House
File
262
-
Introduced
HOUSE
FILE
262
BY
HEATON
A
BILL
FOR
An
Act
establishing
an
office
of
administrative
hearings
within
1
the
department
of
management.
2
BE
IT
ENACTED
BY
THE
GENERAL
ASSEMBLY
OF
THE
STATE
OF
IOWA:
3
TLSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
H.F.
262
Section
1.
NEW
SECTION
.
8.71
Office
of
administrative
1
hearings
——
creation,
powers,
duties.
2
1.
For
purposes
of
this
section,
unless
the
context
3
otherwise
requires:
4
a.
“Administrator”
means
the
chief
administrative
law
judge.
5
b.
“Office”
means
the
office
of
administrative
hearings
of
6
the
department
of
management.
7
2.
An
independent
office
of
administrative
hearings
within
8
the
department
is
created
to
be
headed
and
administered
by
a
9
chief
administrative
law
judge
appointed
as
administrator
of
10
the
office
by
the
governor
for
a
term
of
six
years
subject
11
to
confirmation
by
the
senate.
The
administrator
may
be
12
removed
by
the
governor
at
any
time
for
good
cause.
The
13
administrator
shall
coordinate
the
office’s
conduct
of
appeals
14
and
administrative
hearings
as
provided
by
law.
15
3.
a.
The
office
shall
employ
a
sufficient
number
of
16
administrative
law
judges
to
conduct
proceedings
for
which
17
agencies
are
required,
by
section
17A.11
or
any
other
provision
18
of
law,
to
use
an
administrative
law
judge
employed
by
the
19
office.
An
administrative
law
judge
employed
by
the
office
20
shall
not
perform
duties
inconsistent
with
the
judge’s
duties
21
and
responsibilities
as
an
administrative
law
judge
and
shall
22
be
located
in
an
office
that
is
separated
from
the
offices
of
23
the
agencies
for
which
that
person
acts
as
a
presiding
officer.
24
Administrative
law
judges
shall
be
covered
by
the
merit
system
25
provisions
of
chapter
8A,
subchapter
IV.
26
b.
The
office
shall
facilitate,
insofar
as
practicable,
27
specialization
by
its
administrative
law
judges
so
that
28
particular
judges
may
become
expert
in
presiding
over
cases
29
in
particular
agencies.
An
agency
may,
by
rule,
identify
30
particular
classes
of
its
contested
cases
for
which
the
31
administrative
law
judge
who
acts
as
presiding
officer
shall
32
have
specified
technical
expertise.
After
the
adoption
of
such
33
a
rule,
the
office
may
assign
administrative
law
judges
to
34
preside
over
those
identified
particular
classes
of
contested
35
-1-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
1/
18
H.F.
262
cases
only
if
the
administrative
law
judge
possesses
the
1
technical
expertise
specified
by
agency
rule.
The
office
may
2
charge
the
applicable
agency
for
the
costs
of
any
training
3
required
by
the
office’s
administrative
law
judges
to
acquire
4
or
maintain
the
technical
expertise
specified
by
agency
rule.
5
4.
If
the
office
cannot
furnish
one
of
its
administrative
6
law
judges
in
response
to
an
agency
request,
the
administrator
7
shall
designate
in
writing
a
full-time
employee
of
an
agency
8
other
than
the
requesting
agency
to
serve
as
administrative
9
law
judge
for
the
proceeding,
but
only
with
the
consent
of
10
the
employing
agency.
The
designee
must
possess
the
same
11
qualifications
required
of
administrative
law
judges
employed
12
by
the
office.
13
5.
The
office
may
furnish
administrative
law
judges
on
14
a
contract
basis
to
any
governmental
entity
to
conduct
any
15
proceeding.
16
6.
A
person
shall
not
be
newly
employed
by
the
office
as
17
an
administrative
law
judge
to
preside
over
contested
case
18
proceedings
unless
that
person
has
a
license
to
practice
law
19
in
this
state.
20
7.
The
office
shall
adopt
rules
pursuant
to
this
chapter
and
21
chapter
17A
to
do
all
of
the
following:
22
a.
To
establish
procedures
for
agencies
to
request
and
for
23
the
administrator
to
assign
administrative
law
judges
employed
24
by
the
office.
25
b.
To
establish
procedures
and
adopt
forms,
consistent
26
with
chapter
17A
and
other
provisions
of
law,
to
govern
27
administrative
law
judges
employed
by
the
office,
but
any
28
rules
adopted
under
this
paragraph
shall
be
applicable
to
a
29
particular
contested
case
proceeding
only
to
the
extent
that
30
they
are
not
inconsistent
with
the
rules
of
the
agency
under
31
whose
authority
that
proceeding
is
conducted.
Nothing
in
this
32
paragraph
precludes
an
agency
from
establishing
procedural
33
requirements
otherwise
within
its
authority
to
govern
its
34
contested
case
proceedings,
including
requirements
with
35
-2-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
2/
18
H.F.
262
respect
to
the
timeliness
of
decisions
rendered
for
it
by
1
administrative
law
judges.
2
c.
