House
File
2413
-
Introduced
HOUSE
FILE
2413
BY
COMMITTEE
ON
EDUCATION
(SUCCESSOR
TO
HF
2229)
A
BILL
FOR
An
Act
relating
to
reading
proficiency
assessments
and
1
intensive
summer
reading
programs
administered
and
provided
2
by
school
districts.
3
BE
IT
ENACTED
BY
THE
GENERAL
ASSEMBLY
OF
THE
STATE
OF
IOWA:
4
TLSB
5479HV
(1)
86
kh/rj
H.F.
2413
Section
1.
Section
256.7,
subsection
31,
paragraph
a,
Code
1
2016,
is
amended
to
read
as
follows:
2
a.
By
July
1,
2013,
adopt
Adopt
by
rule
guidelines
for
3
school
district
implementation
of
section
279.68
,
including
4
but
not
limited
to
basic
levels
of
reading
proficiency
on
5
approved
locally
determined
or
statewide
assessments
and
6
identification
of
tools
that
school
districts
may
use
in
7
evaluating
and
reevaluating
any
student
who
may
not
be
or
who
8
is
determined
not
to
be
deficient
reading
proficiently
and
is
9
persistently
at
risk
in
reading,
including
but
not
limited
to
10
initial
assessments
and
subsequent
assessments,
alternative
11
assessments,
and
portfolio
reviews.
The
state
board
shall
12
adopt
standards
that
provide
a
reasonable
expectation
that
a
13
student’s
progress
toward
reading
proficiency
under
section
14
279.68
is
sufficient
to
master
appropriate
grade
four
level
15
reading
skills
prior
to
the
student’s
promotion
to
grade
four.
16
Sec.
2.
Section
279.68,
Code
2016,
is
amended
to
read
as
17
follows:
18
279.68
Student
progression
——
remedial
intensive
reading
19
instruction
——
reporting
requirements
——
promotion.
20
1.
Reading
deficiency
and
proficiency,
assessments,
parental
21
notification
,
and
promotion
.
22
a.
A
school
district
shall
assess
all
students
enrolled
23
in
kindergarten
through
grade
three
at
the
beginning
of
each
24
school
year
for
their
level
of
reading
or
reading
readiness
on
25
locally
determined
or
statewide
assessments,
as
provided
in
26
section
256.7,
subsection
31
.
A
If
a
student
is
not
reading
27
proficiently
and
is
persistently
at
risk
in
reading,
based
28
upon
the
assessments
administered
in
accordance
with
this
29
paragraph,
the
school
district
shall
provide
intensive
reading
30
instruction
to
any
the
student
who
exhibits
a
substantial
31
deficiency
in
reading,
based
upon
the
assessment
or
through
32
teacher
observations
.
The
student’s
reading
proficiency
shall
33
be
periodically
reassessed
by
locally
determined
or
statewide
34
assessments
including
periodic
universal
screening
and
annual
35
-1-
LSB
5479HV
(1)
86
kh/rj
1/
9
H.F.
2413
standard-based
assessments
.
The
student
shall
continue
to
be
1
provided
with
intensive
reading
instruction
until
the
student
2
is
reading
deficiency
is
remedied
at
grade
level,
as
determined
3
by
the
student’s
consistently
proficient
performance
on
valid
4
and
reliable
measures
of
reading
ability
.
For
purposes
of
5
this
section,
“persistently
at
risk”
means
the
student
has
not
6
met
the
grade-level
benchmark
on
two
consecutive
screening
7
assessments
administered
under
this
paragraph.
8
b.
The
parent
or
guardian
of
any
student
in
kindergarten
9
through
grade
three
who
exhibits
a
substantial
deficiency
in
10
is
persistently
at
risk
in
reading
,
as
described
in
paragraph
11
“a”
,
shall
be
notified
at
least
annually
in
writing
and
shall
be
12
provided
all
of
the
following:
13
(1)
That
the
child
has
been
identified
as
having
a
14
substantial
deficiency
in
reading.
