Text: H08176 Text: H08178 Text: H08100 - H08199 Text: H Index Bills and Amendments: General Index Bill History: General Index
PAG LIN 1 1 Amend House File 2494 as follows: 1 2 #1. Page 37, by inserting after line 24 the 1 3 following: 1 4 "Sec. ___. Section 657.11, subsections 2, 3, 5, 6, 1 5 7, and 8, Code 1997, are amended to read as follows: 1 6 2.If a person has received all permits required1 7pursuant to chapter 455B for an animal feeding1 8operation, as defined in section 455B.161, there shall1 9be a rebuttable presumption that anAn animal feeding 1 10 operationis, as defined in section 455B.161, shall 1 11 not be found to be a public or private nuisance under 1 12 this chapter or under principles of common law, and 1 13thatthe animal feeding operationdoesshall not be 1 14 found to unreasonably andcontinuouslyfor substantial 1 15 periods of time interfere with another person's 1 16 comfortable use and enjoyment of the person's life or 1 17 property under any other cause of action.The1 18rebuttable presumption also applies to persons who are1 19not required to obtain a permit pursuant to chapter1 20455B for an animal feeding operation as defined in1 21section 455B.161. The rebuttable presumptionHowever, 1 22 this section shall not apply if the person bringing 1 23 the action proves that an injury toathe person or 1 24 damage to the person's property is proximately caused 1 25 byaeither of the following: 1 26 a. The failure to comply with a federal statute or 1 27 regulation or a state statute or rule which applies to 1 28 the animal feeding operation. 1 29 b.3. The rebuttable presumption may be overcome1 30by clear and convincing evidence of bothBoth of the 1 31 following: 1 32a.(1) The animal feeding operation unreasonably 1 33 andcontinuouslyfor substantial periods of time 1 34 interferes withanotherthe person's comfortable use 1 35 and enjoyment of the person's life or property. 1 36b.(2) Theinjury or damage is proximately caused1 37by the negligent operation of theanimal feeding 1 38 operation failed to use existing prudent generally 1 39 accepted management practices reasonable for the 1 40 operation. 1 41 5.The rebuttable presumption created by thisThis 1 42 section shall apply regardless of the established date 1 43 of operation or expansion of the animal feeding 1 44 operation.The rebuttable presumptionA defense 1 45 against a cause of action provided in this section 1 46 includes, but is not limited to, a defense for actions 1 47 arising out of the care and feeding of animals; the 1 48 handling or transportation of animals; the treatment 1 49 or disposal of manure resulting from animals; the 1 50 transportation and application of animal manure; and 2 1 the creation of noise, odor, dust, or fumes arising 2 2 from an animal feeding operation. 2 3 6.An animal feeding operation that complies with2 4the requirements in chapter 455B for animal feeding2 5operations shall be deemed to meet any common law2 6requirements regarding the standard of a normal person2 7living in the locality of the operation.2 87. AIf a court determines that a claim is 2 9 frivolous, a person who brings the claim as part of a 2 10 losing cause of action against a personfor whom the2 11rebuttable presumption createdwho may raise a defense 2 12 under this sectionis not rebutted,shall be liable to 2 13 the person against whom the action was brought for all 2 14 costs and expenses incurred in the defense of the 2 15 action, if the court determines that a claim is2 16frivolous. 2 17 8.The rebuttable presumption created in thisThis 2 18 section does not apply to an injury to a person or 2 19 damages to property caused by the animal feeding 2 20 operation before May 31, 1995. 2 21 Sec. ___. Section 657.11, subsection 4, unnumbered 2 22 paragraph 1, Code 1997, is amended to read as follows: 2 23 4.The rebuttable presumptionThis section does 2 24 not apply to a person against whom a cause of action 2 25 is brought as provided in this section during any 2 26 period that the person is classified as a chronic 2 27 violator under this subsection as to any confinement 2 28 feeding operation in which the person holds a 2 29 controlling interest, as defined by rules adopted by 2 30 the department of natural resources.The rebuttable2 31presumptionThis section shall apply to the person on 2 32 and after the date that the person is removed from the 2 33 classification of chronic violator. For purposes of 2 34 this subsection, "confinement feeding operation" means 2 35an animal feeding operation in which animals are2 36confined to areas which are totally roofed, and which2 37are regulated by the department of natural resources2 38or the environmental protection commissionthe same as 2 39 defined in section 455B.161." 2 40 #2. By renumbering as necessary. 2 41 2 42 2 43 2 44 WISE of Lee 2 45 2 46 2 47 2 48 BELL of Jasper 2 49 2 50 3 1 3 2 FALCK of Fayette 3 3 3 4 3 5 3 6 LARKIN of Lee 3 7 3 8 3 9 3 10 MAY of Worth 3 11 3 12 3 13 3 14 MERTZ of Kossuth 3 15 3 16 3 17 3 18 O'BRIEN of Boone 3 19 3 20 3 21 3 22 THOMAS of Clayton 3 23 HF 2494.505 77 3 24 da/jw/28
Text: H08176 Text: H08178 Text: H08100 - H08199 Text: H Index Bills and Amendments: General Index Bill History: General Index
© 1998 Cornell College and League of Women Voters of Iowa
Comments about this site or page?
webmaster@legis.iowa.gov.
Please remember that the person listed above does not vote on bills. Direct all comments concerning legislation to State Legislators.
Last update: Wed Mar 4 03:45:35 CST 1998
URL: /DOCS/GA/77GA/Legislation/H/08100/H08177/980303.html
jhf