To
establish
standards
and
procedures
for
the
evaluation,
3
training,
promotion,
and
discipline
for
the
administrative
law
4
judges
employed
by
the
office.
The
procedures
shall
include
5
provisions
for
each
agency
for
whom
a
particular
administrative
6
law
judge
presides
to
submit
to
the
office
on
a
periodic
basis
7
the
agency’s
views
with
respect
to
the
performance
of
that
8
administrative
law
judge
or
the
need
for
specified
additional
9
training
for
that
administrative
law
judge.
However,
the
10
evaluation,
training,
promotion,
and
discipline
of
all
11
administrative
law
judges
employed
by
the
office
shall
remain
12
solely
within
the
authority
of
the
office.
13
d.
To
establish,
consistent
with
the
provisions
of
this
14
section
and
chapter
17A,
a
code
of
administrative
judicial
15
conduct
that
is
similar
in
function
and
substantially
16
equivalent
to
the
Iowa
code
of
judicial
conduct,
to
govern
17
the
conduct,
in
relation
to
their
quasi-judicial
functions
in
18
contested
cases,
of
all
persons
who
act
as
presiding
officers
19
under
the
authority
of
section
17A.11,
subsection
1.
The
code
20
of
administrative
judicial
conduct
shall
separately
specify
21
which
provisions
are
applicable
to
agency
heads
or
members
of
22
multimembered
agency
heads
when
they
act
as
presiding
officers,
23
taking
into
account
the
objectives
of
the
code
and
the
fact
24
that
agency
heads,
unlike
administrative
law
judges,
have
other
25
duties
imposed
upon
them
by
law.
The
code
of
administrative
26
judicial
conduct
may
also
contain
separate
provisions,
which
27
are
appropriate
and
consistent
with
the
objectives
of
such
a
28
code,
to
govern
the
conduct
of
agency
heads
or
the
members
of
29
multimember
agency
heads
when
they
act
as
presiding
officers.
30
However,
a
provision
of
the
code
of
administrative
judicial
31
conduct
shall
not
be
made
applicable
to
agency
heads
or
members
32
of
multimember
agency
heads
unless
the
application
of
that
33
provision
to
agency
heads
and
members
of
multimember
agency
34
heads
has
previously
been
approved
by
the
administrative
rules
35
-3-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
3/
18
H.F.
262
coordinator.
1
e.
To
facilitate
the
performance
of
the
responsibilities
2
conferred
upon
the
office
by
this
section,
chapter
17A,
and
any
3
other
provision
of
law.
4
8.
The
office
may
do
all
of
the
following:
5
a.
Provide
administrative
law
judges,
upon
request,
to
any
6
agency
that
is
required
to
or
wishes
to
utilize
the
services
of
7
an
administrative
law
judge
employed
by
the
office.
8
b.
Maintain
a
staff
of
reporters
and
other
personnel.
9
c.
Administer
the
provisions
of
this
section
and
rules
10
adopted
under
its
authority.
11
9.
The
office
may
charge
agencies
for
services
rendered
and
12
the
payment
received
shall
be
considered
repayment
receipts
as
13
defined
in
section
8.2.
14
10.
Except
to
the
extent
specified
otherwise
by
statute,
15
decisions
of
administrative
law
judges
employed
by
the
office
16
are
subject
to
review
by
the
agencies
for
which
they
act
as
17
presiding
officers
as
provided
by
section
17A.15
or
any
other
18
provision
of
law.
19
Sec.
2.
Section
10A.106,
subsection
1,
paragraph
a,
Code
20
2013,
is
amended
by
striking
the
paragraph.
21
Sec.
3.
Section
10A.106,
subsection
2,
Code
2013,
is
amended
22
to
read
as
follows:
23
2.
The
allocation
of
departmental
duties
to
the
divisions
of
24
the
department
in
sections
10A.402
,
and
10A.702
,
and
10A.801
25
does
not
prohibit
the
director
from
reallocating
departmental
26
duties
within
the
department.
27
Sec.
4.
Section
17A.11,
subsection
1,
paragraph
a,
28
unnumbered
paragraph
1,
Code
2013,
is
amended
to
read
as
29
follows:
30
If
the
agency
or
an
officer
of
the
agency
under
whose
31
authority
the
contested
case
is
to
take
place
is
a
named
32
party
to
that
proceeding
or
a
real
party
in
interest
to
that
33
proceeding
the
presiding
officer
may
be,
in
the
discretion
34
of
the
agency,
either
the
agency,
one
or
more
members
of
a
35
-4-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
4/
18
H.F.
262
multimember
agency,
or
one
or
more
administrative
law
judges
1
assigned
by
the
division
office
of
administrative
hearings
2
in
accordance
with
the
provisions
of
section
10A.801
8.71
.
3
However,
a
party
may,
within
a
time
period
specified
by
4
rule,
request
that
the
presiding
officer
be
an
administrative
5
law
judge
assigned
by
the
division
office
of
administrative
6
hearings.
Except
as
otherwise
provided
by
statute,
the
agency
7
shall
grant
a
request
by
a
party
for
an
administrative
law
8
judge
unless
the
agency
finds,
and
states
reasons
for
the
9
finding,
that
any
of
the
following
conditions
exist:
10
Sec.
