Senate
File
446
-
Reprinted
SENATE
FILE
446
BY
COMMITTEE
ON
JUDICIARY
(SUCCESSOR
TO
SSB
1148)
(As
Amended
and
Passed
by
the
Senate
March
28,
2017
)
A
BILL
FOR
An
Act
relating
to
asset
forfeiture
by
prohibiting
civil
1
asset
forfeiture
for
property
valued
at
less
than
a
minimum
2
amount,
raising
the
standard
of
proof
for
asset
forfeiture,
3
requiring
a
proportionality
review
for
property
to
be
4
forfeited,
and
requiring
law
enforcement
agencies
to
retain
5
certain
records
related
to
asset
forfeiture
and
including
6
applicability
provisions.
7
BE
IT
ENACTED
BY
THE
GENERAL
ASSEMBLY
OF
THE
STATE
OF
IOWA:
8
SF
446
(2)
87
jh/nh/jh
S.F.
446
Section
1.
Section
809A.1,
Code
2017,
is
amended
by
adding
1
the
following
new
subsections:
2
NEW
SUBSECTION
.
01.
“Convicted”
or
“conviction”
includes
3
a
finding
of
guilt,
a
plea
of
guilty,
deferred
judgment,
4
deferred
or
suspended
sentence,
adjudication
of
delinquency,
5
or
circumstances
where
a
person
is
not
charged
with
a
criminal
6
offense
that
is
a
serious
or
aggravated
misdemeanor
or
felony
7
related
to
the
action
for
forfeiture
based
in
whole
or
in
part
8
on
the
person’s
cooperation
in
providing
information
regarding
9
the
criminal
activity
of
another
person.
10
NEW
SUBSECTION
.
001.
“Instrumentality”
means
property
11
otherwise
lawful
to
possess
that
is
used
in
or
intended
to
be
12
used
in
a
public
offense.
13
NEW
SUBSECTION
.
1A.
“Minimum
civil
forfeiture
amount”
means
14
five
thousand
dollars.
15
Sec.
2.
Section
809A.5,
subsection
2,
paragraph
b,
Code
16
2017,
is
amended
to
read
as
follows:
17
b.
The
owner
or
interest
holder
is
criminally
responsible
18
for
the
conduct
giving
rise
to
its
forfeiture
,
whether
or
not
19
the
owner
or
interest
holder
is
prosecuted
or
convicted
.
If
20
the
forfeiture
is
for
property
valued
at
less
than
the
minimum
21
civil
forfeiture
amount,
the
owner
or
interest
holder
must
also
22
be
convicted
of
the
criminal
offense
for
the
conduct
giving
23
rise
to
forfeiture.
24
Sec.
3.
Section
809A.8,
subsection
1,
paragraph
a,
25
subparagraph
(2),
Code
2017,
is
amended
to
read
as
follows:
26
(2)
File
a
judicial
forfeiture
proceeding
within
ninety
27
days
after
notice
of
pending
forfeiture
of
property
upon
which
28
a
proper
claim
has
been
timely
filed
pursuant
to
section
29
809A.11
,
or,
if
the
value
of
the
property
is
less
than
the
30
minimum
civil
forfeiture
amount,
file
a
judicial
forfeiture
31
proceeding
within
ninety
days
after
the
conclusion
of
the
32
criminal
prosecution
.
33
Sec.
4.
Section
809A.8,
subsection
1,
paragraph
d,
34
unnumbered
paragraph
1,
Code
2017,
is
amended
to
read
as
35
-1-
SF
446
(2)
87
jh/nh/jh
1/
6
S.F.
446
follows:
1
If
a
petition
is
timely
filed,
the
prosecuting
attorney
may
2
delay
filing
a
judicial
forfeiture
proceeding
for
one
hundred
3
eighty
days
after
the
notice
of
pending
forfeiture,
or,
if
the
4
value
of
the
property
is
less
than
the
minimum
civil
forfeiture
5
amount,
one
hundred
eighty
days
after
the
conclusion
of
the
6
criminal
prosecution,
and
the
following
procedures
shall
apply:
7
Sec.
