House
File
90
-
Introduced
HOUSE
FILE
90
BY
MURPHY
A
BILL
FOR
An
Act
requiring
a
scope
of
practice
impact
statement
for
1
administrative
rules
adopted
by
certain
health-related
2
licensing
boards.
3
BE
IT
ENACTED
BY
THE
GENERAL
ASSEMBLY
OF
THE
STATE
OF
IOWA:
4
TLSB
1612HH
(3)
84
jr/rj
H.F.
90
Section
1.
NEW
SECTION
.
147.171
Scope
of
practice
impact
1
statement
and
regulatory
analysis.
2
1.
a.
A
board
enumerated
in
section
147.13
shall
publish
3
in
the
Iowa
administrative
bulletin
a
scope
of
practice
impact
4
statement
of
an
administrative
rule
within
seventy
days
after
5
the
effective
date
of
the
administrative
rule,
if
a
written
6
request
for
the
analysis
is
submitted
to
the
board
by
the
7
administrative
rules
review
committee
or
the
administrative
8
rules
coordinator.
9
b.
The
statement
shall
evaluate
the
impact
of
a
rule
upon
10
the
duties
and
functions
of
a
licensed
health
profession
11
directly
impacted
by
the
rule
and
the
duties
and
functions
of
12
health
professionals
whose
jobs
are
indirectly
impacted
by
13
the
rule.
The
statement
shall
evaluate
the
overall
effect
of
14
the
rule
on
patient
safety,
health
outcomes,
liability
issues
15
for
impacted
licensed
professionals
and
licensed
facilities,
16
working
conditions,
and
the
feasibility
of
licensees
completing
17
their
duties
in
an
appropriate
manner
based
upon
licensure
18
specifications.
19
c.
The
statement
shall
be
published
within
seventy
days
of
20
the
request.
21
2.
Prior
to
the
adoption
of
an
administrative
rule,
a
22
board
shall
issue
a
regulatory
analysis
that
complies
with
23
the
requirements
of
this
subsection,
if
the
rule
would
have
24
a
substantial
impact
on
licensed
health
professionals
and
25
if,
within
thirty-two
days
after
the
published
notice
of
the
26
proposed
rule’s
adoption,
a
written
request
for
analysis
is
27
submitted
to
the
board
by
the
administrative
rules
review
28
committee,
the
administrative
rules
coordinator,
at
least
29
twenty-five
persons
signing
that
request
who
each
are
licensees
30
of
the
profession
or
by
an
organization
representing
at
least
31
twenty-five
such
persons.
If
a
rule
has
been
adopted
without
32
prior
notice
and
an
opportunity
for
public
participation
in
33
reliance
upon
section
17A.4,
subsection
3,
the
written
request
34
for
a
regulatory
analysis
that
complies
with
this
subsection
35
-1-
LSB
1612HH
(3)
84
jr/rj
1/
4
H.F.
90
may
be
made
within
seventy
days
of
publication
of
the
rule.
1
a.
Except
to
the
extent
that
a
written
request
for
a
2
regulatory
analysis
expressly
waives
one
or
more
of
the
3
following,
the
regulatory
analysis
must
contain
all
of
the
4
following:
5
(1)
A
description
of
the
classes
of
persons
who
probably
6
will
be
affected
by
the
proposed
rule,
including
classes
that
7
may
suffer
from
the
proposed
rule
and
classes
that
will
benefit
8
from
the
proposed
rule.
9
(2)
A
description
of
the
probable
quantitative
and
10
qualitative
impact
of
the
proposed
rule,
economic
or
otherwise,
11
upon
affected
classes
of
persons,
including
a
description
of
12
the
nature
and
amount
of
all
of
the
different
kinds
of
costs
13
that
would
be
incurred
in
complying
with
the
proposed
rule.
14
(3)
The
probable
costs
to
the
agency
and
to
any
other
agency
15
of
the
implementation
and
enforcement
of
the
proposed
rule
and
16
any
anticipated
effect
on
state
revenues.
17
(4)
A
comparison
of
the
probable
costs
and
benefits
of
the
18
proposed
rule
to
the
probable
costs
and
benefits
of
inaction.
