Senate File 317 - Introduced SENATE FILE BY RIELLY Passed Senate, Date Passed House, Date Vote: Ayes Nays Vote: Ayes Nays Approved A BILL FOR 1 An Act requiring a yearly review of legislation and current state 2 laws that contain health care benefit mandates and providing 3 an effective date. 4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA: 5 TLSB 2501SS 83 6 av/rj/8 PAG LIN 1 1 Section 1. NEW SECTION. 2.57 HEALTH CARE BENEFIT MANDATE 1 2 REVIEW. 1 3 1. DEFINITIONS. As used in this section, unless the 1 4 context otherwise requires: 1 5 a. "Carrier" means an entity subject to the insurance laws 1 6 and regulations of this state, or subject to the jurisdiction 1 7 of the commissioner, that contracts or offers to contract to 1 8 provide, deliver, arrange for, pay for, or reimburse any of 1 9 the costs of health care services, including an insurance 1 10 company offering sickness and accident plans, a health 1 11 maintenance organization, a nonprofit health service 1 12 corporation, an organized delivery system, or any other entity 1 13 that provides a plan, policy, or contract of health insurance, 1 14 health benefits, or health services. 1 15 b. "Commissioner" means the commissioner of insurance. 1 16 c. "Mandated health care benefit" means coverage that is 1 17 required to be provided or required to be offered in an 1 18 individual or group hospital or health care service plan, 1 19 policy, or contract by a proposal in a bill or joint 1 20 resolution or in an existing state law that requires such a 1 21 plan, policy, or contract to do any of the following: 1 22 (1) Provide coverage or increase the amount of coverage 1 23 for the treatment of a particular disease, condition, or other 1 24 health care need. 1 25 (2) Provide coverage or increase the amount of coverage of 1 26 a particular type of health care treatment or service, or of 1 27 equipment, supplies, or drugs used in connection with a health 1 28 care treatment or service. 1 29 (3) Provide coverage for health care delivered by a 1 30 specific type of provider. 1 31 2. PROPOSED MANDATED HEALTH CARE BENEFITS == EVALUATION 1 32 AND REPORT. 1 33 a. When the drafting of a bill or joint resolution is 1 34 requested, the legislative services agency shall make an 1 35 initial determination of whether the bill or joint resolution 2 1 contains a requirement for a mandated health care benefit. If 2 2 a mandated health care benefit may be required as a result of 2 3 the bill or joint resolution, that information shall be 2 4 contained in the explanation of the bill or joint resolution 2 5 and the bill or resolution shall be referred by the 2 6 legislative services agency to the commissioner for an 2 7 analysis of the proposed mandate. 2 8 b. Upon referral of such a bill or joint resolution to the 2 9 commissioner, the commissioner shall undertake a complete and 2 10 timely analysis of all ramifications of the proposed mandated 2 11 health care benefit and shall prepare a written report that 2 12 sets forth the commissioner's findings, evaluations, and 2 13 recommendations. The completed report shall be transmitted to 2 14 the general assembly and the governor and shall include a 2 15 financial impact analysis performed by an actuary who 2 16 certifies that the analysis is consistent with accepted 2 17 actuarial standards. The referral of a bill or joint 2 18 resolution to the commissioner pursuant to this section does 2 19 not prevent the general assembly from considering or enacting 2 20 the bill or joint resolution while the analysis is ongoing or 2 21 prior to transmittal of the written report. 2 22 c. The report shall include but is not limited to a review 2 23 and evaluation of all of the following, to the extent that the 2 24 information is available: 2 25 (1) Social impact, including all of the following: 2 26 (a) Extent to which the mandated health care benefit is 2 27 generally utilized by a significant portion of the population. 2 28 (b) Extent to which insurance coverage for the mandated 2 29 health care benefit is generally available, and if not, the 2 30 extent to which lack of coverage results in persons foregoing 2 31 necessary health care or results in unreasonable financial 2 32 hardship. 2 33 (c) Level of public demand for the mandated health care 2 34 benefit. 2 35 (d) Level of public demand for insurance coverage of the 3 1 mandated health care benefit. 3 2 (2) Medical impact, including all of the following: 3 3 (a) Extent to which the mandated health care benefit is 3 4 recognized by the appropriate recognized health care specialty 3 5 society as being an effective treatment. 3 6 (b) Extent to which the mandated health care benefit is 3 7 recognized by the appropriate health care specialty society as 3 8 being an effective treatment as demonstrated by a review of 3 9 scientific and peer=reviewed literature. 3 10 (c) Extent to which the mandated health care benefit is 3 11 available and is utilized by health care providers. 3 12 (d) Extent to which the mandated health care benefit makes 3 13 a positive contribution to the health status of the 3 14 population, including the ramifications of using alternatives 3 15 to the mandated health care benefit or not providing the 3 16 mandated health care benefit. 3 17 (e) Extent to which the mandated health care benefit would 3 18 diminish or eliminate access to currently available health 3 19 care services. 3 20 (3) Financial impact, including all of the following: 3 21 (a) Extent to which coverage of the mandated health care 3 22 benefit will increase or decrease the cost of a treatment or 3 23 service. 3 24 (b) Extent to which coverage of the mandated health care 3 25 benefit will increase the appropriate use of a treatment or 3 26 service. 3 27 (c) Extent to which the mandated health care benefit will 3 28 serve as an alternative to a more expensive treatment or 3 29 service. 