House Study Bill 236



                                       HOUSE FILE       
                                       BY  (PROPOSED COMMITTEE ON
                                            JUDICIARY BILL BY
                                            CHAIRPERSON PAULSEN)


    Passed House, Date               Passed Senate,  Date             
    Vote:  Ayes        Nays           Vote:  Ayes        Nays         
                 Approved                            

                                      A BILL FOR

  1 An Act authorizing the appointment of an attorney to represent an
  2    indigent parole violator, and providing effective and
  3    retroactive applicability date provisions.
  4 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA:
  5 TLSB 3054HC 81
  6 jm/cf/24

PAG LIN



  1  1                      STATE PUBLIC DEFENDER
  1  2    Section 1.  Section 13B.4, subsection 1, Code 2005, is
  1  3 amended to read as follows:
  1  4    1.  The state public defender shall coordinate the
  1  5 provision of legal representation of all indigents under
  1  6 arrest or charged with a crime, seeking postconviction relief,
  1  7 against whom a contempt action is pending, in proceedings
  1  8 under section 811.1A or chapter 229A or 812, in juvenile
  1  9 proceedings, on appeal in criminal cases, and on appeal in
  1 10 proceedings to obtain postconviction relief when ordered to do
  1 11 so by the district court in which the judgment or order was
  1 12 issued, and on a reopening of a sentence proceeding, and may
  1 13 provide for the representation of indigents in proceedings
  1 14 instituted pursuant to section 908.11 chapter 908.  The state
  1 15 public defender shall not engage in the private practice of
  1 16 law.
  1 17    Sec. 2.  Section 602.8102, subsection 133, Code 2005, is
  1 18 amended by striking the subsection.
  1 19    Sec. 3.  Section 815.10, subsection 1, Code 2005, is
  1 20 amended to read as follows:
  1 21    1.  The court, for cause and upon its own motion or upon
  1 22 application by an indigent person or a public defender, shall
  1 23 appoint the state public defender's designee pursuant to
  1 24 section 13B.4 to represent an indigent person at any stage of
  1 25 the criminal, postconviction, contempt, commitment under
  1 26 chapter 229A, detention under section 811.1A, competency under
  1 27 chapter 812, parole revocation if applicable under section
  1 28 908.2A, or juvenile proceedings or on appeal of any criminal,
  1 29 postconviction, contempt, commitment under chapter 229A,
  1 30 detention under section 811.1A, competency under chapter 812,
  1 31 parole revocation under chapter 908, or juvenile action in
  1 32 which the indigent person is entitled to legal assistance at
  1 33 public expense.  However, in juvenile cases, the court may
  1 34 directly appoint an existing nonprofit corporation established
  1 35 for and engaged in the provision of legal services for
  2  1 juveniles.  An appointment shall not be made unless the person
  2  2 is determined to be indigent under section 815.9.  Only one
  2  3 attorney shall be appointed in all cases, except that in class
  2  4 "A" felony cases the court may appoint two attorneys.
  2  5    Sec. 4.  Section 815.11, Code 2005, is amended to read as
  2  6 follows:
  2  7    815.11  APPROPRIATIONS FOR INDIGENT DEFENSE.
  2  8    Costs incurred under chapter 229A, 665, or 822, or 908, or
  2  9 section 232.141, subsection 3, paragraph "c", or section
  2 10 598.23A, 814.9, 814.10, 814.11, 815.4, 815.7, or 815.10, or
  2 11 908.11 on behalf of an indigent shall be paid from funds
  2 12 appropriated by the general assembly to the office of the
  2 13 state public defender in the department of inspections and
  2 14 appeals for those purposes.  Costs incurred representing an
  2 15 indigent defendant in a contempt action, or representing an
  2 16 indigent juvenile in a juvenile court proceeding under chapter
  2 17 600, are also payable from these funds.  However, costs
  2 18 incurred in any administrative proceeding or in any other
  2 19 proceeding under chapter 598, 600, 600A, 633, or 915 or other
  2 20 provisions of the Code or administrative rules are not payable
  2 21 from these funds.
  2 22    Sec. 5.  Section 908.2, Code 2005, is amended to read as
  2 23 follows:
  2 24    908.2  INITIAL APPEARANCE == BAIL.
  2 25    1.  An officer making an arrest of an alleged parole
  2 26 violator shall take the arrested person before a magistrate
  2 27 without unnecessary delay for an initial appearance.  At that
  2 28 time the alleged parole violator shall be furnished with a the
  2 29 initial appearance the magistrate shall do all of the
  2 30 following:
  2 31    a.  Provide written notice of the claimed violation and
  2 32 shall be given.
  2 33    b.  Provide notice that a parole revocation hearing will
  2 34 take place and that its purpose is to determine whether the
  2 35 alleged parole violation occurred and whether the alleged
  3  1 violator's parole should be revoked.
  3  2    c.  Advise the alleged parole violator of the right to
  3  3 request an appointed attorney.
  3  4    2.  The magistrate may order the alleged parole violator
