         State Government

         Relating to the powers and duties of the racing and gaming
    commission and minimum age for gambling at racetrack enclosures, and
    subjecting violators to a penalty.
    SSB 2015
         State Government

         Relating to permissible fees and commission to be paid to certified
    public accountants and accounting practitioners.

    SSB 2016
         State Government

         Relating to notaries public by establishing requirements relating
    to identification of persons and maintaining an official journal, and
    providing authorization to notaries public to sign for certain
    individuals.

    SSB 2017
         State Government

         Relating to setting the compensation for publication of certain
    notices by the superintendent of printing.

    SSB 2018
         Judiciary

         Relating to nonsubstantive Code corrections, and providing
    effective and retroactive applicability dates.

    SSB 2019
         Judiciary

         Relating to public access to criminal history data maintained by
    the department of public safety.

    SSB 2020
         Judiciary

         Relating to motor vehicle laws by prohibiting intoxication or
    simulation of intoxication in the interior of a motor vehicle,
    increasing the penalty for driving a commercial vehicle while
    disqualified, and making penalties applicable.

    SSB 2021
         Judiciary

         Relating to fingerprinting requirements for certain public
    offenses.

    SSB 2022
         Judiciary

         Relating to the arresting authority of peace officers outside the
    officers jurisdiction.
    SSB 2023
         Education

         Establishing an environmental education program in the state of
    Iowa.



                            SUBCOMMITTEE ASSIGNMENTS

                                    SSB 2009

    JUDICIARY: Bartz, Chair; Bisignano, Giannetto, Hansen and Maddox

                                    SSB 2010

    JUDICIARY: Fraise, Chair; Giannetto, McKean, Redfern and Vilsack

                                    SSB 2011

    JUDICIARY: Giannetto, Chair; Boettger, Drake, Fraise and Hansen

                                    SSB 2012

    JUDICIARY: Giannetto, Chair; Boettger, Drake, Fraise and Hansen

                                    SSB 2013

    JUDICIARY: Giannetto, Chair; Boettger, Drake, Fraise and Vilsack

                                    SSB 2014

    STATE GOVERNMENT: Bisignano, Chair; Fink and Lind

                                    SSB 2015

    STATE GOVERNMENT: Giannetto, Chair; Fink and Lind

                                    SSB 2016

    STATE GOVERNMENT: Gronstal, Chair; Dearden, Drake, Kibbie and Rittmer

                                    SSB 2017

    STATE GOVERNMENT: Gronstal, Chair; Bennett and Kibbie

                                    SSB 2018

    JUDICIARY: Maddox, Chair; Boettger, Giannetto, Neuhauser and Vilsack
                                    SSB 2019

    JUDICIARY: McKean, Chair; Giannetto, Halvorson, Hammond and Redfern

                                    SSB 2020

    JUDICIARY: Hansen, Chair; Boettger, Giannetto, Hammond and Maddox

                                    SSB 2021

    JUDICIARY: Halvorson, Chair; Bartz, Boettger, Giannetto and Szymoniak

                                    SSB 2022

    JUDICIARY: Giannetto, Chair; Drake, Hammond, Redfern and Vilsack



                           BILLS ASSIGNED TO COMMITTEE

         President Boswell announced the assignment of the following bills
    to committee:


         S.F.          2028          Appropriations
         S.F.          2029          Transportation
         S.F.          2031          Appropriations
         S.F.          2032          Education
         S.F.          2033          Appropriations
         S.F.          2035          Nat. Resources, Env. & Energy
         S.F.          2036          Ways and Means



                             PRESENTATION OF VISITOR

         Senator Horn welcomed the Honorable Tom Harkin, U.S. Senator from
    Iowa, who was present in the Senate chamber.



                                AMENDMENTS FILED


         S-5001        S.F.          2030          Elaine Szymoniak
         S-5002        S.F.          2030          Stewart Iverson, Jr.



                                   ADJOURNMENT

         On motion of Senator Horn, the Senate adjourned at 5:38 p.m., until
    9:00 a.m., Thursday, January 11, 1996.

Previous Day: Tuesday, January 9Next Day: Thursday, January 11
Senate Journal: Index House Journal: Index
Legislation: Index Bill History: Index

Return To Home Iowa General Assembly

index Index: Senate Journal (76th General Assembly: Session 2)

© 1996 Cornell College and League of Women Voters of Iowa


Comments? sjourn@legis.iowa.gov.

Last update: Mon Jan 15 12:25:09 CST 1996
URL: /DOCS/GA/76GA/Session.2/SJournal/Day/0110.html
jhf