Senate
File
2354
-
Introduced
SENATE
FILE
2354
BY
COMMITTEE
ON
LABOR
AND
BUSINESS
RELATIONS
(SUCCESSOR
TO
SF
2110)
A
BILL
FOR
An
Act
concerning
disqualification
from
eligibility
for
1
unemployment
benefits
due
to
discharge
for
misconduct.
2
BE
IT
ENACTED
BY
THE
GENERAL
ASSEMBLY
OF
THE
STATE
OF
IOWA:
3
TLSB
5018SV
(3)
87
je/rj
S.F.
2354
Section
1.
Section
96.5,
subsection
2,
Code
2018,
is
amended
1
by
adding
the
following
new
paragraph:
2
NEW
PARAGRAPH
.
0b.
Misconduct
is
deemed
to
have
occurred
3
in
circumstances
including
but
not
limited
to
any
of
the
4
following:
5
(1)
Falsification
by
the
individual
of
an
employment
6
application
or
any
other
documentation
provided
to
the
employer
7
in
order
to
obtain
employment
through
subterfuge.
8
(2)
Failure
by
the
individual
to
maintain
any
license,
9
registration,
or
certification
that
is
reasonably
required
10
by
the
employer,
or
that
is
required
by
law,
to
perform
the
11
individual’s
regular
job
duties,
unless
the
failure
is
not
12
within
the
control
of
the
individual.
13
(3)
Disregard
by
the
individual
of
the
employer’s
14
interests,
of
the
individual’s
duties
or
obligations
to
the
15
employer,
or
of
the
individual’s
duties
or
obligations
under
16
the
employer’s
employment
policies.
17
(4)
Damage
by
the
individual
of
the
employer’s
property
18
through
conduct
that
is
grossly
negligent.
19
(5)
Refusal
by
the
individual
to
obey
an
employer’s
20
reasonable
and
lawful
instruction,
unless
the
refusal
is
due
to
21
the
lack
of
ability,
skills,
or
training
of
the
individual
or
22
the
instruction
would
require
an
unsafe
act.
23
(6)
Consumption
by
the
individual
of
alcohol
or
illegal
24
or
nonprescribed
prescription
drugs,
or
use
by
the
individual
25
of
an
impairing
substance
in
an
off-label
manner,
on
the
26
employer’s
premises
during
working
hours
in
violation
of
the
27
employer’s
employment
policies.
28
(7)
Reporting
to
work
under
the
influence
of
alcohol,
29
illegal
or
nonprescribed
prescription
drugs,
or
an
impairing
30
substance
used
in
an
off-label
manner,
in
violation
of
31
the
employer’s
employment
policies,
unless
the
individual
32
is
compelled
to
report
to
work
by
the
employer
outside
of
33
scheduled
or
on-call
working
hours
and
informs
the
employer
34
prior
to
or
upon
arrival
at
the
workplace
that
the
individual
35
-1-
LSB
5018SV
(3)
87
je/rj
1/
4
S.F.
2354
is
under
the
influence
of
alcohol,
illegal
or
nonprescribed
1
prescription
drugs,
or
an
impairing
substance
used
in
an
2
off-label
manner
in
violation
of
the
employer’s
employment
3
policies.
4
(8)
Grossly
negligent
conduct
by
the
individual
that
5
endangers
the
safety
of
the
individual,
coworkers,
or
the
6
general
public.
7
(9)
Conduct
by
the
individual
that
is
defamatory
toward
the
8
employer
or
an
employee
of
the
employer
if
such
conduct
is
not
9
protected
under
federal
or
state
law.
10
Sec.
2.
Section
96.6,
subsection
2,
Code
2018,
is
amended
11
to
read
as
follows:
12
2.
Initial
determination.
A
representative
designated
by
13
the
director
shall
promptly
notify
all
interested
parties
to
14
the
claim
of
its
filing,
and
the
parties
have
ten
days
from
15
the
date
of
mailing
the
notice
of
the
filing
of
the
claim
by
16
ordinary
mail
to
the
last
known
address
to
protest
payment
of
17
benefits
to
the
claimant.
The
representative
shall
promptly
18
examine
the
claim
and
any
protest,
take
the
initiative
to
19
ascertain
relevant
information
concerning
the
claim,
and,
on
20
the
basis
of
the
facts
found
by
the
representative,
shall
21
determine
whether
or
not
the
claim
is
valid,
the
week
with
22
respect
to
which
benefits
shall
commence,
the
weekly
benefit
23
amount
payable
and
its
maximum
duration,
and
whether
any
24
disqualification
shall
be
imposed.
