House File 455 - Introduced



                                       HOUSE FILE       
                                       BY  KAUFMANN, ABDUL=SAMAD,
                                           SCHUELLER, and SANDS


    Passed House,  Date               Passed Senate, Date             
    Vote:  Ayes        Nays           Vote:  Ayes        Nays         
                 Approved                            

                                      A BILL FOR

  1 An Act relating to child custody and visitation.
  2 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA:
  3 TLSB 1673YH 83
  4 pf/nh/8

PAG LIN



  1  1    Section 1.  NEW SECTION.  256.47  EXTRACURRICULAR
  1  2 ACTIVITIES == CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE.
  1  3    A school=related extracurricular activity shall not be
  1  4 required for a student if it interferes with the custody
  1  5 arrangement of a student when the extracurricular activity is
  1  6 scheduled outside of regular school hours.  If a scheduled
  1  7 school=related extracurricular activity interferes with a
  1  8 noncustodial parent's custody arrangement, the parent shall
  1  9 notify an appropriate school official and the student shall be
  1 10 excused without penalty from attending the specific activity.
  1 11 This section does not apply to special events such as
  1 12 performances, games, and competitions.  For the purposes of
  1 13 this section, "school=related extracurricular activity" means
  1 14 an activity that takes place outside of regular school hours
  1 15 whether or not it is related to the student's academic
  1 16 curriculum.  The state board shall adopt rules relating to the
  1 17 implementation of this section.
  1 18    Sec. 2.  Section 598.21D, Code 2009, is amended to read as
  1 19 follows:
  1 20    598.21D  RELOCATION OF PARENT AS GROUNDS TO MODIFY ORDER OF
  1 21 CHILD CUSTODY == LEVEL OF CARE CONSIDERATION IN MODIFYING.
  1 22    1.  If a parent awarded joint legal custody and physical
  1 23 care or sole legal custody is relocating the residence of the
  1 24 minor child to a location which is one hundred fifty miles or
  1 25 more from the residence of the minor child at the time that
  1 26 custody was awarded, the court may consider the relocation a
  1 27 substantial change in circumstances.
  1 28    2.  If the court determines that the relocation is a
  1 29 substantial change in circumstances, in determining the best
  1 30 interest of the child, the court may modify an existing order
  1 31 that awarded joint legal custody and physical care to the
  1 32 relocating parent and instead award joint legal custody and
  1 33 physical care to the nonrelocating parent, if the court finds
  1 34 that, in regard to the level of care provided by each parent,
  1 35 the care provided by the nonrelocating parent is equal to the
  2  1 level of care provided by the relocating parent.  If the court
  2  2 modifies the order and awards joint legal custody and physical
  2  3 care to the nonrelocating parent, the court shall modify the
  2  4 custody order to, at a minimum, preserve, as nearly as
  2  5 possible, the existing relationship between the minor child
  2  6 and the relocating parent.  If modified, the order may include
  2  7 a provision for extended visitation during summer vacations
  2  8 and school breaks and scheduled telephone contact between the
  2  9 relocating parent and the minor child.  The modification may
  2 10 include a provision assigning the responsibility for
  2 11 transportation of the minor child for visitation purposes to
  2 12 either or both parents.
  2 13    3.  If the court determines that the relocation is a
  2 14 substantial change in circumstances, and the court modifies
  2 15 the custody order retaining the provisions of the order
  2 16 awarding joint legal custody and physical care or sole legal
  2 17 custody to the relocating parent, the court shall modify the
  2 18 custody order to, at a minimum, preserve, as nearly as
  2 19 possible, the existing relationship between the minor child
  2 20 and the nonrelocating parent.  If modified, the order may
  2 21 include a provision for extended visitation during summer
  2 22 vacations and school breaks and scheduled telephone contact
  2 23 between the nonrelocating parent and the minor child.  The
  2 24 modification may include a provision assigning the
  2 25 responsibility for transportation of the minor child for
  2 26 visitation purposes to either or both parents.
  2 27    4.  If the court makes a finding of past interference by
  2 28 the a parent awarded joint legal custody and physical care or
  2 29 sole legal custody with the minor child's access to the other
  2 30 parent, the court may order the posting of a cash bond to
  2 31 assure future compliance with the visitation provisions of the
  2 32 decree.  The supreme court shall prescribe guidelines for the
  2 33 forfeiting of the bond and restoration of the bond following
  2 34 forfeiting of the bond.
  2 35    Sec. 3.  Section 598.23, subsection 1, Code 2009, is
  3  1 amended to read as follows:
  3  2    1.  If a person against whom a temporary order or final
  3  3 decree has been entered willfully disobeys the order or
  3  4 decree, the person may be cited and punished by the court for
  3  5 contempt and be committed to the county jail for a period of
  3  6 time not to exceed thirty days for each offense.  The court
  3  7 may find that a person willfully disobeyed the order or decree
  3  8 and hold the person in contempt if the person is found to have