  3  5 confined in the county jail or may order the alleged parole
  3  6 violator released on bail under terms and conditions as the
  3  7 magistrate may require.  Admittance to bail is discretionary
  3  8 with the magistrate and is not a matter of right.  A person
  3  9 for whom bail is set may make application for amendment of
  3 10 bail to a district judge or district associate judge having
  3 11 jurisdiction to amend the order.  The motion shall be promptly
  3 12 set for hearing and a record shall be made of the hearing.
  3 13    Sec. 6.  NEW SECTION.  908.2A  APPOINTMENT OF AN ATTORNEY.
  3 14    1.  An attorney may be appointed to represent an alleged
  3 15 parole violator in a parole revocation proceeding only if all
  3 16 of the following criteria apply:
  3 17    a.  The alleged parole violator requests appointment of an
  3 18 attorney.
  3 19    b.  The alleged parole violator is determined to be
  3 20 indigent as defined in section 815.9.
  3 21    c.  The appointing authority determines each of the
  3 22 following:
  3 23    (1)  The alleged parole violator lacks skill or education
  3 24 and would have difficulty presenting the alleged parole
  3 25 violator's case, particularly if the proceeding would require
  3 26 the cross=examination of witnesses or would require the
  3 27 submission or examination of complex documentary evidence.
  3 28    (2)  The alleged parole violator has a colorable claim the
  3 29 alleged violation did not occur, or there are substantial
  3 30 reasons that justify or mitigate the violation and make any
  3 31 revocation inappropriate under the circumstances.
  3 32    2.  If all of the criteria apply in subsection 1, a
  3 33 contract attorney with the state public defender may be
  3 34 appointed to represent the alleged parole violator.  If a
  3 35 contract attorney is unavailable, an attorney who has agreed
  4  1 to provide these services may be appointed.  The appointed
  4  2 attorney shall apply to the state public defender for payment
  4  3 in the manner prescribed by the state public defender.
  4  4    Sec. 7.  Section 908.4, subsection 2, Code 2005, is amended
  4  5 to read as follows:
  4  6    2.  The administrative parole judge shall make a verbatim
  4  7 record of the proceedings.  The alleged violator shall not
  4  8 have the right to appointed counsel, shall be informed of the
  4  9 evidence against the violator, shall be given an opportunity
  4 10 to be heard, shall have the right to present witnesses and
  4 11 other evidence, and shall have the right to cross=examine
  4 12 adverse witnesses, except if the judge finds that a witness
  4 13 would be subjected to risk or harm if the witness's identity
  4 14 were disclosed.  The revocation hearing may be conducted
  4 15 electronically.
  4 16    Sec. 8.  Section 815.1, Code 2005, is repealed.
  4 17    Sec. 9.  EFFECTIVE DATE AND RETROACTIVE APPLICABILITY.
  4 18 This Act, being deemed of immediate importance, takes effect
  4 19 upon enactment, and applies retroactively to November 10,
  4 20 2004.
  4 21                           EXPLANATION
  4 22    This bill authorizes the appointment by an administrative
  4 23 law judge or the court of an attorney at state expense for an
  4 24 indigent parole violator.
  4 25    The bill, in response to the Iowa supreme court case
  4 26 Pfister v. Iowa District Court for Polk County, requires that
  4 27 an alleged parole violator be informed of the right to request
  4 28 an attorney for any parole revocation proceeding, and under
  4 29 certain circumstances requires that an attorney be appointed
  4 30 to represent the alleged parole violator during such
  4 31 proceedings.  The law prior to Pfister prohibited the court
  4 32 appointment of an attorney on behalf of an indigent parole
  4 33 violator.
  4 34    Under the bill, an alleged parole violator may be appointed
  4 35 an attorney if all of the following apply:  the alleged
  5  1 violator requests the appointment of an attorney; the alleged
  5  2 violator is indigent; the alleged violator lacks the education
  5  3 or skill to present the alleged violator's case or the case
  5  4 requires the submission or examination of complex documentary
  5  5 evidence; and the alleged violator has a colorable claim the
  5  6 violation did not occur or there are substantial reasons which
  5  7 justify or mitigate any parole revocation.
  5  8    The bill also authorizes payment from the indigent defense
  5  9 fund in Code section 815.11 to appointed attorneys
  5 10 representing indigent parole violators.  Current law under
  5 11 Pfister authorizes payment for the representation of an
  5 12 indigent parole violator from the general fund of the state.
  5 13    The bill also repeals Code section 815.1 because the
  5 14 substance of the section is now included in the references to
  5 15 parole revocations in Code sections 815.10 and 815.11.
  5 16    The bill takes effect upon enactment and applies
  5 17 retroactively to November 10, 2004, the date the supreme court
  5 18 decided Pfister v. Iowa District Court for Polk County.
  5 19 LSB 3054HC 81
  5 20 jm:rj/cf/24