Senate File 124

                                       SENATE FILE       
                                       BY  HOUSER


    Passed Senate,  Date               Passed House, Date             
    Vote:  Ayes        Nays           Vote:  Ayes        Nays         
                 Approved                            

                                      A BILL FOR

  1 An Act relating to local government financing, including local
  2    government fiscal reform, authority for bonding, and the
  3    percentage of actual value at which residential property is
  4    assessed, and including a retroactive applicability date
  5    provision.
  6 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA:
  7 TLSB 2134SS 80
  8 sc/cl/14

PAG LIN

  1  1    Section 1.  Section 25B.2, subsection 3, Code 2003, is
  1  2 amended by striking the subsection.
  1  3    Sec. 2.  NEW SECTION.  25B.5A  UNFUNDED STATE MANDATES ==
  1  4 EFFECT.
  1  5    If, on or after July 1, 2003, a state mandate is enacted by
  1  6 the general assembly, or otherwise imposed, on a political
  1  7 subdivision and the state mandate requires a political
  1  8 subdivision to engage in any new activity, to provide a new
  1  9 service, or to provide any service beyond that required by any
  1 10 law enacted prior to July 1, 2003, and the state does not
  1 11 appropriate moneys to fully fund the cost of the state mandate
  1 12 as identified pursuant to section 25B.5, subsections 1 and 2,
  1 13 the political subdivision is not required to perform the
  1 14 activity or provide the service and the political subdivision
  1 15 shall not be subject to any liabilities imposed by the state
  1 16 or the imposition of any fines or penalties for the failure to
  1 17 comply with the state mandate.
  1 18    Sec. 3.  NEW SECTION.  331.404  COUNTY FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
  1 19 PLAN.
  1 20    Each county shall prepare a financial management plan for
  1 21 the county for use in budget planning.  The financial
  1 22 management plan shall contain a set of financial policies for
  1 23 use by counties in budget planning.  The county financial
  1 24 management plan shall be prepared in a manner which will
  1 25 assist counties in identifying budgeting goals, fiscal and
  1 26 service planning strategies, and revenue targets.  County
  1 27 financial management planning shall be completed on forms
  1 28 prepared by the department of management and approved by the
  1 29 county finance committee in consultation with the Iowa state
  1 30 association of county supervisors, the Iowa state association
  1 31 of county auditors, and the public.
  1 32    Copies of the financial management plan for a county shall
  1 33 be maintained as a public record at the county auditor's
  1 34 office and shall be filed with the state appeal board in the
  1 35 same manner and at the same time that certified budgets are
  2  1 filed under section 24.17.
  2  2    Sec. 4.  NEW SECTION.  331.423A  ENDING FUND BALANCE.
  2  3    1.  Effective for a fiscal year beginning on or after July
  2  4 1, 2009, budgeted ending fund balances shall not exceed
  2  5 twenty=five percent of actual expenditures in the previous
  2  6 fiscal year for either the general fund or the rural services
  2  7 fund.  An ending fund balance does not include funds reserved
  2  8 or designated for a specific purpose and specifically
  2  9 described in the certified budget.
  2 10    2.  A county shall not exceed a balance greater than five
  2 11 percentage points above the twenty=five percent fund balance
  2 12 limitation in subsection 1.  If a county exceeds the
  2 13 limitation in this subsection, in the second budget year
  2 14 following the fiscal year that shows a fund balance exceeding
  2 15 the limitation in this subsection, the county shall implement
  2 16 a levy reduction formula to offset the excess fund balance.
  2 17    Sec. 5.  Section 331.441, subsection 2, Code 2003, is
  2 18 amended by adding the following new paragraph:
  2 19    NEW PARAGRAPH.  d.  "Rural general obligation bond" means a
  2 20 negotiable bond issued by a county and payable from the levy
  2 21 of ad valorem taxes on all taxable property located outside
  2 22 the incorporated areas of the county through its debt service
  2 23 fund which is required to be established by section 331.430.
  2 24    Sec. 6.  NEW SECTION.  331.450  RURAL DEBT SERVICE.
  2 25    The county board of supervisors may direct the county
  2 26 auditor to establish a rural debt service tax district for the
  2 27 purpose of issuing general obligation bonds for rural county
  2 28 services.  The rural debt service tax district shall include
  2 29 only unincorporated portions of the county.  The county's debt
  2 30 service tax levy for the rural general obligation bonds shall
  2 31 be levied only against taxable property within the county
  2 32 which is included within the boundaries of the rural debt
  2 33 service tax district.  The board may issue rural general
  2 34 obligation bonds for general county purposes and essential
  2 35 county purposes if such stated purpose is primarily intended
  3  1 to benefit those persons residing in the county outside of
  3  2 incorporated city areas.  Rural general obligation bonds for
  3  3 the purposes described in this section are subject to an
  3  4 election held in the manner provided in section 331.442,
  3  5 subsections 1 through 4, except that only those registered