  3  9 unilaterally decided to deny visitation, as prescribed by the
  3 10 order or decree, in response to a non=life=threatening
  3 11 emergency.
  3 12    Sec. 4.  Section 598.41, Code 2009, is amended by adding
  3 13 the following new subsection:
  3 14    NEW SUBSECTION.  7A.  Unless the court finds that such a
  3 15 provision is not in the best interest of the child, in any
  3 16 custody order or decree in which the parents are awarded joint
  3 17 legal custody, the order or decree shall provide that each
  3 18 parent shall offer the other parent the opportunity for
  3 19 additional time with the child before making other
  3 20 arrangements for temporary care of the child if, during the
  3 21 time a parent is otherwise responsible for providing physical
  3 22 care of the child, the parent is unable to provide such
  3 23 physical care for a period of time exceeding eight consecutive
  3 24 hours.
  3 25                           EXPLANATION
  3 26    This bill includes provisions relating to custody and
  3 27 visitation of a child.
  3 28    The bill allows students to be excused from school-related
  3 29 extracurricular activities if the activity interferes with
  3 30 scheduled visitation with a noncustodial parent.  The bill
  3 31 requires that when a parent informs a school official of a
  3 32 conflict between an extracurricular activity scheduled outside
  3 33 regular school hours and the student's custody arrangement
  3 34 with a noncustodial parent, the student will be excused from
  3 35 the activity without penalty.  The bill provides exceptions
  4  1 for special events such as performances, games, and
  4  2 competitions.  The bill covers all school=related
  4  3 extracurricular activities, whether or not the activities are
  4  4 related to the student's academic curriculum.  The bill
  4  5 requires the state board of education to adopt rules that will
  4  6 enforce the bill.
  4  7    The bill amends provisions relating to relocation of a
  4  8 parent as grounds for modification of a child custody order.
  4  9 Current law provides that if a parent who has been awarded
  4 10 joint legal custody and physical care or sole legal custody is
  4 11 relocating the residence of the minor child to a location
  4 12 which is 150 miles or more from the residence of the minor
  4 13 child at the time that custody was awarded, the court may
  4 14 consider the relocation a substantial change in circumstances.
  4 15 The bill provides that if the court determines that the
  4 16 relocation is a substantial change in circumstances, in
  4 17 determining the best interest of the child, the court may
  4 18 modify the existing order that awarded joint legal custody and
  4 19 physical care to the relocating parent and instead award joint
  4 20 legal custody and physical care to the nonrelocating parent,
  4 21 if the court finds that, in regard to the level of care
  4 22 provided by each parent, the care provided by the
  4 23 nonrelocating parent is equal to the level of care provided by
  4 24 the relocating parent.  If the court does modify the order and
  4 25 awards joint legal custody and physical care to the
  4 26 nonrelocating parent, the court is also to modify the custody
  4 27 order to preserve, as nearly as possible, the existing
  4 28 relationship between the minor child and the relocating
  4 29 parent.  Additionally, if the order is modified, the order may
  4 30 include a provision for extended visitation during summer
  4 31 vacations and school breaks and scheduled telephone contact
  4 32 between the relocating parent and the minor child.  The
  4 33 modification may also include a provision assigning the
  4 34 responsibility for transportation of the minor child for
  4 35 visitation purposes to either or both parents.
  5  1    Current law is retained regarding modification of the order
  5  2 in a manner that retains the award of custody with the
  5  3 relocating parent and the provisions relating to preserving
  5  4 the existing relationship with the nonrelocating parent,
  5  5 extended vacations and school breaks, telephone contact, and
  5  6 provision for transportation of the minor child for visitation
  5  7 purposes to either or both parents.
  5  8    The bill amends the provision relating to posting of a cash
  5  9 bond based on past interference by the relocating parent to
  5 10 apply to both parents.
  5 11    The bill provides that one basis for a finding of contempt
  5 12 under the dissolution of marriage and domestic relations Code
  5 13 chapter is that a person willfully disobeyed an order or
  5 14 decree by unilaterally deciding to deny visitation, as
  5 15 prescribed by the order or decree, in response to a
  5 16 non=life=threatening emergency.  The punishment for contempt
  5 17 is commitment to the county jail for a period not to exceed 30
  5 18 days for each offense, or an alternative penalty specified in
  5 19 the section.
  5 20    The bill also directs that, unless the court finds that it
  5 21 is not in the best interest of the child, any custody order or
  5 22 decree in which the parents are awarded joint legal custody
  5 23 shall provide that each parent shall offer the other parent
  5 24 the opportunity for additional time with the child before
  5 25 making other arrangements for temporary care of the child if,
  5 26 during the time a parent is otherwise responsible for
  5 27 providing physical care of the child, the parent is unable to
  5 28 provide such physical care for a period of time exceeding
  5 29 eight consecutive hours.
  5 30 LSB 1673YH 83
  5 31 pf/nh/8