15
(2)
(1)
A
description
of
the
services
currently
provided
to
16
the
child
student
.
17
(3)
(2)
A
description
of
the
proposed
supplemental
18
instructional
services
and
supports
that
the
school
district
19
will
provide
to
the
child
student
that
are
designed
to
20
remediate
the
identified
area
of
areas
in
which
the
student
is
21
persistently
at
risk
in
reading
deficiency
.
22
(4)
(3)
Strategies
for
parents
and
guardians
to
use
in
23
helping
the
child
succeed
in
reading
proficiency
student
read
24
proficiently
,
including
but
not
limited
to
the
promotion
of
25
parent-guided
home
reading.
26
(4)
Regular
updates
regarding
the
student’s
progress
27
toward
reaching
or
exceeding
the
targeted
level
of
reading
28
proficiency.
29
c.
Beginning
May
1,
2017,
unless
the
school
district
is
30
granted
a
waiver
pursuant
to
subsection
2
,
paragraph
“e”
,
if
the
31
student’s
student
is
persistently
at
risk
in
reading
deficiency
32
is
not
remedied
by
the
end
of
grade
three,
as
demonstrated
by
33
scoring
on
a
locally
determined
or
statewide
assessment
as
34
provided
in
section
256.7,
subsection
31
,
the
school
district
35
-2-
LSB
5479HV
(1)
86
kh/rj
2/
9
H.F.
2413
shall
notify
the
student’s
parent
or
guardian
that
the
parent
1
or
guardian
may
enroll
the
student
in
an
intensive
summer
2
reading
program
offered
in
accordance
with
subsection
2
,
3
paragraph
“e”
.
If
the
parent
or
guardian
does
not
enroll
the
4
student
in
the
intensive
summer
reading
program
and
the
student
5
is
ineligible
for
the
good
cause
exemption
under
subsection
6
5
,
the
student
shall
be
retained
in
grade
three
pursuant
to
7
subsection
3
.
If
the
student
is
exempt
from
participating
in
8
an
intensive
summer
reading
program
for
good
cause,
pursuant
9
to
subsection
5
,
or
completes
the
intensive
summer
reading
10
program
but
is
not
reading
proficient
proficiently
upon
11
completion
of
the
program,
the
student
may
be
promoted
to
grade
12
four,
but
the
school
district
shall
continue
to
provide
the
13
student
with
intensive
reading
instruction
until
the
student
is
14
proficient
in
reading
proficiently
as
demonstrated
by
scoring
15
on
locally
determined
or
statewide
assessments
administered
16
under
paragraph
“a”
.
17
2.
Successful
progression
for
early
readers.
If
funds
18
are
appropriated
by
the
general
assembly
for
purposes
of
19
implementing
this
subsection
,
a
school
district
shall
do
all
20
of
the
following:
21
a.
Provide
students
who
are
identified
as
having
a
22
substantial
deficiency
persistently
at
risk
in
reading
under
23
subsection
1
,
paragraph
“a”
,
with
intensive
instructional
24
services
and
supports,
free
of
charge,
to
remediate
the
25
identified
areas
of
reading
deficiency
in
which
students
are
26
not
proficient
in
reading
,
including
a
minimum
of
ninety
27
minutes
daily
of
scientific,
research-based
reading
instruction
28
and
other
strategies
prescribed
by
the
school
district
which
29
may
include
but
are
not
limited
to
the
following:
30
(1)
Small
group
instruction.
31
(2)
Reduced
teacher-student
ratios.
32
(3)
More
frequent
progress
monitoring.
33
(4)
Tutoring
or
mentoring.
34
(5)
Extended
school
day,
week,
or
year.
35
-3-
LSB
5479HV
(1)
86
kh/rj
3/
9
H.F.
2413
(6)
Summer
reading
programs.
1
b.
At
regular
intervals,
apprise
the
parent
or
guardian
of
2
academic
and
other
progress
being
made
by
the
student
and
give
3
the
parent
or
guardian
other
useful
information.
