Text: HF02157                           Text: HF02159
Text: HF02100 - HF02199                 Text: HF Index
Bills and Amendments: General Index     Bill History: General Index



House File 2158

Partial Bill History

Bill Text

PAG LIN
  1  1    Section 1.  Section 598.7A, Code Supplement 2001, is
  1  2 amended to read as follows:
  1  3    598.7A  MEDIATION.
  1  4    1.  The district court may, on its own motion or on the
  1  5 motion of any party, order the parties to participate in
  1  6 mediation in any dissolution of marriage action or other
  1  7 domestic relations action.  Mediation performed under this
  1  8 section shall comply with the provisions of chapter 679C.  The
  1  9 provisions of this section shall not apply if the action
  1 10 involves a child support or medical support obligation
  1 11 enforced by the child support recovery unit.  The provisions
  1 12 of this section shall not apply to actions which involve
  1 13 domestic abuse pursuant to chapter 236 or actions which
  1 14 involve founded child abuse pursuant to section 232.71D.  The
  1 15 provisions of this section shall not affect a judicial
  1 16 district's or court's authority to order settlement
  1 17 conferences pursuant to rules of civil procedure.  The court
  1 18 shall, on application of a party, grant a waiver from any
  1 19 court-ordered mediation under this section if the party
  1 20 demonstrates that a history of domestic abuse exists as
  1 21 specified in section 598.41, subsection 3, paragraph "j", or
  1 22 if the party demonstrates that a history of founded child
  1 23 abuse exists as specified in section 598.41, subsection 3,
  1 24 paragraph "k".
  1 25    Sec. 2.  Section 598.41, subsection 1, paragraphs b, c, and
  1 26 d, Code 2001, are amended to read as follows:
  1 27    b.  Notwithstanding paragraph "a", if the court finds that
  1 28 a history of domestic abuse exists or a history of founded
  1 29 child abuse exists, a rebuttable presumption against the
  1 30 awarding of joint custody exists.
  1 31    c.  The court shall consider the denial by one parent of
  1 32 the child's opportunity for maximum continuing contact with
  1 33 the other parent, without just cause, a significant factor in
  1 34 determining the proper custody arrangement.  Just cause may
  1 35 include a determination by the court pursuant to subsection 3,
  2  1 paragraph "j", that a history of domestic abuse exists between
  2  2 the parents or a determination by the court pursuant to
  2  3 subsection 3, paragraph "k", that a history of founded child
  2  4 abuse exists.
  2  5    d.  If a history of domestic abuse exists as determined by
  2  6 a court pursuant to subsection 3, paragraph "j", and if a
  2  7 parent who is a victim of such domestic abuse relocates or is
  2  8 absent from the home based upon the fear of or actual acts or
  2  9 threats of domestic abuse perpetrated by the other parent, or
  2 10 if a history of founded child abuse exists as determined by a
  2 11 court pursuant to subsection 3, paragraph "k", the court shall
  2 12 not consider the relocation or absence of that the parent who
  2 13 is the victim of domestic abuse or the parent who is not the
  2 14 perpetrator of the founded child abuse as a factor against
  2 15 that parent in the awarding of custody or visitation.
  2 16    Sec. 3.  Section 598.41, subsection 2, paragraphs c and d,
  2 17 Code 2001, are amended to read as follows:
  2 18    c.  A finding by the court that a history of domestic abuse
  2 19 exists, as specified in subsection 3, paragraph "j", or a
  2 20 finding by the court that a history of founded child abuse
  2 21 exists, as specified in subsection 3, paragraph "k", which is
  2 22 not rebutted, shall outweigh consideration of any other factor
  2 23 specified in subsection 3 in the determination of the awarding
  2 24 of custody under this subsection.
  2 25    d.  Before ruling upon the joint custody petition in these
  2 26 cases, unless the court determines that a history of domestic
  2 27 abuse exists as specified in subsection 3, paragraph "j", or
  2 28 unless the court determines that a history of founded child
  2 29 abuse exists as specified in subsection 3, paragraph "k", or
  2 30 unless the court determines that direct physical harm or
  2 31 significant emotional harm to the child, other children, or a
  2 32 parent is likely to result, the court may require the parties
  2 33 to participate in custody mediation to determine whether joint
  2 34 custody is in the best interest of the child.  The court may
  2 35 require the child's participation in the mediation insofar as