5.
Section
809A.12,
subsections
6,
7,
and
14,
Code
8
2017,
are
amended
to
read
as
follows:
9
6.
A
defendant
convicted
in
any
whose
criminal
proceeding
10
results
in
a
conviction
is
precluded
from
later
denying
the
11
essential
allegations
of
the
criminal
offense
of
which
the
12
defendant
was
convicted
in
any
proceeding
pursuant
to
this
13
section
.
For
the
purposes
of
this
section
,
a
conviction
14
results
from
a
verdict
or
a
plea
of
guilty.
A
defendant
15
whose
conviction
is
overturned
on
appeal
may
file
a
motion
to
16
correct,
vacate,
or
modify
a
judgment
of
forfeiture
under
this
17
subsection
.
18
7.
In
any
proceeding
under
this
chapter
,
if
a
claim
is
based
19
on
an
exemption
provided
for
in
this
chapter
,
the
burden
of
20
proving
the
existence
of
the
exemption
is
on
the
claimant
must
21
make
a
prima
facie
showing
of
the
existence
of
the
exemption
.
22
However,
once
the
claimant
comes
forward
with
some
evidence
23
supporting
the
existence
of
the
exemption,
the
state
The
24
prosecuting
attorney
must
provide
some
evidence
to
negate
the
25
assertion
of
the
then
prove
by
clear
and
convincing
evidence
26
that
the
exemption
does
not
apply
.
The
state’s
evidence
must
27
be
substantial,
though
not
necessarily
rising
to
the
level
of
a
28
preponderance
of
the
evidence,
and
more
than
a
simple
assertion
29
of
the
claimant’s
interest
in
the
property.
The
agency
or
30
political
subdivision
bringing
the
forfeiture
action
shall
31
pay
the
reasonable
attorney
fees
and
costs,
as
determined
by
32
the
court,
incurred
by
a
claimant
who
prevails
on
a
claim
for
33
exemption
in
a
proceeding
under
this
chapter
.
34
14.
An
acquittal
or
dismissal
in
a
criminal
proceeding
shall
35
-2-
SF
446
(2)
87
jh/nh/jh
2/
6
S.F.
446
not
preclude
civil
proceedings
under
this
chapter
if
the
value
1
of
the
property
to
be
forfeited
is
equal
to
or
exceeds
the
2
minimum
civil
forfeiture
amount
.
3
Sec.
6.
Section
809A.12,
Code
2017,
is
amended
by
adding
the
4
following
new
subsection:
5
NEW
SUBSECTION
.
7A.
The
prosecuting
attorney
must
prove
6
by
clear
and
convincing
evidence
that
the
property
is
property
7
subject
to
forfeiture.
8
Sec.
7.
Section
809A.12,
subsection
10,
paragraph
a,
Code
9
2017,
is
amended
to
read
as
follows:
10
a.
The
If
the
property
to
be
forfeited
is
equal
to
or
11
exceeds
the
minimum
civil
forfeiture
amount,
that
the
person
12
has
engaged
in
conduct
giving
rise
to
forfeiture.
If
the
13
property
to
be
forfeited
is
less
than
the
minimum
civil
14
forfeiture
amount,
that
the
person
was
convicted
for
the
15
conduct
giving
rise
to
forfeiture.
16
Sec.
8.
NEW
SECTION
.
809A.12A
Limitations
on
civil
17
forfeiture.
18
1.
If
the
total
value
of
the
property
seized
for
forfeiture
19
is
less
than
the
minimum
civil
forfeiture
amount,
a
judicial
20
forfeiture
proceeding
shall
not
be
brought
unless
one
of
the
21
following
applies:
22
a.
The
conduct
giving
rise
to
forfeiture
resulted
in
a
23
conviction.