5.
Section
17A.11,
subsection
1,
paragraphs
b
and
c,
11
Code
2013,
are
amended
to
read
as
follows:
12
b.
If
the
agency
or
an
officer
of
the
agency
under
whose
13
authority
the
contested
case
is
to
take
place
is
not
a
named
14
party
to
that
proceeding
or
a
real
party
in
interest
to
that
15
proceeding
the
presiding
officer
may
be,
in
the
discretion
16
of
the
agency,
either
the
agency,
one
or
more
members
of
a
17
multimember
agency,
an
administrative
law
judge
assigned
by
the
18
division
office
of
administrative
hearings
in
accordance
with
19
the
provisions
of
section
10A.801
8.71
,
or
any
other
qualified
20
person
designated
as
a
presiding
officer
by
the
agency.
Any
21
other
person
designated
as
a
presiding
officer
by
the
agency
22
may
be
employed
by
and
officed
in
the
agency
for
which
that
23
person
acts
as
a
presiding
officer,
but
such
a
person
shall
24
not
perform
duties
inconsistent
with
that
person’s
duties
and
25
responsibilities
as
a
presiding
officer.
26
c.
For
purposes
of
paragraph
“a”
,
the
division
office
27
of
administrative
hearings
established
in
section
10A.801
28
8.71
shall
be
treated
as
a
wholly
separate
agency
from
the
29
department
of
inspections
and
appeals
management
.
30
Sec.
6.
Section
20.6,
subsection
4,
Code
2013,
is
amended
31
to
read
as
follows:
32
4.
Hold
hearings
and
administer
oaths,
examine
witnesses
33
and
documents,
take
testimony
and
receive
evidence,
issue
34
subpoenas
to
compel
the
attendance
of
witnesses
and
the
35
-5-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
5/
18
H.F.
262
production
of
records,
and
delegate
such
power
to
a
member
1
of
the
board,
persons
appointed
or
employed
by
the
board,
2
including
administrative
law
judges,
or
administrative
law
3
judges
employed
by
the
division
office
of
administrative
4
hearings
created
by
section
10A.801
8.71
,
for
the
performance
5
of
its
functions.
The
board
may
petition
the
district
court
at
6
the
seat
of
government
or
of
the
county
where
a
hearing
is
held
7
to
enforce
a
board
order
compelling
the
attendance
of
witnesses
8
and
production
of
records.
9
Sec.
7.
Section
20.11,
subsection
2,
Code
2013,
is
amended
10
to
read
as
follows:
11
2.
The
board
may
designate
one
of
its
members,
an
12
administrative
law
judge
employed
by
the
office
of
13
administrative
hearings
created
by
section
8.71
,
or
any
14
other
qualified
person
employed
by
the
board
to
serve
as
the
15
presiding
officer
at
the
hearing.
The
presiding
officer
has
16
the
powers
as
may
be
exercised
by
the
board
for
conducting
the
17
hearing
and
shall
follow
the
procedures
adopted
by
the
board
18
for
conducting
the
hearing.
The
proposed
decision
of
the
19
presiding
officer
may
be
appealed
to
the
board,
or
reviewed
20
on
motion
of
the
board,
in
accordance
with
the
provisions
of
21
chapter
17A
.
22
Sec.
8.
Section
68B.32C,
subsection
2,
Code
2013,
is
amended
23
to
read
as
follows:
24
2.
Hearings
held
pursuant
to
this
chapter
shall
be
heard
25
by
a
quorum
of
the
board,
unless
the
board
designates
a
board
26
member
or
an
administrative
law
judge
employed
by
the
office
27
of
administrative
hearings
created
by
section
8.71
to
preside
28
at
the
hearing.
If
a
quorum
of
the
board
does
not
preside
at
29
the
hearing,
the
board
member
or
administrative
law
judge
shall
30
make
a
proposed
decision.
The
board
or
presiding
board
member
31
may
be
assisted
by
an
administrative
law
judge
in
the
conduct
32
of
the
hearing
and
the
preparation
of
a
decision.
33
Sec.
9.
Section
96.6,
subsection
3,
paragraph
b,
Code
2013,
34
is
amended
to
read
as
follows:
35
-6-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
6/
18
H.F.
262
b.
Appeals
from
the
initial
determination
shall
be
heard
1
by
an
administrative
law
judge
employed
by
the
department
2
office
of
administrative
hearings
created
by
section
8.71
.
3
An
administrative
law
judge’s
decision
may
be
appealed
by
4
any
party
to
the
employment
appeal
board
created
in
section
5
10A.601
.
The
decision
of
the
appeal
board
is
final
agency
6
action
and
an
appeal
of
the
decision
shall
be
made
directly
to
7
the
district
court.
8
Sec.
10.
Section
97B.20B,
Code
2013,
is
amended
to
read
as
9
follows:
10
97B.20B
Hearing
by
administrative
law
judge.
11
If
an
appeal
is
filed
and
is
not
withdrawn,
an
administrative
12
law
judge
employed
by
the
office
of
administrative
hearings
13
created
by
section
8.71
in
the
department
of
inspections
and
14
appeals
management
,
after
affording
the
parties
reasonable
15
opportunity
for
fair
hearing,
shall
affirm,
modify,
or
reverse
16
the
decision
of
the
system.