4
c.
In
addition
to
required
reading
enhancement
and
5
acceleration
strategies,
provide
parents
of
students
who
are
6
identified
as
having
a
substantial
deficiency
persistently
at
7
risk
in
reading
under
subsection
1
,
paragraph
“a”
,
with
a
plan
8
outlined
in
a
parental
contract,
including
participation
in
9
regular
parent-guided
home
reading.
10
d.
Establish
a
reading
enhancement
and
acceleration
11
development
initiative
designed
to
offer
intensive
accelerated
12
reading
instruction
to
each
kindergarten
through
grade
three
13
student
who
is
assessed
as
exhibiting
a
substantial
deficiency
14
persistently
at
risk
in
reading.
The
initiative
shall
comply
15
with
all
of
the
following
criteria:
16
(1)
Be
provided
to
all
kindergarten
through
grade
17
three
students
who
exhibit
a
substantial
deficiency
in
are
18
persistently
at
risk
in
reading
under
this
section
.
The
19
assessment
initiative
shall
measure
phonemic
awareness,
20
phonics,
fluency,
vocabulary,
and
comprehension.
21
(2)
Be
provided
during
regular
school
hours
in
addition
to
22
the
regular
reading
instruction.
23
(3)
Provide
a
reading
curriculum
that
meets
guidelines
24
adopted
pursuant
to
section
256.7,
subsection
31
,
and
at
a
25
minimum
has
the
following
specifications:
26
(a)
Assists
students
assessed
as
exhibiting
a
substantial
27
deficiency
in
who
are
persistently
at
risk
in
reading
to
28
develop
the
skills
to
read
at
grade
level.
Assistance
shall
29
include
but
not
be
limited
to
strategies
that
formally
address
30
dyslexia,
when
appropriate.
For
purposes
of
this
subparagraph
31
division
(a),
“dyslexia”
means
a
specific
and
significant
32
impairment
in
the
development
of
reading,
including
but
not
33
limited
to
phonemic
awareness,
phonics,
fluency,
vocabulary,
34
and
comprehension,
that
is
not
solely
accounted
for
by
35
-4-
LSB
5479HV
(1)
86
kh/rj
4/
9
H.F.
2413
intellectual
disability,
sensory
disability
or
impairment,
or
1
lack
of
appropriate
instruction.
2
(b)
Provides
skill
development
in
phonemic
awareness,
3
phonics,
fluency,
vocabulary,
and
comprehension.
4
(c)
Includes
a
scientifically
based
and
reliable
5
assessment.
6
(d)
Provides
initial
and
ongoing
analysis
of
each
student’s
7
reading
progress.
8
(e)
Is
implemented
during
regular
school
hours.
9
(f)
Provides
a
curriculum
in
core
academic
subjects
to
10
assist
the
student
in
maintaining
or
meeting
proficiency
levels
11
for
the
appropriate
grade
in
all
academic
subjects.
12
e.
Offer
each
summer,
beginning
in
the
summer
of
2017,
13
unless
the
school
district
receives
a
waiver
from
this
14
requirement
from
the
department
of
education
for
the
summer
of
15
2017,
an
intensive
summer
literacy
reading
program
for
students
16
assessed
as
exhibiting
a
substantial
deficiency
in
who
are
17
persistently
at
risk
in
reading.
The
program
shall
meet
the
18
criteria
and
follow
the
guidelines
established
pursuant
to
19
section
256.9,
subsection
53
,
paragraph
“c”
,
subparagraph
(1),
20
subparagraph
division
(g).
21
f.
Report
to
the
department
of
education
the
specific
22
intensive
reading
interventions
and
supports
implemented
by
the
23
school
district
pursuant
to
this
section
.
The
department
shall
24
annually
prescribe
the
components
of
required
or
requested
25
reports.
26
3.
Promotion
to
grade
four.