24
b.
The
property
owner
is
deceased.
25
c.
Charges
have
been
filed
against
the
property
owner,
a
26
warrant
was
issued
for
the
arrest
of
the
property
owner,
and
27
either
of
the
following
applies:
28
(1)
The
property
owner
is
outside
the
state
and
is
unable
to
29
be
extradited
or
brought
back
to
the
state
for
prosecution.
30
(2)
Law
enforcement
has
made
reasonable
efforts
to
locate
31
and
arrest
the
property
owner,
but
the
property
owner
has
not
32
been
located.
33
d.
The
property
owner
has
not
claimed
the
property
subject
34
to
forfeiture
or
asserted
any
interest
in
the
property
at
any
35
-3-
SF
446
(2)
87
jh/nh/jh
3/
6
S.F.
446
time
during
or
after
the
seizure
of
the
property,
and
all
1
claims
brought
under
section
809A.11
have
been
denied.
2
2.
The
prosecuting
attorney
has
the
burden
to
prove
by
3
clear
and
convincing
evidence
that
the
value
of
the
property
4
is
or
exceeds
the
minimum
civil
forfeiture
amount
in
any
civil
5
action.
6
Sec.
9.
NEW
SECTION
.
809A.12B
Proportionality
review.
7
1.
Property
shall
not
be
forfeited
as
an
instrumentality
8
under
this
chapter
to
the
extent
that
the
amount
or
value
of
9
the
property
is
grossly
disproportionate
to
the
severity
of
the
10
offense.
11
2.
Contraband
and
any
proceeds
obtained
from
the
offense
are
12
not
subject
to
proportionality
review
under
this
section.
13
Sec.
10.
Section
809A.13,
subsections
7
and
8,
Code
2017,
14
are
amended
to
read
as
follows:
15
7.
The
forfeiture
hearing
shall
be
held
without
a
jury
16
and
within
sixty
days
after
service
of
the
complaint
unless
17
continued
for
good
cause.
The
prosecuting
attorney
shall
18
have
the
initial
burden
of
proving
by
clear
and
convincing
19
evidence
that
the
property
is
subject
to
forfeiture
by
a
20
preponderance
of
the
evidence
.
If
the
state
so
proves
the
21
property
is
subject
to
forfeiture,
the
claimant
has
the
burden
22
of
proving
may
assert
that
the
claimant
has
an
interest
in
the
23
property
which
is
exempt
from
forfeiture
under
this
chapter
by
24
a
preponderance
of
the
evidence
.
If
the
claimant
asserts
and
25
makes
a
prima
facie
showing
of
the
existence
of
the
exemption,
26
the
prosecuting
attorney
then
has
the
burden
of
proving
by
27
clear
and
convincing
evidence
that
the
exemption
does
not
28
apply.
29
8.
The
court
shall
order
the
interest
in
the
property
30
returned
or
conveyed
to
the
claimant
if
the
prosecuting
31
attorney
fails
to
meet
the
state’s
burden
or
the
claimant
32
establishes
by
a
preponderance
of
the
evidence
that
the
33
claimant
has
an
interest
that
is
exempt
from
forfeiture
.
The
34
court
shall
order
all
other
property
forfeited
to
the
state
and
35
-4-
SF
446
(2)
87
jh/nh/jh
4/
6
S.F.
446
conduct
further
proceedings
pursuant
to
sections
809A.16
and
1
809A.17
.
2
Sec.
11.
Section
809A.14,
subsection
7,
paragraph
d,
Code
3
2017,
is
amended
to
read
as
follows:
4
d.
In
accordance
with
the
findings
made
at
the
hearing,
the
5
court
may
amend
the
order
of
forfeiture
if
it
determines
that
6
any
claimant
has
established
by
a
preponderance
of
the
evidence
7
that
the
claimant
has
properly
petitioned
for
recognition
8
of
exemption
under
section
809A.11
and
that
the
prosecuting
9
attorney
has
not
shown,
by
clear
and
convincing
evidence,
that
10
the
claimant
does
not
have
an
interest
in
the
property
which
is
11
exempt
under
the
provisions
of
section
809A.5
.