The
claimant
has
the
burden
25
of
proving
that
the
claimant
meets
the
basic
eligibility
26
conditions
of
section
96.4
.
The
employer
has
the
burden
of
27
proving
that
the
claimant
is
disqualified
for
benefits
pursuant
28
to
section
96.5
,
except
as
provided
by
this
subsection
.
The
29
claimant
has
the
initial
burden
to
produce
evidence
showing
30
that
the
claimant
is
not
disqualified
for
benefits
in
cases
31
involving
section
96.5,
subsections
10
and
11
,
and
has
the
32
burden
of
proving
that
a
voluntary
quit
pursuant
to
section
33
96.5,
subsection
1
,
was
for
good
cause
attributable
to
the
34
employer
and
that
the
claimant
is
not
disqualified
for
benefits
35
-2-
LSB
5018SV
(3)
87
je/rj
2/
4
S.F.
2354
in
cases
involving
section
96.5,
subsection
1
,
paragraphs
1
“a”
through
“h”
.
When
making
a
determination
as
to
whether
2
a
claimant
is
disqualified
for
benefits
pursuant
to
section
3
96.5,
subsection
2,
the
representative
shall
not
consider
4
whether,
to
what
extent,
or
in
what
manner
an
employer
imposed
5
disciplinary
action
upon
the
claimant
for
any
past
misconduct
6
by
the
claimant.
Unless
the
claimant
or
other
interested
7
party,
after
notification
or
within
ten
calendar
days
after
8
notification
was
mailed
to
the
claimant’s
last
known
address,
9
files
an
appeal
from
the
decision,
the
decision
is
final
10
and
benefits
shall
be
paid
or
denied
in
accordance
with
the
11
decision.
If
an
administrative
law
judge
affirms
a
decision
of
12
the
representative,
or
the
appeal
board
affirms
a
decision
of
13
the
administrative
law
judge
allowing
benefits,
the
benefits
14
shall
be
paid
regardless
of
any
appeal
which
is
thereafter
15
taken,
but
if
the
decision
is
finally
reversed,
no
employer’s
16
account
shall
be
charged
with
benefits
so
paid
and
this
relief
17
from
charges
shall
apply
to
both
contributory
and
reimbursable
18
employers,
notwithstanding
section
96.8,
subsection
5
.
19
Sec.
3.
CONFLICTING
DECISIONS
VOID.
A
decision
or
ruling
20
by
the
department
of
workforce
development
or
a
court,
or
any
21
portion
thereof,
pertaining
to
misconduct
pursuant
to
section
22
96.5,
subsection
2,
occurring
on
or
after
the
effective
date
23
of
this
Act,
is
void
to
the
extent
such
decision
or
ruling
24
conflicts
with
section
96.5,
subsection
2,
paragraph
“0b”,
as
25
enacted
in
this
Act.
26
EXPLANATION
27
The
inclusion
of
this
explanation
does
not
constitute
agreement
with
28
the
explanation’s
substance
by
the
members
of
the
general
assembly.
29
Under
current
law,
an
individual
is
disqualified
from
30
eligibility
for
unemployment
benefits
if
the
department
of
31
workforce
development
finds
that
the
individual
has
been
32
discharged
for
misconduct
in
connection
with
the
individual’s
33
employment.
“Misconduct”
is
defined
by
the
department
by
rule.
34
This
bill
provides
that
misconduct
is
deemed
to
have
35
-3-
LSB
5018SV
(3)
87
je/rj
3/
4
S.F.
2354
occurred
in
circumstances
including
but
not
limited
to
certain
1
circumstances
specified
in
the
bill,
some
of
which
include
2
falsification
of
an
employment
application
or
any
other
3
documentation
provided
to
the
employer
in
order
to
obtain
4
employment
through
subterfuge;
failure
to
maintain
any
required
5
license,
registration,
or
certification;
and
damage
by
the
6
individual
of
the
employer’s
property
through
conduct
that
is
7
grossly
negligent.
8
The
bill
also
prohibits
the
department
from
considering
9
whether,
to
what
extent,
or
in
what
manner
an
employer
imposed
10
disciplinary
action
upon
an
individual
for
any
past
misconduct
11
by
the
individual
when
making
a
determination
as
to
whether
the
12
individual
is
disqualified
for
benefits
due
to
being
discharged
13
for
misconduct.
14
-4-
LSB
5018SV
(3)
87
je/rj
4/
4