The
hearing
shall
be
recorded
17
by
mechanical
means
and
a
transcript
of
the
hearing
shall
be
18
made.
The
transcript
shall
then
be
made
available
for
use
by
19
the
employment
appeal
board
and
by
the
courts
at
subsequent
20
judicial
review
proceedings
under
the
Iowa
administrative
21
procedure
Act,
chapter
17A
,
if
any.
The
parties
shall
be
duly
22
notified
of
the
administrative
law
judge’s
decision,
together
23
with
the
administrative
law
judge’s
reasons.
The
decision
is
24
final
unless,
within
thirty
days
after
the
date
of
notification
25
or
mailing
of
the
decision,
review
by
the
employment
appeal
26
board
is
initiated
pursuant
to
section
97B.27
.
27
Sec.
11.
Section
123.32,
subsection
6,
paragraph
b,
Code
28
2013,
is
amended
to
read
as
follows:
29
b.
Upon
receipt
of
an
application
having
been
approved
by
30
the
local
authority,
the
division
shall
make
an
investigation
31
as
the
administrator
deems
necessary
to
determine
that
the
32
applicant
complies
with
all
requirements
for
holding
a
license
33
or
permit,
and
may
require
the
applicant
to
appear
to
be
34
examined
under
oath
to
demonstrate
that
the
applicant
complies
35
-7-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
7/
18
H.F.
262
with
all
of
the
requirements
to
hold
a
license
or
permit.
If
1
the
administrator
requires
the
applicant
to
appear
and
to
2
testify
under
oath,
a
record
shall
be
made
of
all
testimony
or
3
evidence
and
the
record
shall
become
a
part
of
the
application.
4
The
administrator
may
appoint
a
member
of
the
division
or
may
5
request
an
administrative
law
judge
employed
by
the
office
6
of
administrative
hearings
created
by
section
8.71
of
the
7
department
of
inspections
and
appeals
management
to
receive
8
the
testimony
under
oath
and
evidence,
and
to
issue
a
proposed
9
decision
to
approve
or
disapprove
the
application
for
a
license
10
or
permit.
The
administrator
may
affirm,
reverse,
or
modify
11
the
proposed
decision
to
approve
or
disapprove
the
application
12
for
the
license
or
permit.
If
the
application
is
approved
13
by
the
administrator,
the
license
or
permit
shall
be
issued.
14
If
the
application
is
disapproved
by
the
administrator,
the
15
applicant
and
the
appropriate
local
authority
shall
be
so
16
notified
by
certified
mail.
17
Sec.
12.
Section
123.32,
subsections
7
and
9,
Code
2013,
are
18
amended
to
read
as
follows:
19
7.
Appeal
to
administrator.
An
applicant
for
a
liquor
20
control
license,
wine
permit,
or
beer
permit
may
appeal
from
21
the
local
authority’s
disapproval
of
an
application
for
a
22
license
or
permit
to
the
administrator.
In
the
appeal
the
23
applicant
shall
be
allowed
the
opportunity
to
demonstrate
in
24
an
evidentiary
hearing
conducted
pursuant
to
chapter
17A
that
25
the
applicant
complies
with
all
of
the
requirements
for
holding
26
the
license
or
permit.
The
administrator
may
appoint
a
member
27
of
the
division
or
may
request
an
administrative
law
judge
28
employed
by
the
office
of
administrative
hearings
created
in
29
section
8.71
from
the
department
of
inspections
and
appeals
30
management
to
conduct
the
evidentiary
hearing
and
to
render
a
31
proposed
decision
to
approve
or
disapprove
the
issuance
of
the
32
license
or
permit.
The
administrator
may
affirm,
reverse,
or
33
modify
the
proposed
decision.
If
the
administrator
determines
34
that
the
applicant
complies
with
all
of
the
requirements
for
35
-8-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
8/
18
H.F.
262
holding
a
license
or
permit,
the
administrator
shall
order
1
the
issuance
of
the
license
or
permit.
If
the
administrator
2
determines
that
the
applicant
does
not
comply
with
the
3
requirements
for
holding
a
license
or
permit,
the
administrator
4
shall
disapprove
the
issuance
of
the
license
or
permit.
5
9.
Suspension
by
local
authority.
A
liquor
control
licensee
6
or
a
wine
or
beer
permittee
whose
license
or
permit
has
been
7
suspended
or
revoked
or
a
civil
penalty
imposed
by
a
local
8
authority
for
a
violation
of
this
chapter
or
suspended
by
9
a
local
authority
for
violation
of
a
local
ordinance
may
10
appeal
the
suspension,
revocation,
or
civil
penalty
to
the
11
administrator.
The
administrator
may
appoint
a
member
of
the
12
division
or
may
request
an
administrative
law
judge
employed
13
by
the
office
of
administrative
hearings
created
in
section
14
8.71
from
the
department
of
inspections
and
appeals
management
15
to
hear
the
appeal
which
shall
be
conducted
in
accordance
16
with
chapter
17A
and
to
issue
a
proposed
decision.
