House
Study
Bill
780
-
Introduced
HOUSE
FILE
_____
BY
(PROPOSED
COMMITTEE
ON
GOVERNMENT
OVERSIGHT
BILL
BY
CHAIRPERSON
THOMSON)
A
BILL
FOR
An
Act
prohibiting
warrant
resolution
clinics,
including
1
enforcement
mechanisms,
providing
penalties,
and
including
2
effective
date
provisions.
3
BE
IT
ENACTED
BY
THE
GENERAL
ASSEMBLY
OF
THE
STATE
OF
IOWA:
4
TLSB
6968YC
(6)
91
as/js
H.F.
_____
Section
1.
NEW
SECTION
.
804.32
Warrant
resolution
clinics
1
prohibited.
2
1.
As
used
in
this
section,
“warrant
resolution
clinic”
3
means
any
prearranged
event,
program,
assembly,
arrangement,
4
docket
setting,
or
coordinated
effort,
whether
formal
or
5
informal,
other
than
a
regularly
scheduled
court
proceeding
6
held
within
a
courthouse
or
judicial
facility,
designed
or
7
having
the
practical
effect
of
allowing
individuals
with
8
outstanding
arrest
warrants
to
appear
and
resolve
such
warrants
9
without
being
subject
to
immediate
arrest
and
custodial
10
processing,
regardless
of
how
such
event,
program,
assembly,
11
arrangement,
docket
setting,
or
effort
is
designated
or
12
characterized.
13
2.
An
entity,
organization,
county
attorney,
law
14
enforcement
agency,
judicial
officer,
nonprofit
organization,
15
or
any
other
person
shall
not
organize,
sponsor,
host,
fund,
16
promote,
or
participate
in
a
warrant
resolution
clinic.
17
3.
A
person
who
has
an
outstanding
warrant
for
the
person’s
18
arrest
shall
only
resolve
such
warrant
by
any
of
the
following:
19
a.
Surrendering
to
a
peace
officer
or
at
a
law
enforcement
20
agency.
21
b.
Appearing
at
a
scheduled
court
hearing
as
directed
by
a
22
magistrate
or
judge
under
standard
judicial
procedures.
23
c.
Through
a
written
motion
filed
in
an
individual,
pending
24
case,
agreed
to
by
the
prosecuting
attorney,
and
ruled
on
by
25
the
court
under
standard
judicial
procedures
in
the
ordinary
26
course
of
the
case,
and
not
as
part
of
any
event,
program,
or
27
arrangement
prohibited
by
this
section.
28
4.
The
use
of
public
funds
or
facilities
for
the
purpose
of
29
hosting
a
warrant
resolution
clinic
is
strictly
prohibited.
30
5.
A
person
shall
not
shall
evade
or
attempt
to
evade
the
31
prohibitions
of
this
section
by
conducting
a
substantially
32
equivalent
program,
event,
or
arrangement
under
a
different
33
name,
structure,
or
designation.
A
program,
event,
or
34
arrangement
is
substantially
equivalent
if
its
primary
purpose
35
-1-
LSB
6968YC
(6)
91
as/js
1/
5
H.F.
_____
or
practical
effect
is
to
allow
individuals
with
outstanding
1
arrest
warrants
to
appear
and
resolve
those
warrants
without
2
being
subject
to
immediate
arrest
and
custodial
processing.
3
Evidence
that
a
program
is
substantially
equivalent
includes
4
but
is
not
limited
to:
5
a.
Block-scheduling
or
clustering
warrant
cases
on
a
single
6
docket
day
with
an
explicit
or
implicit
understanding
that
7
attending
individuals
will
not
be
subject
to
immediate
arrest.
8
b.
Advertising
or
communicating
to
individuals
with
9
outstanding
warrants
that
they
may
appear
at
a
particular
time
10
and
place
to
resolve
warrants
without
risk
of
arrest.
11
c.
Coordinating
between
law
enforcement,
court
personnel,
12
attorneys,
or
community
organizations
to
facilitate
13
noncustodial
warrant
resolution
outside
of
standard
judicial
14
procedures.
15
6.
