House File 455 - Introduced HOUSE FILE BY KAUFMANN, ABDUL=SAMAD, SCHUELLER, and SANDS Passed House, Date Passed Senate, Date Vote: Ayes Nays Vote: Ayes Nays Approved A BILL FOR 1 An Act relating to child custody and visitation. 2 BE IT ENACTED BY THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY OF THE STATE OF IOWA: 3 TLSB 1673YH 83 4 pf/nh/8 PAG LIN 1 1 Section 1. NEW SECTION. 256.47 EXTRACURRICULAR 1 2 ACTIVITIES == CUSTODIAL INTERFERENCE. 1 3 A school=related extracurricular activity shall not be 1 4 required for a student if it interferes with the custody 1 5 arrangement of a student when the extracurricular activity is 1 6 scheduled outside of regular school hours. If a scheduled 1 7 school=related extracurricular activity interferes with a 1 8 noncustodial parent's custody arrangement, the parent shall 1 9 notify an appropriate school official and the student shall be 1 10 excused without penalty from attending the specific activity. 1 11 This section does not apply to special events such as 1 12 performances, games, and competitions. For the purposes of 1 13 this section, "school=related extracurricular activity" means 1 14 an activity that takes place outside of regular school hours 1 15 whether or not it is related to the student's academic 1 16 curriculum. The state board shall adopt rules relating to the 1 17 implementation of this section. 1 18 Sec. 2. Section 598.21D, Code 2009, is amended to read as 1 19 follows: 1 20 598.21D RELOCATION OF PARENT AS GROUNDS TO MODIFY ORDER OF 1 21 CHILD CUSTODY == LEVEL OF CARE CONSIDERATION IN MODIFYING. 1 22 1. If a parent awarded joint legal custody and physical 1 23 care or sole legal custody is relocating the residence of the 1 24 minor child to a location which is one hundred fifty miles or 1 25 more from the residence of the minor child at the time that 1 26 custody was awarded, the court may consider the relocation a 1 27 substantial change in circumstances. 1 28 2. If the court determines that the relocation is a 1 29 substantial change in circumstances, in determining the best 1 30 interest of the child, the court may modify an existing order 1 31 that awarded joint legal custody and physical care to the 1 32 relocating parent and instead award joint legal custody and 1 33 physical care to the nonrelocating parent, if the court finds 1 34 that, in regard to the level of care provided by each parent, 1 35 the care provided by the nonrelocating parent is equal to the 2 1 level of care provided by the relocating parent. If the court 2 2 modifies the order and awards joint legal custody and physical 2 3 care to the nonrelocating parent, the court shall modify the 2 4 custody order to, at a minimum, preserve, as nearly as 2 5 possible, the existing relationship between the minor child 2 6 and the relocating parent. If modified, the order may include 2 7 a provision for extended visitation during summer vacations 2 8 and school breaks and scheduled telephone contact between the 2 9 relocating parent and the minor child. The modification may 2 10 include a provision assigning the responsibility for 2 11 transportation of the minor child for visitation purposes to 2 12 either or both parents. 2 13 3. If the court determines that the relocation is a 2 14 substantial change in circumstances, and the court modifies 2 15 the custody order retaining the provisions of the order 2 16 awarding joint legal custody and physical care or sole legal 2 17 custody to the relocating parent, the court shall modify the 2 18 custody order to, at a minimum, preserve, as nearly as 2 19 possible, the existing relationship between the minor child 2 20 and the nonrelocating parent. If modified, the order may 2 21 include a provision for extended visitation during summer 2 22 vacations and school breaks and scheduled telephone contact 2 23 between the nonrelocating parent and the minor child. The 2 24 modification may include a provision assigning the 2 25 responsibility for transportation of the minor child for 2 26 visitation purposes to either or both parents. 2 27 4. If the court makes a finding of past interference by 2 28thea parentawarded joint legal custody and physical care or 2 29 sole legal custodywith the minor child's access to the other 2 30 parent, the court may order the posting of a cash bond to 2 31 assure future compliance with the visitation provisions of the 2 32 decree. The supreme court shall prescribe guidelines for the 2 33 forfeiting of the bond and restoration of the bond following 2 34 forfeiting of the bond. 2 35 Sec. 3. Section 598.23, subsection 1, Code 2009, is 3 1 amended to read as follows: 3 2 1. If a person against whom a temporary order or final 3 3 decree has been entered willfully disobeys the order or 3 4 decree, the person may be cited and punished by the court for 3 5 contempt and be committed to the county jail for a period of 3 6 time not to exceed thirty days for each offense. The court 3 7 may find that a person willfully disobeyed the order or decree 3 8 and hold the person in contempt if the person is found to have 3 9 unilaterally decided to deny visitation, as prescribed by the 3 10 order or decree, in response to a non=life=threatening 3 11 emergency. 