House
Study
Bill
667
-
Introduced
SENATE/HOUSE
FILE
_____
BY
(PROPOSED
ATTORNEY
GENERAL
BILL)
A
BILL
FOR
An
Act
relating
to
actions
regarding
the
economic
interest
1
of
enterprise
shareholders
and
participants
in
and
2
beneficiaries
of
public
pension
benefit
plans,
and
providing
3
penalties.
4
BE
IT
ENACTED
BY
THE
GENERAL
ASSEMBLY
OF
THE
STATE
OF
IOWA:
5
TLSB
5408XD
(4)
90
sc/ns
S.F.
_____
H.F.
_____
Section
1.
NEW
SECTION
.
12L.1
Definitions.
1
For
purposes
of
this
chapter:
2
1.
“Best
economic
interest”
means
investment
pursuant
to
the
3
objective
of
maximizing
risk-adjusted
investment
returns
of
the
4
participants
and
beneficiaries
of
a
plan
over
a
time
horizon
5
consistent
with
the
risk
management
profile
of
the
plan.
6
2.
“Consumer”
means
a
person
who
is
a
resident
of
this
state
7
and
to
which
any
of
the
following
apply:
8
a.
The
person
has
an
interest
in
an
investment
company,
9
including
but
not
limited
to
mutual
funds
and
exchange-traded
10
funds,
registered
with
the
federal
securities
and
exchange
11
commission
that
directly
or
indirectly
owns
shares
of
an
12
enterprise
regulated
by
the
state.
13
b.
The
person
is
a
beneficiary
or
participant
in
a
plan.
14
3.
“Economic
analysis”
means
a
written
analysis
15
demonstrating
the
factors
considered
in
evaluating
the
economic
16
impact
of
a
shareholder-sponsored
proposal.
At
a
minimum,
the
17
analysis
must
address
all
of
the
following
factors:
18
a.
The
subject
matter
of
the
shareholder-sponsored
proposal.
19
b.
An
evaluation
of
the
investment
company’s
stated
reasons
20
for
opposition
to
the
shareholder-sponsored
proposal.
21
c.
An
evaluation
of
whether
the
shareholder-sponsored
22
proposal
reflects
the
investment
objectives
and
risk
management
23
profile
of
the
plan
in
which
the
participants
and
beneficiaries
24
are
invested.
25
d.
An
evaluation
of
the
economic
benefits
and
costs
of
26
implementing
the
proposal,
as
written,
over
a
time
horizon
that
27
reflects
the
investment
objectives
and
risk
management
profile
28
of
the
plan.
29
e.
The
quantifiable
impact
of
the
shareholder-sponsored
30
proposal,
as
written,
on
the
investment
returns
of
the
31
participants
and
beneficiaries
of
the
plan.
32
f.
An
explanation
of
modeling,
procedures,
or
processes
used
33
to
complete
the
economic
analysis.
34
4.
“Fiduciary”
means
a
person
who,
with
respect
to
a
pension
35
-1-
LSB
5408XD
(4)
90
sc/ns
1/
9
S.F.
_____
H.F.
_____
benefit
plan,
does
any
of
the
following:
1
a.
Exercises
discretionary
authority
or
discretionary
2
control
with
respect
to
management
of
the
plan
or
exercises
3
authority
or
control
with
respect
to
acquisition,
management,
4
or
disposition
of
the
plan’s
assets.
5
b.
Renders
investment
advice
for
a
fee
or
other
6
compensation,
direct
or
indirect,
with
respect
to
moneys
or
7
other
assets
of
the
plan
or
has
authority
or
responsibility
to
8
do
so.
9
c.
Has
discretionary
authority
or
discretionary
10
responsibility
in
the
administration
of
the
plan.
11
5.
“Investment
company”
means
the
same
as
defined
in
15
12
U.S.C.
§80a-3.
13
6.
“Pension
benefit
plan”
or
“plan”
means
a
plan,
fund,
or
14
program
established,
maintained,
or
offered
by
a
public
entity,
15
including
but
not
limited
to
a
public
retirement
system
as
16
defined
in
section
97D.5,
if
by
its
terms
or
as
a
result
of
17
surrounding
circumstances
the
plan,
fund,
or
program
does
any
18
of
the
following:
19
a.
Provides
retirement
income
or
other
retirement
benefits
20
to
employees
or
former
employees.