  3  1 the court determines the child's participation is advisable.
  3  2    Sec. 4.  Section 598.41, subsection 3, Code 2001, is
  3  3 amended by adding the following new paragraph:
  3  4    NEW PARAGRAPH.  k.  Whether a history of founded child
  3  5 abuse pursuant to section 232.71D exists.
  3  6    Sec. 5.  Section 598.41, subsection 8, Code 2001, is
  3  7 amended to read as follows:
  3  8    8.  If an application for modification of a decree or a
  3  9 petition for modification of an order is filed, based upon
  3 10 differences between the parents regarding the custody
  3 11 arrangement established under the decree or order, unless the
  3 12 court determines that a history of domestic abuse exists as
  3 13 specified in subsection 3, paragraph "j", or unless the court
  3 14 determines that a history of founded child abuse exists as
  3 15 specified in subsection 3, paragraph "k", or unless the court
  3 16 determines that direct physical harm or significant emotional
  3 17 harm to the child, other children, or a parent is likely to
  3 18 result, the court may require the parents to participate in
  3 19 mediation to attempt to resolve the differences between the
  3 20 parents.  
  3 21                           EXPLANATION
  3 22    This bill provides that a history of founded child abuse,
  3 23 as is currently the case with a history of domestic abuse, is
  3 24 to be a consideration in the awarding of custody of a child.
  3 25 The bill provides in addition to a history of domestic abuse,
  3 26 if a history of founded child abuse exists, a rebuttable
  3 27 presumption against the awarding of joint custody exists.
  3 28    Current law provides that the court is to consider the
  3 29 denial by one parent of the opportunity for maximum continuing
  3 30 contact with the other parent, without just cause, a
  3 31 significant factor in the awarding of custody.  Under the
  3 32 bill, "just cause" would include a determination by the court
  3 33 that a history of founded child abuse exists.
  3 34    The bill also provides that if a history of founded child
  3 35 abuse exists, the court shall not consider the relocation or
  4  1 absence of the parent who is not the perpetrator of the
  4  2 founded child abuse as a factor against that parent in the
  4  3 awarding of custody or visitation.
  4  4    Under the bill, a finding by the court that a history of
  4  5 founded child abuse exists, which is not rebutted, outweighs
  4  6 consideration of any other factor specified to be considered
  4  7 by the court in the determination of the awarding of custody
  4  8 when the parents do not agree to joint custody.
  4  9    The bill provides that before ruling upon the joint custody
  4 10 petition in cases in which the parents do not agree to joint
  4 11 custody, in addition to other contingences, unless the court
  4 12 determines that a history of founded child abuse exists, the
  4 13 court may require the parties to participate in custody
  4 14 mediation to determine whether joint custody is in the best
  4 15 interest of the child.
  4 16    The bill requires that one of the factors that the court is
  4 17 to consider when determining if the custody arrangement is in
  4 18 the best interest of the child is whether a history of founded
  4 19 child abuse exists.
  4 20    The bill also provides that if an application for
  4 21 modification of a decree or a petition for modification of an
  4 22 order is filed, based upon differences between the parents
  4 23 regarding the custody arrangement established under the decree
  4 24 or order, the court may require the parents to participate in
  4 25 mediation to attempt to resolve the differences between the
  4 26 parents unless, in addition to existing considerations, the
  4 27 court determines that a history of founded child abuse exists.
  4 28    The bill also makes a conforming change relating to
  4 29 mediation in domestic relations proceedings to provide for
  4 30 consideration of a history of founded child abuse in the
  4 31 decision to order the mediation.  
  4 32 LSB 6046HH 79
  4 33 pf/cf/24
     

Text: HF02157                           Text: HF02159
Text: HF02100 - HF02199                 Text: HF Index
Bills and Amendments: General Index     Bill History: General Index

Return To Home index


© 2002 Cornell College and League of Women Voters of Iowa


Comments about this site or page? webmaster@legis.iowa.gov.
Please remember that the person listed above does not vote on bills. Direct all comments concerning legislation to State Legislators.

Last update: Wed Feb 6 03:30:22 CST 2002
URL: /DOCS/GA/79GA/Legislation/HF/02100/HF02158/020129.html
jhf