  3  6 voters residing within the rural service area tax district may
  3  7 vote on the proposition.
  3  8    Sec. 7.  NEW SECTION.  331.451  LOANS TO CITIES.
  3  9    A county may enter into a 28E agreement with one or more
  3 10 cities to finance in whole or in part one or more projects
  3 11 meeting the definition of a city essential corporate purpose
  3 12 or city general corporate purpose.  The agreement may provide
  3 13 for issuance of general obligation bonds by the county the
  3 14 proceeds from which will be loaned to the city to finance such
  3 15 a city project.  The county may require that the repayment
  3 16 obligation of a city be secured as the county deems
  3 17 appropriate.  The repayment obligation may be evidenced by one
  3 18 or more notes of a borrowing city.  The loan agreements may
  3 19 contain terms and conditions the county deems advisable.
  3 20    The county may provide in the resolution authorizing the
  3 21 issuance of bonds that the principal and interest on the bonds
  3 22 are payable exclusively from any of the following:
  3 23    1.  The income and receipts or other money derived from the
  3 24 project financed with the proceeds of the bonds.
  3 25    2.  The income and receipts or other money derived from
  3 26 designated projects whether or not the projects are financed
  3 27 in whole or in part with the proceeds of the bonds or notes.
  3 28    3.  A debt service property tax levy imposed by the city on
  3 29 the taxable property in the city.
  3 30    4.  Tax incremental revenues if the project is located in
  3 31 an urban renewal area.  The county may require that a city
  3 32 create an urban renewal area to collect incremental tax
  3 33 revenues to secure the loan.
  3 34    Bonds proposed to be issued under this section are subject
  3 35 to an election held in the manner provided in section 331.442,
  4  1 subsections 1 through 4.
  4  2    Sec. 8.  Section 441.21, Code 2003, is amended by adding
  4  3 the following new subsection:
  4  4    NEW SUBSECTION.  5A.  For valuations established as of
  4  5 January 1, 2003, and for subsequent years, if the percentage
  4  6 of actual value at which residential property is to be
  4  7 assessed as computed under subsection 5 is less than fifty
  4  8 percent, the percentage of actual value at which residential
  4  9 property shall be assessed shall be fifty percent
  4 10 notwithstanding the computation under subsection 5.
  4 11    Sec. 9.  RETROACTIVE APPLICABILITY.  The section of this
  4 12 Act amending section 441.21 applies retroactively to
  4 13 assessment years beginning on or after January 1, 2003.
  4 14                           EXPLANATION
  4 15    This bill makes a number of changes relating to local
  4 16 government fiscal reform.
  4 17    The bill provides that if a new state mandate is imposed on
  4 18 or after July 1, 2003, which requires the performance of a new
  4 19 activity or service or the expansion of a service beyond what
  4 20 was required before July 1, 2003, the state mandate must be
  4 21 fully funded.  If the state mandate is not fully funded, the
  4 22 affected political subdivisions are not required to comply or
  4 23 implement the state mandate.  Also, no fines or penalties may
  4 24 be imposed on a political subdivision for failure to comply or
  4 25 carry out an unfunded state mandate.
  4 26    The bill strikes Code section 25B.2, subsection 3, and
  4 27 rewrites it as a new section outside the intent section of
  4 28 Code chapter 25B.  The rewritten section removes a qualifying
  4 29 phrase which limits the circumstances under which a political
  4 30 subdivision may fail to carry out an unfunded state mandate.
  4 31    The bill requires counties to annually prepare a financial
  4 32 management plan to be filed with the state at the same time
  4 33 that the certified budget is filed.  The purpose of the plan
  4 34 is to set forth a set of financial policies for use by
  4 35 counties in budget planning.
  5  1    The bill limits the ending general fund and rural services
  5  2 fund balances of a county to 25 percent of actual expenditures
  5  3 from each fund in the previous fiscal year.  However, the bill
  5  4 provides that if the ending fund balance exceeds five
  5  5 percentage points above 25 percent, the county shall implement
  5  6 a levy reduction formula in the following fiscal year to
  5  7 offset the excess fund balance.  The limitation applies to
  5  8 fiscal years beginning on or after July 1, 2009.
  5  9    The bill allows a county to issue rural general obligation
  5 10 bonds payable from property taxes levied in the unincorporated
  5 11 areas of the county.  The bonds are subject to the election
  5 12 requirements for countywide general obligation bonds.
  5 13    The bill also allows a county to issue general obligation
  5 14 bonds and loan the proceeds of the bonds to one or more cities
  5 15 to finance a city project.  The bonds are subject to the
  5 16 election requirements for countywide general obligation bonds.
  5 17    The bill sets the percentage (rollback) of the actual value
  5 18 at which residential property is to be taxed at not less than
  5 19 50 percent for valuations established as of January 1, 2003,
  5 20 and for subsequent years.  This provision of the bill applies
  5 21 retroactively to assessment years beginning on or after
  5 22 January 1, 2003.
  5 23 LSB 2134SS 80
  5 24 sc/cl/14