21
b.
Results
in
a
deferral
of
income
by
employees
for
a
period
22
extending
to
the
termination
of
covered
employment
or
beyond.
23
7.
“Proxy
advisory
firm”
means
a
person
who
is
engaged
24
in
the
business
of
providing
proxy
voting
advice,
research,
25
analysis,
ratings,
or
recommendations
to
a
fiduciary,
26
shareholder,
or
investor,
including
institutional
investors.
27
8.
“Public
entity”
means
the
state
or
a
political
28
subdivision
of
the
state,
including
any
agency,
authority,
29
department,
enterprise,
instrumentality,
school,
college,
30
university,
or
other
subunit
operated
by
the
state
or
a
31
political
subdivision
of
the
state.
32
9.
“Shareholder-sponsored
proposal”
means
a
proposal
33
submitted
to
an
issuer
of
securities
by
a
shareholder
under
17
34
C.F.R.
§240.14a-8.
35
-2-
LSB
5408XD
(4)
90
sc/ns
2/
9
S.F.
_____
H.F.
_____
Sec.
2.
NEW
SECTION
.
12L.2
Fiduciary
voting
1
responsibilities.
2
1.
A
fiduciary
shall
vote
all
shares
held
directly
or
3
indirectly
by,
subject
to,
or
on
behalf
of
a
plan
for
the
4
benefit
of
the
plan’s
participants
and
beneficiaries
solely
5
in
the
best
economic
interest
of
the
plan
participants
and
6
beneficiaries.
7
2.
For
purposes
of
this
section,
with
respect
to
a
8
shareholder-sponsored
proposal,
there
is
a
rebuttable
9
presumption
that
a
fiduciary
votes
its
shares
solely
10
in
the
best
economic
interest
of
the
plan
participants
11
and
beneficiaries
if
the
fiduciary’s
vote
follows
the
12
recommendation
of
the
board
of
directors
of
the
issuer
of
13
the
shares,
as
long
as
such
board
includes
a
majority
of
14
independent
directors.
15
3.
With
respect
to
a
shareholder-sponsored
proposal,
16
a
fiduciary’s
vote
in
a
manner
inconsistent
with
the
17
recommendation
of
the
board
of
directors
of
the
issuer
of
the
18
shares
is
presumed
to
be
in
the
best
economic
interest
of
the
19
plan
participants
and
beneficiaries
if
any
of
the
following
20
criteria
are
met:
21
a.
The
fiduciary
conducts
and
documents
an
economic
analysis
22
demonstrating
that
such
a
vote
is
in
the
best
economic
interest
23
of
the
plan
participants
and
beneficiaries.
24
b.
On
behalf
of
the
fiduciary,
a
third
party
conducts
and
25
documents
an
economic
analysis
demonstrating
that
such
a
vote
26
is
in
the
best
economic
interest
of
the
plan
participants
27
and
beneficiaries,
and
the
fiduciary
determines
that
the
28
economic
analysis
adequately
demonstrates
that
such
a
vote
is
29
in
the
best
economic
interest
of
the
plan
participants
and
30
beneficiaries.
31
4.
A
fiduciary
shall
not
vote
in
a
manner
that
does
any
of
32
the
following:
33
a.
Subordinates
the
economic
interest
of
the
plan’s
34
participants
and
beneficiaries
to
any
environmental,
social,
35
-3-
LSB
5408XD
(4)
90
sc/ns
3/
9
S.F.
_____
H.F.
_____
policy,
governance,
or
ideological
goal.
1
b.
Promotes
any
environmental,
social,
policy,
governance,
2
or
ideological
goal,
unless,
based
on
an
economic
analysis,
it
3
is
determined
that
the
vote
is
in
the
best
economic
interest
of
4
the
plan
participants
and
beneficiaries.
5
5.
With
respect
to
shareholder-sponsored
proposals,
a
6
fiduciary
shall
annually
disclose
in
a
report
to
the
treasurer
7
of
state
all
of
the
following:
8
a.
Each
vote
that
was
inconsistent
with
the
recommendation
9
of
an
issuer’s
board
of
directors
composed
of
a
majority
of
10
independent
directors.
11
b.
The
economic
analysis
conducted
and
documented
with
12
respect
to
each
vote
described
in
subsection
3
to
determine
13
that
the
vote
was
in
the
best
economic
interest
of
the
plan’s
14
participants
and
beneficiaries.