19
(5)
A
determination
of
whether
less
intrusive
methods
exist
20
for
achieving
the
purpose
of
the
proposed
rule.
21
(6)
A
description
of
any
alternative
methods
for
achieving
22
the
purpose
of
the
proposed
rule
that
were
seriously
considered
23
by
the
agency
and
the
reasons
why
they
were
rejected
in
favor
24
of
the
proposed
rule.
25
b.
Each
regulatory
analysis
must
include
quantifications
26
of
the
data
to
the
extent
practicable
and
must
take
account
of
27
both
short-term
and
long-term
consequences.
28
3.
Upon
receipt
of
a
timely
request
for
a
regulatory
29
analysis,
the
board
shall
extend
the
period
specified
in
this
30
chapter
for
each
of
the
following
until
at
least
twenty
days
31
after
publication
in
the
administrative
bulletin
of
a
concise
32
summary
of
the
regulatory
analysis:
33
a.
The
end
of
the
period
during
which
persons
may
make
34
written
submissions
on
the
proposed
rule.
35
-2-
LSB
1612HH
(3)
84
jr/rj
2/
4
H.F.
90
b.
The
end
of
the
period
during
which
an
oral
proceeding
may
1
be
requested.
2
c.
The
date
of
any
required
oral
proceeding
on
the
proposed
3
rule.
4
4.
In
the
case
of
a
rule
adopted
without
prior
notice
and
an
5
opportunity
for
public
participation
in
reliance
upon
section
6
17A.4,
subsection
3,
the
summary
must
be
published
within
7
seventy
days
of
the
request.
8
5.
The
published
summary
of
the
regulatory
analysis
must
9
also
indicate
where
persons
may
obtain
copies
of
the
full
text
10
of
the
analysis
and
where,
when,
and
how
persons
may
present
11
their
views
on
the
proposed
rule
and
demand
an
oral
proceeding
12
thereon
if
one
is
not
already
provided.
Agencies
shall
make
13
available
to
the
public,
to
the
maximum
extent
feasible,
the
14
published
summary
and
the
full
text
of
the
analysis
described
15
in
this
subsection
in
an
electronic
format,
including
but
not
16
limited
to
access
to
the
documents
through
the
internet.
17
6.
If
the
agency
has
made
a
good
faith
effort
to
comply
with
18
the
requirements
of
subsections
1
through
3,
the
rule
may
not
19
be
invalidated
on
the
ground
that
the
contents
of
the
analysis
20
are
insufficient
or
inaccurate.
21
EXPLANATION
22
This
bill
creates
two
distinct
analysis
requirements
for
23
administrative
rules
adopted
by
health-related
licensing
24
boards.
25
The
scope
of
practice
impact
statement
requires
that
a
26
health-related
licensing
board
analyze
the
impact
of
a
rule
27
upon
the
duties
and
functions
of
a
licensed
health
profession
28
directly
impacted
by
the
rule
and
the
duties
and
functions
29
of
health
professionals
whose
jobs
are
indirectly
impacted
30
by
a
proposed
rule.
The
statement
may
be
requested
by
the
31
administrative
rules
review
committee
or
the
governor’s
32
administrative
rules
coordinator.
33
The
second
analysis
requires
a
cost-benefit
analysis
on
34
specific
subjects
relating
to
regulation.
A
proposed
rule
35
-3-
LSB
1612HH
(3)
84
jr/rj
3/
4
H.F.
90
cannot
be
adopted
until
the
analysis
is
complete;
if
the
rule
1
has
been
filed
“emergency”,
the
analysis
must
be
prepared
2
within
70
days
of
the
request.
The
regulatory
analysis
must
3
include
quantifications
of
the
data
to
the
extent
practicable
4
and
must
take
account
of
both
short-term
and
long-term
5
consequences.
The
request
for
this
analysis
may
be
made
by
6
the
administrative
rules
review
committee,
the
administrative
7
rules
coordinator,
at
least
25
persons
signing
that
request
8
who
each
are
licensees
of
the
profession
or
by
an
organization
9
representing
at
least
25
such
persons.
10
-4-
LSB
1612HH
(3)
84
jr/rj
4/
4