A
violation
of
this
section
is
subject
to
the
following
16
penalties:
17
a.
(1)
A
public
official
or
employee
who
knowingly
violates
18
this
section
commits
a
simple
misdemeanor.
19
(2)
In
addition
to
the
penalty
provided
in
subparagraph
20
(1),
a
public
official
or
employee
who
knowingly
violates
this
21
section
is
also
subject
to
removal
from
office
or
employment
22
pursuant
to
applicable
law.
23
b.
A
private
person
that
knowingly
organizes,
sponsors,
24
hosts,
or
funds
a
warrant
resolution
clinic
or
substantially
25
equivalent
program
in
violation
of
this
section
commits
a
26
simple
misdemeanor
and
is
also
subject
to
a
civil
penalty
of
27
not
more
than
ten
thousand
dollars
per
violation,
recoverable
28
by
the
attorney
general
in
an
action
in
district
court.
29
7.
Any
person
may
report
a
suspected
violation
of
this
30
section
to
the
office
of
the
attorney
general.
Upon
receipt
31
of
a
report
or
upon
the
attorney
general’s
own
initiative,
the
32
attorney
general
may
investigate
suspected
violations
and
may
33
bring
a
civil
enforcement
action
in
district
court
seeking
34
injunctive
relief,
civil
penalties
as
provided
in
subsection
35
-2-
LSB
6968YC
(6)
91
as/js
2/
5
H.F.
_____
6,
and
recovery
of
costs
and
reasonable
attorney
fees.
The
1
attorney
general
shall
establish
a
procedure
for
receiving
and
2
reviewing
reports
under
this
subsection
and
shall
make
such
3
procedure
publicly
available.
4
8.
Any
resident
of
a
county
in
which
a
warrant
resolution
5
clinic
or
substantially
equivalent
program
is
conducted
or
6
planned
in
violation
of
this
section
may
bring
a
civil
action
7
in
district
court
to
do
any
of
the
following:
8
a.
Obtain
injunctive
or
declaratory
relief
to
prevent
or
9
restrain
the
violation.
10
b.
Recover
actual
damages,
if
any.
11
c.
Recover
reasonable
attorney
fees
and
court
costs
if
the
12
plaintiff
substantially
prevails.
13
9.
In
addition
to
any
other
penalty,
any
county
organizing,
14
sponsoring,
hosting,
funding,
promoting,
or
participating
in
a
15
warrant
resolution
clinic
shall
not
receive
any
funds
having
16
their
origin
in
court
debt,
as
defined
in
section
602.8107,
17
including
but
not
limited
to
fees
or
remittances
arising
18
from
or
related
to
the
collection
of
past
due
fines
and
fees
19
constituting
court
debt.
20
10.
This
section
preempts
and
supersedes
any
ordinance,
21
resolution,
policy,
rule,
or
other
action
by
a
city,
county,
22
or
other
political
subdivision
of
this
state
that
authorizes,
23
permits,
funds,
or
facilitates
a
warrant
resolution
clinic
or
24
any
substantially
equivalent
program,
event,
or
arrangement
as
25
described
in
this
section.
No
political
subdivision
of
this
26
state
shall
enact
or
enforce
any
provision
that
conflicts
with
27
or
purports
to
authorize
conduct
prohibited
by
this
section.
28
Sec.
2.
EFFECTIVE
DATE.
This
Act,
being
deemed
of
immediate
29
importance,
takes
effect
upon
enactment.
30
EXPLANATION
31
The
inclusion
of
this
explanation
does
not
constitute
agreement
with
32
the
explanation’s
substance
by
the
members
of
the
general
assembly.
33
This
bill
prohibits
warrant
resolution
clinics
and
includes
34
enforcement
mechanisms.
35
-3-
LSB
6968YC
(6)
91
as/js
3/
5
H.F.