15
6.
The
report
required
under
subsection
5
must
be
certified
16
by
the
chief
executive
officer
and
chief
financial
officer,
or
17
an
individual
acting
in
each
capacity,
of
the
fiduciary.
18
7.
At
least
once
every
three
years,
a
fiduciary
shall
19
back
test
its
economic
analysis
to
ensure
that
the
models,
20
procedures,
and
processes
it
uses
predict
the
best
economic
21
interest
of
the
plan’s
participants
and
beneficiaries,
and
22
shall
deliver
a
report
detailing
such
back
testing
to
the
23
treasurer
of
state.
Based
on
such
back
testing,
the
chief
24
executive
officer
and
chief
financial
officer,
or
an
individual
25
acting
in
each
capacity,
of
the
fiduciary
shall
certify
that
26
the
economic
analysis
performed
by
the
fiduciary
and
included
27
in
the
report
is
effective.
28
8.
The
court
may
award
court
costs
and
reasonable
attorney
29
fees
to
a
party
who
prevails
in
an
action
brought
under
this
30
section.
31
Sec.
3.
NEW
SECTION
.
12L.3
Proxy
advisory
firms.
32
1.
A
proxy
advisory
firm
shall
not
provide
proxy
voting
33
advice
with
respect
to
shareholder-sponsored
proposals
34
submitted
to
any
enterprise
that
the
state
regulates,
unless
35
-4-
LSB
5408XD
(4)
90
sc/ns
4/
9
S.F.
_____
H.F.
_____
the
proxy
advisory
firm
bases
its
voting
recommendations
1
solely
on
the
best
economic
interests
of
the
enterprise’s
2
shareholders.
3
2.
For
purposes
of
this
section,
with
respect
to
a
4
shareholder-sponsored
proposal
submitted
to
an
enterprise
5
regulated
by
the
state,
there
is
a
presumption
that
a
proxy
6
advisory
firm’s
voting
recommendation
is
based
solely
on
the
7
best
economic
interest
of
the
enterprise’s
shareholders
if
8
the
recommendation
follows
the
recommendation
of
the
board
of
9
directors
of
the
issuer
of
the
shares,
as
long
as
the
board
10
includes
a
majority
of
independent
directors.
11
3.
With
respect
to
a
shareholder-sponsored
proposal
12
submitted
to
an
enterprise
regulated
by
the
state,
a
proxy
13
advisory
firm
may
recommend
a
vote
that
is
inconsistent
with
14
the
recommendation
of
the
board
of
directors
of
the
issuer
of
15
the
shares
if
the
proxy
advisory
firm
conducts
and
documents
an
16
economic
analysis
demonstrating
that
such
a
vote
is
in
the
best
17
economic
interest
of
the
enterprise’s
shareholders.
18
4.
With
respect
to
shareholder-sponsored
proposals
19
submitted
to
an
enterprise
regulated
by
the
state,
a
proxy
20
advisory
firm
shall
annually
disclose
in
a
report
to
the
21
treasurer
of
state
all
of
the
following:
22
a.
Each
vote
recommendation
that
was
inconsistent
with
the
23
recommendation
of
an
issuer’s
board
of
directors
composed
of
a
24
majority
of
independent
directors.
25
b.
The
economic
analysis
conducted
and
documented
with
26
respect
to
each
vote
recommendation
described
in
subsection
27
3
to
determine
that
the
vote
recommendation
was
in
the
best
28
economic
interest
of
the
regulated
enterprise’s
shareholders.
29
Sec.
4.
NEW
SECTION
.
12L.4
Consumer
right
to
disclosure.
30
1.
a.
If
a
consumer
has
reason
to
believe
that
the
31
requirements
of
section
12L.2
or
12L.3
have
not
been
met,
a
32
consumer
may
submit
a
request
to
any
of
the
following
to
obtain
33
a
copy
of
the
documented
economic
analysis
demonstrating
that
34
such
a
vote
is
solely
in
the
best
economic
interest
of
the
35
-5-
LSB
5408XD
(4)
90
sc/ns
5/
9
S.F.
_____
H.F.
_____
consumer:
1
(1)
The
investment
company
that
owns
shares
of
an
enterprise
2
regulated
by
the
state.
3
(2)
The
plan,
in
each
case,
in
which
the
consumer
is
an
4
investor,
beneficiary,
or
participant.
