Previous Day: Monday, April 24 | Next Day: Wednesday, April 26 |
Senate Journal: Index | House Journal: Index |
Legislation: Index | Bill History: Index |
Previous Page: 1891 | Today's Journal Page |
This file contains STRIKE and UNDERSCORE. If you cannot see either STRIKE or UNDERSCORE attributes or would like to change how these attributes are displayed, please use the following form to make the desired changes.
Number two, a total block grant relieves the state of any responsibility to put up the match that is now required for you to participate in the program. Now, you may say, well, we would do that anyway. We have a tradition in Iowa of taking care of our own. But what if you lived in a state with a booming population growth, with wildly competing demands for dollars? And what about when the next recession comes? Keep in mind, we're making all these decisions today in the second year in which every state economy is growing. That has not happened in a very long time. Will that really be fair? How do you know that there won't be insurmountable pressure in some states just to say, well, we can't take care of these children anymore; we've got to give the money to our school teachers; we've got to give the money to our road program; we've got to give the money to economic development; we've got environmental problems. So I ask you to think about those things. We can find a way to let you control the welfare system and move people from welfare to work., but there are two substantive problems with the block grant program that I want to see overcome before I sign off on it, because there is a national responsibility to care for the children of the country, to make sure a minimum standard of care is given. In the crime bill, there is a proposal to take what we did last time, which was to divide the money between police, prisons and prevention, and basically give you a block grant in prevention, and instead create two separate block grants, one for prisons and one for police and prevention, in which you would reduce the amount of money for police and prevention and increase the amount of money for prisons, but you could only get it if you decided - a mandate, but a funded one - if you decided to make all people who committed serious crimes serve 85 percent of their sentences. So Washington is telling you how you have to sentence people but offering you money to build prisons. The practical impact means that a lot of the money won't be taken care of, and we will reduce the amount of money we're spending for police and for prevention programs. I think that's a mistake. I'm more than happy for you to have block grants for prevention programs. You know more about what keeps kids out of jail and off the streets and from committing crime in Des Moines or Cedar Rapids or Ames or anyplace else than I would ever know. But we do know that the violent crime rate has tripled in the last 30 years, and the number of police on our streets has only gone up by 10 percent. And we know there is city, after city, after city in America where the crime rate has gone down a lot, a lot when police have been put on the street in community policing roles. So I say, let's keep the 100,000 police program. It is totally nonbureaucratic. Small towns in Iowa can get it by filling out a one-page, eight-question form. There is no hassle. And we should do this because we know it works. There is a national interest in safer streets, and it's all paid for by reducing the federal bureaucracy. So my view is, keep the 100,000 police, give the states flexibility on prevention. And I hope you will agree with that. That, at any rate, is my strong feeling. Lastly, let me say on education, I simply don't believe that we should be cutting education to reduce the deficit or pay for tax cuts. I don't believe that. I just don't believe that. So my view - my view on this is that the way to save money is to give every university in the country and every college in the country the right to do what Iowa State has done - go to the direct loan program, cut out the middle man, lower the cost of loans, save the taxpayer money.
Next Page: 1893 | |
Previous Day: Monday, April 24 | Next Day: Wednesday, April 26 |
Senate Journal: Index | House Journal: Index |
Legislation: Index | Bill History: Index |
© 1995 Cornell College and League of Women Voters of Iowa
Comments? hjourn@legis.iowa.gov.
Last update: Sun Jan 14 21:05:02 CST 1996
URL: /DOCS/GA/76GA/Session.1/HJournal/01800/01892.html
jhf