_____
The
bill
defines
“warrant
resolution
clinic”
as
any
1
prearranged
event,
program,
assembly,
arrangement,
docket
2
setting,
or
coordinated
effort,
whether
formal
or
informal,
3
other
than
a
regularly
scheduled
court
proceeding
held
within
4
a
courthouse
or
judicial
facility,
designed
or
having
the
5
practical
effect
of
allowing
individuals
with
outstanding
6
arrest
warrants
to
appear
and
resolve
such
warrants
without
7
being
subject
to
immediate
arrest
and
custodial
processing,
8
regardless
of
how
such
event,
program,
assembly,
arrangement,
9
docket
setting,
or
effort
is
designated
or
characterized.
10
The
bill
provides
that
an
entity,
organization,
county
11
attorney,
law
enforcement
agency,
judicial
officer,
nonprofit
12
organization,
or
any
other
person
shall
not
organize,
sponsor,
13
host,
fund,
promote,
or
participate
in
a
warrant
resolution
14
clinic.
A
person
who
has
an
outstanding
warrant
for
the
15
person’s
arrest
may
only
resolve
the
warrant
by
surrendering
16
to
a
peace
officer
or
at
a
law
enforcement
agency,
appearing
17
at
a
scheduled
court
hearing
as
directed
by
a
magistrate
or
18
judge
under
standard
judicial
procedures,
or
through
a
written
19
motion
filed
in
an
individual,
pending
case,
agreed
to
by
the
20
prosecuting
attorney,
and
ruled
on
by
the
court
under
standard
21
judicial
procedures
in
the
ordinary
course
of
the
case.
22
The
bill
prohibits
the
use
of
public
funds
or
facilities
for
23
the
purpose
of
hosting
a
warrant
resolution
clinic.
24
The
bill
provides
that
a
person
shall
not
evade
or
25
attempt
to
evade
the
prohibitions
of
the
bill
by
conducting
26
a
substantially
equivalent
program,
event,
or
arrangement
27
under
a
different
name,
structure,
or
designation.
The
bill
28
provides
examples
of
substantially
equivalent
programs
that
are
29
prohibited.
30
A
public
official
or
employee
who
knowingly
violates
the
31
bill
commits
a
simple
misdemeanor,
and
is
also
subject
to
32
removal
from
office
or
employment
pursuant
to
applicable
law.
33
A
private
person
that
knowingly
organizes,
sponsors,
hosts,
or
34
funds
a
warrant
resolution
clinic
or
substantially
equivalent
35
-4-
LSB
6968YC
(6)
91
as/js
4/
5
H.F.
_____
program
in
violation
of
the
bill
commits
a
simple
misdemeanor
1
and
is
also
subject
to
a
civil
penalty
of
not
more
than
$10,000
2
per
violation,
recoverable
by
the
attorney
general
in
an
action
3
in
district
court.
A
simple
misdemeanor
is
punishable
by
4
confinement
for
no
more
than
30
days
and
a
fine
of
at
least
$105
5
but
not
more
than
$855.
6
The
bill
provides
that
any
person
may
report
a
suspected
7
violation
of
the
bill
to
the
office
of
the
attorney
general.
8
The
attorney
general
may
investigate
suspected
violations
and
9
may
bring
a
civil
enforcement
action
in
district
court
seeking
10
injunctive
relief,
civil
penalties,
and
recovery
of
costs
and
11
reasonable
attorney
fees.
12
The
bill
provides
that
any
resident
of
a
county
in
which
13
a
warrant
resolution
clinic
or
substantially
equivalent
14
program
is
conducted
or
planned
in
violation
of
the
bill
may
15
bring
a
civil
action
in
district
court
to
obtain
injunctive
16
or
declaratory
relief
to
prevent
or
restrain
the
violation,
17
recover
actual
damages,
and
recover
reasonable
attorney
fees
18
and
court
costs.
19
The
bill
provides
that
any
county
organizing,
sponsoring,
20
hosting,
funding,
promoting,
or
participating
in
a
warrant
21
resolution
clinic
is
not
entitled
to
receive
any
funds
having
22
their
origin
in
court
debt
including
but
not
limited
to
fees
or
23
remittances
arising
from
or
related
to
the
collection
of
past
24
due
fines
and
fees
constituting
court
debt.
25
The
bill
takes
effect
upon
enactment.
26
-5-
LSB
6968YC
(6)
91
as/js
5/
5