Senate Study Bill 1181 



                                       SENATE FILE       
                                       BY  (PROPOSED COMMITTEE ON
                                            HUMAN RESOURCES BILL
                                            BY CHAIRPERSON RAGAN)


    Passed Senate, Date               Passed House,  Date             
    Vote:  Ayes        Nays           Vote:  Ayes        Nays         
                 Approved                            

                                      A BILL FOR

  1 An Act relating to the Iowa Indian child welfare Act.
  2 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA:
  3 TLSB 2157XC 83
  4 jp/rj/8

PAG LIN



  1  1    Section 1.  Section 232B.3, subsection 6, Code 2009, is
  1  2 amended to read as follows:
  1  3    6.  "Indian child" or "child" means an unmarried Indian
  1  4 person who is under eighteen years of age or a child who is
  1  5 under eighteen years of age that an Indian tribe identifies as
  1  6 a child of the tribe's community.
  1  7    Sec. 2.  Section 232B.9, subsections 1, 2, 5, and 6, Code
  1  8 2009, are amended to read as follows:
  1  9    1.  In any adoptive or other permanent placement of an
  1 10 Indian child, in the absence of good cause to the contrary,
  1 11 preference shall be given to a placement with one of the
  1 12 following, in descending priority order:
  1 13    a.  A member of the Indian child's family.
  1 14    b.  Other members of the Indian child's tribe.
  1 15    c.  Another Indian family.
  1 16    d.  A non=Indian family approved by the Indian child's
  1 17 tribe.
  1 18    e.  A non=Indian family that is committed to enabling the
  1 19 child to have extended family visitation and participation in
  1 20 the cultural and ceremonial events of the child's tribe.
  1 21    2.  An emergency removal, foster care, or preadoptive
  1 22 placement of an Indian child shall be in the least restrictive
  1 23 setting which most approximates a family situation and in
  1 24 which the child's special needs, if any, may be met.  The
  1 25 child shall also be placed within reasonable proximity to the
  1 26 child's home, taking into account any special needs of the
  1 27 child.  In any foster care or preadoptive placement, in the
  1 28 absence of good cause to the contrary, a preference shall be
  1 29 given to the child's placement with one of the following, in
  1 30 descending priority order:
  1 31    a.  A member of the child's extended family.
  1 32    b.  A foster home licensed, approved, or specified by the
  1 33 child's tribe.
  1 34    c.  An Indian foster home licensed or approved by an
  1 35 authorized non=Indian licensing authority.
  2  1    d.  A child foster care agency approved by an Indian tribe
  2  2 or operated by an Indian organization which has a program
  2  3 suitable to meet the Indian child's needs.
  2  4    e.  A non=Indian child foster care agency approved by the
  2  5 child's tribe.
  2  6    f.  A non=Indian family committed to enabling the child to
  2  7 have extended family visitation and participation in the
  2  8 cultural and ceremonial events of the child's tribe.
  2  9    5.  Notwithstanding the placement preferences listed in
  2 10 subsections 1 and 2, if a different order of placement
  2 11 preference is established by the child's tribe or in a binding
  2 12 agreement between the child's tribe and the state entered into
  2 13 pursuant to section 232B.11, in the absence of good cause to
  2 14 the contrary, the court or agency effecting the placement
  2 15 shall follow the order of preference established by the tribe
  2 16 or in the agreement.
  2 17    6.  As appropriate, the placement preference of the Indian
  2 18 child or parent shall be considered.  In applying the
  2 19 preferences, a consenting parent's request for anonymity shall
  2 20 also be given weight by the court or agency effecting the
  2 21 placement.  Unless there is clear and convincing evidence that
  2 22 placement within the order of preference applicable under
  2 23 subsection 1, 2, or 5 would be harmful to the Indian child,
  2 24 consideration of the preference of the Indian child or parent
  2 25 or a parent's request for anonymity shall not be a basis for
  2 26 placing an Indian child outside of the applicable order of
  2 27 preference.
  2 28                           EXPLANATION
  2 29    This bill relates to the Iowa Indian child welfare Act
  2 30 (Iowa ICWA) by amending provisions found to be
  2 31 unconstitutional by the Iowa supreme court.  Under Code
  2 32 section 232B.2, the purpose of the Iowa ICWA is to clarify
  2 33 state policies and procedures regarding implementation of the
  2 34 federal Indian Child Welfare Act (federal ICWA), enacted in
  2 35 1978.
  3  1    Code section 232B.3, defining the terms "Indian child" or
  3  2 "child", is amended to eliminate language that included a
  3  3 child who is under 18 years of age that an Indian tribe
  3  4 identifies as a child of the tribe's community.  Under the
  3  5 ruling, In the Interest of A.W. and S.W., Minor Children, 741
  3  6 N.W.2d 793 (2007), the court found that the inclusion of the
  3  7 language being eliminated by the bill expanded the scope of
  3  8 the Iowa ICWA beyond the group of children addressed by the
  3  9 federal ICWA, violating the equal protection clause of the
  3 10 United States Constitution and the equality provision of
  3 11 Article I, section 6, of the Iowa Constitution.
  3 12    Code section 232B.9 provisions, relating to preferences for
  3 13 adoption and other permanent placement, or emergency removal,
  3 14 foster care, or preadoptive placement, of an Indian child, are
  3 15 amended to allow a good cause exception to the specified
  3 16 placement preferences.  Language is eliminated that provides
  3 17 that the consideration of the preference of the Indian child
  3 18 or the parent or a parent's request for anonymity cannot be
  3 19 used as the basis for deviating from the order of placement
  3 20 otherwise specified in the Iowa ICWA unless there is clear and
  3 21 convincing evidence that using the order of placement would be
  3 22 harmful to the Indian child.  Under the ruling, In the
  3 23 Interest of N.N.E., Minor Child, 725 N.W.2d 1 (2008), the
  3 24 court found that the federal ICWA allows the court to deviate
  3 25 for good cause from placement preferences and that the high
  3 26 burden in the Iowa ICWA to deviate from the placement
  3 27 preferences violates substantive due process rights.  Although
  3 28 the facts addressed in the ruling applied to a voluntary
  3 29 termination of parental rights, the court noted that the
  3 30 placement preferences in the Iowa ICWA also apply to emergency
  3 31 removal, foster care, and preadoptive placements.
  3 32 LSB 2157XC 83
  3 33 jp/rj/8