5
b.
There
is
a
presumption
that
a
vote
is
solely
in
the
6
best
economic
interest
of
the
consumer
if
the
vote
follows
the
7
recommendation
of
the
board
of
directors
of
the
issuer
of
the
8
shares,
as
long
as
the
board
includes
a
majority
of
independent
9
directors.
10
2.
a.
The
investment
company
or
plan
shall
respond
in
11
writing
to
the
consumer
within
ninety
days
of
receipt
of
12
a
request
described
in
subsection
1
by
doing
one
of
the
13
following:
14
(1)
Providing
the
consumer
with
the
requested
economic
15
analysis.
16
(2)
Informing
the
consumer
that
no
economic
analysis
is
17
available,
if
the
investment
company
did
not
conduct
and
18
document
an
economic
analysis.
19
(3)
Informing
the
consumer
that
the
vote
at
issue
was
20
consistent
with
the
recommendation
of
the
board
of
directors
21
of
the
issuer
of
the
shares
and
such
board
is
composed
of
a
22
majority
of
independent
directors.
23
b.
The
investment
company
or
plan
shall
provide
information
24
in
response
to
a
consumer
request
at
no
cost
up
to
twice
25
annually
per
consumer.
26
Sec.
5.
NEW
SECTION
.
12L.5
Enforcement.
27
1.
This
chapter
may
be
enforced
by
the
attorney
general.
28
2.
If
the
attorney
general
has
reasonable
cause
to
believe
29
that
a
person
has
engaged
in,
is
engaging
in,
or
is
about
to
30
engage
in
a
violation
of
this
chapter,
the
attorney
general
may
31
do
any
of
the
following:
32
a.
Require
the
person
to
file
on
forms
prescribed
by
the
33
attorney
general
a
statement
or
report
in
writing,
under
oath,
34
as
to
all
the
circumstances
surrounding
the
violation
and
35
-6-
LSB
5408XD
(4)
90
sc/ns
6/
9
S.F.
_____
H.F.
_____
such
other
data
and
information
as
the
attorney
general
deems
1
necessary.
2
b.
Examine
under
oath
any
person
in
connection
with
the
3
violation.
4
c.
Examine
any
record,
book,
document,
account,
or
paper
as
5
the
attorney
general
deems
necessary.
6
d.
Issue
civil
investigatory
demands
consistent
with
7
investigation
into
a
potential
enforcement
action.
8
e.
Under
an
order
of
the
district
court,
impound
any
record,
9
book,
document,
account,
paper,
or
sample
or
material
relating
10
to
the
violation
and
retain
the
same
in
the
attorney
general’s
11
possession
until
the
completion
of
all
proceedings
undertaken
12
under
this
chapter
or
in
court.
13
3.
The
attorney
general
may
initiate
an
action
in
the
14
name
of
the
state
and
may
seek
an
injunction
to
restrain
15
any
violations
of
this
chapter.
A
violation
of
this
chapter
16
shall
constitute
irreparable
harm.
Each
share
voted
by
a
17
fiduciary
that
is
not
voted
in
the
best
economic
interest
of
18
the
shareholder
constitutes
a
separate
violation.
The
attorney
19
general
may
also
seek
civil
penalties
for
each
violation
under
20
this
chapter.
All
civil
penalties
issued
shall
be
in
equity.
21
Civil
penalties
shall
not
exceed
one
thousand
dollars
per
22
violation.
Civil
penalties
collected
under
this
chapter
shall
23
be
deposited
in
the
general
fund
of
the
state.
24
EXPLANATION
25
The
inclusion
of
this
explanation
does
not
constitute
agreement
with
26
the
explanation’s
substance
by
the
members
of
the
general
assembly.
27
This
bill
requires
a
fiduciary
to
vote
all
shares
of
a
28
pension
benefit
plan
established,
maintained,
or
offered
by
29
a
public
entity
solely
in
the
best
economic
interest
of
the
30
plan
participants
and
beneficiaries.
The
bill
creates
the
31
rebuttable
presumption
that,
if
a
fiduciary’s
vote
aligns
with
32
the
recommendation
of
the
board
of
directors
of
the
issuer
33
of
the
shares
or
if
the
fiduciary
or
a
third
party
conducts
34
and
documents
an
economic
analysis
showing
that
the
vote
is
35
-7-
LSB
5408XD
(4)
90
sc/ns
7/
9
S.F.