In
determining
whether
to
27
promote
a
student
in
grade
three
to
grade
four,
a
school
28
district
shall
place
significant
weight
on
any
area
in
which
29
the
student
is
persistently
at
risk
in
reading
deficiency
30
identified
pursuant
to
subsection
1
,
paragraph
“a”
,
that
is
31
not
yet
remediated
.
The
school
district
shall
also
weigh
32
the
student’s
progress
in
other
subject
areas,
as
well
as
33
the
student’s
overall
intellectual,
physical,
emotional,
and
34
social
development.
A
decision
to
retain
a
student
in
grade
35
-5-
LSB
5479HV
(1)
86
kh/rj
5/
9
H.F.
2413
three
shall
be
made
only
after
direct
personal
consultation
1
with
the
student’s
parent
or
guardian
and
after
the
formulation
2
of
a
specific
plan
of
action
to
remedy
increase
the
student’s
3
reading
deficiency
skills
until
the
student
is
reading
at
grade
4
level
.
5
4.
Ensuring
continuous
improvement
in
reading
proficiency.
6
a.
To
ensure
all
children
are
reading
proficiently
by
the
7
end
of
third
grade,
each
school
district
shall
address
reading
8
proficiency
as
part
of
its
comprehensive
school
improvement
9
plan,
drawing
upon
information
about
children
students
from
10
assessments
and
reassessments
conducted
pursuant
to
subsection
11
1
and
the
prevalence
of
deficiencies
areas
in
which
students
12
are
persistently
at
risk
in
reading
identified
by
classroom,
13
elementary
school,
and
other
student
characteristics.
As
part
14
of
its
comprehensive
school
improvement
plan,
each
school
15
district
shall
review
chronic
early
elementary
absenteeism
16
for
its
impact
on
literacy
development.
If
more
than
fifteen
17
percent
of
an
attendance
center’s
students
are
not
proficient
18
in
reading
proficiently
and
are
persistently
at
risk
in
19
reading
by
the
end
of
third
grade,
the
comprehensive
school
20
improvement
plan
shall
include
strategies
to
reduce
that
21
percentage,
including
school
and
community
strategies
to
raise
22
the
percentage
of
students
who
are
proficient
in
reading
at
23
grade
level
.
24
b.
Each
school
district,
subject
to
an
appropriation
of
25
funds
by
the
general
assembly,
shall
provide
professional
26
development
services
to
enhance
the
skills
of
elementary
27
teachers
in
responding
to
children’s
unique
reading
issues
and
28
needs
and
to
increase
the
use
of
evidence-based
strategies.
29
5.
Good
cause
exemption.
30
a.
The
school
district
shall
exempt
students
from
the
31
retention
and
intensive
summer
reading
program
requirements
32
of
subsection
1
,
paragraph
“c”
,
for
good
cause.
Good
cause
33
exemptions
shall
be
limited
to
the
following:
34
(1)
Limited
English
proficient
students
who
have
had
35
-6-
LSB
5479HV
(1)
86
kh/rj
6/
9
H.F.
2413
less
than
two
years
of
instruction
in
an
English
as
a
second
1
language
program.
2
(2)
Students
requiring
special
education
whose
3
individualized
education
program
indicates
that
participation
4
in
a
locally
determined
or
statewide
assessment
as
provided
in
5
section
256.7,
subsection
31
,
is
not
appropriate,
consistent
6
with
the
requirements
of
rules
adopted
by
the
state
board
of
7
education
for
the
administration
of
chapter
256B
.
8
(3)
Students
who
demonstrate
an
acceptable
level
of
9
performance
on
an
alternative
performance
measure
approved
10
pursuant
to
section
256.7,
subsection
31
.
11
(4)
Students
who
demonstrate
mastery
through
a
student
12
portfolio
under
alternative
performance
measures
approved
13
pursuant
to
section
256.7,
subsection
31
.
14
(5)
Students
who
have
received
intensive
remediation
in
15
reading
for
two
or
more
years
but
who
are
still
demonstrate
16
a
deficiency
persistently
at
risk
in
reading
and
who
were
17
previously
retained
in
kindergarten,
grade
one,
grade
two,
18
or
grade
three.