3 30 (d) Extent to which coverage of the mandated health care 3 31 benefit will increase or decrease the administrative expenses 3 32 of insurers and the premium and administrative expenses of 3 33 policyholders. 3 34 (e) Impact of coverage of the mandated health care benefit 3 35 on the total cost of health care. 4 1 3. EXISTING MANDATED HEALTH CARE BENEFITS == EVALUATION 4 2 AND REPORT. The commissioner shall annually conduct an 4 3 evaluation of mandated health care benefits that are currently 4 4 required under state law that includes a financial impact 4 5 analysis performed by an actuary who certifies that the 4 6 analysis is consistent with accepted actuarial standards. The 4 7 evaluation shall include but is not limited to all of the 4 8 following: 4 9 a. An assessment of the full cost of each existing 4 10 mandated health care benefit as a percentage of the state's 4 11 average annual wage and premiums under each of the following: 4 12 (1) A typical individual and group health benefit plan, 4 13 policy, or contract in the state. 4 14 (2) A typical state employee health benefit plan. 4 15 (3) The comprehensive plan developed by the Iowa 4 16 comprehensive health insurance association under chapter 514E. 4 17 b. An assessment of the degree to which existing mandated 4 18 health care benefits are covered in self=funded insurance 4 19 plans. 4 20 c. A comparison of mandated health care benefits in Iowa 4 21 with those required in Nebraska, Minnesota, Missouri, and 4 22 Wisconsin which includes but is not limited to all of the 4 23 following: 4 24 (1) The number of mandated health care benefits in each 4 25 state. 4 26 (2) The type of mandated health care benefits required in 4 27 each state. 4 28 (3) The level and extent of coverage required for each 4 29 mandated health care benefit in each state. 4 30 (4) The financial impact of differences in levels of 4 31 required coverage for each mandated health care benefit in 4 32 each state. 4 33 4. CONTRACTUAL SERVICES. The commissioner may contract 4 34 for actuarial services and any other professional services as 4 35 necessary to carry out the requirements of this section. 5 1 5. ANNUAL REPORT. On or before December 31, 2009, and 5 2 each December 31 thereafter, the commissioner shall submit a 5 3 report to the general assembly and the governor that includes 5 4 its findings as to any bill or joint resolution that has been 5 5 referred to the commissioner in the previous year as provided 5 6 in subsection 2, and as to existing mandated health care 5 7 benefits under state law as provided in subsection 3. The 5 8 report shall also include recommendations to the general 5 9 assembly and the governor concerning decision=making criteria 5 10 which may be employed to reduce the number of mandated health 5 11 care benefits or the extent of coverage. 5 12 Sec. 2. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Act, being deemed of 5 13 immediate importance, takes effect upon enactment. 5 14 EXPLANATION 5 15 This bill creates new Code section 2.57 requiring a yearly 5 16 review of legislation and current state laws that contain 5 17 mandated health care benefits by the commissioner of 5 18 insurance. 5 19 The bill provides that when a bill or joint resolution is 5 20 requested, the legislative services agency shall make a 5 21 determination of whether the bill or resolution contains a 5 22 requirement for a mandated health care benefit, and if so, 5 23 shall include that information in the explanation. The 5 24 legislative services agency is then required to refer the bill 5 25 or resolution to the commissioner for analysis and issuance of 5 26 a report to the general assembly and the governor with the 5 27 commissioner's findings, evaluations, and recommendations 5 28 concerning the proposed mandated health care benefit. The 5 29 report must include a financial impact analysis performed by 5 30 an actuary who certifies that the analysis is consistent with 5 31 accepted actuarial standards. 5 32 The bill specifies that the commissioner's review of 5 33 proposed legislation shall include a number of factors 5 34 including the social, medical, and financial impacts of 5 35 enacting the proposed mandated health care benefit. The 6 1 referral of a bill or resolution to the commissioner does not 6 2 prevent the general assembly from considering or enacting the 6 3 legislation while the analysis is ongoing or prior to 6 4 transmittal of the written report. 6 5 The bill also requires the commissioner to conduct an 6 6 annual evaluation of all mandated health care benefits that 6 7 are currently required under state law and specifies a number 6 8 of factors that should be contained in the evaluation, 6 9 including a comparison of mandated health care benefits in 6 10 neighboring states. This analysis must also include a 6 11 financial impact analysis performed by an actuary who 6 12 certifies that the analysis is consistent with accepted 6 13 actuarial standards. 6 14 The commissioner is authorized to contract for actuarial 6 15 services and any other professional services as necessary to 6 16 carry out the requirements of the bill. On or before December 6 17 31, 2009, and each December 31 thereafter, the commissioner is 6 18 required to submit a report to the general assembly and the 6 19 governor that includes its findings as to any bill or joint 6 20 resolution containing a proposed mandated health care benefit 6 21 that has been referred to the commissioner in the previous 6 22 year and as to existing mandated health care benefits required 6 23 by Iowa law. The report shall also include recommendations 6 24 concerning decision=making criteria which may be employed to 6 25 reduce the number of mandated health care benefits or the 6 26 extent of coverage. 6 27 The bill is effective upon enactment. 6 28 LSB 2501SS 83 6 29 av/rj/8