The
17
administrator
may
review
the
proposed
decision
upon
the
motion
18
of
a
party
to
the
appeal
or
upon
the
administrator’s
own
motion
19
in
accordance
with
chapter
17A
.
Upon
review
of
the
proposed
20
decision,
the
administrator
may
affirm,
reverse,
or
modify
the
21
proposed
decision.
A
liquor
control
licensee,
wine
or
beer
22
permittee,
or
a
local
authority
aggrieved
by
a
decision
of
the
23
administrator
may
seek
judicial
review
of
the
decision
pursuant
24
to
chapter
17A
.
25
Sec.
13.
Section
123.39,
subsection
1,
paragraph
a,
Code
26
2013,
is
amended
to
read
as
follows:
27
a.
The
administrator
or
the
local
authority
may
suspend
28
a
license
or
permit
issued
pursuant
to
this
chapter
for
a
29
period
not
to
exceed
one
year,
revoke
the
license
or
permit,
30
or
impose
a
civil
penalty
not
to
exceed
one
thousand
dollars
31
per
violation.
Before
suspension,
revocation,
or
imposition
32
of
a
civil
penalty,
the
license
or
permit
holder
shall
be
33
given
written
notice
and
an
opportunity
for
a
hearing.
The
34
administrator
may
appoint
a
member
of
the
division
or
may
35
-9-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
9/
18
H.F.
262
request
an
administrative
law
judge
employed
by
the
office
1
of
administrative
hearings
created
in
section
8.71
from
the
2
department
of
inspections
and
appeals
management
to
conduct
3
the
hearing
and
issue
a
proposed
decision.
Upon
the
motion
4
of
a
party
to
the
hearing
or
upon
the
administrator’s
own
5
motion,
the
administrator
may
review
the
proposed
decision
6
in
accordance
with
chapter
17A
.
Upon
review
of
the
proposed
7
decision,
the
administrator
may
affirm,
reverse,
or
modify
the
8
proposed
decision.
A
licensee
or
permittee
aggrieved
by
a
9
decision
of
the
administrator
may
seek
judicial
review
of
the
10
administrator’s
decision
in
accordance
with
chapter
17A
.
11
Sec.
14.
Section
216.15,
subsection
3,
paragraph
a,
Code
12
2013,
is
amended
to
read
as
follows:
13
a.
After
the
filing
of
a
verified
complaint,
a
true
copy
14
shall
be
served
within
twenty
days
on
the
person
against
whom
15
the
complaint
is
filed,
except
as
provided
in
subsection
4
.
16
An
authorized
member
of
the
commission
staff
shall
make
a
17
prompt
investigation
and
shall
issue
a
recommendation
to
an
18
administrative
law
judge
employed
either
by
the
commission
or
19
by
the
division
office
of
administrative
hearings
created
by
20
section
10A.801
8.71
,
who
shall
then
issue
a
determination
of
21
probable
cause
or
no
probable
cause.
22
Sec.
15.
Section
216.15,
subsection
6,
Code
2013,
is
amended
23
to
read
as
follows:
24
6.
When
the
director
is
satisfied
that
further
endeavor
to
25
settle
a
complaint
by
conference,
conciliation,
and
persuasion
26
is
unworkable
and
should
be
bypassed,
and
the
thirty-day
period
27
provided
for
in
subsection
3
has
expired
without
agreement,
the
28
director
with
the
approval
of
a
commissioner,
shall
issue
and
29
cause
to
be
served
a
written
notice
specifying
the
charges
in
30
the
complaint
as
they
may
have
been
amended
and
the
reasons
for
31
bypassing
conciliation,
if
the
conciliation
is
bypassed,
and
32
requiring
the
respondent
to
answer
the
charges
of
the
complaint
33
at
a
hearing
before
the
commission,
a
commissioner,
or
a
person
34
designated
by
the
commission
to
conduct
the
hearing,
who
is
35
-10-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
10/
18
H.F.
262
employed
by
the
office
of
administrative
hearings
created
in
1
section
8.71
and
is
hereafter
referred
to
as
the
administrative
2
law
judge,
and
at
a
time
and
place
to
be
specified
in
the
3
notice.
4
Sec.
16.
Section
225C.8,
subsection
2,
Code
2013,
is
amended
5
to
read
as
follows:
6
2.
The
department
or
the
county
that
received
the
7
notification,
as
applicable,
shall
respond
to
the
party
that
8
provided
the
notification
within
forty-five
days
of
receiving
9
the
notification.
If
the
parties
cannot
agree
to
a
settlement
10
as
to
the
person’s
legal
settlement
status
within
ninety
days
11
of
the
date
of
notification,
on
motion
of
any
of
the
parties,
12
the
matter
shall
be
referred
to
the
department
of
inspections
13
and
appeals
management
for
a
contested
case
hearing
under
14
chapter
17A
before
an
administrative
law
judge
assigned
in
15
accordance
with
section
10A.801
8.71
to
determine
the
person’s
16
legal
settlement
status.
17
Sec.
17.