_____
H.F.
_____
in
the
best
economic
interest
of
the
plan
participants
and
1
beneficiaries,
the
vote
is
in
the
best
interest
of
the
plan
2
participants
and
beneficiaries.
The
bill
prohibits
a
fiduciary
3
from
voting
shares
of
a
plan
based
on
any
environmental,
4
social,
policy,
governance,
or
ideological
goal
that
is
5
not
in
the
best
economic
interest
of
plan
participants
and
6
beneficiaries.
7
The
bill
requires
a
fiduciary
to
annually
report
to
8
the
treasurer
of
state
any
vote
inconsistent
with
the
9
recommendation
of
an
issuer’s
board
of
directors
and
the
10
economic
analysis
on
which
the
fiduciary
relied.
This
report
11
must
be
certified
by
the
fiduciary’s
chief
executive
officer
12
and
chief
financial
officer.
13
The
bill
also
requires
a
fiduciary
to
review
its
economic
14
analysis
every
three
years
to
ensure
that
the
fiduciary’s
15
models,
procedures,
and
processes
predict
the
best
economic
16
interest
of
the
plan
participants
and
beneficiaries.
17
The
bill
permits
a
court
to
award
court
costs
and
reasonable
18
attorney
fees
to
the
prevailing
party
in
a
suit
concerning
19
fiduciary
voting
responsibilities.
20
The
bill
prohibits
a
proxy
advisory
firm
from
providing
21
proxy
voting
advice
regarding
shareholder-sponsored
proposals
22
to
an
entity
that
the
state
regulates
unless
the
advice
is
23
based
solely
on
the
best
economic
interests
of
the
enterprise’s
24
shareholders.
If
a
proxy
advisory
firm’s
advice
follows
the
25
recommendation
of
the
board
of
directors
of
the
issuer
of
the
26
shares
or
if
the
proxy
advisory
firm
conducts
and
documents
an
27
economic
analysis
demonstrating
that
the
vote
is
in
the
best
28
economic
interest
of
the
plan
participants
and
beneficiaries,
29
then
the
advice
is
presumed
to
be
based
solely
on
the
best
30
economic
interest
of
the
enterprise’s
shareholders.
A
proxy
31
advisory
firm
must
submit
an
annual
report
to
the
treasurer
of
32
state
disclosing
any
vote
inconsistent
with
the
issuer’s
board
33
of
directors’
recommendations
and
the
economic
analysis
on
34
which
the
proxy
advisory
firm
relied.
35
-8-
LSB
5408XD
(4)
90
sc/ns
8/
9
S.F.
_____
H.F.
_____
The
bill
permits
an
investor,
beneficiary,
or
participant
of
1
a
plan
to
submit
a
request
for
the
economic
analysis
conducted
2
for
a
fiduciary’s
vote
to
the
investment
company
that
owns
3
shares
of
an
enterprise
regulated
by
the
state
or
the
plan
if
4
the
individual
has
reason
to
believe
that
shares
of
the
plan
5
have
not
been
voted
in
the
best
economic
interest
of
the
plan
6
participants
and
beneficiaries.
The
investment
company
or
7
plan
must
respond
in
writing
within
90
days
by
providing
the
8
requested
economic
analysis
or
informing
the
individual
that
no
9
economic
analysis
was
conducted
or
the
vote
aligned
with
the
10
recommendation
of
the
board
of
directors
of
the
issuer
of
the
11
shares.
The
investment
company
or
plan
must
provide
such
a
12
response
without
cost
up
to
twice
annually
per
consumer.
13
The
bill
allows
the
attorney
general
to
investigate
any
14
suspected
violations
of
the
bill
and
to
enforce
the
bill’s
15
provisions
by
initiating
an
action
in
the
name
of
the
state
16
and
seeking
civil
penalties
for
each
violation.
Each
share
17
not
voted
in
the
best
economic
interest
of
the
shareholder
18
qualifies
as
a
separate
violation
and
constitutes
irreparable
19
harm.
The
bill
requires
civil
penalties
to
be
in
equity
and
20
to
not
exceed
$1,000
per
violation.
Civil
penalties
collected
21
under
the
bill
are
deposited
in
the
general
fund
of
the
state.
22
-9-
LSB
5408XD
(4)
90
sc/ns
9/
9