Intensive
reading
instruction
for
students
19
so
promoted
must
include
an
altered
instructional
day
that
20
includes
specialized
diagnostic
information
and
specific
21
reading
strategies
for
each
student.
The
school
district
22
shall
assist
attendance
centers
and
teachers
to
implement
23
reading
strategies
that
research
has
shown
to
be
successful
in
24
improving
reading
among
low-performing
readers.
25
b.
Requests
For
students
described
in
paragraph
“a”
,
26
subparagraphs
(3)
and
(4),
a
request
for
a
good
cause
27
exemptions
exemption
from
the
retention
requirement
of
28
subsection
1
,
paragraph
“c”
,
for
students
described
in
29
paragraph
“a”
,
subparagraphs
(3)
and
(4),
shall
include
30
documentation
from
the
student’s
teacher
to
the
school
31
principal
that
indicates
that
the
promotion
of
the
student
is
32
appropriate
and
is
based
upon
the
student’s
academic
record.
33
Such
documentation
shall
include
but
not
be
limited
to
the
34
individualized
education
program,
if
applicable,
report
card,
35
-7-
LSB
5479HV
(1)
86
kh/rj
7/
9
H.F.
2413
or
student
portfolio.
1
EXPLANATION
2
The
inclusion
of
this
explanation
does
not
constitute
agreement
with
3
the
explanation’s
substance
by
the
members
of
the
general
assembly.
4
This
bill
provides
that
a
student
in
kindergarten
5
through
grade
three
who
is
not
reading
proficiently
and
is
6
persistently
at
risk
in
reading
based
on
locally
determined
7
or
statewide
assessments,
must
be
provided
intensive
reading
8
instruction
by
the
school
district
and
must
be
reassessed
for
9
reading
proficiency
using
locally
determined
or
statewide
10
assessments,
including
periodic
universal
screening
and
annual
11
standard-based
assessments
before
the
child
is
retained
in
12
grade
three
under
the
provisions
of
Code
section
279.68.
13
The
bill
also
replaces
references
relating
to
a
student’s
14
“substantial
deficiency
in
reading”
with
references
to
a
15
student
who
is
“persistently
at
risk
in
reading”,
which
16
is
defined
to
mean
the
student
has
not
met
the
grade-level
17
benchmark
on
two
consecutive
screening
assessments
administered
18
in
accordance
with
the
Code
provision,
and
makes
related
19
changes
as
necessary.
For
consistency,
the
bill
also
replaces
20
one
reference
to
“intensive
summer
literacy
program”
with
21
“intensive
summer
reading
program”,
and
replaces
references
to
22
“child”
with
“student”.
23
Currently,
the
parent
or
guardian
of
such
a
student
shall
be
24
notified
at
least
annually
that
the
child
has
been
identified
25
as
having
a
substantial
deficiency
in
reading,
and
shall
be
26
given
a
description
of
the
services
currently
provided
to
the
27
child,
a
description
of
the
proposed
supplemental
instructional
28
services
and
supports
that
the
school
district
will
provide
29
to
the
child
to
remediate
the
identified
area
of
reading
30
deficiency,
and
strategies
for
parents
and
guardians
to
use
31
in
helping
the
child
succeed
in
reading
proficiency.
The
32
bill
strikes
the
requirement
that
the
information
be
provided
33
annually,
but
adds
that
the
school
district
must
provide
the
34
parent
or
guardian
of
a
student
who
is
not
reading
proficiently
35
-8-
LSB
5479HV
(1)
86
kh/rj
8/
9
H.F.
2413
and
who
is
persistently
at
risk
in
reading
with
regular
updates
1
regarding
the
student’s
progress
toward
reaching
or
exceeding
2
the
targeted
level
of
reading
proficiency.
3
The
bill
makes
corresponding
changes.
4
-9-
LSB
5479HV
(1)
86
kh/rj
9/
9