Section
256B.6,
subsection
4,
Code
2013,
is
amended
18
to
read
as
follows:
19
4.
Notwithstanding
section
17A.11
,
the
The
state
board
20
of
education
shall
adopt
rules
for
,
consistent
with
section
21
17A.11,
request
the
appointment
of
an
impartial
administrative
22
law
judge
employed
by
the
office
of
administrative
hearings
23
created
in
section
8.71
for
special
education
appeals.
The
24
rules
appointment
of
an
administrative
law
judge
shall
comply
25
with
federal
statutes
and
regulations.
26
Sec.
18.
Section
272.14,
Code
2013,
is
amended
to
read
as
27
follows:
28
272.14
Appointment
of
administrative
law
judges.
29
The
board
shall
maintain
a
list
of
qualified
persons
,
30
employed
by
the
office
of
administrative
hearings
created
in
31
section
8.71,
who
are
experienced
in
the
educational
system
of
32
this
state
to
serve
as
administrative
law
judges
when
a
hearing
33
is
requested
under
section
279.24
.
When
requested
under
34
section
279.24
,
the
board
shall
submit
a
list
of
five
qualified
35
-11-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
11/
18
H.F.
262
administrative
law
judges
to
the
parties.
The
parties
shall
1
select
one
of
the
five
qualified
persons
to
conduct
the
hearing
2
as
provided
in
section
279.24
.
The
hearing
shall
be
held
3
pursuant
to
the
provisions
of
chapter
17A
relating
to
contested
4
cases.
The
full
costs
of
the
hearing
shall
be
shared
equally
5
by
the
parties.
6
Sec.
19.
Section
279.24,
subsection
5,
paragraph
c,
Code
7
2013,
is
amended
to
read
as
follows:
8
c.
Within
five
days
after
receipt
of
the
written
notice
9
that
the
school
board
has
voted
to
consider
termination
of
10
the
contract,
the
administrator
may
request
in
writing
to
11
the
secretary
of
the
school
board
that
the
notification
be
12
forwarded
to
the
board
of
educational
examiners
along
with
a
13
request
that
the
board
of
educational
examiners
submit
a
list
14
of
five
qualified
administrative
law
judges
employed
by
the
15
office
of
administrative
hearings
created
in
section
8.71
to
16
the
parties.
Within
three
days
from
receipt
of
the
list
the
17
parties
shall
select
an
administrative
law
judge
by
alternately
18
removing
a
name
from
the
list
until
only
one
name
remains.
19
The
person
whose
name
remains
shall
be
the
administrative
law
20
judge.
The
parties
shall
determine
by
lot
which
party
shall
21
remove
the
first
name
from
the
list.
The
hearing
shall
be
22
held
no
sooner
than
ten
days
and
not
later
than
thirty
days
23
following
the
administrator’s
request
unless
the
parties
24
otherwise
agree.
If
the
administrator
does
not
request
a
25
hearing,
the
school
board,
not
later
than
May
31,
may
determine
26
the
continuance
or
discontinuance
of
the
contract
and,
if
the
27
board
determines
to
continue
the
administrator’s
contract,
28
whether
to
suspend
the
administrator
with
or
without
pay
for
a
29
period
specified
by
the
board.
School
board
action
shall
be
by
30
majority
roll
call
vote
entered
on
the
minutes
of
the
meeting.
31
Notice
of
school
board
action
shall
be
personally
delivered
or
32
mailed
to
the
administrator.
33
Sec.
20.
Section
284.9,
subsection
4,
Code
2013,
is
amended
34
to
read
as
follows:
35
-12-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
12/
18
H.F.
262
4.
A
teacher
who
does
not
receive
a
recommendation
from
a
1
review
panel
may
appeal
that
denial
to
an
administrative
law
2
judge
employed
by
the
office
of
administrative
hearings
created
3
in
section
8.71
and
located
in
the
department
of
inspections
4
and
appeals
management
.
The
state
shall
not
be
liable
for
a
5
teacher’s
attorney
fees,
costs,
or
damages
that
may
result
from
6
an
appeal
of
a
review
panel’s
decision.
The
state
board
shall
7
adopt
rules
to
administer
this
section
.
8
Sec.
21.
Section
331.394,
subsection
5,
paragraph
c,
Code
9
2013,
is
amended
to
read
as
follows:
10
c.
The
department,
county,
or
region
that
received
the
11
notification,
as
applicable,
shall
respond
to
the
party
that
12
provided
the
notification
within
forty-five
days
of
receiving
13
the
notification.
If
the
parties
cannot
agree
to
a
settlement
14
as
to
the
person’s
residency
status
within
ninety
days
of
the
15
date
of
notification,
on
motion
of
any
of
the
parties,
the
16
matter
shall
be
referred
to
the
department
of
inspections
and
17
appeals
management
for
a
contested
case
hearing
under
chapter
18
17A
before
an
administrative
law
judge
assigned
in
accordance
19
with
section
10A.801
8.71
to
determine
the
person’s
residency
20
status.
21
Sec.
22.
Section
331.394,
subsection
6,
paragraph
c,
Code
22
2013,
is
amended
to
read
as
follows:
23
c.
