This file contains STRIKE and UNDERSCORE. If you cannot see either STRIKE or UNDERSCORE attributes or would like to change how these attributes are displayed, please use the following form to make the desired changes.

House Journal: Page 1279: Wednesday, April 5, 1995

Page 2  

 1   shall consider each of the following methods for
 2   reducing the impact of the proposed rule on private
 3   farm property:
 4     a.  Establishing less stringent compliance or
 5   reporting requirements in the rule for farmers.
 6     b.  Establishing less stringent schedules or
 7   deadlines in the rule for compliance or reporting
 8   requirements for farmers.
 9     c.  Consolidating or simplifying the rule's
10   compliance or reporting requirements for farmers.
11     d.  Establishing performance standards to replace
12   design or operational standards in the rule for
13   private farm property.
14     e.  Exempting private farm property from any or all
15   requirements of the rule.
16     f.  The nature of any reports and the estimated
17   cost of their preparation by farmers which would be
18   required to comply with the rule.
19     g.  The nature and estimated cost of other measures
20   or investments that would be required by farmers to
21   comply with the rule.
22     h.  The nature and estimated cost of any
23   professional, legal, consulting, or accounting
24   services which farmers would incur to comply with the
25   rule.
26     i.  The probable costs to the agency and to any
27   other agency of the implementation and enforcement of
28   the proposed rule and any anticipated effect on state
29   revenue.
30     j.  A comparison of the probable costs and benefits
31   of the proposed rule to the probable costs and
32   benefits of inaction.
33     k.  A determination of whether less costly methods
34   or less intrusive methods exist for achieving the
35   purpose of the proposed rule.
36     l.  A description of any alternative methods for
37   achieving the purpose of the proposed rule that were
38   seriously considered by the agency and the reasons
39   they were rejected in favor of the proposed rule.
40     5.  A concise summary of the regulatory flexibility
41   analysis must be published in the Iowa administrative
42   bulletin twenty days prior to the adoption of the
43   proposed rule.  The summary shall contain the place
44   where and the time when interested persons may make an
45   oral presentation on the analysis; and where persons
46   may obtain a full text of the analysis for the cost of
47   reproduction.  If the agency has made a good faith
48   effort to comply with the requirements of subsections
49   3 and 4, the rule may not be invalidated on the ground
50   that the contents of the regulatory flexibility

Iowa General Assembly

Index: House Journal (76th General Assembly: Session 1)

© 1995 Cornell College and League of Women Voters of Iowa

Comments? hjourn@legis.iowa.gov.

Last update: Sun Jan 14 21:05:02 CST 1996
URL: /DOCS/GA/76GA/Session.1/HJournal/01200/01279.html
jhf