Senate
File
302
-
Enrolled
Senate
File
302
AN
ACT
RELATING
TO
MOTOR
VEHICLES
OPERATED
BY
AN
AUTOMATED
DRIVING
SYSTEM,
AND
MAKING
PENALTIES
APPLICABLE.
BE
IT
ENACTED
BY
THE
GENERAL
ASSEMBLY
OF
THE
STATE
OF
IOWA:
Section
1.
NEW
SECTION
.
321.514
Definitions.
As
used
in
this
section
and
sections
321.515
through
321.519,
unless
the
context
otherwise
requires:
1.
“Automated
driving
system”
means
the
hardware
and
software
collectively
capable
of
performing
the
entire
dynamic
driving
task
on
a
sustained
basis,
regardless
of
whether
the
system
is
limited
to
a
specific
operational
design
domain,
if
any.
2.
“Conventional
human
driver”
means
a
natural
person
who
manually
controls
the
in-vehicle
accelerating,
braking,
steering,
and
transmission
gear
selection
input
devices
in
order
to
operate
a
motor
vehicle.
3.
“Driverless-capable
vehicle”
means
a
system-equipped
vehicle
capable
of
performing
the
entire
dynamic
driving
task
within
the
automated
driving
system’s
operational
design
domain,
if
any,
including
but
not
limited
to
achievement
of
a
minimal
risk
condition
without
intervention
or
supervision
by
a
conventional
human
driver.
4.
“Dynamic
driving
task”
means
all
real-time
operational
and
tactical
functions
required
to
operate
a
motor
vehicle
on
a
highway
in
traffic
within
an
automated
driving
system’s
specific
operational
design
domain,
if
any.
“Dynamic
driving
Senate
File
302,
p.
2
task”
does
not
include
any
strategic
function
such
as
trip
scheduling
or
the
selection
of
destinations
and
waypoints.
5.
“Minimal
risk
condition”
means
a
reasonably
safe
state
to
which
an
automated
driving
system
brings
a
system-equipped
vehicle
upon
experiencing
a
performance-relevant
failure
of
the
system
that
renders
the
system
unable
to
perform
the
entire
dynamic
driving
task,
including
but
not
limited
to
removing
the
vehicle
to
the
nearest
shoulder
if
the
vehicle
is
capable
of
doing
so,
bringing
the
vehicle
to
a
complete
stop,
and
activating
the
vehicle’s
emergency
signal
lamps.
6.
“On-demand
driverless-capable
vehicle
network”
means
a
transportation
service
network
that
uses
a
software
application
or
other
digital
means
to
dispatch
driverless-capable
vehicles
for
the
purposes
of
transporting
persons
or
goods,
including
transportation
for
hire
as
defined
in
section
325A.1,
and
public
transportation.
7.
“Operational
design
domain”
means
a
set
of
constraints
used
to
define
the
domain
under
which
an
automated
driving
system
is
designed
to
properly
operate,
including
but
not
limited
to
types
of
highways,
speed
ranges,
environmental
conditions
such
as
weather
or
time
of
day,
and
other
constraints.
8.
“System-equipped
vehicle”
means
a
motor
vehicle
equipped
with
an
automated
driving
system.
Sec.
2.
NEW
SECTION
.
321.515
Operation.
1.
A
driverless-capable
vehicle
may
operate
on
the
public
highways
of
this
state
without
a
conventional
human
driver
physically
present
in
the
vehicle,
if
the
vehicle
meets
all
of
the
following
conditions:
a.
The
vehicle
is
capable
of
achieving
a
minimal
risk
condition
if
a
malfunction
of
the
automated
driving
system
occurs
that
renders
the
system
unable
to
perform
the
entire
dynamic
driving
task
within
the
system’s
intended
operational
design
domain,
if
any.
b.
While
in
driverless
operation,
the
vehicle
is
capable
of
operating
in
compliance
with
the
applicable
traffic
and
motor
vehicle
safety
laws
and
regulations
of
this
state
that
govern
the
performance
of
the
dynamic
driving
task,
unless
an
exemption
has
been
granted
to
the
vehicle
by
the
department.
Senate
File
302,
p.
3
c.
The
vehicle
has
been
certified
by
the
vehicle’s
manufacturer
to
be
in
compliance
with
all
applicable
federal
motor
vehicle
safety
standards,
except
to
the
extent
an
exemption
has
been
granted
for
the
vehicle
under
applicable
federal
law
or
by
the
national
highway
traffic
safety
administration.
2.
a.
The
operation
of
a
system-equipped
vehicle
capable
of
performing
the
entire
dynamic
driving
task
within
the
automated
driving
system’s
operational
design
domain
on
the
public
highways
of
this
state
while
a
conventional
human
driver
is
present
in
the
vehicle
shall
be
lawful.
During
such
operation,
the
conventional
human
driver
shall
possess
a
valid
driver’s
license
pursuant
to
section
321.174
and
shall
be
subject
to
the
financial
liability
coverage
requirements
and
penalties
set
forth
under
section
321.20B.
The
conventional
human
driver
shall
operate
the
system-equipped
vehicle
according
to
the
manufacturer’s
requirements
and
specifications,
and
shall
regain
manual
control
of
the
vehicle
when
prompted
by
the
automated
driving
system.
b.