The
department,
county,
or
region
that
received
the
24
notification,
as
applicable,
shall
respond
to
the
party
25
that
provided
the
notification
within
forty-five
days
of
26
receiving
the
notification.
If
the
parties
cannot
agree
to
a
27
settlement
as
to
the
dispute
within
ninety
days
of
the
date
28
of
notification,
on
motion
of
any
of
the
parties,
the
matter
29
shall
be
referred
to
the
department
of
inspections
and
appeals
30
for
a
contested
case
hearing
under
chapter
17A
before
an
31
administrative
law
judge
assigned
in
accordance
with
section
32
10A.801
8.71
to
determine
facts
and
issue
a
decision
to
resolve
33
the
dispute.
34
Sec.
23.
Section
453A.2,
subsection
6,
Code
2013,
is
amended
35
-13-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
13/
18
H.F.
262
to
read
as
follows:
1
6.
If
a
county
or
a
city
has
not
assessed
a
penalty
pursuant
2
to
section
453A.22,
subsection
2
,
for
a
violation
of
subsection
3
1
,
within
sixty
days
of
the
adjudication
of
the
violation,
4
the
matter
shall
be
transferred
to
and
be
the
exclusive
5
responsibility
of
the
alcoholic
beverages
division
of
the
6
department
of
commerce.
Following
transfer
of
the
matter,
if
7
the
violation
is
contested,
the
alcoholic
beverages
division
8
of
the
department
of
commerce
shall
request
an
administrative
9
hearing
before
an
administrative
law
judge,
assigned
by
the
10
division
office
of
administrative
hearings
of
the
department
11
of
inspections
and
appeals
management
in
accordance
with
the
12
provisions
of
section
10A.801
8.71
,
to
adjudicate
the
matter
13
pursuant
to
chapter
17A
.
14
Sec.
24.
Section
455B.174,
subsection
4,
paragraph
b,
Code
15
2013,
is
amended
to
read
as
follows:
16
b.
In
addition
to
the
requirements
of
paragraph
“a”
,
a
17
permit
shall
not
be
issued
to
operate
or
discharge
from
any
18
disposal
system
unless
the
conditions
of
the
permit
assure
19
that
any
discharge
from
the
disposal
system
meets
or
will
20
meet
all
applicable
state
and
federal
water
quality
standards
21
and
effluent
standards
and
the
issuance
of
the
permit
is
not
22
otherwise
prohibited
by
the
federal
Water
Pollution
Control
23
Act.
All
applications
for
discharge
permits
are
subject
24
to
public
notice
and
opportunity
for
public
participation
25
including
public
hearing
as
the
department
may
by
rule
require.
26
The
director
shall
promptly
notify
the
applicant
in
writing
27
of
the
director’s
action
and,
if
the
permit
is
denied,
state
28
the
reasons
for
denial.
A
person
who
is
an
applicant
or
29
permittee
may
contest
the
denial
of
a
permit
or
any
condition
30
of
a
permit
issued
by
the
director
if
the
person
notifies
the
31
director
within
thirty
days
of
the
director’s
notice
of
denial
32
or
issuance
of
the
permit.
Notwithstanding
section
17A.11,
33
subsection
1
,
if
the
applicant
or
permittee
timely
contests
34
the
director’s
action,
the
presiding
officer
in
the
resulting
35
-14-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
14/
18
H.F.
262
contested
case
proceeding
shall
be
an
administrative
law
judge
1
assigned
by
the
division
office
of
administrative
hearings
2
pursuant
to
sections
10A.801
8.71
and
17A.11
.
3
Sec.
25.
Section
505.29,
Code
2013,
is
amended
to
read
as
4
follows:
5
505.29
Administrative
hearings.
6
The
commissioner
of
insurance
shall
have
the
authority
7
to
appoint
as
a
hearing
officer
a
designee
or
an
independent
8
administrative
law
judge.
Duties
of
a
hearing
officer
shall
9
include
hearing
contested
cases
arising
from
conduct
governed
10
by
chapters
502
,
502A
,
this
chapter
,
chapters
505A
through
11
523G
,
and
523I
.
Sections
10A.801
8.71
and
17A.11
do
not
apply
12
to
the
appointment
of
a
designee
or
an
administrative
law
judge
13
pursuant
to
this
section
.
14
Sec.
26.
Section
724.21A,
subsection
1,
Code
2013,
is
15
amended
to
read
as
follows:
16
1.
In
any
case
where
the
sheriff
or
the
commissioner
of
17
public
safety
denies
an
application
for
or
suspends
or
revokes
18
a
permit
to
carry
weapons
or
an
annual
permit
to
acquire
19
pistols
or
revolvers,
the
sheriff
or
commissioner
shall
provide
20
a
written
statement
of
the
reasons
for
the
denial,
suspension,
21
or
revocation
and
the
applicant
or
permit
holder
shall
have
22
the
right
to
appeal
the
denial,
suspension,
or
revocation
23
to
an
administrative
law
judge
employed
by
the
office
of
24
administrative
hearings
created
in
section
8.71
in
the
25
department
of
inspections
and
appeals
management
within
thirty
26
days
of
receiving
written
notice
of
the
denial,
suspension,
or
27
revocation.
