Text: H03510 Text: H03512 Text: H03500 - H03599 Text: H Index Bills and Amendments: General Index Bill History: General Index
PAG LIN 1 1 Amend the amendment, H-3327, to House File 166 as 1 2 follows: 1 3 #1. By striking page 1, line 4, through page 3, 1 4 line 49, and inserting the following: 1 5 ""Section 1. NEW SECTION. 17A.30 PRIVATE FARM 1 6 PROPERTY REGULATORY FLEXIBILITY ANALYSIS. 1 7 1. For the purpose of this section, unless the 1 8 context otherwise requires: 1 9 a. "Farmer" means a person who owns private farm 1 10 property. 1 11 b. "Inverse condemnation" means the reduction in 1 12 the fair market value of private farm property by more 1 13 than fifty percent due to a proposed rule. 1 14 c. "Private farm property" means any real 1 15 property, including farm dwellings, improvements, 1 16 buildings, and structures, in this state owned by a 1 17 person other than the state, a political subdivision, 1 18 or other governmental entity which is used in 1 19 connection with the production of agricultural 1 20 commodities, including, but not limited to, the 1 21 raising, harvesting, drying, or storage of crops; the 1 22 maintenance of pasture or grassland; the care or 1 23 feeding of livestock including poultry; the production 1 24 of eggs or milk; and the production of fruit or other 1 25 horticultural crops. 1 26 2. If an agency proposes a rule which may impact 1 27 private farm property as an inverse condemnation, the 1 28 agency shall comply with the additional notice 1 29 provisions of subsection 3 and the analysis 1 30 requirements of subsection 4. 1 31 3. If a proposed rule may impact private farm 1 32 property as an inverse condemnation, the agency shall 1 33 include in its notice of intended agency action 1 34 pursuant to section 17A.4, in the Iowa administrative 1 35 bulletin that the proposed rule-making may be an 1 36 inverse condemnation. The agency shall notify farm 1 37 organizations who have registered with the agency 1 38 requesting notification. 1 39 4. An agency shall issue a regulatory flexibility 1 40 analysis of a proposed rule, if the agency finds that 1 41 the proposed rule may impact private farm property as 1 42 an inverse condemnation, or if within twenty days 1 43 after the published notice of the proposed rule 1 44 adoption, a written request for the analysis is filed 1 45 with the appropriate agency by the administrative 1 46 rules review committee, the governor, a political 1 47 subdivision, at least twenty-five farmers, or a 1 48 registered organization representing at least twenty- 1 49 five farmers. 1 50 The agency in its regulatory flexibility analysis 2 1 shall consider each of the following methods for 2 2 reducing the impact of the proposed rule on private 2 3 farm property: 2 4 a. Establishing less stringent compliance or 2 5 reporting requirements in the rule for farmers. 2 6 b. Establishing less stringent schedules or 2 7 deadlines in the rule for compliance or reporting 2 8 requirements for farmers. 2 9 c. Consolidating or simplifying the rule's 2 10 compliance or reporting requirements for farmers. 2 11 d. Establishing performance standards to replace 2 12 design or operational standards in the rule for 2 13 private farm property. 2 14 e. Exempting private farm property from any or all 2 15 requirements of the rule. 2 16 f. The nature of any reports and the estimated 2 17 cost of their preparation by farmers which would be 2 18 required to comply with the rule. 2 19 g. The nature and estimated cost of other measures 2 20 or investments that would be required by farmers to 2 21 comply with the rule. 2 22 h. The nature and estimated cost of any 2 23 professional, legal, consulting, or accounting 2 24 services which farmers would incur to comply with the 2 25 rule. 2 26 i. The probable costs to the agency and to any 2 27 other agency of the implementation and enforcement of 2 28 the proposed rule and any anticipated effect on state 2 29 revenue. 2 30 j. A comparison of the probable costs and benefits 2 31 of the proposed rule to the probable costs and 2 32 benefits of inaction. 2 33 k. A determination of whether less costly methods 2 34 or less intrusive methods exist for achieving the 2 35 purpose of the proposed rule. 2 36 l. A description of any alternative methods for 2 37 achieving the purpose of the proposed rule that were 2 38 seriously considered by the agency and the reasons 2 39 they were rejected in favor of the proposed rule. 2 40 5. A concise summary of the regulatory flexibility 2 41 analysis must be published in the Iowa administrative 2 42 bulletin twenty days prior to the adoption of the 2 43 proposed rule. The summary shall contain the place 2 44 where and the time when interested persons may make an 2 45 oral presentation on the analysis; and where persons 2 46 may obtain a full text of the analysis for the cost of 2 47 reproduction. If the agency has made a good faith 2 48 effort to comply with the requirements of subsections 2 49 3 and 4, the rule may not be invalidated on the ground 2 50 that the contents of the regulatory flexibility 3 1 analysis are insufficient or inaccurate. 3 2 6. The agency shall reduce the impact by using a 3 3 method provided or requested under subsection 4 if it 3 4 finds that the methods are legal and feasible in 3 5 meeting the statutory objectives which are the basis 3 6 of the proposed rule. 3 7 Sec. 2. Section 17A.32, Code 1995, is amended to 3 8 read as follows: 3 9 17A.32 TIME LIMIT APPLICABLE TO EMERGENCY RULES. 3 10 A rule of an emergency nature adopted under section 3 11 17A.4, subsection 2, or made effective under the 3 12 provisions of section 17A.5, subsection 2, paragraph 3 13 b, is not subject to the provisions of section 17A.30 3 14 or 17A.31 until ninety days have elapsed from the day 3 15 of the emergency rule's publication. If subsections 3 3 16 and 4 of section 17A.30 or subsections 3 and 4 of 3 17 17A.31 have not been complied with within this ninety- 3 18 day period, the rule is void. 3 19 Sec. 3. Section 17A.33, Code 1995, is amended to 3 20 read as follows: 3 21 17A.33 REVIEW BY ADMINISTRATIVE RULES REVIEW 3 22 COMMITTEE. 3 23 The administrative rules review committee shall 3 24 review existing rules, as time permits, to determine 3 25 if there are adverse or beneficial effects from these 3 26 rules. The committee shall give a high priority to 3 27 rules that are referred to it by twenty-five or more 3 28 farmers or a registered farm organization as provided 3 29 in section 17A.30 or a small business as defined in 3 30 section 17A.31. The review of these rules shall be 3 31 forwarded to the appropriate standing committees of 3 32 the house and senate."" 3 33 3 34 3 35 3 36 BERNAU of Story 3 37 HF 166.712 76 3 38 da/sc
Text: H03510 Text: H03512 Text: H03500 - H03599 Text: H Index Bills and Amendments: General Index Bill History: General Index
© 1996 Cornell College and League of Women Voters of Iowa
Comments? webmaster@legis.iowa.gov.
Last update: Thu Feb 8 16:38:58 CST 1996
URL: /DOCS/GA/76GA/Legislation/H/03500/H03511/950327.html
jhf