12
Sec.
12.
Section
809A.15,
subsection
1,
unnumbered
13
paragraph
1,
Code
2017,
is
amended
to
read
as
follows:
14
The
court
shall
order
the
forfeiture
of
any
other
property
15
of
a
person,
including
a
claimant,
up
to
the
value
of
16
that
person’s
property
found
by
the
court
to
be
subject
to
17
forfeiture
under
this
chapter
,
if
the
prosecuting
attorney
18
proves
by
clear
and
convincing
evidence
that
any
of
the
19
following
applies
to
the
person’s
forfeitable
property:
20
Sec.
13.
Section
809A.16,
subsection
2,
Code
2017,
is
21
amended
to
read
as
follows:
22
2.
Within
one
hundred
eighty
days
of
the
date
of
a
23
declaration
of
forfeiture,
an
owner
or
interest
holder
in
24
property
declared
forfeited
pursuant
to
subsection
1
may
25
petition
the
court
to
have
the
declaration
of
forfeiture
set
26
aside,
after
making
a
prima
facie
showing
that
the
state
failed
27
to
serve
proper
notice
as
provided
by
section
809A.13
.
Upon
28
such
a
showing
the
court
shall
allow
the
state
to
demonstrate
29
by
a
preponderance
of
the
clear
and
convincing
evidence
that
30
notice
was
properly
served.
If
the
state
fails
to
meet
31
its
burden
of
proof,
the
court
may
order
the
declaration
of
32
forfeiture
set
aside.
The
state
may
proceed
with
judicial
33
proceedings
pursuant
to
this
chapter
.
34
Sec.
14.
NEW
SECTION
.
809A.18A
Recordkeeping.
35
-5-
SF
446
(2)
87
jh/nh/jh
5/
6
S.F.
446
1.
Each
law
enforcement
agency
that
has
custody
of
any
1
property
that
is
subject
to
this
chapter
shall
adopt
and
comply
2
with
a
written
internal
control
policy
that
does
all
of
the
3
following:
4
a.
Provides
for
keeping
detailed
records
as
to
the
amount
5
of
property
acquired
by
the
agency
and
the
date
property
was
6
acquired.
7
b.
Provides
for
keeping
detailed
records
of
the
disposition
8
of
the
property,
which
shall
include
but
not
be
limited
to
all
9
of
the
following:
10
(1)
The
manner
in
which
the
property
was
disposed,
the
11
date
of
disposition,
and
detailed
financial
records
concerning
12
any
property
sold.
The
records
shall
not
identify
or
enable
13
identification
of
the
individual
officer
who
seized
any
item
of
14
property
or
the
name
of
any
person
or
entity
who
received
any
15
item
of
property.
16
(2)
An
itemized
list
of
the
specific
expenditures
made
17
with
amounts
that
are
gained
from
the
sale
of
the
property
and
18
that
are
retained
by
the
agency,
including
the
specific
amount
19
expended
on
each
expenditure,
except
that
the
policy
shall
20
not
provide
for
or
permit
the
identification
of
any
specific
21
expenditure
that
is
made
in
an
ongoing
investigation.
22
2.
The
records
kept
under
the
internal
control
policy
23
shall
be
open
to
public
inspection
during
the
agency’s
regular
24
business
hours.
The
policy
adopted
under
this
section
is
a
25
public
record
open
for
inspection
under
chapter
22.
26
Sec.
15.
APPLICABILITY.
This
Act
applies
to
forfeiture
27
proceedings
that
begin
on
or
after
the
effective
date
of
this
28
Act.
29
-6-
SF
446
(2)
87
jh/nh/jh
6/
6