28
Sec.
27.
Section
903A.1,
Code
2013,
is
amended
to
read
as
29
follows:
30
903A.1
Conduct
review.
31
The
director
of
the
Iowa
department
of
corrections
shall
32
appoint
independent
administrative
law
judges
whose
duties
33
shall
include
but
are
not
limited
to
review,
as
provided
in
34
section
903A.3
,
of
the
conduct
of
inmates
in
institutions
35
-15-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
15/
18
H.F.
262
under
the
department.
Sections
10A.801
8.71
and
17A.11
do
not
1
apply
to
administrative
law
judges
appointed
pursuant
to
this
2
section
.
3
Sec.
28.
REPEAL.
Section
10A.801,
Code
2013,
is
repealed.
4
Sec.
29.
ADMINISTRATIVE
RULES
——
TRANSITION
PROVISIONS.
5
1.
Any
rule,
regulation,
form,
order,
or
directive
6
promulgated
by
the
department
of
inspections
and
appeals
and
7
the
division
of
administrative
hearings
as
it
relates
to
the
8
division
of
administrative
hearings
which
is
in
effect
on
the
9
effective
date
of
this
Act
shall
continue
in
full
force
and
10
effect
until
amended,
repealed,
or
supplemented
by
affirmative
11
action
of
the
office
of
administrative
hearings
as
established
12
in
this
Act.
13
2.
Any
personnel
in
the
state
merit
system
of
employment
14
who
are
mandatorily
transferred
due
to
the
effect
of
this
Act
15
shall
be
so
transferred
without
any
loss
in
salary,
benefits,
16
or
accrued
years
of
service.
17
EXPLANATION
18
This
bill
establishes
an
office
of
administrative
hearings
19
within
the
department
of
management
headed
by
a
chief
20
administrative
law
judge
subject
to
appointment
by
the
governor
21
and
confirmation
by
the
senate.
22
Current
law
provides
for
a
division
of
administrative
23
hearings
within
the
department
of
inspections
and
appeals
24
headed
by
an
administrator
appointed
by
the
director
of
the
25
department.
26
Current
duties
and
authority
of
the
division
are
transferred
27
to
the
new
office.
28
In
addition
to
moving
the
division
of
administrative
29
hearings
of
the
department
of
inspections
and
appeals
to
30
the
new
office
of
administrative
hearings
in
the
department
31
of
management,
the
bill
also
modifies
the
authority
of
32
various
governmental
entities
relative
to
the
appointment
of
33
administrative
law
judges.
34
Code
section
20.6,
concerning
the
powers
of
the
public
35
-16-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
16/
18
H.F.
262
employment
relations
board,
is
amended
to
eliminate
the
ability
1
of
the
board
to
appoint
administrative
law
judges
employed
by
2
the
board.
3
Code
section
68B.32C,
concerning
the
ethics
and
campaign
4
disclosure
board,
is
amended
to
provide
that
any
administrative
5
law
judge
used
by
the
board
shall
be
employed
by
the
office
6
created
in
the
bill.
7
Code
section
96.6,
concerning
the
filing
of
unemployment
8
compensation
claims,
is
amended
to
provide
that
appeals
shall
9
be
heard
by
an
administrative
law
judge
employed
by
the
new
10
office
and
not
by
the
department
of
workforce
development.
11
Code
section
261.15,
concerning
the
civil
rights
commission,
12
is
amended
to
require
that
an
administrative
law
judge
be
13
employed
by
the
new
office
created
in
the
bill.
14
Code
section
256B.6,
concerning
the
department
of
education
15
and
special
education,
is
amended
to
provide
that
the
16
appointment
of
an
administrative
law
judge
by
the
state
board
17
of
education
shall
be
through
the
new
office
of
administrative
18
hearings
created
in
the
bill.
19
Code
sections
272.14
and
279.24,
concerning
the
educational
20
examiners
board,
are
amended
to
provide
that
administrative
21
law
judges
utilized
by
the
board
be
administrative
law
judges
22
employed
by
the
new
office
of
administrative
hearings
created
23
in
the
bill.
24
Code
section
505.29,
concerning
administrative
hearings
by
25
the
commissioner
of
insurance,
is
amended
to
require
that
the
26
appointment
of
an
administrative
law
judge
be
done
consistent
27
with
the
requirements
of
the
new
office
of
administrative
28
hearings
and
Code
section
17A.11.
29
Code
section
903A.1,
concerning
the
appointment
of
30
administrative
law
judges
by
the
department
of
corrections,
is
31
amended
to
require
that
the
appointment
of
an
administrative
32
law
judge
be
done
consistent
with
the
requirements
of
the
new
33
office
of
administrative
hearings
and
Code
section
17A.11.
34
The
bill
also
includes
transition
provisions
governing
35
-17-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
17/
18
H.F.
262
administrative
rules
and
personnel
moved
from
the
division
of
1
administrative
hearings
in
the
department
of
inspections
and
2
appeals
to
the
new
office
within
the
department
of
management.
3
-18-
LSB
1655YH
(3)
85
ec/nh
18/
18