3 12 Sec. 4. Section 598.41, Code 2009, is amended by adding 3 13 the following new subsection: 3 14 NEW SUBSECTION. 7A. Unless the court finds that such a 3 15 provision is not in the best interest of the child, in any 3 16 custody order or decree in which the parents are awarded joint 3 17 legal custody, the order or decree shall provide that each 3 18 parent shall offer the other parent the opportunity for 3 19 additional time with the child before making other 3 20 arrangements for temporary care of the child if, during the 3 21 time a parent is otherwise responsible for providing physical 3 22 care of the child, the parent is unable to provide such 3 23 physical care for a period of time exceeding eight consecutive 3 24 hours. 3 25 EXPLANATION 3 26 This bill includes provisions relating to custody and 3 27 visitation of a child. 3 28 The bill allows students to be excused from school-related 3 29 extracurricular activities if the activity interferes with 3 30 scheduled visitation with a noncustodial parent. The bill 3 31 requires that when a parent informs a school official of a 3 32 conflict between an extracurricular activity scheduled outside 3 33 regular school hours and the student's custody arrangement 3 34 with a noncustodial parent, the student will be excused from 3 35 the activity without penalty. The bill provides exceptions 4 1 for special events such as performances, games, and 4 2 competitions. The bill covers all school=related 4 3 extracurricular activities, whether or not the activities are 4 4 related to the student's academic curriculum. The bill 4 5 requires the state board of education to adopt rules that will 4 6 enforce the bill. 4 7 The bill amends provisions relating to relocation of a 4 8 parent as grounds for modification of a child custody order. 4 9 Current law provides that if a parent who has been awarded 4 10 joint legal custody and physical care or sole legal custody is 4 11 relocating the residence of the minor child to a location 4 12 which is 150 miles or more from the residence of the minor 4 13 child at the time that custody was awarded, the court may 4 14 consider the relocation a substantial change in circumstances. 4 15 The bill provides that if the court determines that the 4 16 relocation is a substantial change in circumstances, in 4 17 determining the best interest of the child, the court may 4 18 modify the existing order that awarded joint legal custody and 4 19 physical care to the relocating parent and instead award joint 4 20 legal custody and physical care to the nonrelocating parent, 4 21 if the court finds that, in regard to the level of care 4 22 provided by each parent, the care provided by the 4 23 nonrelocating parent is equal to the level of care provided by 4 24 the relocating parent. If the court does modify the order and 4 25 awards joint legal custody and physical care to the 4 26 nonrelocating parent, the court is also to modify the custody 4 27 order to preserve, as nearly as possible, the existing 4 28 relationship between the minor child and the relocating 4 29 parent. Additionally, if the order is modified, the order may 4 30 include a provision for extended visitation during summer 4 31 vacations and school breaks and scheduled telephone contact 4 32 between the relocating parent and the minor child. The 4 33 modification may also include a provision assigning the 4 34 responsibility for transportation of the minor child for 4 35 visitation purposes to either or both parents. 5 1 Current law is retained regarding modification of the order 5 2 in a manner that retains the award of custody with the 5 3 relocating parent and the provisions relating to preserving 5 4 the existing relationship with the nonrelocating parent, 5 5 extended vacations and school breaks, telephone contact, and 5 6 provision for transportation of the minor child for visitation 5 7 purposes to either or both parents. 5 8 The bill amends the provision relating to posting of a cash 5 9 bond based on past interference by the relocating parent to 5 10 apply to both parents. 5 11 The bill provides that one basis for a finding of contempt 5 12 under the dissolution of marriage and domestic relations Code 5 13 chapter is that a person willfully disobeyed an order or 5 14 decree by unilaterally deciding to deny visitation, as 5 15 prescribed by the order or decree, in response to a 5 16 non=life=threatening emergency. The punishment for contempt 5 17 is commitment to the county jail for a period not to exceed 30 5 18 days for each offense, or an alternative penalty specified in 5 19 the section. 5 20 The bill also directs that, unless the court finds that it 5 21 is not in the best interest of the child, any custody order or 5 22 decree in which the parents are awarded joint legal custody 5 23 shall provide that each parent shall offer the other parent 5 24 the opportunity for additional time with the child before 5 25 making other arrangements for temporary care of the child if, 5 26 during the time a parent is otherwise responsible for 5 27 providing physical care of the child, the parent is unable to 5 28 provide such physical care for a period of time exceeding 5 29 eight consecutive hours. 5 30 LSB 1673YH 83 5 31 pf/nh/8