COUNTY ISSUANCE OF MOTOR VEHICLE LICENSES STUDY COMMITTEE
MINUTES
September 4, 1997 - Fourth Meeting of 1997
MEMBERS PRESENT
- Chris Van Meter, Chairperson
- Donald Breniman
- Terry Dillinger
- Robert Hagey
- Nancy Richardson (as designee for Darrell Rensink)
- Pat Milligan
|
- Richard Johnson, Vice Chairperson
- Peggy Smalley
- Daron Van Helden
- Wayne Walter
- Mary Kay Williams
- Sharon Winchell
|
MEETING IN BRIEF
Minutes prepared by Jan Simmons, Legal Counsel
Organization staffing provided by Mike Kuehn, Legal Counsel
- Administrative Matters.
- Committee Discussion and Action.
- Future Meetings.
- Materials on File With the Legislative Service Bureau.
COMMITTEE BUSINESS
- 1. Administrative Matters.
- Call to Order. Chairperson Van Meter called the meeting to order at 9:05 a.m. on September 4, 1997. The minutes were distributed, and all persons present signed an attendance sheet, which is on file with the Legislative Service Bureau.
- Approval of Minutes. There was a motion made and seconded that the minutes be approved as written. The motion was unanimously approved.
- Adjournment. The Committee adjourned at 1:55 p.m.
- 2. Committee Discussion and Action.
- Presentation by David Snodgrass. David Snodgrass, an independent consultant specializing in driver's license issuance technology, made a presentation to the Committee regarding the present and future direction of technology in driver's license issuance. He began his presentation by reviewing the state of current technology, and noted that Iowa is equipped with the most current technology: the process is digital, involves two-sided printing, is machine-readable, and includes multiple levels of security.
- Snodgrass next reviewed the future of issuance technology, which primarily will involve faster and more reliable versions of current printer technology, and will incorporate "smart card" technology, which involves the placement of a computer chip containing encrypted data within the card. Currently, four states are seriously considering moving toward smart cards, but such technology is realistically about 5 years away for most states. The cost of smart cards is significantly higher (exceeding $9.50 in a recent RFP from another state), but private industry (such as banks) may bear some or all of the cost if they may be able to utilize the technology.
- Snodgrass also reviewed national trends in the physical composition of driver's licenses and issuance systems, including detailed discussions of card security and durability features, machine-readable technologies, photo storage and transfer capabilities, and issuance system integrity and integration. Snodgrass also briefly reviewed the state of third-party issuance (i.e. an entity other than the state), noting that most states do not use such a method of issuance. If a third-party is used in the issuance process, safety should be made the primary concern, and rules and regulations regarding the issuance process, including audits and penalties for noncompliance, should be strictly enforced to ensure a uniform issuance process.
- Committee members asked some questions regarding equipment durability at the conclusion of the presentation. In general, equipment will last approximately 4 to 6 years, with printers evidencing the most wear and tear, and need for maintenance, according to the volume of use.
- Subcommittee Reports.
- Cost Subcommittee. Warren Jenkins, Chair of the Cost Subcommittee, reported on cost information from the Iowa DOT regarding the itinerant teams' incremental costs, and the follow-up work being done on the time study data from the counties.
- Quality Subcommittee. Sharon Winchell, Chair of the Quality Subcommittee, reported that the customer survey was scheduled to be sent during the coming week.
- Other Presentations.
- Iowa Farm Bureau Federation. Denny Presnall reviewed the history of the Bureau's position on the county issuance issues. The issue is not a "burning" one within the Bureau's membership. Their main concern is cost and efficiency: they support county issuance only if will not cost them more. Their formal policy on the issue is as follows:
The Farm Bureau Federation supports the consolidation of county functions within or between counties if it would save money and eliminate duplication of services.
Any consolidation of state or political subdivision functions, or transfers of responsibility between levels of government, should result in greater total savings than costs incurred by the citizens.
- State County Supervisors Association. Maury Reavis reviewed the history of the county issuance issue within the State County Supervisors Association, and emphasized that support of the county issuance process is a primary focus of his organization at the present time.
- Good Roads Association. David Scott noted that in the past, the Good Roads Association has opposed county issuance because of the cost, and because of federal threats at one point to withhold $8 million associated with problems in county issuance of commercial licenses (CDLs). The organizations supported the formation of the present study committee, however, in order to evaluate the true potential cost to the Road Use Tax Fund (RUTF). If county issuance does not cost significantly more than the current issuance process, his group will not oppose expansion of county issuance. However, the Good Roads Association will not support a significant diversion of RUTF dollars.
- Iowa State Association of Counties. John Easter stated that the Iowa State Association of Counties' position on the county issuance issue is related to "service to citizens," and noted that issue is an important one in rural areas. The Iowa State Association of Counties believes that counties should be able to opt in, and that it is a home-rule issue.
- Unfinished Business. The Committee briefly discussed other issues that may need to be addressed by the Subcommittees, but did not direct any Subcommittee to address any particular issue. The Committee also addressed the need for the Subcommittees to identify several different factual "scenarios" upon which the Subcommittees should be basing their recommendations, assumptions, definitions, and related issues. The members took the issue under advisement until the next Committee meeting.
- 3. Future Meetings.
- The full Committee is scheduled to meet on October 7, 1997, at 1 p.m., and at 10 a.m. on October 24, and November 12 and 13, 1997.
- 4. Documents on File with Legislative Service Bureau.
- a. Outline of presentation by David Snodgrass.
- b. September 1997 issue of Q & A, a newsletter published by David Snodgrass.
- c. Written policy statement of the Farm Bureau Federation on county issuance of driver's licenses.
- d. Letter from President of the Iowa State Association of County Supervisors.
- e. Fact sheet on county issuance of driver's licenses from the Iowa State Association of Counties.
- f. Brochure of 1997 Legislative Priorities of Iowa State Association of Counties.
- g. Letter from U.S. Department of Transportation, including the 1995 Final Report of Federal Review of the Iowa CDL Program.
- h. Letter from ABATE of Iowa.
- i. Letter from Iowa State Sheriffs' and Deputies' Association.
OTHER INFORMATION FOR THIS COMMITTEE:
| Charge |
Members |
Staff |
Final Report |

Comments about this site or page? webmaster@legis.iowa.gov
Please remember that the person listed above does not vote on bills. Direct all comments concerning legislation to State Legislators.
© 1995 Cornell College and League of Women Voters of Iowa
Last update: MON Feb 2 1998
sw/sam