Previous Day: Thursday, March 30 | Next Day: Tuesday, April 4 |
Senate Journal: Index | House Journal: Index |
Legislation: Index | Bill History: Index |
Previous Page: 979 | Today's Journal Page |
Senate File 2203 requires health insurance carriers and organized delivery systems (ODS) to accept written assignment of benefits from individuals covered under health benefit contracts. This assignment provides payment of benefits directly from the carrier or ODS to the health care provider. There are distinct, competing views of the impact of this legislation. The proponent groups, which include physician and hospital associations, contend the bill provides consumer choice and efficiency in the billing process. The opponent groups, which include insurers, labor organizations, and Iowa Farm Bureau, contend the bill will increase cost to consumers and will cause consumers to be balance billed - having to pay the difference between the total provider bill and the amount covered by insurance. I appreciate and support the need to improve efficiency and to ease the burden on consumers of dealing with what can be a very confusing billing process. I am, however, concerned about the cost increases that consumers could experience and the potential increased burden to taxpayers. I believe, based upon the information I have been provided, the potential cost of this bill outweighs the benefits of the billing efficiencies. I have reviewed information received from other states that have enacted legislation similar to SF 2203. While that information is not conclusive, the potential adverse fiscal impact is troublesome. It could also negatively impact a consumer's ability to access health care due to lack of adequate provider networks. I have also reviewed the fiscal note developed by the Legislative Fiscal Bureau as well as information developed by the Iowa Department of Management. The fiscal note states that the fiscal impact on the state can not be determined due to a lack of sufficient information and concludes that the bill could encourage state employees to access providers outside of a network at a possible higher cost. The Department of Management states that it is difficult to estimate the fiscal impact since it is unknown whether or not providers will continue their current contractual arrangements. It's unfortunate that legislators did not consider or discuss with me prior to passing this legislation the potential fiscal impact to the state budget. Considering the demands on the general fund and the lack of information that can more accurately define the financial risk for both taxpayers and for consumers, it would not be prudent of me to sign this legislation. I want to acknowledge the efforts that parties on both sides of this bill have made the past few days to craft a solution to the above mentioned concerns. I remain open to discussing or reviewing legislation that will address the need for a more efficient billing system, would provide for a more equitable balance in the negotiation process between insurers and providers, and would eliminate the potential risks for consumers and the state budget. For the above reasons, I hereby respectfully disapprove Senate File 2203. Sincerely, THOMAS J. VILSACK Governor
Next Page: 981 | |
Previous Day: Thursday, March 30 | Next Day: Tuesday, April 4 |
Senate Journal: Index | House Journal: Index |
Legislation: Index | Bill History: Index |
© 2000 Cornell College and League of Women Voters of Iowa
Comments about this site or page?
sjourn@legis.iowa.gov.
Please remember that the person listed above does not vote on bills. Direct all comments concerning legislation to State Legislators.
Last update: Tue Apr 4 13:35:03 CDT 2000
URL: /DOCS/GA/78GA/Session.2/SJournal/00900/00980.html
jhf