An
automated
driving
system,
while
engaged,
shall
be
designed
to
operate
within
the
system’s
operational
design
domain
in
compliance
with
the
applicable
traffic
and
motor
vehicle
safety
laws
and
regulations
of
this
state
that
govern
the
performance
of
the
dynamic
driving
task,
unless
an
exemption
has
been
granted
to
the
vehicle
by
the
department.
3.
Except
as
provided
in
this
section,
the
motor
vehicle
laws
of
this
state
shall
not
be
construed
to
require
a
conventional
human
driver
to
operate
a
driverless-capable
vehicle
that
is
being
operated
by
an
automated
driving
system.
The
automated
driving
system,
while
engaged,
shall
be
deemed
to
fulfill
any
physical
acts
required
of
a
conventional
human
driver
to
perform
the
dynamic
driving
task.
Sec.
3.
NEW
SECTION
.
321.516
Insurance.
Before
a
system-equipped
vehicle
is
allowed
to
operate
on
the
public
highways
of
this
state,
the
owner
shall
obtain
financial
liability
coverage
for
the
vehicle.
A
system-equipped
vehicle
shall
not
operate
on
the
highways
of
this
state
unless
financial
liability
coverage
is
in
effect
for
the
vehicle
and
unless
proof
of
financial
liability
coverage
is
Senate
File
302,
p.
4
carried
in
the
vehicle
pursuant
to
section
321.20B.
Sec.
4.
NEW
SECTION
.
321.517
Accidents.
In
the
event
of
an
accident
in
which
a
system-equipped
vehicle
is
involved,
the
vehicle
shall
remain
at
the
scene
of
the
accident
and
the
operation
of
the
vehicle
shall
otherwise
comply
with
sections
321.261
through
321.273
where
applicable
and
to
the
extent
possible,
and
the
vehicle’s
owner
or
a
person
on
behalf
of
the
vehicle’s
owner
shall
promptly
report
the
accident
to
law
enforcement
authorities.
If
a
system-equipped
vehicle
fails
to
remain
at
the
scene
of
an
accident
or
the
operation
of
the
vehicle
fails
to
otherwise
comply
with
sections
321.261
through
321.273
where
applicable
and
to
the
extent
possible
as
required
by
this
section,
the
vehicle’s
failure
shall
be
imputed
to
the
vehicle’s
owner,
and
the
vehicle’s
owner
may
be
charged
and
convicted
of
a
violation
of
sections
321.261
through
321.273,
as
applicable.
Sec.
5.
NEW
SECTION
.
321.518
On-demand
driverless-capable
vehicle
network.
A
person
may
operate
an
on-demand
driverless-capable
vehicle
network.
An
on-demand
driverless-capable
vehicle
network
may
be
used
to
facilitate
the
transportation
of
persons
or
goods,
including
transportation
for
hire
as
defined
in
section
325A.1,
and
public
transportation.
An
on-demand
driverless-capable
vehicle
network
may
connect
passengers
to
driverless-capable
vehicles
either
exclusively
or
as
part
of
a
digital
network
that
also
connects
passengers
to
conventional
human
drivers
who
provide
transportation
services,
consistent
with
chapter
321N
or
any
other
applicable
laws,
in
vehicles
that
are
not
driverless-capable
vehicles.
Sec.
6.
NEW
SECTION
.
321.519
Authority.
1.
Automated
driving
systems
and
system-equipped
vehicles
shall
be
governed
by
sections
321.514
through
321.518,
this
section,
and
all
applicable
traffic
and
motor
vehicle
safety
laws
and
regulations
of
this
state.
Automated
driving
systems
and
system-equipped
vehicles
shall
be
regulated
exclusively
by
the
department.
The
department
may
adopt
rules
pursuant
to
chapter
17A
to
administer
sections
321.514
through
321.518,
and
this
section.
2.
A
political
subdivision
of
the
state
shall
not
impose
Senate
File
302,
p.
5
requirements,
including
but
not
limited
to
performance
standards,
specific
to
the
operation
of
system-equipped
vehicles,
automated
driving
systems,
or
on-demand
driverless-capable
vehicle
networks
that
are
in
addition
to
the
requirements
set
forth
under
sections
321.514
through
321.518.
A
political
subdivision
of
the
state
shall
not
impose
a
tax
on
system-equipped
vehicles,
automated
driving
systems,
or
on-demand
driverless-capable
vehicle
networks
where
such
tax
relates
specifically
to
the
operation
of
system-equipped
vehicles,
automated
driving
systems,
or
on-demand
driverless-capable
vehicle
networks.
______________________________
CHARLES
SCHNEIDER
President
of
the
Senate
______________________________
LINDA
UPMEYER
Speaker
of
the
House
I
hereby
certify
that
this
bill
originated
in
the
Senate
and
is
known
as
Senate
File
302,
Eighty-eighth
General
Assembly.
______________________________
W.
CHARLES
SMITHSON
Secretary
of
the
Senate
Approved
_______________,
2019
______________________________
KIM
REYNOLDS
Governor